THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 8 , BELOW--
THE POWER OF ROTHSCHILD MONOPOLIZED MEDIA IS APPARENT IN WHAT HAPPENED TWO DAYS AGO.
AT THE HOLOCAUST ANNIVERSARY, ALL DELEGATES CRIED ONLY OVER “SIX MILLION JEWS” DEAD..
NOT A WORD WAS TOLD ABOUT ROMANI GYPSIES OR THE MILLIONS OF GERMAN POWs EXTERMINATED AFTER THE END OF WW2.
JEWS KILLED WERE ANAL SEX RECEIVING JEWS KILLED BY ZIONIST JEWS.. HITLER WAS A JEW..
Marxism is the ultimate in Utopian fantasy—a delusion of morbid mind. The commies cried, -- until man obtains this higher level of social responsibility man will continue to be self centered and absorbed.
So so so-- This is where the centralized and powerful state becomes a necessity both as a means of eliminating private property and capitalism and as a means of controlling the very thought processes of people.
We saw where communism landed up all over the planet—in the shit hole.. People refuse to even spit on Communism and commie leaders today.. It is not worth the effort..
In the nature versus nurture debate communism recognizes only the later and therefore everything that is read, seen, or heard must be controlled as nothing can be allowed to interfere with the state’s creation of the socialist man.
The problem of course is that the perfect communist society is never created, it is an impossibility, and the state not only continues but becomes more powerful and totalitarian with the entire economy becoming centralized and planned and all individual initiative anesthetized..
Communism is based on a un-natural fantasy as to the nature of man and man’s ability to change his fellow man.
In Marx’s mind, shared ownership leads to better production, which in turn leads to a more balanced economic system, if the communistic “Encampment” even has an economic system.
Communism comes from the root word: Community, and the -ism variation of this, results in: The Idea of the Community - the community works as a collective, over the individual.
Because of extreme clannishness Jews have thrived under a collective system like the Jewish ghettos of Europe .. They wont allow any person of any other faith into their enclave.
Same with clannish and selfish Parsis in Mumbai, holed up in a walled fortress Cusrow Baug in Colaba , built i a prime real estate area with Opium money..
If any Parsi marries a non-Parsi he can kiss his comfortable home inside this Parsi ghetto ( has 500 homes ) goodbye..
They keep re-producing within themselves and this causes an average Parsi to go bonkers and look like a piece of shit by the time he hits the age of 50.
Commie Jew Joseph Weydemeyer called Marxism as “dictatorship of the proletariat”.. in reality “ beggars dressed up as kings”.. In Marxist philosophy, the term "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie" is the antonym to the term "dictatorship of the proletariat".
He was a friend of Marx and was involved in the writing of the manuscript of The German Ideology.The German Ideology is a set of manuscripts written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in May 1846..The text in German runs to around 700 pages
In The Communist Manifesto (1848) Marx and Engels said that "their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions Marx expanded upon his ideas about the dictatorship of the proletariat in his short 1875 work, Critique of the Gotha Program
He became a member of the League of Communists and from 1849 to 1851 headed its Frankfurt chapter. Weydemeyer formed a tiny organization, the first Marxist organization in the United States, formed in the summer of 1852.
The group, called Proletarierbund, won the attention of German immigrants with the organization of a meeting on March 20, 1853, in New York, where eight hundred German Americans assembled in Mechanics Hall and founded the American Workers League.
The ‘dictatorship of the proletariat,’ was Marx’s idea of a ‘step’ towards Communism. The first step was a revolution that removed the current governing body from power, the next was replacing that governing body with a powerful dictatorship that would maintain order while putting the economic system of Communism into action.
After a long period of time, this dictatorship would be disbanded, and a utopia would then be established without a central governing authority (hence anarchy) but rather, a paradise where everybody shares resources, land, and the means of production equally, with no social or economic statuses. This was Mad Marx’s dream for the future of the world. However, that it never came true.
Marx’s utopia falls PHUTTT on its face. The moment its achieved and people realize that there is no central authority compelling them to work and view others as equal, that moment is when the first seeds of dissent of Marx’s utopia are planted and civil war can occur, causing the reestablishment of states.
Compare East and West Germany to see why communism failed.. i have seen both sides till the Berlin wall came down..
The Eastern commie Bloc portrayed the Berlin Wall as protecting its population from fascist elements conspiring to prevent the "will of the people" from building a socialist state in East Germany.
The Berlin Wall fell on 9 November 1989.
I was in Hamburg when the Berlin wall came down.. all Germans on both sides of the wall were happy..
Helmut Kohl, the West German chancellor, began negotiations with the Soviets and the East Germans to return Germany to single nation status. Kohl paid the Kremlin some $60 billion to get Soviet troops to leave German soil. The two Germanys signed a formal reunification treaty on Aug. 31, 1990
Berlin had been a symbol of Nazi Germany and all of the Allies wanted a piece of it. Thus, West Berlin also became an island of freedom in communist East Germany. The city, with a total of 3.3 million residents, was the hotspot of the Cold War
The Jewish deep state wants North Korea to have a crypto Jew ruler..so that the rare earths of North Korea can be stolen.
People say that communism fails because it is imposed by force. It would be more exact to say that communism IS force.
Communism denies the right to private property, it thereby robs individuals of the product of their labor, and makes them slaves to those who control the state. It is inseparable from the use of force.
It is also inseparable from state-sanctioned mass-murder. To deny a man's right to property is to deny his right to life. If you can take the bread he earned from a starving man's hands--which communists have done more than once--he has no right to life.
More than 200 million people died under communist regimes in the 20th Century—yet Jews keep moaning about “Six Million Jews” killed by Hitler ghadi ghadi.. . Hitler was a Jew and an agent of Jew Rothschild..
Many of them died due to forced starvation when the state diverted food from their region in order to subdue them. Others died when the state put them in camps to "re-educate" them, and others were simply shot.
People don’t fail—they are true to themselves—ideologies fail..
There was no true independent judicial system in Commienations . Anyone who got caught up in the legal system could be brutally abused
Dictatorships are very chaotic and inefficient because you have to keep giving a cut to those who support you, do favours etc
It’s all about clinging on to power, how can you build an equal society and share the wealth when led by a dictator who has to give all the money to his supporters and the wealthy to stay in power?
Who made President Xi of China ruler for life? The people of China?
Read both parts of the post below--
All we have seen is Communism used as front for Dictatorships. What many thought was Communism was in fact Despotism in the guise of Communism.
Whatever crushed individuality is despotism.. Commie idealism is the despot of human thought— it was “believe it or else”..
Communism is not a failed ideology, it works pretty damn well in your family, can and has worked in very small societies tightly knit like having blood connections of narrow religious sentiments like the clannish Amish in USA
The Amish of USA are German crypto Jews The Amish are known for simple living, plain dress, and reluctance to adopt many conveniences of modern technology.
The Amish do not educate their children past the eighth grade, believing that the basic knowledge offered up to that point is sufficient to prepare one for the Amish lifestyle
Almost no Amish go to high school, much less to college. In many communities, the Amish operate their own schools, which are typically one-room schoolhouses with teachers (young unmarried women) from the Amish community.
The Pennsylvania Dutch are not Dutch at all as stupid Hilly Billy Yanks think . The word Dutch is a corruption of "Deutsch" or German, of which they speak an ancient dialect.
Ohio has the largest Amish population, followed by Pennsylvania and Indiana. Amish life is governed by the "Ordnung," a German word for order.
Most Amish groups forbid owning automobiles, tapping electricity from public utility lines, using self-propelled farm machinery, owning a television, radio, and computer, attending high school and college, joining the military, and initiating divorce.
The Indian Hindu joint family system, where close blood relatives lived under one roof harmoniously for millenniums is envied by the whole world.. This is the wonder of spirituality which only Sanatana Dharma provides..
The greatest thing mankind will ever accomplish is making communism work on a large scale, that is when we ascend as a species. Like the deeply spiritual Hindu Essenes with high soul frequency who wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls.
In Communist regimes you have no rights, no incentives to work hard, no freedom, no land, no nothing. Besides Communist rulers are sadist and lethal. Communism brings nothing but oppression, and poverty to the masses.
Communism is the worst idea the world has ever produced. Why? Because it simply is based upon the fact that no matter how hard you work, or how much brilliance you contribute , whatever the other lazy dimwit person earns, you will earn the same.
Anarcho-communism is a political philosophy and anarchist school of thought which advocates the abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour and private property (while retaining respect for personal property, along with collectively-owned items, goods and services) in favor of common ownership of the means of production, direct democracy, and a horizontal network of workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"
Anarcho-communism developed out of radical socialist currents after the French Revolution created by Jew Rothschild so he can steal
Commies brainwashed with stupid ideology will never understand that the capitalist system allows a worker to choose his employer and to start his own company.
This results in a competition for labor among capitalists, leading to higher wages, better working conditions and lower profits. In other words: capitalism has a tendency to move away from the conditions in which the communist revolution would occur.
Only stupid people become Commies. You wanna sit between cunts ?- go for a commie conference in Bengal or Kerala.
Firms produce things because consumers want to buy them. The distinction between use value and exchange value is a false dichotomy.
Use value refers to a product's utility in satisfying needs and wants as afforded by its material properties. Exchange value thus becomes simply the price for which a good will trade in a given market which is identical to what Marx refers to as price.
Exchange-value is the quantitative aspect of value, as opposed to “use-value” which is the qualitative aspect of value, and constitutes the substratum of the price of a commodity.
Relative prices reflect the incremental value of goods and services as a function of the technology it takes to produce them and the preferences of consumers who purchase them.
A commodity is any good or service ("products" or "activities") produced by human labour and offered as a product for general sale on the market. Some other priced goods are also treated as commodities, e.g. human labor-power, works of art and natural resources, even though they may not be produced specifically for the market, or be non-reproducible goods.
Value and price are not equivalent terms in economics, and theorising the specific relationship of value to market price is bullshit
In Marx's theory, a commodity is something that is bought and sold, or exchanged in a market.
It has value, which represents a quantity of human labor.[6] Because it has value, implies that people try to economise its use. A commodity also has a use value and an exchange value.
It has a use value because, by its intrinsic characteristics, it can satisfy some human need or want, physical or ideal. By nature this is a social use value, i.e. the object is useful not just to the producer but has a use for others generally.
It has an exchange value, meaning that a commodity can be traded for other commodities, and thus give its owner the benefit of others' labor (the labor done to produce the purchased commodity).
Price is then the monetary expression of exchange-value, but exchange value could also be expressed as a direct trading ratio between two commodities without using money, and goods could be priced using different valuations or criteria.
According to the labor theory of value, product-values in an open market are regulated by the average socially necessary labour time required to produce them, and price relativities of products are ultimately governed by the law of value.
Labor is an input. So is capital, land, managerial expertise, entrepreneurial initiative, and technology. Each is compensated in accord with its marginal productivity.
Economies are dynamic, not static. Equilibrium is perpetually in flux; inefficiencies arise. None of this is to suggest that free markets seamlessly solve all problems. But neither is it the case that profit is the root of all evil. Profit is simply the compensation for risk-taking by “capitalists.”
Profit is not theft. It is compensation for those who put capital at risk to start and run businesses. To see profit as a pile of gold hoarded by dragon Smaug is a remarkable error of economic reasoning.
The transformation of a labor-product into a commodity (its "marketing") is in reality not a simple process, but has many technical and social preconditions.
These often include the following ten main ones:--
The existence of a reliable supply of a product, or at least a surplus or surplus product.
The existence of a social need for it (a market demand) that must be met through trade, or at any event cannot be met otherwise.
The legally sanctioned assertion of private ownership rights to the commodity.
The enforcement of these rights, so that ownership is secure.
The transferability of these private rights from one owner to another.
The right to buy and sell the commodity, and/or obtain (privately) and keep income from such trade
The (physical) transferability of the commodity itself, i.e. the ability to store, package, preserve and transport it from one owner to another.
The imposition of exclusivity of access to the commodity.
The possibility of the owner to use or consume the commodity privately.
Guarantees about the quality and safety of the commodity, and possibly a guarantee of replacement or service, should it fail to function as intended.
The transformation of a labor-product into a commodity (its "marketing") is in reality not a simple process, but has many technical and social preconditions.
These often include the following ten (10) main ones:--
The existence of a reliable supply of a product, or at least a surplus or surplus product.
The existence of a social need for it (a market demand) that must be met through trade, or at any event cannot be met otherwise.
The legally sanctioned assertion of private ownership rights to the commodity.
The enforcement of these rights, so that ownership is secure.
The transferability of these private rights from one owner to another.
The right to buy and sell the commodity, and/or obtain (privately) and keep income from such trade
The (physical) transferability of the commodity itself, i.e. the ability to store, package, preserve and transport it from one owner to another.
The imposition of exclusivity of access to the commodity.
The possibility of the owner to use or consume the commodity privately.
Guarantees about the quality and safety of the commodity, and possibly a guarantee of replacement or service, should it fail to function as intended.
Thus, the "commodification" of a good or service often involves a considerable practical accomplishment in trade. It is a process that may be influenced not just by economic or technical factors, but also political and cultural factors, insofar as it involves property rights, claims to access to resources, and guarantees about quality or safety of use.
In absolute terms, exchange values can also be measured as quantities of average labour-hours. Commodities which contain the same amount of socially necessary labor have the same exchange value. By contrast, prices are normally measured in money-units. For practical purposes, prices are, however, usually preferable to labour-hours, as units of account, although in capitalist work processes the two are related to each other (see labor power).
The seven basic forms of commodity trade can be summarised as follows:--
M-C (an act of purchase: a sum of money purchases a commodity, or "money is changed into a commodity")
C-M (an act of sale: a commodity is sold for money)
M-M' (a sum of money is lent out at interest to obtain more money, or, one currency or financial claim is traded for another. "Money begets money.")
C-C' (countertrade, in which a commodity trades directly for a different commodity, with money possibly being used as an accounting referent, for example, food for oil, or weapons for diamonds)
C-M-C' (a commodity is sold for money, which buys another, different commodity with an equal or higher value)
M-C-M' (money is used to buy a commodity which is resold to obtain a larger sum of money)
M-C...P...-C'-M' (money buys means of production and labour power used in production to create a new commodity, which is sold for more money than the original outlay. "The circular course of capital")
The hyphens ("-") here refer to a transaction applying to an exchange involving goods or money; the dots in the last-mentioned circuit ("...") indicate that a value-forming process ("P") occurs in between purchase of commodities and the sales of different commodities. Thus, while at first merchants are intermediaries between producers and consumers, later capitalist production becomes an intermediary between buyers and sellers of commodities. In that case, the valuation of labour is determined by the value of its products.
The reifying effects of universalised trade in commodities, involving a process Marx calls "commodity fetishism," mean that social relations become expressed as relations between things; for example, price relations. Markets mediate a complex network of interdependencies and supply chains emerging among people who may not even know who produced the goods they buy, or where they were produced.
Since no one agency can control or regulate the myriad of transactions that occur (apart from blocking some trade here, and permitting it there), the whole of production falls under the sway of the law of value, and economics becomes a science aiming to understand market behaviour, i.e. the aggregate effects of a multitude of people interacting in markets.
How quantities of use-values are allocated in a market economy depends mainly on their exchange value, and this allocation is mediated by the "cash nexus".
In Marx's analysis of the capitalist mode of production, commodity sales increase the amount of exchange-value in the possession of the owners of capital, i.e., they yield profit and thus augment their capital (capital accumulation).
In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, any product has a labor-value and a use-value, and if it is traded as a commodity in markets, it additionally has an exchange value, most often expressed as a money-price …
We are then told that ‘a use value or useful article’ has ‘value only because human labour in the abstract has been embodied or materialized in it’…; so that use value is value as before defined plus utility of the product.
Having grasped this conception, the student of Marx is startled to learn, two pages later, that ‘a thing can be a use value, without having value,’ as air, &c. (but why call this Use value, when value is absent?) and that ‘lastly, nothing can have value without being an object of utility,’ because ‘if the thing is useless so is the labour contained in it; the labour does not count as labour, and therefore creates no value.’
The most fundamental flaw in Marx's theory of value is the premise that the value of goods is determined by their cost of production alone..
But hey, the value of a diamond is the same whether it was found by accident or whether it was found as a result of a thousand days of a miner's labour. Like I said before , sometimes Marx was high on LSD and could not think for nuts
In this modern age Das Kapital is totally irrelevant. The people who push this stupid book must be shot with their own shit
The model becomes obsolete in the context of the modern knowledge economy, where the commodity being traded is principally intellectual property.
When I employ someone to write me an iPhone app, the value of it relates almost entirely to the demand which is subsequently generated for it. If I pay my developer $1500 to write the app and it takes him a week, then I promote it and sell it to a million people for a dollar each, was his labour worth a million dollars?
Or was most of the value in the idea I had and my skill in selling it? If I fail to sell it at all, was his labour therefore worthless?
Marx's theory of value does not attribute any value to the risk taken by the entrepreneur. The entrepreneur risks his capital, time and reputation in order to provide a stable wage for the employee.
Consider a Silicon Valley startup in which the developers are paid a good wage over a period of several years to work on an application or website which generates no revenue. If the venture can monetize then the entrepreneur may gain a huge payout, but it is also highly likely that the venture will fail.
Eventually the capital will all be burned and the workers will be made redundant, but not until they have enjoyed a considerable period of gainful employment producing something of no realizable value.
Engel’s father was a cloth mill owner.. His contributions related to a Capitalist being a millowner.
