JEWISH BILLIONAIRES ARE STEALING MILLIONS OF ACRES OF LAND USING ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’ AS THEIR JUSTIFICATION
FILTHY RICH AND EVIL JEWS FEEL THAT THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO EFFECTIVELY BARCODE NATURE. AIYOO IPPIDI MAAN PAAKKAVAI ILLAI.
DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAPS ARE FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS IN WHICH A PORTION OF A DEVELOPING NATION'S FOREIGN DEBT IS FORGIVEN BY JEW MONEY BAGS IN EXCHANGE FOR LOCAL INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION MEASURES.
IT IS A TOOL FOR JEWS TO GRAB LAND AND STEAL IN DESPERATELY POOR NATIONS, FOR A SONG
Debt-for-nature swaps are as the name suggests- a poor debtor country is allowed substantial discounts on the debt owed to its Jewish creditor in exchange for investments towards conservation ( sic ) and enacting environmental protection measures ( sic ).
A swap for a debtor country’s foreign debt can involve a creditor country, a Jewish creditor commercial bank or an environmental Jewish non-governmental organisation acting as a broker.
These policies have never ever been successful in promoting environmental conservation, instead they exacerbate existing wealth and social inequalities in developing nations..
As global debt rates continue to rise, we must safeguard poor developing countries from Jewish predators.
DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAPS NEVER HELP A POOR NATION.. DEBT RELIEF DEALS POSE A MAJOR RISK TO A DEVELOPING COUNTRY’S SOVEREIGNTY.
Impoverished debtor countries are at a high risk of defaulting on their payments, and therefore Jewish debt buyers can purchase outstanding debt for significantly discounted prices at well below face value.
This prerequisite characteristic for swaps to work emerged in 1982, when a secondary market was formed that allowed Jewish banks to sell and trade foreign debt at discounted rates.
In the case of debt-for-nature swaps, creditor entities can employ the secondary market to divest their outstanding loan payments to a Jewish NGOs at discounted rates by lowering the interest rate, changing the currency of the debt amount or refinancing the debt at a current lower market value.
Since debt-for-nature swaps create a relatively easy exit from debt payments at a high risk of defaulting, they are touted as beneficial to all involved parties.
For debtor countries, they become at least partially free of their burdensome foreign debt. For creditor entities, they are able to absolve themselves of high-risk debt relations. BRAAAYYYY
In 1987, the environmental NGO Conservation International arranged the world’s first debt-for-nature swap, forgiving a portion of impoverished Bolivia’s foreign debt. The agreement cancelled USD $650 000 of Bolivia’s debt.
In exchange, the Bolivian government agreed to set aside 3.7 million acres of prime land adjacent to the Amazon Basin for conservation purposes. Jews laugh over bandy and cigars
This exchange is an example of a three-party swap, which involves a debtor, a creditor and an environmental NGO acting as a broker. In addition to Conservation International, the Nature Conservancy and WWF controlled by the Jewish deep state have been frequent mediators of debt-for-nature swaps.
In a three-party swap, a Jewish NGO purchases an outstanding debt from the creditor through the secondary market at significantly discounted rates, and then renegotiates the debt obligation with the debtor country.
The NGO then sells the debt back to the debtor country for a higher price than it was bought by the NGO but still significantly lower than the original payment the debtor country would have had to make.
When the debtor repurchases its debt, the obligation is forgiven, and some of the leftover capital that would have gone into paying off the original commitment are funnelled into grants, bonds or funds that will be directed towards pre-agreed upon conservation investments or enacting environmental policies.
In addition to three-party swaps, bilateral swaps directly between debtor and creditor countries have become increasingly popular. With this type of swap, a creditor country usually restructures a portion of a country’s obligations, or sells the debt to the debtor at a discount.
Funds for conservation or environmental policy initiatives are raised through interest payments on restructured debt or from the debtor country’s leftover reserves after purchasing their debt at a discounted price. Bilateral swaps can also be multilateral, involving multiple countries.
Since debt can be purchased at well below its face value, large portions of a country’s foreign debt can be forgiven by allocating relatively small amounts of money from creditor governments and NGOs..
