judiciary is not guardian of the constitution— they have powers only to interpret the constitution and that too only when solicited by an aggrieved party , a law abiding indian citizen, not some foreign terrorist like ajmal kasab or some illegal immigrant rohingya muslim
on the ship when i have a doubt with any clause of some legal document like commercial charter party or imo laws of solas / marpol , i ask my wife to explain it to me.. because she understands english and she has no pre-conceived notions.. she cannot be fooled with chicanery of words like shall or should
i have penned max words about judiciary on the internet
https://captajitvadakayil.in/2022/10/22/consolidated-posts-on-indian-judiciary-capt-ajit-vadakayil/
when german jew rothschild left india in 1947 he ensured that the indian collegium judiciary will remain in the vice grip of a few traitor families— the parsis / peshawari khatri jews/ pashtun khan jews / kayasthas/ chitpavan jews/ tamil iyengar jews/ telugu kamma jews etc
when indira gandhi nationalised rothschild’s banks rothschild gt her murdered by khalistanis .. he tried to debar indira gandhi from contesting elections using judiciary first—it did not work.
our constitution protects law abiding indian citizens. not ltte terrorists from foreign nation sri lanka
ARTICLE 142 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION WAS NOT LAID DOWN FOR JUDGES TO PLAY DICTATOR OR GOD.
article 142 cannot be construed as powers enabling the collegium supreme court to assume the role of elected executive or elected legislature.
article 142 of constitution of india deals with enforcement of decrees and orders of the supreme court.
it states that the apex court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing “COMPLETE JUSTICE” in any case pending before it.
THIS IS AN INTERNAL JUDICIARY THINGY.. NOT A LICENSE FOR JUDICIARY TO PLAY GOD OR GIVE ORDERS TO PM OR RAP THE PRESIDENT’S KNUCKLES
from article 142, the supreme court does not derive overarching powers to perform the functions of executive and legislative in order to bring about complete justice.
in any case sec 142 is not a paramount law, if your intelligence is above that of a donkey
our judiciary does not have the cerebral wherewithal even to understand section 142.
the scum of the loser lawyer pool. the melords don’t even know the meaning of the term “ compete justice” mentioned in section 142
vadakayil declares “ i have not seen a single intelligent judge in india till today”
they don’t even know how to apply BODMAS to the constitution
the shadow moves the object against the laws of physics. not a single judge has the cerebral wherewithal to know what it a paramount law
so so so
THE STUPID JUDGES SAW IT FIT RELEASE AN INDIAN TRAITOR TERRORIST AG PERARIVALAN BY USING SEC 142.
THEN HEY PRESTO , MIRACLE
THEY THEN APPLY ILLEGAL STARE DECISIS TO FREE FOREIGN SRI LANKAN LTTE TERRORISTS – CHOO CHWEET APPAAAH..
https://captajitvadakayil.in/2022/02/23/aiadmk-dmk-misplaced-support-for-ltte-capt-ajit-vadakayil/
this bullshit has been happening for a long time..
nobody dares to point a finger at these stupid melords.. now we have a cji of suspect mind chandrachud blessing these useless judges
judges now do reckless judicial over reach using article 142 and “compete justice” bullshit
article 142 of the indian constitution deals with the enforcement of orders of the supreme court.
article 142 in the constitution of india 1949
142. enforcement of decrees and orders of supreme court and unless as to discovery, etc ( 1 ) the supreme court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it, and any decree so passed or orders so made shall be enforceable throughout the territory of india in such manner as may be prescribed by or under any law made by parliament and, until provision in that behalf is so made, in such manner as the president may by order prescribe
(2) subject to the provisions of any law made in this behalf by parliament, the supreme court shall, as respects the whole of the territory of india, have all and every power to make any order for the purpose of securing the attendance of any person, the discovery or production of any documents, or the investigation or punishment of any contempt of itself
article 142 does not provide supreme court any power to fill the statutory vacuum.
article 142 does nt give supreme court any power to create a system of check and balance and controls to the other branches of the government.
article 142 does not bestow any extraordinary powers of the supreme court in contradiction with statutory provisions violating the constitution
article 142(1) of the constitution empowers the supreme court to pass such order “as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it”. article 142 was draft article 118, and was adopted without debate by the constituent assembly on may 27, 1949.
article 142 was never brought into question or scrutiny. vadakayil puts an end to this bullshit today. only vadakayil has the cerebral wherewithal to do this
article 142 is not intended to satisfy circumstances which cannot be dealt with efficiently and adequately by current provisions of law
“COMPLETE JUSTICE “ UNDER ARTICLE 142 MERELY MEANS THAT “ THE BUCK STOPS HERE “..