Marx proposed that only labour could add value. The corollary of this is that labour-intensive industries should return higher profits than less labour-intensive industries, but there is no evidence to support this. Indeed, in the modern economy, and perhaps ironically as a consequence of Marx's work, the reverse is more likely to be true.
Marx has shifted his goal posts at will..
At his starting point: in the opening pages of Kapital, Marx starts off saying that when two things are exchanged, it is because they are of equal value, and then proceeds to derive his doctrine form that fallacious starting point.
When two things are exchanged it is because there is a double inequality of value. Value is subjective, and both people value what they are getting in the exchange more than what they are giving up. Marx’s vision was in runnel mode with blinkers on.
Marx knew perfectly well that the labor theory of value could not be a complete account of value, which is why, on the very first page of Capital, he adds the qualifier "socially necessary" ( when he was less high on LSD ) , so the value of commodities is determine by the amount of socially necessary labor value.
This is necessary because otherwise goods produced by slower workers would supposedly be worth more.
So so so-- what determines what is socially necessary ?
Is it something like ILU ILU ?
Prices do not converge on labor values. Marxian economists to this day talk about this as the "transformation problem", implying that it is some minor unsolved niggle
In 20th-century discussions of Karl Marx's economics, the transformation problem is the problem of finding a general rule by which to transform the "values" of commodities (based on their socially necessary labour content, according to his labour theory of value) into the "competitive prices" of the marketplace.
Marx’s failure to develop a consistent theory of long-run equilibrium prices on the basis of his labor theory of value.. in deriving “prices of production” that equalize profit rates across industries, Marx neglected to transform input values into prices of production because he was high on LSD again
.
Once Marx’s derivation is corrected by simultaneous pricing of the inputs, so the story goes, it is no longer true that the sum of prices = the sum of values and that total profit = total surplus value; only one of these two equalities can hold, but not both.
Moreover, under the corrected transformation the aggregate or average rate of profit in price terms is not regulated by the value rate of profit, and the latter becomes redundant.
Marxist economists have responded to this transformation problem in three ways, which at times have been combined in complex and even contradictory fashion.
One approach is to discount the importance of the problem of market price determination relative to the qualitative insights and explanatory power still obtainable from Capital’s other analyses.
In this view, Marx’s treatments of such important phenomena as industrial development, exploitation, inequality, unemployment and economic crises are not irreparably damaged by his failure to properly complete the value-price transformation.
A second response is to revise Marxist economics by jettisoning the labor theory of value, using the methods of neoclassical or Sraffian modeling. In this way, it is hoped that the strengths of Marx’s class-based and dialectical analysis can be maintained and further developed without the embarrassing analytical inconsistency revealed by the transformation problem.
A third response has been to try salvaging the consistency of the labor theory of value as a framework for long-run equilibrium price determination through various new revisions of Marx’s transformation procedure.
The transformation problem is actually a non-problem. Marx did not “neglect” to transform the inputs from values into prices of production; in reality such a transformation of input costs is not necessary or appropriate given Marx’s method of analysis.
The real source of the inconsistency in the transformation problem lies in the use of inappropriate assumptions and modeling techniques to interpret Capital. Marx’s analysis is internally consistent given his method, his purpose, and his crucial recognition of the necessity of money as a representative of value under capitalism.
How is macroeconomic production and accumulation of surplus value consistent with the conservation of value in exchange? Marx’s answer, set out in Volume I of Capital, is that in labor power capitalists find a commodity uniquely capable of producing new value through its expending of new labor in production.
This value added by living labor power is not limited by the value of labor power itself, as determined by the value of the commodities necessary for workers’ historically and physically determined subsistence. Surplus value results from the difference between the value created by workers in production and the value of the commodities purchased with workers’ wages.
Marx’s insisted that total value and surplus value are determined on the macroeconomic level prior to the microeconomic formation of prices of production, and that the aggregate value quantities are not modified by the prices of production.
The very fact that modern capitalism has highly variable organic compositions of capital and strong competition means that Marx should have seen from the beginning that there was no transformation problem.
Marx could easily have stated this in volume 1. There was no need to defer a non-existent pseudo-problem to volume 3. There was no need for Engels to announce a competition in his preface to volume 2 of Capital asking readers to try and solve the transformation problem, because there was no such problem.
Marx made his mistakes on depreciation-- he did not see that not only immediate labour, ‘living labour’ in his terminology, but prior labour used to create future value, in creating capital goods, could be a source of value and surplus value – profit.
Marx did not dispute that fixed capital goods do not transmit value to products – he says they do explicitly several times in Capital I. What Marx held falsely was this was exactly offset by depreciation so the net value product of past labour accumulation was zero.
Marx wrote that depreciation acts as a cost to be added to the value of products.
Marx wrote that Capitalists must set up a fund to cover the depreciation so that when the machine is fully worn out a new one can be replaced.
Marx assumes that the level of depreciation is equal to the level of value transferred to the final product and that this sum is equal to the depreciation fund, so that net the two cancel out and so fixed capital, when considered on the basis of the economy has a whole, supplies no net addition to value.
Engels held dogmatically that value theory proved that only living labour could create value
Nothing has any intrinsic value, nothing at all. The only value anything non-human has is the value some human places on it.Value exists within a human mind, not an external object. Marx definitely did not understand, so his theory of value was wrong. Marx, was trying to analyze something that did not exist.
a village bumpkin named Marx was told by his mother to sell their only duck as there was no bread in the house--
while he was going skippety skip to the fair-- he saw a fair girl giving him the glad eye--
she looked at this bulging crotch and said-- what a nice duck!
he stopped and said-- "if mE can fuck you, Ya can take this duck"
they fucked-- he gave her the duck-- the girl wanted an encore-- so she said
"if you fuck me once more, i'll give you , your duck back"
while he was fucking her again-- the blessed duck wandered off and got run over by a truck-
seeing him despondent, she said —“ ok, i'll give you twenty dollars for the 2nd fuck"
the bumpkin goes home hoppety hop-- his mother sees him with the dead duck under his arm
she cried " what ever happened . don’t give me you usual meandering replies.. tell me in brief so that I can understand !!"?
the bumpkin says -- let me put it this easy way--
A FUCK FOR A DUCK
A DUCK FOR A FUCK
NOW I HAVE TWENNY BUCKS
AND A FUCKED UP DUCK
AND A FUCKED UP DUCK
In Marxian economics, economic reproduction refers to recurrent (or cyclical) processes. Marx viewed reproduction as the process by which society re-created itself, both materially and socially.
Economic reproduction involves:--
the physical production and distribution of goods and services,
the trade (the circulation via exchanges and transactions) of goods and services,
the consumption of goods and services (both productive or intermediate consumption and final consumption).
the reproduction of voluntary and involuntary social relations, involving competition and cooperation (including the social relations of the class hierarchy).
Karl Marx modeled the circulation of capital, money, and commodities in Das Kapital to show how the reproduction process that must occur in any type of society can take place in capitalist society by means of the circulation of capital.
Marx distinguishes between "simple reproduction" and "expanded (or enlarged) reproduction". In the former case, no economic growth occurs, while in the latter case, more is produced than is needed to maintain the economy at the given level, making economic growth possible.
In the capitalist mode of production, the difference is that in the former case, the new surplus value created by wage-labour is spent by the employer on consumption (or hoarded), whereas in the latter case, part of it is reinvested in production.
As an approach to studying economic activity, economic reproduction contrasts with equilibrium economics, because economic reproduction is concerned not with statics or with how economic development gravitates towards an equilibrium, but rather with dynamics—that is, the motion of an economy.
It is not concerned with the conditions of a perfect match between supply and demand under ideal conditions but rather with the quantitative proportions between different economic activities or sectors that are necessary in any real economy so that economic activity can continue and grow. It is concerned with all the conditions for that, including the social and technical conditions necessary for the economic process.
Reproduction economics does not assume that society is kept in balance by market mechanisms.
In Marx's model, the output in an accounting period is normally always higher in value than the input. This is what Marx believed capitalists to be in business for: to produce a product sold at a higher value than the sum of input costs, thus generating profit. The profit in Marx's theory is not an "input" (it is not part of the capital advanced), but a business result, the yield of capital on an investment.
In Marx's view, economic reproduction in any society has five main features:--
the production of reproducible products (goods or services) replacing, maintaining, or adding to the stock of society's physical assets
the physical maintenance of the (working) population and their dependents through household consumption
the reproduction and growth of the total population, including procreation and childrearing
the reproduction, enforcement, and maintenance of social relations, in particular the relations of production that characterize the social hierarchy, and property rights
the maintenance and reproduction of trading and distribution relations (the systems, institutions, and organizations enabling market trade and non-market allocation of resources)
Marx's argument is that by producing an output value the equivalent to their own labor cost plus a surplus value (or gross profit) appropriated by capitalists, waged workers accomplish many of the processes involved at the same time.
According to Marx, in a capitalist society, economic reproduction is conditional on capital accumulation. If workers fail to produce more capital, economic reproduction begins to break down.
Therefore, economic reproduction in capitalist society is necessarily expanded reproduction and requires market growth. Capital must grow, otherwise the whole process breaks down. Thus, economic growth is not simply desirable but also necessary in capitalism, not just because of population growth, but for commercial reasons.
Marx did not go into detail about how capitalist business reshapes, reorganizes, and restructures the mode of consumption so that it becomes more profitable. He concerned himself primarily with the capitalist mode of production, not with the capitalist mode of consumption..
Marx did not analyze the effects of human capital—that is, the skills and knowledge lodged in the physical bodies of workers, and the very large sums of money invested into education systems..
the stock of skills and knowledge in the economy can represent a very large tradable value, which can profoundly influence economic relationships, insofar as workers can increase their income because they possess specialized skills and knowledge.
Considerable money is spent on education and research and development in developed capitalist countries.
In his theory of capital, Marx failed to consider the importance and weight of the non-capitalist production activities that must occur to sustain capitalist production (a significant component of which is household labour; see below). He was primarily concerned to show that the reproduction of society as a whole could in principle be accomplished by means of the accumulation of capital.
Marx failed to systematically theorize the impact of demographic effects on economic reproduction,
Marx did not analyze in any detail the effect of taxation and state expenditures on the reproduction process. Marx did not analyze in detail the depletion of natural resources by capitalist production, where the depletion involves non-reproducible goods, or living organisms that are wiped out.
If land is exhausted or becomes infertile, or if it is devastated by a natural disaster, or if the yield of mines, forests, and fisheries becomes too low, production can no longer continue. After a series of cycles of capitalist reproduction, environments may emerge that are no longer inhabitable by human beings because they are incapable any longer of sustaining life.
For Marx, the production and consumption of society are both held by one another in a balance that necessitates reproduction.. Capitalism is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production.
In Marx’s Capital, he defines simple reproduction as both the reproduction of base capital for the capitalist and the reproduction of labor power for the worker. Both reproductions are important to not only the survival of each individual, but, Marx argues, for society as a whole.
Marx says, “no society can go on producing, in other words no society can reproduce, unless it constantly reconverts a part of its products into means of production, or elements of fresh products.”
For Marx, the production and consumption of society are both held by one another in a balance that necessitates reproduction. “A society,” says Marx on page 711, the second sentence of the chapter devoted to simple reproduction, “can no more cease to produce than it can cease to consume.” Reproduction of this kind, i.e. simple reproduction, is a combination of consumption and production.
The whole Das Kapital river runs into one single sea: the production / reproduction model.
Value, as a result of human efforts may be present in two ways: present work and past work.
What gone wrong on marxian explanations is not accounting past work (which includes intellectual work)...
Marx, saw the "troubled waters" beneath the theory and prefer to stay dry on the bridge of generality.
To save "the model" was more important than such details as market clearances to him.
the prices of goods and services in a market is based on Supply and Demand (economics), not how long or hard labor had to work to produce it. If the Labor Theory of Value were valid then a buggy whip would command a price in a world mostly without buggies.
The Labor Theory of Value was cooked up to prove how the Big Bad Capitalists were robbing the honest Sons of Toil blind and stripping them naked. The mad theory of Marx killed more than 200 million people
Mad Marx, argued that changes in technology, and specifically productive technology, are the primary influence on human social relations and organizational structure, and that social relations and cultural practices ultimately revolve around the technological and economic base of a given society.
Technological determinism has been summarized as 'The belief in technology as a key governing force in society’
Technological determinism is a reductionist theory that assumes that a society's technology determines the development of its social structure and cultural values. ... Marx's position has become embedded in contemporary society, where the idea that fast-changing technologies alter human lives is pervasive.
"The Handmill gives you society with the feudal lord: the steam-mill, society with the industrial capitalist" (The Poverty of Philosophy, 1847—Karl Marx)
Jews embraced communism like no other ethnic or religious group in the west. After all almost all these commie philosopher cunts were Jews.
After the war, in 1949, the American Communist Party which numbered less than 60,000 members was 70% Jewish. These Jews did not have the interests of the nation , they were all traitors who had only extremely clannish Jewish interests in mind.. Rothschild’s media will never talk about this naked truth
During the Popular Front period of the 1930s, the Communist Party USA famously adopted as its slogan “Communism is twentieth-century Americanism.” But for communist Jews, being Red was a way of asserting their radical difference, rather than their right to belong in American society.
Rothschild created Jewish organizations like ADL and AIPAC to protect the wicked nay evil Jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Defamation_League
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Israel_Public_Affairs_Committee
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_lobby_in_the_United_States
Commie Jews are the termites of America..
In the 21st century, with communism long dead, Jews still want to express their difference from mainstream America.
But they rarely choose revolutionary politics as their means of expression. Instead, religious observance, commitment to Israel, and work for social justice are the main ways that Jews proclaim their identity.
Rather than looking backward with yearning toward a true Red past, Jews should rejoice that most of us were free from the illusion that warped so many minds and lives and that America was spared what so many other countries had to endure: the coming to pass of Marx’s chootiya vision.
Marx was a failure as a prophet, in spite of the fact that he inspired ( sic) revolutions that changed the course of history. Balls Marx inspired anybody.. Jew Rothschild fired over the shoulders of Marx, to steal
His essential idea, influenced by Ricardo, was that capitalism would become less and less profitable and that its downward spiral toward the abyss of deflation—lower prices, lower profits—would be followed by worldwide revolution. Instead, capitalism has become vastly more profitable.
Tunnel visioned Marx failed to predict the emergence of a new major class…the bureaucratic control class of middle managers, corporate lawyers, government bureaucrats of all sort.
This was brought about by the huge growth of both corporate ventures and the state, so that day to day management had to be ceded to an intermediate controlling class.
JEW ROTHSCHILD TOOK OVER BUREAUCRACY ( NOMENKLATURA ) IN INDIA BY INJECTING INDOCTRINATED COMMIES FROM JNU / DU/ JU ..
HE USED AMERICAN COMMIE UNIVERSITIES ( BERKELEY UC/ COLUMBIA ) PACKED WITH JEWISH COMMIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPTS TO BRAINWASH INDIAN PROFESSORS..
OUR SOCIAL SCIENCES PROFESSORS OF JNU/ JU/ DU/ TISS/ IITs ARE A COLLEGIUM SYSTEM , CHOSEN BY WHITE SKINNED COMMIE JEWS
BELOW: THIS COMMIE JNU FEMALE PROFESSOR IS TALKING ABOUT PEACEFUL NON-VIOLENT VEGAN HINDUS
BELOW: THIS COMMIE JNU FEMALE PROFESSOR IS TALKING ABOUT PEACEFUL NON-VIOLENT VEGAN HINDUS
Read all 11 parts of the pst below--
OUR COMMIE LUTYENS BABUS HAS NO LOVE FOR THEIR MOTHERLAND.. THEY LOVED THE FOREIGN SILVER MORE. THEIR CHILDREN GET SCHOLARSHIPS IN ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM FOUNDED WESTERN UNIVERSITIES..
95% OF THE BABUS ( NOMENKLATURA ) IN OUR CRITICAL MINISTRIES ARE TRAITORS TODAY.. THESE TRAITORS ARE PROTECTED BY OUR ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA.
Marx mistakenly believed that the key strategy for working class victory in the class war was the creation of worker political parties to “win the battle of democracy”
Electoral democracy created by Jew Rothschild was only in its infancy in Marx’s day, so Marx ended up having a way too optimistic view of what could be accomplished through electoral politics.
ROTHSCHILD CONVERTED ALMOST THE WHOLE PLANET TO ELECTORAL DEMOCRACIES.
BUT HEY, HE MAINTAINED SOME KINGDOMS RULED BY DESPOT KINGS — ALL OF WHICH WERE SUPER RICH IN OIL.
ROTHSCHILD FIRST CONVERTED THE RULING BLOODLINES TO JEWISH, SO THAT HE CAN STEAL
Read all 5 parts..
Lawrence of Arabia was a white Jew, an agent of Rothschild.. His Jewess wife ( daughter of French Jew Michael Harry Nedou ) would later marry Sheikh Abdullah..
THE 2008 GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRASH, WHICH SOME SAW AS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF CAPITALISM IN CRISIS, JUST AS MARX HAD PREDICTED WAS A FALSE FLAG ATTACK -- A FUTILE ATTEMPT BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO PROVE THAT HIS PROTÉGÉ MARX WAS RIGHT
FOR MARX, CONSCIOUSNESS DESCRIBES A PERSON'S POLITICAL SENSE OF SELF. THAT IS, CONSCIOUSNESS DESCRIBES A PERSON'S AWARENESS OF POLITICS. THIS IS HOW BIG A DRIPPIN’ CUNT MARX WAS..
Two big failed predictions of Marx were that the working class in advanced industrial capitalism would tend to be revolutionary, and that advanced industrial capitalism provided the most fertile grounds for a transition to communism.
Marginalism is a theory of economics that attempts to explain the discrepancy in the value of goods and services by reference to their secondary, or marginal, utility. The reason why the price of diamonds is higher than that of water, for example, owes to the greater additional satisfaction of the diamonds over the water. Thus, while the water has greater total utility, the diamond has greater marginal utility.
The Marxist apparatus only claims Utopia, but it never comes
Marxism is too abstract and doctrinal. There was no practical value.. Marxism gives undue prominence to class war. Economy is not only determining factor in history. Marxism is mistaken in denying the eternal and universal principles of moral conduct.
George Orwell in “The Animal Farm” shows how another hierarchy forms along the lines of the old one, because, alas, some animals will always be “more equal” than others and, despite the dreams and the theories, no society has been able to dispense with hierarchy.
In political theory and particularly Marxism, class consciousness is the set of beliefs that a person holds regarding their social class or economic rank in society, the structure of their class, and their class interests.
According to Karl Marx, it is an awareness that is key to sparking a revolution that would "create a dictatorship of the proletariat, transforming it from a wage-earning, property-less mass into the ruling class"
The relationship between philosophy and Marxism has always been an awkward one. ‘Philosophy stands to the study of the real world in the same relationship as masturbation stands to real sexual love,’ said Marx
By "class consciousness", Marx make the distinction between "class in itself", which is defined as a category of people having a common relation to the means of production; and a "class for itself", which is defined as a stratum organized in active pursuit of its own interests
Defining a person's social class can be a determinant for their awareness of it. Marxists define classes on the basis of their relation to the means of production, especially on whether they own capital.
In Joker movie we get to see a pseudo Marxist revolution. You see, economic inequality was driving the city apart. The city had divided along these two lines: the super-wealthy and everyone else — bourgeoisie and proletariat.
In the Essence of Christianity there is another indication of a theory of the origins of religion. Jew Ludwig Feuerbach says:
“Nature listens not to the plaints of man, it is callous to his sorrows. Hence man turns away from Nature, from all visible objects. He turns within, that here, sheltered and hidden from the inexorable powers, he may find audience for his griefs. Here he utters his oppressive secrets; here he gives vent to his stifled sighs. This open-air of the heart, this outspoken secret, this uttered sorrow of the soul, is God. God is a tear of love, shed in the deepest concealment over human misery. "God is an unutterable sigh, lying in the depths of the heart.”
Later we will find that some of the comments Marx makes on religion and God are reminiscent of this statement of Feuerbach.
Dialectical materialism, is a philosophical approach to reality derived from the teachings of Karl Marx . ... They did not deny the reality of mental or spiritual processes but affirmed that ideas could arise, therefore, only as products and reflections of material conditions
The writings of Marx were studied like religious texts. That is why Stalin liquidated the editors of the Marx-Engels Historisch-Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Rjazanov and Adoratskij, as their work threatened to reveal that Marx had feet of clay.
A year before the Revolutions of 1848, Marx and Engels thus wrote The Communist Manifesto, which was prepared to an imminent revolution and ended with the famous cry: "Proletarians of all countries, unite!".
Marx would later arrive to his theory of commodity fetishism, exposed in the first chapter of the first book of Das Kapital (1867).
In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, commodity fetishism is the perception of the social relationships involved in production not as relationships among people, but as economic relationships among the money and commodities exchanged in market trade. As such, commodity fetishism transforms the subjective, abstract aspects of economic value into objective, real things that people believe have intrinsic value
Marx borrowed the concept of "fetishism" from The Cult of Fetish Gods (1760) by Charles de Brosses, which proposed a materialist theory of the origin of religion
The value-form or form of value is a concept in Karl Marx's critique of political economy.
It refers to the social form of a tradeable thing as a symbol of value, which contrasts with its physical features, as an object which can satisfy some human need or serves a useful purpose.The physical appearance of a commodity is directly observable, but the meaning of its social form (as an object of value) is not.
Narrating the paradoxical oddities and metaphysical niceties of ordinary things when they become instruments of trade, Marx seeks to provide a brief morphology of the category of economic value as such—what its substance really is, the forms which this substance takes, and how its magnitude is determined or expressed.
He analyzes the forms of value in the first instance by considering the meaning of the value-relationship that exists between two quantities of commodities.
In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, commodity fetishism is the perception of certain relationships (especially production and exchange) not as relationships among people, but as social relationships among things (the money and commodities exchanged in market trade). As a form of reification, commodity fetishism transforms the intersubjective, abstract aspects of economic value into things that people believe have intrinsic value.
Marx explained the sociological concept underlying commodity fetishism thus:
As against this, the commodity-form, and the value-relation of the products of labour within which it appears, have absolutely no connection with the physical nature of the commodity and the material relations arising out of this. It is nothing but the definite social relation between men themselves which assumes here, for them, the fantastic form of a relation between things.
In order, therefore, to find an analogy we must take flight into the misty realm of religion. There the products of the human brain appear as autonomous figures endowed with a life of their own, which enter into relations both with each other and with the human race.
So it is in the world of commodities with the products of men's hands. I call this the fetishism which attaches itself to the products of labour as soon as they are produced as commodities, and is therefore inseparable from the production of commodities
Karl Marx did apply the concepts of fetish and fetishism, derived from economic and ethnologic studies, to the development of the theory of commodity fetishism, wherein an economic abstraction (value) is psychologically transformed (reified) into an object, which people choose to believe has an intrinsic value, in and of itself
In Das Kapital Marx expressed a desire to reveal “the economic law of motion of modern society” and laid out his theory of capitalism as a dynamic system that contained the seeds of its own self-destruction and subsequent triumph of communism
Marx's economics took as its starting point the work of the best-known economists of his day, the British classical economists Adam Smith, Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo.
Jew David Ricardo (1772-1823) was a classical British economist best known for his theory on wages and profit, labor theory of value, theory of comparative advantage, and theory of rents. David Ricardo and several other economists also simultaneously and independently discovered the law of diminishing marginal returns
In The Wealth of Nations (1776), Smith argued that the most important characteristic of a market economy was that it permitted a rapid growth in productive abilities. Smith claimed that a growing market stimulated a greater "division of labor" (i.e. specialization of businesses and/or workers) and in turn this led to greater productivity.
Although Smith generally said little about laborers, he did note that an increased division of labor could at some point cause harm to those whose jobs became narrower and narrower as the division of labor expanded. Smith maintained that a laissez-faire economy would naturally correct itself over time.
Adam Smith was the "one man think tank" to the owner of British East India Company. Rather he was the adviser to Robert Clive, the henchman of Rothschild.. Much later he would advise Rothschild on how to set up his banking cartel and set up a blue print on how to control the world.
The world has been taken over by a handful of business powers as per the blue print of Adam Smith , who dominate the natural resources we need to live, while controlling the money that we need to obtain these resources.
Adam Smith used his deception model to end the Mughal Empire in India. There was supposed to be a great heroic Battle of Plassey in 1757, for the British East India Company under Robert Clive to take over India.
Adam Smith ( born 5 June 1723 – died 17 July 1790) took ten years to write his economics gospel by way of a book “The Wealth of Nations “ , publishing it in 1776. . He never married, and he used to walk like a CHAKKA. He was delusional too, sometimes in a morbid manner..
He is also said to have put bread and butter into a teapot, drunk the concoction, upped his ante and made a hue and cry over the quality of tea . Another time our man Adam Smith without as much as a “by your leave” went out sleep walking in his nightgown in broad daylight and ended up 24 km outside of town, before nearby church bells brought him back to reality.
His house used to look like a garbage dump as he hoarded everything. Adam Smith had OCD or obsessive compulsive disorder
Much later in 1799, Rothschild would murder Tipu Sultan , and then make a huge pretense of a great war. By now Adam Smith was dead and gone. But the blue print was his alone.
Amartya Sen’s Rothschild Jewess wife in THE expert on Adam Smith economics
Indian Nobel prize winner , Amartya Sen's third wife is Emma Rothschild, who is the direct blood sister of Amschel Mayor James Rothschild.
When such people write the gospel of economics, " The Weath Of Nations" you know what you will get. Much later Milton Friedman effectively took many of the basic principles set forth by Adam Smith and the classical economists and modernized them. This is the reason why economists fall into the same hole again and again and again.
The heavy part comes now-- let me crack a quintessential "Economist " joke, to cheer you up.
These dorks are so full of themselves .
Experienced economist and not so experienced economist are walking down Oxford street.
They get across shit lying on the asphalt.
Experienced economist: "If you eat it I'll give you $20,000!"
Not so experienced economist runs his optimization program on his I7 procesor laptop and figures out he's better off eating it so he does and collects money.
Continuing along the same road they almost step into yet another pice of turd.
The not so experienced economist: "Now, if YOU eat this shit I'll give YOU $20,000."
After evaluating the proposal , our experienced economist eats shit and pockets the moolah.
They go on.
The not so experienced economist starts thinking aloud : "Listen, we both have the same amount of money we had before, but we both ate shit. I don't see us being better off."
Experienced economist: "Well, that's true, but you overlooked the fact that we've been just involved in $40,000 of fucking trade."
Adam Smith (1776) defined what was then called political economy as "an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations".
Economists use gross domestic product (GDP) to keep track of how an economy is doing, which is a flawed way. GDP measures the value of all final goods and services produced in an economy in a given period of time, usually a quarter or a year. So a recession occurs when GDP is decreasing. A boom occurs when GDP is increasing.
The assessment of economic growth based on Gross Domestic Product is a fallacy, because GDP is merely a measure of the amount of money in an economy. The one thing it does not measure, which is central to economic progress (note progress, not growth), is the level of entrepreneurial activity in a country like India. Don’t believe me , just take a flight to Coimbatore or Ludhiana . This has important implications for the efficacy of government interventions and solutions to the current economic crisis.
On a ship I judge an officer by his future potential. NOT by what he did in the past. At sea we look ahead and we do NOT look too much into the rear.
GDP is basically the sum total of recorded business activity at the consumption level plus government spending expressed in money terms. If the government spends more, GDP rises; give more money to consumers, GDP rises; give more bank credit to consumers or business, GDP rises. Cut government spending, GDP falls. This is not contentious and has nothing to do with economic progress.
Importantly, it excludes future entrepreneurial activity, except to the extent that an entrepreneur has actually spent some money putting his future plans into action. The obsession with GDP means that entrepreneurial activity, which is Adam Smith’s unseen hand that guides our future, is invisible to economic planners.
Indian farmers who were NOT playing ball and resisting Opium cultivation in their fertile fields were forbidden to plant food. This was on Adam Smith’s advise to Warren Hastings. This caused Indian famers to be shipped abroad as slaves..
“Famine has never risen from any other cause but the violence of government attempting by improper means, to remedy the inconvenience of dearth.” – Adam Smith
Adam Smith was responsible for the Chinese Opium misery. It was his idea.
His theory was-- EVERY MAN IS ALLOWED TO PURSUE HIS HEDONISTIC DESIRES TO A LAWFUL CONCLUSION, AND THAT OPIUM IS A "LEGITIMATE PRODUCT" . ( If you want to know what is Hedonism , go to Negril Jamaica , and check out drugged orgies on the open beach in broad daylight -- own pleasure first ! screw everybody else !!) ALL OBSTACLES TO BUYING CHEAP AND SELLING DEAR MUST BE REMOVED, WHICH IS THE CORE OF GLOBALISATION...
Emma R0thschild's has also done a good job of white washing hedonist and East India company employee, Adam Smith vide her book ECONOMIC SENTIMENTS.
Adam Smith's brilliance cannot be questioned with economists around you,unless you want to be insulted. Any errors he made were excused as the inevitable flaws of any great IQ absent minded professor..
'Adam Smith ties' were worn as a badge of honour in the upper echelons of the Reagan Administration. Nobody would wear a Hitler tie, right?
Marxists, hail Adam Smith as the ultimate inspiration of their own Founding Father, German Jew Karl Marx, who was related to Rothschild.. Indeed, if the average person were asked to name two economists in history whom he has heard of, Smith and Marx would probably be the runaway winners of the poll.
Adam Smith originated nothing that was true, and whatever he originated was bull. Adam Smith was a shameless plagiarist, from the works of Richard Cantillon.
Have you seen our own mediocre economist Amartya Sen lisp the word “model” in every third sentence ? He wants to stand out as a brilliant guy of the Adam Smith school, which is so dear to his Rothschild wife ( third one )..
Modern economics is obsessed with modelling. If an economist does NOT say the world model or even hear it, he will go crazy with withdrawal symptoms.
What is a model?
Models describe a situation, and describe how that situation would be changed by a given set of event—demand and supply. A mathematical model as a predictive tool to demonstrate the outcome of events in this complex world run by human emotions — is for the gullible.
Economists are pretenders who use formal mathematical techniques to understand, and hold your breath - accurately predict the result of changes in the economy . The truth is that these stupid models can never accurately predict the future.
When you fire a gun you know where the bullet will make a hole. But hey, our modern economists baffle you with bull, that they can accurately model the trajectories of prices, employment and interest rates .
An economist with mediocre brains ( otherwise he would be a rocket scientist ) pretends to be a master of all trades - philosophers, social engineers, historians, sooth sayers, mathematicians, statisticians, political scientists, sociologists and psychologists, among many other things. The math equation is difficult to comprehend , as it is nonsense.
Yet economics — and economic decisions, from the macro to the micro level — is a human subject NOT math. It is subtle and psychological and sporadic. A human subject requires human language, human emotion, human intuition. The grand theoretical-mathematical approach to economics is nonsense...
The pseudo-scientific school of mathematical economics if for the perfect world run by robots without emotions— where even the weather is math controlled and there can be no domino effects-- where there is no subtlety or ambiguity or uncertainty.
Adam Smith copied from Cantillon's Essai .
Adam Smith lifted Cantillon’s sustenance theory of wages—whole sale.
Adam Smith not only contributed nothing of value to economic thought; his economics was a grave deterioration from his predecessors.
The mystery of Adam Smith, then, is the immense gap between a trumped up reputation ( ashe rubbed shoulders with Rothschild ) and the sordid reality. The Wealth of Nations was made to blind all men, economists and laymen alike.
The Wealth of Nations exerted such a colossal impact on the world thanks to Rothschild and East India Company, that all knowledge of previous economists was blotted out, hence Smith's reputation as Founding Father.
Adam Smith, who laid out the blue print for fooling naive Indians into the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, so that opium traders Rothschild can take over India, officially. He was responsible for the Chinese Opium misery. It was his idea.
The fundamental Perspective as put forth by early free market economists, like Adam Smith, is that self interest and competition leads to social prosperity, as the act of competition creates incentive, which motivates people to persevere.
Enough of false god and plagiarist Adam Smith and his reflected brilliance!
Marx followed Adam Smith by claiming that the most important beneficial economic consequence of capitalism was a rapid growth in productivity abilities. Marx also expanded greatly on the notion that laborers could come to harm as capitalism became more productive.
Rousseau was one of the first modern writers to seriously attack the institution of private property and therefore is sometimes considered a forebear of modern socialism and communism, Marx rarely mentions Rousseau in his writings.
According to Marx, bourgeois society and ideology as it is based on the ideas of the bourgeois class. The world through a consciousness living in such a society is a fantasy world, unreal, far from real life. ... Communism aims at restoring the balance between consciousness and reality
BASTARD MARX MURDERED THE MEANING OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Historical materialism, also known as the materialist conception of history, is a methodology used by some communist and Marxist historiographers that focuses on human societies and their development through history, arguing that history is the result of material conditions rather than ideas. This was first articulated by Karl Marx as the "materialist conception of history".
It is principally a theory of history which asserts that the material conditions of a society's mode of production or in Marxist terms, the union of a society's productive forces and relations of production, fundamentally determine society's organization and development. Historical materialism is an example of Marx and Engel's scientific socialism, attempting to show that socialism and communism are scientific necessities rather than philosophical ideals
Historical materialism is materialist as it does not believe that history has been driven by individual's consciousness or ideals, but rather ascribes to the philosophical monism that matter is the fundamental substance of nature and henceforth the driving force in all of world history; this drove Marx and other historical materialists to abandon ideas such as rights (e.g. "right to life, liberty, and property" as liberalism professed)
Capitalists are not working together to achieve a common goal. Instead they spend a lot of resources on getting in each other's way. Marx felt that society could gain a lot from eliminating this waste.
Whenever something evil happens somewhere a capitalist profits. Marx was sure of that. That way capitalism is the root of all evil.
THE ROOT CAUSE OF ALL THIS EVIL IS PRIVATE PROPERTY ITSELF, ACCORDING TO MARX ( ONLY ROTHSCHILD AND HIS JEWISH AGENTS CAN OWN PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHT? )
ROTHSCHILD CREATED COMMUNISM IN INDIA BY CHOOSING AGENTS WHO WERE HONEY TRAPPED BY JEWESS WHORES
Marx’s theory of political economy was used in the USSR to pretend that all value in the world comes from manual labor. Readers of Marx today should study the rise and the fall of the USSR in the 20th century.
Capt Ajit Vadakayil declares -- Marx was not a philosopher at all-- he was not even a thinker .
At best he was a FAILED political economist, whose ridiculous nay stupid theory now belongs to the trashcan of history.
Rothschild’s blood relative Marx was the first political economist: i.e. the first to really focus on the interrelationship between economic systems and political structures.
Political economy is a social science that studies production, trade, and their relationship with the law and the government.
According to the labor theory of value, the value of something is determined by the amount of labor used to produce it. So consider the following case. One man goes out panning for gold and at the end of a 10-hour day has enough grains of gold to make an ounce. Another man goes walking along and in 1 minute, trips over a stone. He picks it up and it’s a gold nugget. Labor input? Ten hours vs. one minute. Value: the same.
Marx reduced man to a single, economic dimension of his existence. For Marx, there was no such thing as mankind. There was no common humanity sharing essentially the same outlook, capabilities and potentialities.
For him, man was rigidly defined by the economic class he was born into. This not only prescribed his economic role, it imprisoned him in a particular, class-bound reality – one he could never escape or transcend.
So for Marx, there was no such thing as economics, politics and ethics, applicable to all thinking and feeling men, but only ‘proletarian’ or ‘bourgeois’ economics, politics and ethics.
For Marx, there was no single reality, therefore, but multiple, mutually incomprehensible realities. Class identity determined everything else.
Marx made an art form of both historical determinism and the idea of utopia. History, he argued, was on a single set of tracks which, allowing for twists and turns (his pretentious but profoundly hollow dialectic), would inevitably end at the prescribed destination: a make-believe communism offering prosperity for all, freedom and the elimination of all injustice.
Marx, ever the cynical polemicist, knew this combination of (pseudo-) science, prophecy and moralism would be an unstoppable propaganda tool, as it proved to be. It allowed Marx and his followers to lay exclusive claim to the future.
Any dissenting perspective could be dismissed not only as outmoded thinking, but as ethically wrong. History and the better world it promised, Marx kept reminding us, was on the proletariat’s side. The young and those on the make, in his day, found that irresistible.
A polemic is contentious rhetoric that is intended to support a specific position by aggressive claims and undermining of the opposing position. Polemics are mostly seen in arguments about controversial topics. Polemics often concern issues in religion or politics.
Marx was the arch anti-empiricist. Nothing could disprove his bullshit theory or mad vision..
Marx embraced Plato’s ( died 347 BC ) idea that only the chosen few, the philosopher kings, were able to glimpse reality. Plato studied in Kodungallur University Kerala , owned by the Calicut king…
Plato’s student Aristotle was the only ancient Greek scholar who did not study in Kodungallur Univeristy.. All ancient Greek scholars stole knowledge and patented it I their own names. After which they were blackballed and Greek knowledge suddenly dried up like water in the hot desert sands..
For Marx, only the Marxist intellectuals could shake off their class background and truly understand the world. The uninitiated, lacking this exclusive scientific knowledge, could be treated with contempt. Intelligent lay skepticism and reasoned debate are ruled out.
.
.
Marxism = Labor theory of value (Economic theory) + Political ideology + Sociology theory + Philosophical method.
Marx baby’s last word on philosophy was "philosophers have only interepreted the world the point is to change it"
Marxism is based on the fact that as long as Capitalism lasts, the overwhelming majority of the worlds workers will never have their needs met
Marx believed that the final collapse of capitalism would come when the workers gained class consciousness. Once this occurred, they would overwhelm the bourgeoisie and take control of the means of production.
It would be a worldwide revolution, not in a single country. It would be a violent revolution.
It's deplorable how many people still venerate Mad Marx as a visionary after the immiseration and death of tens of millions who had the misfortune to live in societies led by zealots pursuing his dream of a socialist utopia.
Marx wrote thousands of pages cataloging capitalism's ills, both real and imagined, but precious few about the organization and functioning of the (purportedly) superior socialist society that would inevitably supplant it. He just asserted its superiority.
Marx wrote thousands of pages cataloging capitalism's ills, both real and imagined, but precious few about the organization and functioning of the (purportedly) superior socialist society that would inevitably supplant it. He just asserted its superiority.
Marxists do not see history as a mere series of isolated facts but rather, they seek to discover the general processes and laws that govern nature and society
For social sciences, Marx introduced the 'histomat' idea ( historical materialism ), the notion that people are largely motivated by materialism rather than by religious or ideological reasons .. It states that a society's economic organization fundamentally determine its social institutions.
Marxist theory of history that regards material economic forces as the base on which sociopolitical institutions and ideas are built. A society's economic organization fundamentally determine its social institutions
It states that the material conditions of the mode of production determines its organisation and more importantly its development i.e. how goods are made influences society, and how society changes over time. ... Historical materialism is also central towards a Marxist conception of the political world.
According to Marxist theory, class consciousness is an awareness of one's social and/or economic class relative to others, as well as an understanding of the economic rank of the class to which you belong in the context of the larger society.
In addition, class consciousness involves an understanding of the defining social and economic characteristics and collective interests of your own class within the constructs of the given socio-economic and political order.
Class consciousness is a core facet of Marx's theory of class conflict, which focuses on the social, economic, and political relationships between workers and owners within a capitalist economy. The precept was developed in conjunction with his theory on how workers might overthrow the system of capitalism and then go on to create a new economic, social, and political system based on equality rather than inequality and exploitation.
Marx perceived class as the relationship of people to the means of production—the owners versus the workers.
In the Poverty of Philosophy Marx writes that human beings are "both the authors and the actors of their own drama."
Marx draws on his formulation of base and superstructure. Historical development is the reflection of changes in the economic and material relations of the base. When the base changes, a revolutionary class becomes the new ruling class that forms the superstructure.
During revolution, the revolutionary class makes certain that its ideas appeal to humanity in general so that after a successful revolution these ideas appear natural and universal. These ideas, which the super-structural elements of society propagate, then become the governing ideology of the historical period.
Furthermore, the governing ideology mystifies the economic relations of society and therefore places the proletariat in a state of false consciousness that serves to reproduce the working class.
Morality, religion, metaphysics, all the rest of ideology and their corresponding forms of consciousness no longer retain the semblance of independence; they have no history and no development; but men, developing their material production and their material intercourse, alter, along with their real existence, their thinking and the products of their collective thinking.
Communism simply couldn't account for human behaivor. We need things to strive for and if you can't offer reward, the only alternative is to offer fear. Marxism can be defended with heavy mathematical formulas and obscure models but the reality will never become the utopian dream it was meant to be.
The inherent flaw in Marx's Communism is the idea that society is divided into workers and managers and the two are different species.
Marx was an inept "economist" who got nearly every basic precept wrong. Mare totally mis-read where economic development was heading because he ignored evidence that would contradict his thesis.
Marx was just another fantasist inventing a secular religion that would have baleful consequences around the world when adopted by chancers and thugs to provide cover for their self-aggrandizement. Given how vile a personality Marx was, this outcome was hardly a surprise.
The Marxist search for the laws of historical development, along with the operating manual for capitalism, is akin to an intensive search for Peter Rabbit. The reason that bunny has not been found, as of yet, is not because there is insufficient research on the issue.
The reason Peter Rabbit remains so elusive is that the fucker doesn't exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tale_of_Peter_Rabbit
Marx went down the rabbit-hold in search of Peter. His replacement utopia ends up nowhere by expecting too much of human beings.
Only a mad man like Marx can assume that that profound human activities are akin to mechanisms.
At leftist meetings, Marx always bullied and humiliated anyone who tried to disagree with his theses. He had Rothschild’s mafia and monopolized media working for him.
This combination of “ bestowed brilliance”, controversy and self-promotion meant that Marx's reputation rose far above that of rival leftist political economists.
Over the course of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, his Rothschild aided ideas came to be accepted as unchallengeable dogmas on the revolutionary political left.
THE FIRST WORLD WAR TRIGGERED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD HAD A SINISTER AGENDA..
WHEN THE CREDIBILITY OF EUROPE'S ROYAL HOUSES COLLAPSED IN THE WAKE OF THE DISASTROUS FIRST WORLD WAR, IT WAS MARX'S IDEAS AND DOCTRINES THAT LEFTIST REVOLUTIONARIES BULLDOZED TO IMPLEMENT— AIDED BY ROTHSCHILD MONOPOLIZED MEDIA .
THE WHOLE IDEA WAS FOR ROTHSCHILD TO TAKE OVER AS “BIG BROTHER” AND CARVE OUT THE STATE OF ISRAEL.
Marx's writings became the Bible of the revolutionaries who took power in Russia in 1917, and later in other countries.
Even today, after Marxism-inspired state communism has been thoroughly discredited by the dark experiences of history, innumerable leftist groups define themselves as "Marxists" and cling to the bearded economist's ideas with quasi-religious intensity.
Mad Marx's core idea was that the whole of human history could be explained as a materialist struggle between classes, playing out a zero-sum game over control of the means of production and the distribution of what is produced.
Again, By "capital," Marx meant the physical means of production, rather than money (financial capital), According to Marx, history evolves through the interaction between the mode of production and the relations of production.
When Marx talked about "value relationships" or "value proportions" (German: Wertverhältnisse), he did not mean "the money" or "the price". Instead, he meant the value proportions that exist between products of human labour. These relationships can be expressed by the relative replacement costs of products as labour hours worked.
The more labour it costs to make a product, the more it is worth and inversely the less labour it costs to make a product, the less it is worth. Money-prices are at best only an expression or reflection of Marx's value relationships—accurately or very inaccurately.
Das Kapital is full of obvious important internal inconsistencies, a basic reliance on tautological reasoning, numerous distinctions without practical difference, bald denials, selective - one hand clapping - analyses of causation, semantics games based on sly and nonfunctional definitions and redefinitions of terms, and a host of omitted essential factors.
Even Marx, although working feverishly on Das Kapital for about three decades, ultimately found it impossible to work logically with his own ideas. Nobody is told that after 30 years of writing Das Kapital, Marx died with his book totally incomplete, with Engels desperately tying up the loose ends..
Marx is like Moses ( who never existed ) searching for Israel by going round and round in circles..eating manna.
At the time of his death (1883), Marx had prepared the manuscript for Das Kapital, Volume IV, a critical history of theories of surplus value of his time, the 19th century.
Karl Marx, created a dense rationale for emphasizing the undoubted abuses and arguing that all the contributions of the capitalist ownership interest and capitalist financial systems are of no value and can thus be dispensed with.
Glaringly omitted from the Marx definition of economic value are all the factors that contribute to economic production of goods and services but that have no direct relation to labor on commodities as defined by Marx.
His narrow labor definition of value - limited to industrial labor use-values - is exclusive because other things of value in the market don't meet it. Things of value that don't involve industrial labor have no value because they don't involve industrial labor.
Since the labor theory of value is scientific truth, it cannot be undermined even by a multitude of obvious exceptions some of which he expressly recognizes as of economic benefit. Any value that doesn't conform to his definition of value must therefore be "imaginary."
Mad Marx is the Wizard of Oz exclaiming: "Pay no attention to those values behind the fuckin' curtain."
If Marx was the captain of a ship, his ship would never reach port..Marx commits the ultimate sin in economics - he is not practical. Any concept of value that cannot be accurately and readily calculated is useless for the fundamental purpose of allocating scarce resources.
Choot ka dhakkan Marx' abstract labor standard can only be applied to simple tasks dictated by the pace of industrial machines.
Marx - and the Marxists who followed him - would fail to explain how his abstract labor standard of value would apply to the vast mass of real labor that - because of talent, diligence and skill - rises above average levels.
Karl Marx appealed to one of the most base emotions: envy. As George Orwell observed about British socialists in the 1930s, “It’s not that the loved the poor. They hated the rich.”
Marxism is a historical fraud and failure. No intelligent person should give credence to ANYTHING about Marxism.
Marx kept his Das Kapital long and ponderous, to prevent people reading it. Rothschild’s media ensured that this shit book Das Kapital competed with Bible (cooked up by Jewess Helena in 325 AD ) to take the top place .
IN HIS AGE OF AI , MARXs ECONOMIC THEORIES ARE DEAD..
PEOPLE TRYING TO PUSH MARXISM IN INDIA HAVE A VESTED FOREIGN FUNDED AGENDA. THEY MUST BE PROFILED AND JAILED. WE KNOW THESE TRAITOR BASTARDS
Rationalization is not reason! Das Kapital is a massive exercise in rationalization almost entirely devoid of reason. It is useful only as a propaganda myth, at which it proved spectacularly successful
Marx, himself, would repeatedly be forced to have resort to market prices as an approximation. Where there are no market prices - as in socialist experiments based on administered prices - it would remain impossible to evaluate real labor in terms of the standard labor unit devised by Marx.
The political slogan "Workers of the world, unite!" is one of the most famous rallying cries from The Communist Manifesto (1848) by Karl Marx
BELOW: CHECK OUT THE MALLU PROLETARIAN COMMIE CUNTS, BRAINWASHED BY DAS KAPITAL..
THEY SING " FROM EVERY DROP OF OUR SPILLED BLOOD THOUSANDS WILL RISE".
AIYYOOOOOOOOOOOO
The propaganda purpose of Das Kapital becomes apparent even before it begins. Marx starts right off in his Preface to the second edition by invoking the science propaganda ploy - a common practice for him by this time. After all, who can doubt the word of "science? Even Jew Rothschild wont doubt TEE HEEE
Marx spends inordinate time explaining this difference between the subjective use values of items and their objective values in exchange.
In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, any product has a labor-value and a use-value, and if it is traded as a commodity in markets, it additionally has an exchange value, most often expressed as a money-price
Adam Smith recognized that commodities may have an exchange-value but may satisfy no use-value, such as diamonds, while a commodity with a very high use-value may have a very low exchange-value, such as water
In The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, Marx emphasizes that the use-value of a labour-product is practical and objectively determined, that is, it inheres in the intrinsic characteristics of a product that enable it to satisfy a human need or want.
The use-value of a product therefore exists as a material reality vis-a-vis social needs regardless of the individual need of any particular person. The use-value of a commodity is specifically a social use-value, meaning that it has a generally accepted use-value for others in society, and not just for the producer.
Exchange value refers to one of four major attributes of a commodity, i.e., an item or service produced for, and sold on the market. The other three aspects are use value, economic value, and price.
Thus, a commodity has:--
a value (note the link is to a non-Marxian definition of value);
a use value (or utility);
an exchange value, which is the proportion at which a commodity can be exchanged for other commodities;
a price (it could be an actual selling price or an imputed ideal price).
This process of "crisis" is explained by Marx in terms of his pseudo scientific gibberish - of "contradictions" and "thesis" and "antithesis" - by which he attempts to reduce the complex and inherently indefinite logic of economic analysis to a formulaic method with pretensions to scientific certitude.
The triad thesis, antithesis, synthesis is a progression of three ideas or propositions in which the first idea is followed by a second idea that negates the first, and the conflict between the first and second ideas is resolved by a third idea.
It is often used to explain the dialectical method of German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,but Hegel never used the terms himself, as instead his triad was concrete, abstract, absolute.
All this TRIAD bullshit is lifted from the amazing wisdom of Dvaita Vedanta, a mere template to be imposed on Advaita Vedanta .. No western philosopher has the brains to understand the basics of Sanatana Dharma
Dialectical progression in Vedanta propels your arguments by brain strorming..
The thesis is an intellectual proposition.
The antithesis is a critical perspective on the thesis.
The synthesis solves the conflict between the thesis and antithesis by reconciling their common truths, and forming a new proposition.
Das Capital has a theory of crisis , concerning the causes and consequences of the tendency for the rate of profit to fall in a capitalist system
"The antithesis between use-value and value; the contradictions that private labour is bound to manifest itself as direct social labour, that a particularized concrete kind of labour has to pass for abstract human labour; the contradiction between the personification of objects and the representation of persons by things; all these antitheses and contradictions, which are immanent in commodities, assert themselves, and develop their modes of motion, in the antithetical phases of the metamorphosis of a commodity” BAAAP REH !
Psychoanalysis is that mental illness for which it regards itself as therapy. We could say about Marx inspired socialism that it is that economic nightmare for which it regards itself as a solution.
Marx set out to answer a puzzle. Changing levels of supply and demand explain why the price of a commodity goes up or down, but does not explain why the equilibrium price of that commodity is what it is.
To solve the puzzle Marx relied on the “labour theory of value”. He helped prove that the price of a commodity was determined by how much labour time had gone into it—which showed how workers were exploited. However, he “arbitrarily ruled out the relative desirability or utility of commodities,” . which would strike most people as the obvious explanation."
MARX HAS THE CLOTH PRODUCING MILL OWNER VERSUS MILL WORKER MINDSET. CAN MAD MARX EVEN IMAGINE TRANSLATING THIS TO SOMETHING LIKE APPLE OR GOOGLE OR RELIANCE.
Communism is not fundamentally an ideology (like liberalism, conservatism, fascism or anarchism) but an economic system (like capitalism or serfdom/feudalism).
An excessive emphasis on ideology leads to insensitivity towards practical feedback.. The reason Communism doesn't work is because it attempts to repress norms which exist within all human societies..
People who start violent revolutions do it for their personal power, not for some far-fetched ideals.
Lenin or Stalin or Mao were not so much convinced communists, as they were convinced that communism would sell good to the masses and create a wave that they could ride to the very top (well, russian communists, after seizing power, adopted lifestyles even more lavish and abhorrent than the “bourgeoisie” they so fervently preached against).
If they believed that selling coconuts would get them personally there these bastards would become fierce and self righteous coconutoists .
Communism always was a failed ideology. It was Royalty under a new name
We saw the same with the French Revolution which eventually created EMPEROR Napoleon.
