THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 4, BELOW--
Once I was in London for a month.
I visited the Marx Memorial Library in London holds more than 43,000 books, pamphlets and newspapers on Marxism.
The Library opened in 1933 and was a crowded house.. teeming with Commie. After all this planet’s greatest thinker ( sic ) Marx stayed in London for the 34 years of his life .
I noticed that the library has nobody inside except the librarian at noon time on a Saturday
I asked the librarian for the register , and found people do not come there anymore..
Now the commies has resorted to begging to keep the library afloat..
Engels used to meet Marx regularly in Chetham's Library , Manchester England ( to give him money and orders from Rothschild ) and the alcove where they met remains identical to this day.
Engels refused to meet Marx in his filthy pig sty home..
Engels refused to meet Marx in his filthy pig sty home..
Below: Nobody visits this commie atheist shrine where the Communist manifesto was born, today . I felt negative vibes and ran from here
This planet has rejected DRIPPING' CUNT Marx and his stupid book Das Kapital . Communism of Marx is dead...
READ QUESTIONS TO QUORA 686 TO 820 IN THE POST BELOW --
THERE ARE CUNTS IN INDIA WHO INSTEAD OF SAYING “TRAIN” -- WILL INSTEAD SAY “LOHPAT GAAMINI AAWAT JAAWAT YANTRA”
SAME WAY CUNT KARL MARX WILL SAY “ SURPLUS VALUE THEORY ” -- INSTEAD OF “ PROFIT ”
RECAPITULATION:
The labor theory of value (LTV) is a heterodox theory of value that argues that the economic value of a good or service is determined by the total amount of "socially necessary labor" required to produce it.
There are three main points wrong with the Labor Theory of Value and how it fits into Marxian economics.
First, the idea that labor is the only source of value is bullshit. Marx had a very specific definition of labor, which stated that labor was the physical act of working, typically menial work that involves the production of a certain product or commodity. This is not the only source of value, because services exist in which the worker is not alienated from their commodity. Marxism overall is a very narrow “blinker on” ideology that does not fit into the context of the real world. PRICELESS ON PAPER SHIT ON TERRAIN..
The second issue with the Labor Theory of Value interpreted by Marx is that it doesn’t take into account the skill or efficiency of the worker. I valued effective workers at sea.. Being effective is about doing the right things. There are busy dimwits who achieve fuck all. Effectiveness describes getting to an outcome – even if it takes longer. Anyone with common sense can understand that different people have different capabilities when it comes to physical labor, but this theory does not take skill or strength into account, the only measurement of the value of one’s work according to Marxian economics is the amount of time spent laboring.
Third, Marx separates price from value, which begs the question, who determines the proportional relationship between the hours one works and the value of said labor? It’ll be determined by one or a few people in particular, however in capitalism the value is determined by supply and demand, so by the average consumer as well as the people adjusting their production of a certain commodity.
In short, the Labor Theory of Value, which Marxism relies upon to be a valid philosophy, is extremely flawed and is easily disproved, therefore the idea of “capitalists” making a profit that they have not earned is a falsehood, because management and organization of firms is also a source of value.
The LTV is central to Marxist theory, which holds that the working class is exploited under capitalism, and dissociates price and value. Price is determined by supply and demand.
Since labor power is not produced by rational cost calculations, labor power value will not necessarily be "proportional to the man hours" involved in its "production." Even a 15 year old school child can figure this out..
Marx baby’s labor theory of BHALOO nay --value is without practical importance and is dead and buried.
In Das Kapital (1867), Karl Marx says that the motivating force of capitalism is in the exploitation of labor, whose unpaid work is the ultimate source of “surplus value”.
Marx’s justification of his theory of surplus value in the face of unequal compositions of capital, by interpreting total profits as a redistribution of surplus value, is bullshit
Although value has a quantitative aspect this cannot be measured in practice. There is no way we can measure the value of a pencil, or a car, or any commodity directly. Nor can value be measured indirectly through relative prices.
Marx took a higher rate of exploitation in the developed countries for granted.
According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold
Marxism, views the root of the economic disparities within the structure of capitalism itself. Surplus value is the key to understanding why society is divided into a handful of super-rich ( bourgeois ) and millions of poor and working people ( proletariat )
Jew Karl Marx used Jew David Ricardo as the starting point of his own economic theory of capitalism.
Marx baby spAke that workers do not sell their labor, but rather their labor power— their ability to work.
For part of the day, the workers produce the value that covers the cost of their own existence. In essence, what the workers produce the rest of the day is unpaid labor.
KHOON PASEENA LETHA HAI, PAISA DENA ROTHA HAI.
Marxists call this extra value that the worker produces during the course of a day’s work “surplus value.” Under capitalism, the owners of capital—the ones who buy the workers’ labor power—own the fruits of that labor. This is how the capitalists make profits—when the commodity produced by the workers is sold in the marketplace, its price is far above the amount the capitalist had to spend in wages to produce it. The capitalist takes the difference. The capitalist owns the surplus value.
KHOON PASEENA LETHA HAI, PAISA DENA ROTHA HAI.
To the employer, labor power has a very clear use value: it earns the capitalist a profit. This is the basic inequality built into the capitalist system. As long as one small class of owners controls the surplus BHALOOO - nay value created by the working class, there will always be rich and poor, wealth and poverty.
KHOON PASEENA LETHA HAI, PAISA DENA ROTHA HAI.
Marx baby contentedendeneded that surplus value was the basis of capitalist profit. . In the drive for increasing profits, wages are held as low as possible.
Marxists aim to abolish the right of the tiny capitalist class to own in private the surplus value that is created by the millions of workers in society. Instead of serving private gain, the productivity of humanity and society’s surplus would benefit the vast majority of society—those who produce it.
Check out the bullshit— whom is he trying to impress by integrating math into his mindless nay chootiya theories ? Indians are not dumbos when it comes to Math, unlike the white man.. we invented Math
For Karl Marx, surplus value is critical to the expansion of capital. In the money circuit M – C – M ’, capitalists purchase commodities (C ) with money (M ) in order to sell these commodities for more than their initial outlay (M ’).
Surplus value is the difference M ’ – M, the profit that the capitalist makes at the end of the money circuit. Instead of hoarding this profit, as would a miser, the capitalist reinvests it in a new, enhanced circuit of money. The conclusion of each circuit, with more value produced, provides the starting point for the expansion of capital in each subsequent circuit.
The problem that Marx (1867) sets himself in Capital, volume 1, is how capitalists can sell for more than they buy. Are some commodities sold for more than they cost? The answer is yes and no.
Marx assumes that capitalists pay for the full cost of inputs such as raw materials, which are used in the production process. The yarn that is used by the weaver is paid for at full cost. However, there is one commodity that does beget more value than its cost: labor power.
AND MARX BABY CANNOT SEE BEYONG THE RICH MILL OWNER AND THE POOR MILL WORKER.. HE IS THE QUINTESSENTIAL FROG IN THE KOSHER WELL
Digression: In Calicut , near the football stadium ground, there was a colony of Tamil scavengers.. My friend took me to watch their Ramayana drama. We both were nine years old.
So we have black faced Sita, a Tamilian dalit man in a saree, with lot of talcum powder on her face and two coconuts as tits .
She is sulking like mad—as her husband is going to the forest on exile without taking her.
Ram tells Sita. Please, kindly don’t come with me to the forest.
Ram sings to deter wife Sita “ KALLUNDU KAATIL , MULLUNDU KAATIL, KAATU PANNIKKAL UNDU” ( there are sharp stones , thorns and wild pigs in the forest )
Of course , Ram being a scavenger ( dealing with human shit daily ) cannot think of tigers , deep rivers or such majestic things..
Sita in a deep sulk says in a gruff voice “ NAAAA VARRUMM “ ( I will come, in Tamil )
I had such a terrific belly laugh that all THOTTIS ( govt paid scavengers ) looked at me angrily ..
I and my friend ran from there ..
Even today if I want to have a good laugh, I think about it..
On the one hand labor power, which is sold by workers to capitalists, has a capacity to produce output. The capitalist makes use of a worker’s labor power, say for eight hours per day, adding eight hours of value to the commodity produced. On the other hand it has a cost, which for the capitalist is the outlay of wages that enable workers, and their families, to subsist.
Crucially, the value of this labor power is less than the value of the worker’s output. The worker may have to work only four hours per day to produce value that is equivalent to the goods required for subsistence. But, exercising control over the labor process, the capitalist requires an eight-hour day: the worker is robbed of four hours of labor power that is extracted by the capitalist as surplus value.
For Marx, surplus value entails the exploitation of workers by the capitalist class.