LIKE ON MY SHIP I HAVE A GOLD PLATED BLOCK ON MY CAPTINS DESK “ THE BUCK STOPS HERE “.. READ THIS A ZILLION TIMES YOU CUNTS !
vadakayil says , the supreme court cannot use article 142 to violate fundamental rights of law abiding indian citizens
this does not mean that they can free foreign terrorist nationals who murdered rajiv gandhi.
the apex court has no powers to interfere with the internal and external security of the watan
article 142 read with articles such as 32 does not act as a passport for the supreme court to intervene in any matters based on melord’s whims and fancies and make decisions that are discretionary and subjective. india’s only thinkers vadakayil says so
article 142 is supplemented by article 32 and article 141 of the indian constitution.
article 32 in the constitution of india 1949
32. remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this part
(1) the right to move the supreme court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this part is guaranteed
(2) the supreme court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this part
(3) without prejudice to the powers conferred on the supreme court by clause ( 1 ) and ( 2 ), parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the supreme court under clause ( 2 )
(4) the right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this constitution
a supreme court judgment does not become the law of the land–read this line a zillion times
my left ball article 142 hands a unique, extraordinary power to our supreme court to do ‘complete justice’ in any matter
POWER CONFERRED ON THE SUPREME COURT, UNDER ARTICLE 142 TO DO “COMPLETE JUSTICE, NOT AVAILABLE TO HIGH COURTS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION..
BECAUSE AFTER SUPREME COURT THE CITIZEN HAS NOWHERE TO GO.. THIS IS THE MEANING OF “COMPLETE JUSTICE” – TO LEAVE NO UNTIED ENDS.
YOU CUNTS , SAVVY ??
this is not an unlimited license for supreme court judges to play god.
imagine justce dipak misra spake—supeme court is supreme .. like how ship’s chief cook is chief.. he is not the chief for ship captain.. he is just the chief of the other cooks working under him..
melord dipak misra is the asshole who will fly to delhi is a form has to be filled in capital. don’t make me say anything more..
article 142 of the indian constitution does not give wide discretionary subjective powers to the supreme court to pass any order to do ‘complete justice’ in any matter pending before it. this is total bullshit
‘complete justice’ is not one size fits all. . this changes from case to case based on context and time line
judicial activism is preferred at times but not to such an extent that it becomes a matter of extreme judicial overreach and adventurism using a bullshit clause of article 142
in the post below i explain the ridiculous case of locking ig valves with padlck and key.. the sea is full of donkeys.. this is why i never allowed my genius elder son to join the sea
or
check out this case of tying life raft to strong point which caused hundreds of thousands of deaths at sea
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/01/naive-sailor-sinking-ships-capt-ajit.html
under article 142, the supreme court can ask not order the law makers to create new laws on a subject where existing laws are incomplete.. constitution is a dynamic document and has to be amended regularly …
we are in the fast moving digital age.. we must be congruent with the times.. we cannot be in the grease and tackle age
the supreme court cannot puts itself “above the laws of parliament . nsa ajit doval has the powers to hang any judge if he is a foreign funded traitor
the power to exercise stupid “complete justice” under article 142 of the constitution does not include the power to ignore legislative provisions or pronouncements of law declared pursuant to article 141 of the constitution, and that this applies “even in exceptional cases”
vadakayil says – from now on the supreme court judges must be hauled over the coals if they play god using article 142 of the constitution.. when the executive and legislature is held responsible why not the judiciary?