Rothschild used Jew Napoleon to grab the wealth of the stupid John Bulls.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/02/napoleon-unknown-side-capt-ajit.html
Humans inherently have an innate bond to their family and friends. A man does not mind sacrificing his wealth for his blood child. The first time man is happy in defeat, is when he loses to his own son..
To live in Marxism is to sacrifice this deeply seated human instinct, which would require many CENTURIES to brainwash out the human psyche. Reprogramming DNA takes time..
From 4000 BC to 1933 AD , no Nair of Kerala knew who his father was.. The father never cared for his son.. He cared for his sister’s sons
With the collective goal of society being equality of outcome, who is going to be motivated to achieve? You get nothing for it. No champion horse will give away his trophy to a donkey.
The smart, ambitious and competent people always flee these countries the most - unless they are killed as dissidents. Socialism is largely demotivating and even dysgenic.
The dynamic between supply and demand creates prices in a market economy. Prices gives information. It guides production. It tells companies and entrepreneurs what people like to pay for, where there is profit to be made.
When you take away this mechanism... good luck having a collective With socialist planned economies you always get over and underproduction side by side.
The lack of market competition in combination with the lack of rewards leads to very low level of innovation. And when you concentrate all power in society to one organisation ( state controlled by Nomenklatura ) you get massive corruption and power-abuse. And then we have the tragedy of the commons, as we have seen again and again , .
AGAIN, COMMUNSM WAS DESIGNED BY ROTHSCHILD— TO SWIPE THE NATIONS TREASURY WEALTH AND TO SIPHON OFF THE GOLD/ JEWELRY FROM ORDINARY PEOPLE..
Karl Marx read Thomas Malthus’ work on over population, and believed it.
Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is potentially exponential while the growth of the food supply is linear. It derives from the political and economic thought of the Thomas Robert Malthus, as laid out in his 1798 writings Malthusian theory is based around population growth and its sustainability , Marxian theory is based around systems of society
Marx designed a command-economy that was designed to discourage population growth. By ensuring there was never enough to support the current population he hoped to limit the rate of growth and manage it. Rothschild was successful in depopulating Russia and China..
The main feature of every Communist government in history has been a stagnant economy and a miserable standard of living for the vast majority of the citizens. They all eventually fail because it doesn’t work. The economy collapses.
Communism as an ideology is counter productive because the risk-reward or the effort-reward connections are completely broken. If and when everyone is entitled to everything regardless of the efforts and the amount of labor invested, the human nature is to minimize the efforts while maximizing the output.
That's why all efforts to establish a communism ended up in a totally corrupt society (maximizing output). The input was shrinking on its own without a proper reward. There was a perfect joke explaining this very nature: "They pretend they pay us. We pretend we do the job."
There was little if any reward for hard work or innovation and a lack of punishment for poor or inefficient work. The lack of incentives was a major reason for the poor performance of Eastern Europe economies. Why bother working hard if the reward was the same as doing the bare minimal?
During Commie Jyoti Basu’s rule of Bengal, we all know the shit state of the people and infrastructure. In Calcutta port there were hundreds of GHOST jobs where he alar was drawn but work was never done.
It was such a disgrace that western crew on ships used to holler and ridicule. At the lock gates in the west two people would do a job, while in Calcutta 20 people did the same job, often holding an umbrella in one hand to keep away the sun.
The labour unions with destructive attitudes and negative mindset ruled the roost. Nobody shipowner wanted Calcutta crew and they lost employment..
KHOON POSEENA DETHA HOI, POISA DENA ROTHA HOI !
Communism failed to provide incentives for workers and citizens to work hard and be productive. While there are many benefits from equality ( reduces jealousy ) , if pushed to an extreme it robs people of an incentive to make an effort.
This problem affected management too. Under Communism managers were not incentivized to be economically efficient, but to fulfil the plan. This meant there was a huge emphasis on quantity even if the quality was very poor. Managers often resorted to lying to meet unrealistic quotas.
CHINAs ECONOMY TODAY IS A BUBBLE WITHIN A BUBBLE.. CHINESE GDP FIGURES AND GROWTH ARE ALL INFLATED.
They suffered from perverse incentives that placed fulfilling political goals ahead of efficiency. Firms in general had little incentive to be efficient or control costs. They could easily access credit and further state funding to cover their costs.
Financial losses meant little to managers as there was no chance of the firm going bankrupt. No matter what the difficulties, the state would pay to bail the business out. The state guarantee of a job has meant everyone must be employed even if they add little to the factory.
Capitalist firms can profit from new inventions or suffer losses for being technologically backward. A communist firm gains no reward for innovation and suffers no loss for backwardness or even stagnation. In fact these animals in the zoo don’t even know what happens outside the zoo gates in the deep forest.
Capitalism is more flexible and allows new businesses to enter with new ideas, whereas communism is rigid and slow to adopt to change. Due to the repressive atmosphere of Communism, creativity was discouraged and treated with suspicion.
Ideas had to conform to the party line; dissent was neither wise nor rewarding. Even an attempt to improvise or innovate was treated with suspicion and even insubordination..
Commie rulers prized consistency.. they felt less threatened. I know..
There was no too much of tourism in Commie nations.. I was a sailor, I saw it..
The heavy levels of bureaucracy stifled attempts at innovation and the rigidity of the central plan made it exceptionally difficult for new innovations to be put into practice.
Communism greatest weakness was its failure to adapt. If you fail to adapt you stagnate.. Change is not risky, but being stagnant is.
Chairman Mao Zedong elaborates, “At no time and in no circumstances should a Communist place his personal interests first; he should subordinate to the interests of the nation and the masses. Hence selfishness and seeking the limelight are most contemptible, while ... working with all one’s energy, whole hearted devotion to public duty, and quiet hard work will command respect.”
The government becomes an exchange point for all elements of the society. It decides what everyone has to contribute and it decides what everyone can receive.
Ultimately, it replaces the members actual needs with a standard set of needs. The next step further, the government devices not only on the people's needs but on the people's desires and ultimately the people's thoughts.
Inevitably, communism goes hand in hand with thought and liberty restrictions and innovation crushing regulations. It never works on the long run. The total planned economy doesn't perform well growth wise.
Communal living of atheists without a conscience can only be supported by tyranny . It fails due to the lack of social, economic and political competition.
Imagine 10 guys working in a factory and one is just far superior to the nine others iin body mind and spirit -- it's human nature that that guy wants and deserves more. ..
Under a communist system where nobody owns anything, if the tractor breaks no one really has the incentive to fix it. Where under a capitalistic system someone who own that tractor would have a huge incentive to fix it.
Neither freedom nor prosperity, was/is seen in any communism nation. Mercy has never been its culture. Differences in standard of living, between capitalism and communism, was un-imaginable.
Communism, wanted to destroy capitalism, but having placed in wrong hands destroyed itself. It is good that mostly all countries have moved away from communist principles, for the better. It is good for the planet that this rabid commie dog has been put to sleep forever
Dictatorship and communism are almost opposite theories which can’t go together.- but in practice it is the reverse.. The most extreme Islamic nation is Saudi Arabia. Their Jewish ruler bloodline can have any amount of women in the harem.. they can drink alcohol , do anything.. But hey, the common people will face death.. This is what happens when you allow Jews to run the show.
Since building Communism was the goal, the Party had the main command role. And command they did, with that goal in mind. All manner of sacrifices were to be made for this goal. The goal was always tomorrow, and the sacrifices were always today. This is called cheating on the time axis
The best analogy here is having a box of tomatoes and only eating the ones that had a spot of rot, because if you don’t, they will rot completely in short order, while the perfect tomato can last till tomorrow. The next day, though, that perfect tomato is the one with a spot of rot, and you eat it, and leave another perfect tomato for tomorrow.
It’s a great plan, and a great way to spend your life eating only rotten tomatoes.
ON SHIPS THE STAGNANT CATEGORIES ( EXAMPLE ELECTRICAL OFFICERS/ PURSERS ) ARE THE WORST OFFICERS— ESPECIALLY IN SCI HERE THERE IS JOB SECURITY AND A MILITANT UNION ..
I KEPT THESE LAZY OFFICERS ( MOST FROM PNJAAABI FAMILIES WITH ZERO CLASS ) ON A TIGHT LEASH, SHORTENING THE LEASH IF THEY GAVE ME HALF AN OPPORTUNITY.
THEY KNEW THAT ONCE THE LEASH IS SO SHORT THAT I HAVE THEM ON THEIR TOES WITH A HOOK THROUGH THE NOSTRILS, THE NEXT STEP IS TO BE “KICKED OUT OF THE SHIP” AT THE NEXT PORT..
WHEN I MADE SERVICE REPORTS ( APPRAISAL FORMS ) I NEVER JUDGED A OFFICER ON HIS CURRENT PERFORMANCE—I JUDGED HIS FUTURE POTENTIAL.
In Marxist thought, communist society or the communist system is the type of society and economic system postulated to emerge from technological advances in the productive forces, representing the ultimate goal of the political ideology of communism.
A communist society is characterized by common ownership of the means of production with free access to the articles of consumption and is classless and stateless, implying the end of the exploitation of labour..
But Marx did not understand the meaning of logistics. Wars are lost because of poor logistics..
Communism is a specific stage of socioeconomic development predicated upon a superabundance of material wealth, which is postulated to arise from advances in production technology and corresponding changes in the social relations of production. This would allow for distribution based on need and social relations based on freely-associated individuals.
COMMUNISM WAS JUST AN IDEA – ANY IDEA IS AS GOOD AS ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
COMMUNISM ONLY WORKS WHEN EVERYBODY IS EQUAL MINDED AND WHEN THERE IS NO NEED TO PROGRESS IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM— LIKE SOME MAROONED PEOPLE TRAPPED ON AN ISLAND AWAITING RESCUE..
The simple reason why communism fails is that assumes everything is plentiful, everybody is perfectly equal and everybody is thinking the same way ( like surviving till rescue ).
While in reality it’s incredibly inefficient as the non productive members of society would require to be treated as equal to the productive members..
The fundamental flaw in Marx-Engels-Lenin communism was its use of extreme violence and force
Socialism always works until you run out of other people’s money..
Communism and socialism are doctrines. It's TRUE that Marx posited Marxism as a science or philosophy; but it was really a hack job.
Communism is incompatible with human nature and self esteem. To fall in love with yourself and being proud of what you see when you look into the mirror is the first step to happiness..
When you discover what you are worth, you will find it impossible to thrive amongst useless people..
The hardest part of any extreme journey is believing that you are worth the voyage.
You can change whatever you want but if the core principle of your ideology is just completely wrong it will always fail. That is why all “communism” turns into chaos and then into totalitarian dictatorships basically overnight.
PSSSST - ALL COMMIE DICTATORS WERE CRYPTO JEWS OR POODLES OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.
Communism is simply a mad idea and will always fail no matter what.
Capitalism is alive and well in China, Vietnam and Cuba. Revenues from private enterprise are what keep those supposedly communist governments afloat.
Communism proclaims that all individuals are equal. This is a great idea. However, many people believe that they are superior to others and they need someone to force them to be equal. When this happens, it isn’t true communism anymore as the person forcing everyone to be equal is now more powerful than everyone else.
It is Jew Rothschild’s idea to keep Deepa Malik , her wheelchair and her motor mouth, at par with Usain bolt
BELOW: I PITY THIS WOMANs HUSBAND..
SHE WON A MEDAL IN A FIELD SHORN OFF ALL REAL / FAIR COMPETITION..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/08/usain-bolt-grabs-gold-at-rio-100-metres.html
In communism, everything is shared. This seems like a brilliant idea until you realise that a person who slacks off and is a lazy pig ( or pretending to be hurt/ sick ) in general gets the same things as a person who works their socks off and is very productive.
While party loyalists and the well connected nomenklatura ( all Jewish ) suffered no privation, they still preached that everyone else must sacrifice themselves for the “good of the party”. Corruption was rampant while none on top had even considered what they were doing was wrong in any way.
There will always be someone that will want to work the system and funnel as much as they want and more into their own pockets at the expense of their neighbors.
I headed teams for 35 years.. I know teamwork.. I know what to do with people who use “teamwork” for their greedy and unwarranted advantage..
Anytime there is little incentive to work, failure is around the corner. Socialism drains incentive out of the process. The incentive is at the top of the ladder
Communism flies in the face of human nature (like all utopian ideas). People simply do not strive as hard for the “good of society” as they do to advance their own condition and the condition of their families.
If you if you want Total Security go to prison. There you are fed, clothed, and given Medical Care. The only thing lacking is freedom. Prison is a kin to Communism. You're given all the basics. But your standard of living will be universally low.
A totalitarian Society will not long sustain itself, as freedom is a basic yearning of the human spirit.
Communism puts too much power in the centralized government. If private property is abolished, then that means the government is a dictator. The idea was that the few will control how the lives of many will be lived.: communism was based on the assumption that the bourgeosie or upper class are abusive and should be overthrown.
But under the communist system, you actually have the same thing, a group of few violent and mean Jews who want to control the many.? It’s basically trying to solve a problem with the same thinking that created it.
Being forced to possess all the things everyone else has infringes on your personal liberty and reduces the uniqueness that every person has.
Running your country by terror is a bad idea.Communism requires a totalitarian government to maintain it.. The idea of communism was built out of sudden irrationality and people who don’t understand economics..
The Mathematical manuscripts of Karl Marx consist mostly of Karl Marx's attempts to understand the foundations of infinitesimal calculus Marx knew nothing of Math.. Whatever Math you see in Das Kapital has been inserted by agents of Jew Rothschild who knew advanced Math..
Creating a completely equal society involves forcibly taking rewards that people have worked hard for, and distributing it to people who haven’t done anything to deserve it.. more so out of laziness.
Risk is central to economic activity, but Marx pretty much ignores it. He wrote contemptuously about investment being merely "pushing tokens around".
Capital accumulation is the dynamic that motivates the pursuit of profit, involving the investment of money or any financial asset with the goal of increasing the initial monetary value of said asset as a financial return whether in the form of profit, rent, interest, royalties or capital gains.
The aim of capital accumulation is to create new fixed and working capitals, broaden and modernize the existing ones, grow the material basis of social-cultural activities, as well as constituting the necessary resource for reserve and insurance.
The process of capital accumulation forms the basis of capitalism, and is one of the defining characteristics of a capitalist economic system.
Adam Smith’s famous quote about self-interest: ”It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.”
Adherents to Marxism are often so enamored by it that they treat it like infallible divine truths.
You should see the stupid faces of Mallu and Bong commies.. The foreign funded violence they perpetrate to have a successful Commie bandh ( prevent people from working) has to be seen to be believed.
The illegal collegium Judiciary and benami Media are in cahoots..
Marxism is the only way to heaven (on earth) and anyone or anything that isn’t for it is against it, and if you are against it, you are evil and your rights, freedoms, and opinions are negated. You lose the right to be free or even to live.
Mad Marx argues that commodities have both a use-value and an exchange-value, and that their exchange-value is rooted in how much labor-power went into them. While traditionally people bought commodities in order to use them, capitalists use commodities differently. Their final goal is increased profit.
Therefore, they put out money and buy commodities, in order to sell those commodities for a profit. The cycle then repeats itself. The reason why the capitalists are able to make a profit is that they only need to pay workers their value (how much it takes to keep them functional), but the workers produce more than that amount in a day. Thus, the workers are exploited.
The capitalists are able to do this because they have more power, and control the means of production. Furthermore, the workers' character is negatively affected by the system. They don't own the products of their labor, and the repetitive work they have to do makes them little more than machines.
WHAT MINDLESS BULLSHIT IS ALL THIS?
Communism struggles to find the right balance between supply and demand because it has no motivation to do so. The government only needs to produce items based on what it believes the population needs to continue working. And no nation will import inferior goods from a Commie nation..
Supply and demand tend to focus on the export market only. This process allows the government to bring in currency that it can use on the global stage to reinforce its own importance domestically. That places further pressure on the general population to listen to production mandates since the consequences for disobedience can be quite high.
Because ownership in a communist government lies with the state instead of in private hands, there is a higher risk of abuse for monetary purposes, power and control, or to pursue a personal agenda.
The people at the highest levels of government are the ones who control the resources, which means they can decide in an instant if someone is “worthy” or not of receiving something. Each household is always at the mercy of the government and its potentially ever-changing views on what they deem to be acceptable behavior.
The goal of the communist party once it comes into power is to hold onto that leverage by any means necessary. Since the government controls every aspect of society, they can send out propaganda through all media channels with enough truth to make the stories believable.
A single commie Jew official might be in control of setting an agenda, measuring the performance of a society, or cracking down on actions that are deemed to be political dissent.
The illegal collegium Judiciary and benami Media are in cahoots..
Marxism is the only way to heaven (on earth) and anyone or anything that isn’t for it is against it, and if you are against it, you are evil and your rights, freedoms, and opinions are negated. You lose the right to be free or even to live.
The most notorious example of forced collectivization is the land reform carried out by Soviets between 1928 and 1933. It was thought that collectivization would maximize the use and potential of the countryside for urban and industrial needs. Russian industry was just taking off, and enormous quantities of food would be required for the workers.
Masses of resisting landowners—many of them small-scale farmers who worked their own land—died at the hands of executioners. The state’s requisition of crops, livestock, and farmland was paid for by the farmers and by the lower class in general, some ten million of whom starved to death in five years.
Exactly the same atrocity took place in Communist China, between 1958 and 1961. During this time, private farming was outlawed as it had been in Stalin’s Russia, and about 36 million people starved to death in possibly the single most destructive famine in human history.