For instance, the US and Peru engaged in a bilateral swap in 2002, which was subsidised by several NGOs. The Nature Conservancy, Conservation International and WWF donated a total of $1.1 million, while the US government allocated $5.5 million to forgive a portion of Peru’s debt to the United States.
Since Peru’s foreign debt could be purchased and forgiven at discounted rates well below its face value, these investments allowed a total of $14.3 million of Peru’s foreign debt to be forgiven between 2002 and 2018, of which $10.6 million was to be set aside for conservation projects. Jews were thrilled..
While bilateral and multilateral swaps are led by states, environmental NGOs continue to play an important role in these initiatives, contributing expertise and services in facilitating a country’s investments towards conservation measures.
The major difference between these swaps and the three-party variants is that, in bilateral or multilateral agreements, creditors normally decide what policy agenda will be enacted in the debtor country. In three-party swaps, NGOs tend to collaborate closely with debtors and local governments to decide what kosher measures should be implemented.
There was a huge the negative social fallout of the 1987 Bolivian swap deal, a 1989 bilateral swap between the US and Madagascar and a 1990 three-party swap in Costa Rica. In each country, the binding nature of the swap deals left many indigenous peoples and sustenance farmers landless and mired in poverty.
In Costa Rica, displaced farmers had to resort to illegal poaching, logging and mining to survive. Debt-for-nature swaps exacerbate poverty and worsen living conditions defeat their own purpose.
The United Nations Development Programme released a report in 2017 overviewing the practice and evaluating the benefits and potential risks of debt-for-nature swaps.
UNDP controlled by Jews found that swaps could measurably improve a country’s credit standing and grant its government access to important kosher financial services for economic and social development
Debt-for-nature swaps produce only wee debt reductions and generate far less funding than the face value of the debt purchased in the secondary market. The government of the indebted country is still responsible for payment of the debt, albeit to a Jewish conservation organization rather than to the creditor.
Critics of debt-for-nature swaps do not generate funds where the needs are greatest
Debt for nature swaps are usually actioned by a pupper ruler installed by the Jewish Deep state , not the impoverished peasantry who traditionally have owned or at least used the land in question.
Debt-for-nature Shylock swaps alwaysoverlook the poor people surviving / living on the land set aside for conservation
Kosher environmental protection programs have always been imperialistic The establishment of national parks in Africa led to the impoverishment and displacement of local populations. This kind of intervention is kosher eco-colonialism.
Belize’s barrier reef is a marvel of biodiversity. Stretching 170 miles through the warm waters of the Caribbean and around atolls, cays, and coastal lagoons, the Western Hemisphere’s longest reef is home to some 1,400 species, from endangered hawksbill turtles and manatees to several threatened types of sharks.
Belize signed a debt-for-nature swap with The Nature Conservancy (TNC), a Jewish environmental organization, which reduced the country’s external debt by a 8 percent of GDP.
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) announced it had developed a new asset class and listing vehicle aimed at “preserving and restoring the natural assets that ultimately underlie the ability for there to be life on Earth.” The vehicle, known as natural asset company, or NAC
NAC, will enable the formation of specialized firms “that own the rights to the ecosystem services produced on a certain piece of land, such as carbon sequestration or clean water.” The natural assets that these NACs commodify will subsequently be maintained, managed, and grown by them.
The public launch of NACs strategically preceded the fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the biggest biodiversity conference in a decade.
Under the pretext of turning 30% of the globe into “protected areas”, the largest global land grab in history is underway. Built on a foundation of Jewish supremacy, this proposal will displace hundreds of millions, furthering the ongoing genocide of Indigenous peoples.
The ‘assets’ from Nature’s Economy are valued at more than US$5,000 trillion or $4 quadrillion (the current economy is valued at approx. US$502 trillion; that makes the current economy around only 8% the value of the Nature’s Economy)
The ownership through NACs allows domination of not just the economy, but the entire natural world
So many practices today are reframing freedom as a service or a privilege, not a fundamental right
Owners will dictate who gets access to clean water, clean air, wild spaces and yet untapped, dwindling natural resources.