142 (1) leads to the travesty of justice as judges don’t know the pulse of the people .
stupid judges don’t know that article 142 is only supplementary in nature and cannot supplant the statutory law. article 142 is an internal thingy for the dept of judiciary .. the idea is not for judges to play emperor and be fair and give people what they deserve like messiahs
judiciary has used the powers under 142 illegally for upholding citizens’ rights ( sic ) and implementing constitutional principles when the executive and legislature fails to do so ( who will decide this ? the brain dead melords ?
hey supreme court melords can you be made accountable for misuse of article 142, like the executive and legislature
pray?
prithee ?
our constitution is a dynamic document which needs to change with the need of hour.
the word treason is not mentioned in the indian constitution.. judges cannot go beyond the perimeter of the constitution
judges need to be circumspect and self-disciplined in the discharge of their judicial functions. they were the bottom dregs of the school cerebral barrel. none of them could get into iit or pass a simple iq test
“judicial activism” via illegal stare decisis and misuse of section 142 makes the apex court the most powerful mafia supreme court in the world.
stare decisis is not allowed .. it is illegal..
traitor indian judges have bled bharatmata again and again by illegal “stare decisis, past judgments sans context, attached to the addendum of the constitution – a langot tail.. this tail is now wagging the constitutional dog—ridiculous !
the time has come for "we the people" to declare --whatever laws have been created by judges via stare decisis and attached to the constitution like a langot ( addendum ) are all null and void ..
"stare decisis" is a deep state sponsored system where you build upon past lies … these stupid judgments were made on the system of “justice is blind sans context”..
past judgments made by "we are blind judges" -- is being used as the gospel--to judge future cases..
even a 12 year old class topper school boy can download the indian constitution and interpret it better than any judge in india
we all know that judges are unable to interpret the constitution as they dont have the brains to apply bodmas ..which a 12 year old class topper in school can..
the tail of stare decisis wags the constitutional dog..
we can use artificial intelligence to help out judges with BODMAS -- but not stare decisis .. the preponderence of laws in the constitution must be clearly laid out in a crystal "bodmas " style..... 1 + 5 x 6 - 3 + (4 - 2)...
ai can help in this task..
what part should you calculate first?.... what are the priorities…. “we the people “ are above the constitution..
today illegal collegium judges are in contempt of the constitution as well as “we the people”. .
the watan and dharma ( natural justice ) lies above the constitution and “we the people”.. calculate them ( prioritize ) in the wrong order, and you will get a wrong answer !...
the sun is to sustain life on earth, not to play monkey and snake shadow games… this is where “BODMAS” kicks in !...... this is pure math..
our unsuccessful lawyers turned collegium judges dont have the brains to prioritize...... b- brackets first.... o- orders (ie powers and square roots, etc.)..... dm- division and multiplication (left-to-right)..... as- addition and subtraction (left-to-right).. ....
the team headed by br ambedkar who compiled our constitution, did not have the cerebral wherewithal - nay- percepion-- to apply BODMAS ....
this has resulted in even foreign forces using trojan horse ngos ( via pil ) to hijack our constitution.. clever lawyers manipulated this to their advantage..
judges cannot make and break laws for the whole nation via pil route ( adultery/ homosexuality/ prostitution breaking culture, sabarimala womens entry ) , filed by foreign payroll desh drohis..
judges do not have the powers of judicial review of laws created ( example sec 370 ) by law makers.. there is no provision for “judicial review “ in the constitution.. these words just don’t exist ..
the supreme court is itself bound by the constitution of india and the parliament can amend the constitution any time they want.. the constitution...
constitution cannot be allowed the straitjacket the people/ watan/ dharma..
we ask pm modi to jail some desh drohi deep state controlled traitor collegium judges using military courts ..as an exemplary measure..
OUR JUDICIARY IS IN CONTEMPT OF WE THE PEOPLE..
the overstepping into the ambit of legislative and executive areas is called judicial overreach the aggravated form of the judicial activism .
judicial adventurism must be punished by nsa ajit doval, it is part of his job description and he is sworn to protect the watan from unelected and unaccountable collegium judges
under the indian constitution, the supreme court does not has the power to pass and enforce decrees for doing “complete justice” to law abiding indian society—even within the perimeter of the constitution.
the melords want to do “ complete justice” to foreign national ltte terrorists ? or for the matter foreign funded and pakistani isi controlled indian national traitors ? oh yeah? have they gone loco, punch drunk with power??
appidiyaahh ?
in the early 1990s, traitor indian judges bribed and honey trapped by the jewish deep state stepped in with greater frequency on matters ranging from malfeasance in governance to legislative matters to political and policy matters, leading to constant friction between three organs.
the melords took it upon themselves , unsolicited –like god . in the past few years, judicial activism has flourished in india supported by rothschild controlled/ owned main stream media . the best example of judicial activism is public interest litigation/ pil filed by ngos in the payroll of china and pakistan.