COMMUNISM AND SOCIALISM ARE UMBRELLA TERMS REFERRING TO TWO LEFT-WING SCHOOLS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT; BOTH OPPOSE CAPITALISM
As a system of government, communism tends to center on a one-party state that bans most forms of political dissent. Communist Party officials ( Nomenklatura Jews ) assumes control over all of the country's social and economic activities.
Socialism predates the Communist Manifesto by a few decades. Early versions of socialist thought were articulated by Henri de Saint-Simon (1760-1825), who was himself an admirer of Adam Smith, but whose followers developed utopian socialism; Robert Owen (1771–1858); Charles Fourier (1772–1837); Pierre Leroux (1797–1871); and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809–1865), who is famous for declaring that "property is theft."
Marxism emerged in this milieu. Engels called it "scientific socialism"..
“Stalin is a Genghis Khan, an unscrupulous intriguer, who sacrifices everything else to the preservation of power... He changes his theories according to whom he needs to get rid of next”-—Nikolai Bukharin, 1928.
As General Secretary, Stalin ensured that he was one of the only people allowed to see Lenin after his stroke, and he used that position to ensure that he became the new leader of the country.
Bolshevik leaders ( all Jews ) appointed themselves to many high offices and started implementing communist practices based on Marx’s ideology. . Lenin established the Cheka, a secret police force to defend the success of the Russian Revolution and censor and control anti-Bolshevik newspapers and activists
Stalin isolated his major opponents in the Communist Party, eventually throwing them out, and became the unchallenged leader of the Soviet Union. He officially ruled the country from 1924-1953. People deemed to be political enemies began being imprisoned in labor camps or deported to remote areas of Russia.
In 1934, actions against political enemies, including members of the Communist Party who disagreed with Stalin’s policies, intensified with the start of the Great Purge. About 2.1 million people were executed from 1934 to 1940 under Stalin’s orders.
After winning out against Trotsky, Stalin became one of the most brutal dictators in world history. He was a hammer, and he treated his entire country like a nail in his relentless quest for personal power. He went after his rivals, then his own comrades, then everyone else he didn't like.
Jew Mao ordered a vast industrialization program that was supposed to transform China's agrarian economy into a much more advanced one. This project, called the "Great Leap Forward", hoped to create an industrial society that focused on manpower more than machines; hence the "backyard steel furnaces" phenomenon.
As a result of the incompetent attempt to shift peasants from farming to steelworking, China's economy crashed and around 51 million people starved to death. After being sidelined as a result of this failure, Mao eventually launched yet another attempt at a rapid societal transformation in a bid to reestablish himself as the undisputed leader of China.
Starting in 1966, his so-called "Great Cultural Revolution" again toppled China into chaos, as a fanatic youth movement set out to destroy Chinese traditional culture and the supposed last vestiges of the old elites.
In practice, it was a reign of terror that consisted of completely random attacks against anyone and anything that drew the suspicion of the frenzied "Red Guards," among them no small number of their own operatives.
Mao's eventual successor, Deng Xiaoping, effectively abandoned it by promoting pragmatic developmental policies, so that today's China is a booming capitalist economy ruled by a totalitarian oligarchy.
The Chinese economy now represents the worst excesses of capitalism combined with the structural brokenness of the old communist system. China now relies heavily on aggressive jingoistic nationalism to motivate its people
With the passage of labor laws, the strike has become the workers'"inherent right" and "collective bargaining" has come to be regarded as an effective means to achieve labor's purposes. Trade unions are a powerful institution in today's society and are so regarded by capitalists and politicians. When workers have assurance of their livelihood and security, they will not be interested in class struggle.
The dark century of Das Kapital is finally over. . The universal awakening of human reason has opened a new era of thought centered on nationalism, democracy, and the people's livelihood
Gary Kasparov said: “It is no coincidence that the values of the American century are also the values of innovation and exploration, individual freedom, risk-taking, investment, opportunity, ambition, and sacrifice. Religious and secular dictatorships cannot compete with these values, and so they attack the systems founded upon them.”
Innovation is best fostered by systems that reward risk-takers, hard work, and implementation. Free markets (invisible hand stuff) do a great job in these respects; command economies do not.
Communism was an exciting idea when it was first proposed; a time when most of the world was still run by kings and queens, and ordinary people had very little hope of escaping poverty.
But when some countries tried to make it work for real it turned out to be even worse, because instead of getting rid of their rulers and living as equals, people became enslaved by a new set of rulers instead. They were told that as the system began to work those rulers would give up their power, but neither of those things ever happened.
The carrot on stick hung out by Karl Marx in his 1848 book, “The Communist Manifesto,” pure communism results in a society in which all people are equal and there is no need for money or the accumulation of individual wealth. There is no private ownership of economic resources, with a central government controlling all facets of production. Economic output is distributed according to the needs of the people. Social friction between white and blue-collar workers and between rural and urban cultures will be eliminated, freeing each person to achieve his or her highest human potential. CHOO CHWEEET APPAH !
Communism sees the transition from Capitalism as being a violent bloody revolution where the existing system is effectively destroyed as the workers rise up against the middle and upper classes.
It is completely irrational to propose to smash and destroy a state entirely, then to build up one, and then again see its “withering away” while even the bourgeois state exists “without the bourgeoisie”.
Communism and socialism are not the same thing, even though the two words are often used interchangeably.
Socialism and communism both adhere to the principle that the resources of the economy should be collectively owned by the public and controlled by a central organization.
They differ, however, in the management and control of the economy. In socialism, the people themselves decide through communes or popularly elected councils on how the economy should work. This makes socialism a liberal system because majority of the people have a say on how the economy should be run.
Communism, on the other hand, controls its economy through a single authoritarian party. It is thus characterized as conservative because the economy functions based on the decisions of a few commie Jew Nomenklatura
Socialism is an economic system while communism is both an economic and political system.
You can see that, in a sense, communism is an extreme version of socialism. Marxists (students of Karl Marx) often describe socialism as the “first phase” of communism.
The term socialism was created by Rothschild’s agent Jew Henri de Saint-Simon , one of the founders of what would later be labeled utopian socialism.
He created a political and economic ideology known as Saint-Simonianism that claimed that the needs of an industrial class, which he also referred to as the working class, needed to be recognized and fulfilled to have an effective society and an efficient economy..
Saint-Simon's ideas, expressed largely through a succession of Rothschild owned journals such as l'Industrie (1816), La politique (1818) and L'Organisateur (1819–20) focused on the perception that growth in industrialization and scientific discovery would have profound changes on society..
Karl Marx identified Saint-Simon as being among whom he called the "utopian socialists"
Like I said before, important socialist thinker in France was Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who proposed his philosophy of mutualism in which "everyone had an equal claim, either alone or as part of a small cooperative, to possess and use land and other resources as needed to make a living".
The Fabian Society is a British socialist organisation founded by Rothschild which was established with the purpose of advancing the principles of socialism via gradualist and reformist means. The Fabian Society was organized January 4, 1884. Marxism was a major influence on the Fabians.
Communism dictates almost every goal or need of the individual. The government controls the law at all times. They can instantly decide if actions or conduct of individuals should become illegal, then apply those changes retroactively if they so choose.
Communism makes no distinction between propaganda and education
Indoctrination, education, and propaganda work together to change the perspectives of the general population.
Everything from textbooks to newspaper articles is carefully directed, managed, and monitored to produce results. They might offer reading and writing essentials to the general population, but in return, they ask for compliance in every aspect of life.
Dissent is not permitted under Communist rule
The commie government pursued a combination of censorship, imprisonment, suppression, and “labor re-education” to stop the activities of activists or dissidents.
Dissidents in the Soviet Union faced an even worse fate, including forced admittance to mental hospitals, entry to a labor camp, or general exile. Because dissent was considered a criminal act, it could result in lengthy prison sentences too.
There is no way to change the behaviors of the ruling group ( nomenklatura ) from within..
When Communism encounters a voice which doesn’t support it, the first effort involves immediate suppression through repression. People disappear frequently, even today
BELOW: SECOND STANDARD FAIL, MM MANI, THE ELECTRICITY MINISTER OF KERALA , WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE KERALA FLOODS 2 YEARS AGO, BOASTING HOW COMMIES KILLED THEIR OPPONENTS..
We made a list of 13 people...1, 2, 3, 4. First, we killed three among that; one was shot dead, one stabbed, and one beaten to death," Mani had said in his speech.
Forced disappearances occur when the state secretly imprisons or abducts someone, then refuses to acknowledge their whereabouts or fate. Often mafia goons in police uniforms take away people at midnight.. Under Communist rule, forced disappearance implies either murder or long-term forced labor with plausible deniability.
In Commie rule , you’re not permitted hobbies because that is labor which does not benefit society. Only if you praise the commie govt will you be allowed to write poetry or paint or sing
In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and co-author Friedrich Engels outlined the following 10 points:---
Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes
A heavy progressive or graduated income tax
Abolition of all right of inheritance
Confiscation of the property of all immigrants and rebels
Equal liability of all to labor and establishment of industrial armies (especially for agriculture)
The gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country.
Free education for all children in public schools and abolition of children's factory labor
Centralization of credit in the hands of the state
The state would control communication and transportation
The state factories and instruments of production would cultivate wastelands and improve the soil
The manifesto mentions state ownership in its last three points, which makes even this pure vision of communism sound like socialism..
The laws of supply and demand don't set prices—the government does. Planners lose the valuable feedback these prices provide about what the people want. They can't get up-to-date information about consumers' needs, and as a result, there is often a surplus of one thing and shortages of others.
To compensate, citizens create a black market to trade the things the planners don't provide, which destroys the trust in Marx's pure communism. Black marketers risk death.. People no longer feel the government can give "to each according to his needs."
In 1922, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was established with six communist countries: Russia, Belorussia, Ukraine, and the Transcaucasian Federation. In 1936, the Federation became Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia. By 1992, when it dissolved, the USSR contained 15 countries. The remaining nine were Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.
In a Communist structure, there is one overall entity which controls the message and agenda of the society.. If you don’t agree with the direction of society, you could be imprisoned or worse killed .
There is rarely any contact with the outside world that has not been screened by the government first. That means the population can think they are informed on current events, but in reality, they are purposely kept in ignorance , like mushrooms in the dark.
There is no precedent for inheritance under Communism because everything belongs to the singular party, state, or government
FEAR IS THE KEY
One day King Akbar said to Birbal, "Birbal, my people are very obedient to me. They love me very much." Birbal smiled and replied, "This is true, but they fear you too, Jahaanpanaah." Akbar could not agree on this, so it was decided that Birbal's statement should be tested.
Next day, according to Birbal's instructions, the King announced that he would be going for hunting, and people should pour a pot of milk in a tub kept in the courtyard. Next day when Akbar returned from hunting, he found that there was no milk in the tub, instead there was only water. Akbar got very disappointed, but couldn't do anything.
Then Birbal said, "This time you will announce that you will come back and see the tub yourself." King did as Birbal said. Once again the tub was kept in the courtyard. This time when King returned from the hunting, he found the tub overflowing with milk. Birbal said, "I told you. It is your fear which made people obey you. The first time there was no one to check the tub, so people poured the water, but the second time, they knew that you would check yourself, that is why they brought the milk."
The disadvantages of the Commie system mainly originate from the elimination of free trade rights. This means that supply and demand do not dictate the prices and only the government can. Due to this, the planners do not benefit from feedback concerning the costs as well as information that tells them what people want.
Communism is not a good environment for businesses to flourish. Unlike in a capitalist society, where there is virtually no limit as to what businesses will earn, a communist form of government would put a hard cap on a business’s ability to grow.
There is little room to have personal ambitions in a communist country, since everyone is the same and no one is expected to do something out of the ordinary. Personal growth or development does not thrive in a communist regime.
AT SEA I INTRODUCED SEVERAL INNOVATIONS AND CAUSED DANGEROUS LAWS TO BE CHANGED FOR THE BETTER, DEFYING MY COMPANY AND GLOBAL REGULATORY BODY IMO.. .
I RISKED BEING SACKED BY MY COMPANY OR EVEN DECLARED PERSONA NON GRATA AT THE SEA BY IMO.
IF THE SYSTEM WAS COMMUNIST I WOULD HAVE DIED IN THE GULAG — FROZEN TO DEATH..
I CAN QUOTE HUNDREDS OF EXAMPLES.. HERE ARE THREE ..
The temptress of socialism is constantly luring us with the offer: “give up a little of your freedom and I will give you a little more security.” This is like inviting a lion of the deep jungle to sat in a Zoo . As the experience of this century has demonstrated, the bargain is tempting but never pays off. We end up losing both our freedom and our security.
The redistribution of wealth is a cycle of contempt—a cycle that fosters corruption and breeds hatred, jealousy, and resentment. It’s dehumanizing and it weakens the human soul. This is the gateway to mass evil...
Marx states in the Manifesto of the Communist Party:--
You must, therefore, confess that by "individual" you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible. (Published by Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1973 edition, page 66)
Followers of Karl Marx, like Stalin and Mao Tse-tung, have taken this affirmation literally and have proceeded to kill the "middle-class owners of property" once they have acquired power.
Jew Marx proudly affirmed that he was a materialist. Jew Mao Tse-tung summarizes the materialism of Marx with the statement: "There is nothing in the world apart from matter in motion." (On Contradiction, International Publishers Edition, 1953, page 20)
Marxism does not deny the existence of thought and spirit. It affirms that these are derivatives of matter; that the brain secretes thought as the liver secretes bile.
So so so, Since thought and emotions are the product of material elements, they can be controlled by controlling the material elements which produce them. Thus the materialism of Marx provides the basis for the control of ideas and attitudes and ultimately of human nature itself.
Marxism teaches that the economic environment creates the ideas, attitudes and impulses that constitute human nature. It pays attention to the environment of infancy and childhood since the brain is undergoing more rapid development during this period.
The experiences of life, provided by the economic environment, are stored up within the structure of the brain and ultimately reveal themselves in the thoughts and emotions of the mature individual.
Those people who shared the same experiences in the process of production generated the same brain structure. Consequently, they thought and felt alike. They formed a class. BRAAAYYYY
In his analysis of the capitalist mode of production, Marx allegedly discovered two economic environments. One was that shared by those who owned the means of production. They formed a class which he named the bourgeoisie.
The other environment was that of wage labor. The laborers formed the class known as the proletariat. Marx affirmed that a state of universal conflict existed between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He named this conflict the class struggle or the class war.
Marx saw the class struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie as the dynamic of modern history. He contended that he had discovered a scientific law which assured that the proletariat would be victorious in this struggle; that it would overthrow the bourgeoisie by a VIOLENT AND BLOODY revolutionary process and establish its hegemony in every country and ultimately over the entire world
Jew Frederick Engels, the side kick of Mad Marx , was so convinced of the inevitability of this that Engels undertook the study of military science so that he could serve as commander-in-chief of the world proletarian armies.
The Communist Manifesto ends with the grim warning: "Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win." (Page 96)
Marx believed that a scientific program based upon these laws could create a new and superb quality of human nature. This new man would possess such diverse talents that he would be able to perform a vast variety of functions.
Marx stated: "In communist society, where no one has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticize after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, shepherd, or critic." (Collected Works, Vol. V, page 275)
Despite his capacity for self-delusion, Karl Marx did not believe that the desired condition known as Communism could emerge suddenly from existing capitalism.
As the beautiful butterfly must pass through the stage of the caterpillar before it can fly in all its glory, Communism must pass through the stage of Socialism before the era of abundance and freedom can dawn.
Steel can only be created by passing iron and coal through a fiery furnace, and Communism can only be created by passing society through the fires of violent revolution and brute dictatorship.
Communism is the hypothetical end result which will reward the survivors of the long march that is necessary to move from Capitalism to Communism.
Steps on this long march include: 1) Revolution, 2) Dictatorship of the Proletariat, 3) Destruction of the Capitalist State, 4) Liquidation of the Bourgeoisie, 5) Creation of Socialism, 6) Creation of the New Socialist Man, 7) Withering Away of the State, and 8) Emergence of Communism. CHOO CHWEEET APPAH !
The purpose of the revolution is to overthrow the existing government and to replace it by the dictatorship of the Proletariat, which is actually the dictatorship of the Communist Party over the proletariat. The Communist Party monopolizes all the levers of power.
Lenin defined the dictatorship of the proletariat as follows: "The dictatorship of the proletariat is the rule-unrestricted by law and based on force-of the proletariat over the bourgeoisie, a rule enjoying the sympathy and support of the laboring and exploited masses." (The State and the Revolution by Lenin as quoted in Problems of Leninism by J. Stalin, page 49)
Jew Lenin was as concerned with the maintenance of power as with its seizure.. Above all, the army must be destroyed and replaced by a new army, a "Red Army.", led by Jew Generals
When the revolution is successful, the majority of the bourgeois class remains. In the words of Karl Marx, they must be "swept out of the way and made impossible." If this is not done, they will form the environment in which a substantial segment of the population is nurtured and will thus destroy the prospect of a perfect society.
The liquidation of the bourgeoisie by violence is an essential step of the path to Communism. This is why Communism must kill.
In the Communist Program for human regeneration, killing is as necessary as the fire of the furnace is for the creation of steel
This program of slaughter is rational if the basic premises of Marxism are accepted. If there is no God who teaches, "Thou shalt not kill," and if people are merely animals, why should they not be treated as animals? Husbandmen who breed finer animals and destroy the inferior ones in the process are respected and honored throughout the world.
