THE DEEP STATE AND SHADOW GOVERNMENT, part 5 - CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

CONTINUED FROM 1-

For Weber, this means--
--A rigid division of labor is established that clearly identifies regular tasks and duties of the particular bureaucratic system.
--Regulations describe firmly established chains of command and the duties and capacity to coerce others to comply.
--Hiring people with particular, certified qualifications supports regular and continuous execution of the assigned duties.

Weber notes that these three aspects "...constitute the essence of bureaucratic administration...in the public sector. In the private sector, these three aspects constitute the essence of a bureaucratic management of a private company."

Main principles (characteristics):
##### UNWRITTEN RULE- LOYALTY TO JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO WILL REMAIN IN THE SHADOWS #########
--Specialized roles
--Recruitment based on merit (e.g., tested through open competition)
--Uniform principles of placement, promotion, and transfer in an administrative system
--Careerism with systematic salary structure
--Hierarchy, responsibility and accountability
--Subjection of official conduct to strict rules of discipline and control
--Supremacy of abstract rules
--Impersonal authority (e.g., office bearer does not bring the office with him)
--Political neutrality

In his 1922 essay Bureaucracy,published in his magnum opus Economy and Society, Weber described many ideal-typical forms of public administration, government, and business. His ideal-typical bureaucracy, whether public or private, is characterized by:--

--hierarchical organization
--formal lines of authority (chain of command)
--a fixed area of activity
--rigid division of labor
--regular and continuous execution of assigned tasks
--all decisions and powers specified and restricted by regulations
--officials with expert training in their fields
--career advancement dependent on technical qualifications
--qualifications evaluated by organizational rules, not individuals

As democracies become more complex, they inevitably become bureaucratic.

There are good reasons for this. Bureaucracies are often the most efficient way of accomplishing complex tasks. They develop rules and procedures to handle the kinds of cases arising repeatedly, eliminating the need to think through the same problems again and again. People within bureacracies become experts.

AND OF COURSE PRE-CONCIEVED NOTIONS ENGAVED IN STONE.. THIS IS THE PAST PRACTICE—THIS IS THE WAY IT MUST BE DONE ( THE WAY JEW ROTHSCHILD WANTS IT )

The procedures and rules they devise render outcomes calculable — and thus predictable. This makes society as a whole more rational, letting people form reasonable expectations about the effects of their actions.

Democracy promotes bureaucracy for moral reasons too. Citizens of a democracy demand equal treatment before the law, which requires that the same rules are applied to all.

Bureaucrats claim authority over areas of culture — e.g., education and the arts — over which they have no expertise, and over which, perhaps, no one can have expertise. Their decisions increasingly serve their own interests ( READ AS ROTHSCHILDs INTERESTS ) rather than the interests of their society.

Democracy and the bureaucracy it spawns thus come into conflict with one another. Weber wrote, "Democracy as such is opposed to the 'rule' of bureaucracy."

The administrators become a rule-giving class promoting its own power. They keep their procedures secret, keeping to themselves the knowledge that grants them a superior social position. The people find themselves increasingly powerless. They find themselves at the mercy of those they did not elect and cannot influence.

Bureaucrats become autocrats. The people become their subjects.

ELECTED LEADERS MAY COME AND GO..

Bureaucracy, Weber concludes, is among the hardest of social structures to destroy. It becomes a powerful weapon in the hands of those who control it.

ROTHSCHILD RULED !


CONTINUED TO 3--

CONTINUED FROM 2-

Those really in control, moreover, are not necessarily those nominally in control. Heads of state and other elected officials may come and go. The bureaucracy chugs on, impervious to their policies and goals.

Meanwhile, the moral principle that cases should be judged with equal justice for all falls by the wayside. The bureaucracy favors itself and its political allies, who vote in favor of larger budgets and greater spheres of authority.

This is the paradox of progressivism. In the name of democracy, it creates a bureaucracy threatening democracy.

The Progressive paradox is ‘the curse of bigness,’ . It is the deleterious effects of the expansion and centralization of business and government. As organizations grow, they become increasingly inaccessible and procedurally rational. Their capacity to remain accountable to their constituents is inversely proportionate to their efficiency.

Expert bureaucrats rely on complicated schemes like insurance or subtle changes in promulgated regulations, which make it difficult for non-experts to engage as equals in ascertaining the relationship and judging their efficacy between policy measures and policy goals.