when gas leaked from union carbide in bhopal the stupid cunt judiciary did not even know what gas leaked.. they just fined
ucc gave us $470 million a pittance for killing 25,000 indians and permanently maiming 3 lakhs ( 300,000 indians )
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/06/mdi-diphenylmethane-diisocyanate-bhopal.html
in the case of union carbide corporation v. union of india or the bhopal gas leak case wherein the court ruled that limiting the powers of the court under article 142 would do severe damage ,,vadakayil says—my left ball
a stupid judge who did not know what is 5g finded jihi chawla 20,000 rupees
george soros got the entire us judiciary in his pocket from the lowest district attorneys to the highest echelons of the supreme court
german jew rothschild decides who the us supreme court judges will be
in the coal black allocations case supreme court called cbi a caged parrot. the supreme court judges that coal is a state mineral
CHOO CHWEET APPAH.
top lawyer harish salve had said he “squarely blamed” the supreme court of india for some of the problems ailing the indian economy.. when rajya sabha does not have the powers to interfere in economics why is the illegal collegium judiciary interfering ?
BRAAAYYYYYY.
during the covid era, supreme court unconstitutionally played god.. telling who should get oxygen and how much..
judiciary thinks diwali crackers caused smog in delhi.. these stupid judges who melord knickers are forever in a twist never heard of the term “temperature inversion”.. which judge in india ever had a technical mind?
unbridled judicial activism has led to judicial adventurism where judiciary transgressed to sacred legislature/ executive territory. it is time for nsa ajit doval to kick these useless judges who are in contempt of the constitution and we the people into jail..
all the judiciary can do is to interpret the constitution..but hey they rule india suo moto. darling of jewish deep state and liberal judge chandrachud refuses to look at congress tool kit case which is basically blatant treason to the watan. .
foreign funded traitor and jewish deep state agent, 22 year old indian disha ravi, ( masquerades as a climate activist ).. why was single mother disha ravi in contact with greta thunberg?. what happened to the sense of “circumstantial evidence”..
reckless justice is being slapped around suo moto on the basis of the personal whims and fancies of low mental caliber judges with non-technical minds .
mind you these judges are the bottom dregs of the school cerebral barrel and the loser dregs of the lawyer pool..
supreme court judge chandrachud unconstitutionally has given direct orders to pm modi to suppy delhi with extra 900 tonnes of oxygen depriving 12 other states causing hundreds of deaths
so so so –
what is suo moto cognisance?..
in law, suo motu ( latin term for -"on its own motion") describes an act of authority taken without formal prompting from an aggrieved party.
in simple terms, it means taking total control over a matter like the captain of a ship at sea. suo moto cognizance is when the courts take it upon themselves to interfere in any mann ke tamanna matter , sometimes at the behest of india’s external enemies or foreign funded traitor ngos..
this is unconstitutional judicial tyranny or the dictatorship rule of the unelected and unaccountable.. judicial adventurism vide suo fuckin’ moto clause is an overreach into the executive domain , a blatant intrusion into the proper working of democracy.
the concept of pil or suo moto cognizance reflects the unconstitutional judicial adventurism nay tyranny of unelected and unaccountable collegium judiciary
suo moto’s actions by indian courts are a reflection of extreme judicial adventurism in contempt of the constitution/ we the people / the watan / dharma..
judicial adventurism using suo moto bullshit severely weakens the legistature and elected executive who are expected to perform by themselves without any prodding by the mentally inferior and unaccountable/ unelected judges..
the adoption of such an all powerful messiah moses nay yhvh god attitude by the judiciary does not augur well for a healthy democracy. the reckless use of the power of contempt by judiciary is unconstitutional and uncalled for.
“the naked truth is that the traitor judiciary , has it nose knotted into their own twisted stinking undies , ridiculously struck with its own image of authority and hijacked truth- backed by the jewish deep state and pakistani isi..
the primary function of the judiciary is to interpret the laws but rather than interpreting them, they start doing the work of legislature i.e. making the laws, issuing guidelines and direction.
judicial overreach kills the separation of powers on which the democracy is based.. extreme judicial activism nay adventurism is based on political and personal prudence nay whims nay leftist commie political leanings of the judges
courts are not only considering questions of law, but have started to deliberate on policy questions with wide-ranging impact (like; should aadhaar be linked with social media accounts?) just who the hell are these mentally inferior judges can they pass a simple iq test?