From a political point of view, the theory of surplus value has been an ideological weapon for exposing the injustice of the capitalist production process. The capitalist seeks to extend the working day to extract what Marx refers to as absolute surplus value (a reduction in the value of labor power would increase relative surplus value).
Marx’s theory of surplus value provides the basis for arguing for a reduction in working hours. Or KHALAASS KHALAASS— finish your work faast in two hours and go home , get under the blanket , hold your proletariat balls and go to sleep.
In making the argument that workers are exploited, the problem is that on the surface, workers seem to be paid a wage for the full working day.
Key to the analytical power of surplus value is Marx’s assumption, maintained in the first two volumes of Capital, that commodities are sold at their values. The money value of consumption goods purchased by workers, using money wages, is the same as the labor embodied in those commodities; the money value of the output produced by workers is the same as the labor embodied in that output. Hence there is an assumed equivalence between surplus value, measured in units of labor time, and money profits, located in the circulation of money.
In Capital, volume 3, Marx allows prices to diverge from values, the equivalence between surplus value and profits is not successfully maintained. Marx develops a procedure for transforming values into prices that is incomplete. Whereas the outputs of each branch of production are transformed from values to prices, the transformation is not carried out for inputs.
When the values of inputs are transformed into prices the consequences are severe. Total money profits are different from total surplus value, there being no reason why the category of embodied labor value should be at all useful. Since capitalists only care about money profits, why should Marxists use the irrelevant category of surplus value? Marx was not so bright, he could not comprehend this..
Embodied labor time -- my ass.
Goods can only have value if they are sold in the marketplace, so what matters is the form that value takes in exchange—the value-form of commodities.
Proponents of the value-form approach argue that in Capital, volume 1, Marx uses both labor embodied and value-form definitions of the value of labor power. In the “new solution” to the transformation problem, the value-form definition is preferred, with the share of wages in money income interpreted to be the value of labor power.
In this approach, the equivalence between money profits and surplus value is established, even when both inputs and outputs are transformed from value to prices.
Hey, but with this value-form approach is that by abandoning labor-embodied values, Marx’s approach is drained of all content.
Surplus value" is a translation of the German word "Mehrwert", which simply means value added (sales revenue less the cost of materials used up), and is cognate to English "more worth". Surplus-value is the difference between the amount raised through a sale of a product and the amount it cost to the owner of that product to manufacture it: i.e. the amount raised through sale of the product minus the cost of the materials, plant and labour power. It is a central concept in Karl Marx's critique of political economy.
Conventionally, value-added is equal to the sum of gross wage income and gross profit income. However, Marx uses the term Mehrwert to describe the yield, profit or return on production capital invested, i.e. the amount of the increase in the value of capital. Hence, Marx's use of Mehrwert has always been translated as "surplus value", distinguishing it from "value-added".
According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold.
Total surplus-value in an economy (Marx refers to the mass or volume of surplus-value) is basically equal to the sum of net distributed and undistributed profit, net interest, net rents, net tax on production and various net receipts associated with royalties, licensing, leasing, certain honorariums etc. .
Surplus-value may be viewed in several ways :
As a component of the new value product, which Marx himself defines as equal to the sum of labor costs in respect of capitalistically productive labor (variable capital) and surplus-value. In production, he argues, the workers produce a value equal to their wages plus an additional value, the surplus-value.
They also transfer part of the value of fixed assets and materials to the new product, equal to economic depreciation (consumption of fixed capital) and intermediate goods used up (constant capital inputs). Labor costs and surplus-value are the monetary valuations of what Marx calls the necessary product and the surplus product, or paid labour and unpaid labour.
Surplus-value can also be viewed as a flow of net income appropriated by the owners of capital in virtue of asset ownership, comprising both distributed personal income and undistributed business income. In the whole economy, this will include both income directly from production and property income.
Surplus-value can be viewed as the source of society's accumulation fund or investment fund; part of it is re-invested, but part is appropriated as personal income, and used for consumptive purposes by the owners of capital assets (see capital accumulation); in exceptional circumstances, part of it may also be hoarded in some way. In this context, surplus value can also be measured as the increase in the value of the stock of capital assets through an accounting period, prior to distribution.
Surplus-value can be viewed as a social relation of production, or as the monetary valuation of surplus-labour – a sort of "index" of the balance of power between social classes or nations in the process of the division of the social product.