BULLSHIT MODERN ECONOMICS IS ROTHSCHILDs ECONOMICS

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/06/gpi-dog-shall-wag-gdp-tail-not-vice.html

Weber’s analysis is a portrayal of the DEEP STATE .

America finds itself struggling against a bureaucracy displaying all the negative features he warned about. The deep state demands a greater share of the economy. It extends its reach beyond even education and the arts — to bedrooms and bathrooms. It insists on credentials which seem to reflect no real expertise but exclude people of the "wrong" social background.

The moral case for bureaucracy — that cases be decided with equal justice for all — falls away as well. The bureaucrats form an alliance with political parties ( Lutyens deep state is packed with JNU comnies with NO love for the watan ) which increasingly defines itself as the party of the deep state and strives to increase its authority over us.

When the people finally get fed up and elect someone who understands the problem and promises to fight for them, the deep state does everything it can to ignore, undermine, and, if possible, destroy them.

We may not yet be experiencing "a polar night of icy darkness," trapped in an "iron cage," as Weber feared, but we are surely ensnared in an overlapping series of "Weberian webs."

We seem unable to escape. What can we do?

Weber’s writings offer little hope. But there are hints at strategies for breaking out of the web. We need to make officials accountable to the people. For this there must be LIGHT ..

CENTRAL LUTYENS MINISTRIES HAVE BEEN BOMBARDED WITH COMMENTS FROM THIS WEBSITE.. THEY IGNORED IT AT THEIR PERIL. NOW THEY ARE RUNNING SCARED.

The bureaucrats will do their best to keep that from happening. Under the Obama administration we saw serious misbehavior go unpunished again and again. It was meant to be that way with SES created as a Hegelian Dialectic after WATERGATE.

Pursued ad hoc, the strategy is hopeless.

Reform needs to be structural to have a chance.

What can we do?

The civil service should not be independent. Its objectivity is already a sham; one party has captured it. The voters need to be able to make their voices heard. Trump should be able to drain the swamp.

WE ASK MODI TO PROFILE EACH AND EVERY LUTYENS BABU WHO HAS A NICE BUNGLOW FOR HIMSLEF, NICE SALARY, NICE BRIBES , BEDDED DOWN FR COSY RETIREMENT..

SORRY –FROM NOW ON, YOU BASTARDS WILL HAVE EXPIRY DATES TATTOED ON YOUR FOREHEADS

Bureaucrats should have term limits. All but a few essential agencies should too. A permanent bureaucracy threatens democracy. Reforms have no chance unless they challenge its permanence.

CONTINUED TO 4--

CONTINUED FROM 3--

We need educational reform. Bureaucracy promotes specialization. It generates educational institutions — serving it and expressing its interests. We need to restore a broad education, one which cultivates as well as trains; expressing and instilling our civilization’s values and DHARMA.

We don’t need commie theory to be taught in JNU .

It is better to shut down these strains like COMMIE SOCIAL SCIENCES which breeds CUNTS like BHINDOW SEAT and PROMOSSANN seeking Kanhaiya Kumar.

Read all 11 parts of the post below--
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/02/jnu-den-of-anti-nationals-and-communist.html

That means taking control of education away from the bureaucracy ( and their mentors like DEEP STATE COMMIE Romila Thapar )and returning it to the people.

Max Weber was the first to endorse bureaucracy as a necessary feature of modernity, and by the late 19th century bureaucratic forms had begun their spread from government to other large-scale institutions.

BALLS TO MAX WEBER.

BALLS TO HIS BOSS JEW ROTHSCHILD

BALLS TO ROMILA THAPAR — SHE DOES NOT HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO UNDERSTAND GERMAN EJWS MARX AND WEBER ..MAHAMRUS OF SOCIOLOGY ..

TRUE JOKE: SOMEONE ASKED ROMILA BABY—WHY ARE YOU NOT MARRIED. WHYA RE YOU BARREN ?

SHE SPAKE -- MY FATHER OFFERED ME DEGREE OR DOWRY. I CHOSE DEGREE !

IS THIS WOMAN FROM THE FALL THAPAR FAMILY CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING THE INDIAN PSYCHE ?

Capt ajit vadakayil
..