we the peope who are above the constition don’t want stupid judges to provide ‘checks and balance’.
in case of judicial adventurism, court’s often follow a populist impulse
in the ‘n. godavarman versus union of india’ case, the supreme court defined a ‘forest’ in the absence of a definition in the forest act and, in doing so; it took over the governance of the forests in india.. these ignoantjudges have no idea of what is ecology
stupid judges are even interfering in national anthem
judges are interfering in bollywood movie censorship.. and chandrachud melord says that sexuality of a woman does not belong to her husband ( his mother and wife are excluded )
and hey judiciary wants to save taj mahal.. baaki log saab chotiya.. supreme court ekdum chenga
we cant even widen a road by cutting trees due to these uppity melords
the constitution of india distributed powers between the three organs like elected legislative, elected executive and unelected/ unaccountable to the people collegium judiciary in an implied manner. one organ should not interfere with other organs.
pils filed by m.c. mehta led to delhi’s urban transformation. this also resulted in large-scale deindustrialization of the city, as “green judges" ordered the relocation of 168 large industries, rendering thousands jobless.
delhi’s vehicular pollution case led to the conversion of all public transport vehicles to cng from diesel or petrol, resulting in a sudden drop in public transport supply and an increase in private vehicles.
these stupid judges never heard of intrasetial lung diseases caused by nano carbon from lpg exausts
sc ruling on pil which banned the sale of liquor at retail outlets within 500m of any state/national highway.
for state governments, this led to massive loss in revenue collection. it resulted in loss of business for hotels and restaurants. it indirectly resulted in thousands loss of jobs for enterprises in the supply chain.
judicial overreach has caused a disproportionately large financial burden on state exchequer as well pressure on judiciary that amounts to pendency of cases later.
procedural supremacy has suffered, and this creates doubts over the competence of our courts in assessing policy interventions.
the ‘kesavananda bharti vs. state of kerala’ case that amendments which tend to affect the 'basic structure of the constitution' are subject to judicial review. just who the hell are the collegium judges to do judicial review. the elected lawmakers can amend the constitution anytime theyr want to move with the times
the twenty-fourth amendment of the constitution of india, officially known as the constitution (twenty-fourth amendment) act, 1971, enables parliament to dilute fundamental rights through amendments of the constitution.
privacy is not a fundamental right
musim women in burqa were caught cheating in exams with blue tooth ear pieces
the doctrine of separation of powers is not codified in the constitution.. we don’t want the unelected/ unaccountable collegium judiciary to decide and set guidelines..
democracy is a form of government where people surrender some of their rights to a small elite body who are elected by people to rule over themselves. this elite body or the public representatives make law for the betterment of people.
once elected the public representatives remain all powerful till the end of the term by constitutional provision or otherwise because the constitution does not provide “right to recall ” power to the people.
the judiciary by principle cannot act unless an aggrieved party repeat an aggrieved does not knock its door.
imagine a non-aggrieved muslim lawyer filed a pil and supreme court allowed menstruating age women into sabarimala, decimating a sacred 5900 year old culture
the theory of “power vacuum filling” must not involve the useless judiciary
we the people do not want the judiciary to crack the whip and rap the knuckles of the elected pm. judiciary has weakened the subjective powers of the president and state governors which is unconstitutional and illegal
imagine even ncw started to summon law ministers and rap their knuckles with conivance of the edia controled by jew rothschild. tee heee ..this takes the cake.
we don’t want judiciary to pander to social wants of commie traitors.. BRAAAAYYYY.
supreme court illegally ruled that no constitutional amendments can be made on the part iii of the constitution and there by fundamental rights cannot be abridged by the legislature. by this pronouncement the supreme court has retraced its own judgment in shankari prasad case and sajjan singh vs. state of rajasthan case that the fundamental rights can be amended.
the government in the 24th amendment amended article 368 empowering the legislature the power to amend the constitution.
in the keshavananda bharti vs. the state of kerala judgment supreme court first kicked the hornet’s nest in the name of the basic structure of constitution.
in this case the golaknath case was over ruled and parliament regained the power of amending but supreme court explicitly said that the legislature by virtue of the amending power cannot change the basic structure of the constitution. but what constitutes the basic structure was not specified. th melords got conphujjed
to remove the constitutional hurdles in an amendment the government inserted clause 4 and 5 in the article 368 which mentions that limited power of amendment is a basic structure of constitution.
in the minnerva mills vs. the union of india and other states--- in this case the supreme court illegally over ruled that amending power is a basic structure of constitution.
in this case supreme court reinterpreted the writ of habeas corpus as not only producing a person in the court but also preventing a person jailed from the inhuman treatment in the prison. no wonder ajmal kasab wanted steaming mutton biriyani , beef paaya and attar on his balls
we the people will have law makers hegemony—not illegal collegium judiciary hegemony
pm and law minister are napunsaks of the first order.. they allow pea brained judges to play god.. in their watch supreme court struck down njac, which was passed with 100% unanimity in both lok / rajya sabha-- and signed by the president..
vadakayil declares , njac still stands.. the judicial review striking down njac act is null and void.. our traitor judiciary created the naxal red corridor , causes ethnic cleansing of kashmiri pandits and khalistanis to grab the ancient ancestral lands of punjabi hindus.
judiciary has no powers to stop elected executive from following the rule of dharma..
many indian journalists , collegium judges , professors of social sciences in elite indian colleges are in deep state payroll…
THE WHITE JEW KNOWS THAN IN 10 YEARS INDIA WILL BE THIS PLANETS NO 1 SUPERPOWER AND IT PLANS TO MAKE INDIA IMPLODE FROM WITHIN..
judiciary has no powers to interfere in bharatmatas internal and external security.. the word traitor is not found in the constitution..
there is concern among the public about lack of transparency in collegium judicial appointments .
OUR LAW MINISTER RIJIJU KEEPS MOANING ..
there is increasing unease because of a lack of a credible mechanism to deal with serious complaints against the higher judiciary.
senior high court judge karnan was jailed for being a whistle blower against corruption and foreign bribes in judiciary
and cji khehar with pale eyes , wanted foreign adl lawyer firms in india
our supreme court bar association was funded by the jewish deep state
because of illegal stare decisis , instead of penning a simple clear judgement , dimwit pompous judges scrounge from internet to make the judgement look flowery ( apun bhi intellectual ) even quoting mad jew sigmund freud. hey this is judicial romanticism.. tee heeee
indian judges have started craving for the limelight
brain dead judges must never ever get into areas in which they have zilch expertise. the court, for instance, can ask not order order the government to prepare a welfare scheme, but not undertake the task of framing it itself.
vadakayil asks modi/ ajit doval - form nia/ nsa court in every district in india, to deal with traitors and illegal immigrants.. we don’t want wokeism in judiciary.. these courts must punish traitor judges in foreign payroll who take frequent foreign jaunts
stop this kindergarten school type vacations of these judges..
collegium judiciary has illegally curtailed fundamental rights like article 21 and 19 of the constitution by making new laws which did not exists prior and changing the substantive law.
we the people will not permits collegium judiciary to encroach upon the field of the other two organs by assuming law making powers. there is a significant difference that exists between creating law protecting the fundamental rights of citizens
judiciary has never been granted subjective powers .. only president, pm , nsa and state governors have subjective powers
supreme court cannot use statutory interpretation to bring in new laws under article 142 to cover the gaps in the statute discarding doctrine of separation of powers and make it viable when the elected and accountable legislature has expressly chose not to enact any provision regarding the same.
article 141 of the constitution of india stipulates that the law declared by the supreme court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of india—not on the law makers
repeated unwarranted interventions of courts can diminish the faith of the people in the integrity, quality, and efficiency of the popular elected government.
the powers under article 142 being curative in nature internally for the judiciary , it cannot be construed as powers which authorise the court to assume the role of executive or legislature.
WE DON’T WANT COLLEGIUM JUDGES TO SAVE INDIA..
judicial activism is unwarranted.
when it metamorphoses to judicial adventurism, the job of nsa ajit doval is to put these errant uppity judges in jail, and if they are foreign funded hang them as traitors to the watan
OUR JUDICIARY IS IN CONTEMPT OF WE THE PEOPLE.. WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION
TO BE CONTINUED
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
CHADRACHUD
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL STATE ADVOCATE GENERALS
CJ OF AL HIGH COURTS STATE
LAW MINISTER RIJIJU
LAW MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATES
PM
PMO
MEA
JAISHANKAR
AJIT DOVAL
RAW
IB
NIA
AMIT SHAH
HOME MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATES
DIPALI OJHA
BAR ASSOCIATIONS