These new NACs will act a bit like real estate agents for Mother Nature. Imagine a situation where a company is able to pick an area of nature, assign it a price, disenfranchise any prior claimants, take ownership and then sell pieces of that land/lake/ocean/mountain etc. to institutional shareholders — specifically, the Jewish multinational corporations who have funded the NAC in the first place.
Jewish NACs will assign value to services — such as carbon retention, freshwater generation, pest control, groundwater storage and erosion prevention — intrinsically provided by natural resources.
New York Stock Exchange (of course) announced the new security, as a “nature-based solution to unlock the value of natural resources.” CHOO CHWEET APPAAAHHH.
An NAC is basically a Jewish real estate agent for Mother Nature. It picks a piece of nature, assigns a price tag, wrangles the rights out of the commons, and sells slices of that lake/ocean/volcano/mountain/etc to institutional shareholders, specifically, the Jewish multinational corporations who fund the NAC in the first place.
NACs will assign value to services — such as carbon retention, freshwater generation, pest control, groundwater storage and erosion prevention — intrinsically provided by natural resources .” 1
So once they’ve assigned a price to every atom in the atmosphere, what next?
Proceeds from an NAC initial public offering (IPO) will be used to manage the specific natural asset and potentially acquire additional natural assets or return value to the owners.
They’ll maximize profits and acquire additional natural resources.
The elites won’t stop until they wring a profit from every living inch of planet earth.
Whenever you hear “governments” and “private sector” in the same sentence, it’s the same thing as saying “corporations are colluding with corrupt politicians again.”
In the battle of sustainability versus profit, the former has never won against the latter. There’s simply no track record that suggests we can trust Jewish corporations to do what’s right for people and our planet.
According to initial calculations, NACs will unlock $ 5 quadrillion (that’s five million billion dollars ) in assets as a new feeding ground for Wall Street Jewish investors to buy the rights to clean water and clean air and trout streams and bass-laden lakes and gorgeous picturesque waterfalls and lagoons, an entire forest, or maybe eventually extend into the oceans.
Who knows the range of possibilities once nature is transacted on Wall Street.
A democracy with a honest patriotic ruler would never allow NACs to exist.
But, of course, there isn’t a single democratic nation on planet earth.
We’ve got a handful of dictatorships, and a whole bunch of corporatocracies.
In the same way that African dictators have looted their nations to fill their personal bank accounts in London and Geneva, corporate-captured politicians are now allowing their backers to ransack the nations they’ve sworn to serve.
If Jewish corporations were serious about protecting the environment and promoting sustainability, they wouldn’t take a giant gun and sticker a price tag on every piece of nature.
Jewish Corporations are anti-human extraction machines whose sole legal purpose for existing is to extract profits from anyone and anything for the private benefit of its shareholders.
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) a lap dog of the Jewish Deep state announced it had developed a new asset class and listing vehicle aimed at “preserving and restoring the natural assets that ultimately underlie the ability for there to be life on Earth.”
The vehicle, known as a natural asset company, or NAC, will enable the formation of specialized firms “that own the rights to the ecosystem services produced on a certain piece of land, such as carbon sequestration or clean water.”
The natural assets that these NACs commodify will subsequently be maintained, managed, and grown by them.
NACs will use the funds from newly obtained and monetized natural assets to help fight climate change by ‘preserving’ the rain forests, mountains, and lakes mostly abroad. They also vow to change the “conventional agricultural production practices” of farms to make them more efficient and sustainable.
The ultimate kosher goal of Jewish natural asset company, or NAC is to extract trillions in profits from natural processes such as photosynthesis, apply intrinsic values to natural processes, and then monetize it.
“Our hope is that owning a natural asset company is going to be a way that an increasingly broad range of investors have the ability to invest in something that’s intrinsically valuable, but, up to this point, was really excluded from the financial markets,” said NYSE COO Jew Michael Blaugrund upon the launch of the NAC idea. BRAAAYYY..