Surplus-value can, in a developed capitalist economy, be viewed also as an indicator of the level of social productivity that has been reached by the working population, i.e. the net amount of value it can produce with its labour in excess of its own consumption requirements.
Marx thought that capitalists exploited surplus value from workers and that to end such exploitation, workers had to resort to violent class struggle.
If Mad Marx was in front of me I would have kicked his commie ass, and kicked it good.
THE THEORY OF "SURPLUS VALUE" IS THE BACKBONE OF VOL. 1 OF DAS KAPITAL. HOWEVER, ANYONE WHO HAS STUDIED ECONOMICS KNOWS THAT MARX'S THEORY IS TOTALLY ILLOGICAL.
In the making of a product, the labor of the worker constitutes an important but not a unique contribution. The process and factors of production are very complicated; labor is merely one important factor. People who work in big industries today know this.
For lack of objective logical support, the theory and dogma of Das Kapital can no longer gain a footing in today's society. This book is long dead..it can never be resurrected.
DAS KAPITAL IS DEAD
LONG LIVE DAS KAPITAL
So so so
According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold.
Marx himself considered his theory of surplus-value his most important contribution to the progress of economic analysis (Marx, letter to Engels of 24 August 1867). ... Surplus-value is essentially just that: the money form of the social surplus product or, what amounts to the same, the money product of surplus labour
A surplus is used to describe many excess assets including income, profits, capital, and goods. ... Economic surplus is related to supply and demand. Net profit is the gross profit (revenue minus cost of goods) minus operating expenses and all other expenses, such as taxes and interest paid on debt.
Because Marx's stupid followers have adhered too closely to the theory of surplus value and concentrated their efforts on labor problems, they have neglected other factors of industrial production and development.
"PROFIT" IN MARXIST TERMINOLOGY DENOTES "SURPLUS VALUE". THAT EVEN THE COMMUNISTS WANT TO EXPLOIT THE WORKERS'"SURPLUS VALUE". ONLY AN INTELLIGENT MAN CAN READ THIS BETWEEN THE LINES.
Theories of Surplus Value forms the longest (about 110 printed sheets) and most fully elaborated part of this huge manuscript, and it is the first and only draft of the fourth, concluding volume of Das Kapital. As distinguished from the three theoretical volumes of Das Kapital, Marx called this volume the historical, historico-critical, or historico-literary part of his work.
Marx’s theory of classes is based on the recognition that in each class society, part of society (the ruling class) appropriates the social surplus product. But that surplus product can take three essentially different forms (or a combination of them).
It can take the form of straightforward unpaid surplus labour, as in the slave mode of production, early feudalism or some sectors of the Asiatic mode of production (unpaid corvée labour for the Empire).
It can take the form of goods appropriated by the ruling class in the form of use-values pure and simple (the products of surplus labour), as under feudalism when feudal rent is paid in a certain amount of produce (produce rent) or in its more modern remnants, such as sharecropping.
And it can take a money form, like money-rent in the final phases of feudalism, and capitalist profits. Surplus-value is essentially just that: the money form of the social surplus product or, what amounts to the same, the money product of surplus labour.
It has therefore a common root with all other forms of surplus product: unpaid labour.
KHOON PASEENA LETHA HAI, PAISA DENA ROTHA HAI
The income of the ruling classes can always be reduced in the final analysis to the product of unpaid labour: that is the heart of Marx’s theory of exploitation.
That is also the reason why Marx attached so much importance to treating surplus-value as a general category, over and above profits (themselves subdivided into industrial profits, bank profits, commercial profits etc.), interest and rent, which are all part of the total surplus product produced by wage labour.
It is this general category which explains both the existence (the common interest) of the ruling class (all those who live off surplus value), and the origins of the class struggle under capitalism.
The whole Marxian theory of surplus-value is therefore based upon that subtle distinction between ‘labour power’ and ‘labour’ (or value). But there is nothing ‘metaphysical’ about this distinction.
The worker is victim not of vulgar theft but of a social set-up which condemns him first to transform his productive capacity into a commodity, then to sell that labour power on a specific market (the labour market) characterised by institutional inequality, and finally to content himself with the market price he can get for that commodity, irrespective of whether the new value he creates during the process of production exceeds that market price (his wage) by a small amount, a large amount, or an enormous amount.
The labour power the capitalist has bought ‘adds value’ to that of the used-up raw materials and tools (machinery, buildings etc.). If, and until that point of time, this added value is inferior or equal to the workers’ wages, surplus-value cannot originate.
But in that case, the capitalist has obviously no interest in hiring wage labour. He only hires it because that wage labour has the quality (the use value) to add to the raw materials’ value more than its own value (i.e. its own wages).
This ‘additional added value’ (the difference between total ‘value added’ and wages) is precisely surplus-value. Its emergence from the process of production is the precondition for the capitalists’ hiring workers, for the existence of the capitalist mode of production.
Marx has fallen PHUTT on his face with his bullshit book Das Kapital – it has has completely lost its power to instigate and move the people of the world.
Marx's Theories of Surplus Value was edited by Jew Karl Kautsky, a Marxist theoretician. Kautsky was recognized as among the most authoritative promulgators of Orthodox Marxism after the death of Friedrich Engels in 1895
At the time of his death (1883), Marx had prepared the manuscript for Das Kapital, Volume IV, a critical history of theories of surplus value of his time, the 19th century. Jew Karl Kautsky published a partial edition of Marx's surplus-value critique and later published a full, three-volume edition as Theorien über den Mehrwert (Theories of Surplus Value, 1905–1910).
Whether the rate of profit in capitalism has, as Marx predicted, tended to fall is a subject of debate. N. Okishio, in 1961, devised a theorem (Okishio's theorem) showing that if capitalists pursue cost-cutting techniques and if the real wage does not rise, the rate of profit must rise
Okishio's theorem-- if one capitalist raises his profits by introducing a new technique that cuts his costs, the collective or general rate of profit in society – for all capitalists – goes up. According to Okishio, it contradicts Marx's law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall .
Marx had claimed that the new general rate of profit, after a new technique has spread throughout the branch where it has been introduced, would be lower than before
In Volume One of "Das Kapital," Marx said that capitalists made "profits" unfairly, by seizing the "surplus value of labor," which he defined as the difference between the factory owner's costs and the money he was able to obtain by selling goods produced in the factory.
Since the workers produced the goods, Marx argued, it was they, not the capitalist, who had a moral claim on earning all the sales revenues. The capitalist was, in this view, essentially a parasite. This led directly to Marx's fundamental political-economic prescription: The "proletariat" should seize the means of production.
Marx thought this would inevitably occur, in part because the proletariat was much more numerous than the capitalist class, and so would eventually win the "class struggle"— all it needed was sufficient "class consciousness" to recognize the nature of its predicament.
He also argued that in any given domain of industry, competition between capitalists would lead to overproduction, intense downward pressure on prices, and a consequent collapse in net profits.
This presumed tendency for the rate of profit to fall would inevitably lead to crises, because without profits, capitalists would be unable to continue financial accumulation. Capitalism, Marx and Engels thought, was systemically unstable. It would eventually collapse because of its "inherent contradictions," and give way to socialism, in which the means of production would be owned by the producers (the workers).
The end stage of socialism would, in Marx's model, be communism — a system in which private property disappeared altogether, and everything was owned in common. People would freely contribute according to their abilities, and take according to their needs. Marx never explored in detail how that was meant to work — and as it turns out, it didn't.
There are many inadequacies in Marx' analytical methodology, including "a long list of conclusions that do not follow or are downright wrong; mistakes which if corrected change essential inferences, sometimes into their opposites ( crossing the line of paradox)
The labor movement, , is not necessarily socialist and clearly benefits over time from capitalist economic development. Marx does not have the cerebral wherewithal to even understand the laws of paradox
Marx’ theory is mere "ideology," It is "unrealistic dreaming." while high on LSD
This extremist competitor of socialism, communism was just a movement of squabbling intellectuals trying to dazzle with brilliance ( to baffle with bullshit)
Marxism is in one sense a dogma laden "religion"– because messiah and this planet’s greatest thinker Marx said so !
Opponents who reject this revealed wisdom are "not merely in error but in sin" and are not to be tolerated.
Marxism provides "absolute standards" for understanding economic events and for guiding actions to achieve economic salvation from evil. It "promises paradise on this side of the grave."
In the United States during the Great Depression, Marx' theory most powerfully affirmed "the feelings of the unsuccessful many."
This was a deliberate Rothschild game. Rothschild plans centuries in advance to grab power and money.
Even today Hilly Billy Yanks are wondering why and how the Great American Depression took place..
TILL TODAY NOBODY ON THIS PLANET HAS FIGURED OUT WHY THE GREAT AMERICAN DEPRESSION TOOK PLACE..
ONLY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAS THE PERCEPTION TO TELL YOU THIS.
DURING AND AFTER THIS PERIOD, JEW ROTHSCHILD SUCCESSFULLY INJECTED COMMUNISM INTO CAPITALIST AMERICA..
COMMIE JEWS INFILTRATED TOOK OVER EVERY FACET OF AMERICAN SOCIETY..
.
![]()
Rothschild was so successful in his “ Commie indoctrinating” mission in five years flat Communism ( led by Jews ) was well entrenched in America .
Many working people on factories and farms—as well as professional people, journalists, teachers, writers, and artists—who had participated in these struggles were fooled into learning to respect Communists for both their words and their deeds, for their courage and commitment. Media and Hollywood controlled by Commie Jews worked overtime..
Communists and the CPUSA leadership took collective initiative to fight the Depression while the capitalist class was both panicking and calling upon government to do nothing and let the “free market” restore prosperity.
Capitalist predictions that the Depression would be over in weeks turned into months, and months into years. Rothschild allowed time for communism to spread..
In March 1930, Communists in the U.S. and around the world organized “International Unemployment Day” (on what was also both International Women’s Day and the 13th anniversary of the beginning of the Russian Revolution) to mobilize against the crisis. The demonstrations in the U.S. drew hundreds of tens of thousands, surprising even the Commie Jew organizers.
Unemployed Councils, USA, led by Commie Jew Herbert Benjamin, organized in cities across the country to block the evictions of tens of thousands of tenants who could not pay their rent, demanding work relief (public jobs for the unemployed) and home relief (aid for those who could not work, particularly women with dependent children and the disabled). In rural areas, Communists also joined with other groups in fighting against farm foreclosures.
Jew Benjamin, led massive national hunger marches on Washington in 1931 and 1932, the likes America never witness before
The Unemployed Councils came forward with a new idea—Unemployment Insurance, monopolized by Rothschild’s Jewish agents . The concept was so identified with the Communist Party that the then-conservative American Federation of Labor, in voting the proposal down in 1932, condemned it as a “Communistic program.”
In 1935, the New Deal government of Franklin Roosevelt, elected three years earlier at the height of the Depression, would enact unemployment insurance, along with the most comprehensive public works, labor, and social welfare legislation—including collective bargaining, old age pensions under Social Security, minimum wages, and the 40-hour week. Together, they represented the most important victories for workers in U.S. history. Every trade union was controlled and led by Jews.
Rothschild screwed Henry Ford for criticizing Jews..
Read both parts of the post below--
Rothschild’s stooge President Roosevelt would define these policies as an attempt to both reform, humanize, and save the capitalist system.. Commie W. E. B. Du Bois would say that they represented a surge in the direction of socialism.
While the benefits were less than the CPUSA and others advocated, both the leading role of the Communist Party in the Unemployed Councils as well as union and community organizing made policies that were considered impossible in 1929 realities less than a decade later.
Marxism seemed to explain persuasively the causes of capitalism’s collapse, while also providing a vision of an alternative social order. The book Das Kapital sold like hot cakes in America and All Rothschild Opium founded/ funded Ivy league colleges brainwashed students using Commie Jew professors
Freemason commie Jews would trigger the Spanish Civil war ( 1936 – 1939).
In Spain, the victory of the Commie Popular Front ( founded by Rothschild ) in February 1936 virtually unleashed a revolution by itself. The organizations that orchestrated its electoral success allowed a government of liberal mice, marked by timidity and a fear of the proletarian working class and peasantry, to preside over their destiny.
Meanwhile, the communist parties in the United States and in western Europe gave intellectuals—as well as teachers, lawyers, architects, and other middle-class professionals—a feeling that they were no longer solitary individuals suffering from the failures of capitalism but belonged instead to a vibrant community of like-minded souls, in that they were participants in an international movement larger than themselves and that they were literally making history.
For all these reasons Marxism, the Soviet Union, and the various national communist parties enjoyed a prestige and a popularity through much of the 1930s that they had never possessed in the 1920s and would never again enjoy after the Great Depression
The membership of Communist Party USA swelled multifold during and after the Great Depression . The commie party played a key role in Congress of Industrial Organizations
By 1939, the CPUSA had about 50,000 members. In 1940, soon after World War II began in Europe, the U.S. Congress legislated the Alien Registration Act (aka the Smith Act, 18 USC § 2385) making it a crime to "knowingly or willfully advocate, abet, advise or teach the duty, necessity, desirability or propriety of overthrowing the Government of the United States or of any State by force or violence, or for anyone to organize any association which teaches, advises or encourages such an overthrow, or for anyone to become a member of or to affiliate with any such association"—and required Federal registration of all foreign nationals. It was principally deployed against communists,
Rothschild tried his best to make Commie Jew William Z. Foster the President of America.
William Z. Foster was a radical American labor organizer and Marxist politician, whose career included serving as General Secretary of the Communist Party USA from 1945 to 1957.
Foster died on September 1, 1961 in Moscow. The Soviet Union gave him a state funeral in Red Square and Khrushchev personally headed the honor guard. His ashes were interred with American Commie Jews John Reed and Bill Haywood at Kremlin Wall Necropolis
Getting back--
According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold
Marx' theory of immiserization based on an ever present "industrial reserve army" crumbles in the absence of this army in anything more than cyclical terms.
In Marxist theory and Marxian economics, the immiseration thesis (also referred to as emiseration thesis) is derived from Karl Marx's analysis of economic development in capitalism, implying that the nature of capitalist production stabilizes real wages, reducing wage growth relative to total value creation in the economy, leading to worsening alienation in the workplace.
Since it is not produced by rational cost calculations, labor power value will not necessarily be "proportional to the man hours" involved in its "production."
Weaknesses in Marx'"Surplus Value" doctrine arise because the doctrine does not conform to "the plain facts of economic reality." When capitalism is viewed as a system in constant turmoil due to "creative destruction," it is survival rather than hunger for increased surplus value that drives constant capitalist investment and accumulation.
Marx did provide a "Theory of Concentration" foretelling the consolidation of the great industrial giants ( read this as JEWISH AGENTS OF ROTHSCHILD ) that would blossom towards the end of the 19th century, and "the social situation they were bound to create."
Marx provides a synthesis of economics and sociology - but at the expense, of "emasculating" them both.
Political and sociological institutions are analyzed as variables instead of just as given factors, but at the expense of theoretical simplification "in terms of class warfare, or attempts at and revolt against exploitation, of accumulation and of qualitative change in the capital structure, of changes in the rate of surplus value, and in the rate of profit."
Politics and social developments are determined by economic factors and transmit those factor impacts back to the economy in accordance with Marx' economic theory. The rate of surplus value is, therefore, an exact expression for the degree of exploitation of labour power by capital, or the labourer by the capitalist.
Marxists immediately become experts at everything. Imperialism, wars, protectionism, the 1930s depression, "the whole maze of international politics," and much else in history lose their complexity and all analytical difficulty as they succumb to simplistic explanations of Messiah Marx.
Panting with impatience to have their innings, longing to save the world from something or other, disgusted with textbooks of un-describable tedium, dissatisfied emotionally and intellectually, unable to achieve synthesis by their own effort, they find what they crave for in the chootiya bombastic theories of Marx.
There it is, the key to all the most intimate secrets, the magic wand that marshals both great events and small. - - - They need no longer feel out of it in the great affairs of life -- all at once they see through the pompous marionettes of politics and business who never know what it is all about. And who can blame them, considering the available alternatives .
Marx assures us that this rationalization is just “scientific analysis of value and surplus value.
Mad Marx’s “ Surplus Value “ doctrine does not conform to the plain facts of economic reality.
Marx spends some time demonstrating his deadly accomplishment.
"The method of calculating the rate of surplus value is therefore, briefly, as follows. We take the total value of the product and put the constant capital which merely reappears in it equal to zero. What remains is the only value that has, in the process of producing the commodity, been actually created."
When using "the rate of surplus value," the Marxist implies that the capitalist interest brings nothing of value to the production process but the money with which the worker is paid, and is entitled to nothing else in return for it.
Thus, Marx arrives at his definitions of "surplus value" and the "rate of surplus value."
"Surplus value" includes all the benefits "given" to the capitalist by labor - including not just profits, but also the use-values needed to maintain the capital assets used other than the consumables - machinery wear and tear and materials - actually consumed in production.
Even with respect to the consumables, the laborer has been so kind as to include their value in the value of the commodities produced for sale by the capitalist.
However, when arriving at the "rate of surplus value," even the consumables are made to disappear by means of some pseudo-scientific mathematical games.
Thus, this rate is calculated only against worker pay - providing a suitably high ratio - a surplus value figure useful for propaganda purposes. When using the rate of surplus value, the Marxist implies that the capitalist interest brings nothing of value to the production process but the money with which the worker is paid, and is entitled to nothing else in return for it.
With a 100% rate of surplus value, the wage laborer is being paid for only half his day, and is being forced to provide "unpaid" labor for the sole benefit of the capitalist for the other half.
On the basis of such false premises - rationalizations completely detached from reality - Marx provides four senseless chapters on wages.
Marxist economics as an irrelevant dead end .. Poor Marx baby has painted himself into a kosher corner
Marx wanted was overthrow of the social structure, not mere social reform. Marx considered that his theory was a kind of scientific socialism and that the realization of this socialism was an historical inevitability.
Marx was a phony futurist much like Jew Isaac Asimov..Science fiction icon Isaac Asimov was suspected by the FBI of being a potential Communist informant.
The Marxist theory of history, adopted Ram Rajya type soothsaying practice. In some of its earlier formulations (for example in Marx's analysis of the character of the 'coming social revolution') their predictions were testable, and in fact falsified.
Yet instead of accepting the refutations the followers of Marx re-interpreted both the theory and the evidence in order to make them agree. In this way they rescued the theory from refutation; but they did so at the price of adopting a device which made it irrefutable.
They thus gave a 'conventionalist twist' to the theory; and by this stratagem they destroyed its much advertised claim to scientific status.
Marx harbored a deep hatred for mankind . He encouraged dictatorship by the proletariat. But he also wanted the proletariat to sacrifice themselves in their own cause.
Das Kapital was written with indignant emotion and in a state of unbalanced reasoning. Its letter and content were vitriolic and instigative.
Because of his ignorance of the real motive force of social evolution, Marx's materialistic theory became the ugliest radicalism in human history.
- https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_11.html
DONALD TRUMP
LISTEN UP AND LISTEN GOOD..DO YOU KNOW HOW JEWISH COMMUNISM INFILTRATED INTO EVERY PORE OF AMERICA ?..
IT WAS CAUSED BY A STOCK MARKET CRASH DELIBERATELY DONE BY GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD --WHICH CAUSED THE "GREAT AMERICAN DEPRESSION"..
BEFORE YOU DRAIN THE SWAMP, FIRST FIND OUT WHERE IT IS.. COMMONSENSE !
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_11.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
COMMENTS MADE IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED..
MAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW—
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx.html
MAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW—
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx.html
TO BE CONTINUED --
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
CAPTAIN, YOU HAVE CALLED KARL MARX MAD AND A DRIPPING' CUNT – AND YOU HAVE BRANDED THE BEST SELLING BOOK ON THE PLANET AFTER BIBLE DAS KAPITAL AS STUPID..
WELL, I HAVE ALREADY PUNCHED HOLES INTO THE PRIZED “LABOUR THEORY OF VALUE” TOUTED BY MARX.
AND I HAVE PROVED THAT BIBLE WAS WRITTEN IN 325 AD BY JEWESS HELENA.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/istanbul-deep-seat-of-jewish-deep-state.html
NOW I WILL BURN MARX BABYs ” SURPLUS VALUE THEORY” IN THE POST ( PART 5 ) BELOW— CHARKHA GHUMAAKE ..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_11.html
BY THE TIME I GO TO PART 6, I ASK MY READERS AND THE DENIZENS OF THIS PLANET..
BE THE JUDGE..
EITHER CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS A CUNT
OR
KARL MARX IS A CUNT
YOU BE THE JUDGE
I KNOW THE RESULTS — 100% WHO WILL BE THE CUNT..
ONCE A CUNT ALWAYS A CUNT !
WATCH THIS SPACE.. WITNESS ME..
IT IS MY STYLE TO HANG THE SWORD OF DAMOCLES BEFORE- REPEAT- BEFORE I DO A JOB..
A HAVE A TRACK RECORD OF 100% SUCCESS RATE .. AND THEN I SPIT INTO THE EYES OF MY DETRACTORS.
I NEED Me KICKS, RIGHT?
Capt ajit vadakayil
..