The Communists believe that they are the husbandmen who have been selected by history to enact the programs that will result in the creation of perfect human animals. To hesitate to eliminate the diseased would be to betray their glorious mission.
THE DEPLORABLE CONDUCT OF THE COMMUNISTS IS NOT DUE TO THEIR DEPARTING FROM THE TEACHINGS OF MARX, BUT TO THEIR OBEDIENCE TO THEM. THIS IS WHY THE SHOE OF JEW MARX MUST BE DIPPED IN HIS OWN KOSHER SHIT AND MUST BE APPLIED VIOLENTLY ACROSS HIS FACE
"The proof of the pudding is in the eating." The ingredients of the communist pudding are lethal. The massive and widespread homicide that characterizes Communist conduct is the fulfillment of Marxism.
The Marxist doctrines of ATHEISM, MATERIALISM, ECONOMIC DETERMINISM, CLASS, CLASS LIQUIDATION, CLASS DICTATORSHIP and INEVITABLE PROGRESS are false and deadly.
Marx developed a theory of historical materialism. He describes the mid-19th-century condition in The Communist Manifesto as follows:--
The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society. Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form, was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence for all earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty, and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all which is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real condition of life and his relations with his kind.
Furthermore, Marx described the process of social progress, which in his opinion is based on the interaction between the productive forces and the relations of production:
No social order is ever destroyed before all the productive forces for which it is sufficient have been developed, and new superior relations of production never replace older ones before the material conditions for their existence have matured within the framework of the old society.
Capitalism is thought by Marx as a process of continual change, in which the growth of markets dissolve all fixities in human life, and Marx admits that capitalism is progressive and non-reactionary.
Marxism further states that capitalism, in its quest for higher profits and new markets, will inevitably sow the seeds of its own destruction. Marxists believe that, in the future, capitalism will be replaced by socialism and eventually communism.
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” spAke Marx.
“Reason has always existed, but not always in a reasonable form.” ― Karl Marx
TOBA TOAHBAAAHH
Instead of Mickey Mouse, commie children were raised on stories about politically active children—little commie heroes.
A major role model for Soviet kids was Pavlik Morozov, a martyr of the 1930s. At the tender age of thirteen, he turned his father in to authorities for not sharing Pavlik’s belief in communism and not supporting Joseph Stalin’s strategy of collective farming.
Though most likely a product of a propagandist’s imagination, the story goes that Pavlik’s father was sent to a labor camp and later executed, while Pavlik was murdered by his own family.
As part of school curriculum, Commies discussed the young martyr, praising his bravery and loyalty to communism, absorbing his story through poems and schoolbooks.
Among colleges and universities, the University of California, Berkeley has — since the 1960s — held the title as the most radically liberal. Hailed by leftists as “the birthplace of Free Speech,” the university and the town from which it draws its name have long been a seedbed of communist ideology ( sustained by Jewish professors ) .
With that communist ideology having now come of age, Berkeley is becoming the deathbed of Free Speech.
Berkeley UC has an endowed faculty chair in Israel Studies for Jewish Law and Israel Studies. JNU Social sciences dept gets its rabid commie ideology from Jewish Commie professors of Berkeley UC ..
Berkeley UC and Antifa ( Jewish Commie unit ) vehemently support Jewess Greta Thunberg..
In the current “Free Speech” battle, as in other times and places, the communists say one thing and mean another. Touting “Free Speech” to get their message heard, they immediately shout “hate speech” and “fascism” to silence their ideological opponents as soon as they have enough influence to do so. When shouting isn’t enough, they use violence or the threat of violence.
WHITE JEWISH PROFESSORS WHO TEACH SOCIAL SCIENCES IN COLUMBIA AND BERKELEY UC ARE RABIDLY ANTI-HINDU AND ANTI-INDIA
THEIR MAIN AIM IS TO DIVIDE HINDUS AND CREATE CHAOS IN INDIA..
For a campus that claims to value diversity in thought, the attack on free speech is more than hypocritical; it is telling. One thing that can be said of communists is that they are consistent in their tactics.
ANY INDIAN STUDENT WHO HAS STUDIED SOCIAL SCIENCES AND JOURLAMISM IN COLUMBIA AND BERKELEY UC MUST BE PROFILED.. EXAMPLE: BARKHA DUTT STUDIED JOURNALISM IN COLUMBIA ..
A LOT OF THESE COMMIE STUDENTS ARE CHILDREN OF BABUS WHO HAVE SOLD NATIONs SECRETS TO THE JEWISH DEEP STATE..
TAMIL BRAHMIN RAGHURAM RAJANs FATHER R GOVINDARAJAN ( WORKED FOR RAW ) DAMAGED HIS SONs PROESPECTS IN INDIA..
RAJIV GANDHI KICKED RAW AGENT R GOVINDARAJAN ON HIS TEETH, KAAN PAKADKE NIKAAL DIYA FOR ANTI NATIONAL ACTIVITIES.
HE WAS SUPERCEEDED AND SIDELINED.. RAGURAN RAJAN WAS MENTORED IN ECONOMICS BY JEW STEWART MYERS
Subramanian Swamy on May 12 in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi demanded sacking of RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan. "The RBI governor is wilfully and deliberately wrecking the Indian economy. He is mentally not fully Indian." “In my opinion, the RBI Governor is not appropriate for the country. I don’t want to speak much about him. He has hiked interest rates in the garb of controlling inflation that has damaged the country. His actions have led to collapse of industry and rise of unemployment in the economy. The sooner he is sent back to Chicago, the better it would be.”
ROTHSCHILD CONTROLS THE INFLATION RATE ON THIS PLANET.. WE ALL KNOW THE INFLATION RATES OF ZIMBABWE AND VENEZUELA.. IF THE RULER ALLOWS JEWS TO STEAM, THE INFLATION RATE WILL COME DOWN WITHIN AN HOUR.
VADAKAYIL SUPPORTS SWAMY.. FOR MANY INDIANS THIS IS ENOUGH..
GITA GOPINATH HAS BECOME IMF CHIEF NOT BECAUSE OF HER BRILLIANCE, BUT JUST BECAUSE SHE IS THE BLOOD RELATIVE OF ROTHSCHILDs AGENT COMMIE AK GOPALAN
SHE WILL SELL INDIA FOR HALF A PIECE OF FOREIGN KOSHER SILVER..
WE IN INDIA HAVE STOPPED CARING FOR ROTHSCHILDs ECONOMICS..
GITA BABY HAS BEEN PERSONALLY HANDPICKED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD, TO SHOWCASE INDIA AS A BEGGAR NATION....
ALL WAR EXPENSES OF USA ARE ADDING TO ITS GDP.. HURRICANE DAMAGE INCREASES AMERICAN GDP... DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER INCASED US GDP. DRUG ADDICTS AND THEIR REHABILITATION INCREASES THE GDP OF USA..THE MEXICO WALL COST IS ADDING TO USAs GDP.. GDP DOES NOT FACTOR IN THE 23.3 TRILLION UD DEBT OF USA.
WAAH RAAJA WAAH !
Peaceful societies, like India, characterized by a lower level of crime (and consequently legal activities, prisons, etc.) are penalized in terms of GDP! .. The same is true for countries with a healthy way of life!
By the way drugs to cure fast food effects on health and low mobility induced excessive weight of Hilly Billy Yanks and John Bulls are a multi-billion industry...
Gita Gopinath wants India to project “ REAL GDP” with GDP DEFLATOR. ..
The GDP deflator, also called implicit price deflator, is a measure of inflation. ..
We all know how Jew Rothschild calculates inflation.. which is in reality essentially a hidden tax on the public..
BEFORE SHE SAT ON THE TOP IMF CHAIR, GITA GOPINATH , WAS ECONOMIC ADVISER TO ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN...
German-speaking Jews who arrived in the United States in the mid-19th century spread across the U.S. and tended to be merchants and shopkeepers. Yiddish-speaking Jews from Eastern Europe who arrived in the U.S. beginning in the 1880s settled in the big cities and tended to be workers.
Their children were entitled to a free public education and once they became citizens, they could vote and participate in the political process.
It did not take long before they began to see commie trade unions as the path their economic and social progress.
JEW Samuel Gompers was a Jewish immigrant labor union leader and a key figure in American labor history. Gompers founded the American Federation of Labor (AFL), and served as the organization's president from 1886 to 1894, and from 1895 until his death in 1924.
Samuel baby was a high ranking FREE MASON
He also encouraged the AFL to take political action to "elect their friends (JEWS) " and "defeat their enemies (CHRISTIANS)"
By 1888, there was already a Jewish labor organization called the United Hebrew Trades, originally conceived by Russian-speaking Jewish intellectuals and revolutionaries
JEW Abraham Cahan, later the editor of the Yiddish newspaper, the socialist daily Forvertz, was one of these early revolutionaries and was the first to use Yiddish to reach Jewish workers. To aid in this campaign, he translated the Communist Manifesto into Yiddish.
Cahan was one of the founders of The Forward “ an American Yiddish publication, and was its editor-in-chief for 43 years.
JEWS FIRST TOOK OVER THE PORN INDUSTRY AND THEN THEY TOOK OVER HOLLYWOOD
Jewish labor leader who was also of Sephardic origin – JEW Daniel DeLeon - was the dominant figure in the first major socialist organization in the U.S. - the Socialist Labor Party (SLP). An immigrant from Curacao, a American socialist newspaper editor, politician, Marxist theoretician, and trade union organizer.
He is regarded as the forefather of the idea of revolutionary industrial unionism and was the leading figure in the Socialist Labor Party of America from 1890 until the time of his death in 1914
Caribbean island ruled by the Dutch, he was, for a brief period, a popular figure among East European Jews
Jew Lenin saying on the fifth anniversary of the revolution, "..What we have done in Russia is accept the De Leon interpretation of Marxism, that is what the Bolsheviki adopted in 1917.
Jew Morris Winchevsky a prominent Jewish socialist leader in London and the United States in the late 19th century founded what would later become the largest Yiddish-language daily newspaper in the world, The Forward in 1897. He was subsequently associated with the Communist Party USA and its Yiddish daily Morgen Freiheit.
Commie Jew Morris Rosenfeld was a Yiddish poet. He was a delegate to the Fourth Zionist Congress at London in 1900, and gave readings at Harvard University in 1898
He wrote this verse:
The sweatshop at midday - I will draw you a picture;
A battlefield bloody; the conflict at rest;
Around and about me the corpses are lying;
The blood cries aloud from the earth's gory breast.
A moment... and hark! The loud signal is sounded,
And dead rise again and renewed in their fight...
They struggle, these corpses; for strangers, for strangers!
They struggle, they fall and they sink into the night.
Not only were poems like this widely read, they were put to music and sung by Jewish workers.
During Jewish Holiday of Yom Kippur in 1899, Commie Jew Benjamin Feigenbaum famously said in alternative event "If there is a God and if he is Almighty as the clergy claims he is, I give him just two minutes’ time to kill me on the spot, so that he may prove his existence!" after two minutes he declared "See! There is no God!".
JEWESS Clara Lemlich was the founding member of the Communist Party in 1919. As a housewife during the US Depression, she organized rent strikes and boycotts over high meat prices. She also participated in the Emma Lazarus Clubs, founded by Jewish commie women to fight for social justice and support left-wing Yiddish institutions.
The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), members of which are commonly termed "Wobblies", is an international commie labor union that was founded in 1905 in Chicago, Illinois, in the United States. The union combines general unionism with industrial unionism, as it is a general union, subdivided between the various industries which employ its members. The philosophy and tactics of the IWW are described as "revolutionary industrial unionism", with ties to both socialist and anarchist labor movements.
Fellowship archives state that crypto Jew Abraham Vereide wanted his movement to “carry out its objective through personal, trusting, informal, unpublicized contact between people.”
Vereide’s establishment of his Prayer Breakfast Movement for anti-Socialist and anti-International Workers of the World (IWW or “Wobblies”) Jewish Seattle businessmen in 1935 coincided with the establishment of another pro-Nazi Jewish German organization in the United States, the German-American Bund.
Amerikadeutscher Bund; Amerikadeutscher Volksbund, AV was created by Jew Hitler..using Jew Heinz Spanknöbel..
German Jew Rothschild sent Jew Heinz Spanknöbel to USA as a christian minister in 1929 ( crypto Jew Seventh Day Adventist Church in Wurtzenburg, Germany )
Vereide saw his prayer movement replacing labor unions.
Jew Heinz Spanknöbel infiltrated the Ford Motor Company.
The Bund sponsored by Abraham Veredie was to consist only of American citizens of German Jew descent
With Rothschild’s help Jew Heinz Spanknöbel formed the Friends of New Germany, which was a mouthpiece for Jew Hitler in USA.
Communism was based on Mad Darwin’s “finch science” lies. Communism unequivocally failed wherever it was attempted. Men crave power. And once obtained, it is virtually impossible to relinquish, for what powerful men want, is often more power.
Marx cannot impress Indians with Calculus as we invented Calculus
It is a kosher lie that Marx, a lawyer knew Math.. His whole book Das Kapital abounds with “lawyer chicanery”..
Read the link below.. What the fuck is all this ? If this is not abuse of Math to baffle the common man , what is it ?
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Mathematical_Manuscripts_1881.pdf
Like I said before Rothschild arranged for a mathematician Jewess Sofya Aleksandrovna Yanovskaya to insert Math in Marx’s Das Kapital to make this stupid book look respectable..
Note: The types of math used in economics are primarily algebra, calculus and statistics. Algebra is used to make computations such as total cost and total revenue. Calculus is used to find the derivatives of utility curves, profit maximization curves and growth models.
MATH IS OBJECTIVE.. IT PROVIDES TUNNEL VISION..
ECONOMICS MUST HAVE CONDOR VISION AND SUBJECTIVE MUST HOLD VETO POWER.
IMAGINE MAD CUNTS ARE USING MATH TO DO RISK ANALYSIS AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS.
.
TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE FURTHER READ THE POST BELOW..
The practice of how mainstream economics uses mathematics is abusive and is an attempt by Jew Rothschild to fool the masses regarding the "science" economists practice.
The ubiquity of mathematical theory in economics also has serious downsides: it creates a high barrier to entry for those who want to participate in the professional dialogue, and makes checking someone’s work excessively laborious. Worst of all, it imbues economic theory with unearned empirical authority.
Calculus, was originally called infinitesimal calculus or "the calculus of infinitesimals", is the mathematical study of continuous change, in the same way that geometry is the study of shape and algebra is the study of generalizations of arithmetic operations.
It has two major branches, differential calculus and integral calculus; the former concerns instantaneous rates of change, and the slopes of curves, while integral calculus concerns accumulation of quantities, and areas under or between curves.
Calculus helps us understand changes between values that are related by a function. ...
All these formulas are functions of time, and so that is one way to think of calculus — studying functions of time.
Differential calculus is applied to original supply and demand models to determine how different factors will shift the lines representing supply or demand in the economic market.
Common mathematical techniques in microeconomics courses include geometry, order of operations, balancing equations and using derivatives for comparative statistics.
Mathematical economics is the application of mathematical methods to represent theories and analyze problems in economics.
By convention, these applied methods are beyond simple geometry, such as differential and integral calculus, difference and differential equations, matrix algebra, mathematical programming, and other computational methods.
Proponents of this approach claim that it allows the formulation of theoretical relationships with rigor, generality, and simplicity MY LEFT BALL !
The language of mathematics allows economists to make specific, positive claims about controversial or contentious subjects that would be impossible without mathematics.
Much of economic theory is currently presented in terms of mathematical economic models, a set of stylized and simplified mathematical relationships asserted to clarify assumptions and implications.
Broad applications include:--
optimization problems as to goal equilibrium, whether of a household, business firm, or policy maker
static (or equilibrium) analysis in which the economic unit (such as a household) or economic system (such as a market or the economy) is modeled as not changing
comparative statics as to a change from one equilibrium to another induced by a change in one or more factors
dynamic analysis, tracing changes in an economic system over time, for example from economic growth.
Mathematical optimization (alternatively spelled optimisation) or mathematical programming is the selection of a best element (with regard to some criterion) from some set of available alternatives
CUNT AMARTYA SEN EVEN USED MATH TO EXPLAIN FAMINE MODELS .
Adam Smith had published his Wealth of Nations in 1776. The earliest economists were philosophers who used deduction and logic to explain the market.
Smith deployed numerical analysis only as a means of qualitatively assessing government policies such as legislated grain prices and their impact. No graphs or equations were used.
Jew Rothschild used Das capital to convince the masses that economics is a science—like physics or chemistry.
The "abuse of mathematics" certainly happens: producers and consumers of economic theory tend to not question/worry/have nightmares about "the premises", to the extent that they should.
But once we leave the premises unchallenged, the conclusions become "undeniable truth", since they have been derived in the rigorous mathematical way. This is like “how can there be shit on Oxford street”..
A major issue in macroeconomics is that every policy decision must be self-referential. It's very easy to accidentally assume that some small actor won't change their decision making slightly in an unexpected way that makes the whole thing fall apart. It's also very easy to make the mathematics look airtight.
In more microeconomic situations, you have assumptions about how the world will function. This is most easily seen by developing an AI which can make a killing when fed historical data, but which fails utterly in the real market.
The problem with math as used in modern economics is that the math is often used to describe models of human behavior. Modeling human behavior, whether with math or otherwise, is IMPOSSIBLE over long time scales, if our goal is to make the model match reality .
Mathematical models of human behavior are by their very nature bound to fail in multitudinous ways, so that the detailed economic models built by economists do not match reality and don't have clear practical utility.
Economics must move away from modeling human behavior and move towards modeling institutions, governments, companies, etc. and the dynamics involving these agents.
Economics is a social science, not an empirical or laboratory one. It is the study of human behavior in response to competing demands in an environment of scarcity.
Human behavior cannot be predicted with mathematical precision — the only way to do it is to make large numbers of gratuitous and unsupportable assumptions about what people will do under a given set of circumstances.
It is impossible to quantify human action. Although equations, such as utility measures, do exist to quantify human behavior, they are faulty when examined. How can an equation tell me when I am no longer satisfied with a certain good? There cannot be “catch-all” formulas due to the complexity of economic phenomena.
Measuring the elasticity of demand for a certain good is at best a contribution to economic history. Elasticity will hardly be constant in the same country throughout time, let alone in other countries.
Economics, among other things, is the study of the allocation of scarce resources. Economics is more related to jurisprudence than math. Mathematics has a place at best for budgets and debt servicing—but it should be recognized that mathematically-driven economics is a divergence from the foundation of traditional economics.
I WONDER WHAT MATH SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY ( WHO WORE A MOSSAD SPONSORED SIKH TURBAN IN 1976 ) DID TO CONVINCE PM CHANDRASHEKHAR TO SELL 47 TONNES OF OUR PRISTINE GOLD TO ROTHSCHILD IN 1977.
Marx used irony and the idea of inner contractions as a logical method of interpreting economic history. This was not a method that could well be expressed mathematically.
Although Marx used arithmetic examples to illustrate the rates of profit and surplus value for enterprises employing differing proportions of labor and capital, this was not a mathematical model of the economy.
The Communist Manifesto hardly could be expressed in mathematical formulae, and no Marxist tried to express dialectical materialism mathematically.
Many economists are trained in calculus and higher mathematics without feeling much need to test their theories quantitatively. They tend to use mathematics less as an empirical measuring tool than as an expository language, or simply as a decoration to give a seemingly scientific veneer to their policy prescriptions
- SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED..
CAPTAIN..
YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS PLANET WHO CAN EXHUME TRUTHS. AND YOU HAVE SAID BEFORE “THE REAL REVELATIONS WITH COME WHEN YOU REACH THE 98% SEGMENT”.. AND YOU ARE NOW AT 60%..
CAPTAIN, PLEASE TELL WHY YOU SAY “TAJ MAHAL IS A HINDU MONUMENT”.
WELL,
EVER SINCE I EXPLAINED “QUTAB MINAR IS A HINDU MONUMENT”, MUSLIMS HAVE QUIETLY ACCEPTED IT ..
BECAUSE I EXPLAINED THE TOWER HAS TO BEEN SEEN FROM A HOVERING HELICOPTER FROM TOP, TO REALIZE WHAT IT MEANS . AND IT IS “NO CONTEST” AFTER THIS REVELATION..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/09/qutab-minar-was-dhruv-stambh-vishnu.html
IN THE POST ABOVE I HAVE GIVEN SOME PICTURES OF THE INNARDS OF TAJ MAHAL.
I HAVE POSTED PHOTOS OF THE TAJ MAHAL SPIRE, AND THE HUGE MOSAIC ON THE FLOOR OF THE TAJ MAHAL SHOWING THE SPIRE IN 2D..
IT IS CLEARLY A KALASHA KUMBHAM… THE MOST POTENT SYMBOL OF SANATANA DHARMA..
IN 1975 I HAVE SEEN THE SAME KALASHA KUMBHAM AT ISTANBUL, ON THE FLOOR OF THE SOPHIA HAGIA MOSQUE. EXACTLY LIKE IN TAJ MAHAL.
I SAW TRIDENT ( TRISHUL ) MOTIFS ON THE INNER DOME OF SOPHIA HAGUE DOME AND IT IS STILL THERE..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-roman-pantheon-inaugurated.html
NOW –
TIME TO THINK CLEARLY.
TAJ MAHAL HAS FOUR MINARETS.. THIS IS NOT A ISLAM THINGY THOUGH MUSLIMS MAY CLAIM SO..
IN ISLAM MOSQUES JUST HAVE ONE MINARET FOR THE AZAN CALL.
THE SOPHIA HAGIA CHURCH IN ISTANBUL ALSO HAS FOUR MINARETS. WHY SHOULD A CHURCH HAVE FOUR MINARETS ?
SOPHIA HAGIA MONUMENT WAS FIRST A HINDU TEMPLE THEN A CHURCH , THEN A MOSQUE AND TODAY IT IS A MUSEUM.
THE SOPHIA HAGIA TEMPLE WAS BUILT BY ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT ..
JEWESS HELENA THE MOTHER OF HINDU EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT CAUSED THE ROMAN EMPIRE CAPITAL TO BE SHIFTED FROM ROME TO ISTANBUL ( CONSTANTINOPLE ) IN 330 AD..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/istanbul-deep-seat-of-jewish-deep-state.html
THE REASON WAS ROME DID NOT GENERATE MONEY. WHILE CONSTANTINOPLE WAS THE HUB OF SPICES EXPORTED BY CALICUT KING ( MY HOMETOWN ).
SPICE WENT BY SHIP TO GWADAR PORT , THEN BY OVERLAND ROUTE BY CARAVAN TILL GEORGIA BATUMI AND FROM THERE BY SHIP TO CONSTANTINOPE ( ISTANBUL ).. FROM THERE THE WHITE JEWS TOOK OVER AS MIDDLEMEN.
THIS IS WHY THE CURRENT WHITE JEWS IN ISRAEL ARE KHAZARS FROM GEORGIA.
CONSTANTINE THE GREAT WAS POISONED BY HIS SON AND THEN BAPTIZED WITHIN A HOUR OF HIS DEATH FROM HINDUISM TO CHRISTIANITY ON 22ND MAY 337 AD...
CONSTANTINE THE GREAT TOOK LESS THAN 5 YEARS TO BUILD SOPHIA HAGIA CHURCH.. WELL, HE WAS A HINDU, WHY SHOULD HE BUILD A CHURCH ?? .
AND IT TOOK JUST 5 YEARS TO BUILD SUCH A HUGE STRUCTURE?? ,OH YEAH ? IT IS IMPOSSIBLE..
THE MARBLE STATUE OF CONSTANTINE THE GREAT EXISTED INSIDE THE SOPHIA HAGIA AND IT WAS REMOVED BY SULTAN MEHMED II ON 29TH MAY 1453...
AFTER CONSTANTINE THE GREAT WAS MURDERED BY HIS SON, THE HINDU ( PAGAN ) MOTIFS WERE CHISELED/ GROUND OFF AND HINDU GOD IDOLS SMASHED. ..
BUT THE CHRISTIAN SON WHO CONVERTED THE HINDU SHIVA TEMPLE INTO A SOPHIA HAGIA CHURCH NEGLECTED TO REMOVE THE HUGE TOP KALASHA KUMBHAM SPIRE .. WHICH WAS MADE OF GOLD INFUSED WITH IRRIDIUM EXACTLY LIKE IN TAJ MAHAL.
IN 1857 ROTHSCHILD REMOVED THE TAJ MAHAL SPIRE AND MELTED IT AND CARTED IT AWAY TO GERMANY AND INSTALLED A DUPLICATE IN PLACE , WHICH IS WHAT YOU SEE TODAY..
ON MAY 29TH 1453, TURK SULTAN MEHMED II CONQUERED CONSTANTINOPLE.. EMPEROR CONSTANINE XI WAS KILLED IN BATTLE..
THE FIRST THING KING MEHMED II DID WAS TO REMOVE ALL CHRISTIAN ARTIFACTS AND INSTALL ISLAMIC ONES.
MEHMED II CONSTRICTED A WOODEN MINARAT FOR THE AZAN CALL. NOW SOPHIA HAGIA WAS A CONVERSION FROM HINDU TEMPLE TO CHURCH TO MOSQUE
MEHMED IIs BLOOD MOTHER WAS A JEWESS NAMED HUMA HATUN. BUT AT A YOUNG AGE HIS FATHER MURAD II MADE HIS SERBIAN STEPMOTHER TAKE CARE OF HIM FAR AWAY FOR SAFETY .. REASON--MEHMED IIs ELDER CROWN PRINCE BROTHER WAS STRANGULATED TO DEATH ..
CONTINUED TO 2-
BELOW: IRIDIUM INFUSED TOP SPIRE ON MAIN DOME INTERACTS WITH IRIDIUM TIPPED MINARETS TO CREATE ST ELMOs FIRE
THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THE SCALAR FIELD OF BRAHMAN
IN THE LINK BELOW-- CAPTAIN AHAB BLOWS OUT THE FIRE FROM THE TIP OF HIS HARPOON
https://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/42/moby-dick/800/chapter-119-the-candles/
THE TIP OF THE EGYPTIAN PYRAMID AT GIZA WOULD GLOW BLUE ORGONE PLASMA AT WILL, AND COULD BE SEEN THOUSANDS OF KMS AWAY
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/10/eight-sided-pyramid-of-giza-egypt.html
WHILE DEFENDER OF CONSTANTINOPLE CAPTAIN GIOVANNI GIUSTINIANI ( A BRAVE AND RESOURCEFUL SEA PIRATE TURNED MERCENARY ) STOOD TRANSFIXED BY THE FLAME, HE WAS TAKEN OUT BY AN SNIPER ARROW..
THE SIEGE WAS OVER AT THAT VERY MOMENT.
MEHMED II HAD A WHITE FLAG MEETING WITH CHRISTIAN CAPTAIN GIOVANNI GIUSTINIANI HIM.. OFFERED HIM THREE TIME MORE PRIZE MONEY AND ALSO PROMISED TO MAKE HIM KING OF THE AEGEAN ISLANDS.. BEING A MAN OF HONOR , HE REFUSED..
MEHMED II HAD A WHITE FLAG MEETING WITH CHRISTIAN CAPTAIN GIOVANNI GIUSTINIANI HIM.. OFFERED HIM THREE TIME MORE PRIZE MONEY AND ALSO PROMISED TO MAKE HIM KING OF THE AEGEAN ISLANDS.. BEING A MAN OF HONOR , HE REFUSED..
ONLY FIVE YEARS TO CONSTRUCT ?
OH YEAH ?
IT WILL TAKE MORE THAN 15 YEARS TO EVEN BUILD THE FOUNDATION OF SOPHIA HAGUE AS THERE IS A MASSIVE WATER TUNNEL SYSTEM UNDERNEATH.
JEWS / CHRISTIANS/ MUSLIMS /ATHEISTS DO NOT WANT THESE 12,000 YEAR OLD TUNNELS TO BE SCIENTIFICALLY DATED AND HENCE ( LIKE TAJ MAHAL ) IS BRICKED UP
THERE ARE HINDU ( PAGAN ) MOTIFS ON THE PILLARS OF THE UNDERGROUND TUNNELS
PAGAN MOTIFS HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO CHRISTIAN LORE.. THIS IS NO BULLSHIT MEDUSA.. EVEN IF IT IS MEDUSA , IT IS FAR FAR OLDER THAN CHRISTIANITY.
GIANT AQUEDUCTS FAR OLDER THAN SOPHIA HAGUE BRING WATER TO THE UNDERGROUND TUNNELS OF SOPHIA HAGUE
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-roman-pantheon-inaugurated.html
BRICKED UP 12,000 YEAR OLD KERALA DANAVA CIVILIZATION HISTORY OF THE SOPHIA HAGIA HINDU TEMPLE..
AFTER ALL , AS PER THE BIBLE ( COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA IN 325 AD ) , THE BIG BANG HAPPENED ON 23RD OCT , 9 AM IN 4004 BC
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-12000-year-old-baalbek.html
FALSIFICATION OF ANCIENT HINDU SPIRITUAL HISTORY WAS THE NO 1 AGENDA OF JEW KARL MARX AND HIS BOSS JEW ROTHSCHILD ..
THERE COULD BE NO WORLD HISTORY OLDER THAN 6000 YEARS ..
FREEMASON NEHRU PLAYED BALL IN HIS “GLIMPSES OF WORLD HISTORY BOOK
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gegVPC_bRCs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLLS73hw8XE
THIS HINDU MONASTRY IS 30 CENTURIES OLDER THAN CHRISTIANITY
PROPHET ELIJAH WAS COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA
CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE SAYS THAT ELIJAH APPEARED WITH MOSES DURING THE TRANSFIGURATION OF JESUS.
MOSES NEVER EXISTED—HE WAS COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/12/helena-mother-of-roman-emperor.html
IN ISLAM, ELIJAH APPEARS IN THE QURAN AS A PROPHET AND MESSENGER OF GOD, WHERE HIS BIBLICAL NARRATIVE OF PREACHING AGAINST THE WORSHIPERS OF BAAL IS RECOUNTED IN A CONCISE FORM
DURING JESUS' CRUCIFIXION, SOME OF THE ONLOOKERS WONDER IF ELIJAH WILL COME TO RESCUE HIM, AS BY THE TIME OF JESUS, ELIJAH HAD ENTERED FOLKLORE AS A RESCUER OF JEWS IN DISTRESS.
JESUS NEVER EXISTED.. HE WAS COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA IN 325 AD
A MAP OF MOUNTAIN-CULTS OF ZEUS SHOWS THAT MOST OF THESE SITES ARE NOW DEDICATED TO ELIAS, INCLUDING MOUNT OLYMPUS, MOUNT LYKAION, MOUNT ARACHNAION, AND MOUNT TALETON ON THE MAINLAND, AND MOUNT KENAION, MOUNT OCHE, AND MOUNT KYNADOS IN THE ISLANDS.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/05/thor-zeus-marduk-brihaspati-and-jupiter.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
LEFT TO RIGHT-- SRINIVASAN, VADAKAYIL, MASCERENHAS , PANDE ..
PLAYING BACK THE OLD NOSTALGIA LADEN SONG OF "REMEMBER WHEN "..
COMMENTS IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED
MAKE COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW--
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_12.html
MAKE COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW--
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_12.html
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
ADAM SMITH IS BEING KICKED INTO VADAKAYILs GARBAGE BUCKET.
GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:
1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
2 NOAM CHOMSKY
3 SIGMUND FREUD
4) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
5) AMARTYA SEN
6) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
7) IMMANUEL KANT
8 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
9) ALBERT EINSTEIN
10) ISAAC NEWTON
11) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
12) CHARLES DARWIN
13) KARL MARX
14) MAX WEBER
15) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
16) FIBONACCI
17) EDWARD BERNAYS
18) JOHN DEWEY
19) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
20 PETER D OUPENSKY
21) OPRAH WINFREY
22) RICHARD BANDLER AND JOHN GRINDER
23) CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
24) STEPHEN HAWKING
25) SIDNEY HOOK
26) ALFRED KINSEY
27) BARACK OBAMA
28) AYN RAND
29) WILHELM WUNDT
30) RENE DESCARTES.
31) EMPRESS HELENA
32) RAYMOND IV
33) SAINT MOTHER TERESA
34) LENIN
35) ENGELS
38) ADAM SMITH
########################
BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “
1) NIKOLA TESLA
2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
3) IE IRODOV
4) ARYABHATTA ( 2700 BC)
5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
6) CHANAKYA ( 372 BC )
7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA ( 2000 BC )
8) APOLLONIUS OF TYANA ( KERALA SAGE WHOSE LEGACY WAS USURPED BY COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )
9) "JOHN DOE"
10) JULIAN ASSANGE
11) SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA
12) GARY STEPHEN WEBB
13) GEORGE ORWELL.
13) CESAR MILLAN
14) HENRY FORD.
15) PANINI ( 5500 BC )
16) BHARTRHARI ( 7000 BC )
17) PATANJALI ( 5000 BC )
18) MANU (8300 BC)
19) YASKA ( 5800 BC )
20) JOHN CARMAC
21) QUEEN DIDO ( 1600 BC )
22) KANADA MUNI ( 6500 BC )
23) VARAHAMIHIRA ( 2660 BC )
24) VARARUCHI ( 2830 BC )
25) VIROCHANA ( 10, 650 BC )
26) MAHABALI ( 10,600 BC )
27) KALANAMI ( 10500 BC )
28) IMHOTEP / AYYAPPA ( 3900 BC )
29) PROF HYPATIA
30) SWARBANU
31) PUTIN
32) EDWARD SNOWDEN
CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----
1) SUHEL SETH
2) PRITISH NANDI
3) DILIP CHERIAN
4) PRANNOY JAMES ROY
5) AROON PURIE
6) VINEET JAIN
7) SHEKHAR GUPTA
8) SAGARIKA GHOSE AND HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI
9) SHOBHAA DE
10) SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN AND WIFE NANDINI SUNDAR
11) KAMALHAASAN
12) AUDREY TRUSCHKE
13) NOSTRODAMUS
14) MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
15) VERGHESE KURIEN
16) MS SWAMINATHAN
17) DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
18) SANJAY R HEGDE
19) MARK ZUCKERBERG
20) JACK DORSEY
21) THOMAS L FRIEDMAN
22) ROMILA THAPAR
23) IRFAN HABIB
24) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
25) SHELDON POLLOCK
26) WENDY DONIGER
27) BARKHA DUTT
28) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
29) SWARA BHASKAR
30) KARAN THAPAR
31) ADAM D ANGELO
32) SAINT CRYIL ARCHBISHOP OF ALEXANDRIA
33) N RAM
34) GRETA THUNBERG
35) MK GANDHI
36) SONIA GANDHI
37) TED KACZYNSKI
38) ZOYA HASAN