On their website the Intrinsic Exchange Group states that they are “using Intrinsic value as the umbrella for values not yet identified or quantified, as well as values such as cultural, social, aesthetic, spiritual, etc.”
Following the launch, Fortune Magazine noted that NACs allow for a ‘new form of sustainable investment’ which has caught the ears of BlackRock CEO Jew Larry Fink along with countless other infamous Jewish investors.
In 2019, the IEG teamed up with NYSE — which itself holds a minority stake — to launch the idea of NACs. The top three Jewish investors in the IEG are the Rockefeller Foundation, Aberdare Ventures, a venture capital firm founded by Paul Klingenstein focused mainly on digital healthcare, and the Inter-American Development Bank, which is the largest source of development financing for Latin America.
The Inter-American Development Bank and the Rockefeller Foundation both have been tied to pushes for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and biometric Digital IDs.
The Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) evaluates the development effectiveness of the World Bank Group.
According to the IEG, the plan is to pioneer “a new asset class based on natural assets, and the mechanism to convert them to financial capital.” The new ‘assets’ according to the group are all of which make “life on Earth possible and enjoyable, and include biological systems that provide clean air, water, foods, and medicines.”
Put simply, entire ecosystems and the benefits people receive from them, will become financial assets. Assets will include food production, tourism, clean water, biodiversity, pollination, and even carbon sequestration. The assets will then be owned by Jewish corporations, and stocks in these assets will be sold on Wallstreet.
The “New International Economic Order” was nothing less than a massive resource grab to suck everything into the hands of a narrow group of Jewish oligarchs. This was later revealed as “Sustainable Development”, aka Technocracy. How else could the WEF say, “You will own nothing and be happy”? Well, somebody has to own everything!
Technocracy was a “resource based” economic system where everything is managed for the “common good” by scientists and engineers bribed and hney trapped by the Jewsih Deep state . The UN’s Sustainable Development economic model is based on Technocracy and promotes the management of all resources on earth, by “science” of course.
The Jewish ‘Intrinsic Exchange Group‘ (IEG) promises to save us from this catastrophe once and for all. According to the IEG, with the help of multinational corporations, billionaires, and other investors, the UN and IEG will rescue the planet from certain extermination. BRAAAYYYYYY
AFTER ALL, THE UN , A LAP DOG OF THE JEWISH DEEP STATE CONCEDED ONCE THAT ‘THE BUSINESSES OF THE WORLD IS NOW THE BUSINESS OF THE UN.
The call to make 30% of the globe into “Protected Areas” is really a colossal land grab as big as Europe’s colonial era, and it’ll bring as much suffering and death. Since when have Shylock Jews become so altruistic?
Let’s not be fooled by the hype from the conservation Jewish NGOs and their UN and government funders. This has nothing to do with climate change, protecting biodiversity or avoiding pandemics – in fact it’s more likely to make all of them worse.
It’s really all about money, land and resource control, and an all out assault on human diversity. This planned dispossession of hundreds of millions of people risks eradicating human diversity and self-sufficiency – the real keys to our being able to slow climate change and protect biodiversity.
The 30 x 30 target was incorporated in President Biden’s Executive Order on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad dated January 27, 2021, which includes at Sec. 219 “the goal of conserving at least 30 percent of our lands and waters by 2030.”
30 by 30 (or 30x30) is a worldwide initiative for governments to designate 30% of Earth's land and ocean area as protected areas by 2030.
A week after Joe Senile Biden became president, he signed an executive order that announced his commitment to protecting 30% of U.S. land and water — over 720 million acres — by 2030.
Real conservation doesn’t have room for commercial logging and grazing. These lands are not dedicated to the preservation of biodiversity but instead to extractive commodities
DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAPS DON’T WORK SAYS VADAKAYIL, THIS PLANET’S ONLY THINKER..
WALL STREET INVENTED A NEW TYPE OF CORPORATION TO HELP JEWISH ELITES BUY NATURE ITSELF..
VADAKAYIL KALKI ARMY IS RIGHT BEHIND YOU.. THE KOSHER GREASE BUCKET IS EMPTY..
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL..