Quantcast
Channel: Ajit Vadakayil
Viewing all 852 articles
Browse latest View live

INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE BY THEODORE KACZYNSKI – CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

$
0
0



  1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED--

    CAPTAIN, HOW DID ROTHSCHILD BRAINWASH GANDHI?

    WELL-

    GANDHI WAS BRAINWASHED WHEN HE WAS AT TOLSTOY FARM BY GERMAN JEW AND HUMPING GAY HERMANN KALLENCBACK..

    BOTH SHARED THE SAME ROOM AND BED, AFTER GANDHI KICKED OUT WIFE KASTURBA , QUOTING "BRAHMACHARYA"..

    THE METHOD CHOSEN WAS "HIJACKING THE MOOLADHARA CHAKRA"..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/01/mahatma-gandhi-and-his-endless.html

    MY REVELATION NOW JUMPS TO 60.13 %

    YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH EVIL THERE IS ON THIS PLANET..

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhunt:_Unabomber

    TED KACZYNSKI WAS A GENIUS..

    AT HARVARD HIS PROFESSOR MURRAY WHOM HE TRUSTED, IMMORALLY LENT HIM TO MK ULTRA BRAINWASH BY FBI..

    THIS FLIPPED HIS MIND AND BE BECAME A SERIAL KILLER ..
    MK STANDS FOR THE INITIALS OF GANDHI AND KING..

    BOTH WERE BRAINWASHED IN AS MUCH AS THEY WERE ABLE TO CONVINCE MILLIONS OF BROWN/ BLACK PEOPLE-- THAT IT IS OK TO BE NON-VIOLENT WHEN THE WHITE MAN SHITS ON YOUR FACE , RAPES YOUR DAUGHTERS, AND STEALS YOUR MONEY..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/07/martin-luther-king-jr-had-125-white.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-diabolical-brain-washing-process-of.html

    EVER HEARD OF TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE?

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/09/tavistock-institute-creating-herd.html

    RED WAS A NICE , INTELLIGENT, LEVEL HEADED, LOVING AND COMPASSIONATE YOUNG MAN. SEE HIS PHOTO..

    HIS STORY IS FUDGED TO PROTECT THE REPUTATION OF ROTHSCHILDs IVY LEAGUE UNIVERSITY HARVARD.

    https://www.history.com/news/what-happened-to-the-unabomber-at-harvard

    TED IS IN JAIL --HE WILL BE THERE TILL HE DIES..

    THIS RAISES THE QUESTION-- WHO FLIPPED HIS SENSITIVE GENIUS MIND ?

    TED WAS A REAL GENIUS--WITH AN IQ OF MORE THAN 168.

    INSTEAD WE WORSHIP A MEDIOCRE GERMAN JEW NAMED ALBERT EINSTEIN, AN AGENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/albert-einstein-was-thief-plagiarist.html

    TODAY KOSHER EVIL PHARMA KILLS MORE PEOPLE THAN ANYBODY ELSE..

    EVEN PUTIN DOES NOT KNOW THAT LEO TOLSTOY WAS A GERMAN JEW, A BRAINWASHING EXERT.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/german-jew-leo-tolstoy-who-fanned-dying.htm

    WE LIVE IN A WORLD FULL OF LIES.   ONLY THIS BLOGSITE ATTEMPTS TO EXHUME LONG BURIED TRUTHS.

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..


Industrial Society and Its Future Theodore Kaczynski 1995



INTRODUCTION 1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human being to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries. 2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy. 3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later. 4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society. 5. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM 6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general. 7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.) 8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th centuries. 9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization”. Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential. FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY 10. By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, 1 etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism. 11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms “negro”, “oriental”, “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy”, “dude” or “fellow”. The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion”. Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the word “primitive” by “nonliterate”. They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hyper sensitivity of leftish anthropologists.) 12. Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghettodweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families. 13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.) 14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. 15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful. 16. Words like “self-confidence”, “self-reliance”, “initiative”, “enterprise”, “optimism”, etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is antiindividualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve every one’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagohistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser. 17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment. 18. Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly. 19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he 2 cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself. 20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait. 21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred. 22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss. 23. We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. It is only a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism. OVERSOCIALIZATION 24. Psychologists use the term “socialization” to designate the process by which children are trained to think and act as society demands. A person is said to be well socialized if he believes in and obeys the moral code of his society and fits in well as a functioning part of that society. It may seem senseless to say that many leftists are over-socialized, since the leftist is perceived as a rebel. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. Many leftists are not such rebels as they seem. 25. The moral code of our society is so demanding that no one can think, feel and act in a completely moral way. For example, we are not supposed to hate anyone, yet almost everyone hates somebody at some time or other, whether he admits it to himself or not. Some people are so highly socialized that the attempt to think, feel and act morally imposes a severe burden on them. In order to avoid feelings of guilt, they continually have to deceive themselves about their own motives and find moral explanations for feelings and actions that in reality have a nonmoral origin. We use the term “oversocialized” to describe such people. [2] 26. Oversocialization can lead to low self-esteem, a sense of powerlessness, defeatism, guilt, etc. One of the most important means by which our society socializes children is by making them feel ashamed of behavior or speech that is contrary to society’s expectations. If this is overdone, or if a particular child is especially susceptible to such feelings, he ends by feeling ashamed of HIMSELF. Moreover the thought and the behavior of the oversocialized person are more restricted by society’s expectations than are those of the lightly socialized person. The majority of people engage in a significant amount of naughty behavior. They lie, they commit petty thefts, they break traffic laws, they goof off at work, they hate someone, they say spiteful things or they use some underhanded trick to get ahead of the other guy. The oversocialized person cannot do these things, or if he does do them he generates in himself a sense of shame and self-hatred. The oversocialized person cannot even experience, without guilt, thoughts or feelings that are contrary to the accepted morality; he cannot think “unclean” thoughts. And socialization is not just a matter of morality; we are socialized to conform to many norms of behavior that do not fall under the heading of morality. Thus the oversocialized person is kept on a psychological leash and spends his life running on rails that society has laid down for him. In many oversocialized people this results in a sense of constraint and powerlessness that can be a severe hardship. We suggest that oversocialization is among the more serious cruelties that human being inflict on one another. 27. We argue that a very important and influential segment of the modern left is oversocialized and that their oversocialization is of great importance in determining the direction of modern leftism. Leftists of the oversocialized type tend to be intellectuals or members of the upper-middle class. Notice that university intellectuals [3] constitute the most highly socialized segment of our society and also the most leftwing segment. 28. The leftist of the oversocialized type tries to get off his psychological leash and assert his autonomy by rebelling. But usually he is not strong enough to rebel against the most basic values of society. Generally speaking, the goals of today’s leftists are NOT in conflict with the accepted morality. On the contrary, the left takes an accepted moral principle, adopts it as its own, and then accuses mainstream society of violating that principle. Examples: racial equality, equality of the sexes, helping poor people, peace as opposed to war, nonviolence generally, freedom of expression, kindness to animals. More fundamentally, the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. All these have been deeply rooted values of our society (or at least of its middle and upper classes [4] for a long time. These values are explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material presented to us by the mainstream communications media and the educational system. Lef3 tists, especially those of the oversocialized type, usually do not rebel against these principles but justify their hostility to society by claiming (with some degree of truth) that society is not living up to these principles. 29. Here is an illustration of the way in which the oversocialized leftist shows his real attachment to the conventional attitudes of our society while pretending to be in rebellion aginst it. Many leftists push for affirmative action, for moving black people into high-prestige jobs, for improved education in black schools and more money for such schools; the way of life of the black “underclass” they regard as a social disgrace. They want to integrate the black man into the system, make him a business executive, a lawyer, a scientist just like upper-middle-class white people. The leftists will reply that the last thing they want is to make the black man into a copy of the white man; instead, they want to preserve African American culture. But in what does this preservation of African American culture consist? It can hardly consist in anything more than eating black-style food, listening to black-style music, wearing black-style clothing and going to a black-style church or mosque. In other words, it can express itself only in superficial matters. In all ESSENTIAL respects most leftists of the oversocialized type want to make the black man conform to white, middle-class ideals. They want to make him study technical subjects, become an executive or a scientist, spend his life climbing the status ladder to prove that black people are as good as white. They want to make black fathers “responsible,” they want black gangs to become nonviolent, etc. But these are exactly the values of the industrial- technological system. The system couldn’t care less what kind of music a man listens to, what kind of clothes he wears or what religion he believes in as long as he studies in school, holds a respectable job, climbs the status ladder, is a “responsible” parent, is nonviolent and so forth. In effect, however much he may deny it, the oversocialized leftist wants to integrate the black man into the system and make him adopt its values. 30. We certainly do not claim that leftists, even of the oversocialized type, NEVER rebel against the fundamental values of our society. Clearly they sometimes do. Some oversocialized leftists have gone so far as to rebel against one of modern society’s most important principles by engaging in physical violence. By their own account, violence is for them a form of “liberation.” In other words, by committing violence they break through the psychological restraints that have been trained into them. Because they are oversocialized these restraints have been more confining for them than for others; hence their need to break free of them. But they usually justify their rebellion in terms of mainstream values. If they engage in violence they claim to be fighting against racism or the like. 31. We realize that many objections could be raised to the foregoing thumbnail sketch of leftist psychology. The real situation is complex, and anything like a complete description of it would take several volumes even if the necessary data were available. We claim only to have indicated very roughly the two most important tendencies in the psychology of modern leftism. 32. The problems of the leftist are indicative of the problems of our society as a whole. Low self-esteem, depressive tendencies and defeatism are not restricted to the left. Though they are especially noticeable in the left, they are widespread in our society. And today’s society tries to socialize us to a greater extent than any previous society. We are even told by experts how to eat, how to exercise, how to make love, how to raise our kids and so forth. THE POWER PROCESS 33. Human beings have a need (probably based in biology) for something that we will call the power process. This is closely related to the need for power (which is widely recognized) but is not quite the same thing. The power process has four elements. The three most clearcut of these we call goal, effort and attainment of goal. (Everyone needs to have goals whose attainment requires effort, and needs to succeed in attaining at least some of his goals.) The fourth element is more difficult to define and may not be necessary for everyone. We call it autonomy and will discuss it later (paragraphs 42-44). 34. Consider the hypothetical case of a man who can have anything he wants just by wishing for it. Such a man has power, but he will develop serious psychological problems. At first he will have a lot of fun, but by and by he will become acutely bored and demoralized. Eventually he may become clinically depressed. History shows that leisured aristocracies tend to become decadent. This is not true of fighting aristocracies that have to struggle to maintain their power. But leisured, secure aristocracies that have no need to exert themselves usually become bored, hedonistic and demoralized, even though they have power. This shows that power is not enough. One must have goals toward which to exercise one’s power. 35. Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization. 36. Nonattainment of important goals results in death if the goals are physical necessities, and in frustration if non-attainment of the goals is compatible with survival. Consistent failure to attain goals throughout life results in defeatism, low self-esteem or depression. 37. Thus, in order to avoid serious psychological problems, a human being needs goals whose attainment requires effort, and he must have a reasonable rate of success in attaining his goals. SURROGATE ACTIVITIES 38. But not every leisured aristocrat becomes bored and demoralized. For example, the emperor Hirohito, instead of sinking into decadent hedonism, devoted himself to marine biology, a field in which he became distinguished. When people do not have to exert themselves to satisfy 4 their physical needs they often set up artificial goals for themselves. In many cases they then pursue these goals with the same energy and emotional involvement that they otherwise would have put into the search for physical necessities. Thus the aristocrats of the Roman Empire had their literary pretensions; many European aristocrats a few centuries ago invested tremendous time and energy in hunting, though they certainly didn’t need the meat; other aristocracies have competed for status through elaborate displays of wealth; and a few aristocrats, like Hirohito, have turned to science. 39. We use the term “surrogate activity” to designate an activity that is directed toward an artificial goal that people set up for themselves merely in order to have some goal to work toward, or let us say, merely for the qake of the “fulfillment” that they get from pursuing the goal. Here is a rule of thumb for the identification of surrogate activities. Given a person who devotes much time and energy to the pursuit of goal X, ask yourself this: If he had to devote most of his time and energy to satisfying his biological needs, and if that effort required him to use his physical and mental faculties in a varied and interesting way, would he feel seriously deprived because he did not attain goal X? If the answer is no, then the person’s pursuit of goal X is a surrogate activity. Hirohito’s studies in marine biology clearly constituted a surrogate activity, since it is pretty certain that if Hirohito had had to spend his time working at interesting non-scientific tasks in order to obtain the necessities of life, he would not have felt deprived because he didn’t know all about the anatomy and life-cycles of marine animals. On the other hand the pursuit of sex and love (for example) is not a surrogate activity, because most people, even if their existence were otherwise satisfactory, would feel deprived if they passed their lives without ever having a relationship with a member of the opposite sex. (But pursuit of an excessive amount of sex, more than one really needs, can be a surrogate activity.) 40. In modern industrial society only minimal effort is necessary to satisfy one’s physical needs. It is enough to go through a training program to acquire some petty technical skill, then come to work on time and exert the very modest effort needed to hold a job. The only requirements are a moderate amount of intelligence and, most of all, simple OBEDIENCE. If one has those, society takes care of one from cradle to grave. (Yes, there is an underclass that cannot take the physical necessities for granted, but we are speaking here of mainstream society.) Thus it is not surprising that modern society is full of surrogate activities. These include scientific work, athletic achievement, humanitarian work, artistic and literary creation, climbing the corporate ladder, acquisition of money and material goods far beyond the point at which they cease to give any additional physical satisfaction, and social activism when it addresses issues that are not important for the activist personally, as in the case of white activists who work for the rights of nonwhite minorities. These are not always PURE surrogate activities, since for many people they may be motivated in part by needs other than the need to have some goal to pursue. Scientific work may be motivated in part by a drive for prestige, artistic creation by a need to express feelings, militant social activism by hostility. But for most people who pursue them, these activities are in large part surrogate activities. For example, the majority of scientists will probably agree that the “fulfillment” they get from their work is more important than the money and prestige they earn. 41. For many if not most people, surrogate activities are less satisfying than the pursuit of real goals (that is, goals that people would want to attain even if their need for the power process were already fulfilled). One indication of this is the fact that, in many or most cases, people who are deeply involved in surrogate activities are never satisfied, never at rest. Thus the money-maker constantly strives for more and more wealth. The scientist no sooner solves one problem than he moves on to the next. The long-distance runner drives himself to run always farther and faster. Many people who pursue surrogate activities will say that they get far more fulfillment from these activities than they do from the “mundane” business of satisfying their biological needs, but that is because in our society the effort needed to satisfy the biological needs has been reduced to triviality. More importantly, in our society people do not satisfy their biological needs AUTONOMOUSLY but by functioning as parts of an immense social machine. In contrast, people generally have a great deal of autonomy in pursuing their surrogate activities. AUTONOMY 42. Autonomy as a part of the power process may not be necessary for every individual. But most people need a greater or lesser degree of autonomy in working toward their goals. Their efforts must be undertaken on their own initiative and must be under their own direction and control. Yet most people do not have to exert this initiative, direction and control as single individuals. It is usually enough to act as a member of a SMALL group. Thus if half a dozen people discuss a goal among themselves and make a successful joint effort to attain that goal, their need for the power process will be served. But if they work under rigid orders handed down from above that leave them no room for autonomous decision and initiative, then their need for the power process will not be served. The same is true when decisions are made on a collective basis if the group making the collective decision is so large that the role of each individual is insignificant. [5] 43. It is true that some individuals seem to have little need for autonomy. Either their drive for power is weak or they satisfy it by identifying themselves with some powerful organization to which they belong. And then there are unthinking, animal types who seem to be satisfied with a purely physical sense of power (the good combat soldier, who gets his sense of power by developing fighting skills that he is quite content to use in blind obedience to his superiors). 5 44. But for most people it is through the power process — having a goal, making an AUTONOMOUS effort and attaining the goal — that self-esteem, self-confidence and a sense of power are acquired. When one does not have adequate opportunity to go through the power process the consequences are (depending on the individual and on the way the power process is disrupted) boredom, demoralization, low self-esteem, inferiority feelings, defeatism, depression, anxiety, guilt, frustration, hostility, spouse or child abuse, insatiable hedonism, abnormal sexual behavior, sleep disorders, eating disorders. etc. [6] SOURCES OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS 45. Any of the foregoing symptoms can occur in any society, but in modern industrial society they are present on a massive scale. We aren’t the first to mention that the world today seems to be going crazy. This sort of thing is not normal for human societies. There is good reason to believe that primitive man suffered from less stress and frustration and was better satisfied with his way of life than modern man is. It is true that not all was sweetness and light in primitive societies. Abuse of women was common among the Australian aborigines, transexuality was fairly common among some of the American Indian tribes. But it does appear that GENERALLY SPEAKING the kinds of problems that we have listed in the preceding paragraph were far less common among primitive peoples than they are in modern society. 46. We attribute the social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that that society requires people to live under conditions radically different from those under which the human race evolved and to behave in ways that conflict with the patterns of behavior that the human race developed while living under the earlier conditions. It is clear from what we have already written that we consider lack of opportunity to properly experience the power process as the most important of the abnormal conditions to which modern society subjects people. But it is not the only one. Before dealing with disruption of the power process as a source of social problems we will discuss some of the other sources. 47. Among the abnormal conditions present in modern industrial society are excessive density of population, isolation of man from nature, excessive rapidity of social change and the breakdown of natural small-scale communities such as the extended family, the village or the tribe. 48. It is well known that crowding increases stress and aggression. The degree of crowding that exists today and the isolation of man from nature are consequences of technological progress. All pre-industrial societies were predominantly rural. The Industrial Revolution vastly increased the size of cities and the proportion of the population that lives in them, and modern agricultural technology has made it possible for the Earth to support a far denser population than it ever did before. (Also, technology exacerbates the effects of crowding because it puts increased disruptive powers in people’s hands. For example, a variety of noise-making devices: power mowers, radios, motorcycles, etc. If the use of these devices is unrestricted, people who want peace and quiet are frustrated by the noise. If their use is restricted, people who use the devices are frustrated by the regulations. But if these machines had never been invented there would have been no conflict and no frustration generated by them.) 49. For primitive societies the natural world (which usually changes only slowly) provided a stable framework and therefore a sense of security. In the modern world it is human society that dominates nature rather than the other way around, and modern society changes very rapidly owing to technological change. Thus there is no stable framework. 50. The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can’t make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values. 51. The breakdown of traditional values to some extent implies the breakdown of the bonds that hold together traditional small-scale social groups. The disintegration of small-scale social groups is also promoted by the fact that modern conditions often require or tempt individuals to move to new locations, separating themselves from their communities. Beyond that, a technological society HAS TO weaken family ties and local communities if it is to function efficiently. In modern society an individual’s loyalty must be first to the system and only secondarily to a smallscale community, because if the internal loyalties of small-scale communities were stronger than loyalty to the system, such communities would pursue their own advantage at the expense of the system. 52. Suppose that a public official or a corporation executive appoints his cousin, his friend or his co-religionist to a position rather than appointing the person best qualified for the job. He has permitted personal loyalty to supersede his loyalty to the system, and that is “nepotism” or “discrimination,” both of which are terrible sins in modern society. Would-be industrial societies that have done a poor job of subordinating personal or local loyalties to loyalty to the system are usually very inefficient. (Look at Latin America.) Thus an advanced industrial society can tolerate only those small-scale communities that are emasculated, tamed and made into tools of the system. [7] 53. Crowding, rapid change and the breakdown of communities have been widely recognized as sources of social problems. But we do not believe tbey are enough to account for the extent of the problems that are seen today. 54. A few pre-industrial cities were very large and crowded, yet their inhabitants do not seem to have suffered from psychological problems to the same extent as modern man. In America today there still are uncrowded rural areas, and we find there the same problems as in urban areas, though the problems tend to be less acute in the rural areas. Thus crowding does not seem to be the decisive factor. 6 55. On the growing edge of the American frontier during the 19th century, the mobility of the population probably broke down extended families and small-scale social groups to at least the same extent as these are broken down today. In fact, many nuclear families lived by choice in such isolation, having no neighbors within several miles, that they belonged to no community at all, yet they do not seem to have developed problems as a result. 56. Furthermore, change in American frontier society was very rapid and deep. A man might be born and raised in a log cabin, outside the reach of law and order and fed largely on wild meat; and by the time he arrived at old age he might be working at a regular job and living in an ordered community with effective law enforcement. This was a deeper change than that which typically occurs in the life of a modern individual, yet it does not seem to have led to psychological problems. In fact, 19th century American society had an optimistic and self-confident tone, quite unlike that of today’s society. [8] 57. The difference, we argue, is that modern man has the sense (largely justified) that change is IMPOSED on him, whereas the 19th century frontiersman had the sense (also largely justified) that he created change himself, by his own choice. Thus a pioneer settled on a piece of land of his own choosing and made it into a farm through his own effort. In those days an entire county might have only a couple of hundred inhabitants and was a far more isolated and autonomous entity than a modern county is. Hence the pioneer farmer participated as a member of a relatively small group in the creation of a new, ordered community. One may well question whether the creation of this community was an improvement, but at any rate it satisfied the pioneer’s need for the power process. 58. It would be possible to give other examples of societies in which there has been rapid change and/or lack of close community ties without the kind of massive behavioral aberration that is seen in today’s industrial society. We contend that the most important cause of social and psychological problems in modern society is the fact that people have insufficient opportunity to go through the power process in a normal way. We don’t mean to say that modern society is the only one in which the power process has been disrupted. Probably most if not all civilized societies have interfered with the power process to a greater or lesser extent. But in modern industrial society the problem has become particularly acute. Leftism, at least in its recent (mid- to late-20th century) form, is in part a symptom of deprivation with respect to the power process. DISRUPTION OF THE POWER PROCESS IN MODERN SOCIETY 59. We divide human drives into three groups: (1) those drives that can be satisfied with minimal effort; (2) those that can be satisfied but only at the cost of serious effort; (3) those that cannot be adequately satisfied no matter how much effort one makes. The power process is the process of satisfying the drives of the second group. The more drives there are in the third group, the more there is frustration, anger, eventually defeatism, depression, etc. 60. In modern industrial society natural human drives tend to be pushed into the first and third groups, and the second group tends to consist increasingly of artificially created drives. 61. In primitive societies, physical necessities generally fall into group 2: They can be obtained, but only at the cost of serious effort. But modern society tends to guaranty the physical necessities to everyone [9] in exchange for only minimal effort, hence physical needs are pushed into group 1. (There may be disagreement about whether the effort needed to hold a job is “minimal”; but usually, in lower- to middle-level jobs, whatever effort is required is merely that of OBEDIENCE. You sit or stand where you are told to sit or stand and do what you are told to do in the way you are told to do it. Seldom do you have to exert yourself seriously, and in any case you have hardly any autonomy in work, so that the need for the power process is not well served.) 62. Social needs, such as sex, love and status, often remain in group 2 in modern society, depending on the situation of the individual. [10] But, except for people who have a particularly strong drive for status, the effort required to fulfill the social drives is insufficient to satisfy adequately the need for the power process. 63. So certain artificial needs have been created that fall into group 2, hence serve the need for the power process. Advertising and marketing techniques have been developed that make many people feel they need things that their grandparents never desired or even dreamed of. It requires serious effort to earn enough money to satisfy these artificial needs, hence they fall into group 2. (But see paragraphs 80-82.) Modern man must satisfy his need for the power process largely through pursuit of the artificial needs created by the advertising and marketing industry [11], and through surrogate activities. 64. It seems that for many people, maybe the majority, these artificial forms of the power process are insufficient. A theme that appears repeatediy in the writings of the social critics of the second half of the 20th century is the sense of purposelessness that afflicts many people in modern society. (This purposelessness is often called by other names such as “anomic” or “middle-class vacuity.”) We suggest that the so-called “identity crisis” is actually a search for a sense of purpose, often for commitment to a suitable surrogate activity. It may be that existentialism is in large part a response to the purposelessness of modern life. [12] Very widespread in modern society is the search for “fulfillment.” But we think that for the majority of people an activity whose main goal is fulfillment (that is, a surrogate activity) does not bring completely satisfactory fulfillment. In other words, it does not fully satisfy the need for the power process. (See paragraph 41.) That need can be fully satisfied only through activities that have some external goal, such as physical necessities, sex, love, status, revenge, etc. 65. Moreover, where goals are pursued through earning money, climbing the status ladder or functioning as part of the system in some other way, most people are not in a po7 sition to pursue their goals AUTONOMOUSLY. Most workers are someone else’s employee and, as we pointed out in paragraph 61, must spend their days doing what they are told to do in the way they are told to do it. Even most people who are in business for themselves have only limited autonomy. It is a chronic complaint of small-business persons and entrepreneurs that their hands are tied by excessive government regulation. Some of these regulations are doubtless unnecessary, but for the most part government regulations are essential and inevitable parts of our extremely complex society. A large portion of small business today operates on the franchise system. It was reported in the Wall Street Journal a few years ago that many of the franchise-granting companies require applicants for franchises to take a personality test that is designed to EXCLUDE those who have creativity and initiative, because such persons are not sufficiently docile to go along obediently with the franchise system. This excludes from small business many of the people who most need autonomy. 66. Today people live more by virtue of what the system does FOR them or TO them than by virtue of what they do for themselves. And what they do for themselves is done more and more along channels laid down by the system. Opportunities tend to be those that the system provides, the opportunities must be exploited in accord with rules and regulations [13], and techniques prescribed by experts must be followed if there is to be a chance of success. 67. Thus the power process is disrupted in our society through a deficiency of real goals and a deficiency of autonomy in the pursuit of goals. But it is also disrupted because of those human drives that fall into group 3: the drives that one cannot adequately satisfy no matter how much effort one makes. One of these drives is the need for security. Our lives depend on decisions made by other people; we have no control over these decisions and usually we do not even know the people who make them. (“We live in a world in which relatively few people — maybe 500 or 1,000 — make the important decisions”, Philip B. Heymann of Harvard Law School, quoted by Anthony Lewis, New York Times, April 21, 1995.) Our lives depend on whether safety standards at a nuclear power plant are properly maintained; on how much pesticide is allowed to get into our food or how much pollution into our air; on how skillful (or incompetent) our doctor is; whether we lose or get a job may depend on decisions made by government economists or corporation executives; and so forth. Most individuals are not in a position to secure themselves against these threats to more [than] a very limited extent. The individual’s search for security is therefore frustrated, which leads to a sense of powerlessness. 68. It may be objected that primitive man is physically less secure than modern man, as is shown by his shorter life expectancy; hence modern man suffers from less, not more than the amount of insecurity that is normal for human beings. But psychological security does not closely correspond with physical security. What makes us FEEL secure is not so much objective security as a sense of confidence in our ability to take care of ourselves. Primitive man, threatened by a fierce animal or by hunger, can fight in self-defense or travel in search of food. He has no certainty of success in these efforts, but he is by no means helpless against the things that threaten him. The modern individual on the other hand is threatened by many things against which he is helpless: nuclear accidents, carcinogens in food, environmental pollution, war, increasing taxes, invasion of his privacy by large organizations, nationwide social or economic phenomena that may disrupt his way of life. 69. It is true that primitive man is powerless against some of the things that threaten him; disease for example. But he can accept the risk of disease stoically. It is part of the nature of things, it is no one’s fault, unless it is the fault of some imaginary, impersonal demon. But threats to the modern individual tend to be MAN-MADE. They are not the results of chance but are IMPOSED on him by other persons whose decisions he, as an individual, is unable to influence. Consequently he feels frustrated, humiliated and angry. 70. Thus primitive man for the most part has his security in his own hands (either as an individual or as a member of a SMALL group) whereas the security of modern man is in the hands of persons or organizations that are too remote or too large for him to be able personally to influence them. So modern man’s drive for security tends to fall into groups 1 and 3; in some areas (food, shelter etc.) his security is assured at the cost of only trivial effort, whereas in other areas he CANNOT attain security. (The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way how the condition of modern man differs from that of primitive man.) 71. People have many transitory drives or impulses that are necessarily frustrated in modern life, hence fall into group 3. One may become angry, but modern society cannot permit fighting. In many situations it does not even permit verbal aggression. When going somewhere one may be in a hurry, or one may be in a mood to travel slowly, but one generally has no choice but to move with the flow of traffic and obey the traffic signals. One may want to do one’s work in a different way, but usually one can work only according to the rules laid down by one’s employer. In many other ways as well, modern man is strapped down by a network of rules and regulations (explicit or implicit) that frustrate many of his impulses and thus interfere with the power process. Most of these regulations cannot be dispensed with, because they are necessary for the functioning of industrial society. 72. Modern society is in certain respects extremely permissive. In matters that are irrelevant to the functioning of the system we can generally do what we please. We can believe in any religion (as long as it does not encourage behavior that is dangerous to the system). We can go to bed with anyone we like (as long as we practice “safe sex”). We can do anything we like as long as it is UNIMPORTANT. But in all IMPORTANT matters the system tends increasingly to regulate our behavior. 73. Behavior is regulated not only through explicit rules and not only by the government. Control is often exer8 cised through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation, and by organizations other than the government, or by the system as a whole. Most large organizations use some form of propaganda [14] to manipulate public attitudes or behavior. Propaganda is not limited to “commercials” and advertisements, and sometimes it is not even consciously intended as propaganda by the people who make it. For instance, the content of entertainment programming is a powerful form of propaganda. An example of indirect coercion: There is no law that says we have to go to work every day and follow our employer’s orders. Legally there is nothing to prevent us from going to live in the wild like primitive people or from going into business for ourselves. But in practice there is very little wild country left, and there is room in the economy for only a limited number of small business owners. Hence most of us can survive only as someone else’s employee. 74. We suggest that modern man’s obsession with longevity, and with maintaining physical vigor and sexual attractiveness to an advanced age, is a symptom of unfulfillment resulting from deprivation with respect to the power process. The “mid-lffe crisis” also is such a symptom. So is the lack of interest in having children that is fairly common in modern society but almost unheard-of in primitive societies. 75. In primitive societies life is a succession of stages. The needs and purposes of one stage having been fulfilled, there is no particular reluctance about passing on to the next stage. A young man goes through the power process by becoming a hunter, hunting not for sport or for fulfillment but to get meat that is necessary for food. (In young women the process is more complex, with greater emphasis on social power; we won’t discuss that here.) This phase having been successfully passed through, the young man has no reluctance about settling down to the responsibilities of raising a family. (In contrast, some modern people indefinitely postpone having children because they are too busy seeking some kind of “fulfillment.” We suggest that the fulfillment they need is adequate experience of the power process — with real goals instead of the artificial goals of surrogate activities.) Again, having successfully raised his children, going through the power process by providing them with the physical necessities, the primitive man feels that his work is done and he is prepared to accept old age (if he survives that long) and death. Many modern people, on the other hand, are disturbed by the prospect of physical deterioration and death, as is shown by the amount of effort they expend trying to maintain their physical condition, appearance and health. We argue that this is due to unfulfillment resulting from the fact that they have never put their physical powers to any practical use, have never gone through the power process using their bodies in a serious way. It is not the primitive man, who has used his body daily for practical purposes, who fears the deterioration of age, but the modern man, who has never had a practical use for his body beyond walking from his car to his house. It is the man whose need for the power process has been satisfied during his life who is best prepared to accept the end of that life. 76. In response to the arguments of this section someone will say, “Society must find a way to give people the opportunity to go through the power process.” This won’t work for those who need autonomy in the power process. For such people the value of the opportunity is destroyed by the very fact that society gives it to them. What they need is to find or make their own opportunities. As long as the system GIVES them their opportunities it still has them on a leash. To attain autonomy they must get off that leash. HOW SOME PEOPLE ADJUST 77. Not everyone in industrial-technological society suffers from psychological problems. Some people even profess to be quite satisfied with society as it is. We now discuss some of the reasons why people differ so greatly in their response to modern society. 78. First, there doubtless are differences in the strength of the drive for power. Individuals with a weak drive for power may have relatively little need to go through the power process, or at least relatively little need for autonomy in the power process. These are docile types who would have been happy as plantation darkies in the Old South. (We don’t mean to sneer at the “plantation darkies” of the Old South. To their credit, most of the slaves were NOT content with their servitude. We do sneer at people who ARE content with servitude.) 79. Some people may have some exceptional drive, in pursuing which they satisfy their need for the power process. For example, those who have an unusually strong drive for social status may spend their whole lives climbing the status ladder without ever getting bored with that game. 80. People vary in their susceptibility to advertising and marketing techniques. Some are so susceptible that, even if they make a great deal of money, they cannot satisfy their constant craving for the the shiny new toys that the marketing industry dangles before their eyes. So they always feel hard-pressed financially even if their income is large, and their cravings are frustrated. 81. Some people have low susceptibility to advertising and marketing techniques. These are the people who aren’t interested in money. Material acquisition does not serve their need for the power process. 82. People who have medium susceptibility to advertising and marketing techniques are able to earn enough money to satisfy their craving for goods and services, but only at the cost of serious effort (putting in overtime, taking a second job, earning promotions, etc.). Thus material acquisition serves their need for the power process. But it does not necessarily follow that their need is fully satisfied. They may have insufficient autonomy in the power process (their work may consist of following orders) and some of their drives may be frustrated (e.g., security, aggression). (We are guilty of oversimplification in paragraphs 80-82 because we have assumed that the desire 9 for material acquisition is entirely a creation of the advertising and marketing industry. Of course it’s not that simple. [11] 83. Some people partly satisfy their need for power by identifying themselves with a powerful organization or mass movement. An individual lacking goals or power joins a movement or an organization, adopts its goals as his own, then works toward those goals. When some of the goals are attained, the individual, even though his personal efforts have played only an insignificant part in the attainment of the goals, feels (through his identification with the movement or organization) as if he had gone through the power process. This phenomenon was exploited by the fascists, nazis and communists. Our society uses it too, though less crudely. Example: Manuel Noriega was an irritant to the U.S. (goal: punish Noriega). The U.S. invaded Panama (effort) and punished Noriega (attainment of goal). Thus the U.S. went through the power process and many Americans, because of their identification with the U.S., experienced the power process vicariously. Hence the widespread public approval of the Panama invasion; it gave people a sense of power. [15] We see the same phenomenon in armies, corporations, political parties, humanitarian organizations, religious or ideological movements. In particular, leftist movements tend to attract people who are seeking to satisfy their need for power. But for most people identification with a large organization or a mass movement does not fully satisfy the need for power. 84. Another way in which people satisfy their need for the power process is through surrogate activities. As we explained in paragraphs 38-40, a surrogate activity is an activity that is directed toward an artificial goal that the individual pursues for the sake of the “fulfillment” that he gets from pursuing the goal, not because he needs to attain the goal itself. For instance, there is no practical motive for building enormous muscles, hitting a little ball into a hole or acquiring a complete series of postage stamps. Yet many people in our society devote themselves with passion to bodybuilding, golf or stamp-collecting. Some people are more “other-directed” than others, and therefore will more readily attach importance to a surrogate activity simply because the people around them treat it as important or because society tells them it is important. That is why some people get very serious about essentially trivial activities such as sports, or bridge, or chess, or arcane scholarly pursuits, whereas others who are more clear-sighted never see these things as anything but the surrogate activities that they are, and consequently never attach enough importance to them to satisfy their need for the power process in that way. It only remains to point out that in many cases a person’s way of earning a living is also a surrogate activity. Not a PURE surrogate activity, since part of the motive for the activity is to gain the physical necessities and (for some people) social status and the luxuries that advertising makes them want. But many people put into their work far more effort than is necessary to earn whatever money and status they require, and this extra effort constitutes a surrogate activity. This extra effort, together with the emotional investment that accompanies it, is one of the most potent forces acting toward the continual development and perfecting of the system, with negative consequences for individual freedom (see paragraph 131). Especially, for the most creative scientists and engineers, work tends to be largely a surrogate activity. This point is so important that it deserves a separate discussion, which we shall give in a moment (paragraphs 87-92). 85. In this section we have explained how many people in modern society do satisfy their need for the power process to a greater or lesser extent. But we think that for the majority of people the need for the power process is not fully satisfied. In the first place, those who have an insatiable drive for status, or who get firmly “hooked” on a surrogate activity, or who identify strongly enough with a movement or organization to satisfy their need for power in that way, are exceptional personalities. Others are not fully satisfied with surrogate activities or by identification with an organization (see paragraphs 41, 64). In the second place, too much control is imposed by the system through explicit regulation or through socialization, which results in a deficiency of autonomy, and in frustration due to the impossibility of attaining certain goals and the necessity of restraining too many impulses. 86. But even if most people in industrial-technological society were well satisfied, we (FC) would still be opposed to that form of society, because (among other reasons) we consider it demeaning to fulfill one’s need for the power process through surrogate activities or through identification with an organization, rather than through pursuit of real goals. THE MOTIVES OF SCIENTISTS 87. Science and technology provide the most important examples of surrogate activities. Some scientists claim that they are motivated by “curiosity” or by a desire to “benefit humanity.” But it is easy to see that neither of these can be the principal motive of most scientists. As for “curiosity,” that notion is simply absurd. Most scientists work on highly specialized problems that are not the object of any normal curiosity. For example, is an astronomer, a mathematician or an entomologist curious about the properties of isopropyltrimethylmethane? Of course not. Only a chemist is curious about such a thing, and he is curious about it only because chemistry is his surrogate activity. Is the chemist curious about the appropriate classification of a new species of beetle? No. That question is of interest only to the entomologist, and he is interested in it only because entomology is his surrogate activity. If the chemist and the entomologist had to exert themselves seriously to obtain the physical necessities, and if that effort exercised their abilities in an interesting way but in some nonscientific pursuit, then they wouldn’t give a damn about isopropyltrimethylmethane or the classification of beetles. Suppose that lack of funds for postgraduate education had led the chemist to become an insurance broker instead of a chemist. In that case he would have been very interested 10 in insurance matters but would have cared nothing about isopropyltrimethylmethane. In any case it is not normal to put into the satisfaction of mere curiosity the amount of time and effort that scientists put into their work. The “curiosity” explanation for the scientists’ motive just doesn’t stand up. 88. The “benefit of humanity” explanation doesn’t work any better. Some scientific work has no conceivable relation to the welfare of the human race most of archaeology or comparative linguistics for example. Some other areas of science present obviously dangerous possibilities. Yet scientists in these areas are just as enthusiastic about their work as those who develop vaccines or study air pollution. Consider the case of Dr. Edward Teller, who had an obvious emotional involvement in promoting nuclear power plants. Did this involvement stem from a desire to benefit humanity? If so, then why didn’t Dr. Teller get emotional about other “humanitarian” causes? If he was such a humanitarian then why did he help to develop the H-bomb? As with many other scientific achievements, it is very much open to question whether nuclear power plants actually do benefit humanity. Does the cheap electricity outweigh the accumulating waste and the risk of accidents? Dr. Teller saw only one side of the question. Clearly his emotional involvement with nuclear power arose not from a desire to “benefit humanity” but from a personal fulfillment he got from his work and from seeing it put to practical use. 89. The same is true of scientists generally. With possible rare exceptions, their motive is neither curiosity nor a desire to benefit humanity but the need to go through the power process: to have a goal (a scientific problem to solve), to make an effort (research) and to attain the goal (solution of the problem.) Science is a surrogate activity because scientists work mainly for the fulfillment they get out of the work itself. 90. Of course, it’s not that simple. Other motives do play a role for many scientists. Money and status for example. Some scientists may be persons of the type who have an insatiable drive for status (see paragraph 79) and this may provide much of the motivation for their work. No doubt the majority of scientists, like the majority of the general population, are more or less susceptible to advertising and marketing techniques and need money to satisfy their craving for goods and services. Thus science is not a PURE surrogate activity. But it is in large part a surrogate activity. 91. Also, science and technology constitute a power mass movement, and many scientists gratify their need for power through identification with this mass movement (see paragraph 83). 92. Thus science marches on blindly, without regard to the real welfare of the human race or to any other standard, obedient only to the psychological needs of the scientists and of the government of ficials and corporation executives who provide the funds for research. THE NATURE OF FREEDOM 93. We are going to argue that industrial-technological society cannot be reformed in such a way as to prevent it from progressively narrowing the sphere of human freedom. But, because “freedom” is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must first make clear what kind of freedom we are concerned with. 94. By “freedom” we mean the opportunity to go through the power process, with real goals not the artificial goals of surrogate activities, and without interference, manipulation or supervision from anyone, especially from any large organization. Freedom means being in control (either as an individual or as a member of a SMALL group) of the life-and-death issues of one’s existence: food, clothing, shelter and defense against whatever threats there may be in one’s environment. Freedom means having power; not the power to control other people but the power to control the circumstances of one’s own life. One does not have freedom if anyone else (especially a large organization) has power over one, no matter how benevolently, tolerantly and permissively that power may be exercised. It is important not to confuse freedom with mere permissiveness (see paragraph 72). 95. It is said that we live in a free society because we have a certain number of constitutionally guaranteed rights. But these are not as important as they seem. The degree of personal freedom that exists in a society is determined more by the economic and technological structure of the society than by its laws or its form of government. [16] Most of the Indian nations of New England were monarchies, and many of the cities of the Italian Renaissance were controlled by dictators. But in reading about these societies one gets the impression that they allowed far more personal freedom than our society does. In part this was because they lacked efficient mechanisms for enforcing the ruler’s will: There were no modern, wellorganized police forces, no rapid long-distance communications, no surveillance cameras, no dossiers of information about the lives of average citizens. Hence it was relatively easy to evade control. 96. As for our constitutional rights, consider for example that of freedom of the press. We certainly don’t mean to knock that right; it is very important tool for limiting concentration of political power and for keeping those who do have political power in line by publicly exposing any misbehavior on their part. But freedom of the press is of very little use to the average citizen as an individual. The mass media are mostly under the control of large organizations that are integrated into the system. Anyone who has a little money can have something printed, or can distribute it on the Internet or in some such way, but what he has to say will be swamped by the vast volume of material put out by the media, hence it will have no practical effect. To make an impression on society with words is therefore almost impossible for most individuals and small groups. Take us (FC) for example. If we had never done anything violent and had submitted the present writings to a publisher, they probably would not have been accepted. If they had been been accepted and 11 published, they probably would not have attracted many readers, because it’s more fun to watch the entertainment put out by the media than to read a sober essay. Even ff these writings had had many readers, most of these readers would soon have forgotten what they had read as their minds were flooded by the mass of material to which the media expose them. In order to get our message before the public with some chance of making a lasting impression, we’ve had to kill people. 97. Constitutional rights are useful up to a point, but they do not serve to guarantee much more than what might be called the bourgeois conception of freedom. According to the bourgeois conception, a “free” man is essentially an element of a social machine and has only a certain set of prescribed and delimited freedoms; freedoms that are designed to serve the needs of the social machine more than those of the individual. Thus the bourgeois’s “free” man has economic freedom because that promotes growth and progress; he has freedom of the press because public criticism restrains misbehavior by political leaders; he has a right to a fair trial because imprisonment at the whim of the powerful would be bad for the system. This was clearly the attitude of Simon Bolivar. To him, people deserved liberty only if they used it to promote progress (progress as conceived by the bourgeois). Other bourgeois thinkers have taken a similar view of freedom as a mere means to collective ends. Chester C. Tan, “Chinese Political Thought in the Twentieth Century,” page 202, explains the philosophy of the Kuomintang leader Hu Han-min: “An individual is granted rights because he is a member of society and his community life requires such rights. By community Hu meant the whole society of the nation.” And on page 259 Tan states that according to Carsum Chang (Chang Chun-mai, head of the State Socialist Party in China) freedom had to be used in the interest of the state and of the people as a whole. But what kind of freedom does one have if one can use it only as someone else prescribes? FC’s conception of freedom is not that of Bolivar, Hu, Chang or other bourgeois theorists. The trouble with such theorists is that they have made the development and application of social theories their surrogate activity. Consequently the theories are designed to serve the needs of the theorists more than the needs of any people who may be unlucky enough to live in a society on which the theories are imposed. 98. One more point to be made in this section: It should not be assumed that a person has enough freedom just because he SAYS he has enough. Freedom is restricted in part by psychological controls of which people are unconscious, and moreover many people’s ideas of what constitutes freedom are governed more by social convention than by their real needs. For example, it’s likely that many leftists of the oversocialized type would say that most people, including themselves, are socialized too little rather than too much, yet the oversocialized leftist pays a heavy psychological price for his high level of socialization. SOME PRINCIPLES OF HISTORY 99. Think of history as being the sum of two components: an erratic component that consists of unpredictable events that follow no discernible pattern, and a regular component that consists of long-term historical trends. Here we are concerned with the long-term trends. 100. FIRST PRINCIPLE. If a SMALL change is made that affects a long-term historical trend, then the effect of that change will almost always be transitory — the trend will soon revert to its original state. (Example: A reform movement designed to clean up political corruption in a society rarely has more than a short-term effect; sooner or later the reformers relax and corruption creeps back in. The level of political corruption in a given society tends to remain constant, or to change only slowly with the evolution of the society. Normally, a political cleanup will be permanent only if accompanied by widespread social changes; a SMALL change in the society won’t be enough.) If a small change in a long-term historical trend appears to be permanent, it is only because the change acts in the direction in which the trend is already moving, so that the trend is not altered by only pushed a step ahead. 101. The first principle is almost a tautology. If a trend were not stable with respect to small changes, it would wander at random rather than following a definite direction; in other words it would not be a long-term trend at all. 102. SECOND PRINCIPLE. If a change is made that is sufficiently large to alter permanently a long-term historical trend, then it will alter the society as a whole. In other words, a society is a system in which all parts are interrelated, and you can’t permanently change any important part without changing all other parts as well. 103. THIRD PRINCIPLE. If a change is made that is large enough to alter permanently a long-term trend, then the consequences for the society as a whole cannot be predicted in advance. (Unless various other societies have passed through the same change and have all experienced the same consequences, in which case one can predict on empirical grounds that another society that passes through the same change will be like to experience similar consequences.) 104. FOURTH PRINCIPLE. A new kind of society cannot be designed on paper. That is, you cannot plan out a new form of society in advance, then set it up and expect it to function as it was designed to do. 105. The third and fourth principles result from the complexity of human societies. A change in human behavior will affect the economy of a society and its physical environment; the economy will affect the environment and vice versa, and the changes in the economy and the environment will affect human behavior in complex, unpredictable ways; and so forth. The network of causes and effects is far too complex to be untangled and understood. 106. FIFTH PRINCIPLE. People do not consciously and rationally choose the form of their society. Societies develop through processes of social evolution that are not under rational human control. 12 107. The fifth principle is a consequence of the other four. 108. To illustrate: By the first principle, generally speaking an attempt at social reform either acts in the direction in which the society is developing anyway (so that it merely accelerates a change that would have occurred in any case) or else it has only a transitory effect, so that the society soon slips back into its old groove. To make a lasting change in the direction of development of any important aspect of a society, reform is insufficient and revolution is required. (A revolution does not necessarily involve an armed uprising or the overthrow of a government.) By the second principle, a revolution never changes only one aspect of a society, it changes the whole society; and by the third principle changes occur that were never expected or desired by the revolutionaries. By the fourth principle, when revolutionaries or utopians set up a new kind of society, it never works out as planned. 109. The American Revolution does not provide a counterexample. The American “Revolution” was not a revolution in our sense of the word, but a war of independence followed by a rather far-reaching political reform. The Founding Fathers did not change the direction of development of American society, nor did they aspire to do so. They only freed the development of American society from the retarding effect of British rule. Their political reform did not change any basic trend, but only pushed American political culture along its natural direction of development. British society, of which American society was an offshoot, had been moving for a long time in the direction of representative democracy. And prior to the War of Independence the Americans were already practicing a significant degree of representative democracy in the colonial assemblies. The political system established by the Constitution was modeled on the British system and on the colonial assemblies. With major alteration, to be sure — there is no doubt that the Founding Fathers took a very important step. But it was a step along the road that English-speaking world was already traveling. The proof is that Britain and all of its colonies that were populated predominantly by people of British descent ended up with systems of representative democracy essentially similar to that of the United States. If the Founding Fathers had lost their nerve and declined to sign the Declaration of Independence, our way of lffe today would not have been significantly different. Maybe we would have had somewhat closer ties to Britain, and would have had a Parliament and Prime Minister instead of a Congress and President. No big deal. Thus the American Revolution provides not a counterexample to our principles but a good illustration of them. 110. Still, one has to use common sense in applying the principles. They are expressed in imprecise language that allows latitude for interpretation, and exceptions to them can be found. So we present these principles not as inviolable laws but as rules of thumb, or guides to thinking, that may provide a partial antidote to naive ideas about the future of society. The principles should be borne constantly in mind, and whenever one reaches a conciusion that conflicts with them one should carefully reexamine one’s thinking and retain the conclusion only if one has good, solid reasons for doing so. INDUSTRIAL-TECHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY CANNOT BE REFORMED 111. The foregoing principles help to show how hopelessly difficult it would be to reform the industrial system in such a way as to prevent it from progressively narrowing our sphere of freedom. There has been a consistent tendency, going back at least to the Industrial Revolution for technology to strengthen the system at a high cost in individual freedom and local autonomy. Hence any change designed to protect freedom from technology would be contrary to a fundamental trend in the development of our society. Consequently, such a change either would be a transitory one — soon swamped by the tide of history — or, if large enough to be permanent would alter the nature of our whole society. This by the first and second principles. Moreover, since society would be altered in a way that could not be predicted in advance (third principle) there would be great risk. Changes large enough to make a lasting difference in favor of freedom would not be initiated because it would be realized that they would gravely disrupt the system. So any attempts at reform would be too timid to be effective. Even if changes large enough to make a lasting difference were initiated, they would be retracted when their disruptive effects became apparent. Thus, permanent changes in favor of freedom could be brought about only by persons prepared to accept radical, dangerous and unpredictable alteration of the entire system. In other words by revolutionaries, not reformers. 112. People anxious to rescue freedom without sacrificing the supposed benefits of technology will suggest naive schemes for some new form of society that would reconcile freedom with technology. Apart from the fact that people who make such suggestions seldom propose any practical means by which the new form of society could be set up in the first place, it follows from the fourth principle that even if the new form of society could be once established, it either would collapse or would give results very different from those expected. 113. So even on very general grounds it seems highly improbable that any way of changing society could be found that would reconcile freedom with modern technology. In the next few sections we will give more specific reasons for concluding that freedom and technological progress are incompatible. RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IS UNAVOIDABLE IN INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY 114. As explained in paragraphs 65-67, 70-73, modern man is strapped down by a network of rules and regulations, and his fate depends on the actions of persons remote from him whose decisions he cannot influence. This is not accidental or a result of the arbitrariness of arrogant bureaucrats. It is necessary and inevitable in any technologically advanced society. The system HAS TO regulate human behavior closely in order to function. At work people 13 have to do what they are told to do, otherwise production would be thrown into chaos. Bureaucracies HAVE TO be run according to rigid rules. To allow any substantial personal discretion to lower-level bureaucrats would disrupt the system and lead to charges of unfairness due to differences in the way individual bureaucrats exercised their discretion. It is true that some restrictions on our freedom could be eliminated, but GENERALLY SPEAKING the regulation of our lives by large organizations is necessary for the functioning of industrial-technological society. The result is a sense of powerlessness on the part of the average person. It may be, however, that formal regulations will tend increasingly to be replaced by psychological tools that make us want to do what the system requires of us. (Propaganda [14], educational techniques, “mental health” programs, etc.) 115. The system HAS TO force people to behave in ways that are increasingly remote from the natural pattern of human behavior. For example, the system needs scientists, mathematicians and engineers. It can’t function without them. So heavy pressure is put on children to excel in these fields. It isn’t natural for an adolescent human being to spend the bulk of his time sitting at a desk absorbed in study. A normal adolescent wants to spend his time in active contact with the real world. Among primitive peoples the things that children are trained to do tend to be in reasonable harmony with natural human impulses. Among the American Indians, for example, boys were trained in active outdoor pursuits — just the sort of thing that boys like. But in our society children are pushed into studying technical subjects, which most do grudgingly. 116. Because of the constant pressure that the system exerts to modify human behavior, there is a gradual increase in the number of people who cannot or will not adjust to society’s requirements: welfare leeches, youth gang members, cultists, anti-government rebels, radical environmentalist saboteurs, dropouts and resisters of various kinds. 117. In any technologically advanced society the individual’s fate MUST depend on decisions that he personally cannot influence to any great extent. A technological society cannot be broken down into small, autonomous communities, because production depends on the cooperation of very large numbers of people and machines. Such a society MUST be highly organized and decisions HAVE TO be made that affect very large numbers of people. When a decision affects, say, a million people, then each of the affected individuals has, on the average, only a onemillionth share in making the decision. What usually happens in practice is that decisions are made by public officials or corporation executives, or by technical specialists, but even when the public votes on a decision the number of voters ordinarily is too large for the vote of any one individual to be significant. [17] Thus most individuals are unable to influence measurably the major decisions that affect their lives. There is no conceivable way to remedy this in a technologically advanced society. The system tries to “solve” this problem by using propaganda to make people WANT the decisions that have been made for them, but even if this “solution” were completely successful in making people feel better, it would be demeaning. 118. Conservatives and some others advocate more “local autonomy.” Local communities once did have autonomy, but such autonomy becomes less and less possible as local communities become more enmeshed with and dependent on large-scale systems like public utilities, computer networks, highway systems, the mass communications media, the modern health care system. Also operating against autonomy is the fact that technology applied in one location often affects people at other locations far way. Thus pesticide or chemical use near a creek may contaminate the water supply hundreds of miles downstream, and the greenhouse effect affects the whole world. 119. The system does not and cannot exist to satisfy human needs. Instead, it is human behavior that has to be modified to fit the needs of the system. This has nothing to do with the political or social ideology that may pretend to guide the technological system. It is not the fault of capitalism and it is not the fault of socialism. It is the fault of technology, because the system is guided not by ideology but by technical necessity. [18] Of course the system does satisfy many human needs, but generally speaking it does this only to the extend that it is to the advantage of the system to do it. It is the needs of the system that are paramount, not those of the human being. For example, the system provides people with food because the system couldn’t function if everyone starved; it attends to people’s psychological needs whenever it can CONVENIENTLY do so, because it couldn’t function if too many people became depressed or rebellious. But the system, for good, solid, practical reasons, must exert constant pressure on people to mold their behavior to the needs of the system. To much waste accumulating? The government, the media, the educational system, environmentalists, everyone inundates us with a mass of propaganda about recycling. Need more technical personnel? A chorus of voices exhorts kids to study science. No one stops to ask whether it is inhumane to force adolescents to spend the bulk of their time studying subjects most of them hate. When skilled workers are put out of a job by technical advances and have to undergo “retraining,” no one asks whether it is humiliating for them to be pushed around in this way. It is simply taken for granted that everyone must bow to technical necessity. and for good reason: If human needs were put before technical necessity there would be economic problems, unemployment, shortages or worse. The concept of “mental health” in our society is defined largely by the extent to which an individual behaves in accord with the needs of the system and does so without showing signs of stress. 120. Efforts to make room for a sense of purpose and for autonomy within the system are no better than a joke. For example, one company, instead of having each of its employees assemble only one section of a catalogue, had each assemble a whole catalogue, and this was supposed to give them a sense of purpose and achievement. Some companies have tried to give their employees more autonomy in their work, but for practical reasons this usually can be done only to a very limited extent, and in any case employees are never given autonomy as to ultimate goals 14 — their “autonomous” efforts can never be directed toward goals that they select personally, but only toward their employer’s goals, such as the survival and growth of the company. Any company would soon go out of business if it permitted its employees to act otherwise. Similarly, in any enterprise within a socialist system, workers must direct their efforts toward the goals of the enterprise, otherwise the enterprise will not serve its purpose as part of the system. Once again, for purely technical reasons it is not possible for most individuals or small groups to have much autonomy in industrial society. Even the small-business owner commonly has only limited autonomy. Apart from the necessity of government regulation, he is restricted by the fact that he must fit into the economic system and conform to its requirements. For instance, when someone develops a new technology, the small- business person often has to use that technology whether he wants to or not, in order to remain competitive. THE ’BAD’ PARTS OF TECHNOLOGY CANNOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE ’GOOD’ PARTS 121. A further reason why industrial society cannot be reformed in favor of freedom is that modern technology is a unified system in which all parts are dependent on one another. You can’t get rid of the “bad” parts of technology and retain only the “good” parts. Take modern medicine, for example. Progress in medical science depends on progress in chemistry, physics, biology, computer science and other fields. Advanced medical treatments require expensive, high-tech equipment that can be made available only by a technologically progressive, economically rich society. Clearly you can’t have much Progress in medicine without the whole technological system and everything that goes with it. 122. Even if medical progress could be maintained without the rest of the technological system, it would by itself bring certain evils. Suppose for example that a cure for diabetes is discovered. People with a genetic tendency to diabetes will then be able to survive and reproduce as well as anyone else. Natural selection against genes for diabetes will cease and such genes will spread throughout the population. (This may be occurring to some extent already, since diabetes, while not curable, can be controlled through use of insulin.) The same thing will happen with many other diseases susceptibility to which is affected by genetic degradation of the population. The only solution will be some sort of eugenics program or extensive genetic engineering of human beings, so that man in the future will no longer be a creation of nature, or of chance, or of God (depending on your religious or philosophical opinions), but a manufactured product. 123. If you think that big government interferes in your life too much NOW, just wait till the government starts regulating the genetic constitution of your children. Such regulation will inevitably follow the introduction of genetic engineering of human beings, because the consequences of unregulated genetic engineering would be disastrous. [19] 124. The usual response to such concerns is to talk about “medical ethics.” But a code of ethics would not serve to protect freedom in the face of medical progress; it would only make matters worse. A code of ethics applicable to genetic engineering would be in effect a means of regulating the genetic constitution of human beings. Somebody (probably the upper-middle class, mostly) would decide that such and such applications of genetic engineering were “ethical”. and others were not, so that in effect they would be imposing their own values on the genetic constitution of the population at large. Even if a code of ethics were chosen on a completely democratic basis, the majority would be imposing their own values on any minorities who might have a different idea of what constituted an “ethical” use of genetic engineering. The only code of ethics that would truly protect freedom would be one that prohibited ANY genetic engineering of human beings, and you can be sure that no such code will ever be applied in a technological society. No code that reduced genetic engineering to a minor role could stand up for long, because the temptation presented by the immense power of biotechnology would be irresistible, especially since to the majority of people many of its applications will seem obviously and unequivocally good (eliminating physical and mental diseases, giving people the abilities they need to get along in today’s world). Inevitably, genetic engineering will be used extensively, but only in ways consistent with the needs of the industrial-technological system. [20] TECHNOLOGY IS A MORE POWERFUL SOCIAL FORCE THAN THE ASPIRATION FOR FREEDOOM 125. It is not possible to make a LASTING compromise between technology and freedom, because technology is by far the more powerful social force and continually encroaches on freedom through REPEATED compromises. Imagine the case of two neighbors, each of whom at the outset owns the same amount of land, but one of whom is more powerful than the other. The powerful one demands a piece of the other’s land. The weak one refuses. The powerful one says, “OK, let’s compromise. Give me half of what I asked.” The weak one has little choice but to give in. Some time later the powerful neighbor demands another piece of land, again there is a compromise, and so forth. By forcing a long series of compromises on the weaker man, the powerful one eventually gets all of his land. So it goes in the conflict between technology and freedom. 126. Let us explain why technology is a more powerful social force than the aspiration for freedom. 127. A technological advance that appears not to threaten freedom often turns out to threaten it very seriously later on. For example, consider motorized transport. A walking man formerly could go where he pleased, go at his own pace without observing any traffic regulations, and was independent of technological support-systems. When motor vehicles were introduced they appeared to increase man’s freedom. They took no freedom away from the walking man, no one had to have an automobile if he 15 didn’t want one, and anyone who did choose to buy an automobile could travel much faster and farther than a walking man. But the introduction of motorized transport soon changed society in such a way as to restrict greatly man’s freedom of locomotion. When automobiles became numerous, it became necessary to regulate their use extensively. In a car, especially in densely populated areas, one cannot just go where one likes at one’s own pace; one’s movement is governed by the flow of traffic and by various traffic laws. One is tied down by various obligations: license requirements, driver test, renewing registration, insurance, maintenance required for safety, monthly payments on purchase price. Moreover, the use of motorized transport is no longer optional. Since the introduction of motorized transport the arrangement of our cities has changed in such a way that the majority of people no longer live within walking distance of their place of employment, shopping areas and recreational opportunities, so that they HAVE TO depend on the automobile for transportation. Or else they must use public transportation, in which case they have even less control over their own movement than when driving a car. Even the walker’s freedom is now greatly restricted. In the city he continually has to stop to wait for traffic lights that are designed mainly to serve auto traffic. In the country, motor traffic makes it dangerous and unpleasant to walk along the highway. (Note this important point that we have just illustrated with the case of motorized transport: When a new item of technology is introduced as an option that an individual can accept or not as he chooses, it does not necessarily REMAIN optional. In many cases the new technology changes society in such a way that people eventually find themselves FORCED to use it.) 128. While technological progress AS A WHOLE continually narrows our sphere of freedom, each new technical advance CONSIDERED BY ITSELF appears to be desirable. Electricity, indoor plumbing, rapid long-distance communications... how could one argue against any of these things, or against any other of the innumerable technical advances that have made modern society? It would have been absurd to resist the introduction of the telephone, for example. It offered many advantages and no disadvantages. Yet, as we explained in paragraphs 59-76, all these technical advances taken together have created a world in which the average man’s fate is no longer in his own hands or in the hands of his neighbors and friends, but in those of politicians, corporation executives and remote, anonymous technicians and bureaucrats whom he as an individual has no power to influence. [21] The same process will continue in the future. Take genetic engineering, for example. Few people will resist the introduction of a genetic technique that eliminates a hereditary disease. It does no apparent harm and prevents.much suffering. Yet a large number of genetic improvements taken together will make the human being into an engineered product rather than a free creation of chance (or of God, or whatever, depending on your religious beliefs). 129. Another reason why technology is such a powerful social force is that, within the context of a given society, technological progress marches in only one direction; it can never be reversed. Once a technical innovation has been introduced, people usually become dependent on it, so that they can never again do without it, unless it is replaced by some still more advanced innovation. Not only do people become dependent as individuals on a new item of technology, but, even more, the system as a whole becomes dependent on it. (Imagine what would happen to the system today if computers, for example, were eliminated.) Thus the system can move in only one direction, toward greater technologization. Technology repeatedly forces freedom to take a step back, but technology can never take a step back — short of the overthrow of the whole technological system. 130. TechnoIogy advances with great rapidity and threatens freedom at many different points at the same time (crowding, rules and regulations, increasing dependence of individuals on large organizations, propaganda and other psychological techniques, genetic engineering, invasion of privacy through surveillance devices and computers, etc.). To hold back any ONE of the threats to freedom would require a long and difficult social struggle. Those who want to protect freedom are overwhelmed by the sheer number of new attacks and the rapidity with which they develop, hence they become apathetic and no longer resist. To fight each of the threats separately would be futile. Success can be hoped for only by fighting the technological system as a whole; but that is revolution, not reform. 131. Technicians (we use this term in its broad sense to describe all those who perform a specialized task that requires training) tend to be so involved in their work (their surrogate activity) that when a conflict arises between their technical work and freedom, they almost always decide in favor of their technical work. This is obvious in the case of scientists, but it also appears elsewhere: educators, humanitarian groups, conservation organizations do not hesitate to use propaganda[14] or other psychological techniques to help them achieve their laudable ends. Corporations and government agencies, when they find it useful, do not hesitate to collect information about individuals without regard to their privacy. Law enforcement agencies are frequently inconvenienced by the constitutional rights of suspects and often of completely innocent persons, and they do whatever they can do legally (or sometimes illegally) to restrict or circumvent those rights. Most of these educators, government officials and law officers believe in freedom, privacy and constitutional rights, but when these conflict with their work, they usually feel that their work is more important. 132. It is well known that people generally work better and more persistently when striving for a reward than when attempting to avoid a punishment or negative outcome. Scientists and other technicians are motivated mainly by the rewards they get through their work. But those who oppose technological invasions of freedom are working to avoid a negative outcome, consequently there are few who work persistently and well at this discouraging task. If reformers ever achieved a signal victory that seemed to set up a solid barrier against further erosion of freedom through technical progress, most would tend to 16 relax and turn their attention to more agreeable pursuits. But the scientists would remain busy in their laboratories, and technology as it progresses would find ways, in spite of any barriers, to exert more and more control over individuals and make them always more dependent on the system. 133. No social arrangements, whether laws, institutions, customs or ethical codes, can provide permanent protection against technology. History shows that all social arrangements are transitory; they all change or break down eventually. But technological advances are permanent within the context of a given civilization. Suppose for example that it were possible to arrive at some social arrangements that would prevent genetic engineering from being applied to human beings, or prevent it from being applied in such a way as to threaten freedom and dignity. Still, the technology would remain waiting. Sooner or later the social arrangement would break down. Probably sooner, given the pace of change in our society. Then genetic engineering would begin to invade our sphere of freedom. and this invasion would be irreversible (short of a breakdown of technological civilization itself). Any illusions about achieving anything permanent through social arrangements should be dispelled by what is currently happening with environmental legislation. A few years ago its seemed that there were secure legal barriers preventing at least SOME of the worst forms of environmental degradation. A change in the political wind, and those barriers begin to crumble. 134. For all of the foregoing reasons, technology is a more powerful social force than the aspiration for freedom. But this statement requires an important qualification. It appears that during the next several decades the industrial-technological system will be undergoing severe stresses due to economic and environmental problems, and especially due to problems of human behavior (alienation, rebellion, hostility, a variety of social and psychological difficulties). We hope that the stresses through which the system is likely to pass will cause it to break down, or at least will weaken it sufficiently so that a revolution against it becomes possible. If such a revolution occurs and is successful, then at that particular moment the aspiration for freedom will have proved more powerful than technology. 135. In paragraph 125 we used an analogy of a weak neighbor who is left destitute by a strong neighbor who takes all his land by forcing on him a series of compromises. But suppose now that the strong neighbor gets sick, so tha he is unable to defend himself. The weak neighbor can force the strong one to give him his land back, or he can kill him. If he lets the strong man survive and only forces him to give the land back, he is a fool, because when the strong man gets well he will again take all the land for himself. The only sensible alternative for the weaker man is to kill the strong one while he has the chance. In the same way, while the industrial system is sick we must destroy it. If we compromise with it and let it recover from its sickness, it will eventually wipe out all of our freedom. SIMPLER SOCIAL PROBLEMS HAVE PROVED INTRACTABLE 136. If anyone still imagines that it would be possible to reform the system in such a way as to protect freedom from technology, let him consider how clumsily and for the most part unsuccessfully our society has dealt with other social problems that are far more simple and straighfforward. Among other things, the system has failed to stop environmental degradation, political corruption, drug trafficking or domestic abuse. 137. Take our environmental problems, for example. Here the conflict of values is straightforward: economic expedience now versus saving some of our natural resources for our grandchildren. [22] But on this subject we get only a lot of blather and obfuscation from the people who have power, and nothing like a clear, consistent line of action, and we keep on piling up environmental problems that our grandchildren will have to live with. Attempts to resolve the environmental issue consist of struggles and compromises between different factions, some of which are ascendant at one moment, others at another moment. The line of struggle changes with the shifting currents of public opinion. This is not a rational process, nor is it one that is likely to lead to a timely and successful solution to the problem. Major social problems, if they get “solved” at all, are rarely or never solved through any rational, comprehensive plan. They just work themselves out through a process in which various competing groups pursuing their own (usually short-term) selfinterest [23] arrive (mainly by luck) at some more or less stable modus vivendi. In fact, the principles we formulated in paragraphs 100-106 make it seem doubtful that rational long-term social planning can EVER be successful. 138. Thus it is clear that the human race has at best a very limited capacity for solving even relatively straightforward social problems. How then is it going to solve the far more difficult and subtle problem of reconciling freedom with technology? Technology presents clear-cut material advantages, whereas freedom is an abstraction that means different things to different people. and its loss is easily obscured by propaganda and fancy talk. 139. And note this important difference: It is conceivable that our environmental problems (for example) may some day be settled through a rational, comprehensive plan, but if this happens it will be only because it is in the longterm interest of the system to solve these problems. But it is NOT in the interest of the system to preserve freedom or small-group autonomy. On the contrary, it is in the interest of the system to bring human behavior under control to the greatest possible extent. [24] Thus, while practical considerations may eventually force the system to take a rational, prudent approach to environmental problems, equally practical considerations will force the system to regulate human behavior ever more closely (preferably by indirect means that will disguise the encroachment on freedom). This isn’t just our opinion. Eminent social scientists (e.g. James Q. Wilson) have stressed the importance of “socializing” people more effectively. 17 REVOLUTION IS EASIER THAN REFORM 140. We hope we have convinced the reader that the system cannot be reformed in such a way as to reconcile freedom with technology. The only way out is to dispense with the industrialtechnological system altogether. This implies revolution, not necessarily an armed uprising, but certainly a radical and fundamental change in the nature of society. 141. People tend to assume that because a revolution involves a much greater change than reform does, it is more difficult to bring about than reform is. Actually, under certain circumstances revolution is much easier than reform. The reason is that a revolutionary movement can inspire an intensity of commitment that a reform movement cannot inspire. A reform movement merely offers to solve a particular social problem. A revolutionary movement offers to solve all problems at one stroke and create a whole new world; it provides the kind of ideal for which people will take great risks and make great sacrifices. For this reasons it would be much easier to overthrow the whole technological system than to put effective, permanent restraints on the development or application of any one segment of technology, such as genetic engineering, for example. Not many people will devote themselves with single-minded passion to imposing and maintaining restraints on genetic engineering, but under suitable conditions large numbers of people may devote themselves passionately to a revolution against the industrial-technological system. As we noted in paragraph 132, reformers seeking to limit certain aspects of technology would be working to avoid a negative outcome. But revolutionaries work to gain a powerful reward — fulfillment of their revolutionary vision — and therefore work harder and more persistently than reformers do. 142. Reform is always restrained by the fear of painful consequences if changes go too far. But once a revolutionary fever has taken hold of a society, people are willing to undergo unlimited hardships for the sake of their revolution. This was clearly shown in the French and Russian Revolutions. It may be that in such cases only a minority of the population is really committed to the revolution, but this minority is sufficiently large and active so that it becomes the dominant force in society. We will have more to say about revolution in paragraphs 180-205. CONTROL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR 143. Since the beginning of civilization, organized societies have had to put pressures on human beings of the sake of the functioning of the social organism. The kinds of pressures vary greatly from one society to another. Some of the pressures are physical (poor diet, excessive labor, environmental pollution), some are psychological (noise, crowding, forcing human behavior into the mold that society requires). In the past, human nature has been approximately constant, or at any rate has varied only within certain bounds. Consequently, societies have been able to push people only up to certain limits. When the limit of human endurance has been passed, things start going wrong: rebellion, or crime, or corruption, or evasion of work, or depression and other mental problems, or an elevated death rate, or a declining birth rate or something else, so that either the society breaks down, or its functioning becomes too inefficient and it is (quickly or gradually, through conquest, attrition or evolution) replaced by some more efficient form of society. [25] 144. Thus human nature has in the past put certain limits on the development of societies. People could be pushed only so far and no farther. But today this may be changing, because modern technology is developing ways of modifying human beings. 145. Imagine a society that subjects people to conditions that make them terribly unhappy, then gives them drugs to take away their unhappiness. Science fiction? It is already happening to some extent in our own society. It is well known that the rate of clinical depression has been greatly increasing in recent decades. We believe that this is due to disruption of the power process, as explained in paragraphs 59-76. But even if we are wrong, the increasing rate of depression is certainly the result of SOME conditions that exist in today’s society. Instead of removing the conditions that make people depressed, modern society gives them antidepressant drugs. In effect, antidepressants are a means of modifying an individual’s internal state in such a way as to enable him to tolerate social conditions that he would otherwise find intolerable. (Yes, we know that depression is often of purely genetic origin. We are referring here to those cases in which environment plays the predominant role.) 146. Drugs that affect the mind are only one example of the new methods of controlling human behavior that modern society is developing. Let us look at some of the other methods. 147. To start with, there are the techniques of surveillance. Hidden video cameras are now used in most stores and in many other places, computers are used to collect and process vast amounts of information about individuals. Information so obtained greatly increases the effectiveness of physical coercion (i.e., law enforcement). [26] Then there are the methods of propaganda, for which the mass communication media provide effective vehicles. Efflcient techniques have been developed for winning elections, selling products, influencing public opinion. The entertainment industry serves as an important psychological tool of the system, possibly even when it is dishing out large amounts of sex and violence. Entertainment provides modern man with an essential means of escape. While absorbed in television, videos, etc., he can forget stress, anxiety, frustration, dissatisfaction. Many primitive peoples, when they don’t have work to do, are quite content to sit for hours at a time doing nothing at all, because they are at peace with themselves and their world. But most modern people must be constantly occupied or 18 entertained, otherwise they get “bored,” i.e., they get fidgety, uneasy, irritable. 148. Other techniques strike deeper than the foregoing. Education is no longer a simple affair of paddling a kid’s behind when he doesn’t know his lessons and patting him on the head when he does know them. It is becoming a scientific technique for controlling the child’s development. Sylvan Learning Centers, for example, have had great success in motivating children to study, and psychological techniques are also used with more or less success in many conventional schools. “Parenting” techniques that are taught to parents are designed to make children accept fundamental values of the system and behave in ways that the system finds desirable. “Mental health” programs, “intervention” techniques, psychotherapy and so forth are ostensibly designed to benefit individuals, but in practice they usually serve as methods for inducing individuals to think and behave as the system requires. (There is no contradiction here; an individual whose attitudes or behavior bring him into conflict with the system is up against a force that is too powerful for him to conquer or escape from, hence he is likely to suffer from stress, frustration, defeat. His path will be much easier if he thinks and behaves as the system requires. In that sense the system is acting for the benefit of the individual when it brainwashes him into conformity.) Child abuse in its gross and obvious forms is disapproved in most if not all cultures. Tormenting a child for a trivial reason or no reason at all is something that appalls almost everyone. But many psychologists interpret the concept of abuse much more broadly. Is spanking, when used as part of a rational and consistent system of discipline, a form of abuse? The question will ultimately be decided by whether or not spanking tends to produce behavior that makes a person fit in well with the existing system of society. In practice, the word “abuse” tends to be interpreted to include any method of child-rearing that produces behavior inconvenient for the system. Thus, when they go beyond the prevention of obvious, senseless cruelty, programs for preventing “child abuse” are directed toward the control of human behavior on behalf of the system. 149. Presumably, research will continue to increase the effectiveness of psychological techniques for controlling human behavior. But we think it is unlikely that psychological techniques alone will be sufficient to adjust human beings to the kind of society that technology is creating. Biological methods probably will have to be used. We have already mentioned the use of drugs in this connection. Neurology may provide other avenues for modifying the human mind. Genetic engineering of human beings is already beginning to occur in the form of “gene therapy,” and there is no reason to assume that such methods will not eventually be used to modify those aspects of the body that affect mental functioning. 150. As we mentioned in paragraph 134, industrial society seems likely to be entering a period of severe stress, due in part to problems of human behavior and in part to economic and environmental problems. And a considerable proportion of the system’s economic and environmental problems result from the way human beings behave. Alienation, low self-esteem, depression, hostility, rebellion; children who won’t study, youth gangs, illegal drug use, rape, child abuse, other crimes, unsafe sex, teen pregnancy, population growth, political corruption, race hatred, ethnic rivalry, bitter ideological conflict (e.g., pro-choice vs. pro-life), political extremism, terrorism, sabotage, anti-government groups, hate groups. All these threaten the very survival of the system. The system will therefore be FORCED to use every practical means of controlling human behavior. 151. The social disruption that we see today is certainly not the result of mere chance. It can only be a result of the conditions of life that the system imposes on people. (We have argued that the most important of these conditions is disruption of the power process.) If the systems succeeds in imposing sufficient control over human behavior to assure its own survival, a new watershed in human history will have been passed. Whereas formerly the limits of human endurance have imposed limits on the development of societies (as we explained in Paragraphs 143, 144), industrial-technological society will be able to pass those limits by modifying human beings, whether by psychological methods or biological methods or both. In the future, social systems will not be adjusted to suit the needs of human beings. Instead, human being will be adjusted to suit the needs of the system. [27] 152. Generally speaking, technological control over human behavior will probably not be introduced with a totalitarian intention or even through a conscious desire to restrict human freedom. [28] Each new step in the assertion of control over the human mind will be taken as a rational response to a problem that faces society, such as curing alcoholism, reducing the crime rate or inducing young people to study science and engineering. In many cases there will be a humanitarian justification. For example, when a psychiatrist prescribes an antidepressant for a depressed patient, he is clearly doing that individual a favor. It would be inhumane to withhold the drug from someone who needs it. When Parents send their children to Sylvan Learning Centers to have them manipulated into becoming enthusiastic about their studies, they do so from concern for their children’s welfare. It may be that some of these parents wish that one didn’t have to have specialized training to get a job and that their kid didn’t have to be brainwashed into becoming a computer nerd. But what can they do? They can’t change society, and their child may be unemployable if he doesn’t have certain skills. So they send him to Sylvan. 153. Thus control over human behavior will be introduced not by a calculated decision of the authorities but through a process of social evolution (RAPID evolution, however). The process will be impossible to resist, because each advance, considered by itself, will appear to be beneficial, or at least the evil involved in making the advance will appear to be beneficial, or at least the evil involved in making the advance will seem to be less than that which would result from not making it (see paragraph 127). Propaganda for example is used for many good purposes, such as discouraging child abuse or race hatred. [14] Sex education is obviously useful, yet the ef19 fect of sex education (to the extent that it is successful) is to take the shaping of sexual attitudes away from the family and put it into the hands of the state as represented by the public school system. 154. Suppose a biological trait is discovered that increases the likelihood that a child will grow up to be a criminal, and suppose some sort of gene therapy can remove this trait. [29] Of course most parents whose children possess the trait will have them undergo the therapy. It would be inhumane to do otherwise, since the child would probably have a miserable life if he grew up to be a criminal. But many or most primitive societies have a low crime rate in comparison with that of our society, even though they have neither high-tech methods of child-rearing nor harsh systems of punishment. Since there is no reason to suppose that more modern men than primitive men have innate predatory tendencies, the high crime rate of our society must be due to the pressures that modern conditions put on people, to which many cannot or will not adjust. Thus a treatment designed to remove potential criminal tendencies is at least in part a way of re-engineering people so that they suit the requirements of the system. 155. Our society tends to regard as a “sickness” any mode of thought or behavior that is inconvenient for the system, and this is plausible because when an individual doesn’t fit into the system it causes pain to the individual as well as problems for the system. Thus the manipulation of an individual to adjust him to the system is seen as a “cure” for a “sickness” and therefore as good. 156. In paragraph 127 we pointed out that if the use of a new item of technology is INITIALLY optional, it does not necessarily REMAIN optional, because the new technology tends to change society in such a way that it becomes difficult or impossible for an individual to function without using that technology. This applies also to the technology of human behavior. In a world in which most children are put through a program to make them enthusiastic about studying, a parent will almost be forced to put his kid through such a program, because if he does not, then the kid will grow up to be, comparatively speaking, an ignoramus and therefore unemployable. Or suppose a biological treatment is discovered that, without undesirable side-effects, will greatly reduce the psychological stress from which so many people suffer in our society. If large numbers of people choose to undergo the treatment, then the general level of stress in society will be reduced, so that it will be possible for the system to increase the stress-producing pressures. This will lead more people to undergo the treatment; and so forth, so that eventually the pressures may become so heavy that few people will be able to survive without undergoing the stress-reducing treatment. In fact, something like this seems to have happened already with one of our society’s most important psychological tools for enabling people to reduce (or at least temporarily escape from) stress, namely, mass entertainment (see paragraph 147). Our use of mass entertainment is “optional”: No law requires us to watch television, listen to the radio, read magazines. Yet mass entertainment is a means of escape and stress-reduction on which most of us have become dependent. Everyone complains about the trashiness of television, but almost everyone watches it. A few have kicked the TV habit, but it would be a rare person who could get along today without using ANY form of mass entertainment. (Yet until quite recently in human histoy most people got along very nicely with no other entertainment than that which each local community created for itself.) Without the entertainment industry the system probably would not have been able to get away with putting as much stressproducing pressure on us as it does. 157. Assuming that industrial society survives, it is likely that technology will eventually acquire something approaching complete control over human behavior. It has been established beyond any rational doubt that human thought and behavior have a largely biological basis. As experimenters have demonstrated, feelings such as hunger, pleasure, anger and fear can be turned on and off by electrical stimulation of appropriate parts of the brain. Memories can be destroyed by damaging parts of the brain or they can be brought to the surface by electrical stimulation. Hallucinations can be induced or moods changed by drugs. There may or may not be an immaterial human soul, but if there is one it clearly is less powerful that the biological mechanisms of human behavior. For if that were not the case then researchers would not be able so easily to manipulate human feelings and behavior with drugs and electrical currents. 158. It presumably would be impractical for all people to have electrodes inserted in their heads so that they could be controlled by the authorities. But the fact that human thoughts and feelings are so open to biological intervention shows that the problem of controlling human behavior is mainly a technical problem; a problem of neurons, hormones and complex molecules; the kind of problem that is accessible to scientific attack. Given the outstanding record of our society in solving technical problems, it is overwhelmingly probable that great advances will be made in the control of human behavior. 159. Will public resistance prevent the introduction of technological control of human behavior? It certainly would if an attempt were made to introduce such control all at once. But since technological control will be introduced through a long sequence of small advances, there will be no rational and effective public resistance. (See paragraphs 127, 132, 153.) 160. To those who think that all this sounds like science fiction, we point out that yesterday’s science fiction is today’s fact. The Industrial Revolution has radically altered man’s environment and way of life, and it is only to be expected that as technology is increasingly applied to the human body and mind, man himself will be altered as radically as his environment and way of life have been. HUMAN RACE AT A CROSSROADS 161. But we have gotten ahead of our story. It is one thing to develop in the laboratory a series of psychological or biological techniques for manipulating human behavior and quite another to integrate these techniques into a 20 functioning social system. The latter problem is the more difficult of the two. For example, while the techniques of educational psychology doubtless work quite well in the “lab schools” where they are developed, it is not necessarily easy to apply them effectively throughout our educational system. We all know what many of our schools are like. The teachers are too busy taking knives and guns away from the kids to subject them to the latest techniques for making them into computer nerds. Thus, in spite of all its technical advances relating to human behavior, the system to date has not been impressively successful in controlling human beings. The people whose behavior is fairly well under the control of the system are those of the type that might be called “bourgeois.” But there are growing numbers of people who in one way or another are rebels against the system: welfare leaches, youth gangs, cultists, satanists, nazis, radical environmentalists, militiamen, etc. 162. The system is currently engaged in a desperate struggle to overcome certain problems that threaten its survival, among which the problems of human behavior are the most important. If the system succeeds in acquiring sufficient control over human behavior quickly enough, it will probably survive. Otherwise it will break down. We think the issue will most likely be resolved within the next several decades, say 40 to 100 years. 163. Suppose the system survives the crisis of the next several decades. By that time it will have to have solved, or at least brought under control, the principal problems that confront it, in particular that of “socializing” human beings; that is, making people sufficiently docile so that heir behavior no longer threatens the system. That being accomplished, it does not appear that there would be any further obstacle to the development of technology, and it would presumably advance toward its logical conclusion, which is complete control over everything on Earth, including human beings and all other important organisms. The system may become a unitary, monolithic organization, or it may be more or less fragmented and consist of a number of organizations coexisting in a relationship that includes elements of both cooperation and competition, just as today the government, the corporations and other large organizations both cooperate and compete with one another. Human freedom mostly will have vanished, because individuals and small groups will be impotent visa-vis large organizations armed with supertechnology and an arsenal of advanced psychological and biological tools for manipulating human beings, besides instruments of surveillance and physical coercion. Only a small number of people will have any real power, and even these probably will have only very limited freedom, because their behavior too will be regulated; just as today our politicians and corporation executives can retain their positions of power only as long as their behavior remains within certain fairly narrow limits. 164. Don’t imagine that the systems will stop developing further techniques for controlling human beings and nature once the crisis of the next few decades is over and increasing control is no longer necessary for the system’s survival. On the contrary, once the hard times are over the system will increase its control over people and nature more rapidly, because it will no longer be hampered by difficulties of the kind that it is currently experiencing. Survival is not the principal motive for extending control. As we explained in paragraphs 87-90, technicians and scientists carry on their work largely as a surrogate activity; that is, they satisfy their need for power by solving technical problems. They will continue to do this with unabated enthusiasm, and among the most interesting and challenging problems for them to solve will be those of understanding the human body and mind and intervening in their development. For the “good of humanity,” of course. 165. But suppose on the other hand that the stresses of the coming decades prove to be too much for the system. If the system breaks down there may be a period of chaos, a “time of troubles” such as those that history has recorded at various epochs in the past. It is impossible to predict what would emerge from such a time of troubles, but at any rate the human race would be given a new chance. The greatest danger is that industrial society may begin to reconstitute itself within the first few years after the breakdown. Certainly there will be many people (powerhungry types espeeially) who will be anxious to get the factories running again. 166. Therefore two tasks confront those who hate the servitude to which the industrial system is reducing the human race. First, we must work to heighten the social stresses within the system so as to increase the likelihood that it will break down or be weakened sufficiently so that a revolution against it becomes possible. Second, it is necessary to develop and propagate an ideology that opposes technology and the industrial system. Such an ideology can become the basis for a revolution against industrial society if and when the system becomes sufficiently weakened. And such an ideology will help to assure that, if and when industrial society breaks down, its remnants will be smashed beyond repair, so that the system cannot be reconstituted. The factories should be destroyed, technical books burned, etc. HUMAN SUFFERING 167. The industrial system will not break down purely as a result of revolutionary action. It will not be vulnerable to revolutionary attack unless its own internal problems of development lead it into very serious difficulties. So if the system breaks down it will do so either spontaneously, or through a process that is in part spontaneous but helped along by revolutionaries. If the breakdown is sudden, many people will die, since the world’s population has become so overblown that it cannot even feed itself any longer without advanced technology. Even if the breakdown is gradual enough so that reduction of the population can occur more through lowering of the birth rate than through elevation of the death rate, the process of deindustrialization probably will be very chaotic and involve much suffering. It is naive to think it likely that technology can be phased out in a smoothly managed, orderly way, 21 especially since the technophiles will fight stubbornly at every step. Is it therefore cruel to work for the breakdown of the system? Maybe, but maybe not. In the first place, revolutionaries will not be able to break the system down unless it is already in enough trouble so that there would be a good chance of its eventually breaking down by itself anyway; and the bigger the system grows, the more disastrous the consequences of its breakdown will be; so it may be that revolutionaries, by hastening the onset of the breakdown, will be reducing the extent of the disaster. 168. In the second place, one has to balance struggle and death against the loss of freedom and dignity. To many of us, freedom and dignity are more important than a long life or avoidance of physical pain. Besides, we all have to die some time, and it may be better to die fighting for survival, or for a cause, than to live a long but empty and purposeless life. 169. In the third place, it is not at all certain that survival of the system will lead to less suffering than breakdown of the system would. The system has already caused, and is continuing to cause, immense suffering all over the world. Ancient cultures, that for hundreds of years gave people a satisfactory relationship with each other and with their environment, have been shattered by contact with industrial society, and the result has been a whole catalogue of economic, environmental, social and psychological problems. One of the effects of the intrusion of industrial society has been that over much of the world traditional controls on population have been thrown out of balance. Hence the population explosion, with all that that implies. Then there is the psychological suffering that is widespread throughout the supposedly fortunate countries of the West (see paragraphs 44, 45). No one knows what will happen as a result of ozone depletion, the greenhouse effect and other environmental problems that cannot yet be foreseen. And, as nuclear proliferation has shown, new technology cannot be kept out of the hands of dictators and irresponsible Third World nations. Would you like to speculate about what Iraq or North Korea will do with genetic engineering? 170. “Oh!” say the technophiles, “Science is going to fix all that! We will conquer famine, eliminate psychological suffering, make everybody healthy and happy!” Yeah, sure. That’s what they said 200 years ago. The Industrial Revolution was supposed to eliminate poverty, make everybody happy, etc. The actual result has been quite different. The technophiles are hopelessly naive (or selfdeceiving) in their understanding of social problems. They are unaware of (or choose to ignore) the fact that when large changes, even seemingly beneficial ones, are introduced into a society, they lead to a long sequence of other changes, most of which are impossible to predict (paragraph 103). The result is disruption of the society. So it is very probable that in their attempts to end poverty and disease, engineer docile, happy personalities and so forth, the technophiles will create social systems that are terribly troubled, even more so than the present one. For example, the scientists boast that they will end famine by creating new, genetically engineered food plants. But this will allow the human population to keep expanding indefinitely, and it is well known that crowding leads to increased stress and aggression. This is merely one example of the PREDICTABLE problems that will arise. We emphasize that, as past experience has shown, technical progress will lead to other new problems that CANNOT be predicted in advance (paragraph 103). In fact, ever since the Industrial Revolution, technology has been creating new problems for society far more rapidly than it has been solving old ones. Thus it will take a long and difficult period of trial and error for the technophiles to work the bugs out of their Brave New World (if they every do). In the meantime there will be great suffering. So it is not at all clear that the survival of industrial society would involve less suffering than the breakdown of that society would. Technology has gotten the human race into a fix from which there is not likely to be any easy escape. THE FUTURE 171. But suppose now that industrial society does survive the next several decades and that the bugs do eventually get worked out of the system, so that it functions smoothly. What kind of system will it be? We will consider several possibilities. 172. First let us postulate that the computer scientists succeed in developing intelligent machines that can do all things better than human beings can do them. In that case presumably all work will be done by vast, highly organized systems of machines and no human effort will be necessary. Either of two cases might occur. The machines might be permitted to make all of their own decisions without human oversight, or else human control over the machines might be retained. 173. If the machines are permitted to make all their own decisions, we can’t make any conjectures as to the results, because it is impossible to guess how such machines might behave. We only point out that the fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand over all power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no practical choice but to accept all of the machines’ decisions. As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and as machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more and more of their decisions for them, simply because machine-made decisions will bring better results than man-made ones. Eventually a stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in effective control. People won’t be able to just turn the machine off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide. 22 174. On the other hand it is possible that human control over the machines may be retained. In that case the average man may have control over certain private machines of his own, such as his car or his personal computer, but control over large systems of machines will be in the hands of a tiny elite — just as it is today, but with two differences. Due to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous, a useless burden on the system. If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity. If they are humane they may use propaganda or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite. Or, if the elite consists of softhearted liberals, they may decide to play the role of good shepherds to the rest of the human race. They will see to it that everyone’s physical needs are satisfied, that all children are raised under psychologically hygienic conditions, that everyone has a wholesome hobby to keep him busy, and that anyone who may become dissatisfied undergoes “treatment” to cure his “problem.” Of course, life will be so purposeless that people will have to be biologically or psychologically engineered either to remove their need for the power process or to make them “sublimate” their drive for power into some harmless hobby. These engineered human beings may be happy in such a society, but they most certainly will not be free. They will have been reduced to the status of domestic animals. 175. But suppose now that the computer scientists do not succeed in developing artificial intelligence, so that human work remains necessary. Even so, machines will take care of more and more of the simpler tasks so that there will be an increasing surplus of human workers at the lower levels of ability. (We see this happening already. There are many people who find it difficult or impossible to get work, because for intellectual or psychological reasons they cannot acquire the level of training necessary to make themselves useful in the present system.) On those who are employed, ever-increasing demands will be placed: They will need more and more training, more and more ability, and will have to be ever more reliable, conforming and docile, because they will be more and more like cells of a giant organism. Their tasks will be increasingly specialized, so that their work will be, in a sense, out of touch with the real world, being concentrated on one tiny slice of reality. The system will have to use any means that it can, whether psychological or biological, to engineer people to be docile, to have the abilities that the system requires and to “sublimate” their drive for power into some specialized task. But the statement that the people of such a society will have to be docile may require qualification. The society may find competitiveness useful, provided that ways are found of directing competitiveness into channels that serve the needs of the system. We can imagine a future society in which there is endless competition for positions of prestige and power. But no more than a very few people will ever reach the top, where the only real power is (see end of paragraph 163). Very repellent is a society in which a person can satisfy his need for power only by pushing large numbers of other people out of the way and depriving them of THEIR opportunity for power. 176. One can envision scenarios that incorporate aspects of more than one of the possibilities that we have just discussed. For instance, it may be that machines will take over most of the work that is of real, practical importance, but that human beings will be kept busy by being given relatively unimportant work. It has been suggested, for example, that a great development of the service industries might provide work for human beings. Thus people would spent their time shining each other’s shoes, driving each other around in taxicabs, making handicrafts for one another, waiting on each other’s tables, etc. This seems to us a thoroughly contemptible way for the human race to end up, and we doubt that many people would find fulfilling lives in such pointless busy-work. They would seek other, dangerous outlets (drugs, crime, “cults,” hate groups) unless they were biologically or psychologically engineered to adapt them to such a way of life. 177. Needless to say, the scenarios outlined above do not exhaust all the possibilities. They only indicate the kinds of outcomes that seem to us most likely. But we can envision no plausible scenarios that are any more palatable than the ones we’ve just described. It is overwhelmingly probable that if the industrial-technological system survives the next 40 to 100 years, it will by that time have developed certain general characteristics: Individuals (at least those of the “bourgeois” type, who are integrated into the system and make it run, and who therefore have all the power) will be more dependent than ever on large organizations; they will be more “socialized” than ever and their physical and mental qualities to a significant extent (possibly to a very great extent) will be those that are engineered into them rather than being the results of chance (or of God’s will, or whatever); and whatever may be left of wild nature will be reduced to remnants preserved for scientific study and kept under the supervision and management of scientists (hence it will no longer be truly wild). In the long run (say a few centuries from now) it is likely that neither the human race nor any other important organisms will exist as we know them today, because once you start modifying organisms through genetic engineering there is no reason to stop at any particular point, so that the modifications will probably continue until man and other organisms have been utterly transformed. 178. Whatever else may be the case, it is certain that technology is creating for human beings a new physical and social environment radically different from the spectrum of environments to which natural selection has adapted the human race physically and psychologically. If man is not adjusted to this new environment by being artificially re-engineered, then he will be adapted to it through a long and painful process of natural selection. The former is far more likely than the latter. 179. It would be better to dump the whole stinking system and take the consequences. 23 STRATEGY 180. The technophiles are taking us all on an utterly reckless ride into the unknown. Many people understand something of what technological progress is doing to us yet take a passive attitude toward it because they think it is inevitable. But we (FC) don’t think it is inevitable. We think it can be stopped, and we will give here some indications of how to go about stopping it. 181. As we stated in paragraph 166, the two main tasks for the present are to promote social stress and instability in industrial society and to develop and propagate an ideology that opposes technology and the industrial system. When the system becomes sufficiently stressed and unstable, a revolution against technology may be possible. The pattern would be similar to that of the French and Russian Revolutions. French society and Russian society, for several decades prior to their respective revolutions, showed increasing signs of stress and weakness. Meanwhile, ideologies were being developed that offered a new world view that was quite different from the old one. In the Russian case, revolutionaries were actively working to undermine the old order. Then, when the old system was put under sufficient additional stress (by financial crisis in France, by military defeat in Russia) it was swept away by revolution. What we propose is something along the same lines. 182. It will be objected that the French and Russian Revolutions were failures. But most revolutions have two goals. One is to destroy an old form of society and the other is to set up the new form of society envisioned by the revolutionaries. The French and Russian revolutionaries failed (fortunately!) to create the new kind of society of which they dreamed, but they were quite successful in destroying the old society. We have no illusions about the feasibility of creating a new, ideal form of society. Our goal is only to destroy the existing form of society. 183. But an ideology, in order to gain enthusiastic support, must have a positive ideal as well as a negative one; it must be FOR something as well as AGAINST something. The positive ideal that we propose is Nature. That is, WILD nature: those aspects of the functioning of the Earth and its living things that are independent of human management and free of human interference and control. And with wild nature we include human nature, by which we mean those aspects of the functioning of the human individual that are not subject to regulation by organized society but are products of chance, or free will, or God (depending on your religious or philosophical opinions). 184. Nature makes a perfect counter-ideal to technology for several reasons. Nature (that which is outside the power of the system) is the opposite of technology (which seeks to expand indefinitely the power of the system). Most people will agree that nature is beautiful; certainly it has tremendous popular appeal. The radical environmentalists ALREADY hold an ideology that exalts nature and opposes technology. [30] It is not necessary for the sake of nature to set up some chimerical utopia or any new kind of social order. Nature takes care of itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed long before any human society, and for countless centuries many different kinds of human societies coexisted with nature without doing it an excessive amount of damage. Only with the Industrial Revolution did the effect of human society on nature become really devastating. To relieve the pressure on nature it is not necessary to create a special kind of social system, it is only necessary to get rid of industrial society. Granted, this will not solve all problems. Industrial society has already done tremendous damage to nature and it will take a very long time for the scars to heal. Besides, even preindustrial societies can do significant damage to nature. Nevertheless, getting rid of industrial society will accomplish a great deal. It will relieve the worst of the pressure on nature so that the scars can begin to heal. It will remove the capacity of organized society to keep increasing its control over nature (including human nature). Whatever kind of society may exist after the demise of the industrial system, it is certain that most people will live close to nature, because in the absence of advanced technology there is no other way that people CAN live. To feed themselves they must be peasants or herdsmen or fishermen or hunters, etc. And, generally speaking, local autonomy should tend to increase, because lack of advanced technology and rapid communications will limit the capacity of governments or other large organizations to control local communities. 185. As for the negative consequences of eliminating industrial society — well, you can’t eat your cake and have it too. To gain one thing you have to sacrifice another. 186. Most people hate psychological conflict. For this reason they avoid doing any serious thinking about difficult social issues, and they like to have such issues presented to them in simple, black-and-white terms: THIS is all good and THAT is all bad. The revolutionary ideology should therefore be developed on two levels. 187. On the more sophisticated level the ideology should address itself to people who are intelligent, thoughtful and rational. The object should be to create a core of people who will be opposed to the industrial system on a rational, thought-out basis, with full appreciation of the problems and ambiguities involved, and of the price that has to be paid for getting rid of the system. It is particularly important to attract people of this type, as they are capable people and will be instrumental in influencing others. These people should be addressed on as rational a level as possible. Facts should never intentionally be distorted and intemperate language should be avoided. This does not mean that no appeal can be made to the emotions, but in making such appeal care should be taken to avoid misrepresenting the truth or doing anything else that would destroy the intellectual respectability of the ideology. 188. On a second level, the ideology should be propagated in a simplified form that will enable the unthinking majority to see the conflict of technology vs. nature in unambiguous terms. But even on this second level the ideology should not be expressed in language that is so cheap, intemperate or irrational that it alienates people of the thoughfful and rational type. Cheap, intemperate propaganda sometimes achieves impressive short-term gains, 24 but it will be more advantageous in the long run to keep the loyalty of a small number of intelligently committed people than to arouse the passions of an unthinking, fickle mob who will change their attitude as soon as someone comes along with a better propaganda gimmick. However, propaganda of the rabble-rousing type may be necessary when the system is nearing the point of collapse and there is a final struggle between rival ideologies to determine which will become dominant when the old worldview goes under. 189. Prior to that final struggle, the revolutionaries should not expect to have a majority of people on their side. History is made by active, determined minorities, not by the majority, which seldom has a clear and consistent idea of what it really wants. Until the time comes for the final push toward revolution [31], the task of revolutionaries will be less to win the shallow support of the majority than to build a small core of deeply committed people. As for the majority, it will be enough to make them aware of the existence of the new ideology and remind them of it frequently; though of course it will be desirable to get majority support to the extent that this can be done without weakening the core of seriously committed people. 190. Any kind of social conflict helps to destabilize the system, but one should be careful about what kind of conflict one encourages. The line of conflict should be drawn between the mass of the people and the power-holding elite of industrial society (politicians, scientists, upper-level business executives, government officials, etc.). It should NOT be drawn between the revolutionaries and the mass of the people. For example, it would be bad strategy for the revolutionaries to condemn Americans for their habits of consumption. Instead, the average American should be portrayed as a victim of the advertising and marketing industry, which has suckered him into buying a lot of junk that he doesn’t need and that is very poor compensation for his lost freedom. Either approach is consistent with the facts. It is merely a matter of attitude whether you blame the advertising industry for manipulating the public or blame the public for allowing itself to be manipulated. As a matter of strategy one should generally avoid blaming the public. 191. One should think twice before encouraging any other social conflict than that between the power-holding elite (which wields technology) and the general public (over which technology exerts its power). For one thing, other conflicts tend to distract attention from the important conflicts (between power-elite and ordinary people, between technology and nature); for another thing, other conflicts may actually tend to encourage technologization, because each side in such a conflict wants to use technological power to gain advantages over its adversary. This is clearly seen in rivalries between nations. It also appears in ethnic conflicts within nations. For example, in America many black leaders are anxious to gain power for African Americans by placing back individuals in the technological power-elite. They want there to be many black government officials, scientists, corporation executives and so forth. In this way they are helping to absorb the African American subculture into the technological system. Generally speaking, one should encourage only those social conflicts that can be fitted into the framework of the conflicts of power-elite vs. ordinary people, technology vs nature. 192. But the way to discourage ethnic conflict is NOT through militant advocacy of minority rights (see paragraphs 21, 29). Instead, the revolutionaries should emphasize that although minorities do suffer more or less disadvantage, this disadvantage is of peripheral significance. Our real enemy is the industrial- technological system, and in the struggle against the system, ethnic distinctions are of no importance. 193. The kind of revolution we have in mind will not necessarily involve an armed uprising against any government. It may or may not involve physical violence, but it will not be a POLITICAL revolution. Its focus will be on technology and economics, not politics. [32] 194. Probably the revolutionaries should even AVOID assuming political power, whether by legal or illegal means, until the industrial system is stressed to the danger point and has proved itself to be a failure in the eyes of most people. Suppose for example that some “green” party should win control of the United States Congress in an election. In order to avoid betraying or watering down their own ideology they would have to take vigrous measures to turn economic growth into economic shrinkage. To the average man the results would appear disastrous: There would be massive unemployment, shortages of commodities, etc. Even if the grosser ill effects could be avoided through superhumanly skillful management, still people would have to begin giving up the luxuries to which they have become addicted. Dissatisfaction would grow, the “green” party would be voted out o,f offfice and the revolutionaries would have suffered a severe setback. For this reason the revolutionaries should not try to acquire political power until the system has gotten itself into such a mess that any hardships will be seen as resulting from the failures of the industrial system itself and not from the policies of the revolutionaries. The revolution against technology will probably have to be a revolution by outsiders, a revolution from below and not from above. 195. The revolution must be international and worldwide. It cannot be carried out on a nation-by-nation basis. Whenever it is suggested that the United States, for example, should cut back on technological progress or economic growth, people get hysterical and start screaming that if we fall behind in technology the Japanese will get ahead of us. Holy robots! The world will fly off its orbit if the Japanese ever sell more cars than we do! (Nationalism is a great promoter of technology.) More reasonably, it is argued that if the relatively democratic nations of the world fall behind in technology while nasty, dictatorial nations like China, Vietnam and North Korea continue to progress, eventually the dictators may come to dominate the world. That is why the industrial system should be attacked in all nations simultaneously, to the extent that this may be possible. True, there is no assurance that the industrial system can be destroyed at approximately the same time all over the world, and it is 25 even conceivable that the attempt to overthrow the system could lead instead to the domination of the system by dictators. That is a risk that has to be taken. And it is worth taking, since the difference between a “democratic” industrial system and one controlled by dictators is small compared with the difference between an industrial system and a non-industrial one. [33] It might even be argued that an industrial system controlled by dictators would be preferable, because dictator-controlled systems usually have proved ineffficient, hence they are presumably more likely to break down. Look at Cuba. 196. Revolutionaries might consider favoring measures that tend to bind the world economy into a unified whole. Free trade agreements like NAFTA and GATT are probably harmful to the environment in the short run, but in the long run they may perhaps be advantageous because they foster economic interdependence between nations. It will be easier to destroy the industrial system on a worldwide basis if the world economy is so unified that its breakdown in any one major nation will lead to its breakdown in all industrialized nations. 197. Some people take the line that modern man has too much power, too much control over nature; they argue for a more passive attitude on the part of the human race. At best these people are expressing themselves unclearly, because they fail to distinguish between power for LARGE ORGANIZATIONS and power for INDIVIDUALS and SMALL GROUPS. It is a mistake to argue for powerlessness and passivity, because people NEED power. Modern man as a collective entity — that is, the industrial system — has immense power over nature, and we (FC) regard this as evil. But modern INDIVIDUALS and SMALL GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS have far less power than primitive man ever did. Generally speaking, the vast power of “modern man” over nature is exercised not by individuals or small groups but by large organizations. To the extent that the average modern INDIVIDUAL can wield the power of technology, he is permitted to do so only within narrow limits and only under the supervision and control of the system. (You need a license for everything and with the license come rules and regulations.) The individual has only those technological powers with which the system chooses to provide him. His PERSONAL power over nature is slight. 198. Primitive INDIVIDUALS and SMALL GROUPS actually had considerable power over nature; or maybe it would be better to say power WITHIN nature. When primitive man needed food he knew how to find and prepare edible roots, how to track game and take it with homemade weapons. He knew how to protect himself from heat cold, rain, dangerous animals, etc. But primitive man did relatively little damage to nature because the COLLECTIVE power of primitive society was negligible compared to the COLLECTIVE power of industrial society. 199. Instead of arguing for powerlessness and passivity, one should argue that the power of the INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM should be broken, and that this will greatly INCREASE the power and freedom of INDIVIDUALS and SMALL GROUPS. 200. Until the industrial system has been thoroughly wrecked, the destruction of that system must be the revolutionaries’ ONLY goal. Other goals would distract attention and energy from the main goal. More importantly if the revolutionaries permit themselves to have any other goal than the destruction of technology, they will be tempted to use technology as a tool for reaching that other goal. If they give in to that temptation, they will fall right back into the technological trap, because modern technology is a unified, tightly organized system, so that, in order to retain SOME technology, one finds oneself obliged to retain MOST technology, hence one ends up sacrificing only token amounts of technology. 201. Suppose for example that the revolutionaries took “social justice” as a goal. Human nature being what it is, social justice would not come about spontaneously; it would have to be enforced. In order to enforce it the revolutionaries would have to retain central organization and control. For that they would need rapid long-distance transportation and communication, and therefore all the technology needed to support the transportation and communication systems. To feed and clothe poor people they would have to use agricultural and manufacturing technology. And so forth. So that the attempt to insure social justice would force them to retain most parts of the technological system. Not that we have anything against social justice, but it must not be allowed to interfere with the effort to get rid of the technological system. 202. It would be hopeless for revolutionaries to try to attack the system without using SOME modern technology. If nothing else they must use the communications media to spread their message. But they should use modern technology for only ONE purpose: to attack the technological system. 203. Imagine an alcoholic sitting with a barrel of wine in front of him. Suppose he starts saying to himself, “Wine isn’t bad for you if used in moderation. Why, they say small amounts of wine are even good for you! It won’t do me any harm if I take just one little drink....” Well you know what is going to happen. Never forget that the human race with technology is just like an alcoholic with a barrel of wine. 204. Revolutionaries should have as many children as they can. There is strong scientific evidence that social attitudes are to a significant extent inherited. No one suggests that a social attitude is a direct outcome of a person’s genetic constitution, but it appears that personality traits are partly inherited and that certain personality traits tend, within the context of our society, to make a person more likely to hold this or that social attitude. Objections to these findings have been raised, but the objections are feeble and seem to be ideologically motivated. In any event, no one denies that children tend on the average to hold social attitudes similar to those of their parents. From our point of view it doesn’t matter all that much whether the attitudes are passed on genetically or through childhood training. In either case they ARE passed on. 205. The trouble is that many of the people who are inclined to rebel against the industrial system are also concerned about the population problems, hence they are 26 apt to have few or no children. In this way they may be handing the world over to the sort of people who support or at least accept the industrial system. To ensure the strength of the next generation of revolutionaries the present generation should reproduce itself abundantly. In doing so they will be worsening the population problem only slightly. And the important problem is to get rid of the industrial system, because once the industrial system is gone the world’s population necessarily will decrease (see paragraph 167); whereas, if the industrial system survives, it will continue developing new techniques of food production that may enable the world’s population to keep increasing almost indefinitely. 206. With regard to revolutionary strategy, the only points on which we absolutely insist are that the single overriding goal must be the elimination of modern technology, and that no other goal can be allowed to compete with this one. For the rest, revolutionaries should take an empirical approach. If experience indicates that some of the recommendations made in the foregoing paragraphs are not going to give good results, then those recommendations should be discarded. TWO KINDS OF TECHNOLOGY 207. An argument likely to be raised against our proposed revolution is that it is bound to fail, because (it is claimed) throughout history technology has always progressed, never regressed, hence technological regression is impossible. But this claim is false. 208. We distinguish between two kinds of technology, which we will call smallscale technology and organizationdependent technology. Small-scale technology is technology that can be used by small-scale communities without outside assistance. Organization-dependent technology is technology that depends on large-scale social organization. We are aware of no significant cases of regression in small-scale technology. But organizationdependent technology DOES regress when the social organization on which it depends breaks down. Example: When the Roman Empire fell apart the Romans’ smallscale technology survived because any clever village craftsman could build, for instance, a water wheel, any skilled smith could make steel by Roman methods, and so forth. But the Romans’ organization- dependent technology DID regress. Their aqueducts fell into disrepair and were never rebuilt. Their techniques of road construction were lost. The Roman system of urban sanitation was forgotten, so that not until rather recent times did the sanitation of European cities equal that of Ancient Rome. 209. The reason why technology has seemed always to progress is that, until perhaps a century or two before the Industrial Revolution, most technology was small-scale technology. But most of the technology developed since the Industrial Revolution is organization-dependent technology. Take the refrigerator for example. Without factorymade parts or the facilities of a postindustrial machine shop it would be virtually impossible for a handful of local craftsmen to build a refrigerator. If by some miracle they did succeed in building one it would be useless to them without a reliable source of electric power. So they would have to dam a stream and build a generator. Generators require large amounts of copper wire. Imagine trying to make that wire without modern machinery. And where would they get a gas suitable for refrigeration? It would be much easier to build an icehouse or preserve food by drying or picking, as was done before the invention of the refrigerator. 210. So it is clear that if the industrial system were once thoroughly broken down, refrigeration technology would quickly be lost. The same is true of other organizationdependent technology. And once this technology had been lost for a generation or so it would take centuries to rebuild it, just as it took centuries to build it the first time around. Surviving technical books would be few and scattered. An industrial society, if built from scratch without outside help, can only be built in a series of stages: You need tools to make tools to make tools to make tools... A long process of economic development and progress in social organization is required. And, even in the absence of an ideology opposed to technology, there is no reason to believe that anyone would be interested in rebuilding industrial society. The enthusiasm for “progress” is a phenomenon peculiar to the modern form of society, and it seems not to have existed prior to the 17th century or thereabouts. 211. In the late Middle Ages there were four main civilizations that were about equally “advanced”: Europe, the Islamic world, India, and the Far East (China, Japan, Korea). Three of those civilizations remained more or less stable, and only Europe became dynamic. No one knows why Europe became dynamic at that time; historians have their theories but these are only speculation. At any rate, it is clear that rapid development toward a technological form of society occurs only under special conditions. So there is no reason to assume that a long-lasting technological regression cannot be brought about. 212. Would society EVENTUALLY develop again toward an industrial-technological form? Maybe, but there is no use in worrying about it, since we can’t predict or control events 500 or 1,000 years in the future. Those problems must be dealt with by the people who will live at that time. THE DANGER OF LEFTISM 213. Because of their need for rebellion and for membership in a movement, leftists or persons of similar psychological type often are unattracted to a rebellious or activist movement whose goals and membership are not initially leftist. The resulting influx of leftish types can easily turn a non-leftist movement into a leftist one, so that leftist goals replace or distort the original goals of the movement. 214. To avoid this, a movement that exalts nature and opposes technology must take a resolutely anti-leftist 27 stance and must avoid all collaboration with leftists. Leftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology. Leftism is collectivist; it seeks to bind together the entire world (both nature and the human race) into a unified whole. But this implies management of nature and of human life by organized society, and it requires advanced technology. You can’t have a united world without rapid transportation and communication, you can’t make all people love one another without sophisticated psychological techniques, you can’t have a “planned society” without the necessary technological base. Above all, leftism is driven by the need for power, and the leftist seeks power on a collective basis, through identification with a mass movement or an organization. Leftism is unlikely ever to give up technology, because technology is too valuable a source of collective power. 215. The anarchist [34] too seeks power, but he seeks it on an individual or small-group basis; he wants individuals and small groups to be able to control the circumstances of their own lives. He opposes technology because it makes small groups dependent on large organizations. 216. Some leftists may seem to oppose technology, but they will oppose it only so long as they are outsiders and the technological system is controlled by non-leftists. If leftism ever becomes dominant in society, so that the technological system becomes a tool in the hands of leftists, they will enthusiastically use it and promote its growth. In doing this they will be repeating a pattern that leftism has shown again and again in the past. When the Bolsheviks in Russia were outsiders, they vigorously opposed censorship and the secret police, they advocated self-determination for ethnic minorities, and so forth; but as soon as they came into power themselves, they imposed a tighter censorship and created a more ruthless secret police than any that had existed under the tsars, and they oppressed ethnic minorities at least as much as the tsars had done. In the United States, a couple of decades ago when leftists were a minority in our universities, leftist professors were vigorous proponents of academic freedom, but today, in those of our universities where leftists have become dominant, they have shown themselves ready to take away from everyone else’s academic freedom. (This is “political correctness.”) The same will happen with leftists and technology: They will use it to oppress everyone else if they ever get it under their own control. 217. In earlier revolutions, leftists of the most powerhungry type, repeatedly, have first cooperated with nonleftist revolutionaries, as well as with leftists of a more libertarian inclination, and later have double-crossed them to seize power for themselves. Robespierre did this in the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks did it in the Russian Revolution, the communists did it in Spain in 1938 and Castro and his followers did it in Cuba. Given the past history of leftism, it would be utterly foolish for non-leftist revolutionaries today to collaborate with leftists. 218. Various thinkers have pointed out that leftism is a kind of religion. Leftism is not a religion in the strict sense because leftist doctrine does not postulate the existence of any supernatural being. But, for the leftist, leftism plays a psychological role much like that which religion plays for some people. The leftist NEEDS to believe in leftism; it plays a vital role in his psychological economy. His beliefs are not easily modified by logic or facts. He has a deep conviction that leftism is morally Right with a capital R, and that he has not only a right but a duty to impose leftist morality on everyone. (However, many of the people we are referring to as “leftists” do not think of themselves as leftists and would not describe their system of beliefs as leftism. We use the term “leftism” because we don’t know of any better words to designate the spectrum of related creeds that includes the feminist, gay rights, political correctness, etc., movements, and because these movements have a strong affinity with the old left. See paragraphs 227-230.) 219. Leftism is a totalitarian force. Wherever leftism is in a position of power it tends to invade every private corner and force every thought into a leftist mold. In part this is because of the quasi-religious character of leftism: everything contrary to leftist beliefs represents Sin. More importantly, leftism is a totalitarian force because of the leftists’ drive for power. The leftist seeks to satisfy his need for power through identification with a social movement and he tries to go through the power process by helping to pursue and attain the goals of the movement (see paragraph 83). But no matter how far the movement has gone in attaining its goals the leftist is never satisfied, because his activism is a surrogate activity (see paragraph 41). That is, the leftist’s real motive is not to attain the ostensible goals of leftism; in reality he is motivated by the sense of power he gets from struggling for and then reaching a social goal. [35] Consequently the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal. The leftist wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And as long as anyone harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on. It’s not enough that the public should be informed about the hazards of smoking; a warning has to be stamped on every package of cigarettes. Then cigarette advertising has to be restricted if not banned. The activists will never be satisfied until tobacco is outlawed, and after that it will be alcohol, then junk food, etc. Activists have fought gross child abuse, which is reasonable. But now they want to stop all spanking. When they have done that they will want to ban something else they consider unwholesome, then another thing and then another. They will never be satisfied until they have complete control over all child rearing practices. And then they will move on to another cause. 220. Suppose you asked leftists to make a list of ALL the things that were wrong with society, and then suppose you instituted EVERY social change that they demanded. It is safe to say that within a couple of years the majority of leftists would find something new to complain about, 28 some new social “evil” to correct; because, once again, the leftist is motivated less by distress at society’s ills than by the need to satisfy his drive for power by imposing his solutions on society. 221. Because of the restrictions placed on their thoughts and behavior by their high level of socialization, many leftists of the over-socialized type cannot pursue power in the ways that other people do. For them the drive for power has only one morally acceptable outlet, and that is in the struggle to impose their morality on everyone. 222. Leftists, especially those of the oversocialized type, are True Believers in the sense of Eric Hoffer’s book, The True Believer. But not all True Believers are of the same psychological type as leftists. Presumably a true-believing nazi, for instance, is very different psychologically from a true-believing leftist. Because of their capacity for singleminded devotion to a cause, True Believers are a useful, perhaps a necessary, ingredient of any revolutionary movement. This presents a problem with which we must admit we don’t know how to deal. We aren’t sure how to harness the energies of the True Believer to a revolution against technology. At present all we can say is that no True Believer will make a safe recruit to the revolution unless his commitment is exclusively to the destruction of technology. If he is committed also to another ideal, he may want to use technology as a tool for pursuing that other ideal (see paragraphs 200, 201). 223. Some readers may say, “This stuff about leftism is a lot of crap. I know John and Jane who are leftish types and they don’t have all these totalitarian tendencies.” It’s quite true that many leftists, possibly even a numerical majority, are decent people who sincerely believe in tolerating others’ values (up to a point) and wouldn’t want to use high-handed methods to reach their social goals. Our remarks about leftism are not meant to apply to every individual leftist but to describe the general character of leftism as a movement. And the general character of a movement is not necessarily determined by the numerical proportions of the various kinds of people involved in the movement. 224. The people who rise to positions of power in leftist movements tend to be leftists of the most power-hungry type, because power-hungry people are those who strive hardest to get into positions of power. Once the powerhungry types have captured control of the movement, there are many leftists of a gentler breed who inwardly disapprove of many of the actions of the leaders, but cannot bring themselves to oppose them. They NEED their faith in the movement, and because they cannot give up this faith they go along with the leaders. True, SOME leftists do have the guts to oppose the totalitarian tendencies that emerge, but they generally lose, because the powerhungry types are better organized, are more ruthless and Machiavellian and have taken care to build themselves a strong power base. 225. These phenomena appeared clearly in Russia and other countries that were taken over by leftists. Similarly, before the breakdown of communism in the, USSR, leftish types in the West would, seldom criticize that country. If prodded they would admit that the USSR did many wrong things, but then they would try to find excuses for the communists and begin talking about the faults of the West. They always opposed Western military resistance to communist aggression. Leftish types all over the world vigorously protested the U.S. military action in Vietnam, but when the USSR invaded Afghanistan they did nothing. Not that they approved of the Soviet actions; but because of their leftist faith, they just couldn’t bear to put themselves in opposition to communism. Today, in those of our universities where “political correctness” has become dominant, there are probably many leftish types who privately disapprove of the suppression of academic freedom, but they go along with it anyway. 226. Thus the fact that many individual leftists are personally mild and fairly tolerant people by no means prevents leftism as a whole form having a totalitarian tendency. 227. Our discussion of leftism has a serious weakness. It is still far from clear what we mean by the word “leftist.” There doesn’t seem to be much we can do about this. Today leftism is fragmented into a whole spectrum of activist movements. Yet not all activist movements are leftist, and some activist movements (e.g., radical environmentalism) seem to include both personalities of the leftist type and personalities of thoroughly un-leftist types who ought to know better than to collaborate with leftists. Varieties of leftists fade out gradually into varieties of non-leftists and we ourselves would often be hard-pressed to decide whether a given individual is or is not a leftist. To the extent that it is defined at all, our conception of leftism is defined by the discussion of it that we have given in this article, and we can only advise the reader to use his own judgment in deciding who is a leftist. 228. But it will be helpful to list some criteria for diagnosing leftism. These criteria cannot be applied in a cut and dried manner. Some individuals may meet some of the criteria without being leftists, some leftists may not meet any of the criteria. Again, you just have to use your judgment. 229. The leftist is oriented toward large-scale collectivism. He emphasizes the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. He has a negative attitude toward individualism. He often takes a moralistic tone. He tends to be for gun control, for sex education and other psychologically “enlightened” educational methods, for social planning, for affirmative action, for multiculturalism. He tends to identify with victims. He tends to be against competition and against violence, but he ofte finds excuses for those leftists who do commit violence. He is fond of using the common catch-phrases of the left, like “racism,” “sexism,” “homophobia,” “capitalism,” “imperialism,” “neocolonialism,” “genocide,” “social change,” “social justice,” “social responsibility.” Maybe the best diagnostic trait of the leftist is his tendency to sympathize with the following movements: feminism, gay rights, ethnic rights, disability rights, animal rights, political correctness. Anyone who strongly sympathizes with ALL of these movements is almost certainly a leftist. [36] 230. The more dangerous leftists, that is, those who 29 are most power-hungry, are often characterized by arrogance or by a dogmatic approach to ideology. However, the most dangerous leftists of all may be certain oversocialized types who avoid irritating displays of aggressiveness and refrain from advertising their leftism, but work quietly and unobtrusively to promote collectivist values, “enlightened” psychological techniques for socializing children, dependence of the individual on the system, and so forth. These crypto-leftists (as we may call them) approximate certain bourgeois types as far as practical action is concerned, but differ from them in psychology, ideology and motivation. The ordinary bourgeois tries to bring people under control of the system in order to protect his way of life, or he does so simply because his attitudes are conventional. The crypto-leftist tries to bring people under control of the system because he is a True Believer in a collectivistic ideology. The crypto-leftist is differentiated from the average leftist of the oversocialized type by the fact that his rebellious impulse is weaker and he is more securely socialized. He is differentiated from the ordinary well-socialized bourgeois by the fact that there is some deep lack within him that makes it necessary for him to devote himself to a cause and immerse himself in a collectivity. And maybe his (well-sublimated) drive for power is stronger than that of the average bourgeois. FINAL NOTE 231. Throughout this article we’ve made imprecise statements and statements that ought to have had all sorts of qualifications and reservations attached to them; and some of our statements may be flatly false. Lack of sufficient information and the need for brevity made it impossible for us to formulate our assertions more precisely or add all the necessary qualifications. And of course in a discussion of this kind one must rely heavily on intuitive judgment, and that can sometimes be wrong. So we don’t claim that this article expresses more than a crude approximation to the truth. 232. All the same, we are reasonably confident that the general outlines of the picture we have painted here are roughly correct. Just one possible weak point needs to be mentioned. We have portrayed leftism in its modern form as a phenomenon peculiar to our time and as a symptom of the disruption of the power process. But we might possibly be wrong about this. Oversocialized types who try to satisfy their drive for power by imposing their morality on everyone have certainly been around for a long time. But we THINK that the decisive role played by feelings of inferiority, low self-esteem, powerlessness, identification with victims by people who are not themselves victims, is a peculiarity of modern leftism. Identification with victims by people not themselves victims can be seen to some extent in 19th century leftism and early Christianity, but as far as we can make out, symptoms of low self-esteem, etc., were not nearly so evident in these movements, or in any other movements, as they are in modern leftism. But we are not in a position to assert confidently that no such movements have existed prior to modern leftism. This is a significant question to which historians ought to give their attention. NOTES 1. (Paragraph 19) We are asserting that ALL, or even most, bullies and ruthless competitors suffer from feelings of inferiority. 2. (Paragraph 25) During the Victorian period many oversocialized people suffered from serious psychological problems as a result of repressing or trying to repress their sexual feelings. Freud apparently based his theories on people of this type. Today the focus of socialization has shifted from sex to aggression. 3. (Paragraph 27) Not necessarily including specialists in engineering or the “hard” sciences. 4. (Paragraph 28) There are many individuals of the middle and upper classes who resist some of these values, but usually their resistance is more or less covert. Such resistance appears in the mass media only to a very limited extent. The main thrust of propaganda in our society is in favor of the stated values. The main reason why these values have become, so to speak, the official values of our society is that they are useful to the industrial system. Violence is discouraged because it disrupts the functioning of the system. Racism is discouraged because ethnic conflicts also disrupt the system, and discrimination wastes the talents of minority-group members who could be useful to the system. Poverty must be “cured” because the underclass causes problems for the system and contact with the underclass lowers the morale of the other classes. Women are encouraged to have careers because their talents are useful to the system and, more importantly, because by having regular jobs women become better integrated into the system and tied directly to it rather than to their families. This helps to weaken family solidarity. (The leaders of the system say they want to strengthen the family, but they really mean is that they want the family to serve as an effective tool for socializing children in accord with the needs of the system. We argue in paragraphs 51, 52 that the system cannot afford to let the family or other smallscale social groups be strong or autonomous.) 5. (Paragraph 42) It may be argued that the majority of people don’t want to make their own decisions but want leaders to do their thinking for them. There is an element of truth in this. People like to make their own decisions in small matters, but making decisions on difficult, fundamental questions requires facing up to psychological conflict, and most people hate psychological conflict. Hence they tend to lean on others in making difficult decisions. But it does not follow that they like to have decisions imposed upon them without having any opportunity to influence those decisions. The majority of people are natural followers, not leaders, but they like to have direct personal access to their leaders, they want to be able to influence the leaders and participate to some extent in making even the difficult decisions. At least to that degree they need autonomy. 30 6. (Paragraph 44) Some of the symptoms listed are similar to those shown by caged animals. To explain how these symptoms arise from deprivation with respect to the power process: common-sense understanding of human nature tells one that lack of goals whose attainment requires effort leads to boredom and that boredom, long continued, often leads eventually to depression. Failure to attain goals leads to frustration and lowering of selfesteem. Frustration leads to anger, anger to aggression, often in the form of spouse or child abuse. It has been shown that long-continued frustration commonly leads to depression and that depression tends to cause guilt, sleep disorders, eating disorders and bad feelings about oneself. Those who are tending toward depression seek pleasure as an antidote; hence insatiable hedonism and excessive sex, with perversions as a means of getting new kicks. Boredom too tends to cause excessive pleasure-seeking since, lacking other goals, people often use pleasure as a goal. The foregoing is a simplification. Reality is more complex, and of course, deprivation with respect to the power process is not the ONLY cause of the symptoms described. By the way, when we mention depression we do not necessarily mean depression that is severe enough to be treated by a psychiatrist. Often only mild forms of depression are involved. And when we speak of goals we do not necessarily mean long-term, thought-out goals. For many or most people through much of human history, the goals of a hand-to-mouth existence (merely providing oneself and one’s family with food from day to day) have been quite sufficient. 7. (Paragraph 52) A partial exception may be made for a few passive, inwardlooking groups, such as the Amish, which have little effect on the wider society. Apart from these, some genuine small-scale communities do exist in America today. For instance, youth gangs and “cults.” Everyone regards them as dangerous, and so they are, because the members of these groups are loyal primarily to one another rather than to the system, hence the system cannot control them. Or take the gypsies. The gypsies commonly get away with theft and fraud because their loyalties are such that they can always get other gypsies to give testimony that “proves” their innocence. Obviously the system would be in serious trouble if too many people belonged to such groups. Some of the early-20th century Chinese thinkers who were concerned with modernizing China recognized the necessity breaking down small-scale social groups such as the family: “(According to Sun Yatsen) the Chinese people needed a new surge of patriotism, which would lead to a transfer of loyalty from the family to the state.... (According to Li Huang) traditional attachments, particularly to the family had to be abandoned if nationalism were to develop in China.” (Chester C. Tan, “Chinese Political Thought in the Twentieth Century,” page 125, page 297.) 8. (Paragraph 56) Yes, we know that 19th century America had its problems, and serious ones, but for the sake of brevity we have to express ourselves in simplified terms. 9. (Paragraph 61) We leave aside the “underclass.” We are speaking of the mainstream. 10. (Paragraph 62) Some social scientists, educators, “mental health” professionals and the like are doing their best to push the social drives into group 1 by trying to see to it that everyone has a satisfactory social life. 11. (Paragraphs 63, 82) Is the drive for endless material acquisition really an artificial creation of the advertising and marketing industry? Certainly there is no innate human drive for material acquisition. There have been many cultures in which people have desired little material wealth beyond what was necessary to satisfy their basic physical needs (Australian aborigines, traditional Mexican peasant culture, some African cultures). On the other hand there have also been many pre-industrial cultures in which material acquisition has played an important role. So we can’t claim that today’s acquisition-oriented culture is exclusively a creation of the advertising and marketing industry. But it is clear that the advertising and marketing industry has had an important part in creating that culture. The big corporations that spend millions on advertising wouldn’t be spending that kind of money without solid proof that they were getting it back in increased sales. One member of FC met a sales manager a couple of years ago who was frank enough to tell him, “Our job is to make people buy things they don’t want and don’t need.” He then described how an untrained novice could present people with the facts about a product, and make no sales at all, while a trained and experienced professional salesman would make lots of sales to the same people. This shows that people are manipulated into buying things they don’t really want. 12. (Paragraph 64) The problem of purposelessness seems to have become less serious during the last 15 years or so, because people now feel less secure physically and economically than they did earlier, and the need for security provides them with a goal. But purposelessness has been replaced by frustration over the difficulty of attaining security. We emphasize the problem of purposelessness because the liberals and leftists would wish to solve our social problems by having society guarantee everyone’s security; but if that could be done it would only bring back the problem of purposelessness. The real issue is not whether society provides well or poorly for people’s security; the trouble is that people are dependent on the system for their security rather than having it in their own hands. This, by the way, is part of the reason why some people get worked up about the right to bear arms; possession of a gun puts that aspect of their security in their own hands. 13. (Paragraph 66) Conservatives’ efforts to decrease the amount of government regulation are of little benefit to the average man. For one thing, only a fraction of the regulations can be eliminated because most regulations are necessary. For another thing, most of the deregulation affects business rather than the average individual, so that its main effect is to take power from the government and give it to private corporations. What this means for the average man is that government interference in his life is replaced by interference from big corporations, which may be permitted, for example, to dump more chemicals that get into his water supply and give him cancer. The conservatives are just taking the average man for a sucker, 31 exploiting his resentment of Big Government to promote the power of Big Business. 14. (Paragraph 73) When someone approves of the purpose for which propaganda is being used in a given case, he generally calls it “education” or applies to it some similar euphemism. But propaganda is propaganda regardless of the purpose for which it is used. 15. (Paragraph 83) We are not expressing approval or disapproval of the Panama invasion. We only use it to illustrate a point. 16. (Paragraph 95) When the American colonies were under British rule there were fewer and less effective legal guarantees of freedom than there were after the American Constitution went into effect, yet there was more personal freedom in pre-industrial America, both before and after the War of Independence, than there was after the Industrial Revolution took hold in this country. We quote from “Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives,” edited by Hugh Davis Graham and Ted Robert Gurr, Chapter 12 by Roger Lane, pages 476-478: “The progressive heightening of standards of propriety, and with it the increasing reliance on official law enforcement (in l9th century America)... were common to the whole society.... [T]he change in social behavior is so long term and so widespread as to suggest a connection with the most fundamental of contemporary social processes; that of industrial urbanization itself.... Massachusetts in 1835 had a population of some 660,940, 81 percent rural, overwhelmingly preindustrial and native born. It’s citizens were used to considerable personal freedom. Whether teamsters, farmers or artisans, they were all accustomed to setting their own schedules, and the nature of their work made them physically independent of each other.... Individual problems, sins or even crimes, were not generally cause for wider social concern...."But the impact of the twin movements to the city and to the factory, both just gathering force in 1835, had a progressive effect on personal behavior throughout the 19th century and into the 20th. The factory demanded regularity of behavior, a life governed by obedience to the rhythms of clock and calendar, the demands of foreman and supervisor. In the city or town, the needs of living in closely packed neighborhoods inhibited many actions previously unobjectionable. Both blue- and white-collar employees in larger establishments were mutually dependent on their fellows; as one man’s work fit into anther’s, so one man’s business was no longer his own. The results of the new organization of life and work were apparent by 1900, when some 76 percent of the 2,805,346 inhabitants of Massachusetts were classified as urbanites. Much violent or irregular behavior which had been tolerable in a casual, independent society was no longer acceptable in the more formalized, cooperative atmosphere of the later period.... The move to the cities had, in short, produced a more tractable, more socialized, more ’civilized’ generation than its predecessors.” 17. (Paragraph 117) Apologists for the system are fond of citing cases in which elections have been decided by one or two votes, but such cases are rare. 18. (Paragraph 119) “Today, in technologically advanced lands, men live very similar lives in spite of geographical, religious, and political differences. The daily lives of a Christian bank clerk in Chicago, a Buddhist bank clerk in Tokyo, and a Communist bank clerk in Moscow are far more alike than the life of any one of them is like that of any single man who lived a thousand years ago. These similarities are the result of a common technology....” L. Sprague de Camp, “The Ancient Engineers,” Ballantine edition, page 17. The lives of the three bank clerks are not IDENTICAL. Ideology does have SOME effect. But all technological societies, in order to survive, must evolve along APPROXIMATELY the same trajectory. 19. (Paragraph 123) Just think an irresponsible genetic engineer might create a lot of terrorists. 20. (Paragraph 124) For a further example of undesirable consequences of medical progress, suppose a reliable cure for cancer is discovered. Even if the treatment is too expensive to be available to any but the elite, it will greatly reduce their incentive to stop the escape of carcinogens into the environment. 21. (Paragraph 128) Since many people may find paradoxical the notion that a large number of good things can add up to a bad thing, we illustrate with an analogy. Suppose Mr. A is playing chess with Mr. B. Mr. C, a Grand Master, is looking over Mr. A’s shoulder. Mr. A of course wants to win his game, so if Mr. C points out a good move for him to make, he is doing Mr. A a favor. But suppose now that Mr. C tells Mr. A how to make ALL of his moves. In each particular instance he does Mr. A a favor by showing him his best move, but by making ALL of his moves for him he spoils his game, since there is not point in Mr. A’s playing the game at all if someone else makes all his moves. The situation of modern man is analogous to that of Mr. A. The system makes an individual’s life easier for him in innumerable ways, but in doing so it deprives him of control over his own fate. 22. (Paragraph 137) Here we are considering only the conflict of values within the mainstream. For the sake of simplicity we leave out of the picture “outsider” values like the idea that wild nature is more important than human economic welfare. 23. (Paragraph 137) Self-interest is not necessarily MATERIAL self-interest. It can consist in fulfillment of some psychological need, for example, by promoting one’s own ideology or religion. 24. (Paragraph 139) A qualification: It is in the interest of the system to permit a certain prescribed degree of freedom in some areas. For example, economic freedom (with suitable limitations and restraints) has proved effective in promoting economic growth. But only planned, circumscribed, limited freedom is in the interest of the system. The individual must always be kept on a leash, even if the leash is sometimes long (see paragraphs 94, 97). 25. (Paragraph 143) We don’t mean to suggest that the efficiency or the potential for survival of a society has always been inversely proportional to the amount of pressure or discomfort to which the society subjects people. That certainly is not the case. There is good reason to believe that many primitive societies subjected people to less pressure than European society did, but European society 32 proved far more efficient than any primitive society and always won out in conflicts with such societies because of the advantages conferred by technology. 26. (Paragraph 147) If you think that more effective law enforcement is unequivocally good because it suppresses crime, then remember that crime as defined by the system is not necessarily what YOU would call crime. Today, smoking marijuana is a “crime,” and, in some places in the U.S., so is possession of an unregistered handgun. Tomorrow, possession of ANY firearm, registered or not, may be made a crime, and the same thing may happen with disapproved methods of child-rearing, such as spanking. In some countries, expression of dissident political opinions is a crime, and there is no certainty that this will never happen in the U.S., since no constitution or political system lasts forever. If a society needs a large, powerful law enforcement establishment, then there is something gravely wrong with that society; it must be subjecting people to severe pressures if so many refuse to follow the rules, or follow them only because forced. Many societies in the past have gotten by with little or no formal law-enforcement. 27. (Paragraph 151) To be sure, past societies have had means of influencing human behavior, but these have been primitive and of low effectiveness compared with the technological means that are now being developed. 28. (Paragraph 152) However, some psychologists have publicly expressed opinions indicating their contempt for human freedom. And the mathematician Claude Shannon was quoted in Omni (August 1987) as saying, “I visualize a time when we will be to robots what dogs are to humans, and I’m rooting for the machines.” 29. (Paragraph 154) This is no science fiction! After writing paragraph 154 we came across an article in Scientific American according to which scientists are actively developing techniques for identffying possible future criminals and for treating them by a combination of biological and psychological means. Some scientists advocate compulsory application of the treatment, which may be available in the near future. (See “Seeking the Criminal Element,” by W. Wayt Gibbs, Scientific American, March 1995.) Maybe you think this is okay because the treatment would be applied to those who might become violent criminals. But of course it won’t stop there. Next, a treatment will be applied to those who might become drunk drivers (they endanger human life too), then perhaps to peel who spank their children, then to environmentalists who sabotage logging equipment, eventually to anyone whose behavior is inconvenient for the system. 30. (Paragraph 184) A further advantage of nature as a counter-ideal to technology is that, in many people, nature inspires the kind of reverence that is associated with religion, so that nature could perhaps be idealized on a religious basis. It is true that in many societies religion has served as a support and justification for the established order, but it is also true that religion has often provided a basis for rebellion. Thus it may be useful to introduce a religious element into the rebellion against technology, the more so because Western society today has no strong religious foundation. Religion, nowadays either is used as cheap and transparent support for narrow, short-sighted selfishness (some conservatives use it this way), or even is cynically exploited to make easy money (by many evangelists), or has degenerated into crude irrationalism (fundamentalist protestant sects, “cults”), or is simply stagnant (Catholicism, main-line Protestantism). The nearest thing to a strong, widespread, dynamic religion that the West has seen in recent times has been the quasi-religion of leftism, but leftism today is fragmented and has no clear, unified, inspiring goal. Thus there is a religious vacuum in our society that could perhaps be filled by a religion focused on nature in opposition to technology. But it would be a mistake to try to concoct artificially a religion to fill this role. Such an invented religion would probably be a failure. Take the “Gaia” religion for example. Do its adherents REALLY believe in it or are they just play-acting? If they are just play-acting their religion will be a flop in the end. It is probably best not to try to introduce religion into the conflict of nature vs. technology unless you REALLY believe in that religion yourself and find that it arouses a deep, strong, genuine response in many other people. 31. (Paragraph 189) Assuming that such a final push occurs. Conceivably the industrial system might be eliminated in a somewhat gradual or piecemeal fashion (see paragraphs 4, 167 and Note 32). 32. (Paragraph 193) It is even conceivable (remotely) that the revolution might consist only of a massive change of attitudes toward technology resulting in a relatively gradual and painless disintegration of the industrial system. But if this happens we’ll be very lucky. It’s far more probably that the transition to a nontechnological society will be very difficult and full of conflicts and disasters. 33. (Paragraph 195) The economic and technological structure of a society are far more important than its political structure in determining the way the average man lives (see paragraphs 95, 119 and Notes 16, 18). 34. (Paragraph 215) This statement refers to our particular brand of anarchism. A wide variety of social attitudes have been called “anarchist,” and it may be that many who consider themselves anarchists would not accept our statement of paragraph 215. It should be noted, by the way, that there is a nonviolent anarchist movement whose members probably would not accept FC as anarchist and certainly would not approve of FC’s violent methods. 35. (Paragraph 219) Many leftists are motivated also by hostility, but the hostility probably results in part from a frustrated need for power. 36. (Paragraph 229) It is important to understand that we mean someone who sympathizes with these movements as they exist today in our society. One who believes that women, homosexuals, etc., should have equal rights is not necessary a leftist. The feminist, gay rights, etc., movements that exist in our society have the particular ideological tone that characterizes leftism, and if one believes, for example, that women should have equal rights it does not necessarily follow that one must sympathize with the feminist movement as it exists today. c 1995 Hache et les auteurs sauf indication contraire http://editions-hache.com/



BELOW: MENTAL PEACE TO TED , TILL HE DIES !   

FOR HIS TORMENTORS, NO REM SLEEP TILL THEY DIE  !!


BELOW: THIS GERMAN JEWISH BASTARD, AN AGENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD  IS NO 17 IN MY GARBAGE BUCKET LIST.. 

HIS UNCLE WAS MAD BASTARD SIGMUND FREUD ( MOOLADHARA CHAKRA CORRUPTION EXPERT ) WHO IS NO 3 IN VADAKAYILs GARBAGE BUCKET



  1. TODAY--

    TWO NEW PEOPLE MK GANDHI AND SONIA GANDHI ARE FLUSHED DOWN THE SHITHOLE


    GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:

    1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
    2 NOAM CHOMSKY
    3 SIGMUND FREUD
    4) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
    5) AMARTYA SEN
    6) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
    7) IMMANUEL KANT
    8 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
    9) ALBERT EINSTEIN
    10) ISAAC NEWTON
    11) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
    12) CHARLES DARWIN
    13) KARL MARX
    14) MAX WEBER
    15) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
    16) FIBONACCI
    17) EDWARD BERNAYS
    18) JOHN DEWEY
    19) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
    20 PETER D OUPENSKY
    21) OPRAH WINFREY
    22) RICHARD BANDLER AND JOHN GRINDER
    23) CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
    24) STEPHEN HAWKING
    25) SIDNEY HOOK
    26) ALFRED KINSEY
    27) BARACK OBAMA
    28) AYN RAND
    29) WILHELM WUNDT
    30) RENE DESCARTES.
    31) EMPRESS HELENA
    32) RAYMOND IV
    33) SAINT MOTHER TERESA

    ########################

    BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “

    1) NIKOLA TESLA
    2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
    3) IE IRODOV
    4) ARYABHATTA ( 2700 BC)
    5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
    6) CHANAKYA ( 372 BC )
    7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA ( 2000 BC )
    8) APOLLONIUS OF TYANA ( KERALA SAGE WHOSE LEGACY WAS USURPED BY COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )
    9) "JOHN DOE"
    10) JULIAN ASSANGE
    11) SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA
    12) GARY STEPHEN WEBB
    13) GEORGE ORWELL.
    13) CESAR MILLAN
    14) HENRY FORD.
    15) PANINI ( 5500 BC )
    16) BHARTRHARI ( 7000 BC )
    17) PATANJALI ( 5000 BC )
    18) MANU (8300 BC)
    19) YASKA ( 5800 BC )
    20) JOHN CARMAC
    21) QUEEN DIDO ( 1600 BC )
    22) KANADA MUNI ( 6500 BC )
    23) VARAHAMIHIRA ( 2660 BC )
    24) VARARUCHI ( 2830 BC )
    25) VIROCHANA ( 10, 650 BC )
    26) MAHABALI ( 10,600 BC )
    27) KALANAMI ( 10500 BC )
    28) IMHOTEP / AYYAPPA ( 3900 BC )
    29) PROF HYPATIA
    30) SWARBANU
    31) PUTIN
    32) EDWARD SNOWDEN


    CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----

    1) SUHEL SETH
    2) PRITISH NANDI
    3) DILIP CHERIAN
    4) PRANNOY JAMES ROY
    5) AROON PURIE
    6) VINEET JAIN
    7) SHEKHAR GUPTA
    8) SAGARIKA GHOSE AND HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI
    9) SHOBHAA DE
    10) SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN AND WIFE NANDINI SUNDAR
    11) KAMALHAASAN
    12) AUDREY TRUSCHKE
    13) NOSTRODAMUS
    14) MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
    15) VERGHESE KURIEN
    16) MS SWAMINATHAN
    17) DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
    18) SANJAY R HEGDE
    19) MARK ZUCKERBERG
    20) JACK DORSEY
    21) THOMAS L FRIEDMAN
    22) ROMILA THAPAR
    23) IRFAN HABIB
    24) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
    25) SHELDON POLLOCK
    26) WENDY DONIGER
    27) BARKHA DUTT
    28) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
    29) SWARA BHASKAR
    30) KARAN THAPAR
    31) ADAM D ANGELO
    32) SAINT CRYIL ARCHBISHOP OF ALEXANDRIA
    33) N RAM
    34) GREAT THUNBERG
    35) MK GANDHI
    36) SONIA GANDHI












INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE BY THEODORE KACZYNSKI, A REVIEW- CRITIQUE BY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

$
0
0


THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM THE POST BELOW--

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by.html



THEODORE KACZYNSKI IS A JEW.. 


ONE OF MY POLISH SECOND ENGINEERs WITH SAME NAME TOLD ME THAT HE IS A JEW.. 


99% SERIAL KILLERS ARE WHITE JEWS






  1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED...

    CAPTAIN, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY ALL OUR ANCIENT WRITERS IN SANSKRIT , NEVER AFFIXED THEIR NAMES ON THE BOOKS / WORKS THEY AUTHORED.. SOME EXAMPLES OF DANAVAS KERALA NAMBOODIRIS---

    PANINI ( 5500 BC )
    BHARTRHARI ( 7000 BC )
    PATANJALI ( 5000 BC )
    MANU (8300 BC)
    YASKA ( 5800 BC )
    KANADA MUNI ( 6500 BC )
    VARAHAMIHIRA ( 2660 BC )
    VARARUCHI ( 2830 BC )

    WELL --

    IN ANCIENT TIMES ALMOST ALL GREAT WRITERS WERE JIVAN MUKTS.. THEY WOULD NOT BE RE-BORN ON PLANET EARTH AFTER THEY SHED THEIR MORTAL COIL..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-term-guru-mentioned-in-vedas-and.html

    AS YOUR KARMIC BAGGAGE REDUCES, YOUR SOUL FREQUENCY INCREASES AND YOUR EGO REDUCES..

    WHEN YOUR SOUL FREQUENCY IS RAISED TO THE LEVEL OF THE FIELD OF BRAHMAN ( ADVAITA GOD ), YOU HAVE MERGED WITH GOD WHILE ON PLANET EARTH.. SUCH A PERSON IS CALLED A JIVAN MUKT..

    WE DONT CREMATE JIVAN MUKTS AND SMALL CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 27 MONTHS-- AS THEY HAVE ZERO EGO.. THEIR SOULS ARE MERGED WITH BRAHMAN..

    TREAT SMALL CHILDREN WELL..NEVER BEAT THEM..

    A JIVAN MUKT CAN ACCESS THE AKASHIK RECORDS ( LIKE MODERN DAY CLOUD COMPUTING ) WHEN HE IS AWAKE..

    YOU AND ME CAN ACCESS IT ONLY DURING REM SLEEP..

    WHEN YOU ARE IN REM SLEEP, YOU WHOLE BODY IS PARALYZED EXCEPT YOUR PRICK / TWAT CLITORIS AND EYES WHICH MOVE RAPIDLY..

    BUT FITBIT AND MONITOR YOUR REM SLEEP..

    NOW NOW NOW-

    IT IS TIME FOR AN ALMIGHTY VADAKAYIL SWING ( THE FAMOUS VADAKAYIL BACKSWING IS AT THE LIMIT )..

    EVERY NOW AND THEN I TAUNT MODI ( TO MAKE HIM PERFORM )--

    HEY , MODI YOU ARE CHILDLESS AND I WILL WRITE YOUR LEGACY

    ########################

    TRUTH -- THERE IS NOTHING CALLED "LEGACY" FOR A HINDU, WHO GETS CREMATED..

    #######################

    WHEN YOU LOOK INTO THE MIRROR , WHAT YOU SEE IS NOT YOU..

    YOU ARE A SMALL BALL OF ENERGY WITHIN ( SOUL-- AT LOWER FREQUENCY THAN THE FIELD OF BRAHMAN)...

    WHEN YOU DIE , YOU ( SOUL ) WILL GO INTO THE WOMB OF ANOTHER WOMAN --UNLESS YOU ACHIEVED MOKSHA..

    KARMA DECIDES SOUL FREQUENCY-- THIS IS ADVANCED QUANTUM PHYSICS, WHICH THE PLANET WILL TAKE ANOTHER 500 YEARS TO COME IN TERMS WITH..

    SANATANA DHARMA STEEP IN SPIRITUALITY, IS ADVANCED QUANTUM PHYSICS--IT IS NOT A RELIGION ( SINGLE FAKE MESSIAH / SINGLE HOLY BOOK FULL OF FUCKIN' DOGMA ) AT ALL..

    IN BURIAL RELIGIONS, THE SOUL IS TRAPPED ON EARTH FOREVER , MISERABLE AND LONELY.. EXPLAINS THE DARGAH CONCEPT OF ISLAM.. YES--THESE UNFORTUNATE SOULS CAN HOLD THEIR "LEGACY" WHEREVER THEY WANT OR EVEN SHOVE IT.
    FOR HINDUS WHO GET CREMATED "LEGACY " DOES NOT EXIST..

    THIS EXPLAINS THE REASON WHY ANCIENT HINDUS NEVER AFFIXED THEIR NAMES ON THEIR GREAT WORKS.. THEY KNOW, AFTER DEATH THEY ( SOUL ) WILL BE BORN IN ANOTHER WOMB ..

    WHY IS TED KACZYNSKI ROTTING IN A "NON CORRECTIONAL" JAIL -- IN A CELL WITH NO WINDOW?

    HE WAS NOT INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO KNOW ABOUT HIMSELF ( SOUL)..

    HE WANTED TO PRESERVE HIS LEGACY WITH HIS "MIGHTY" THESIS / DISSERTATION.. BASICALLY RAMBLINGS HE PICKED UP IN BOOKS ELSEWHERE..

    THE WHOLE PLANET GOT BAFFLED NAY SPOOKED WITH HIS THESIS "INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE" -- AS HE WAS A GENIUS WITH IQ LEVEL OF 168..

    TED BABY TIED UP THE INTELLECTUALS OF THIS PLANET IN HAJAAAR KNOTS..



    HE CANNOT TIE UP VADAKAYIL IN KNOTS..
    IT TAKES AN INTELLECTUAL 24 HOURS TO READ HIS THESIS ..

    IT TOOK VADAKAYIL JUST ONE HOUR OF SPEED READING..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/02/speed-reading-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

    TED KACZYNSKIs LAWYER WANTED HIM TO PLEAD "NON GUILTY".. MEANING THAT HE WAS INSANE , AND HENCE MUST BE PUT IN A "CORRECTIVE " ASYLUM, WHERE HE COULD ENJOY FRESH AIR/ SUNSHINE AND ZE GOOD LIFE..

    BUT HEY--

    TED KACZYNSKIs EGO GOT THE BETTER OF HIM...

    CONTINUED TO 2--
    1. CONTINUED FROM 1--
      IF HE PLEADS "NOT GUILTY" , HIS PRECIOUS THESIS WOULD BE DUBBED BY POSTERITY, AS THE BULLSHIT WORK OF A MAD MAN..NOT WORTH READING..

      BUT IF HE PLEADS "GUILTY" HE SELF ATTESTS THAT HE IS A SANE MAN.. HIS THESIS WOULD BE READ FOR CENTURIES TO COME-- BECAUSE MEN OF 168 IQ DONT COME EASY ON THIS PLANET..

      FOR HIS "LEGACY" HE WAS WILLING TO SUFFER TILL HE KICKS THE BUCKET..INSIDE A ISOLATED JAIL..

      AND THAT IS WHAT HE IS DOING..TEE HEEEEE..

      ONLY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL CAN DECIDE WHAT HIS THESIS IS WORTH..ON THIS PLANET..

      AM I BOASTING-- SO BE IT..

      IF ANYBODY CAN WRITE A BETTER REVIEW- CRITIQUE--I WILL STOP BLOGGING AND EAT MY OWN HEAD..

      SOMEBODY HAS ASKED ME -- CAPTAIN, WHY DO YOU BOAST BEFORE THE EXAM/ TEST..

      THAT IS ME STYLE..

      OTHERS THROW THE DART AND THEN DRAW A CIRCLE AROUND IT..

      VADAKAYIL PUTS A DOT, BOASTS "I AM THE BEST "--WATCH THIS -- AND THEN THROWS THE DART ON THE POINT AND THEN TAKES A VICTORY LAP.

      I HAVE DONE IT AGAIN, AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AT SEA-- THE REASON I AM A LIVING LEGEND THERE..

      PSSST-- I DO IT TO MAKE MY DETRACTOR BOSSES SQUIRM.. WHEN I LEAVE A COMPANY , THEY ALL GET DRUNK AND CRY " SHALA GAYA WOH.. BACHCH GAYA SAALA "..

      I NEED ME KICKS , RIGHT ?

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/11/blue-ocean-leadership-capt-ajit.html

      WILL GENUS TED BABY OF IQ 168, EVEN UNDERSTAND 10% OF WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN-- MORE THAN 10,000 REVELATIONS..

      TED BABY WANTED TO PROVE THAT HE WAS A GENIUS , A CENTURY AHEAD OF HIS TIME..

      LET HIM IMAGINE HIS LEGACY IN JAIL..

      BOTTOM LINE: I HAVE A SOFT CORNER FOR TED KACZYNSKI .. HIS JEW PROFESSOR MURRAY AT HARVARD MESSED WITH HIS MIND ALLOWING FBI TO APPLY MK ULTRA BRAINWASH ON HIS SENSITIVE MIND..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..



  1. DONT GET INTIMIDATED BY HIS 168 IQ LEVEL..

    MERE INTELLECT CANNOT TAKE YOU FAR

    EXPERIENCE AND EXPOSURE MEANS EVERYTHING.. KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTION IS ROOTED IN EXPERIENCE..

    QUOTE: Thus pesticide or chemical use near a creek may contaminate the water supply hundreds of miles downstream, and the greenhouse effect affects the whole world. 119.UNQUOTE

    TED BABYs CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL REVOLVES AROUND A CREEK. THIS IS EARTH WORM TUNNEL VISION..

    WHERE DOES VADAKAYILs CONDOR VISON TAKE HIM?

    I TALK OF METHANE IN GULF STREAM AFFECTING THE GLOBAL OCEAN CURRENT CONVEYOR BELT AND AFFECTING INDIAs MONSOONS.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/record-heat-wave-europe-2019-root-cause.html

    CAN TED BABY EVER IMAGINE THIS ? THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A FROG IN A  WELL AND A CONDOR

    CAN TED BABY COVER THE VAST AMOUNT OF TOPICS I HAVE COVERED IN MY BLOGS? CAN HE MAKE MORE THAN 10,000 REVELATIONS?

    OH YEAH ?

    Capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

BELOW IS WHAT TED KACZYNSKI WROTE FROM HIS JAIL CELL



ANTI-TECH REVOLUTION:  WHY AND HOW- BY THEODORE KACZYNSKI

file:///C:/Users/win7/Downloads/Kaczynski%20Anti-Tech%20Revolution%20Why%20and%20How.pdf



BELOW: THE GLOBAL WARMING SCARE MOVEMENT IS A JEWISH DEEP STATE ( NEOCON ) MOVEMENT..  

TED BABY DOES NOT KNOW THIS..   TED HATES COMMIES..



http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/10/greta-thunberg-puppet-of-jewish-deep.html


BELOW:  MENTAL AND PHYSICAL MIDGET GRETA THUNBERG’S FREQUENT HANDLER IS LUISA-MARIE NEUBAUER, AN OPERATIVE FROM THE ONE MOVEMENT. NEUBAUER CAN BE SEEN BEHIND THUNBERG AT MANY OF HER PUBLIC EVENTS.




THE BILL GATES FOUNDATION ADMITS ON THEIR OFFICIAL WEBSITE THAT THE ONE MOVEMENT IS A COLLABORATION BETWEEN SOME OF THE WORLD’S RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL INTERESTS, INCLUDING INFAMOUS PROGRESSIVE FINANCIER GEORGE SOROS


TOGETHER WITH MELINDA GATES, BOBBY SHRIVER, GEORGE SOROS, ED SCOTT, BOB GELDOF, AND JAMIE DRUMMOND, THEY CREATED AN ANTI-POVERTY ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION CALLED DATA THAT FOCUSED ON DEPLOYING CELEBRITIES ( LIKE PRIYANKA CHOPRA PUSHING TO ADMIT ROHINGYAS INTO INDIA )AND OTHER INFLUENTIAL INDIVIDUALS TO URGE WORLD LEADERS TO TAKE ACTION ON SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES. 

WITHIN A FEW YEARS, DATA HAD JOINED WITH SEVERAL OTHER ORGANIZATIONS TO FORM ONE, WITH MAJOR BACKING FROM THE BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION.

BELOW: THIS DEH DROHI WOMAN IS THE MOST FAKE FEMALE ON THIS PLANET





BELOW: GRETA THUNBERG HAS BEEN WEARING ANTIFA T SHIRTS FOR A WHILE..



ANTIFA IS A VIOLENT COMMIE MOVEMENT ..



BELOW: PATHOLOGICAL LIAR GRETA THUNBERG AND HER EVIL PARENTS









BELOW:  ANTIFA WAS CREATED BY GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD 






DO YOU EXPECT SMALL GIRLS TO PROMOTE HOMOSEXUALITY?









































  1. RELAY MESSAGE--NOT MINE
    ######################

    #I_support_CAB

    Our Muslims Brothers & Sisters are not happy. I actually feel very sad for this as a human being.

    They’re not happy in Gaza
    They're not happy in Egypt
    They're not happy in Libya
    They're not happy in Morocco
    They're not happy in Iran
    They're not happy in Iraq
    They're not happy in Yemen
    They're not happy in Afghanistan
    They're not happy in Pakistan
    They're not happy in Syria
    They're not happy in Lebanon
    *************************************
    Lets Find The reason Why..
    So, where are they happy?
    They're happy in Australia
    They're happy in England
    They're happy in France
    They're happy in Italy
    They're happy in Germany
    They're happy in Sweden
    They're happy in the USA & Canada
    They're happy in INDIA

    They're happy in almost every country that is not
    Islamic! And who do they blame?
    Not Islam..
    Not their leadership..
    Not themselves..

    THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!!

    And they want to change the countries they're happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy.
    **********************************
    Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
    Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
    Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
    Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
    Confusians living with Bahai's = No Problem
    Bahai's living with Jews = No Problem
    Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
    Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
    Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
    Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
    Hindus living with Bahai's = No Problem
    Bahai's living with Christians = No Problem
    Christians living with Jews = No Problem
    Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
    Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
    Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
    Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
    Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem

    Now..

    Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
    Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
    Muslims living with Christians = Problem
    Muslims living with Jews = Problem
    Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
    Muslims living with Bahai's = Problem
    Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
    Muslims living with Atheists = Problem

    MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG
    PROBLEM !

    Mind You ! :

    Worth thinking upon...A very dear muslim friend of mine has sent me this!!!!!!!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
    Until today no one has told you the truth that ????

    There are 3 lakh mosques in India.

    No other country in the world has these many mosques.

    There are only 24 Churches in Washington.

    71 Churches in London.

    There are 68 Churches in the city of Milan in Italy.

    While in Delhi alone there are 271 churches.

    And you call a Hindu communal.

    Further I have not come across an Indian Muslim opposing ISIS.

    But we have millions of Hindus who are opposing views of RSS.

    I have not seen any Muslim holding party on Holi or Diwali festivals for Hindus, but have seen Hindus holding iftar for Muslims during Ramadan.

    I saw Indian flags being burnt in Kashmir by Indian Muslims.

    But never saw an Indian Muslim burning a Pakistan flag.

    I have seen Hindus wearing topis and visiting Mazars.

    But I have neither seen nor heard an Indian Muslim applying tilak on his forehead and visiting temples.

    This is called Hindu tolerance and respect for other religious community.

    It's my humble request to share this message with your friends & near and dear.

  1. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/18/politics/impeachment-watch-december-18/index.html

    THE ENTIRE US MEDIA AND WORLD MEDIA IS GLOATING OVER TRUMPs IMPEACHMENT PRELIMINARY AT THE US HOUSE OF REPS..

    THIS IMPEACHMENT WILL NEVER PASS THE SENATE TEST.. SO SAYS CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL..

    THE JEWISH DEEP SATE IS OFFERING BRIBES AND HAVE TAKEN OUT DIRT ( HONEY TRAP VIDEOS ) ON SENATE REPUBLICANS..

    BLACKMAIL BY HONEY TRAPS MUST BE A SUBJECT IN OUR ARMY AND POLICE ACADEMIES..

    JEWESS HELENA WHO CREATED THE DEEP STATE 17 CENTURIES AGO, USED THE HONEY TRAP METHOD, AS SHE HERSELF WAS ONE..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/istanbul-deep-seat-of-jewish-deep-state.html

    IN INDIA WE HAVE THE ITALIANS RULING--HOW?

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/01/of-honey-traps-and-pots-capt-ajit.html

    capt ajit vadakayil
    .













  • Dear Reader,
    Thanks for posting a comment on our article!.

    We appreciate your engagement on our website. But we are sorry, we cannot publish your comment as the content is not compliant with our editorial policies. While we do encourage you to participate in conversations on the website, we request you to refrain from posting any obscene, defamatory, or inflammatory comments. We also request you not to indulge in any personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community through your comments. Also, please do not copy message from the article itself.
    Comment Removed: You're right.
    Gandhi slept naked with under-aged girls, someone would tell why? Gandhi himself admits and we should call him father of nation, sic!
    Best wishes,
    Team TOI

  • GANDHI HIMSELF REVEALED HIS "EXPERIMENTS WITH TRUTH"..

    HE SAID IT WAS NOT ABOUT "ERECTION", IT WAS ABOUT "SEMEN EJACULATION"..

    GANDHI WOULD TRY NOT TO HAVE AN ORGASM -- TO PROVE HIS SELF CONTROL.. HE WOULD HAVE A ERECTION FOR HOURS..

    GANDHIs CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN HAVE ADMITTED THAT GANDHI SLEPT WITH NAKED UNDERAGED GIRLS --AFTER HE KICKED OUT KASTURBA ( WIFE ) FROM HIS BED ROOM.

    HIS SONS HAD REVOLTED .. SON DEVADAS WAS COUNTER CHARGED BY GANDHI ( FALSE ) OF BEING A PEDOPHILE HIMSELF, A WHOREMASTER AND A DRUNKARD.. WIFE KASTURBA REVOLTED..

    ONE OF GANDHIs GRANDCHILDREN CAME ON TV ( I SAW THIS) AND ADMITTED WITH A SAD FACE , THAT HIS GRANDFATHER HAD THE SAME HUMAN WEAKNESSES OF OTHERS..

    TODAY WE ARE BRANDED A PEDOPHILE FOR ONE "SINGLE WEAK MOMEMT".. OUR LIFE WILL BE OVER IF CAUGHT..

    THIS HAPPENS TO EVERYBODY.

    IF YOU TELL THE TRUTH, IT HAS HAPPENED TO YOU TOO.

    I NEVER LIKED TO VISIT MY SONS IN THEIR SCHOOLS, THE WAY SMALL SCHOOL GIRLS IN THE AGE OF 13 TO 15 THREW THEMSELVES AT ME..

    THIS IS A VERY VULNERABLE AGE..AND I WAS AN OLD MAN WITH SILVER HAIR.

    ONE PRETTY GIRL WITH BIG ASS AND TITS, EVEN CAME IN FRONT OF ME, WITH HER ASS TOUCHING MY CROTCH ,, DROPPED HER HANKY AND WAS GRINDING HER "BHOASADA" AGAINST ME. HER HANKY REMAINED EVER ELUSIVE TO HER GRASP..

    I MOVED AWAY FAST.. THIS COULD KICK ME INTO THE PEN TILL I DIE..

    GANDHI IS GUILTY OF NOT ONE MOMENT

    NOT ONE MINUTE

    NOT ONE HOUR

    NOT ONE DAY

    NOT A WEEK

    NOT A MONTH

    NOT A YEAR

    NOT A SINGLE DECADE

    HE DID "OPEN PEDOPHILIA" FOR SEVERAL DECADES..

    GANDHI WAS "BRAIN WASHED " VIA THE MOOLADHARA CHAKRA METHOD BY GERMAN JEW AND HUMPING GAY, A BODY BUILDER NAMED HERMANN KALLENBACH..

    HERMANN BABY HIMSELF ADMITTED THAT HE AND GANDHI SHARED THE SAME ROOM AND BED AFTER HE KICKED OUT KASTURBA IN THE NAME OF BRAHMACHARI..

    I GOT THIS DIRTY SECRET FROM A OLD INDIAN MAN IN CAPETOWN, WHO CLEANED GANDHIs BED ROOM ( AND HIS SHIT LADEN CHAMBER POT CONTAINING THE ENEMA EXPELLED WATERY SHIT OF GANDHI AND GANDHIs AND HIS TWO UNDERAGE GIRLS ) DAILY , TWICE A DAY..

    ONLY PEOPLE WITH CORRUPT SOULS ENGAGE IN PEDOPHILIA FOR SEVERAL DECADES..

    WE DARE MODI CONDUCT A NATIONWIDE REFERENDUM ###### WHOM DO YOU WANT AS FATHER OF OUR NATION, ROTHSCHILDs AGENT KATHIAWARI JEW GANDHI OR CHANAKYA OR ADI SHANKARACHARYA" #########

    IN THIS INTERNET AGE , PEOPLE KNOW.. DOODH KA DOODH, PAANI KA PAANI.

    NAKED GANDHI TOOK BATH WITH THESE NAKED GIRLS, WHO SOAPED HIS BODY..

    ONE MAGAZINE CONDUCTED THE INTERVIEW OF ONE OF THESE GIRLS, IN HER OLD AGE, STILL SCARRED BY EXTREME TRAUMA..

    QUESTION FROM WRITER --WERE YOU NAKED WHEN YOU AND GANDHI TOOK BATH TOGETHER ?

    ANSWER ---( AFTER A LONG PAUSE , HER FACE FLUSHED AND FOREHEAD /CHIN CREASED ) -- I DONT REMEMBER !

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-diabolical-brain-washing-process-of.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/01/mahatma-gandhi-and-his-endless.html


    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..




  • CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE BY THEODORE KACZYNSKI, A REVIEW- CRITIQUE BY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL, Part 3

    $
    0
    0

    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 2, BELOW--





    SOMEBODY CALLED UP UP AND CRIED

    CAPTAIN , WHAT IS THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TED KACZYNSKI AND VADAKAYIL?

    WELL, I WAS A LEADER OF MEN.. TED BABY DID NOT HAVE LEADERSHIP SPIRIT INHERENT.


    VADAKAYIL KEPT THINGS SIMPLE.. TO EXPLAIN CRUCIAL CONCEPTS TO SIMPLE SAILORS , I EQUATED IT WITH SEX..AND SAILORS IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTOOD.. THIS IS WHY NOBODY WANTED TO MISS A METTING CALLED BY VADAKAYIL..

    TED BABY IS A PATHETIC CHANGE MANAGER..


    VADAKAYIL WAS AN EXPERT IN CIRCUMVENTING THE PAIN OF CHANGE..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/12/change-management-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/04/domino-effect-in-change-management-capt.html


    THE MANIFESTO, ENTITLED INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE, WAS A 35,000 WORD POLEMIC DETAILING THE THREATS THAT INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY POSED TO FREEDOM AND WILD NATURE. AT THE CRUX OF THE DOCUMENT’S ANALYSIS WAS A CONCEPT CALLED ‘THE POWER PROCESS’, OR AN INNATE HUMAN NEED TO ENGAGE IN AUTONOMOUS GOAL SETTING AND ACHIEVEMENT

    ACCORDING TO KACZYNSKI THE HUMAN IN MODERN SOCIETY EXPERIENCES A LACK OF FULFILLMENT IN ITS LIFE DUE TO  THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY ON THE ABILITY TO FULFIL OF THE POWER PROCESS. HE STATES  THAT BY DESTROYING TECHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY AND ENABLING PEOPLE TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS, THEY WILL LIVE FULFILLED LIVES.

    KACZYNSKI STARTS BY STATING THAT INDIVIDUALS HAVE A NEED, PROBABLY BASED IN BIOLOGY, FOR  THE POWER PROCESS.   THIS POWER PROCESS HAS FOUR ELEMENTS. THESE BEING GOAL, EFFORT, ATTAINMENT OF  GOAL AND AUTONOMY. 

    HE EXPLAINS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GOALS BY USING THE EXAMPLE OF A LEISURED ARISTOCRAT. THIS ARISTOCRAT HAS AN ABUNDANCE OF POWER AT HIS DISPOSAL BUT NO WAY TO EXERCISE IT, THIS WILL LEAVE HIM  ACUTELY BORED OR DEPRESSED. 

    KACZYNSKI STATES THAT HAVING POWER IS NOT ENOUGH, ONE MUST HAVE GOALS TOWARDS WHICH ONE’S POWER CAN BE EXERCISED. KACZYNSKI STATES THAT EVERYONE HAS AT LEAST THE GOAL OF ACQUIRING PHYSICAL NECESSITIES SUCH AS FOOD, WATER AND SHELTER. WHEN WE LOOK AT THE LEISURED ARISTOCRAT

    WE SEE THAT THESE NECESSITIES WERE TAKEN CARE OF FOR HIM BEFORE HE WAS EVEN BORN. BECAUSE HE DOES NOT  HAVE TO EXERT ANY EFFORT IN THE PURSUIT OF THIS GOAL IT WILL NOT GIVE HIM ANY FULFILLMENT. 

    KACZYNSKI FURTHER  STATES THAT IF ONE IS NOT ABLE TO ATTAIN HIS GOAL OF ACQUIRING PHYSICAL NECESSITIES THIS WILL RESULT IN DEATH, BUT THE NON ATTAINMENT OF OTHER GOALS RESULTS IN FRUSTRATION, WHICH LEADS TO LOW SELF-ESTEEM. 

    FROM THIS HE  CONCLUDES THAT ALL PEOPLE NEED GOALS THAT REQUIRE SERIOUS EFFORT TO ATTAIN AND A REASONABLE RATE OF SUCCESS  IN ATTAINING THESE GOALS, IF ONE WERE TO AVOID SERIOUS PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. 

    KACZYNSKI GOES ON TO  STATE MOST PEOPLE, BUT NOT ALL, NEED SOME SENSE OF AUTONOMY IN THE POWER PROCESS. THIS DOES NOT MEAN  AN INDIVIDUAL HAS TO WORK ALONE, BUT THAT WHEN HE WORKS IN A SMALL GROUP AT LEAST HE HAS TO BE ABLE TO  ASSERT SOME CONTROL.

    KACZYNSKI STATES THAT THE PRIMITIVE INDIVIDUAL SUFFERED FROM LESS STRESS AND FRUSTRATION BECAUSE ITS NEED FOR THE POWER PROCESS WAS INTACT, DESPITE FACING MORE ACUTE DANGERS, RESULTING IN A LOWER LIFE  EXPECTANCY.  

    AN EXAMPLE HE GIVES IS ABOUT SECURITY. PRIMITIVE MAN WAS AT A HIGHER RISK OF DISEASE AND  ATTACKS BY WILD ANIMALS, BUT ACCORDING TO KACZYNSKI THEY COULD IN SOME WAYS ACCEPT THIS AS THE NATURE  OF THINGS. WHEREAS FOR THE MODERN INDIVIDUAL THE DANGERS HE FACES ARE MAN-MADE AND IMPOSED, FOR  EXAMPLE ECONOMIC PROBLEMS OR ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION. 

    THE MODERN INDIVIDUAL FEELS FRUSTRATED BECAUSE   THESE THINGS ARE OUTSIDE OF ITS CONTROL, BUT “THE DIFFERENCES, WE ARGUE, IS THAT MODERN MAN HAS THE SENSE (LARGELY JUSTIFIED) THAT CHANGE IS IMPOSED ON HIM.”

    KACZYNSKI STATES THAT BECAUSE PHYSICAL NECESSITIES ARE THERE IN ABUNDANCE, PEOPLE INVEST THEIR TIMES IN SURROGATE ACTIVITIES PURSUING ARTIFICIAL GOALS TO SATISFY THEIR NEED OF THE POWER PROCESS.

    KACZYNSKI DESCRIBES SOME CONSEQUENCES: “WHEN ONE DOES NOT HAVE ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY TO GO THROUGHTHE POWER PROCESS THE CONSEQUENCES ARE …BOREDOM, DEMORALIZATION, LOW SELF-ESTEEM, INFERIORITY FEELINGS, DEFEATISM, DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, GUILT, FRUSTRATION, HOSTILITY, SPOUSE OR CHILD ABUSE, INSATIABLE HEDONISM, ABNORMAL SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR, SLEEP DISORDERS, EATING DISORDERS, ETC.”.  

    HE IS SURELY DESCRIBING HOS OWN CONDITION WHILE LIVING LIKE A PIG ALONE IN A CABIN FOR 25 YEARS.

    KACZYNSKI IS NOT SO MUCH AGAINST TECHNOLOGY AS SUCH, BUT AGAINST TECHNOLOGY THAT HINDERS THE POWER PROCESS. HE DOES NOT NECESSARILY WANT TO RETURN TO A PRIMITIVE SOCIETY BY DESTROYING ALL TECHNOLOGY, AS HE SEES THE MANY HARDSHIPS THAT COME ALONG WITH SUCH A WAY OF LIVING. 

    HE IS RATHER AGAINST MODERN TECHNOLOGY THAT CREATES MONOTONOUS AND PURPOSELESS LIVES BY DISTURBING THE NEED FOR THE POWER PROCESS. 

    JAI JAI POWER PROCESS.  TED BABY KAA POWER PROCESS !

    TED BABY ARGUES THAT SCIENTISTS (AND PRESUMABLY OTHER TECHNICAL PROFESSIONALS) PURSUE THEIR CAREERS AS SURROGATE ACTIVITIES, MAINLY TO FULFILL THE POWER PROCESS

    TED BABY SAYS-- ONE'S PURPOSE IN LIFE SHOULD BE CLEAR, WHATEVER IT IS, WHOMEVER YOU ARE. AND IT'S HELPFUL TO ASK IF WHAT YOU'RE WORKING ON ADVANCES YOUR PURPOSE (POWER PROCESS) OR IS SIMPLY A SURROGATE ACTIVITY.

    HIS CONCEPTS OF FREEDOM AND THE 'POWER PROCESS' ARE THE FOUNDATION OF HIS BULLSHIT MANIFESTO.

    HIS POWER PROCESS IS INTERESTING, BUT FAILS TO CONSIDER OTHER PROCESS' THAT PEOPLE FIND BENEFICIAL. IT IS MERELY ONE ASPECT OF THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE, NOT ALL ENCOMPASSING.

    TED BABY CONSTRUCTS HIS POWER PROCESS, “IN ORDER TO AVOID SERIOUS PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS, A HUMAN BEING NEEDS GOALS WHOSE ATTAINMENT REQUIRES EFFORT, AND HE MUST HAVE A REASONABLE RATE OF SUCCESS IN ATTAINING HIS GOALS”

    THE NEED FOR POWER IS A WELL-ESTABLISHED IDEA THAT GOES BACK TO FREUD AND NIETZSCHE, BUT IN KACZYNSKI’S EYES IT IS AN INCOMPLETE PICTURE. IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO HAVE POWER (WHATEVER THAT MEANS), BUT RATHER ONE MUST SATISFY THE POWER PROCESS IN ITS ENTIRETY IN ORDER TO LIVE A FULFILLING LIFE. 

    IT IS COMPRISED OF THE GOAL, EFFORT, ATTAINMENT OF THE GOAL, AND AUTONOMY. THE POWER PROCESS CANNOT BE FULFILLED WITHOUT ALL FOUR OF THESE ELEMENTS BEING PRESENT.

    IN OTHER WORDS, ATTAINMENT OF THE GOAL WITHOUT EFFORT IS MEANINGLESS, EFFORT WITHOUT AUTONOMY IS SLAVERY, A GOAL WITHOUT ATTAINMENT LEADS TO POWERLESSNESS AND DEPRESSION, AND AUTONOMY WITHOUT GOAL CREATES BOREDOM AND THE DANGERS THAT COME WITH IT.

    HE REACHES THE CONCLUSION THAT "SCIENCE MARCHES ON BLINDLY, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE REAL WELFARE OF THE HUMAN RACE" .    THIS SURROGATE ACTIVITY -- THAT EVERY ENGINEER PARTAKES IN -- IS THUS AT BEST ORTHOGONAL TO KACZYNSKI'S IMPLICIT GUIDING ETHICAL PRINCIPLE: MINIMIZING TOTAL HUMAN SUFFERING.

    AS WE SAW IN HIS DISCUSSION OF THE DISRUPTED POWER PROCESS, KACZYNSKI THINKS THAT THE ADVANCEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY CAN IN FACT WORK AGAINST HUMAN WELFARE.

     EVEN IF HUMANS REMAIN IN CONTROL, KACZYNSKI CLAIMS THAT ADVANCES IN THE FIELD OF GENETIC ENGINEERING WILL "CONTINUE UNTIL MAN AND OTHER ORGANISMS HAVE BEEN UTTERLY TRANSFORMED" BECAUSE "ONCE YOU START MODIFYING ORGANISMS THROUGH GENETIC ENGINEERING THERE IS NO REASON TO STOP AT ANY PARTICULAR POINT" . 

    KACZYNSKI THINKS THAT THE INEVITABLE REGULATION OF GENETIC ENGINEERING  WOULD LEAD TO A CURTAILMENT OF THE AUTONOMY THAT HE BELIEVES ENHANCES THE POWER PROCESS , CONCLUDING THAT "THE ONLY CODE OF ETHICS THAT WOULD TRULY PROTECT FREEDOM WOULD BE ONE THAT PROHIBITED ANY GENETIC ENGINEERING OF HUMAN BEINGS" . 

    THE POPULARITY OF THE FILM GATTACA, A DEPICTION OF A GENETICALLY ENGINEERED SOCIETY, RELEASED SHORTLY AFTER THE UNABOMBER'S ARREST, SUGGESTS WIDESPREAD SYMPATHY FOR THIS VIEW.

    THE POWER PROCESS PLAYS A LARGE ROLE IN HIS ESSAY. THE POWER PROCESS CONSISTS OF 4 STAGES DISTINCT STAGES. GOAL, EFFORT, ATTAINMENT OF GOAL, AND AUTONOMY. HUMAN’S HAVE A BIOLOGICAL NEED FOR THE POWER PROCESS. 

    KACYZINSKI ARGUES THAT HUMAN LIFE HAS BECOME TOO EASY AND THAT OBTAINING THE BARE PHYSICAL NECESSITIES OF LIFE HAS BECOME TOO EASY, AND NO LONGER LEADS TO A SENSE OF SATISFACTION, RESULTING IN THE WIDESPREAD UNHAPPINESS THAT PLAGUES THE LAND HE ARGUES THAT AS HUMAN LIFE CONTINUES TO BECOME INUNDATED WITH TECHNOLOGY, OUR LEVEL OF FREEDOM, AND HAPPINESS CAN ONLY DECREASE. 

    HE CONTINUES TO ARGUE THAT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH LARGE SCALE TECHNOLOGY (TECHNOLOGY THAT CANNOT BE CREATED OR CARED FOR ON A GRASSROOTS LEVEL) MUST BE COMPLETELY SEVERED.

    THE "POWER PROCESS" IS TED'S GOLDEN HAMMER. EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING PEOPLE DO IS TO ACHIEVE A GOAL WHICH SATISFIES THEM. THIS IS AN ALRIGHT STARTING POINT, HOWEVER IT BECOMES UTTERLY DEMEANING WHEN USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH TED'S OTHER CENTRAL CONCEPT:

    --THE SODDING "SURROGATE ACTIVITY" .

    BOMBERBOY DISMISSES CURIOSITY, THE DESIRE FOR THE BETTERMENT OF HUMANITY ETC. AS ANYTHING OTHER THAN MEN OF CARDBOARD SET UP BY HUMANS SO THEY COULD BE DEFEATED AND MAKE HUMANS FEEL ACCOMPLISHED. THIS IS INSULTING. 

    HIS SECTION ABOUT SCIENCE , IN PARTICULAR, DISMISSES THAT ANYONE CAN BE CURIOUS ABOUT ANYTHING. IT IS ONE OF THE WORST, MOST CYNICAL THINGS I HAVE EVER READ IN MY LIFE, AND I WON'T GO INTO DETAIL ABOUT WHY IT IS COMPLETELY WRONG.

    A FIFTH OF THIS MANIFESTO IS AN ATTACK TOWARDS LEFTISM. WHILE SOME POINTS ARE VALID AS A WHOLE, HIS CENTRAL CONCEIT IS WHAT BUGS ME ENDLESSLY: LEFTISTS ARE ALL JUST A BUNCH OF SELF-LOATHING, DEFEATIST BUMS WHO ARE ONLY LEFTIST TO SATISFY THEIR "POWER PROCESS" , AND THAT THEY DON'T ACTUALLY DESIRE TO HELP MINORITIES ETC.

    WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE THAT TED BABY WAS INCREDIBLY WELL-READ IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES. 

    MY LEFT BALL!.. 

    HE JUST STOLE GOLDEN NUGGETS FROM THE WORKS OF VARIOUS AUTHORS.. HE VISITED THE LOCAL LIBRARY WHEN IS WAS STAYING IN THE WOODEN CABIN FOR 25 LONG YEARS.

    ONE MARK OF A REAL INTELLECTUAL IS THAT, WHILE HE LEARNS FROM BOOKS AND FROM ESTABLISHED WRITERS, HE ALSO MAKES HIS OWN OBSERVATIONS, AND TRUSTS HIS OWN JUDGMENTS.

    HIS MANIFESTO IS CLEARLY INFLUENCED BY VIKTOR FRANKL (THE POWER PRINCIPLE/WILL TO MEANING), KARL POLANYI (THE DAMAGE DONE BY INDUSTRIALIZATION), ERIC HOFFER(REVOLUTION’S DEPENDENCE ON MASS MOVEMENTS), AND MARSHALL MCLUHAN (HOW MEDIA INSTILLS VALUES IN CITIZENS), AND MOST OF HIS IDEAS ARE BORNE OF FAIRLY SENSIBLE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE WORKS OF THESE THINKERS.

    TED KACZYNSKI'S POWER PROCESS RESEMBLES ERIC HOFFER'S THEORY OF SUBSTITUTES. IN "THE ORDEAL OF CHANGE" AND "THE TRUE BELIEVER,"    

    ERIC HOFFER ADVANCES HIS THEORY THAT PEOPLE SEEK SUBSTITUTES FOR THINGS THEY CANNOT HAVE. THAT IS, PEOPLE HAVE DEEP NEEDS FOR SUCH THINGS AS SELF-CONFIDENCE, SELF-FULFILLMENT, A SENSE OF PURPOSE AND PRIDE IN THEIR WORK. 

    WHEN PEOPLE CANNOT GET SUCH THINGS THEY SEEK SUBSTITUTES, AND "IN THE CHEMISTRY OF THE SOUL, A SUBSTITUTE IS ALMOST ALWAYS EXPLOSIVE..."

    THE NOVELS OF FELLOW POLISH JEW JOSEPH CONRAD,  PROVIDED THE UNABOMBER WITH THE IMAGE OF AN INTELLECTUAL WHO WAS AN ANARCHIST/REVOLUTIONARY/BOMBER.

    FOR INSTANCE, IT WOULD BE TOTALLY REASONABLE TO THINK THAT A BIG SOURCE OF SOCIETY’S PROBLEMS IS HOW INDUSTRIALIZATION HAS LED TO LIVING CONDITIONS THAT FRUSTRATE PEOPLE’S NEED TO WORK TOWARDS SOMETHING MEANINGFUL. 

    HOWEVER, KACZYNSKI’S PHILOSOPHY BREAKS DOWN BECAUSE HE TAKES HIS CONCLUSIONS TOO FAR. HE THINKS THAT THE ONLY TYPE OF WORK THAT GIVES SOMEONE’S LIFE REAL MEANING IS THE STRUGGLE FOR SURVIVAL - EVERYTHING ELSE, FROM SCIENTIFIC PURSUITS TO SOCIAL COHESION, IS IN HIS MIND A FALSE GOAL. 

    HE’S ALSO AGAINST ANY FORM OF “SOCIALIZATION”, OR WAYS IN WHICH THE SYSTEM IMPOSES VALUES ON PEOPLE WHICH MAKE SOCIETY RUN MORE SMOOTHLY. MAN IS A SOCIAL ANIMAL, AND IS AT HIS BEST WHEN HE’S PART OF A COMMUNITY, BUT INDIVIDUALS MAY HAVE TENDENCIES THAT ACT AS BARRIERS TO INTEGRATION. TO BE COMPLETELY AGAINST SOCIALIZATION, AS KACZYNSKI IS, IS TO BE COMPLETELY AGAINST SOCIETY. ULTIMATELY, THAT’S WHAT THE UNABOMBER IS. 

    HIS DESCRIPTION OF THE POWER PROCESS THAT WHAT IS SATISFYING IS ACCOMPLISHING SOMETHING WITH MEANINGFUL EFFORT (WHICH HAS ELSEWHERE BEEN CALLED "PROGRESS AGAINST PERCEIVED CHALLENGE) AND I THINK WE ARE SEEING NOW WHERE PEOPLE ARE GETTING SOME SATISFACTION FROM GAMES WHERE VARIOUS FORMS OF LEVELING ARE BASICALLY DESIGNED TO MAXIMIZE THAT SENSATION), AND HOW THE STRUCTURE HAVE LIFE AND SOCIETY HAVE EVOLVED IN A WAY SUCH THAT WE ARE ENGAGED IN THAT PROCESS FAR LESS THAN IN THE PAST

    TED BABY FEELS THAT THE POWER PROCESS IS EASILY SATISFIED BY SIMPLY LIVING IN THE ENVIRONMENT FOR WHICH HUMAN BEINGS HAVE EVOLVED. THIS MAKES SENSE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF EVOLUTIONARY-PSYCHOLOGY, IGNORING FOR A MOMENT THE PROBLEMS THAT COME WITH THAT FIELD OF ‘SCIENCE’.

    A YOUNG MAN GOES THROUGH THE POWER PROCESS BY BECOMING A HUNTER, HUNTING NOT FOR SPORT OR FOR FULFILLMENT BUT TO GET MEAT THAT IS NECESSARY FOR FOOD.

     CHOO CHWEEET APPAAAH !

    TED BABY EXPLAINS --AUTONOMY, WHICH IS A CENTRAL COMPONENT OF THE POWER PROCESS IS MINIMIZED BY OUR RELIANCE ON TECHNOLOGY. EVEN THOUGH TECHNOLOGY TYPICALLY IS SEEN TO GIVE US MORE FREEDOM, IN REALITY IT ENSLAVES US AND FORCES US TO OPERATE ONLY WITHIN THE NARROWING CONFINES OF THE SYSTEM THAT RESULTS. 

    FOR MOST PEOPLE, SURROGATE ACTIVITIES ARE LESS SATISFYING THAN THE PURSUIT OF REAL GOALS -THAT IS, GOALS THAT PEOPLE WOULD WANT TO ATTAIN EVEN IF THEIR NEED FOR THE POWER PROCESS WERE ALREADY FULFILLED.


    TED BABY’S  MANIFESTO IS BEING BUILT UPON VERY SHAKY FOUNDATIONS.


    “WE CONTEND THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT CAUSE OF SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN MODERN SOCIETY IS THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE INSUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY TO GO THROUGH THE POWER PROCESS IN A NORMAL WAY. WE DON’T MEAN TO SAY THAT MODERN SOCIETY IS THE ONLY ONE IN WHICH THE POWER PROCESS HAS BEEN DISRUPTED. 

    PROBABLY MOST IF NOT ALL CIVILIZED SOCIETIES HAVE INTERFERED WITH THE POWER PROCESS TO A GREATER OR LESSER EXTENT. BUT IN MODERN INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY THE PROBLEM HAS BECOME PARTICULARLY ACUTE. LEFTISM, AT LEAST IN ITS RECENT (MID- TO LATE-20TH CENTURY) FORM, IS IN PART A SYMPTOM OF DEPRIVATION WITH RESPECT TO THE POWER PROCESS.”

    WE ( FC / CHOOT TED ) SUGGEST THAT MODERN MAN’S OBSESSION WITH LONGEVITY, AND WITH MAINTAINING PHYSICAL VIGOR AND SEXUAL ATTRACTIVENESS TO AN ADVANCED AGE, IS A SYMPTOM OF UNFULFILLMENT RESULTING FROM DEPRIVATION WITH RESPECT TO THE POWER PROCESS. THE “MID-LIFE CRISIS” ALSO IS SUCH A SYMPTOM.

    “AGAIN, HAVING SUCCESSFULLY RAISED HIS CHILDREN, GOING THROUGH THE POWER PROCESS BY PROVIDING THEM WITH THE PHYSICAL NECESSITIES, THE PRIMITIVE MAN FEELS THAT HIS WORK IS DONE AND HE IS PREPARED TO ACCEPT OLD AGE (IF HE SURVIVES THAT LONG) AND DEATH.”.. AS A FROG IN A WELL TED WENT BACK TO STONE AGE BY TIME TRAVEL?

    “SOCIETY MUST FIND A WAY TO GIVE PEOPLE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO THROUGH THE POWER PROCESS.” THIS WON’T WORK FOR THOSE WHO NEED AUTONOMY IN THE POWER PROCESS. 

    FOR SUCH PEOPLE THE VALUE OF THE OPPORTUNITY IS DESTROYED BY THE VERY FACT THAT SOCIETY GIVES IT TO THEM. WHAT THEY NEED IS TO FIND OR MAKE THEIR OWN OPPORTUNITIES. 

    AS LONG AS THE SYSTEM GIVES THEM THEIR OPPORTUNITIES IT STILL HAS THEM ON A LEASH. TO ATTAIN AUTONOMY THEY MUST GET OFF THAT LEASH.”

    WHILST KACZYNSKI ACCURATELY DESCRIBES A RANGE OF COMMON HUMAN BEHAVIOUR SEEN IN VARIOUS STRATA OF SOCIETY, HIS ASSERTION THAT THIS COMES SOLELY FROM THE POWER PROCESS IS MYOPIC AND MINDLESS.

    “OUR SOCIETY USES IT TOO, THOUGH LESS CRUDELY. EXAMPLE: MANUEL NORIEGA WAS AN IRRITANT TO THE U.S. (GOAL: PUNISH NORIEGA). THE U.S. INVADED PANAMA (EFFORT) AND PUNISHED NORIEGA (ATTAINMENT OF GOAL).   

    THUS THE U.S. WENT THROUGH THE POWER PROCESS AND MANY AMERICANS, BECAUSE OF THEIR IDENTIFICATION WITH THE U.S., EXPERIENCED THE POWER PROCESS VICARIOUSLY.”

    TED KACZYNSKI UNDERMINES HIS OWN ARGUMENT HERE. BY ATTEMPTING TO SHOW THAT AN ENTIRE SOCIETY ITSELF GOES THROUGH THE POWER PROCESS HE SHOWS HOW EVEN EXTRA-HUMAN EVENTS CAN FIT IT'S MODEL.

    USING THE POWER PROCESS TO ANALYSE THE BEHAVIOUR OF NATION STATE ON NATION STATE FALLS WOEFULLY SHORT OF A RIGOROUS EXPLORATION OF ALL THE NUANCES OF WHY SUCH EVENTS OCCURRED.

    PURE CURIOSITY, THE DESIRE TO KNOW SOMETHING, TO UNDERSTAND IT, IS A FUNDAMENTAL PART OF BEING HUMAN AND CAN EXIST INDEPENDENTLY OF ANY 'POWER PROCESS' OR BASIC NEED.

    DOES A BABY EXPLORE THE WORLD AROUND SO AS TO SATISFY THE POWER PROCESS? OR PERHAPS IT'S AN INNATE CURIOSITY 'PROGRAMMED' GENETICALLY?

     “MODERN MAN IS STRAPPED DOWN BY A NETWORK OF RULES AND REGULATIONS… MOST OF THESE REGULATIONS CANNOT BE DISPOSED WITH, BECAUSE THEY ARE NECESSARY FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY. 

    WHEN ONE DOES NOT HAVE ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY TO GO THROUGHOUT THE POWER PROCESS THE CONSEQUENCES ARE …BOREDOM, DEMORALIZATION, LOW SELF-ESTEEM, INFERIORITY FEELINGS, DEFEATISM, DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, GUILT, FRUSTRATION, HOSTILITY, SPOUSE OR CHILD ABUSE, INSATIABLE HEDONISM, ABNORMAL SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, SLEEP DISORDERS, EATING DISORDERS, ETC”

    LESS CONVINCING ARE THE UNABOMBER'S ATTEMPTS TO CONNECT HIS CRITICISM OF LEFTISM TO HIS CRITICISM OF TECHNOLOGY, FOR INSTANCE BY CLAIMING PEOPLE BECOME LEFTISTS BECAUSE THEIR POWER PROCESS IS DISRUPTED BY TECHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 

    THERE, HE IS TRYING TO ARTIFICIALLY CONNECT TWO TYPES OF CRITICISM THAT ARE REALLY INDEPENDENT; HIS TRYING TO ARTIFICIALLY CONNECT A SOUND CRITICISM (LEFTISM) TO A LARGELY UNSOUND ONE (TECHNOLOGY).

    THE "POWER PROCESS" IS ABOUT SATISFYING OUR HUMAN DIGNITY: "...POWER IS NOT ENOUGH. ONE MUST HAVE GOALS TOWARD WHICH TO EXERCISE ONE'S POWER." WE ALL NEED TO FEEL THAT THAT WE ARE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING OURSELVES, THAT WE HAVE SOME PURPOSE TO WORK TOWARD, THAT OUR EXISTENCE IS JUSTIFIED. 

    AIYYYOOOOOO

    THESE GOALS MUST NOT BE EMPTY ACTIVITIES. WE WOULD NOT BE SATISFIED WITH A LIFE OF DIGGING UP HOLES AND FILLING THEM BACK IN. TO KACZYNSKI, THE POWER PROCESS HAS AT LEAST THREE REQUIREMENTS. TO BE SATISFIED WITH LIFE, WE MUST HAVE 

    GOALS, WHICH  REQUIRE OUR EFFORTS, WITH A REASONABLE CHANCE OF OUR PERSONAL SUCCESS. THAT IS, MAYBE IT IS SATISFYING FOR SOME PEOPLE TO FISH, BUT A POOR FISHERMAN WILL NOT SATISFY HIS INNERMOST NEEDS BY FAILING OVER AND OVER. 

    HE MUST FIND SOME OTHER ACTIVITY. THIS LEADS TO THE OPTIONAL FOURTH REQUIREMENT OF THE POWER PROCESS: 

    WE MUST AUTONOMY IN SELECTING OUR GOALS. WHEN WE HAVE ROOM TO STRUGGLE AND SUCCEED FOR OUR EXISTENCE ON OUR OWN TERMS, THIS IS FREEDOM, THIS IS HAPPINESS. 

    BAAAAP REH !

    THE CONCEPT OF "THE POWER PROCESS" IS REMINISCENT OF MASLOW'S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS. REMARKABLE IS THAT THE UNABOMBER ONLY QUALIFIES A VERY LIMITED SET OF GOALS TO TRULY SERVE THE POWER PROCESS.

    IT IS EVIDENT FROM THIS THAT EVEN WHEN KACZYNSKI WAS LIVING ( LIKE A LIG )  A FULFILLING LIFE ( SIC_ AND WAS ABLE TO UTILIZE THE POWER PROCESS TO ITS FULLEST EXTENT, NEW DOUBTS AND DESIRES TINKLED DOWN FROM THE SUSPENDED HEIGHTS OF HIS ECCENTRICITY.

    IT BECOMES CLEAR FROM KACZYNSKI’S OWN LIFE IN THE WILDERNESS AND HIS APPARENT  UNFULFILLMENT EXPERIENCED THERE, THAT THE DESTRUCTION OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY WILL NOT BRING A SENSE OF EASE TO HIS LIFE. 

    THIS IS BECAUSE THE DISTRESS THAT HE ATTRIBUTES TO THE DISRUPTION OF THE POWER PROCESS BY MODERN TECHNOLOGY IS CAUSED BY THE FUNDAMENTAL HOMELESSNESS OF HUMAN EXISTENCE.


    TED BABY’S POWER PROCESS SEEMS LIKE A SPECIFIC SUBSET OF MASLOW'S NEEDS, THE SURROGATE ACTIVITIES SECTION IS SO PREVALENT COROLLARIES MIGHT BE FOUND IN ALMOST ANY SELF-HELP BOOK.

    I WONDER IF THE CONSTRUCT OF THE POWER PROCESS IS THE ONLY WAY OF ACHIEVING MEANINGFUL PSYCHOLOGICAL HAPPINESS AND SUSTAINABILITY?
    ANY MAN WITH WEE BIT OF COMMONSENSE WILL REJECT THE CERTAINTY OF HIS ASSERTION THAT THE POWER PROCESS IS THE PRIMARY MOTIVATING FACTOR IN HUMAN BEHAVIOUR.

    BERTRAND RUSSEL WAS THE FIRST MAN I DUMPED INTO THE VADAKAYIL GARBAGE BUCKET..    

    WHILE ON OUR TRAINING SHIP IN 1973, WE 250 CADETS HAD AN ENGLISH LITERATURE TEXT BOOK NAMED “ FORMS OF POWER”.. .

     IT WAS THE MOST BULLSHIT BOOK I HAD EVER READ TILL THEN. 

    OUR LECTURER’S NAME WAS SUBRAMANIAN—AND HE PRONOUNCED THE TITLE OF THE BOOK AS “ FAARRAMMS OF PAWARR

    TED BABY CONTENDS THAT THE CONSTRUCT OF THE POWER PROCESS IS THE ONLY WAY OF ACHIEVING MEANINGFUL PSYCHOLOGICAL HAPPINESS AND SUSTAINABILITY.. 

    BRAAAAYYYYYYYYY

    I REJECT THE CERTAINTY OF HIS ASSERTION THAT THE POWER PROCESS IS THE PRIMARY MOTIVATING FACTOR IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR.. SUCH LIMITED TOOLS ARE OFTEN USED BY THOSE WHO SEEK TO INFLUENCE AS THEY LET ONE MAKE GRAND SWEEPING STATEMENTS AND CREATE VILLAINS TO RALLY AGAINST.

    WHEN TED BABY SAYS, “LEFTISTS TEND TO HATE ANYTHING THAT HAS AN IMAGE OF BEING STRONG, GOOD AND SUCCESSFUL,” ONE THINKS OF NIETZSCHE, WHO OFTEN CASTIGATED THOSE WHO WERE RESENTFUL OF THE STRONG AND SUCCESSFUL.

    IF YOU HAVE READ NIETZCHE'S BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL, YOU WILL NOT FAIL TO NOTE HOW OVERLAPPING THE CONTENT WAS. THE WILL TO POWER IS THEODORE'S VERSION OF FREEDOM. I AM SURE HE WAS INSPIRED BY NIETZCHE AS WELL.. 

    THE LEGACY OF ROTHSCHILD’S AGENT  GERMAN JEW FRIEDRICH  NIETZCHE LIES IN THE VADAKAYIL GARBAGE BUCKET.. ROTHSCHILD USED THE RHETORIC OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE TO CREATE FAKE MESSIAHS TO BLEED BHARATMATA.

    THERE'S A NIETZSCHEAN RING TO MANY OF THE EVIL UNABOMBER'S ARGUMENTS
    WHEN THE UNABOMBER SAYS THAT THE LEFT OPPOSES RANKINGS/HIERARCHIES, ONE THINKS OF NIETZSCHE’S FONDNESS FOR RANKINGS/HIERARCHIES.


    LIKE MANY OF THE UNABOMBER’S IDEAS, THE IDEA OF “OVER-SOCIALIZATION” REMINDS ONE OF NIETZSCHE. NIETZSCHE NEVER TIRED OF LAMBASTING THE “HERD ANIMAL” AND PRAISING THE SOLITARY “BEAST OF PREY.”

    IT ISN’T TECHNOLOGY THAT ALIENATES US, BUT CORPORATE CONTROL OF TECHNOLOGY – FOR EXAMPLE APPLE, WHEN IT MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR US TO REPROGRAM OUR IPHONES. OR BOEING WHEN THEY CAUSES TWO AIRPLANES TO CRASH DEPRIVING A HUMAN PILOT OF THE POWER TO VETO


    TED KACZYNSKI DOES NOT HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO DO ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS..



    TED KACZYNSKI CAN NEVER BE PART OF A TEAM.. LEAVE ALONE LEAD IT.  CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL LEAD UNITED NATIONS TEAMS FOR 30 YEARS AS SHIP CAPTAIN..



    THE UNABOMBER WAS WELL AWARE THAT HIS WORK WOULD BE READ BECAUSE OF THE CRIMES HE COMMITTED. 

    HE REFERS TO HIS OWN GROUP AS FC (FREEDOM CLUB). IN REALITY, HE HIMSELF WAS THE ONLY MEMBER OF THIS “GROUP.” AS FOR THE NAME FC, IT WAS DERIVED FROM FP (FUTURE OF THE PROLETARIAT), THE NAME OF AN ANARCHIST GROUP IN JEW JOSEPG CONRAD’S NOVEL, THE SECRET AGENT. THE STORY IS SET IN LONDON IN 1886 AND DEALS WITH MR ADOLF VERLOC AND HIS WORK AS A SPY FOR RUSSIA. 

    THE NOVEL DEALS BROADLY WITH ANARCHISM, ESPIONAGE AND TERRORISM. TERRORISM AND ANARCHISM ARE INTRINSIC ASPECTS OF THE NOVEL, AND ARE CENTRAL TO THE PLOT.   BECAUSE OF ITS TERRORISM THEME, IT WAS ONE OF THE THREE WORKS OF LITERATURE MOST CITED IN THE AMERICAN MEDIA TWO WEEKS AFTER THE SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS..

    FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IS OF VERY LITTLE USE TO THE AVERAGE CITIZEN AS AN INDIVIDUAL. THE MASS MEDIA ARE MOSTLY UNDER THE CONTROL OF ROTHSCHILD CONTROLLED LARGE JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE SYSTEM. WE ALL KNOW HOW THE MEDIA HAS BEEN ATTACKING TRUMP EVER SINCE HE BECAME PRESIDENT..

    ANYONE WHO HAS A LITTLE MONEY CAN HAVE SOMETHING PRINTED. TO MAKE AN IMPRESSION ON SOCIETY WITH WORDS IS THEREFORE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE FOR MOST INDIVIDUALS - UNLESS HE A VADAKAYIL WHO IS LEADING A SILENT REVOLUTION.. 

    PRAY WHO WIPED OF THE PORTRAITS OF MARX/ LENIN FROM THE INDIAN COMMIE CAMPAIGNS AND SUBSTITUTED CHE GUEVARA INSTEAD?  WHO BROUGHT DOWN THE MIGHTY COMMNIST PARTY OF INDIA—IN AS MUCH TODAY IT IS THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF ALAPUZHA ?

    TED BABY WROTE QUOTE TAKE US (FC) FOR EXAMPLE. IF WE HAD NEVER DONE ANYTHING VIOLENT AND HAD SUBMITTED THE PRESENT WRITINGS TO A PUBLISHER, THEY PROBABLY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED. 

    IF THEY HAD BEEN ACCEPTED AND PUBLISHED, THEY PROBABLY WOULD NOT HAVE ATTRACTED MANY READERS, BECAUSE IT’S MORE FUN TO WATCH THE ENTERTAINMENT PUT OUT BY THE MEDIA THAN TO READ A SOBER ESSAY. 

    EVEN IF THESE WRITINGS HAD HAD MANY READERS, MOST OF THESE READERS WOULD SOON HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT THEY HAD READ AS THEIR MINDS WERE FLOODED BY THE MASS OF MATERIAL TO WHICH THE MEDIA EXPOSE THEM. IN ORDER TO GET OUR MESSAGE BEFORE THE PUBLIC WITH SOME CHANCE OF MAKING A LASTING IMPRESSION, WE’VE HAD TO KILL PEOPLE.UNQUOTE

    TED AND DAVID’S PARENTS, WANDA AND THEODORE R. KACZYNSKI, WERE ATHEISTS, WORKING-CLASS INTELLECTUALS WHO VALUED EDUCATION AND DEARLY WANTED THEIR SONS TO SUCCEED ON A HIGHER PLANE.

    ATHEISM AND RATIONALISM ARE CLOSELY RELATED; IF THE ELDER KACZYNSKIS WERE ATHEISTS, THEY PROBABLY RESPECTED REASON

    TED BABY HAS BEEN READING ROTHSCHIILD’S MISTRESS AYN RAND’S BOOKS TOO.  THE COMBINATION OF ATHEISM AND RATIONALISM IS FOUND IN AYN RAND, WITH WHOM THE UNABOMBER IS SOMETIMES COMPARED.



    THE UNABOMBER BEGINS HIS MANIFESTO BY DECLARING “THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES HAVE BEEN A DISASTER FOR THE HUMAN RACE. INDEED IT TOOK AWAY MAN FROM SPIRITUALITY.. BUT PEOPLE ARE COMING BACK TO SPIRITUALITY.. THEY DON’T NEED TO LIVE LIKE PIGS IN A CABIN FOR 25 YEARS.

    WHEN TED BABY SPEAKS OF ‘SATISFYING YOUR OWN NEEDS,’ ONE THINKS OF HIS OWN SOLITARY AND SELF-RELIANT LIFESTYLE. DOUBTLESS HE TOOK PRIDE IN HIS SOLITUDE, HIS INDIVIDUALITY. HIS ACHILLES HEEL WAS HIS LACK OF SPIRITUAL GROWTH; HE COULDN’T BE CONTENT IN HIS SOLITUDE, HE HAD TO CONNECT WITH OTHERS IN A NEGATIVE WAY, A VIOLENT WAY.

    TED BABY STOLE NUGGETS FROM THE WORKS OF MAD JEW SIGMUND FREUD.. THE UNABOMBER’S REMARKS ON “OVER-SOCIALIZATION” WERE INFLUENCED,  BY FREUD’S CIVILIZATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS.


    FREUD’S RATIONAL APPROACH WOULD BE CONGENIAL TO THE UNABOMBER, ND TED LOVED TO BE CALLED “RATIONAL”.

    LIKE MOST PEOPLE, THE UNABOMBER DOESN’T SEE HIS OWN FLAWS; HE INSISTS THAT HE’S SANE, HE CONTINUES TO BELIEVE IN THE JUSTICE OF HIS CAUSE, HE DOESN’T APOLOGIZE FOR HIS GRUESOME CRIMES.

    IT’S CLEAR THAT HE COMMITTED HIS CRIMES TO SATISFY HIS OWN PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS — HIS NEED TO BE SOMEBODY, TO DO SOMETHING, TO EXERCISE POWER—TO LEAVE A LASTING LEGACY.

    IN HIS OWN MIND, HOWEVER, HE COMMITTED HIS CRIMES FOR GOOD REASONS — TO PUBLICIZE HIS THEORIES, TO START A REVOLUTION, TO SAVE THE FUCKIN’ WORLD.

    THE SECRET AGENT OF FELLOW POLISH JEW JOSEPH CONRAD. INFLUENCED THE UNABOMBER—TED KACZYNSKI; HE WAS A GREAT FAN AND AS AN ADOLESCENT KEPT A COPY AT HIS BEDSIDE.

    HE IDENTIFIED STRONGLY WITH THE CHARACTER OF "THE PROFESSOR" AND ADVISED HIS FAMILY TO READ THE SECRET AGENT TO UNDERSTAND THE CHARACTER WITH WHOM HE FELT SUCH AN AFFINITY. DAVID FOSTER, THE LITERARY ATTRIBUTIONIST WHO ASSISTED THE FBI, SAID THAT KACZYNSKI "SEEMED TO HAVE FELT THAT HIS FAMILY COULD NOT UNDERSTAND HIM WITHOUT READING CONRAD"

    KACZYNSKI'S IDOLISATION OF THE CHARACTER WAS DUE TO THE TRAITS THAT THEY SHARED: DISAFFECTION, HOSTILITY TOWARD THE WORLD, AND BEING AN ASPIRING ANARCHIST. HOWEVER, IT DID NOT STOP AT MERE IDOLISATION. 

    KACZYNSKI USED "THE PROFESSOR" AS A SOURCE OF INSPIRATION, AND "FABRICATED SIXTEEN EXPLODING PACKAGES THAT DETONATED IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS". 

    AFTER HIS CAPTURE, KACZYNSKI REVEALED TO FBI AGENTS THAT HE HAD READ THE NOVEL A DOZEN TIMES, AND HAD SOMETIMES USED "CONRAD" AS AN ALIAS. 

    IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT KACZYNSKI HAD USED VARIOUS FORMULATIONS OF CONRAD'S NAME – CONRAD, KONRAD, AND KORZENIOWSKI, CONRAD'S ORIGINAL SURNAME – TO SIGN HIMSELF INTO SEVERAL HOTELS IN SACRAMENTO. 

    AS IN HIS YOUTH, KACZYNSKI RETAINED A COPY OF THE SECRET AGENT, AND KEPT IT WITH HIM WHILE LIVING AS A RECLUSE IN A HUT IN MONTANA

    THE UNABOMBER SAYS THAT THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEOLOGY SHOULD BE PRESENTED IN TWO FORMS: A POPULAR FORM, AND A SUBTLE FORM (THESE TWO FORMS ARE SOMETIMES CALLED THE “EXOTERIC” FORM AND THE “ESOTERIC” FORM).

    MOST PEOPLE HATE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONFLICT. FOR THIS REASON THEY AVOID DOING ANY SERIOUS THINKING ABOUT DIFFICULT SOCIAL ISSUES, AND THEY LIKE TO HAVE SUCH ISSUES PRESENTED TO THEM IN SIMPLE, BLACK-AND-WHITE TERMS: THIS IS ALL GOOD AND THAT IS ALL BAD. THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEOLOGY SHOULD THEREFORE BE DEVELOPED ON TWO LEVELS.

    ON THE MORE SOPHISTICATED LEVEL THE IDEOLOGY SHOULD ADDRESS ITSELF TO PEOPLE WHO ARE INTELLIGENT, THOUGHTFUL AND RATIONAL. THE OBJECT SHOULD BE TO CREATE A CORE OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE OPPOSED TO THE INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM ON A RATIONAL, THOUGHT-OUT BASIS, WITH FULL APPRECIATION OF THE PROBLEMS AND AMBIGUITIES INVOLVED, AND OF THE PRICE THAT HAS TO BE PAID FOR GETTING RID OF THE SYSTEM. 

    IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT TO ATTRACT PEOPLE OF THIS TYPE, AS THEY ARE CAPABLE PEOPLE AND WILL BE INSTRUMENTAL IN INFLUENCING OTHERS. THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE ADDRESSED ON AS RATIONAL A LEVEL AS POSSIBLE. FACTS SHOULD NEVER INTENTIONALLY BE DISTORTED AND INTEMPERATE LANGUAGE SHOULD BE AVOIDED. 

    THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT NO APPEAL CAN BE MADE TO THE EMOTIONS, BUT IN MAKING SUCH APPEAL CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO AVOID MISREPRESENTING THE TRUTH OR DOING ANYTHING ELSE THAT WOULD DESTROY THE INTELLECTUAL RESPECTABILITY OF THE IDEOLOGY.

    ON A SECOND LEVEL, THE IDEOLOGY SHOULD BE PROPAGATED IN A SIMPLIFIED FORM THAT WILL ENABLE THE UNTHINKING MAJORITY TO SEE THE CONFLICT OF TECHNOLOGY VS. NATURE IN UNAMBIGUOUS TERMS. 

    BUT EVEN ON THIS SECOND LEVEL THE IDEOLOGY SHOULD NOT BE EXPRESSED IN LANGUAGE THAT IS SO CHEAP, INTEMPERATE OR IRRATIONAL THAT IT ALIENATES PEOPLE OF THE THOUGHTFUL AND RATIONAL TYPE.

    WHEN THE UNABOMBER LOOKS AT HISTORY, HE FINDS THAT TECHNOLOGY DIDN’T DEVELOP IN MOST CIVILIZATIONS, THAT TECHNOLOGY IS AN HISTORICAL ANOMALY. THEREFORE, HE BELIEVES THAT TECHNOLOGY CAN BE DESTROYED, THE GOOD OL’ DAYS CAN BE BROUGHT BACK

    ACCORDING TO THE UNABOMBER, THE LEFTIST WANTS TO WIELD POWER THROUGH A BIG ORGANIZATION, WHEREAS THE ANARCHIST (LIKE HIMSELF), WANTS POWER IN THE HANDS OF INDIVIDUALS AND SMALL GROUPS

    NEAR THE END OF HIS MANIFESTO, THE UNABOMBER TELLS US HOW WE CAN SPOT A LEFTIST:

    THE LEFTIST IS ORIENTED TOWARD LARGE SCALE COLLECTIVISM. HE EMPHASIZES THE DUTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL TO SERVE SOCIETY AND THE DUTY OF SOCIETY TO TAKE CARE OF THE INDIVIDUAL. HE HAS A NEGATIVE ATTITUDE TOWARD INDIVIDUALISM. HE OFTEN TAKES A MORALISTIC TONE. 

    HE TENDS TO BE FOR GUN CONTROL, FOR SEX EDUCATION AND OTHER PSYCHOLOGICALLY “ENLIGHTENED” EDUCATIONAL METHODS, FOR PLANNING, FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, FOR MULTICULTURALISM. HE TENDS TO IDENTIFY WITH VICTIMS. HE TENDS TO BE AGAINST COMPETITION AND AGAINST VIOLENCE, BUT HE OFTEN FINDS EXCUSES FOR THOSE LEFTISTS WHO DO COMMIT VIOLENCE. 

    HE IS FOND OF USING THE COMMON CATCH-PHRASES OF THE LEFT LIKE “RACISM,” “SEXISM,” “HOMOPHOBIA,” “CAPITALISM,” “IMPERIALISM,” “NEOCOLONIALISM,” “GENOCIDE,” “SOCIAL CHANGE,” “SOCIAL JUSTICE,” “SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.” 

    MAYBE THE BEST DIAGNOSTIC TRAIT OF THE LEFTIST IS HIS TENDENCY TO SYMPATHIZE WITH THE FOLLOWING MOVEMENTS: FEMINISM, GAY RIGHTS, ETHNIC RIGHTS, DISABILITY RIGHTS, ANIMAL RIGHTS, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

     ANYONE WHO STRONGLY SYMPATHIZES WITH ALL OF THESE MOVEMENTS IS ALMOST CERTAINLY A LEFTIST.


    TED KACZYNSKI HAD A RATHER EXTENSIVE COLLECTION OF BOOKS IN HIS MONTANA CABIN.

    THE BOOKS INCLUDED THESE TITLES, WHICH HAD SPECIAL RELEVANCE TO THE UNABOM MANIFESTO.   "CHINESE POLITICAL THOUGHT IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY", "THE ANCIENT ENGINEERS", "THE TECHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY", "THE TRUE BELIEVER", "VIOLENCE IN AMERICA” ,"YOUR CHANCE TO LIVE" ETC. .. TED BABY HAS LIFTED FROM THE WORKS OF GERMAN JEW ERIC HOFFER

    KACZYNSKI DID EXTENSIVE RESEARCH ON HOW TO SURVIVE IN THE WILDERNESS, AND COLLECTED PAMPHLETS SUCH AS THESE: "STALKING THE WILD ASPARAGUS" BY EUELL GIBBONS,

    KACZYNSKI ACQUIRED GIBBON'S BOOK SHORTLY AFTER LEAVING HARVARD, AND USED IT TO PRACTICE GATHERING WILD EDIBLE PLANTS IN FORESTS AROUND CHICAGO.


    ALMOST ALL TED HIS KACZYNSKI  MANIFESTO CONSISTS OF STOLEN IDEAS.. 



    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WHO CAN WRAP HIS HEAD AROUND THIS MANIFESTO ( WRITTEN BY A GENIUS OF 1Q 68 )  JUST BY SPEED READING ,   GIVES IT  A MEASLY RATING OF 1.5/ 10.

    THE SECRET AGENT OF FELLOW POLISH JEW JOSEPH CONRAD. INFLUENCED THE UNABOMBER—TED KACZYNSKI; HE WAS A GREAT FAN AND EVEN AS AN ADOLESCENT KEPT A COPY AT HIS BEDSIDE.  THIS IS WHY I ASK MODI, TO BURN THE COMMIE SECTIONS OF THE LIBRARIES OF JNU AND BRENNAN COLLEGE KANNUR.

    THAT REMINDS ME OF A BELGIAN JEW ( WORTH 100 MILLION USD ) CAPT CAJ VANDERPERRE WHO KEPT A MAGAZINE CONTAINING MY POEM ON HIS RATHER LARGE MAHOGANY DESK..  

    ONE DAY HIS SECRETARY REMOVED THE MAGAZINE FROM ITS PRIDE OFPLACE , AND HE FIRED HER WITHIN THE HOUR.  THE POEM WAS ABOUT A SHIPOWNER WHO WENT ON A LOSS MAKING AGING SHIP TO SIGN THE DEATH WARRANT -- TO BE SCRAPPED.  AFTER SIGNING HE WENT ON THE MONKEY ISLAND TO A SPOT WHERE HE AS A YOUNG OFFICER FIRST KISSED HIS WOULD BE WIFE ( THE CAPTAIN’S DAUGHTER ) UNDER A STARRY SUMMER NIGHT , AT SEA.



    I AM KEEPING MY CRITIQUE/ REVIEW AT THE LCD  ( LOWEST COMMON DEMOMINATOR )  LEVEL

    https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-ted-kaczynski-letter-to-an-anonymous-german







































    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE BY THEODORE KACZYNSKI, A REVIEW- CRITIQUE BY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL, Part 4

    $
    0
    0


    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 3, BELOW--


    In his manifesto Ted Kaczynski has made too many assumptions based on scanty information.. Lifting nuggets from works of previous authors does not make him right

    Ted baby assumes that man can be truly happy only when directly satisfying his daily needs—hunting and fishing for food, defending himself, maintaining his shelter, etc.—in other words, living in a simple relationship with Nature.

    BALLS TO TED FUCKIN’ KACZYNSKI

    This may be true of some dimwit misanthropes , but for others (the more sublimated) it’s quite the opposite: they find happiness precisely in minimizing the daily maintenance functions in favor of more interesting activities such as reflecting, abstract problem-solving, creating art, playing sports, pulling off business deals—you name it.   

    For them, to be bogged down exclusively in highly repetitive survival tasks with little time for contemplation would constitute a form of slavery.

    Small communal groups, close to the land, with low technology—has already been tried; it’s called the Dark Ages of Europe with people eating other humans . In such conditions the small group and the individual tend to be victimized not only by natural calamities ( Mother Nature) as drought and disease, but also by human marauders—the most successful of which, ironically, usually employ the best technology (iron vs. brass knives and spears and shields, composite bow or longbow vs. standard shortbow, guns vs. bows-and-arrows, etc.).

    Historically, to defend themselves such small groups have tended to seek the protection of more powerful groups—which of course leads to precisely the kind of disempowerment bemoaned by Ted baby..

    Ted Kaczynski  makes it clear that to save mankind he’s willing to sacrifice much of mankind (he admits that the transition from a complex, technology-based society to a simple one will be extremely traumatic)—the typical ends-justify-means thinking of the fanatic, amply and sickeningly demonstrated in the twentieth century by the likes of Stalin, Hitler and Mao.

    In Ted K’s post-revolution “utopia” one can well imagine humorless Inquisitors ferreting out and happily roasting closet technologists.  This is what happens when you are a frog in the well with tunnel vision.  

    TODAY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE  TO IMAGINE ANY CIRCUMSTANCE (SHORT OF THERMONUCLEAR WAR OR BIOLOGICAL HOLOCAUST, WHICH ARE NOT IMPOSSIBLE) THAT WOULD CAUSE MANKIND TO ABANDON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND RETREAT TO THE DARK AGES.  




    IN THE WEST MOST OFFICE STRESSED UNHAPPY PEOPLE TAKE OFF ON WEEKENDS TO COMMUNE WITH NATURE.. IN INDIA THE OFFICE STRESSED PEOPLE STAY AT HOME IN HARMONY WITH THEIR FAMILY..


    Ted baby considers himself a revolutionary who’s out to save mankind from itself. This is called delusion of a morbid mind.. 

    And he states that he mailed the bombs not so much to kill off evil technologists as to call attention to his all-important manifesto . Revolutionaries must be alerted and rallied so that when the crisis comes they will be ready to pounce.TEE HEEE.  

    Without some dramatic action, says Ted Baby the manifesto would never have come before the public—would have been lost in the daily media glut of “information.” 

    So he self-advertised by bombing a few “bad” guys. And it worked, didn’t it? 

    How else would he have induced The New York Times and The Washington Post to publish his tract?  How else would he have induced me to write this review or you to read it?  

    DID I BECOME THIS PLANETs NO 1 WRITER BY KILLING PEOPLE ?.. 

    READ MY MISSION STATEMENT..


    EVEN IN THIS INTERNET AGE,  TED BABY HAS FEW FOLLOWERS PUTTING HIS THOUGHTS ON INTERNET,  AND HE HAS NO TAKERS

    Ted baby’s  analysis of leftist psychology is a textbook example of psychological projection.
    Psychological projection is a defense mechanism people subconsciously employ in order to cope with difficult feelings or emotions. Psychological projection involves projecting undesirable feelings or emotions onto someone else, rather than admitting to or dealing with the unwanted feelings

    His anti-leftist obsession is moralistic and throws out the window any possibility of intersectionality
    Does tunnel visioned Ted baby have the cerebral wherewithal to  draw a line between acceptable technologies and unacceptable technologies?

    Some of Ted baby’s Jewish followers have gone GAGA over his 35,000 words of Unabomber “narrow spectrum” manifesto made in 25 years ..   

     Do you have any idea how many millions of words have been penned in this “broad spectrum “ blogsite in 10 years flat?.. 

    Ted baby speaks of huge change and revolution, yet did not have one single follower in his "FC", it was all him. No one bought into his ideologies no matter how interesting and thats pathetic. Shit, even the scientologists have more followers and their beliefs are way crazier!? Even today there are no takers for his morbid manifesto

    I am penning a 20 part blog series on Artificial Intelligence..   Right now I have paused it at part 10.  I know what Ted Kaczyanski is talkin’ about ..




    TED KACZYNSKI USED FC AS A SIGNATURE IN HIS BOMBINGS—WHICH IS A JEWISH SERIAL KILLERs SIGNATURE.. THIS SIGNATURE IS HIS UNDOING.. THIS IS WHY VADAKAYIL WILL RAPE HIS LEGACY WITHOUT GREASE.


    THE SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED IN ORDER TO COMMIT THE CRIME.   RATHER, IT SERVES THE EMOTIONAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS OF THE OFFENDER. THE SIGNATURE COMES FROM WITHIN THE PSYCHE OF THE OFFENDER AND IT REFLECTS A DEEP FANTASY NEED THAT THE KILLER HAS ABOUT HIS VICTIMS.

    STUPID FELLOW KACZYNSKI HAS CHERRY PICKED FROM MANY PAST WRITER TO FLESH OUT HIS MINDLESS MANIFESTO – SOME TOTALLY OUT OF CONTEXT TO BUTTRESS HIS MAD ARGUMENTS

    I DISAGREE WITH THE IDEA THAT A REVOLUTION WILL TAKE DOWN TECHNOLOGY. IS THERE ANYBODY ON THIS PLANET WHO AGREES WITH THIS CUNT TED’S  IDEA THAT TECHNOLOGY CAN BE KILLED BY A REVOLUTION?

    BALLS TO TED FUCKIN’ KACZYNSKI


    Ted Kaczynski fails miserably in deriving any convincing theory. He blames this vague "industrial society", or claims that we are enslaved by "technology", as if technology is the prime decider in who gets to be enslaved, not the Jews of the deep state—the people with power!

    The simple fact that he points out many of the disasters that capitalism has wreaked upon this world without once being critical of Rothschild’s capitalism  — the hegemonic moral, social, and economic system — is quite telling of the fact that you cannot find relevant and insightful, or even original social critique here.


    1. Dear Captain, Excellent critique, doodh ka doodh pani ka pani.

      Unbiased review coupled with perception, experience and exposure to various writers. The so called movie/Novel critics shall learn how to write a review.

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_22.html
      1. https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_24.html

        NONE OF THE JOURNALISTS ON THIS PLANET ARE WELL READ..

        EVEN IF THEY HAVE A PENCHANT TO READ GOOD BOOKS, THEY ARE TOO SLOW..

        I COULD NEVER GIVE KICK MAHAMERUs OF THIS PLANET INTO TE VADAKAYIL GARBAGE BIN, OR FLUSH THEM DOWN THE SHIT HOLE, IF I COULD NOT SPEED READ..

        IT IS UNFAIR TO CONDEMN ANYBODY UNLESS YOU READ ALL HIS ACCLAIMED WORKS..

        MANY CONMAN HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED AS INTELLECTUALS BECAUSE THEY WRITE IN "PURPLE PROSE" TO BAFFLE THE READERS..

        FOR EXAMPLE-- I DARE ANY COMMIE INTELLECTUAL ON THIS PLANET TO DEBATE KARL MARXs "DAS KAPITAL" WITH ME..
        CAN ANY ECONOMICS MAHA MERU ON THE PLANET EVEN UNDERSTAND WHY MODERN ECONOMICS IS BULLSHIT..


        NATIONS HAVE DEBT FAR BEYOND THEIR GDP AND CALL THEMSELVES RICH?



        THEIR GDP ITSELF IS INFLATED BULLSHIT CERTIFIED BY ROTHSCHILDs RATING AGENCIES..



        READ QUESTIONS TO QUORA FROM 686 TO 820 IN THE POST BELOW--
        https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/archived-questions-to-quora-from-capt.html

        PEOPLE ALL OVER THE PLANET ARE WAKING UP-- THERE IS A SILENT REVOLUTION..

        ROTHSCHILD AGENTS DATTA SAMANT SCREWED THE MUMBAI MILLWORKERS.. TODAY PRIME MILL REAL ESTATE /PROPERTY IS INFESTED WITH ROTHSCHILDs AGENTS..

        DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES..

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutta_Samant

        COMMIE SA DANGE WAS A ROTHSCHILD AGENT..

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shripad_Amrit_Dange

        HE WENT TO MOSCOW TO MEET STALIN AND IMPORT ARMS INTO INDIA FOR A BLOODY REVOLUTION TO BRING DOWN NEHRU..

        READ THE LAST PART OF THE POST BELOW WHERE COMRADES AJOY GHOSH, S.A. DANGE, C. RAJESWARA RAO AND M. BASAVA PUNNAIAH WENT AS STOWAWAYS ON A RUSSIAN SHIP FROM CALCUTTA KIDDERPORE DOCKS TO MEET STALIN IN MOSCOW--ALL ARRANGED BY TRAITOR COMMIE JOURNALIST NIKHIL CHKRAVARTTY..

        http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/08/chinese-revolution-biggest-genocide-on.html

        NOW THEY KOSHER DEEP STATE ( WITH PAKISTANI ISI AND PRAYER BREAKFAST GROUP ) IS TRYING TO BRING HONGKONG STYLE RIOTS TO INDIA..

        HONGKONG RIOTS ARE LED FROM THE SHADOWS BY JEWISH MONEY LAUNDERERS..

        INDIA MUST KILL THESE RIOTS WITHIN THIS WEEK..USE PELLETS/ INDELIBLE DYE CARTRIDGES/ ARREST PEOPLE HIDING FACES.. DO IT NOW.. DONT CARE FOR ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA OR JEWISH RULERS OF EU..

        HOFFA WAS SOMEBODY LIKE DATTA SAMANT-- DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES. WHEN JEWISH DEEP STATE TELLS YOU TO GET OFF THE UNION LEADERS CHAIR, THE UNION LEADER MUST DO IT..

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Hoffa

        capt ajit vadakayil
        ..

    .
    Capt ajit vadakayil declares that Ted Kaczynski is not a thinker at all.. 

    I would never call Shakuntala Devi or Garry Kasparov a thinker.. Ted baby  decries the ruling classes but without tying them to the profit motive and capitalism, somehow only to "technology".  

    Education is all about training the mind to think.  It is not what you think which matters.. It is about how you think. When I conducted job interview ( while working in shore office ), I never asked a question.. I gave the candidates something to read and asked them to come back the next day and ask me questions.

    Before you put your mouth into motion, your brain must be in gear.. Unless you are Vadakayil whose responses are lightning fast coming from the subconscious brain lobe.

    The most fundamental attack on human freedom is to prevent critical thinking..  This is what the communist revolutions of Jew Rothschild achieved..  

    By forcing humans to go back to caves what is Ted Kaczynski up to? 

    Critical thinking is  not cynicism —which is a madness of wisdom. A cynic like a fool knows the price of everything but not the value.. Price is what you pay, value is what you get—is can be intangible.. 

    Add value to your life.  By staying in a hole like a pig for 25 years, cut off from family and society  what value did a bitter cynic like Ted baby add to his miserable life ? 

    A cynic can never be creative.. His DNA programme is corrupted.  

    On my ship when I sense a cynic during shipboard meetings  jumping into conclusions ( consistently ) missing the truth , I warn him in private ..I have place only for teamwork on my ship , like on a soccer field..


    Imagine marrying a cynical woman. Abraham Lincoln married a cynical shrew addicted to Laudanum.. 



    Ted baby has committed intellectual treason.   The whole world can forgive Ted Kaczynski, but Vadakayil will not.  

    I will tear his legacy to bits.. 

    This blog series will be printed and posted to him in jail..


    TED KACZYNSKI HAS A VERY SHALLOW MIND FOR A MATH EXPERT..  IT IS NOT TECHNOLOGY AS SUCH THAT CURTAILS HUMAN FREEDOM ,  ITS SYSTEMS OF HIERARCHY AND DOMINATION THAT HAVE REACHED THEIR CULMINATION IN CAPITALIST SOCIETY.. 


    THERE IS NOTHING WRONG IN MAKING DIGITAL PAYMENTS BY CARD ( AFTER DEMONETIZATION ). IN INDIA TODAY EVEN A BEGGAR ECCEPTS CARD PAYMENTS..  

    BUT IF THE INTERNET IF CUT OFF LIKE IN KASHMIR OR NE STATES ( DURING CURRENT CAA RIOTS ) , THE PEOPLE MUST HAVE CURRENCY NOTES IN THEIR POCKETS TO SURVIVE.. 

    MODI MOST PRINT MORE 20/ 50 / 100 RUPEE CURRENCY DENOMINATIONS..


    BELOW: HER MENTAL AND PHYSICAL FEATURES SHOW THAT HE IS A VICTIM OF FETAL ALCOHOL



    JEW TED KACZYNSKI IS AN ECO-FASCIST JUST LIKE JEWESS GRETA THUNBERG WHO IS THREATENDENDEDING US WITH MASS EXTINCTION— ALL READING OUT FROM A PIECE OF PAPER .. SHE IS TUTORED BY THE JEWISH DEEP STATE






    ECO-FASCISTS BELIEVE THAT LIVING IN THE ORIGINAL REGIONS A RACE IS MEANT TO HAVE ORIGINATED IN AND SHUNNING MULTICULTURALISM IS THE ONLY WAY TO SAVE THE PLANET THEY PRIORITIZE ABOVE ALL ELSE.  

    TED KACZYNSKI WILL NEVER ALLOW A BLACK MAN TO BE HIS NEIGHBOR


    BELOW: HITLER WAS A JEW.. ALL NAZI TOP OFFICERS WERE JEWS OR MARRIED TO JEWESSES..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/10/if-zionist-jews-created-isis-who.html




    The Danava Civilization from Kerala taught this planet agriculture.   Meat eating people were converted to vegans 12,000 years ago. 



    According to anarcho-primitivism, the shift from hunter-gatherer to agricultural subsistence gave rise to social stratification, coercion, alienation, and overpopulation..

    Ted Kaczynski has written a pea brained critique on this subject .. nuggets stolen from Czech Jew  John Zerzan

    Zerzan himself visited Kaczynski before his 1998 conviction

    Jew Rothschild leads both globalization and anti-globalisation movements—it is all about control.    

    He leads the Capitalist mill owner and also the union leader..

    Below: Jew Rothschild gave Jew Lenin this call



    Seattle World Trade Organization protests of 1999, also called Battle of Seattle, a series of marches, direct actions, and protests carried out from November 28 through December 3, 1999, that disrupted the World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial Conference in Seattle, Washington.


    1. Captain, the Supreme-Consciousness (BrahmAn) knows everything and consists of everything. Aakasha is the universal record/knowledge-keeping system which could be accessed by the Sages & Enlightened-people like Tesla and allowed creation of many inventions/innovations. But Aakasha exists due to BrahmAn. You have revealed that the entire journey of a soul (small-fragment seperated by BrahmAn from itself) is to learn & give feedback to the BrahmAn. Whenever things go wrong in the Universe, BrahmAn intervenes by creating an Avatar. But why would a being that knows everything, creates concepts like time/karma/life/death/etc., intervene as an Avatar, etc. do all this activity if it already knows everything ? Is this just a big activity trap for BrahmAn itself to keep itself busy ? And if so, why not just create a decent-world where everything is ok and there is no mutation/degradation which will need to be corrected by intervening in form of an Avatar ?
      1. BRAHMAN EXPECTS THE INDIVIDUAL SOUL, TO CREATE MORE OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER OF THE KNOWLEDGE BANK THE FIELD HOLDS .

        BRAHMAN DOES NOT EXPECT MAN TO GO BACK TO THE STONE AGE LIKE WHAT TED KACZYNSKI WANTS..
        MAN IS JUST A CHANNEL THROWN IN THE MIDST OF MAYA.... WITH QUANTUM PHYSICS ALL MARVEL THE THE EXTENT OF MAYA

        EVERYTHING IS THE LILA ( PLAY )OF GOD ..

    TED KACZYNSKI HAS LIFTED FROM ALDOUS HUXLEY’S “ BRAVE NEW WORLD”..   THE BOOK WAS BANNED IN INDIA IN 1967. 

    TED BABY COPIED THE STYLE OF FROM ALDOUS HUXLEY PUTTING IN UPPER CASE WORDS LIKE CHAAT MASALA IN HIS MANIFESTO

    ED BABY -- WE WILL HAVE INTELLIGENT MACHINES, THE RESULT OF WHICH WILL EITHER BE THAT HUMANS ARE ERADICATED OR, IF WE ARE NOT, THAT WE WILL ALL (PERHAPS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A SMALL ELITE) LIVE LIKE DOMESTICATED ANIMALS IN A SOCIETY RESEMBLING THE ONE DESCRIBED BY ALDOUS HUXLEY IN BRAVE NEW WORLD.

    ALDOUS HUXLEY IS THE GRANDSON OF  THOMAS HENRY HUXLEY WHO PROPAGATED THE THEORY OF MAD MAN AND ROTHSCHILD’S AGENT CHARLES DARWIN.


    TED CLAIMS THAT HE KILLED PEOPLE IN ORDER THAT HE BE HEARD. WITHOUT SUCH AN EVENT, HE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN NOTICED.. HE IS STILL UN-NOTICED.

    KACZYNSKI SPENT 35,000 WORDS  DISSECTING THE FLAWS OF INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND HOW TO BRING ITS' FALL, WITHOUT OFFERING HIS THOUGHT OF THE POST-INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY HE DREAMED OF. TED KACZYNSKI IS EXTREMELY UNSTABLE IN HIS THOUGHT PROCESS

    THE COURSES OF OUR LIVES ARE NOW DICTATED BY LARGE CORPORATIONS AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES AND IF WE HAVE GRIEVANCES AGAINST THEM, WE ARE HELPLESS..  

    RATHER THAN PURSUING REFORM AND MODERATION, KACZYNSKI SEEKS TO INITIATE A REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT THAT WILL AIM TO ‘KILL’ TECHNOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION. THIS IS A GOOD AIM FOR A REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT, HE ARGUES, SINCE IT IS A SIMPLE AIM THAT HAS A CLEAR CRITERION FOR SUCCESS, AND ONCE SUCCESS IS ACHIEVED, THE REVOLUTION WILL BE IRREVERSIBLE.

    CAN ANYBODY SAY WHICH BROWN BLOGGER CAUSED POSTERS OF MARX / LENIN/ STALIN TO DISAPPEAR FROM THE INDIAN STREETS ?  WHO HAS RAPED THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA WITHOUT GREASE..

    BALLS TO TED FUCKIN’ KACZYNSKI


    TED WAS INFLUENCED BY THE IDEOLOGY  OF GERMAN JEW ALEXANDER GROTHENDIECK , A MATHEMATICIAN  , WHO WAS THE MAIN EDITOR OF THE  BULLETINS OF  SURVIVRE ET VIVRE ( SURVIVING AND LIVING ).. 

    AFTER ALEXANDER GROTHENDIECK RETIRED HE WENT INTO SECLUSION.   HE LIVED ALONE IN A SMALL HOUSE IN LASSERRE, ARIÈGE, A REMOTE VILLAGE AT THE FOOT OF THE PYRENEES.

    NONE OF THESE BASTARDS EVER WROTE ON WHO USA SPRAYED AGENT ORANGE ALL OVER VIETNAM AND CAMBODIA TO KILL FLORA AND FAUNA.


    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS THE ONLY MAN ON THIS PLANET TO SAY A GOOD WORD ABOUT POL POT



    ITS AIM, AS ALEXANDRE GROTHENDIECK EXPLAINS, IS "THE STRUGGLE FOR THE SURVIVAL OF THE HUMAN SPECIES, AND EVEN OF LIFE IN SHORT, THREATENED BY THE GROWING ECOLOGICAL IMBALANCE CAUSED BY AN INDISCRIMINATE USE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND BY SUICIDAL SOCIAL MECHANISMS, AND ALSO THREATENED BY MILITARY CONFLICTS LINKED TO THE PROLIFERATION OF MILITARY APPARATUSES AND THE ARMS INDUSTRIES ”.





    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL SAYS THAT JEW THEODORE KACZYNSKI AND ZODIAC KILLER IS THE SAME MAN..    

    BUT THE JEWS WHO MONOPOLISE THE MEDIA WILL DENY THIS.

    TED KACZYNSKIs  KILLING MODUS OPERANDI  IS A DIRECT LIFT FROM THE ZODIAC KILLER..  

    KACZYNSKI LEFT HIS JOB AT BERKELEY SHORTLY AFTER THE ZODIAC KILLED TWO VICTIMS NORTH OF BERKELEY IN BENICIA.    

    HE WAS TERRIBLY NERVOUS AT THAT TIME..


    THOUGH THE ZODIAC KILLER MAY ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OTHER CRIMES, THERE ARE THE FIVE MURDERS AND TWO ATTEMPTED MURDERS OFFICIALLY ATTRIBUTED TO HIM.

    BELOW: ZODIAC KILLER FIRST EASY CIPHER CODE 
    The Zodiac's Z 340 cipher has long been considered by many cryptology experts to be one of the most challenging ciphers in history. It was mailed to The San Francisco Chronicle along with a humorous greeting card and a shirt fragment of one of the Zodiac's victims. (Credit: Federal Bureau of Investigation)

    BELOW: ZODIAC KILLERs SECOND DIFFICULT CIPHER CODE 
    A partial solution to the Z 340 cipher.

    BELOW: TED KACZYNSKIs AND ZODIAC KILLERs HANDWRITING WAS THE SAME.. FBI KNEW IT WAS THE SAME MAN.. THEY KEPT IT A SECRET.. 

    This cipher, mailed to the Chronicle, was sent along with a map of the San Francisco Bay area. The code, Zodiac wrote, would identify where he had set a bomb.  (Image courtesy of writer; public domain)

    The Zodiac's map of the San Francisco Bay area features a cross-hair symbol on the peak of Mt. Diablo. (Image courtesy of writer; public domain)

    AT THE TIME OF THE MURDERS, KACZYNSKI SOMEWHAT RESEMBLED THE COMPOSITE SKETCH OF THE ZODIAC.

    KACZYNSKI’S  PUERILE HANDWRITING WAS VERY SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE ZODIAC

    TED USED HIS OWN, COMPLEX CODED METHODS TO WRITE A SECRET DIARY OF HIS CRIMINAL LIFE.









    BELOW: TED KACZYNSKI KNEW THAT HIS HANDWRITING WAS COMPROMISED.. STUDENTS OF HIS MATH CLASS KNEW HIS HANDWRITING...  

    IN HIS NEW AVATAR AS UNABOMBER TED WOULD USE TYPEWRITERS.

    Zodiac Killer Letter

    THIS IS WHY TED BABY KEPT THREE TYPEWRITERS IN HIS CRAMPED CABIN.

    THE CAREER OF THE UNABOMBER BEGAN SHORTLY AFTER THE ZODIAC DISAPPEARED.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zodiac_Killer

    TED KACZYNSKI LIVED IN THE BAY AREA FROM 1967 TO 1969, DURING THE TIME THE ZODIAC CLAIMED AT LEAST FIVE LIVES IN LATE 1968 AND THE SUMMER AND FALL OF 1969.

    ALSO, A MAN SIMILAR IN APPEARANCE TO KACZYNSKI WAS SEEN NEAR ONE OF THE CRIME SCENES.

    KACZYNSKI ONCE SIGNED A HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOK WITH A SYMBOL SIMILAR TO THE ZODIAC’S INFAMOUS LOGO.

    THE ZODIAC ALSO TOLD ONE VICTIM THAT HE RESIDED IN MONTANA NEAR LINCOLN
    BOTH THE UNABOMBER AND THE ZODIAC TOOK IN BRAGGING IN LETTERS TO NEWSPAPERS -- BOTH WROTE TO THE CHRONICLE -- AND IN RIDICULING INVESTIGATORS.

    JEWS SPONSORING JEWS ?

    EVEN TEDs  MATH PHD WAS IN A EASY FIELD OF GEOMETRY , THIS IS THE WAY JEWS ARE SPONSORED BY JEWS.

    Both UNABOMBER and  ZODIAC made references to opera, literature and Norse myths.

    Both demanded their words be published on the front pages of newspapers on penalty of death for innocents if not done.

    * Both threatened to bomb mass transit.
    * Both left drawings of crossed lines inside circles at crime scenes.
    * Both used crossed lines inside circles as signatures.
    * Both sent taunting messages to police and victims.
    * Both usually used Double postage.   This is a signature of a serial killer and a dead give away.

    Both wrote checkmark "r"'s, three stroke "k"'s, five stroke "m"'s and had many other handwriting matches.

    * Both commented on the bounty put on their head.
    * Both were filled with hatred and a desire for revenge against society
    * Both owned and used Winchester Western .22 Super X ammo.
    * Both had guns with flashlights attached to the barrel.
    * Kaczynski shot a miner with a rifle - Zodiac threatened to shoot school kids on a bus with a rifle

    Both had an unusual walk - Officer Fouke said the man he saw at the Stine crime scene walked with a "lumbering gait...a semi-limp", a girl at Lake Berryessa observed that a man watching them who may have been the Zodiac "favored one leg over the other", and David Kaczynski said his brother Ted was "noticably pigeon-toed" and that it "affected the way he walked".

    * Both had knowledge of Deer Lodge, Montana.

    Kaczynski taught at U Cal Berkeley from 1967 to 1969, a position for which he interviewed in the Fall/Winter of 1966.   So he was in the SF Bay area for all the key dates of Zodiac activity. In all the public records, there are no conflicts between Kaczynski and known Zodiac murder and mailing dates.

    A COMPARISON OF SHARED WORD USAGE, PHRASES AND STYLES BY THE ZODIAC AND KACZYNSKI

    Z = Zodiac K = Kaczynski/Unabomber

    Z = I hope you enjoy your selves when I have my Blast. Jolly Roger Card.

    K = For these reasons, I want to get my revenge in one big blast. GX18-2003F, p. 11.


    Z = At the moment the children are safe from the bomb because it is so massive to dig in & the triger mech requires much work to get it adjusted just right. Belli Letter, 1969.

    K = Its no fun having to spend all your evenings and weekends preparing dangerous mixtures, filing trigger mechanisms out of scraps of metal .... New York Times Letter, 1995.


    Z = I gave the cops som bussy work to do to keep them happy. Seven-Page Letter, 1969.

    K = This seems to us a thoroughly contemptible way for the human race to end up, and we doubt that many people would find fulfilling lives in such pointless busy-work. Unabomber Manifesto, 1995.


    Z = This is the murderer of the 2 teenagers last Christmass at Lake Herman & the girl on the 4th of July near the golf course in Vallejo. To prove I killed them I shall state some facts which only I & the police know. Three-Part Cipher, 1969.

    K = To prove that we are the ones who planted the bomb at U. Of Cal. last May we will mention a few details that could be known only to us and the FBI who investigated the incident. S.F. Examiner Letter, 1985.


    Z = The police shall never catch me, because I have been too clever for them. Seven-Page letter, 1969.

    K = And it doesn't appear that the FBI is going to catch us any time soon. New York Times letter, 1995.


    Z = 2 cops pulled a goof. Seven-Page letter, 1969.

    K = The FBI is a joke. New York Times letter, 1995.


    Z = As of yet I have left no fingerprints behind me contrary to what the police say. Seven-Page Letter, 1969.

    K = Contrary to what the FBI has suggested, our bombing at the California Forestry Association was in no way inspired by the Oklahoma City bombing. New York Times Letter, 1995.


    Z = This is the murderer of the 2 teenagers last Christmass ... July 31, 1969 Letter (Chronicle).
    This is the Zodiac speaking. Numerous correspondences, 1969 through 1971.

    K = This is a message from the terrorist group FC. New York Times Letter, April 24, 1995.
    This is a message from FC. Tom Tyler Letter, June 30, 1995.


    Z = I promised to punish them if they did not comply, by anilating a full School Buss. But now school is out for the summer, so I punished them in another way. Mt. Diablo Letter, 1970.

    K = The people who are pushing all this growth and progress garbage deserve to be severely punished. New York Times Letter, 1995. 

    Z = By the way it could be rather messy if you try to bluff me. Seven-Page Letter, 1969.

    K = A special case of Theorem (b) was proved (in effect) in [6, proof of Theorem 6] by means of a rather messy lemma. T.J. Kaczynski. Boundary Functions and Sets of Curvilinear Convergence for Continuous Functions. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 141 (Jul., 1969), 107-125, p. 124.

    Z = [Called a violent movie] "deplorable".

    K = [Called OKC bombing] "deplorable".

    The ones above are some that I considered most compelling and a few of my own. The entire list and analysis by Doug Oswell is excellent and can be seen here:


    The shared word usage of Kaczynski and Zodiac is remarkable, and unlike what we see in any other Z suspect.


    1. Both use the word "So" to begin several of their thoughts.
    2. Both use the phrase "By the Way" to begin several of their thoughts.
    3. Use of "is is" in sentences.
    4. Both use the words "To prove" at the beginning of sentences followed by information  they felt provided proof of authenticity

    5. Both draw a full line across the page to separate thoughts. This is a signature 

    BALLS TO TED FUCKIN’ KACZYNSKI


































    1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/bigg-boss-13-arhaan-khan-threatens-to-throw-acid-on-sidharth-shukla-netizens-want-police-to-take-strict-action/articleshow/72950028.cms

      THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND NCW IN FOREIGN PAYROLL HAS ALWAYS BEEN LENIENT TO ACID THROWERS..

      THROWING ACID OF A WOMANs FACE IS WORSE THAN RAPE..

      I KNOW THE PAIN / TISSUE DAMAGE OF SULPHURIC ACID ON THE HUMAN BODY..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/06/sulphuric-acid-carriage-dangers-on.html

      WE ASK THIS FELLOW AARHAN KHAN IS JAILED , NOW !

      WE THE PEOPLE WILL BRING DOWN COLORs TV, SALMAN KHANS CAREER AND BIGG BOSS SHOW..

      BE WARNED..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/12/sulphuric-acid-on-chemical-tankers-capt.html

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/01/dubious-role-of-bilderberg-club-created.html


      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

      PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITE OF--
      COLORS TV MD
      BIGG BOSS 13 PRODUCER
      SALMAN KHAN
      PMO
      PM MODI
      DGPs OF ALL STATES
      GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
      PRESIDENT OF INDIA
      VP OF INDIA
      SPEAKER LOK SABHA
      SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
      CJI BOBDE
      ATTORNEY GENERAL
      ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
      ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
      LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
      ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
      AJIT DOVAL
      RAW
      IB
      NIA
      ED
      CBI
      AMIT SHAH
      HOME MINISTRY
      DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
      ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
      I&B MINISTER/ MINISTRY STATE - CENTRAL
      NCW MAIN/ STATES
      REKHA SHARMA
      SWATI MALLIWAL











    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    THEODORE KACZYNSKI THE UNABOMBER IS ALSO ZODIAC KILLER AND TYLENOL KILLER, part 5 – CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

    $
    0
    0



    THE REASON WHY THEODORE KACZYNSKI IS UNABOMBER,  ZODIAC KILLER,  TYLENOL KILLER IS MENTIONED IN PART 4 , BELOW--




    Ted Kaczynski places the unjustified ethical claim that individual freedom is the ultimate good at the centre of his argument.   This obsession with individualism blinds him to the possibility that collective behaviours may not be considered a negative, as well as pushing him to the belief that all people are fundamentally driven by a cynical self-interest and meanness in all their behaviour.

    BASTARD TED KACZYNSKI HAS NEVER KNOWN TEAMWORK IN HIS LIFE

    There is nothing inherently anti-freedom about the invention of the calculator, or the computer. Faster/ safer travel, faster / better communications like email/ skype –we all know what it is .The increase in productivity they bring about could easily be utilised to allow people to work fewer hours and have greater freedom. . 

    Modern technology actually provides the potential for unprecedented levels of freedom. Rather than seeking to destroy it, we should seek to change the ideologies that command it to be destructive of nature and encroaching on freedom. 



    The Indian ashrama system of Vanaprastha (  rooted - writing ) / Sanyasa ( uprooted- teaching  ) addresses this perfectly..  

    There is a time for everything.. 



    THE WHITE MAN HAS ALWAYS COME TO INDIA TO ABSORB WISDOM




    In sanyasa , you don’t destroy technology—you deliberately stay aloof.  You write / teach and give back to society ..


    The technical part of Vedas ( Part 2 Brahmanas / Part 3 Aranyakas ) were written during Vanaprasta stage . Aranya literally means forest in Sanskrit and Malayalam.

    Overall, Ted Kaczynski’s arguments never strong enough to stand up to scrutiny. And his solution is not only absurd but impossible.  

    He was definitely right that nobody would have paid attention to his work if he hadn’t killed people—he admits it .

    This aint so because of some grand conspiracy, however.  It’s simply because it’s USELESS like shit























    COMMENTS MADE IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED..

    MAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW--

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_19.html




    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    THEODORE KACZYNSKI THE UNABOMBER IS ALSO ZODIAC KILLER AND TYLENOL KILLER, part 6 – CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

    $
    0
    0

    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 5, BELOW--






    MANY TIMES MY BOSSES ASHORE ( AND IN WEATHER ROUTING SHORE OFFICES ) WANTED ME TO REVEAL HOW I DID UNBELIEVABLE THINGS..   

    THEY WANTED TO KNOW HOW MY SHIP DID THREE TIMES THE SPEED OF OTHER SHIPS IN THE SAME AREA.. 

    MIND YOU SHIPS ARE TRACKED ON EVERY COMPUTER IN THE SHORE OFFICE –EVERY METRE OF THE SHIP MOVEMENT. . WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY.. 

    I NEVER TOLD THEM. 

    APUN BHI VADAKAYIL” WAS NOT AN OPTION.. LIVES WOULD BE LOST.. 


    REASON OTHERS, WHO ARE NOT GOOD AS ME , WOULD DO IT AND SINK THEIR SHIPS. I DID IT NOT TO PROVE A POINT TO MYSELF ( I AM BEYOND THAT ) , BUT FOR SAFETY OF MY SHIP AND CREW.. 


    I HAVE USED MY SHIP AS A SURF BOARD IN MOUNTANOUS SEAS, --   THERE ,  I HAVE SAID IT .

    I DID IT AT NIGHT SO AS NOT TO ALARM  MY CREW.. 

    WHEN I LOADED PARCEL CHEMICALS , I DID TEN TIMES MORE THINKING THAN THE REST OF THE CAPTAINS..  I WAS NEVER IN FOOLs PARADISE,  AND THIS CAN BE STRESSFUL.. 

    IN MY CHEMICAL BLOGS I DON’T REVEAL EVERYTHING..  NEVER GIVE GRENADES TO  MONKEYS.. 




    NONE OF THE POINTS MENTIONED IN TED KACZYNSKIs UNABOMBER MANIFESTO ARE ORIGINAL..   NOT ONE SINGLE ONE OF THE 35,000 WORD MANIFESTO. 

    ALL, 100% ,  HAVE BEEN COLLECTED AS GOLDEN NUGGETS  FROM WORKS OF PAST AUTHORS ( SOME WERE INTELLECTUAL GIANTS  ) FOR QUARTER CENTURY AND THEN MERGED INTO A KITCHIDI ( POTPOURRI ) SANS CONTEXT AND PERIMETER..  THAT TOO USING “PURPLE PROSE” TO SOUND AS A GENIUS .. 

    I COULD GLEAN THIS ONLY BECAUSE I AM A SPEED READER. 

    FOLLOWING THE MENTION OF RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE UNABOMBER STRESSES ALMOST ALL THESE REGULATIONS ARE NECESSARY IN MODERN SOCIETY AND CAN THEREFORE NOT BE ELIMINATED 

    SO FUCKIN’ WHAT ? 

    I HAD MY OWN REGULATIONS ARE SEA—BY VIRTUE OF BEING A CAPTAIN.. 

    SOMETIMES FOREIGN OFFICERS ( ESPECIALLY CROATIANS ) DARED TO ASK ME  “BUT CAPTAIN SUCH A RULE IS NOT THERE ANYWHERE”..    I TOLD THEM BRUSQUELY “ THIS IS MY OWN LAW AND YOU SHALL FOLLOW IT ,  IF YOU WANT TO SAIL ANYMORE ON MY SHIP: 

    I STARTED SEGREGATING PLASTICS ON MY SHIP AS EARLY AS 1994. 

    I HAD A STICKER ON MY CAR— “SAY NO TO PLASTICS”  “SAY NO TO DRUGS” , ON REAR FENDER ..  ONE  MAN IN CALICUT  ASKED ME IF I WORK FOR CBI.

    PLASTICS ARE STILL SCREWING INDIA –AND WE ARE ALMOST IN YEAR 2020 ... 

    I HAD MY OWN SAMPLING REGULATIONS.. NOW I AM APPLYING IT TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE --  DATA SAMPLING..

    I HAD MY OWN CALIBRATION REGULATIONS..   I BLED PEOPLE PHYSICALLY WHO FLOUTED THESE CRITICAL SAFETY REGULATIONS..  

    ONE OF MY BATCHMATEs VEERESH MALIK ASKED ME   " AJIT,  I HEARD THAT YOU SLAPPED A JUNIOR OFFICER EIGHT TIMES IN A ROW ? .. THE GRAPEVINE IS ABUZZ " ..   

    I REPLIED "INDEED , WHEN IT COMES TO SAFETY OF LIFE , I HAVE ZERO TOLERANCE..  THE CHAIN IS ONLY AS STRONG AS THE WEAKEST LINK" 

    I HAD MY OWN REGULATIONS ON HOW TO RUN AUTOMATED UNMANNED MACHINERY.. 

    I HAD MY OWN DYNAMIC RISK ASSESSMENT FORM.,  WHERE I KEPT THE CERTAINTY SWITCH ( GO/ NO GO” IN MY POCKET –FOR VETO. 
    I HAD MY OWN ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS METHOD.. I THREW AWAY THE COMPANYs

    SOFTWARE..  TED BABY CANNOT DO ROOTCAUSE ANALYSIS FOR NUTS.. 


    I REJECTED CARGOES -- AND THIS CAUSED POWERS THAT BE TO BAY FOR MY BLOOD. 


    I HAS MY OWN FORM FOR : ENCLOSED PACES ENTRY AND HOT WORK PERMIT..   MY BOSSES TOLD ME THAT THESE ARE NO IMO / ISM CODE/ SMS APPROVED FORMS.. I TOLD THEM TO CATCH AND SWING -- NAY--  FUCK OFF. 



    I BANNED TOLUENE SPRAY.. 


    I RE-DEFINED THE IBC CODE MEANING OF " LUNG DEMAND "..  NO CAPTAIN DARES TO TELL IMO TO FUCK THEMSELVES AND FUCK THEMSELVES GOOD. 


     I DID NOT ALLOW RETURN CURRENT TO FLOW BACK TO THE WELDING MACHINE THROUGH THE STEEL HULL..  I BOUGHT A RETURN CURRENT CABLE..

    I INTRODUCED THE CONCEPT OF MINIMUM BOW HEIGHT..

     http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/01/naive-sailor-sinking-ships-capt-ajit.html 

    I REFUSED TO DO PLANNED MAINTENANCE..   

    I ONLY SURVIVED BECAUSE ALL TOP GUNS OF EVERY COMPANY I WORKED , ADMIRED MY GUTS AND COURAGE OF CONVICTIONS..  MY SHIT DID NOT SMELL FOR THE TOP BOSS. HE KNEW THAT I CUT DOWN BUDGET EXPENSES BY 40%..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/12/predictive-maintenance-on-chemical.html

    THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF THESE –  VADAKAYIL SPECIALS.   IF TED KACZYNSKI WAS ON MY SHIP, I WOULD HAVE KICKED HIS KOSHER ASS.

    IF TED KACZYNSKI IS SOUTH POLE, VADAKAYIL IS NORTH POLE..   BALLS TO THIS MINDLESS KOSHER CUNT,,  

    INITIALLY THERE IS RESISTANCE FROM “REFUSENIKS” AMONG SHIPs OFFICERS..    THEN PEOPLE USE THEIR OWN COMMONSENSE/ CONSCIENCE A AND MARVEL, WHAT A VISIONARY, WE ARE SERVING UNDER.. 

    TODAY ALL THESE PERSONAL VADAKAYIL REGULATIONS ARE UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED MAIN STREAM AT SEA BY IMO..

    SAILORS WILL VOUCH THAT CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAS DONE MORE TO PREVENT GLOBAL WARMING THAN ANYBODY ON THIS PLANET..    BALLS TO THE MENTAL MIDGET JEWESS GRETA THUNBERG

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/01/naive-sailor-magnetised-pv-valves-capt.html

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/dec/29/of-course-trump-hates-central-bankers-they-tell-the-truth

    FED IS SHITTING IN ITS ROTHSCHILD DESIGNED KOSHER PANTS

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/01/murky-truths-of-inflation-and.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/10/say-no-to-big-brother-of-george-orwells.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/02/worth-more-than-sum-total-of-entire.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/02/great-american-depression-capt-ajit.html


    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

















    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    HOW TO RELEASE THE TRAPPED AND MISERABLE SOUL FROM PLANET EARTH AFTER DEATH – CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

    $
    0
    0


    a few days ago, i attended a cremation .

    the man died from lung collapse.. he was rushed to hospital and the doctors declared him dead on arrival.

    now there is a new thing in india.. there is an official procedure before you can get the death certificate.

    they forced a postmortem .

    anyways , just before the dead body was created , i noticed a hole on the head with blood oozing and a small bit of brain popping out.

    this meant that the skull’s integrity was gone.

    the skull would not pop during cremation causing a soliton wave , on which carrier wave the soul takes a ride to one of the seven astral layers.

    so after the cremation was over, i asked his elder brother to break a coconut with intention, so that the soul which was trapped on earth could be released.

    breaking of a coconut created a similar soliton wave , as that of the skull popping .
    “ om, release the soul of xxxx “ is the intention before breaking the coconut.

    no other soul trapped on earth can take a piggy back ride .


    if your intact skull does not pop dring cremation your eldest son must break your skull with a heavy rod to generate that soliton wave while being cremated.

    hindus must remember, if any hindu drowned at sea, and his body could not be located , can use the coconut method to release his soul.

    the coconut on kalasha kumbham  , is the topmost spire of every ancient hindu temple..
    the kalasha kumbam as a living visual metaphor ( cornucopia ) goes beyond rational language and expressions.

    it defines purnatatva or fullness and is an eloquent reminder that only from fullness can fullness arise.

    om purnamadah purnamidam purnat purnamudachyate
    purnasya purnamadaya purnamevavashisyate ..  isha upanishad , 5000 bc

    from infinity is born infinity.
    when infinity is taken out of infinity, only infinity is left over.
    om, the brahman is infinite, whole and complete

    the invisible brahman is infinite; the visible universe is also infinite. from infinite brahman, infinite universes come out. the infinite brahman still remains infinite, even though infinite universes come out of it.

    this 7000 year old verse is the most profound verse ever written or will be written by man- it is pregnant with profound truths. it contains the whole secret of the mystic approach towards life.

    ever since burial religions judaism/ christianity/ islam etc were created this planet has not known any peace..  the souls of the dead people who were cremated , are all trapped on planet earth, lonely and miserable forever.

    in hindusim we don’t create the dead bodies of small children of less than 27 months age and that of jivanmukts ( sages ).

    this is because they don’t have an ego.. this means their soul are of the same frequency as that of brahman ( the morphogentic consciousness field ) of the seventh layer.. they are in reality gods on earth.

    the higher your soul frequency –the more conscious you are.

    a jivan mukt whose soul has the highest frequency while living on planet earth has all 7 colour auras ( like ranbow ) the whole aura enclosed in a golden sheath. a person who is a jivan mukt already has his kundalini raised. once your kundalini is raised to the 7th chakra --it means that you are a "moksha soul"

    as you evolve ( soul frequency rises  ) your kundalini rises

    there is no instant kundalini bungee jump from mooladhara to sahasrara chakra -- because laws are karma are attached

    never illtreat a small child less than 27 years of age.. this is bad karma. after the age of 27 months the child starts developing an ego.  his soul frequency new drops and he is subjected to the laws of karma.

    the soul of a liberated sage ( jivanmukt ) , is of highest frequency same as the field of brahman.. his karmic baggage is zero.. he has zero ego.. in hindusim we do not cremate such a human , as his soul has already merged with brahman while on earth .

    a jivan mukt has transcended worldy matters and has attained cosmic consciousness... this is the meaning of liberation..

    he is now a sage , a witness sitting at the bindu and looking outwards ..

    lot of fake gurus have been buried by their followers ..  the souls of such cheats will be trapped on earthforver.

    muslims have this concept of dargah  where they pray to the souls of dead holy men .. ye the soul of that person is hanging around the grave.. praying to that “trapped and miserable” soul is of no use..

    in ancient days jivan mukts were buried “above” the ground in a sitting position inside a dolmen. jivan mukts sage soul is already enmeshed with the brahman field-- it does not require a soliton wave boost of skull popping in fire

     a dargah is not a dolmen.. there is no trapped miserable soul soul hanging around at a dolmen

    in the post below  i have shown some pictures of dolmens

    every living thing on planet earth has a soul within.

     the purpose of man getting moksha and his soul merging with the mother field of brahman ( seventh astral layer ) is for a closed feedback loop .. this is quantum physics.
    a moksha soul is not reborn on planet earth in a female womb. that is the final end of endless rebirths..

    with moksha you soul just merges with the mother field , negative karmic baggage  being shed , and seeds of ego being burnt. this is real homecoming..

    only cremated bodies get moksha.

    moksha can happen only in the holy land of india..

    sanatana dharma says “ you are not your body,you are the soul within”

    remember -- the only difference between your soul ( you ) and brahman ( god ) is the difference in frequency.

    soul is god within.. this is why we do namaste even to our enemies. you body which you see in the mirror like a rented house..

    during creation, this rented house is burnt down, you ( soul ) remains outside .. te soul must now take a trip to an astral layer, be parked there for a while before it is re-inducted back on earth..

    you ( soul ) will soon reside in a new rented house , which you cannot choose .. the quality of this new house and its location will be decided  by brahman ( mother field of soul ) based on your karma while you lived in the last collapsed house..

    once you are born as a conscious human , you cannot go back to lower forms of animal life ..

    conscious creatures like dolphins, elephants, chimps ( who pass the mirror colour test ) are in line for promotion to humans. 

    it is a sort of spiritual evolution.

    idiot darwin did not understand this .

    darwins evolution is not from monkey to man, as the freemasons told him after misunderstanding indian sanskrit texts.

    evolution is up the seven astral layers .

    the human soul is a tiny ball of energy which gives perpetual motion to your heart .
    only the field of brahman an give perpetual motion.

    the human soul is part of brahman the field.. it excites – nay powers the perpetual motions within the human body .. the blood circulation in the heart itself is mobius.
    when the soul exits the body the human aura disappears.    much before you get cancer the human aura shows black holes.

    the human aura is powered by the 7 chakras.

    for animals and human criminals / homosexuals only the root chakra ( muladhara ) exists .. rest of  the outer aura layers are weak or don’t exist.

    this is why after death,   souls of human criminals/ homosexuals (though conscious mammals ) keep company with lower forms on life non-conscious forms on the first astral layer  ..

    "you" are a ball of energy within your cadaver called "soul"

    "soul" gives perpetual motion to your heart . 

    you-  soul of lower frequency due to negative karmic baggage was once part of the mother field of brahman of highest frequency   ..

    it years to merge back --it yearns for moksha ( home coming )

    only brahman ( the field on seventh layer ) can give perpetual motion.
    the human soul after death gets parked in astral layers one to six, for the next induction on earth..

    souls parked in astra layer six, have higher frequency than souls parked in lower layers

    human souls parked in the first astral layer has maximum negative karma and lowest soul frequency

    human souls parked in the sixth layer has least negative karmic baggage and hence higher soul frequency

    atsral layers  two to six have only human souls .. yama is in charge and he decides which layer your soul deserves to be parked...    yama propels the soul when the skull pops during cremation to a suitable astral layer ( two to six ) .

    souls remains individually isolated in layers one to six..  but a soul which reaches astral layer seven merges with the mother field of brahman, the frequencies matching.
    all souls in first to sixth astral layers --await re-birth.

    astral layers one ( lower level ) to six ( higher level ) have ascending frequencies ..
    the lower the negative karmic baggage the higher the soul frequency..

    yama is not ruler of hell.

    yama does not hold the "final judgement" like in christianity. this goes against the laws of karma.

    in sanatana dharmathere is no heaven or hell.

    the higher the astral layer, the higher the soul frequency..

    astral layer one holds criminal/ homosexual conscious human souls and lower species..

    there is no permanent heaven or hell in hindusim. the first astral layer is a semi temporary hell --the pope stole this idea as "purgatory"

    all souls in first to sixth astral layers --await re-birth.

    this is soul evolution

    ganesha is in charge of the mooladhara bandhan ( brahma granthi knot )   stopping kundalini rise.    only he can make a man out of you. 

    no expansion of consciousness is possible without ganesha’s express permission.  ganesha’s karma adhyaksha sets the wheel of karma into motion- he knows every subtle thing of your mind and past deeds.

    ganesha decides if the animal soul should enter a conscious body.

    ganesha is in charge of the first astral layer..   yama is in charge of astral layers two to six..

    ganesha decides if you are worthy of astral layers two to seven

    you soul shoots up to one of the six astral layers depending on soul evolution-- your karmic baggage balance…

    mad man charles darwins mind is too shallow --he can only think of monkey to man evolution--   and that zebras neck became longer because leaves went higher on tree branches,  because the muff ate all them lower leaves ..

    when you get moksha your soul has merged with brahman ( mother field ) and you are now free from endless rebirths

    your soul gives feedback to brahman of your lifes experiences-- brahman knows everything..

    as long as brahman gets positive feedback , the cosmos will thrive..

    the day the feedback becomes stagnant , there will be pralaya ( dissolution ). when creator brahma breathes in there is pralaya – cosmic dissolution..

    breathing in has to be assisted by destroyer shiva ( dark energy ) ..

    mediator vishnu decides what time pralaya must take place..

    moksha is purely karma based. there is no short cut or jugaad possible

    only souls can enter all seven astral layers --not the physical body ..

    when the 5 pandava brothers and draupadi decide to climb mount meru --it is an allegory for death and souls parking at one of the seven astral layers

    yama ( dharma ) in the form of a dog joins this group ..

    yama ushers in --
    draupadi into the second astral layer
    nakula into the third astral layer
    sahadeva into the fourth astral layer
    bhima into the fifth astral layer
    arjuna into the sixth astral layer

    and then yuddhistra looks back and sees the dog.. he knows that no dog can get past the first astral layer --and he is puzzled..

    the dog represented dharma ( yama ) — yudhishtra was “son of dharma “..
    at the seventh astral layer ( equivalent of heaven ) yuddhistra sees all hundred kauravas already there -- along with the stalwarts like bhishma/ drona /karna etc

    he is shocked and angry

    at that time yama ( the doorkeeper of astral layers 2 to 6 ) declares that he is yuddhistras father with kunti .. and that yuddhistra still has seeds of ego within hims which makes him unfit for moksha ..

    yamas explanation: whoever krishna killed --all got moksha .. krishna had the unwritten task of killing all 100 test tube kaurava babies-- he did it and how..

    cremation fire ( agni ) is yamas priest as per vedas .   
    yama propels the soul when the skull pops during cremation to a suitable astral layer .

    yama is also the son of vivasat , the keeper of dharma.. yama is not the lord of hell
    in sanatana dharma there is no hell or heaven.

    for a soul trapped on earth forever- lonely and miserable , this is living hell.. a dargah soul is in hell.

    pandavas would have had albino blood if mother kunti has sex with pandu ( an albino)--  and in that case krishna would have killed all 5 pandavas too..

    after reading the mahabharata epic -- all wondered why krishna played foul—

    if you really look at it dispassionately -- he gave all 100 test tube babies moksha-- the ultimate gift from vishnus avatar

    remember doing puja , visiting temples , doing shraddh for ancestors , dipping in ganges --    is all to put you in a mental framework of "gratitude"

    it is the laws of karma that compels hindus to behave righteously as per the universal moral order or laws of dharma..

    the hindu knows that karma is in his own hands .. this is why a hindu is the same outside doors and within doors.. karma catched up behind closed doors.

    karmic baggage has been accumulated over many births as a human..

    there is no permanent hell in sanatana dharma. you get a chance to redeem yourself.. zindagi zaroor milegi doobara. this "one life only" theory applies only to single holy book, single messiah religions..

    in sanatana dharma we have countless lives.-- till we attain moksha and the soul merges with brahman ( the mother field )

    what is the worth of a religion if it does not allow redemption ?

    true redemption happens when guilt ( judged by own conscience --not by someone at the pearly gates or hour of judgement ) leads to good. sanatana dharma is a noble religion because it believes that no human is beyond redemption.

    in sanatana dharma your soul ( conscience ) guides you --  not some stupid dogma ridden single holy book or single messiah..

    you ( your soul ) is re-inducted back on earth , from any of the bottom 6 astral layers to give you another chance to reduce your karmic baggage .. you are not condemned for one bad life.. this is the charm of sanatana dharma.. it gives man hope.

    the belief in karma and reincarnation brings to each hindu inner peace and self-assurance. the hindu knows that the maturing of the soul takes many lives, and that if the soul is immature in the present birth, then there is hope, for there will be many opportunities for learning and growing in future lives.

    your present life is nothing, when compared with the whole soul-life. it is momentary - a mere fragment.

    vishnu avatars were not born with the stars like you and me . their souls were created and sent down for a purpose on earth.

    after their mission on earth was accomplished  , their souls merged back to brahman on seventh astra layer ( vaikunta ).

    vishnu avatars did not leave any offsprings behind.

    it is impossible for con-men to claim that they are descendants of rama or krishna..

    every living and growing entity on planet earth has a soul.   we were all part of the mother field named brahman on the seventh astral layer

    the god of sanatana dharma is a "morhogeneteic consciousness field- brahman " which cannot he picked up by the 5 senses--on micro and macro scale.

    on micro scale this empty space ( intelligent field ) provides perpetual motion within an atom.

    in hinduism we cremate dead bodies for two reasons .

    no 1 reason is that the soul has to travel on a solition carrier wave created by skull popping , to an astral plane .

    the second reason is earth is not polluted by a cremated body .. the ashes enrich the soil.. only a small pot of selected pure carbon ash is thrown into the flowing water body or sea .

    the immersed in water ashes provide dna memory to the sea or river .

    the buried dead cadaver pollutes the ground water and underwater aquifers , causing prion diseases  .

    the basis of all religions except hinduism is to fill you with guilt -- this heaven and hell concept .

    hinduism does not subscribe to hell .

    hinduism does not subscribe to you being a sinner who has to be saved .

    if your accumulated karma is bad, when you get re-inducted back on earth you will suffer.

    these lying christian psychologists talk about past life regression ( which cannot take off unless you believe in hindus concept of re-incarnation and re-births ) --

    they have lifted everything from our ancient scriptures-

    it takes a capt ajit vadakayil to take down their lying pants .

    in sanatana dharma it is not your current birth which decides your fate-- all the extra baggage of your past lives add up

    after death your soul is parked in one of the bottom six astral layers in hibernation , without kriya shakti.

    only when you are re-inducted back on earth in another body form ( as human ) do you regain your power over karma.

    sanatana dharma urges you to shed your ego and lead a simple life while on earth.

    your ego is your ( souls ) greatest enemy.

    evolution is your ( souls ) evolution up the ladder -- to the 7 layers. not mad man darwins stupid theory..

    yama does not hold the "final judgement" like in christianity. this goes against the laws of karma.

    the opium drug running partners of jew rothschild/ sassoon ( calcutta ) gambled on dhanteras , first day of diwali to please yama.  

    kubera is the opposite direction -guardian of north.

    only conscious "human souls"  are bound by the laws of karma.

    if a white christian man is cremated in the west his soul will shoot up to one of the bottom six astral layers--but not to the seventh --that can happen only in the holy land of india.

    a white man in the west whose soul is evolved and worthy of the seventh layer is born as an indigo child. indigo is same color of the sixth astral layer.

    the human soul evolves -- with difefrent births inside different humans it gets a chance to increases its frequency and wipe out past karmic baggage

     a criminal or homosexual has only one aura ( red in colour --riddled with black holes ).    he has not risen above his mooladhara chakra ( root --survival seat like animals )

    the tendency of gays to impale their assholes ( has a reason behind it )

    again, there is no heaven or hell in hinduism.

    there is no permanent hell in sanatana dharma. you get a chance to redeem yourlself

    ramana maharishi made a great show of giving moksha to his own mother and got her buried.

    sorry ramana baby-- you cannot reduce the karmic baggage of anybody , including your own mother

    in any case , women cannot get moksha, seeds of ego remain.. they have to be reborn as men in india.

    karmic baggage has been accumulated over many births as a human ..

    by burying his mother , ramana maharishi ensured that his mothers soul is trapped on earth, miserable and lonely forever

    ramanas followers say --that he was egoless .

    listen he was silent , his whole life. he hardly spoke any words from birth till death

    lot of fake gurus pretend to be jivan mukhts.. when they die without specifying they want to be cremated--their followers bury them . these gurus have screwed themselves--ideal punishment

    rothschild fooled shiva worshipers veerashaiva lingayaths into burying their dead.

    rothschild fooled pisharodys of kerala ( vishnu worshippers ) to bury their dead
    you cant lessen your karmic baggage by praying endlessly to god...

    karmic baggage can be lessened only by good deeds and being creative --so that you prove that you made a difference to this planet for the better

    pilgrims who go for sabarimala after a strict 41 dat vrat lower their karmic baggage ..this is the only pilgrimage which fords this—not even kumbh mela..

    you are given chances to lessen your karmic baggage once you become human. this is why god has given you free will.

    god does not punish animals with bad karma-- as animals behave on pure survival instincts.  animals have only mooladara chakra..

    once you become human you do not go back to being an animal by baad karma.

    it is obvious all are not born equal— some are brainy and handsome, some are ugly and retarded .

    obviously there is a divine reason for this , right ?

    we do shraddh / immersion of ashes , hoping that the deceased jumps up by one astral layer-- due to love shown by the people he left behind.

    human souls of lowest frequency parked  in lowest first layer  with lower forms of life ( only mooladhara chakra party ) --   cannot get a boost by shraddh.   
    .
    when you are dead and gone , your children must remember you with gratitude.  it is good for them to reduce their own karmic baggage..  this is why we do pitru tarpanam and amavasya shraddh every year.

    yama is not the devil, as what is discussed in literary fests by desh drohi white men .

    yama like rudra is a god in vedas. 

    vedas desribe yama as the regent of the departed.

    yama is lord of pitris – the guardian of the ancestors souls in astral layers two to six.

    yama is lokapala , the regent of the south as per vaastu.

    sanatana dharma urges you to shed your ego and lead a simple life while on earth.

    your ego is your ( souls ) greatest enemy.

    as your soul frequency increaes you shed your ego

    curses and blessings from high frequency souls have effect

    when it comes to reducing negative karmic baggage only you can help yourself .. you forge the hinges of your destiny on your own terms.

    only conscious "human souls" are subjected to the laws of  karma.

    the white invader injected poison that hindus believe in fate ( destiny )

    an intelligent man will note that karma and destiny are at loggerheads.

    conscious man has been granted free will by god

    although bad karmic baggage usually results in suffering it is not a punishment for punishment's sake; nor is it divine retribution. 

    karma is simply an opportunity to make good by change –  it neither punishes nor rewards; it simply guides.

    the law of karma is not the cause of suffering,  it is merely the change agent.

    karma is self-balancing divine justice; it is 100% fair and absolutely infallible.  it doesn't matter if a criminal seems to get away with it

    there is no getting away with it – karma will eventually catch up with him  -if not in this life then the next life

    caste has nothing to do with karma — it is all about human suffering .

    ask kancha iliah if he would be a handsome dalit with a mighty “pathar peh marengga tog tungg bolenga “  prick and a tattu brahmin with a wee oozing prick affected by leprosy…

    we are in control of our destiny but have no control over our fate.     destiny cannot be forced on us; if we are forced then it is our fate.  fate is determined by god who has overriding powers. you were born into your mother’s womb by fate

    every choice we make affects our future and therefore our destiny

    when a soul gets moksha it merges with brahman. it gives back its experience it picked up as within every possible living body--  insect-plant animal - human.

    brahman the mother field wants constant information --as a closed feedback loop

    shearing off parts of his own field body ( after reducing frequency to lowest ) and sending them to earth to experience and the merging back these evolved moksha souls ( of highest frequency ) by a feedback loop is gaining knowledge

    brahman sends down souls to earth ( sheared off parts of his body ) and receives back souls from earth

    remember brahman the field, knows everything -- by way of this closed feedback loop.

    life is the means by which brahman understands himself.    – capt ajit vadakayil

    the ancient maharishi judged your worth by just looking at your aura. he needs no written or oral exams.

    the maharishi can hear cosmic sounds.. he can download vedas from akasha ..

    you cant lessen your karmic baggage by praying to god and displaying bhakti like other single holy book religions.

    a hindu cultivates shraddha --not bhakti

    shraddha belongs to spirituality of sanatana dharma .. bhakti belongs to dogma based single messiah religions..

    shraddha is enlightened faith after self verification which factors in human conscience. blind devotion is not allowed in hinduism..

    jew rothschild cooked up the bhakti movement and all its heroes..including dasas, of which kabir das is a small part..

    the whole idea was to wean away hindus from shraddha and get them entangled in bhakti, like the abrahamic religions..

    jew rothschild went around removing shraddha and inserting bhakti inour vedas/ upanishads and bhagawad gita..

    sanatana dharma is based on spirituality which happens due to shraddha --it is not like any other stupid religion which advocates mindless dogma based bhakti.

    in bhagavad gita, krishna uses the word shraddha more than a dozen times in different places in his conversation with arjuna. in these places, krishna clearly stresses the importance of shraddha in knowing him..

    sprirituality is impossible without shraddha.. shraddha is enlightened faith coming from within, not blind faith being pounded in from outside..

    bhakti movement cooked up by jew rothschild injected kirtan ( in vernacular ) into sanatana dharma..

    chanting sanskrit mantras is not kirtan or bhajan..

    no guru can give you deeksha for moksha

    dont ever think you can do endless puja , visit hundreds of temples, dip in ganges and obtain moksha

    as your karmic baggage becomes less , your soul frequency rises -- your kundalini rises proportionately and your aura layers increase .

    the kundalini rises chakra to chakra only if the soul frequency increases .

    with every rise of the kundalini on the seven chakra steps , the body aura increases by one colored layer, of the seven rainbow colours.

    7 chakras are aligned to seven astral layers

    if your karmic baggage is too high, you will take re-birth to suffer.

    the field of brahman ( god ) , does not treat all the same.

    this is why some are beautiful having brains who are respected , while some are ugly lepers with nil brains who are despised . a certain black elephant kumari must not bitch that she is not beautiful like aishwarya rai.

    again, a man who has raised his kundalini to sahasrara ( crown ) chakra , has 7 clear large vibgyor auras --enveloped in a golden sheath --his karmic baggage is zero,  ego is zero,  his  soul at highest frequency

    the white invader gave bull that calling yourself a brahmachari by abstaining from sex with a woman will give you moksha..

    as a result  filthy and evil homosexuals who engage in anal sex wore saffron robes and called themselves seers in connivance with benami media and foreign funded  ngos .

    in reality their souls have the lowest frequency and can only be stuck in the first astral layer –  to be re-inducted into bad wombs for extreme suffering on planet earth

    one day your pet dog will be a human. respect the soul within the dog. you and your dog came to existence at the same split second along with the stars

    plants and animals get killed or die as part of the grand plan of evolution of soul.     they will be humans in due course of course with samskaras ( soul impressions ).

    understanding the way karma works, the hindu naturally seeks to live a good and virtuous life through right thought, right speech and right action.

    crime is least  in hinduism .

    in sanatana dharma even vishnu avatars were not spared of laws of karma.

    king vali was killed by lord rama.

    in his next avatar krishna was killed by vali as a hunter named jara.  being a god krishna knew it was coming and accepted it.

    in hindusim we cant kill and then pray 5 times a day with you ass upwards —to wash the sin away

    at sea we do not become captain of ship just like that

    we go through all lower jobs on ship including cleaning toilets, painting etc

    as a captain you have experienced everything. nobody can pull the wool over your eyes.

    experience is the best teacher. the tiny soul gets stretched by god experience and increases its frequency..

    once the frequency is same as the mother field on the seventh astral layer , it merges back , giving back to the field, its richness of experience

    brahman ( field / god ) knows everything

     soul has to evolve by self education , by experience .
    sanatana dharma urges you to shed your ego and lead a simple life while on earth.

    your ego is your ( souls ) greatest enemy.

    evolution is your ( souls ) evolution up the ladder -- to the 7 layers.

    the weight of karmic baggage is simply what we do in a conscious manner . if you do something wrong inadvertently it does not count as karma..  

    this is why small children without ego ( less than 27 months age ) are not cremated .. they are buried.. 

    their souls go back to the same astral layer they came from.. their karmic baggage is unchanged as their ego has not caused them to do deliberate mistakes.

    your karmic baggage is with you in your next life too. suicide will not eliminate the karmic baggage –rather the weight of karmic baggage increases as your soul gets inducted to another  human form in your next rebirth..

    a human being is not a totally different entity than its experiences in its previous lives.  you are the old soul within your current mortal coil.  the soul is indestructible.

    it is the essence of karma to bring forth the actions of the past to the present
    in each incarnation we suffer the consequences of some of our previous bad karma –and every human soul has a  resultant karmic baggage plus some picked up samskaras , which affect current life on the planet , like phobias , deep rooted vices etc .

    as per quantum physics we humans are cogs of the universe.

    as per stupid newton we humans are insignificant specks of matter  .

    the awareness of vice and virtue is inherent in the soul. 

    gratitude is inherent and woven into hinduism, which makes this religion noble. hinduism does not allow you to breach a trust.

    so if a hindu goes to sabarimala after a rigorous 41 day vrat, -- his whole idea is to get inspired to lessen his karmic baggage.

    sabarimala pilgrimage works like a miracle--drunken wife beaters and total nalayaks come back reformed --all know this

    taking a dip in pampa river is compulsory --or sabarimala pilgrimage does not work.. water holds memory

    pampa holy water can measure the increase or decrease of karmic baggage between two dips over different years .

    there is a conspiracy to kill the sabamimala pilgrimage by making the pampa river go dry..

    a guruswamy has been measured 18 times..

    remember doing puja , visiting temples ,  doing shraddh for ancestors , dipping in ganges --is all to put you in a mental framework of "gratitude"

    when you are " grateful " your body becomes a wonderful machine

    when you do reiki --you have to be in a feeling of gratitude to the supreme force --if you are unable to do that, because you are a cunt, even being grateful to your mother or pet cat works

    both brain lobes have to be synchronized by spirit level ( inner ear cochlea ) sitting posture--with legs in a mobius coil circuit. immediately your body emanates scalar waves faster than light

    hindus must know that our puranas are cosmic alegories personalised.. of course there are stories of vishnus mortal avatars ..

    all hindu gods are cosmic allegories except mortal avatrs of vishnu raa/ krishna/ ayyappa

    karma operates as a self-sustaining mechanism as natural universal law, without any need of an external entity to manage them.

    in sanatana dharma only accumulated karmic baggage decides moksha

    before moksha, the soul must go through all the experiences of life in the physical world from bacteria to plant insect to bird to animal to conscious man to jivanmukt.

    if all world religions combined is a drop of stinking dirty water —  sanatana dharma is the deep pristine blue ocean.

    all ancient maharishis were jivanmukts..

    only jivanmukhts can download vedic srutis from akasha.. it is not possible for any other human to do that.

    women cannot be jivanmukts.

    the white nvader lied that some women wrote the vedas.

    listen-

    when men have not written vedas—how can women write it ?

    veda srutis have no mortal authors.  they are downloaded from akasha by maharishis.

    all these fake female maharishis like gargi, lopamudra , ghose etc are all cooked up and injected into our ancient vedas and puranas

    karma is not religion or even spirituality..this is about consciousness and advanced quantum physics. there is no dogma or superstition here..

    the universe is woven from consciousness .. it knows what goes on in your mind..

    idiots like parsi priest cum judge nariman , must not talk about karma ( butterfly effect ) , which is advanced quantum physics.. a human action creates an invisible quantum motion of force at the subatomic level.

    karma is "intention based " not action based.. if you do a bad deed with good intention, you dont get bad karma-- and vice versa. .

    you can hide your intentions from others but not from yourself or the universe. you are a small cog within many other cogs. when you move, you move all the other cogs.

    karma is that catalyst that connects actions and thoughts with the quantum ripples of energy that in essence creates this dynamism in life here and hereafter.

    this is why intention ( when breaking a coconut ) is such a powerful thing. it moves the cosmos.

    karma is a universal law; it cannot be broken.

    the doctrine of karma teaches: "do not blame anybody when you suffer. do not accuse god. blame yourself first. you will have to reap what you have sown in your previous birth.

    an individual’s karma is based on their thoughts, words, and intentional actions and the choices they make.

    we hindus were the first to pray on this planet.. we were the first to understand the meaning of intention and concsiousness

    karma is not punishment or retribution but simply an expression or consequence of natural acts.

    karma is like a seed, most of the times karma does not fructify immediately after the seed is sown.

    “law of karma” is like a universal law say “law of gravity” -   it applies whether you accept or reject the law. whether you are muslim of jew or christian.

    karma means you create your own life. karma is an unbreakable law of the cosmos. you deserve everything that happens to you, good or bad. you created your happiness and your misery.,

    the whole universe is observing you..

    karma treats everyone equally. you won’t get special treatment.

    karma plants a seed. over time it will grow. at just the right moment, the exact moment, you will receive your karma. karma makes you experience what you have done to others.

    the doctrine of karma only can bring solace, contentment, peace and strength to the afflicted and the desperate. it solves our difficulties and problems of life.

    it gives encouragement to the hopeless and the forlorn. it pushes a man to right thinking, right speech and right action

    the most important part of your life will be the unseen random acts of kindness you performed.

    the thing with karma is that it doesn’t always happen immediately. sometimes we have to wait for years. sometimes our karma arrives without us even knowing it, or knowing what form it has taken.

    remember the purpose of karma is not revenge. the universe is not vengeful. the purpose of karma is to help you become a better person..

    there can be no moksha even if you have an iota of ego within you.

    as ego reduces , karmic baggage lightens, and your soul frequency increases..
    karma is simply an opportunity to make good – it neither punishes nor rewards; it simply guides.

    again, laws of karma give hope..this is quantum physics, you are at nobody’s mercy.
    the aim of every religion is to give hope.. 

    but the single messsiah / single holy book religions put you under servility. the mullahs and popes want to save you--because they have a hot line with god

    in sanatana dharma there is no middle man between you and god..

    the purport of the term karma is to make individuals take ownership for their conscious actions

    the doctrine of karma brings hope to the hopeless, help to the helpless, joy to the cheerless and new strength to the weak. it braces up a sunken man. it is an ideal "pick-me-up" for the depressed and gloomy.

    the doctrine of karma teaches: "do not blame anybody when you suffer. do not accuse god. blame yourself first. you will have to reap what you have sown in your previous birth.

    your present sufferings are due to your own bad karma in your past life. you are yourself the author of the present state.

    guilt is a form of punishment. guilt deprives man of rem sleep. painful results in your life come from actions you took that clashed with the laws of the universe. the pain drives home the lesson.

    karma is the physical manifestation of the law of balance and harmony, as it applies to the results of decisions reached and attitudes held by beings capable of free will and choice

    your intentional actions create your future. what you are experiencing right now is what karma wants you to experience

    you can’t escape from your past, but learning from it will change your future.

    karma is real. karma is your bond with the past. karma teaches you and makes your knowledge of the world more complete.

    your present sufferings are due to your own bad karma in your past life. you are yourself the author of the present state.

    a jivanmukt can access akashik records .. every ancient maharishi was a jivan mukt.. they downloaded the veda srutis from akasha ..

    the jivanmukht does not need to think .. his brain does sphota— which is consciousness minus thinking

    vedas which went on oral route by 330 centuries ( kerala namboodiris ) was penned down 70 centuries ago , again by kerala namboodiris in the grantha script..

    that is why parashurama gave the 4 vedas and 108 upanishads to kerala namboodiris and brought them safely from saraswati river banks to tirunavaya 6000 years ago-- after sarswati river dried up..

    this does not mean sanskrit texts were written down only 7000 years ago..

    written veda srutis are no use at all.. this is not like some english poetry or some vernacular bhajan..

    the power of a sanskrit veda sruti or mantra lies in the sound..

    most of the times the meaning is just to induce a sense of gratitude which is a powerful energy . the mobius coils within the body get activated..

    when a sanskrit veda sruti is read from the book and uttered the wrong way, the kerala namboodiri who hears it-- can hear it wrong / see it wrong / feel it wrong
    divine math is embedded in the veda sruti verse ..

    vedic srutis have golden mean (1.618 ) , fibonacci series , pascals triangle, lucas numbers , sri yantra ( geometry of om ), ulam spiral, prime number verifier , isotope magic embedded in it ..

    danava civilization stalwart kerala namboodiri bhartrhari ( 7000 bc ) wrote his sphota theory in sanskrit..

    kerala namboodiri manu ( 8300 bc ) wrote the first laws for the planet in sanskrit. every company today has a blue book or code "manual" .. manual is derived from manu..

    there are many manus in our history.. the first manu was a cosmic allegory..
    human consciousness is why we are able to see ourselves in the mirror and see colour.. unlike lower species like animals and birds. only humans can do swadhaya or contemplation.. we can take subjective decisions approved by our conscience .

    sanatana dharma is advanced quantum physics..it can never be explained by classical physics..












    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    HAPPY NEW YEAR 2020-- CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL


    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0



    I WILL GIVE ENOUGH TIME FOR MY READERS TO PERUSE "DAS KAPITAL" ..



    1. TODAY--

      ENGELS AND LENIN ARE KICKED INTO VADAKAYILs GARBAGE BUCKET, TO KEEP COMPANY WITH MARX


      GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:

      1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
      2 NOAM CHOMSKY
      3 SIGMUND FREUD
      4) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
      5) AMARTYA SEN
      6) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
      7) IMMANUEL KANT
      8 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
      9) ALBERT EINSTEIN
      10) ISAAC NEWTON
      11) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
      12) CHARLES DARWIN
      13) KARL MARX
      14) MAX WEBER
      15) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
      16) FIBONACCI
      17) EDWARD BERNAYS
      18) JOHN DEWEY
      19) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
      20 PETER D OUPENSKY
      21) OPRAH WINFREY
      22) RICHARD BANDLER AND JOHN GRINDER
      23) CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
      24) STEPHEN HAWKING
      25) SIDNEY HOOK
      26) ALFRED KINSEY
      27) BARACK OBAMA
      28) AYN RAND
      29) WILHELM WUNDT
      30) RENE DESCARTES.
      31) EMPRESS HELENA
      32) RAYMOND IV
      33) SAINT MOTHER TERESA
      34) LENIN
      35) ENGELS

      ########################

      BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “

      1) NIKOLA TESLA
      2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
      3) IE IRODOV
      4) ARYABHATTA ( 2700 BC)
      5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
      6) CHANAKYA ( 372 BC )
      7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA ( 2000 BC )
      8) APOLLONIUS OF TYANA ( KERALA SAGE WHOSE LEGACY WAS USURPED BY COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )
      9) "JOHN DOE"
      10) JULIAN ASSANGE
      11) SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA
      12) GARY STEPHEN WEBB
      13) GEORGE ORWELL.
      13) CESAR MILLAN
      14) HENRY FORD.
      15) PANINI ( 5500 BC )
      16) BHARTRHARI ( 7000 BC )
      17) PATANJALI ( 5000 BC )
      18) MANU (8300 BC)
      19) YASKA ( 5800 BC )
      20) JOHN CARMAC
      21) QUEEN DIDO ( 1600 BC )
      22) KANADA MUNI ( 6500 BC )
      23) VARAHAMIHIRA ( 2660 BC )
      24) VARARUCHI ( 2830 BC )
      25) VIROCHANA ( 10, 650 BC )
      26) MAHABALI ( 10,600 BC )
      27) KALANAMI ( 10500 BC )
      28) IMHOTEP / AYYAPPA ( 3900 BC )
      29) PROF HYPATIA
      30) SWARBANU
      31) PUTIN
      32) EDWARD SNOWDEN


      CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----

      1) SUHEL SETH
      2) PRITISH NANDI
      3) DILIP CHERIAN
      4) PRANNOY JAMES ROY
      5) AROON PURIE
      6) VINEET JAIN
      7) SHEKHAR GUPTA
      8) SAGARIKA GHOSE AND HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI
      9) SHOBHAA DE
      10) SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN AND WIFE NANDINI SUNDAR
      11) KAMALHAASAN
      12) AUDREY TRUSCHKE
      13) NOSTRODAMUS
      14) MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
      15) VERGHESE KURIEN
      16) MS SWAMINATHAN
      17) DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
      18) SANJAY R HEGDE
      19) MARK ZUCKERBERG
      20) JACK DORSEY
      21) THOMAS L FRIEDMAN
      22) ROMILA THAPAR
      23) IRFAN HABIB
      24) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
      25) SHELDON POLLOCK
      26) WENDY DONIGER
      27) BARKHA DUTT
      28) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
      29) SWARA BHASKAR
      30) KARAN THAPAR
      31) ADAM D ANGELO
      32) SAINT CRYIL ARCHBISHOP OF ALEXANDRIA
      33) N RAM
      34) GRETA THUNBERG
      35) MK GANDHI
      36) SONIA GANDHI
      37) TED KACZYNSKI



    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil   January 1, 2020 at 9:39 PM

    MY NEXT POST WILL BE ON GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHLD CREATED COMMUNISM.

    GERMAN JEW KARL MARK WAS A BLOOD RELATIVE OF ROTHSCHILD..

    MARX PLAGIARIZED FROM THE WORKS OF PIERRE-JOSEPH PROUDHON..

    MARXs DAS CAPITAL IS WORSE THAN TED KACZYNDKIs MANIFESTO..

    IF TED BABYs MANIFESTO IS A PIECE OF SHIT,  MARXs DAS KAPITAL IS A TRUCKLOAD OF SHIT.. MEANT TO CONFUSE AND BEFUDDLE..

    NO CUNT CAN DAZZLE VADAKAYIL WITH HIS BULLSHIT..

    IF ANYBODY ELSE ON THE PLANET CAN WRITE A BETTER CRITIQUE ON COMMUNISM , PAST / PRESENT / FUTURE,  I WILL STOP BLOGGING AND EAT MY OWN HEAD..

    MEANWHILE TRY SPEED READING THROUGH THE HIMALAYAN CRAP BELOW--






    IT WAS NOT EASY TO DISCARD MARX INTO VADAKAILs GARBAGE BUCKET--   I HAD TO SUFFER MENTAL AGONY..   INTENSE SPEED READING WHICH BLED MY MIND..


    capt ajit vadakayil

    ..




    TO UNDERSTAND COMMUNISM , WATCH THE VIDEO "ANIMAL FARM "BELOW-

    READ THE PROSE FIRST AND THEN WATCH THE MOVIE BELOW..   HISTORY ALWAYS REPEATS ITSELF..

    http://www.huzheng.org/geniusreligion/AnimalFarm.pdf

    GEORGE ORWELL WHO WROTE "ANIMAL FARM" WAS BORN IN MOTIHARI, BIHAR INDIA..   HIS FATHER MANAGED ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM FACTORY IN INDIA

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/animal-farm-by-george-orwell-new.html


    IN THE STORY "ANIMAL FARM",  PIG NAMED NAPOLEON , AS THE BENEVOLENT ALTRUISTIC SELF ELECTED UNION LEADER , MADE ALL THE ANIMALS IN THE FARM UNITE AND AGITATE FOR BETTER LIVING CONDITIONS ( WHEN LIVING CONDITIONS COULD NOT BE BETTER ) .. 

    AND THEN HE TOOK OVER AS THE ULTIMATE TYRANT -- THE CRUEL SADISTIC COMMUNIST DICTATOR.    THIS IS THE REAL NAKED STORY OF COMMUNISM 






    ONE OF THE FIVE OPIUM GODOWNS IS STILL STANDING -- MANAGED BY GEORGE ORWELLs FATHER 





    Below:   Opium factory Hardiya Kothi,  also called Nilha Kothis, in Raxaul village, Bettiah, West Champaran)


    OPIUM GODOWNS


    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/how-gandhi-converted-opium-to-indigo-in.html


    BEFORE YOU TRY TO READ GERMAN JEW KARL MARXs COMMIE ECONOMICS OF DAS KAPITAL, FIRST UNDERSTAND GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILDs BULLSHIT MODERN ECONOMICS.

    READ QUESTIONS TO QUORA 686 TO 820.

















    1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/describing-faizs-poem-as-anti-hindu-absurd-and-funny-javed-akhtar/articleshow/73077084.cms

      ROTHSCHILDs COMMIE AGENT FAIZ AHMAD FAIZ WAS A JEW .. ROTHSCHILD GAVE HIM THE LENIN PEACE PRIZE..

      JUSTICE KATJU HAD BEEN QUOTING FAIZ ( STUPID VERSES ) IN HIS JUDGEMENTS..

      FATHER OF JEW FAIZ AHMAD KHAN, JEW SULTAN MUHAMMAD KHAN WAS USED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD AS A LAWYER FOR MUSLIM AFFAIRS..

      ROTHSCHILD AGENT AND FOUNDER OF INDIAN COMMUNISM MN ROY WITH A JEWESS HONEYPOT WIFE EVELYN TRENT MENTORED FAIZ AHMAD FAIZ IN MARXISM..

      WIFE OF FAIZ AHMAD FAIZ WAS A WHITE JEWESS HONEYPOT NAMED ALYS.. SHE WAS A COMMIE.

      FAIZ AHMAD FAIZ WAS INFLUENCED BY JEW SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN AND JEW POET IQBAL. BOTH WERE ROTHSCHILDs AGENTS..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/12/sir-muhammed-iqbal-knighted-for.html

      THE NIKAHNAMA (MARRIAGE DEED) BETWEEN ALYS GEORGE AND FAIZ BABY WAS SOLEMNIZED BY SHEIKH ABDULLAH ( WHO LOOKED LIKE NEHRU'S TWIN BROTHER IN HIS TEENS ) IN SRINAGAR IN 1941.

      JEW MOHAMED ALI JAUHAR BECAME JAMIA'S FIRST VICE CHANCELLOR, AFTER JEW IQBAL DECLINED.

      ROTHSCHILD GOT JEW MOHAMMED ALI JAUHAR TO FORM ALL INDIA MUSLIM LEAGUE IN DHAKA IN 1906. HE WAS ITS PRESIDENT IN 1918.

      ROTHSCHILD GOT HIS AGENT JEW MOHAMAMD ALI JAUHAR ELECTED AS PRESIDENT OF INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS IN 1923..

      ROTHSCHILD USED HIS AGENT JEW KHWAJA ABDUL HAMIED TO FOUND JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA IN 1920--ALONG WITH JEW MOHAMMAD ALI JAUHAR.

      GERMAN JEW ROTHCHILD SPONSORED JEW KA HAMED’S EDUCATION AT HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY OF BERLIN IN GERMANY.

      ROTHSCHILD USED CIPLA MEDICAINES ON INDIAN HUMANS FOR TESTING INSTEAD OF LAB RATS OR GUINEA PIGS.

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/istanbul-deep-seat-of-jewish-deep-state.html

      JEW KHWAJA ABDUL HAMIED AND HIS LITHUANIAN JEWESS WIFE LUBLA DERCZANSKA WERE MARRIED AI THE CHORAL SYNAGOGUE IN WILNO

      JEWESS LUBLA WAS A HARDCORE COMMUNIST.. SHE WAS A HONEY TRAP

      CIPLA, INDIA'S OLDEST PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY IN 1935 WAS OWNED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD

      CIPLA IS WORTH 1.7 BILLION USD TODAY.. HIS SON JEW YUSUF HAMIED ( MOTHER LITHUANIAN JEWESS LUBA DERCZANSKA) WAS CHAIRMAN OF CIPLA ..

      YUSUF IS THE ARABIC FORM OF THE HEBREW NAME JOSEPH.

      JEW YUSUF BABY COMMISSIONED STATUES OF KATHIAWARI JAIN JEW GANDHI AND HIS BED ROOM MATE ( AFTER GANDHI KICKED OUT WIFE KASTURBA ) JEW HERMANN KALLENBACH WHO CARRIED ENEMA KITS AND JARS OF VASELINE -- IN VILNIUS.

      YUSUF PAID FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SYNAGOGUE

      ZAKIR HUSSAIN BELONGS TO THE JEW AFRIDI TRIBE WHO WAS EMPLOYED BY ROTHSCHILD TO CONTROL KHYBER PASS.

      EX-PRESIDENT ZAKIR HUSSAIN IS BURIED INSIDE THE JAMIA UNIVERSITY CAMPUS..

      JEWESS LUBLA BABY AND JEW KA HAMEID BABY WITH ZAKIR HUSSIAN WHO HAS BEEN SEEN PRAYING AT THE JEWISH SYNAGOGUE IN KHAN MARKET DELHI ..

      SALMAN KHURSHID ( WHO SHOWS THAT HE IS A HARDCORE CONGRESSMAN MUSLIM ) IS ZAKIR HUSSAIN’S GRANDSON..

      JEW KHWAJA ABDUL HAMEID IN BERLIN--WHO FOUNDED THE JAMIA MILIA ISLAMIA IN ALIGARH ALONG WITH ZAKIR HUSSAIN OF THE JAMIA MILIA ISLAMIA ..

      JEW MUKHTAR AHMED ANSARI WAS ALSO ONE OF THE FOUNDERS AND VC OF JAMIA MILIA UNIVERSITY.

      CRYPTO JEW AIR SYED AHMAD KHAN , CRYPTO JEW MOHAMMAD ALI JINNAH, CRYPTO JEW ALLAMA IQBAL ( POET ) AND CRYPTO JEW MOHAMMAD ALI JAUHAR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WEDGING AWAY PAKISTAN. . .

      AMU WAS FOUNDED IN 1975 BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO CREATE A BREED OF CRYPTO JEW INTELLECTUALS WHO WOULD LEAD INDIAN MUSLIMS..

      THIS WAS IN CONSONANCE WITH HIS SLOGAN " IF YOU WANT TO CONTROL THE OPPOSITION, LEAD THEM YOURSELF ".

      ALL INITIAL PATRONS OF AMU WERE CRYPTO JEWS .. INCLUDING PATRON FOUNDER SIR SYED AHMAN KHAN WHO WAS AN AGENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD..

      JEW ROTHSCHILD USED SIR AHMAD KHAN TO CREATE THE FIRST MADRASSAS, TO SOW THE SEEDS OF HATRED TO HINDUS AT A YOUNG AGE...

      EVEN TODAY MADRASSAS IN INDIA/ PAKISTAN/ BANGLADESH GET JEWISH WAHABI/ SALAFI FUNDS FROM CRYPTO JEW AL SAUD ROYAL DYNASTY INSTALLED BY ROTHSCHILD…

      CONTINUED TO 2--
      1. CONTINUED FROM 1---

        ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY WAS CREATED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD AS MADRASATUL ULOOM MUSALMANAN-E-HIND IN 1875 WITH A VIEW TO DRIVE A WEDGE BETWEEN HINDUS AND MUSLIMS . . .

        ROTHSCHILD USED HIS JEW AGENTS HIS HIGHNESS SIR MOHAMMAD ALI MOHAMMAD KHAN AND AGHA KHAN III AS FRONTS FOR FUND COLLECTION AND TO DO PROPAGANDA FOR AMU.

        ROTHSCHILD MADE CRYPTO JEW SIR MOHAMMAD ALI MOHAMMAD KHAN THE PRESIDENT OF ALL INDIA MUSLIM LEAGUE CONFERENCES FOR MORE THAN A DECADE.. HE WAS THE FIRST VC OF AMU..

        JEW SIR AGA KHAN WAS MADE THE PRO-CHANCELLOR OR AMU.

        THIS DROHI SIR AHMAD KHAN SIDED WITH JEW ROTHSCHILD DURING THE 1857 FIRST WAR OF INDEPENDENCE , THOUGH ALL MUSLIMS WERE AGAINST ROTHSCHILD. . .

        CRYPTO JEW SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN OPENLY WROTE THAT MUSLIMS MUST LOYALLY SERVE THE BRITISH EMPIRE, WHICH SHOCKED ALL MUSLIMS IN INDIA. . .

        JEW ROTHSCHILD USED THIS MAN SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN AS A COLLEGIUM JUDGE AND DURING THE INDIAN REBELLION OF 1857, HE WAS 100% LOYAL TO THE WHITE INVADER. … SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN HUNG ALL DESH BHAKT INDIANS-INCLUDING HUNDREDS OF MUSLIMS ..…

        SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN WAS NOMINATED TO THE VICEROY'S LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BY ROTHSCHILD…

        AMU WAS STARTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD IN 1875 USING HIS AGENT AND BUSINESS PARTNER ( GHAZIPUR OPIUM ) CRYPTO JEW SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN..

        . ROTHSCHILDs CARETAKER OF OPIUM FACTORY IN GHAZIPUR WAS SIR SYED AHMAD KHANs FATHER CRYPTO JEW MIR SAYYID MUHAMMAD MUTTAQI, WHO WAS IN THE INNER COURT OF EMPEROR AKBAR SHAH II ( THE PENILTIMATE MUGHAL EMPEROR ) AS HIS PERSONAL ADVISOR . ..

        ROTHSCHILD DID PROPAGANDA THAT HE IS A SAYYID AND CREATED A FAKE LINEAGE ( 36th ) TO MOHAMMAD THE PROPHET..

        SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN IS BURIED INSIDE ALIGARH UNIVERSITY CAMPUS—A ROTHSCHILD FIAT !... ALIGARH UNIVERSITY WAS USED LIKE JNU..

        THE FIRST TWO PRIME MINISTERS OF PAKISTAN, LIAQUAT ALI KHAN AND KHAWAJA NAZIMUDDIN WERE BOTH CRYPTO JEWS FROM AMU .

        JEW JINNAH LIVED ON PIG SANDWICHES AND NEAT WHISKY DURING THE LAST DECADE OF HIS LIFE …

        SHEIKH ABDULLAH WOULD MARRY THE DAUGHTER OF FRENCH JEW MICHAEL HARRY NEDOU --AN AGENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.. THIS JEWESS WAS FIRST MARRIED TO JEW LAWRENCE OF ARABIA ..

        PAKISTANIS CALL JEW SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN PAAJI AS ONE OF THEIR FOUNDING FATHERS. . . AND OF COURSE JEW IQBAL IS THEIR NATIONAL POET..

        WE WANT OUR NCERT BOOKS TO WRITE TRUE HISTORY—NOT ROTHSCHILDs HISTORY..

        Capt ajit vadakayil
        ..

      2. PUT SCREENSHOTS OF THE COMMENT ABOVE IN WEBSITES OF--
        PM OF UK
        AMBASSADOR TO FROM UK
        IMRAN KHAN ( PAKISTANI PM)
        EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER/ MINISTRY INDIA
        INDIAN AMBASSADOR TO PAKISTAN
        VC OF AMU
        VC OF JAMIA
        VC OF JNU/ JU/ DU/ TISS/ FTII
        JAVED AKTHAR
        SHABANA AZMI
        KUNHALIKKUTTY
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        FAZAL GHAFOOR ( MES )
        RANA AYYUB
        SHEHLA RASHID
        AHMAD PATEL
        PMO
        PM MODI
        NITI AYOG
        AMITABH KANT
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
        DGPs OF ALL STATES
        GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
        PRESIDENT OF INDIA
        VP OF INDIA
        SPEAKER LOK SABHA
        SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
        CJI BOBDE
        ATTORNEY GENERAL
        ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
        ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
        LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
        ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
        AJIT DOVAL
        RAW
        IB
        NIA
        ED
        CBI
        AMIT SHAH
        HOME MINISTRY
        DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
        I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        DAVID FRAWLEY
        STEPHEN KNAPP
        WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
        KONRAED ELST
        FRANCOIS GAUTIER
        RSS
        AVBP
        VHP
        MOHAN BHAGWAT
        RAM MADHAV
        THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
        CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
        QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
        QUORA MODERATION TEAM
        KURT OF QUORA
        GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
        SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
        SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
        MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
        BABA RAMDEV
        CHETAN BHAGAT
        AMISH TRIPATHI
        DEVADUTT PATTANAIK
        ENTIRE BBC GANG
        NALIN KOHLI
        GVL NARASIMHA RAO
        SAMBIT PATRA
        VIVEK OBEROI
        GAUTAM GAMBHIR
        ASHOK PANDIT
        ANUPAM KHER
        KANGANA RANAUT
        VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
        KIRON KHER
        MEENAKSHI LEKHI
        SMRITI IRANI
        PRASOON JOSHI
        MADHUR BHANDARKAR
        SWAPAN DASGUPTA
        SONAL MANSINGH
        MADHU KISHWAR
        SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
        GEN GD BAKSHI
        RSN SINGH
        E SREEDHARAN
        MOHANLAL
        SURESH GOPI
        CHANDAN MITRA
        PAVAN VARMA
        RAMACHANDRA GUHA
        MUKESH AMBANI
        RATA TATA
        ANAND MAHINDRA
        KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
        LAXMI NARAYAN MITTAL
        AZIM PREMJI
        KAANIYA MURTHY
        RAHUL BAJAJ
        RAJAN RAHEJA
        NAVEEN JINDAL
        GOPICHAND HINDUJA
        DILIP SHANGHVI
        GAUTAM ADANI
        THE QUINT
        THE SCROLL
        THE WIRE
        THE PRINT
        MK VENU
        MADHU TREHAN
        RAJDEEP SARDESAI
        PAAGALIKA GHOSE
        NAVIKA KUMAR
        ANAND NARASIMHAN
        SRINIVASAN JAIN
        SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
        VIKRAM CHANDRA
        NIDHI RAZDAN
        FAYE DSOUZA
        ZAKKA JACOB
        RAVISH KUMAR
        PRANNOY JAMES ROY
        AROON PURIE
        VINEET JAIN
        RAGHAV BAHL
        SEEMA CHISTI
        DILEEP PADGOANKAR
        VIR SANGHVI
        KARAN THAPAR
        PRITISH NANDI
        SHEKHAR GUPTA
        SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
        SONIA GANDHI
        RAHUL GANDHI
        PRIYANKA GANDHI
        AK ANTONY
        OOMMEN CHANDY
        PC GEORGE
        FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
        ANNA VETTICKAD
        FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA THOMAS ISAAC
        JOHN ABRAHAM
        NASIRUDDIN SHAH
        KUNHALIKUTTY
        MAMOOTTY
        DULQUER SALMAN
        ADMIRAL RAMDAS
        KAVITA RAMDAS
        LALITA RAMDAS
        JOHN DAYAL
        KANCHA ILAIH
        TEESTA SETALVAD
        JEAN DREZE
        ARUDHATI ROY
        SHOBHAA DE
        IRFAN HABIB
        NIVEDITA MENON
        AYESHA KIDWAI
        SWARA BHASKAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        KAVITA KRISHNAN
        PRAKASH KARAT
        BRINDA KARAT
        SITARAM YECHURY
        D RAJA
        ANNIE RAJA
        SUMEET CHOPRA
        DINESH VARSHNEY
        PINARAYI VIYAYAN
        KODIYERI BALAKRISHNAN
        DEANS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ TISS/ FTII
        K SUBBHARAYAN
        BINOY VISWAM
        TK RANGARAJAN
        JOHN BRITTAS
        KAMALAHASSAN
        ALL MPs OF INDIA
        ALL MLAs OF INDIA
        ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN

        SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA


    COMMENTS MADE IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED..

    MAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW—

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/theodore-kaczynski-unabomber-is-also_29.html




    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 2 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0


    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 1, BELOW--





    ALL DESH BHAKT READERS WHO LOVE THEIR WATAN, LISTEN UP.

    RING UP THIS NUBBER ( MISSED CALL ) AND EXPRESS YOUR SUPPORT FOR CAA

    88662 88662

    IN INDIA 95% OF THE LEGITIMATE POPULATION IS FOR CAA..

    WE WILL NOT ALLOW CRIMINAL DNA ROHINGYAS AND ILLEGAL BANGLADESI MUSLIM REFUGEES IN INDIA .. TO SWELL THE VOTE BANKS OF DESH DROHI POLITICIANS WHO ARE IN THE PAYROLL OF PAKISTANI ISI AND DEEP STATE ( TO WEAKEN THE WATAN ) .
    .
    Capt ajit vadakayil
    ..





    1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED

      CAPTAIN

      WOW WOW WOW

      YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS PLANET WITH PERCEPTION..

      YOU HAVE MADE THE GREATEST REVELATION ON THIS PLANET IN THIS LAST CENTURY AND YOU DONT EVEN CALL IT ONE AMONG YOUR 10,000 REVELATIONS..

      HE CRIED.. CAPTAIN YOU ARE THE FIRST TO REVEAL THE TRUE INTENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD TO CREATE WW1 AND WW2 WHERE THE WHOLE PLANET WAS IN FLAMES..

      YOU MENTIONED THIS IN THE POST BELOW--


      ###########################

      ROTHSCHILD KILLED TWO BIRDS WITH THE SAME STONE.. BY WW1 AND WW2 , WHICH ROTHSCHILD CREATED , SUSTAINED AND SNUFFED OUT ON HIS OWN TIME TABLE

      JEW ROTHSCHILD CARVED OUT THE STATE OF ISRAEL AND MADE THE WEARY AND STARVING PLANET READY TO ACCEPT MARXISM, SO THAT HE CAN STEAL.

      COMMUNISM THEORY ONLY ATTRACTS WHEN YOU ARE POOR AND HUNGRY.

      #################################

      INDEED JEW ROTHSCHILD CONVERTED NATIONS TO COMMUNISM AND HE GRABBED THE RULER'S WEALTH AND ALSO SIPHONED OFF THE PEOPLEs WEALTH..

      IN COMMIE NATIONS LIKE RUSSIA, A MAN COULD NOT EVEN OWN HIS OWN PILLOW.. IF HE TRIED TO HIDE SOME PERSONAL GOLD JEWELRY, IT WOULD BE IMPRISONMENT FOR TEN YEARS IN THE SIBERIAN GULAG..

      IN THE SOVIET COMMUNIST RULE ERA , I HAVE BEEN TO MY RUSSIAN / EAST EUROPEANS FRIENDS HOMES AND POINTED OUT TO EACH AND EVERY ITEM AND ASKED HIM/ HER " WHO OWN THIS?"

      THE ANSWER WAS THE SAME -- THE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT

      I KNOW

      capt ajit vadakayl
      ..

    BELOW:  THE "BALFOUR DECLARATION" WAS A FORGED AND BACKDATED LETTER WRITTEN FROM GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD TO HIMSELF...

    USING THAT BULLSHIT LETTER , ROTHSCHILD CARVED OUT ISRAEL..

    NOT A SINGLE ISRAELI JEW ( WHITE MAN WITH THIN UPPER LIP ) LOOKS LIKE THE DENIZENS OF THE NEIGHBORING NATIONS AROUND ISRAEL..

    GOD DID NOT MAKE UPPER LIP RAZOR THIN IN HOT DESERT NATIONS..

    THE WHITE SKINNED JEW CLAIMING PALESTINE BECAUSE HE IS A CONVERTED JEW, IS LIKE NIGERIAN CONVERTED MUSLIMS CLAIMING MECCA AND SAUDI OIL FIELDS FOR THEMSELVES..


    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/09/shrewd-club-within-naive-bilderberg.html



    COMMUNISM WAS CREATED ON THE MODEL OF THE HINDU JOINT FAMILY IN INDIA..    THERE WAS HARMONY AND WEALTH WAS SHARED-- ONLY BECAUSE OF DEEPLY INGRAINED SPIRITUALITY AND RULE OF DHARMA

    IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT IN A WESTERN NUCLEAR FAMILY, THE PARENTS WILL SACRIFICE FOR THEIR CHILDREN..  ( AT LEAST 20% ) 

    THIS SYSTEM CAN WORK EVEN IN A SMALL ISLAND HAVING 300 PEOPLE WHERE ALL ARE TRYING TO SURVIVE

    BUT IF YOU TRY TO MAKE A NATION OF 300 MILLION DO THIS EXPERIMENT , IT WILL FALL PHUTT ON ITS FACE.

    THE FAILURE OF COMMUNISM IS MOSTLY DUE TO INDIVIDUALS WITHIN THE SYSTEM NOT WISHING TO FREELY GIVE AWAY THE FRUITS OF THEIR LABOR.


    Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one

     The full name of Rothschild’s DOUBLE agent Jew Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party, the political movement that brought him to power and supplied the infrastructure of the fascist dictatorship over which he would preside, was Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

    The Nazis were left-wing socialists. Yes, the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany, otherwise known as the Nazi Party, was indeed socialist and it had a lot in common with the modern left. 

    Hitler preached class warfare, agitating the working class to resist “exploitation” by capitalists ,


    Communism and socialism are umbrella terms referring to two left-wing schools of economic thought; both oppose capitalism.  

    Engels called  Marxism "scientific socialism"..  

    Hitler never harmed a Rothschild banker. why?

    Pierre-Joseph  Proudhon whose ideas were lifted by Marx was one of Europe’s foremost socialist thinkers..


    Jew Hitler personally claimed he was fighting against "Jewish Marxism".  In reality he was a Jew and a Marxist.  Hitler never harmed a Jew Rothschild’s capitalist agent or a Rothschild banker  ..

    In his 1844 “On the Jewish Question” letter Rothschild’s DOUBLE AGENT Jew Karl Marx  wrote:  “What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money… Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist.”

    Marx and Hitler were so alike in so many ways that Soviet Russian leaders had to distance themselves from their former socialist-fascist partner.

    Jew Marx and Jew Hitler were  two racist authoritarians cut from the same red star stone.

    FROM THE STYLE OF MARXs RAMBLING PROSE ( FIRST THREE VOLUMES)  I CAN SAY THAT THIS WAS PENNED BY A MAN HIGH ON DRUGS..

    In 1850, a spy for the Prussian police visited Marx’s home in London under the pretense of a German revolutionary. The report the spy wrote was shared with the British Ambassador in Berlin.  The report said, in part:


    QUOTE:  There is not one clean and solid piece of furniture. Everything is broken, tattered and torn, with half an inch of dust over everything and the greatest disorder everywhere ...  When you enter Marx’s room smoke and tobacco fumes make your eyes water ... Everything is dirty and covered with dust, so that to sit down becomes a hazardous business. Here is a chair with three legs. On another chair the children are playing cooking. This chair happens to have four legs. This is the one that is offered to the visitor, but the children’s cooking has not been wiped away and if you sit down you risk a pair of trousers. UNQUOTE












































    1. https://apnews.com/e043255bd33ab318f71d1947716a5b94

      QUOTE: U.S. President Donald Trump responded to the Parliament’s troop withdrawal vote with a monetary threat, saying the U.S. expected to be paid for its military investments in Iraq before leaving and threatening economic sanctions if the U.S. is not treated properly.UNQUOTE

      IT IS THE OTHER WAY AROUND- TRUMP BABY...

      USA HAS TO PAY HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF USD TO IRAQ..

      WE ASK PUTIN TO TAKE CARE OF THIS..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/sand-castle-movie-review-lie-of-2003.html

      PAST WAR CRIMINAL US PRESIDENTS ( ALIVE ) MUST BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.

      MILLIONS OF INNOCENT MUSLIM WOMEN AND CHILDREN WERE KILLED IN LIBYA/ SUDAN/ IRAQ/ SYRIA / YEMEN ..

      BUT IF ONE WHITE JEW DIED IN SOME BAR , ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE?

      WIFE OF FADNAVIS WAS CALLED FOR NATIONAL PRAYER BREAKAST MEETING --- WHY?

      FADNAVIS LIT UP VT TRAIN TERMINUS STATION AT NIGHT WITH THE FLAG OF FRANCE --

      ONLY THING IS THAT THE JEWISH DEEP STATE DARLING MUFF FANAVIS DISPLAYED THE FLAG OF NETHERLANDS INSTEAD.. TEE HEEEEEEEE ..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/national-prayer-breakfast-where-jesus.html

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

    1. https://apnews.com/e043255bd33ab318f71d1947716a5b94

      WHAT A CUNT TRUMP TURNED OUT TO BE..

      ONLY AN ATTACK ON IRAN CAN TRIGGER WORLD WAR 3..

      IRAN WILL MAKE A GAPING HOLE OUT OF ISRAEL-- 100% SURE..

      SAUDIS WILL BE SENT BACK TO TENTS AND CAMELS..AND WASHING ASSHOLES AFTER A SHIT WITH SAND..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/10/false-flag-attack-on-iran-could-trigger.html

      THE WHOLE WORLD MUST KNOW THIS-- ISRAEL CONDUCTS FALSE FLAG ATTACKS AND POINTS THE FINGER AT IRAN.. THIS HAS BECOME A FUCKIN' JOKE..

      ISRAEL DID A FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON ITSELF AND GRABBED SYRIAN GOLAN HEIGHTS WITH ENORMOUS FRESH WATER RESOURCES..

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_recognition_of_the_Golan_Heights_as_part_of_Israel

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Heights

      TRUMP , IF HE CONTINUED ACTING LIKE A CUNT--WILL BE IMPEACHED BY A SENATE VOTE.. HE HAS BECOME SENILE..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..


    COMMENTS MADE IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED..

    MAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW—

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/how-to-release-trapped-and-miserable.html


    TO BE CONTINUED --





    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 3 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0


    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 2, BELOW--




    LENIN WAS A SADIST ANAL SEX RECEIVING JEW.    HIS MARRIAGE TO JEWESS NADEZHDA KRUPSKAYA ( with a gruff voice ) WAS NEVER CONSUMMATED..    

    IT WAS A MARRIAGE OF CONVENIENCE ( LIKE MACRON)


    JEW LENIN WAS SECRETLY KNOWN AS AUNT LENA.. IT IS ONE OF THE BEST KEPT SECRETS OF RUSSIA

    LENIN  OFFERED A NEW WORLD ORDER OF EQUALITY, OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM, WHERE GAY MEN AND LESBIANS WOULD FLOURISH.

    BASTARD LENIN WOULD SUFFER BEFORE HE DIED OF BRAIN SYPHILIS AND A PURULENT PUS LADEN KOSHER CHRONS ASSHOLE.  

    LENIN CONTRACTED SYPHILIS FROM A MALE ASSHOLE HUMPING PROSTITUTE IN PARIS.. 

    Ivan Pavlov – famous for his Pavlov’s Dog’s theory – wrote that the "revolution was made by a madman with syphilis of the brain."   

    Lenin was treated with Arsenic based medication Salvarsan


    BELOW: COSMETIC JOB DONE WELL... WHEN LENIN DIED HIS FACE WAS FULL OF SCABS , OOZING PUS.


    THIS MAD JEW LENIN , AGENT OF ROTHSCHILD, KILLED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE..

    BELOW: LENINs BRAIN IS PRESERVED IN FORMALDEHYDE SOLUTION IN A JAR 


    THIS BASTARD LENIN HAS BEEN DECLARED A GENIUS BY FAKE STUDIES  DONE ON HIS BRAIN..

    https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/Lenins_Brain_Paul_Gregory_24.pdf

    In 1933, Stalin introduced new legislation that made male homosexuality ( anal sex receiving ) punishable by five years of hard labor throughout the Union.  These gays never came back alive.

    Lenin was the mastermind behind the creation of the Soviet Union in 1922, following the October Revolution of 1917.


    Lenin ordered the creation of the Cheka, the secret police organisation which was a model for Hitler's Gestapo. The Cheka were responsible for unspeakable cruelties - their methods included crowning victims with barbed wire, stoning them to death, dunking people in boiling water, and scalping them.

    Jew Karl Marx's Das Kapital has been continuously in print for the past century and a half thanks to glowing tributes by choots who pretend to be geniuses.

    This big, unwieldy book (more than 2000 pages of small print in three fat volumes) is full of mindless bullshit..  The writing is dense and difficult, constantly veering off into tangential points and pedantic debates with now unknown writers.  

    The ideas are kept deliberately complex ( baffle with bull, if you cant dazzle with brilliance )  and cannot be understood quickly by a intelligent man .

    This book Das Kapital packed with mindless nonsense will  now be discarded by the intelligentsia.

    It takes an Capt Ajit Vadakayil to declare that the Emperor does not wear clothes.. 

    I have just started off, and I am on part 3 out of 8.


    Led by Vladimir Lenin, the Bolsheviks put Marxist theory into practice with the Russian Revolution of 1917, which led to the creation of the world’s first communist government. Communism existed in the Soviet Union until its fall in 1991.

    The Soviet Union officially fell on December, 26 1991 when the USSR was dissolved and the communist-era policies of the region ceased.



    1. TODAY--

      ZOYA HASAN GETS FLUSHED DOWN THE SHITHOLE.


      GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:

      1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
      2 NOAM CHOMSKY
      3 SIGMUND FREUD
      4) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
      5) AMARTYA SEN
      6) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
      7) IMMANUEL KANT
      8 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
      9) ALBERT EINSTEIN
      10) ISAAC NEWTON
      11) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
      12) CHARLES DARWIN
      13) KARL MARX
      14) MAX WEBER
      15) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
      16) FIBONACCI
      17) EDWARD BERNAYS
      18) JOHN DEWEY
      19) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
      20 PETER D OUPENSKY
      21) OPRAH WINFREY
      22) RICHARD BANDLER AND JOHN GRINDER
      23) CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
      24) STEPHEN HAWKING
      25) SIDNEY HOOK
      26) ALFRED KINSEY
      27) BARACK OBAMA
      28) AYN RAND
      29) WILHELM WUNDT
      30) RENE DESCARTES.
      31) EMPRESS HELENA
      32) RAYMOND IV
      33) SAINT MOTHER TERESA
      34) LENIN
      35) ENGELS

      ########################

      BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “

      1) NIKOLA TESLA
      2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
      3) IE IRODOV
      4) ARYABHATTA ( 2700 BC)
      5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
      6) CHANAKYA ( 372 BC )
      7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA ( 2000 BC )
      8) APOLLONIUS OF TYANA ( KERALA SAGE WHOSE LEGACY WAS USURPED BY COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )
      9) "JOHN DOE"
      10) JULIAN ASSANGE
      11) SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA
      12) GARY STEPHEN WEBB
      13) GEORGE ORWELL.
      13) CESAR MILLAN
      14) HENRY FORD.
      15) PANINI ( 5500 BC )
      16) BHARTRHARI ( 7000 BC )
      17) PATANJALI ( 5000 BC )
      18) MANU (8300 BC)
      19) YASKA ( 5800 BC )
      20) JOHN CARMAC
      21) QUEEN DIDO ( 1600 BC )
      22) KANADA MUNI ( 6500 BC )
      23) VARAHAMIHIRA ( 2660 BC )
      24) VARARUCHI ( 2830 BC )
      25) VIROCHANA ( 10, 650 BC )
      26) MAHABALI ( 10,600 BC )
      27) KALANAMI ( 10500 BC )
      28) IMHOTEP / AYYAPPA ( 3900 BC )
      29) PROF HYPATIA
      30) SWARBANU
      31) PUTIN
      32) EDWARD SNOWDEN


      CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----

      1) SUHEL SETH
      2) PRITISH NANDI
      3) DILIP CHERIAN
      4) PRANNOY JAMES ROY
      5) AROON PURIE
      6) VINEET JAIN
      7) SHEKHAR GUPTA
      8) SAGARIKA GHOSE AND HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI
      9) SHOBHAA DE
      10) SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN AND WIFE NANDINI SUNDAR
      11) KAMALHAASAN
      12) AUDREY TRUSCHKE
      13) NOSTRODAMUS
      14) MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
      15) VERGHESE KURIEN
      16) MS SWAMINATHAN
      17) DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
      18) SANJAY R HEGDE
      19) MARK ZUCKERBERG
      20) JACK DORSEY
      21) THOMAS L FRIEDMAN
      22) ROMILA THAPAR
      23) IRFAN HABIB
      24) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
      25) SHELDON POLLOCK
      26) WENDY DONIGER
      27) BARKHA DUTT
      28) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
      29) SWARA BHASKAR
      30) KARAN THAPAR
      31) ADAM D ANGELO
      32) SAINT CRYIL ARCHBISHOP OF ALEXANDRIA
      33) N RAM
      34) GRETA THUNBERG
      35) MK GANDHI
      36) SONIA GANDHI
      37) TED KACZYNSKI
      38) ZOYA HASAN


    1. CHECK OUT AN EXAMPLE OF A JNU POLITICAL SCIENTIST.. SHE IS A UNIVERSAL PROFESSOR ..

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoya_Hasan
      I HAVE READ SOME OF HER BOOKS -- MINDLESS GARBAGE..

      ASK ZOYA BABY IS SHE KNOWS THAT LENIN LIED OF BRAIN SYPHILIS.

      I AM FLUSHING HER DONE THE SHIT HOLE..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_8.html

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
      1. PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
        ZOYA HASAN
        JAYATI GHOSH
        PRABHAT PATNAIK
        CP CHANDRASEKHAR
        SUHEL SETH
        PRITISH NANDI
        DILIP CHERIAN
        SANJAY R HEGDE
        ROMILA THAPAR
        TRUMP
        PUTIN
        MACRON
        ANGELA MERKEL
        BORIS JOHNSON
        AMBASSADORS TO FROM USA/ RUSSIA/ FRANCE/ GERMANY/ UK
        IRFAN HABIB
        NIVEDITA MENON
        AYESHA KIDWAI
        SWARA BHASKAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        KAVITA KRISHNAN
        PRAKASH KARAT
        BRINDA KARAT
        SITARAM YECHURY
        D RAJA
        ANNIE RAJA
        SUMEET CHOPRA
        DINESH VARSHNEY
        PINARAYI VIYAYAN
        KODIYERI BALAKRISHNAN
        DEANS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ TISS/ FTII
        JEAN DREZE
        BELA BHATIA
        SUMEET CHOPRA
        DINESH VARSHNEY
        KAMALAHASSAN
        VERNON GONSALVES
        VARAVARA RAO
        ARUN FERREIRA
        GAUTAM NAVLAKHA
        SUDHA BHARADWAJ
        ARUNA ROY
        GN SAIBABA
        JOHN BRITTAS
        THOMAS ISAAC ( KERALA FINANCE MINISTER)
        GITA GOPINATH - IMF CHIEF
        SURENDRA GADLING
        MAHESH RAUT
        SHOMA SEN
        RONA WILSON
        SIDHIR DHAWALE
        SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
        NANDINI SUNDAR
        JAYATI GHOSH
        KANHAIYA KUMAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BIMAN BOSE
        MANIK SARKAR
        HANNAN MOLLAH
        MA BABY
        SURJYA KANTA MISHRA
        MOHAMMAD SALIM
        SUBHASHINI ALI
        BV RAGHAVULU
        G RAMAKRISHNAN
        TAPAN KUMAR SEN
        NILOTPAL BASU
        AK PADMANABHAN
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BUDDHADEB BHATTACHARYA
        NIRUPAM SEN
        K VARADARAJAN
        MOHAMMAD AMIN
        MK PANDHE
        HU XIJIN ( CHINESE GLOBAL TIMES EDITOR)
        DEAN BERKELEY UC
        DEAN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
        K SUBBHARAYAN
        BINOY VISWAM
        TK RANGARAJAN
        JOHN BRITTAS
        KAMALAHASSAN
        PMO
        PM MODI
        NITI AYOG
        AMITABH KANT
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL MPs OF INDIA
        ALL MLAs OF INDIA
        CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
        DGPs OF ALL STATES
        GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
        PRESIDENT OF INDIA
        VP OF INDIA
        SPEAKER LOK SABHA
        SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
        CJI BOBDE
        ATTORNEY GENERAL
        ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
        ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
        LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
        ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
        AJIT DOVAL
        RAW
        IB
        NIA
        ED
        CBI
        AMIT SHAH
        HOME MINISTRY
        DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
        I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
        ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
        SOLI BABY
        FALI BABY
        KATJU BABY
        SALVE BABY
        ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        DAVID FRAWLEY
        STEPHEN KNAPP
        WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
        KONRAED ELST
        FRANCOIS GAUTIER
        RSS
        AVBP
        VHP
        MOHAN BHAGWAT
        RAM MADHAV
        THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
        CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
        QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
        QUORA MODERATION TEAM
        KURT OF QUORA
        GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
        SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
        SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
        MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
        BABA RAMDEV
        CHETAN BHAGAT
        AMISH TRIPATHI
        DEVADUTT PATTANAIK
        NALIN KOHLI
        GVL NARASIMHA RAO
        SAMBIT PATRA
        VIVEK OBEROI
        GAUTAM GAMBHIR
        ASHOK PANDIT
        ANUPAM KHER
        KANGANA RANAUT
        VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
        KIRON KHER
        MEENAKSHI LEKHI
        SMRITI IRANI
        PRASOON JOSHI
        MADHUR BHANDARKAR
        SWAPAN DASGUPTA
        SONAL MANSINGH
        MADHU KISHWAR
        SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
        GEN GD BAKSHI
        RSN SINGH
        E SREEDHARAN
        MOHANLAL
        SURESH GOPI
        CHANDAN MITRA
        PAVAN VARMA
        RAMACHANDRA GUHA
        ALL MEDIA OF KERALA
        MUKESH AMBANI
        RATA TATA
        ANAND MAHINDRA
        KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
        LAXMI MNARAYAN MITTAL
        AZIM PREMJI
        KAANIYA MURTHY
        RAHUL BAJAJ
        RAJAN RAHEJA
        NAVEEN JINDAL
        GOPICHAND HINDUJA
        DILIP SHANGHVI
        GAUTAM ADANI
        THE QUINT
        THE SCROLL
        THE WIRE
        THE PRINT
        MK VENU
        MADHU TREHAN
        RAJDEEP SARDESAI
        PAAGALIKA GHOSE
        NAVIKA KUMAR
        ANAND NARASIMHAN
        SRINIVASAN JAIN
        SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
        VIKRAM CHANDRA
        NIDHI RAZDAN
        FAYE DSOUZA
        ZAKKA JACOB
        RAVISH KUMAR
        PRANNOY JAMES ROY
        AROON PURIE
        VINEET JAIN
        RAGHAV BAHL
        SEEMA CHISTI
        DILEEP PADGOANKAR
        VIR SANGHVI
        KARAN THAPAR
        PRITISH NANDI
        SHEKHAR GUPTA
        SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
        SONIA GANDHI
        RAHUL GANDHI
        PRIYANKA GANDHI
        AK ANTONY
        OOMMEN CHANDY
        PC GEORGE
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
        ANNA VETTICKAD
        FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA THOMAS ISAAC
        JOHN ABRAHAM
        FAZAL GAFOOR (MES )
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        RANA AYYUB
        JAVED AKHTAR
        NASIRUDDIN SHAH
        KUNHALIKUTTY
        MAMOOTTY
        DULQUER SALMAN
        ADMIRAL RAMDAS
        KAVITA RAMDAS
        LALITA RAMDAS
        JOHN DAYAL
        KANCHA ILAIH
        TEESTA SETALVAD
        JEAN DREZE
        ARUDHATI ROY
        SHOBHAA DE
        GLOBAL TIMES EDITOR HU XIJIN
        ALL KERALA MPs AND MLAs
        TAPAN SEN
        SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA

    Jew Lenin, who was the first man to succeed in implementing Jew Marx’s ideas in practice, saw the need for extermination of the enemies of communism clearly. 

    The French revolutionaries,  Lenin wrote of the Communards in 1908, were guilty of excessive generosity. They should have “exterminated” their enemies. In Lessons of the Commune, he committed himself to “cleansing of Russia’s soil of all harmful insects, of scoundrel fleas, of bedbugs.”  


    Double agent Jew Hitler would echo those sentiments in Mein Kampf two decades later.

    Economy dictates that the price of a product is formed when the offer meets demand. Also, there are other financial mechanisms used to determine prices and to regulate competitiveness on the global market.
    The communist doctrine thought that the only way of distributing wealth was to form a so-called command economy, an organism that would determine how the resources should be spent.

    Naturally, this type of economy will substantially increase the disparity between those who were in charge and the layman.

    The history of communism is riddled with tales of atrocities committed against those who did not embrace the communist doctrine.

    Famine, mass executions, overwork, are tools of the trade which shaped the communism blood-thirsty demeanor.


    In the end, the society envisioned by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and others is just a utopia, making communism the grandest and most dramatic social experiment ever performed by humankind.  From the lack of rights to obsessive control, communism was like a time bomb ready to explode at any moment.

    The communist society founded on equality states that regarding remuneration, an illiterate hospital shit house cleaner  earns as much as a brain neurosurgeon saving lives in a surgery theatre..

    Marxism is a paradox. It raises voice for lower classes and workers but opposes industries which bring jobs, industrialisation which drives these workers’ lives. Soviet Union was the bastion of Communism and we all know what happened there. 

    The same happened with the Indian state of West Bengal. West Bengal had the largest and longest democratically elected Communist government in the world. Communist rule lasted in Bengal for over three decades in continuation, and it broke the state – they could have made it..

    The greatest challenge to Marxism/Communism comes from within. The system gradually decays and succumbs to the flaws of human nature and the sheer idealism and the impractical nature of the doctrine which is far from reality. 

    Communism makes the system stagnant and halts the progress. This stagnancy is what destablises the society and overemphasis of state and state’s severe control on every aspect of life from the ownership of property to economy severely curbs freedom of citizens and gradually builds a system which chokes the entire system, from governance to personal liberties. 

    The stagnancy is the ultimate bane of Communism, which eventually leads to the system’s breakdown - economy, industry, democracy, everything, everything eventually falls into decay because of stagnancy.

    The Communist ideology does good as a marginal pressure group but wherever it came at the centre of governance, it gradually decayed the system

    The Leninist theory of imperialism therefore concludes that the goal of socialists should be to instigate revolution in underdeveloped colonial countries in order to attack capitalism at its “weakest link”, thereby breaking the back of global capitalism by depriving the imperial countries of their colonies and instigating the collapse of the global capitalist economy. 

    This theory is in direct contradiction to the Marxist materialist conception of history where socialism can only emerge in the most developed countries where capitalism is exhausting its “historical necessity” - rendering itself increasingly volatile, irrational, contradictory and redundant for real wealth creation.

    Most people make the assumption that George Orwell’s Animal Farm is merely a fable warning us about the faults of Communism. In truth it is much deeper. The fable of Animal Farm is that human behavior is gleefully displayed in full within that story.

    Communism is like a religious faith but it has no clear goal and when they still try to achieve this utopia they don’t know how to manage it. When they have no one against them, they begin to destroy rather than build up.

    When VS Achutanandan became CM of Kerala the first thing this old commie did from hour zero was to break down illegal constructions with full gusto , micro managing the destruction..   People were appalled.  At least on day one he should have done something constructive ..

    He was one of the founding leaders of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and has played a major role in building the party cadre in the state of Kerala.

    Communism isn’t just only a failed ideology, but it is like a type of caveman’s religion, which reversed the development of humans and attempt to change it back to the stone age.

    Jew Lenin  was influenced significantly by Darwinism, and operated in accordance with the philosophy ‘fewer but better’, a restatement of natural selection.. The only piece of art work in Lenin’s office was a kitsch statue of an ape sitting on a heap of books—including Origin of Species—and contemplating a human skull.

     The ape and the skull were a symbol of his faith, the Darwinian faith that man is a brute, the world is a jungle, and individual lives are irrelevant. Lenin was an insanely  vicious man. Perhaps the ape and the skull were invoked to remind him that, in the world according to Darwin, man’s brutality to man is inevitable. In his struggle to bring about the “worker’s paradise” though “scientific” means, he ordered a great many deaths. 

    The ape and the skull may have helped him stifle whatever kindly or humane impulses were left over from a wholesome childhood.. ,Lenin would look at the ape while signing death warrants
    Mad Jew Darwin became an intellectual hero in the Soviet Union. There is a splendid Darwin museum in Moscow, and the Soviet authorities struck a special Darwin medal in honour of the centenary of The Origin.

    Acceptance of Darwinism and rejection of spirituality and religion were critical for the new movements of communism.

    Marx said, the communist leaders must work to ensure that the immediate revolutionary excitement is not suddenly suppressed after the victory. On the contrary,

    ... it must be sustained as long as possible. Far from opposing the so-called excesses – instances of popular vengeance against hated individuals or against public buildings with which hateful memories are associated – the workers’ party must not only tolerate these actions but must even give them direction.

    In other words, Marx was insisting upon fostering a frenzy of “vengeance against hated individuals” that clearly meant terror and mass murder. And this, too, was the signpost that Lenin followed in assuring the triumph of his revolution in Russia.

    Marx become an advocate of mass murder and dictatorship in place of liberal democracy and social peace   What intellectual influences worked on him that lead to his becoming the visionary advocate of what he came to call “scientific socialism” and the belief that the “laws of history” dictated the inevitable doom of capitalism and the inescapable triumph of communism?  The answer is that he was a slave to his blood relative German Jew Rothschild who wanted all movable wealth in his private vaults.

    According to Marx, worker's revolution would occur in economically advanced capitalist countries. However, when Lenin was leading the revolution Russia was economically backward imperial nation. Thus, Lenin changes some crucial aspects of Marx's theory in order to fit it into the Russian situation. Therefore, Leninism became Lenin's version of Marxism.




    1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED

      CAPTAIN, YOU HAVE JUST COMPLETED 20% OF WHAT YOU INTEND TO WRITE AGAINST DAS KAPITAL, AND YOU HAVE ALREADY DRIVEN THE PAST NAIL ON COMMUNISM..

      DO YOU HAVE AN ANTI-COMMUNIST MINDSET?

      LISTEN-

      I LEAD THE ONLY SILENT REVOLUTION ON THIS PLANET..

      SILENT REVOLUTIONS ARE PERMANENT.. BECAUSE PEOPLE USED THEIR OWN CONSCIENCE AND INTELLECT..

      YOU MUST REMEMBER THAT I AM THE ONLY PERSON ON THE INTERNET TO CALL COMMIE POL POT A HERO..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/11/pol-pot-of-khmer-rouge-great-cambodian.html

      AND I AM THE ONLY PERSON EVER TO CALL IDI AMIN A HERO..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/01/idi-amin-patriot-who-did-not-care-to-be.html

      I AM NOT A MENTAL SLAVE OF JEWS, LIKE OTHERS..

      AS YOU WOULD HAVE NOTICED JEW ROTHSCHILD CREATED / SUSTAINED/ SNUFFED OUT COMMUNISM, ON HIS TIME TABLE.. TO STEAL ..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

    JEW ROTHSCHILD HAS CONTROLLED BOTH OPPOSING POLES ( NORTH / SOUTH ) AND THE NEUTRAL EQUATOR.. AND MILKED MONEY AND SIPHONED OFF THE WEALTH  FROM ALL THREE SIDES .

    ARE THERE NO INTELLIGENT MEN ON THIS PLANET?

    WHY WAS THE ENTIRE PLANET IN FLAMES DURING SECOND WORLD WAR ? 

    ROTHSCHILD TRIGGERED THE WAR, SUSTAINED IT AND SNUFFED IT OUT ON HIS OWN TIME TABLE..

    THIS IS WHAT HE DID IN 1857 TO TAKE OVER INDIA AS RULER.



    TODAY WE WONDER WHY PEOPLE OF NE STATES LOOK DIFFERENT FROM INDIANS..  THEY DON’T HAVE INDIAN DNA.. THESE WERE HEAD HUNTERS IMPORTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD.

    Read both part of the post below--

    AS A PUNISHMENT, I WONT TELL ROTHSCHILD WHY NORTH SENTINEL ISLAND ( ANDAMANS ) IS IMPORTANT FOR HIM..

    HINT:  EVER HEARD OF TREASURE ISLAND ?



    THE JEWISH DEEP STATE WHERE ROTHSCHILD IS BIG BROTHER, CONTROLS THE CAPITALISTS AND THE LABOUR UNIONS.

    FORD KNOWS.. HE WAS THE FIRST TO EXPOSE JEWS ( BUT NEVER DARED TO UTTER THE DREADED WORD R
    Read two parts of the post below--


    WHO BROUGHT MUMBAI CLOTH MILLS DOWN ?  

    WHO WAS DATTA SAMANT?  

    WHY ARE MAIN STREAM MEDIA OFFICES SITUATED IN THE MUMBAI  MILL LANDS ?  

    HELL, EVEN TENDULKAR ( WHOSE SON IS ELIGIBLE TO PLAY FOR ENGLAND ) SECURED A “GO CART ” JOINT THERE..  PRIME REAL ESTATE ..



    1. UNKNOWN TO ALL

      IT WAS INDIRA GANDHI WHO ALLOWED JNU TO HAVE A COLLEGIUM SYSTEM OF COMMIE PROFESSORS WITH NO LOVE FOR THE WATAN.. AND INDUCT THESE HARDCORE COMMIES INTO GOVT MINISTRIES AS TRAITOR BABUS..

      SHE WOULD BE LATER MURDERED FOR HER FOLLIES , BY CRYPTO JEW KHALISTANIS EMPLOYED BY THE JEWISH DEEP STATE.. SHE HAD NATIONALISED ROTHSCHILDs BANKS..

      YOU DONT FUCK WITH R..

      Read all 11 parts of the post below--

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/02/jnu-den-of-anti-nationals-and-communist.html

      THESE COMMIE PROFESSORS ARE CHOSEN FROM ABROAD BY COMMIE JEWS..

      SAME WAY , ROTHSCHILD PERSONALLY HANDPICKED INDIAN RBI GOVERNORS..

      DO YOU THINK GITA GOPINATH BECAME IMF CHIEF ON HER OWN MERIT ??..

      THE ONLY REASON SHE IS THERE , IS BECAUSE SHE IS THE BLOOD RELATIVE OF ROTHSCHILDs AGENT COMMIE AK GOPALAN..

      DOES GITA BABY KNOW THAT MUSLIM MLA FROM TALASSERY ( KANNUR DISTRICT) KERALA AM SHAMSEER AND AK GOPALAN LOOKED LIKE TWIN BROTHERS AT THE AGE OF 20?

      LIKE HOW SHEIKH ABDULLAH AND NEHRU LOOKED LIKE TWINS AT THE AGE OF 20..

      MIND YOU, GITA GOPINATH WAS ADVISOR TO COMMIE CM OF KERALA PINARAYI VIJAYAN..

      WE KNOW WHO CHRISTIAN THOMAS ISAAC ( FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA ) IS.. THIS FELLOW HAS BEEN ABUSING HINDUISM IN A MOST SLIMY MANNER.

      I WILL WRITE HIS LEGACY..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
    THE FEMALE IS BRINDA KARAT ( RITA )-- WITH AK GOPALAN.  

    STUPID FELLOW EMS NAMBOODIRIPAD DID NOT KNOW THAT MARXs THEORIES WERE WESTERN EUROPE CENTRIC ,  IN A VERY NARROW SPECTRUM OF RICH TYRANT MILLOWNER VERSUS OPPRESSED POOR MILLWORKER..



    Jew Lenin coined the word “democratic centralism”lifted from the works of German Jew Jean Baptista von Schweitzer ( anal sex receiving homosexual )

    Here political decisions reached by sham voting processes are binding upon all members of the party . 
    Lenin described democratic centralism as consisting of "freedom of discussion, unity of action" ( maa ke mamta bhi hai , baap kee peepta bhi hai).

    Democratic centralism purported to combine two opposing forms of party leadership: democracy, which allows for free and open discussion, and central control, which ensures party unity and discipline

    For much of the time between the era of Joseph Stalin and the 1980s, the principle of democratic centralism meant that the Supreme Soviet, while nominally vested with great lawmaking powers, did little more than approve decisions already made at the highest levels of the Communist Party ( lest the Judge be sent to the Gulag ).. 

    Decisions made by the Party's top leaders de facto had the force of law— why not? There was a voting process , right?
    .
    The democratic centralist principle extended to elections in the Soviet Union. All Communist countries were—either de jure or de facto—one-party states.   In most cases, the voters were presented with a single list of unopposed candidates which usually won 95% percent or more of the votes

    At the 10th Congress of the All-Russian Communist Party (1921), Vladimir Ilich Lenin declared that the party was not a debating society in which all opinions were tolerated and freely expressed; it was a “vanguard” party whose role as leader of the revolution demanded extreme discipline and a high level of organization.

    Unrestrained discussion, he insisted, would produce intraparty disagreements and factions and prevent the party from acting effectively. On the other hand, absolute control by a centralized leadership would discourage new ideas from lower-level party members. 

    Therefore, Lenin argued, free discussion within the party should be tolerated and even encouraged up to a point, but, once a vote ( sham ) was taken, all discussion had to end. The decision of the majority ( arm twisted ) should constitute the current party “line” and be binding upon all members.

    ‘Democratic centralism’, which enshrined majoritarianism within the communist party in India. “The principle of democratic centralism… rules out all criticism which disrupts the unity of an action decided on by the party,” Lenin wrote in 1906.

    That definition later became the bedrock of the CPI(M)’s organisational structure..  the system was used  to stamp out differences of opinion and dissent.

    Prakash Karat had reportedly tried to prevent Sitaram Yechury from being appointed as general secretary in the 2015 congress. He apparently wanted Ramachandran Pillai to succeed him. 

    A furious Yechury is said to have skipped several meetings to convey that Karat’s move wouldn’t go unopposed. Yechury is even said to have told a reporter that “sahib, biwi aur ghulam [master, missus and slave]” were trying to block him, referring to the troika that includes Pillai and Brinda Karat.

    Cynical Sitaram Yechury recounted a story from the 1930s. Surjeet, at that time, was at a concentration camp with fellow communist legends. One day, to keep themselves amused, he made a bet: that he could consume a ser of ghee in one go.

    A ser is about one litre, so the other leaders thought he was just joking. Nevertheless, they smuggled in the ghee, and Surjeet consumed it in one go. He won, but now others began to fear for his life. They sat awake through the night, ready to assist him in case something happened.

    Nothing, apparently, happened. “Surjeet woke up in the morning,” wrote Yechury, “and with his lota went into the khet [field] and returned to tell his comrades, that ‘Urban communists will have to work very hard to understand the real India’.”

    There are lot of such jokes where top commie leaders in India used to discuss politics ( and coin slogans )  while having a shit in the field together in the morning.

    Once at the age of 9 just before elections in Calicut, I ran at 9 PM to watch a commie procession with red flags. One of the slogans was “ EMS SEY TOMMAS SEY , GAURIKKETHARAY MAASAAYI

    I asked my dad what this means .. He deftly changed the topic.

    Next day I asked my class mate  who was savvy in commie politics, as his dad was a commie leader .. He said “ TV Thomas is KR Gauri Amma’s lover , who climbs over the wall at night . These are inner fight mudslinging within communist party“

    55 years later , my classmate was spot on.


    Below: Thomas baby is 4th from left.. Check out a young Gauri ( Minister of Revenue) --today she is 100 years old..




    When the Communist Party split in 1964, Gowri Amma joined the newly formed Communist Party of India (Marxist); Thomas remained with the CPI. Though they were both ministers in the United Front government in 1967, they were estranged and belonged to different political parties. The couple separated in 1965 on ideological grounds but lived together in same house . Thomas died on 26 March 1977 aged 67, after a long battle with cancer.


    Thomas was an atheist like most of his contemporary communist leaders. A controversy erupted in 2015 when former Archbishop Joseph Powathil claimed that Thomas wanted to come back to Christianity and receive the Holy Communion while in his deathbed. However, several of his contemporaries including Gowri Amma rejected the claims, saying Thomas had never abandoned his faith in Communism




































  • Respected Captain , To be honest until you exposed these 'chors' , most of us would get overwhelmed by the usage of law extensive vocab , but you have completely exposed them .
    It is 'understood' that Stare Decisis implies, doctrines of precedence, albeit of persuasive value, do not apply to courts at the same level. Hence the Supreme court judges play god . You have also stated so may times that judges and prosecutors must possess sound insights into the dynamics of the modus operandi of corrupt practices aka not being mand buddhi which prevents the perpetrators of offences to be the major beneficiaries, and the state and the society to be the casualty.
    This also brings up the another MAJOR point which you have raised so many times before i.e. use of BODMAS , which invariably strikes down Stare Decisis bullshit.
    Again Captain , have said it before and will say it million more times , you are like bright Sun who single handedly is turning the fortunes of Bharat Mata.

    With gratitude
  • THE LAWYERS WHO WIN CASES ARE DRIVE MERCEDES CARS ARE THE ONES WHO EXPLOITED THE TAIL ( STARE DECISIS ) TO WAG THE DOG ( CONSTITUTION ) ..

    THESE BASTARD LAWYERS TOOK OUT PAST CASES TOTALLY OUT OF CONTEXT AND OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER OF THE CASE AND APPLIED IT LIKE A TEMPLATE..

    JUSTICE IN INDIA HAS BEEN TRULY BLIND..

    NOW DEEP STATE HAS SENT MADAN LOKUR TO FIJI TO SCREW FIJIANS ..

    MOST OF THESE CROOKED LAWYERS HAVE A "SETTING" WITH THE JUDGES..

    STARE DECISIS IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION.

    EVERY CASE MUST BE SEEN AFRESH.. WITH FRESH PAIR OF EYES..

    THE MELORDS IN DEEP STATE PAYROLL WANTS LOYALTY TO A BOOK CALLED CONSTITUTION TO WHICH THEY HAVE ATTACHED A LONG LANGOT OF “STARE DECISIS “..

    THE JUDGES WONT HAVE LOYALTY TO THE WATAN .. LOYALTY TO THE WATAN STINKS OF “BRAHMINICAL PATRIARCHY “, RIGHT?..

    MELORDS USE THE CONSTITUTION TO PROTECT SEDITIOUS TERRORISTS HOLDING FOREIGN GUNS .. THEY GET INSTANT BAIL.. HONEST CITIZENS LANGUISH IN JAIL FOR DECADES..

    PAKISTANI ISI PAYROLL KASHMIRIS WHO PELT STONES AND LOB GRENADES ON OUR JAWANS ARE DARLINGS OF THE MELORDS WHO CREATED THE RED CORRIDOR ( NAXALS ) AND ALLOWED ETHNIC CLEANSING OF KAHMIRI PANDITS TO TAKE PLACE..

    KASHMIRI STUDENTS WHO PUT FACEBOOK POSTS OF BREAKING UP INDIA INTO PIECES ARE THE DARLINGS OF THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY.. THE DESH BHAKT STUDENTS WHO RESISTED IT ARE AGAINST “FREE SPEECH “..

    5 JUDGES DECIDED THAT 1300 MILLION INDIANS CAN DO ADULTERY.. IF THERE IS A NATION WIDE REFERUNDUM ADULTERY WILL BE REJECTED BY 99.99 % PEOPLE, AS IT IS AGAINST OUR CULTURE..

    WHEN A KASHMIRI TERRORIST BOMBS OUR JAWANS WITH PAKISTANI ISI PROVIDED RDX, THE FIRST QUESTION ASKED BY JUDGES IS WHY THE TERRORIST WAS DRIVEN TO THIS EXTENT.. BAAAD HINDUS …

    COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA AND FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs ARE ALWAYS ON THE SAME PAGE..

    OUR WHOLESOME VALUES SUSTAINED FOR MILLINIUMS ARE NOW UGLY PREJUDICES.. WE THE GOOD CHILDREN OF BHARATMATA ARE NOW THE PROBLEM..

    WE MUST FORM MILITARY COURTS TO HANG TRAITOR JUDGES IN DEEP STATE PAYROLL.

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..
  • I HAVE REPEATED ALL THIS MORE THAN 60 TIMES..

    EVEN MY READERS HAVE NOT WOKEN UP

    HOW DO I WAKE UP JUDGES PRETENDING TO SLEEP.

    AS LONG AS WE HAVE DEEP STATE DARLINGS, DESH DROHIS PRAKASH JAVEDEKAR AND RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD CONTROLLING THINGS- NOTHING WILL HAPPEN..

    MODI IS TOO FULL OF HIMSELF.. ALL HE WANTS IS VOTES , PM CHAIR AND NOBEL PRIZE.. I WILL WRITE HIS LEGACY..

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    1. I HAVE WASTED MORE TIME ON INDIAN JUDICIARY THAN ANYTHING ELSE.. HUNDREDS OF COURT CASES ..

      THIS IS NOT THE JOB OF A BLOGGER.. BUT IN INDIA THE JEWISH DEEP STATE BRIBES BOTH JUDGES AND MEDIA..

      MY CONCLUSION?

      NOT A SINGLE JUDGE HAS INTERPRETED THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION RIGHT EVER ?

      NOW THE LANGOT "STARE DECISIS " HAS TAKEN OVER OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM..

      THIS IS WORSE THAN THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG..

      I HAVE NOT SEEN ONE SINGLE INTELLIGENT INDIAN JUDGE TILL TODAY..

      REASON?

      LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES--

      LAWYERS ARE THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL-- WE ALL KNOW THAT.

      AND LOSER LAWYERS WEARING CHEAP WORN OUT PLASTIC CHAPPALS BECAME JUDGES , ONLY TO COCK A SNOOK AT THEIR MORE SUCCESSFUL LAWYER COLLEAGUES DRIVING MERCEDES CARS..

      STARE DECISIS IS NOT ALLOWED -- WHERE PAST RULINGS OF STUPID JUDGES UNDER THE MINDLESS SYSTEM OF "JUSTICE IS BLIND SANS CONTEXT " IS ATTACHED AS AN ADDENDUM-- NAY-- LANGOT TO THE CONSTITUTION..

      AN EXAMPLE IS JUDICIARY DECIDING THAT DELHI CM KEJRIWAL CAN SAVE KANHAIYA KUMAR BY REFUSING TO SIGN ..

      FOR SEDITION CASES "STATE " IS THE CENTRE-- NOT THE CM OF DELHI , WHO DOES NOT EVEN CONTROL THE POLICE.. DELHI CM POST IS LIKE A GLORIFIED MAYORs POST..

      FORM MILITARY COURTS TO HANG TRAITOR JUDGES IN FOREIGN PAYROLL.

      HERE IS SECTION 141 --

      141. Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts The law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India

      SECTION 141 DOES NOT APPLY TO INDIA-- BUT ONLY TO LOWER COURTS..

      SUPREME COURT CANNOT CREATE LAWS FOR INDIA EVEN A 14 YEAR OLD SCHOOL CHILD KNOWS THIS-- THEY CAN ONLY INTERPRET LAWS..

      NOW JUDGE MADAN LOKUR HAS GONE TO FIJI TO SCREW FIJIAN PEOPLE..

      STUPID FELLOW CJI DIPAK MISRA CONTENDED " SUPREME COURT IS SUPREME "..

      NOW THE SHIPs CHIEF COOK WILL DECLARE " I AM CHIEF OF THE SHIP, I WONT ALLOW CAPTAIN TO LOAD SULPHURIC ACID IN HOUSTON "..

      SAME WAY SECTION 14 IS BEING USED BY JUDGE MADAN LOKUR ( WHO IS NOW JUDGE IN FIJI ) TO SAY ON NDTV THAT INDIA MUST TAKE IN ILLEGAL MUSLIM ROHINGYA REFUGEES..

      SORRY, INDIAN CONSTITUTION APPLIES ONLY TO LAW ABIDING INDIAN CITIZENS ..

      NOW CONSTITUTION IS BEING APPLIED BY STUPID JUDGES TO ANIMALS..

      https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/05/animals-accorded-rights-humans-indian-national-park/

      WHAT THE FUCK IS ALL THIS..

      DISMANTLE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY..

      NJAC STILL STANDS.. THE JUDICIAL REVIEW STRIKING DOWN NJAC ACT IS NULL AND VOID..

      NJAC WAS PASSED BY 100% MPs OF LOK AND RAJYA SABHA , A RARE UNANIMITY--AND PRESIDENT SIGNED IT..

      JUST WHO THE HELL IS SOME LAWYER TURNED JUDGE TO STRIKE IT DOWN BY A JUDICIAL REVIEW?

      DOES LAW MINISTER PRASAD AND ATTORNEY GENERAL KNOW THEIR OWN POWERS?

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-indian-constitution-does-not-allow.html

      PRESIDENT OF INDIA IS NOT A MERE RUBBER STAMP, AS CONTENDED BY JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA .. HE IS VESTED WITH ENORMOUS SUBJECTIVE POWERS BY THE CONSTITUTION..

      SACK LAW MINISTER RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD -- WHO IS A DOUBLE AGENT..HE ALLOWS JUDGES TO PLAY GOD..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

    1. PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF- ASK PM / PRASAD / ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR ACK
      PMO
      PM MODI
      CJI BOBDE
      ATTORNEY GENERAL
      ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
      ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
      LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
      ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
      AJIT DOVAL
      RAW
      IB
      NIA
      ED
      CBI
      AMIT SHAH
      HOME MINISTRY
      DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
      ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS PLUS TOP CHIEF
      I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
      SOLI BABY
      FALI BABY
      KATJU BABY
      SALVE BABY
      PGURUS
      SWAMY
      RAJIV MALHOTRA
      DAVID FRAWLEY
      STEPHEN KNAPP
      WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
      KONRAED ELST
      FRANCOIS GAUTIER
      RSS
      AVBP
      VHP
      MOHAN BHAGWAT
      RAM MADHAV
      NITI AYOG
      AMITABH KANT
      NCERT
      EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
      ALL MPs OF INDIA
      ALL MLAs OF INDIA
      CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
      DGPs OF ALL STATES
      GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
      PRESIDENT OF INDIA
      VP OF INDIA
      SPEAKER LOK SABHA
      SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
      NALIN KOHLI
      GVL NARASIMHA RAO
      SAMBIT PATRA
      VIVEK OBEROI
      GAUTAM GAMBHIR
      ASHOK PANDIT
      ANUPAM KHER
      KANGANA RANAUT
      VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
      KIRON KHER
      MEENAKSHI LEKHI
      SMRITI IRANI
      PRASOON JOSHI
      MADHUR BHANDARKAR
      SWAPAN DASGUPTA
      SONAL MANSINGH
      MADHU KISHWAR
      SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
      GEN GD BAKSHI
      RSN SINGH
      E SREEDHARAN
      MOHANLAL
      SURESH GOPI
      CHANDAN MITRA
      PAVAN VARMA
      RAMACHANDRA GUHA
      MUKESH AMBANI
      RATA TATA
      ANAND MAHINDRA
      KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
      LAXMI MNARAYAN MITTAL
      AZIM PREMJI
      KAANIYA MURTHY
      RAHUL BAJAJ
      RAJAN RAHEJA
      NAVEEN JINDAL
      GOPICHAND HINDUJA
      DILIP SHANGHVI
      GAUTAM ADANI
      THE QUINT
      THE SCROLL
      THE WIRE
      THE PRINT
      MK VENU
      MADHU TREHAN
      RAJDEEP SARDESAI
      PAAGALIKA GHOSE
      NAVIKA KUMAR
      ANAND NARASIMHAN
      SRINIVASAN JAIN
      SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
      VIKRAM CHANDRA
      NIDHI RAZDAN
      FAYE DSOUZA
      ZAKKA JACOB
      RAVISH KUMAR
      PRANNOY JAMES ROY
      AROON PURIE
      VINEET JAIN
      RAGHAV BAHL
      SEEMA CHISTI
      DILEEP PADGOANKAR
      VIR SANGHVI
      KARAN THAPAR
      PRITISH NANDI
      SHEKHAR GUPTA
      SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
      SONIA GANDHI
      RAHUL GANDHI
      PRIYANKA GANDHI
      SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA

    Below: This is Kannur-- the place where my mother , wife and children were born.. When arrogant Gordon Ramsey comes to Kerala he is extra sweet and polite .. because he knows when his ancestors knew only meat and potatoes , we ate from a menu with thousands of mouth watering dishes to choose from..





    COMMENTS MADE IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED..

    MAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW—

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/happy-new-year-2020-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html


    TO BE CONTINUED-






    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 4 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0



    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 3, BELOW--





    "In order to effect the destruction of all collective forces except ours we shall emasculate the first stage of collectivism, the universities, by re-educating them in a new direction."  Protocols of Zion, 16   


    BELOW: INDIAN LEFT IS FUNDED AND LED BY WHITE COMMIE JEWS.



    The fairytale of cultural Marxism provided a post-communist adversary located specifically in the cultural realm – academics, Hollywood, journalists, civil rights activists and feminists.   — Jason Wilson, The Guardian

    German Jew Erich Fromm was an agent of Jew Rothschild who was a kingpin of the Frankfurt School..   He was a Professor in Rothschild’s Opium founded Columbia University which sowed the seeds of Communism in JNU and brainwashed BR Ambedkar

    Jew Fromm's best known work, Escape from Freedom, focuses on the human urge to seek a source of authority and control upon reaching a freedom that was thought to be an individual's true desire. He sponsored Gay marriages and depravity. Fromm built primarily upon the works of Karl Marx.

    In the early 1960s, Fromm published two books dealing with Marxist thought (Marx's Concept of Man and Beyond the Chains of Illusion: My Encounter with Marx and Freud). 

    In 1965, working to stimulate the Western and Eastern cooperation between Marxist humanists, Fromm published a series of articles entitled Socialist Humanism: An International Symposium. In 1966, the American Humanist Association, founded by Rothschild,  named him Humanist of the Year.

    I have read “Marx's Concept of Man is a 1961 book about Karl Marx's theory of human nature” by the psychoanalyst Erich Fromm.  It was garbage ..

    Jew Erich Fromm declared that all sexual differences between men and women were socially constructed and rejected gender as something innate.

    "cultural Marxism" (lower C, upper M) refers to a strain of critique of popular culture by the Frankfurt School, framing such culture as being imposed by a capitalist culture industry and consumed passively by the masses.

    The Frankfurt school  played a huge role in the development of the American New Left, which gave us abortion on demand, feminism and homosexuality. 

    Why does Kapil Sharma need to have cross dressers in his show.. What is BIGG BOSS all about ?

    Cultural Marxism sought to bring the Messianic Era by interpreting Jewish Law in reverse so that all sins become holy.--  so that the things Western culture considers moral and good (such as religious morality, the family, and free markets) become evil and vice-versa.

    This demonic theology is the main reason why Critical Theory pushes for abortion, homosexuality, the breakdown of the family, feminism, degenerate art, and total communism

    Newton Souza was a product of Cultural Marxism. Here ugly art is called beautiful


    German Jew and Marxist commie Walter Benjamin was a Rothschild’s  agent.. He was funded by the Frankfurt School..

    Benjamin loaded his writings on literature and culture full of concepts and terminology from the kabbalah and the occult.In an early piece, The Task of the Translator, he claims that all modern languages are incomplete and can never give a completely accurate description of anything on the surface until society and language become "whole."  This is a clear reference to the kabbalistic "shattering of the vessels."

    In the Kabbalah, the shattering of the vessels is part of the cycle of creation and destruction that began long before this universe. ... Like the Big Bang theory of the beginning of the universe, these containers shattered, and their contents spilled helter-skelter into the void.

    Keeping with the semi-Gnostic kabbalist narrative of the "broken God" that inflicts His suffering onto Mankind, Benjamin claimed all human history was a history of suffering and all human culture was barbaric. 

    To him, the only way to obtain mankind's liberation is to identify with the Marxist "class struggle"... The "oppressed" classes need to fill their hearts with hate, thus provoking them to destroy capitalism and Western Civilization. He says: "Hatred and the spirit of sacrifice...are nourished by the image of enslaved ancestors rather than that of liberated grandchildren."

    This spontaneous act will bring about communist revolution, which will bring about a mass redemption of humanity. This is exactly analogous to the Sabbatean idea that the Messianic Era will only arrive once everyone is evil. Mankind will no longer be divided according to class, gender, race, nation or any other identity marker.

    The ideas expressed in this text would become the backbone of deconstructionism, the technique used by cultural Marxists to prove that words can mean anything and all things are "social constructs."

    Jew Benjamin promoted disgusting art and literature all while celebrating the death of traditional Western art.

    The Frankfurt School was behind an ongoing Marxist plot to destroy the capitalist West from within, spreading its tentacles throughout academia and indoctrinating students to hate patriotism and freedom.

    Make no mistake: Not only was Marxism always heavily based on cultural transformation—a fact one can easily verify by reading Chapter Two of “The Communist Manifesto”—but these post-World War I intellectuals were incredibly influential on Western academic thought. What they did was expand on the cultural aspect of Marxism by inventing a methodology called critical theory.

    Not only were founders of the Frankfurt School the ones who intellectualized the sexual revolution that inspired sex education, but they also led it. One such man was German Jew Herbert Marcuse. Shocking accounts can be found of the way children were sexualized in the decades that followed the 1960s.

    Herbert Marcuse was associated with the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Critical theory is the reflective assessment and critique of society and culture by applying knowledge from the social sciences and the humanities to reveal and challenge power structures. 

    Critical theory has origins in sociology and also in literary criticism. The sociologist German Jew Max Horkheimer described a theory as critical insofar as it seeks "to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them” Anal sex was described as “liberating”

    Jew Alfred Kinsey was a Frankfurt school agent

    Alfred Kinsey was known for his scale that plots sexuality on a fluid spectrum, including any and all forms of sexual paraphilias, 

    Kinsey was so absorbed in his own theories that he included the notes of Rex King in his 1948 book, “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.” King kept extensive records of his sexual abuse of children while traveling the United States as a government land examiner, and was given the name “Mr. Green” by Kinsey, to protect his identity.


    Despite refuted pseudo-scientific research that bears no resemblance to hard science, his influence on modern sexuality is pervasive—hence the reason that the fluid concept of human sexuality is widely pushed today.

    In sociology and political philosophy, the term "Critical Theory" describes the Western Marxist philosophy of the Frankfurt School..

    This use of the term requires proper noun capitalization, whereas "a critical theory" or "a critical social theory" may have similar elements of thought, but does not stress the intellectual lineage specific to the Frankfurt School. Frankfurt School critical theorists drew on the critical methods of Jew Karl Marx and Jew Sigmund Freud.

    So, how we can stop this endless sexual decline when we’ve abandoned the traditions that once protected us? It’s certainly no accident that its architects attacked the morality of society first. Thus, unless we reapply the armor of traditional morality, our society will continue to fall into moral degeneracy.

    An article on Spiegel Online, called “The Sexual Revolution and Children—How the Left Took Things Too Far,” explains how German communists encouraged sexual experimentation ( even with babies ) on an appalling scale in the 1960s and 1970s. Likewise, groups like PIE in the UK, and NAMBLA in the U.S., tried to turn pedophilia into another form of sexual liberation.

    One might be tempted to think this could never happen today, but the 2013 Estrela Report tried to introduce sex education through EU parliament, based on a World Health Organization report called “Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe.”

    For 0- to 4-year-olds, these reports recommend giving “information about enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s body, early childhood masturbation,” and to “Give the right to explore gender identities.” For 4- to 6-year-olds, the reports recommended giving “information about same-sex relationships,” and to “Help children develop respect for different norms regarding sexuality.”

    The core concepts of critical theory are as follows:--

    That critical social theory should be directed at the totality of society in its historical specificity (i.e. how it came to be configured at a specific point in time), and
    That critical theory should improve understanding of society by integrating all the major social sciences, including geography, economics, sociology, history, political science, anthropology, and psychology.

    This version of "critical" theory derives from Kant's (18th-century) and Marx's (19th-century) use of the term "critique", as in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and Marx's concept that his work Das Kapital (Capital) forms a "critique of political economy"

    Jew Marx explicitly developed the notion of critique into the critique of ideology and linked it with the practice of social revolution, as stated in the famous 11th of his Theses on Feuerbach: "The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.


    Critical theory is focused on language, symbolism, communication, and social construction. Critical theory has been applied within the social sciences as a critique of social construction and postmodern society.


    YOU HAVE NO IDEA OF THE EVIL INHERENT IN GERMAN JEWS. WHO WERE CANNIBALS IN THE DARK AGES .   

    ROTHSCHILD IS A GERMAN JEW.. 

    HITLER WAS A GERMAN  JEW.. 

    YET WHEN IT CAME TO THE PROMISED LAND, ZIONIST DID NOT WANT “LESSER THAN ANIMALS” MALE ANAL SEX RECEIVING  GAYS.


    AIB ROAST, BELOW WAS CULTURAL MARXISM.. NOW YOU KNOW WHY AN ANAL SEX RECEIVING BOLLYWOOD DIRECTOR GETS INVITATIONS TO DAVOS 




    Image result for karan thapar ranveer that is my position aib roast





























    BELOW: THIS DANCE IS FROM THE LAND OF QUEEN DIDO WHO SET UP MATRIARCHAL CIVILIZATIONS ALL OVER THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA, WHERE QUEEN RULED ( NOT KINGS ) ..




    THE WHITE HISTORIAN THREW A RED HERRING THAT FAMOUS ANCIENT QUEENS/ HEROINES RECORDED TO HAVE DUSKY SKIN ( QUEEN DIDO / QUEEN NEFERTITI / QUEEN OF SHEBA/ QUEEN HATSHEPSUT/ QUEEN CLEOPATRA/ MATH PROF HYPATHIA ETC ) WERE BLACK SKINNED AFRO HAIRED AFRICANS.   

    IN REALITY THEY WERE GORGEOUS KERALA THIYYA WOMEN WITH LONG HAIR, DUSKY SKIN AND WIDE HIPBONES.

    A SINGLE GOLD COIN FROM CARTHAGE STRUCK IN HONOR OF QUEEN  DIDO WAS SOLD FOR THE RECORD PRICE OF 431,000 USD AT AN AUCTION IN PARIS

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-ancient-7000-year-old-shakti.html

    KERALA THIYYA QUEEN DIDO WAS ALSO KNOWN AS THE WANDERING SEA QUEEN AS SHE SPENT HER TIME BETWEEN GLORIOUS ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS SHE FOUNDED -- CARTHAGE ( TUNISIA ) , CORDOBA ( SPAIN ) , ALEXANDRIA ( EGYPT ) , TRIPOLI ( LEBANON ) CYRENE ( LIBYA ) UGARIT ( SYRIA ) SARDINIA ( ITALY ) ETC ..

    IF THERE IS ONE ROYAL BLOODLINE WHO COULD CLAIM TO BE THE CATs WHIISKERS —  IT WAS THE CALICUT KING ALONE ..

    THEY HAD BALLS AND HONOR..

    THE THRONE WAS HUNG UP FOR GRABS AT MAMANKAM FESTIVAL , AT THIRUNAVAYA EVERY 12 YEARS –

    -- AT THE SPOT WHERE  6000 YEARS AGO, PARASHURAMA CAME BACK HOME WITH KERALA NAMBOODIRIS WITH 4 VEDAS AND 108 UPANISHADS FROM RIVER SARASWATI BANKS.. 



    BELOW: QUEEN OF SHEBA ( MALABAR ) -- ON CEREMONIAL OCCASIONS THE KERALA THIYYA QUEENS LEFT THEIR BREASTS OUT AS A SYMBOL OF WOMENs EMPOWERMENT ( APOLOGIES TO STUPID RAHUL GANDHI ) ..

    SOLOMON , WHOE MOTHER WAS A KERALA  NAMBOODIRI BATH SHEBA , FELL FOR HER BULLET NIPPLES..





    BELOW:  KERALA THIYYA QUEEN DIDO..

    A SHOCKED IBN BATUTA TRIED TO MAKE MUSLIM WOMEN ( WHO EXPOSED THEIR BREASTS ) OF MALABAR WEAR BURQA .. THE CALICUT KING KICKED HIM OUT TO MALDIVES..




    Dearest Sir and Ma'm,
    Happy Thiruvathira to you and your family!!
    You and Ma'm are the best couple i know of!!
    Love and regards.
    1. THIRUVATHIRA ( DANAVA CIVILIZATION ) IS ONE OF THE OLDEST FESTIVALS ON THE PLANET -- PREDATING KARVA CHAUTH BY SEVERAL MILLENNIUMS..   IT TOOK CARE OF WOMENs MENSTRUAL ( PMS ) PROBLEMS..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/02/thiruvathira-karva-chauth-of-kerala.html

      WITH INFLUX OF MUSLIM/ CHRISTIAN INVADER RELIGIONS, WE HINDUS OF KERALA HAVE FORGOTTEN OUR OWN PRICELESS CULTURE..

      THIRUVATHIRA DAY USED TO BE CELEBRATED AT BAALBEK TEMPLE LEBANON..WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY A TEMPLE DEDICATED TO MUTHAPPAN (PRIMATE SHIVA )..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/10/muthappan-deity-of-north-kerala-capt.html

      KOTTIYOOR PILGRIMAGE IS AS OLD AS SANATANA DHARMA, MORE THAN 50,000 YEARS OLD... IT WAS A SCALAR FIELD ( BRAHMAN ) IN THE MIDDLE OF A RIVER..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/06/kottiyoor-temple-oldest-temple-and.html

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..




    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 5 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0


    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 4, BELOW--




    Once I was in London for a month.

    I visited the Marx Memorial Library in London holds more than 43,000 books, pamphlets and newspapers on Marxism.

    The Library opened in 1933 and was a crowded house.. teeming with Commie. After all this planet’s greatest thinker ( sic ) Marx stayed in London for the 34 years of his life .

    I noticed that the library has nobody inside except the librarian at noon time on a Saturday

    I asked the librarian for the register , and found  people do not come there anymore..

    Now the commies has resorted to begging to keep the library afloat.. 




    Engels used to meet Marx regularly in Chetham's Library , Manchester England  ( to give him money and orders from Rothschild ) and the alcove where they met remains identical to this day.    

    Engels refused to meet Marx in his filthy pig sty home..


    Below: Nobody visits this commie atheist shrine where the Communist manifesto was born, today . I felt negative vibes and ran from here  

    This planet has rejected DRIPPING' CUNT Marx and his stupid book Das Kapital . Communism of Marx is dead...



    READ QUESTIONS TO QUORA 686 TO 820 IN THE POST BELOW --




    1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED OUT IN HORROR..

      CAPTAIN, YOU HAVE CALLED KARL MARX MAD AND A DRIPPING' CUNT – AND YOU HAVE BRANDED THE BEST SELLING BOOK ON THE PLANET AFTER BIBLE DAS KAPITAL AS STUPID..

      WELL, I HAVE ALREADY PUNCHED HOLES INTO THE PRIZED “LABOUR THEORY OF VALUE” TOUTED BY MARX.

      AND I HAVE PROVED THAT BIBLE WAS WRITTEN IN 325 AD BY JEWESS HELENA.

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/istanbul-deep-seat-of-jewish-deep-state.html

      NOW I WILL BURN MARX BABYs ” SURPLUS VALUE THEORY” IN THE POST ( PART 5 ) BELOW— CHARKHA GHUMAAKE ..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_11.html

      BY THE TIME I GO TO PART 6, I ASK MY READERS AND THE DENIZENS OF THIS PLANET..

      BE THE JUDGE..

      EITHER CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS A CUNT

      OR

      KARL MARX IS A CUNT

      YOU BE THE JUDGE

      I KNOW THE RESULTS — 100% WHO WILL BE THE CUNT..

      ONCE A CUNT ALWAYS A CUNT !

      WATCH THIS SPACE.. WITNESS ME..

      IT IS MY STYLE TO HANG THE SWORD OF DAMOCLES BEFORE- REPEAT- BEFORE I DO A JOB..

      A HAVE A TRACK RECORD OF 100% SUCCESS RATE .. AND THEN I SPIT INTO THE EYES OF MY DETRACTORS.

      I NEED Me KICKS, RIGHT?

      Capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
      1. PUT SCREENSHOTS OF THE COMMENT ABOVE IN WEBSITES OF—
        TRUMP
        PUTIN
        ANGELA MERKEL
        MACRON
        BORIS JOHNSON
        AMBASSADORS TO FROM USA/ RUSSIA/ GERMAY/ FRANCE / UK
        EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER/ MINISTRY INDIA
        RBI
        RBI GOVERNOR
        FNANCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATES
        RAGHURAM RAJAN
        MANMOHAN SINGH
        MONTEK SINGH AHLUWALIA
        AMARTYA SEN
        YESHWANT SINHA
        NOAM CHOMSKY
        PMO
        PM MODI
        NITI AYOG
        AMITABH KANT
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        AJIT DOVAL
        RAW
        IB
        NIA
        ED
        CBI
        AMIT SHAH
        HOME MINISTRY
        DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
        COAS
        I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
        FINANCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATES
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        DAVID FRAWLEY
        STEPHEN KNAPP
        WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
        KONRAED ELST
        FRANCOIS GAUTIER
        THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
        CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
        QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
        QUORA MODERATION TEAM
        KURT OF QUORA
        GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
        CHETAN BHAGAT
        ENTIRE BBC GANG
        PAVAN VARMA
        RAMACHANDRA GUHA
        MUKESH AMBANI
        RATA TATA
        ANAND MAHINDRA
        KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
        LAXMI NARAYAN MITTAL
        AZIM PREMJI
        KAANIYA MURTHY
        RAHUL BAJAJ
        RAJAN RAHEJA
        NAVEEN JINDAL
        GOPICHAND HINDUJA
        DILIP SHANGHVI
        GAUTAM ADANI
        DEANS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ TISS/ FTII
        JOHN BRITTAS
        KAMALAHASSAN
        ALL MPs OF INDIA
        ALL MLAs OF INDIA
        ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
        CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
        DGPs OF ALL STATES
        GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
        PRESIDENT OF INDIA
        VP OF INDIA
        SPEAKER LOK SABHA
        SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
        CJI BOBDE
        ATTORNEY GENERAL
        ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
        ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
        LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
        ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
        RSS
        AVBP
        VHP
        MOHAN BHAGWAT
        RAM MADHAV
        ZOYA HASAN
        JAYATI GHOSH
        PRABHAT PATNAIK
        CP CHANDRASEKHAR
        DILIP CHERIAN
        SANJAY R HEGDE
        ROMILA THAPAR
        IRFAN HABIB
        NIVEDITA MENON
        AYESHA KIDWAI
        SWARA BHASKAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        RANA AYYUB
        KAVITA KRISHNAN
        PRAKASH KARAT
        BRINDA KARAT
        SITARAM YECHURY
        D RAJA
        ANNIE RAJA
        SUMEET CHOPRA
        DINESH VARSHNEY
        PINARAYI VIYAYAN
        KODIYERI BALAKRISHNAN
        JOHN BRITTAS
        THOMAS ISAAC ( KERALA FINANCE MINISTER)
        GITA GOPINATH - IMF CHIEF
        SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
        NANDINI SUNDAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BIMAN BOSE
        MANIK SARKAR
        HANNAN MOLLAH
        MA BABY
        SURJYA KANTA MISHRA
        MOHAMMAD SALIM
        SUBHASHINI ALI
        BV RAGHAVULU
        G RAMAKRISHNAN
        TAPAN KUMAR SEN
        NILOTPAL BASU
        AK PADMANABHAN
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BUDDHADEB BHATTACHARYA
        NIRUPAM SEN
        K VARADARAJAN
        MOHAMMAD AMIN
        MK PANDHE
        HU XIJIN ( CHINESE GLOBAL TIMES EDITOR)
        DEAN BERKELEY UC
        DEAN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
        K SUBBHARAYAN
        BINOY VISWAM
        TK RANGARAJAN
        SOLI BABY
        FALI BABY
        KATJU BABY
        SALVE BABY
        ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        NALIN KOHLI
        GVL NARASIMHA RAO
        SAMBIT PATRA
        VIVEK OBEROI
        GAUTAM GAMBHIR
        ASHOK PANDIT
        ANUPAM KHER
        KANGANA RANAUT
        VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
        KIRON KHER
        MEENAKSHI LEKHI
        SMRITI IRANI
        PRASOON JOSHI
        MADHUR BHANDARKAR
        SWAPAN DASGUPTA
        SONAL MANSINGH
        MADHU KISHWAR
        SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
        GEN GD BAKSHI
        RSN SINGH
        E SREEDHARAN
        MOHANLAL
        SURESH GOPI
        CHANDAN MITRA
        THE QUINT
        THE SCROLL
        THE WIRE
        THE PRINT
        MK VENU
        MADHU TREHAN
        RAJDEEP SARDESAI
        PAAGALIKA GHOSE
        NAVIKA KUMAR
        ANAND NARASIMHAN
        SRINIVASAN JAIN
        SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
        VIKRAM CHANDRA
        NIDHI RAZDAN
        FAYE DSOUZA
        ZAKKA JACOB
        RAVISH KUMAR
        PRANNOY JAMES ROY
        AROON PURIE
        VINEET JAIN
        RAGHAV BAHL
        SEEMA CHISTI
        DILEEP PADGOANKAR
        VIR SANGHVI
        KARAN THAPAR
        PRITISH NANDI
        SHEKHAR GUPTA
        JAVED AKHTAR
        NASIRUDDIN SHAH
        KUNHALIKUTTY
        MAMOOTTY
        DULQUER SALMAN
        ADMIRAL RAMDAS
        KAVITA RAMDAS
        LALITA RAMDAS
        JOHN DAYAL
        KANCHA ILAIH
        TEESTA SETALVAD
        JEAN DREZE
        ARUDHATI ROY
        SHOBHAA DE
        JULIO RIBEIRO
        JAVED AKTHAR
        SHABANA AZMI
        KUNHALIKKUTTY
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        FAZAL GHAFOOR ( MES )
        FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
        ANNA VETTICKAD
        SWARA BHASKAR
        DEEPIKA PADUKONE
        ARURAG KASHYAP
        ADVANI
        MURLI MNOHAR JOSHI
        KAMALAHASSAN
        VERNON GONSALVES
        VARAVARA RAO
        ARUN FERREIRA
        GAUTAM NAVLAKHA
        SUDHA BHARADWAJ
        ARUNA ROY
        GN SAIBABA
        SURENDRA GADLING
        MAHESH RAUT
        SHOMA SEN
        RONA WILSON
        SIDHIR DHAWALE
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL MPs OF INDIA
        ALL MLAs OF INDIA
        AK ANTONY
        OOMMEN CHANDY
        PC GEORGE
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        GLOBAL TIMES EDITOR HU XIJIN
        ALL KERALA MPs AND MLAs
        TAPAN SEN
        SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
    BELOW:  WITNESS ME !


    THERE ARE CUNTS IN INDIA WHO INSTEAD OF SAYING “TRAIN” --  WILL INSTEAD SAY  “LOHPAT GAAMINI AAWAT JAAWAT YANTRA”

    SAME WAY CUNT KARL MARX WILL SAY “ SURPLUS VALUE THEORY ” --   INSTEAD OF “ PROFIT ” 


    RECAPITULATION:


    The labor theory of value (LTV) is a heterodox theory of value that argues that the economic value of a good or service is determined by the total amount of "socially necessary labor" required to produce it.
    There are three main points wrong with the Labor Theory of Value and how it fits into Marxian economics.

    First, the idea that labor is the only source of value is bullshit.  Marx had a very specific definition of labor, which stated that labor was the physical act of working, typically menial work that involves the production of a certain product or commodity. This is not the only source of value, because services exist in which the worker is not alienated from their commodity.  Marxism overall is a very narrow “blinker on” ideology that does not fit into the context of the real world.  PRICELESS ON PAPER SHIT ON TERRAIN..

    The second issue with the Labor Theory of Value interpreted by Marx is that it doesn’t take into account the skill or efficiency of the worker. I valued effective workers at sea..  Being effective is about doing the right things.  There are busy dimwits who achieve  fuck all.  Effectiveness describes getting to an outcome – even if it takes longer.  Anyone with common sense can understand that different people have different capabilities when it comes to physical labor, but this theory does not take skill or strength into account, the only measurement of the value of one’s work according to Marxian economics is the amount of time spent laboring.


    Third, Marx separates price from value, which begs the question, who determines the proportional relationship between the hours one works and the value of said labor?  It’ll be determined by one or a few people in particular, however in capitalism the value is determined by supply and demand, so by the average consumer as well as the people adjusting their production of a certain commodity.


    In short, the Labor Theory of Value, which Marxism relies upon to be a valid philosophy, is extremely flawed and is easily disproved, therefore the idea of “capitalists” making a profit that they have not earned is a falsehood, because management and organization of firms is also a source of value.


    The LTV is central to Marxist theory, which holds that the working class is exploited under capitalism, and dissociates price and value.   Price is determined by supply and demand.


    Since labor power is not produced by rational cost calculations, labor power value will not necessarily be "proportional to the man hours" involved in its "production." Even a 15 year old school child can figure this out..


    Marx baby’s  labor theory of BHALOO nay --value is without practical importance and  is dead and buried.


    In Das Kapital (1867),  Karl Marx says that the motivating force of capitalism is in the exploitation of labor, whose unpaid work is the ultimate source of “surplus value”.

    Marx’s justification of his theory of surplus value in the face of unequal compositions of capital, by interpreting total profits as a redistribution of surplus value, is bullshit

    Although value has a quantitative aspect this cannot be measured in practice. There is no way we can measure the value of a pencil, or a car, or any commodity directly. Nor can value be measured indirectly through relative prices.

    Marx took a higher rate of exploitation in the developed countries for granted.  
    According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold

    Marxism,  views the root of the economic disparities within the structure of capitalism itself.  Surplus value is the key to understanding why society is divided into a handful of super-rich ( bourgeois ) and millions of poor and working people ( proletariat )
    Jew Karl Marx used Jew David Ricardo as the starting point of his own economic theory of capitalism.  

    Marx baby spAke  that workers do not sell their labor, but rather their labor power— their ability to work.

    For part of the day, the workers produce the value that covers the cost of their own existence. In essence, what the workers produce the rest of the day is unpaid labor. 
    KHOON PASEENA LETHA HAI, PAISA DENA ROTHA HAI.

    Marxists call this extra value that the worker produces during the course of a day’s work “surplus value.”   Under capitalism, the owners of capital—the ones who buy the workers’ labor power—own the fruits of that labor. This is how the capitalists make profits—when the commodity produced by the workers is sold in the marketplace, its price is far above the amount the capitalist had to spend in wages to produce it. The capitalist takes the difference. The capitalist owns the surplus value.

    KHOON PASEENA LETHA HAI, PAISA DENA ROTHA HAI.

    To the employer, labor power has a very clear use value: it earns the capitalist a profit. This is the basic inequality built into the capitalist system. As long as one small class of owners controls the surplus BHALOOO - nay value created by the working class, there will always be rich and poor, wealth and poverty.

    KHOON PASEENA LETHA HAI, PAISA DENA ROTHA HAI.

    Marx baby contentedendeneded  that surplus value was the basis of capitalist profit. . In the drive for increasing profits, wages are held as low as possible.

    Marxists  aim to abolish the right of the tiny capitalist class to own in private the surplus value that is created by the millions of workers in society. Instead of serving private gain, the productivity of humanity and society’s surplus would benefit the vast majority of society—those who produce it.

    Check out the bullshit— whom is he trying to impress by integrating math into his mindless nay chootiya theories ?    Indians are not dumbos when it comes to Math, unlike the white man.. we invented Math 



    For Karl Marx, surplus value is critical to the expansion of capital. In the money circuit M – C – M ’, capitalists purchase commodities (C ) with money (M ) in order to sell these commodities for more than their initial outlay (M ’).  

    Surplus value is the difference M ’ – M, the profit that the capitalist makes at the end of the money circuit. Instead of hoarding this profit, as would a miser, the capitalist reinvests it in a new, enhanced circuit of money. The conclusion of each circuit, with more value produced, provides the starting point for the expansion of capital in each subsequent circuit.

    The problem that Marx (1867) sets himself in Capital, volume 1, is how capitalists can sell for more than they buy. Are some commodities sold for more than they cost? The answer is yes and no. 

    Marx assumes that capitalists pay for the full cost of inputs such as raw materials, which are used in the production process. The yarn that is used by the weaver is paid for at full cost. However, there is one commodity that does beget more value than its cost: labor power.

    AND MARX BABY CANNOT SEE BEYONG THE RICH MILL OWNER AND THE POOR MILL WORKER..   HE IS THE QUINTESSENTIAL FROG IN THE KOSHER WELL

    Digression: In Calicut , near the football stadium ground, there was a colony of Tamil scavengers.. My friend took me to watch their Ramayana drama. We both were nine years old.

    So we have black faced Sita, a Tamilian dalit man in a saree, with lot of talcum powder on her face and two coconuts as tits .

    She is sulking like mad—as her husband is going to the forest on exile without taking her.
    Ram tells Sita.  Please, kindly don’t come with me to the forest.

    Ram sings  to deter wife Sita  “ KALLUNDU KAATIL , MULLUNDU KAATIL, KAATU PANNIKKAL UNDU”  ( there are sharp stones , thorns  and wild pigs in the forest )

    Of course , Ram being a scavenger ( dealing with human shit daily ) cannot think of tigers , deep rivers or such majestic things..

    Sita in a deep sulk says in a gruff voice  “ NAAAA VARRUMM “  ( I will come,  in Tamil )

    I had such a terrific belly laugh that all THOTTIS ( govt paid scavengers ) looked at me angrily ..  
    I and my friend ran from there ..

    Even today if I want to have a good laugh, I think about it..


    On the one hand labor power, which is sold by workers to capitalists, has a capacity to produce output. The capitalist makes use of a worker’s labor power, say for eight hours per day, adding eight hours of value to the commodity produced. On the other hand it has a cost, which for the capitalist is the outlay of wages that enable workers, and their families, to subsist. 

    Crucially, the value of this labor power is less than the value of the worker’s output. The worker may have to work only four hours per day to produce value that is equivalent to the goods required for subsistence. But, exercising control over the labor process, the capitalist requires an eight-hour day: the worker is robbed of four hours of labor power that is extracted by the capitalist as surplus value. 

    For Marx, surplus value entails the exploitation of workers by the capitalist class.


    From a political point of view, the theory of surplus value has been an ideological weapon for exposing the injustice of the capitalist production process. The capitalist seeks to extend the working day to extract what Marx refers to as absolute surplus value (a reduction in the value of labor power would increase relative surplus value).

    Marx’s theory of surplus value provides the basis for arguing for a reduction in working hours.   Or KHALAASS KHALAASS—  finish your work faast in two hours and go home , get under the blanket , hold your proletariat balls and go to sleep.

    In making the argument that workers are exploited, the problem is that on the surface, workers seem to be paid a wage for the full working day.

    Key to the analytical power of surplus value is Marx’s assumption, maintained in the first two volumes of Capital, that commodities are sold at their values. The money value of consumption goods purchased by workers, using money wages, is the same as the labor embodied in those commodities; the money value of the output produced by workers is the same as the labor embodied in that output. Hence there is an assumed equivalence between surplus value, measured in units of labor time, and money profits, located in the circulation of money.

    In Capital, volume 3, Marx allows prices to diverge from values, the equivalence between surplus value and profits is not successfully maintained. Marx develops a procedure for transforming values into prices that is incomplete.  Whereas the outputs of each branch of production are transformed from values to prices, the transformation is not carried out for inputs.

    When the values of inputs are transformed into prices the consequences are severe. Total money profits are different from total surplus value, there being no reason why the category of embodied labor value should be at all useful. Since capitalists only care about money profits, why should Marxists use the irrelevant category of surplus value? Marx was  not so bright, he could not comprehend this..

    Embodied labor time -- my ass.

    Goods can only have value if they are sold in the marketplace, so what matters is the form that value takes in exchange—the value-form of commodities.

     Proponents of the value-form approach argue that in Capital, volume 1, Marx uses both labor embodied and value-form definitions of the value of labor power. In the “new solution” to the transformation problem, the value-form definition is preferred, with the share of wages in money income interpreted to be the value of labor power. 

    In this approach, the equivalence between money profits and surplus value is established, even when both inputs and outputs are transformed from value to prices.

    Hey, but with this value-form approach is that by abandoning labor-embodied values, Marx’s approach is drained of all content.   

    Surplus value" is a translation of the German word "Mehrwert", which simply means value added (sales revenue less the cost of materials used up), and is cognate to English "more worth". Surplus-value is the difference between the amount raised through a sale of a product and the amount it cost to the owner of that product to manufacture it: i.e. the amount raised through sale of the product minus the cost of the materials, plant and labour power. It is a central concept in Karl Marx's critique of political economy.

    Conventionally, value-added is equal to the sum of gross wage income and gross profit income. However, Marx uses the term Mehrwert to describe the yield, profit or return on production capital invested, i.e. the amount of the increase in the value of capital. Hence, Marx's use of Mehrwert has always been translated as "surplus value", distinguishing it from "value-added".

    According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold.

    Total surplus-value in an economy (Marx refers to the mass or volume of surplus-value) is basically equal to the sum of net distributed and undistributed profit, net interest, net rents, net tax on production and various net receipts associated with royalties, licensing, leasing, certain honorariums etc. .

    Surplus-value may be viewed in several ways :

    As a component of the new value product, which Marx himself defines as equal to the sum of labor costs in respect of capitalistically productive labor (variable capital) and surplus-value. In production, he argues, the workers produce a value equal to their wages plus an additional value, the surplus-value. 

    They also transfer part of the value of fixed assets and materials to the new product, equal to economic depreciation (consumption of fixed capital) and intermediate goods used up (constant capital inputs). Labor costs and surplus-value are the monetary valuations of what Marx calls the necessary product and the surplus product, or paid labour and unpaid labour.

    Surplus-value can also be viewed as a flow of net income appropriated by the owners of capital in virtue of asset ownership, comprising both distributed personal income and undistributed business income. In the whole economy, this will include both income directly from production and property income.

    Surplus-value can be viewed as the source of society's accumulation fund or investment fund; part of it is re-invested, but part is appropriated as personal income, and used for consumptive purposes by the owners of capital assets (see capital accumulation); in exceptional circumstances, part of it may also be hoarded in some way. In this context, surplus value can also be measured as the increase in the value of the stock of capital assets through an accounting period, prior to distribution.

    Surplus-value can be viewed as a social relation of production, or as the monetary valuation of surplus-labour – a sort of "index" of the balance of power between social classes or nations in the process of the division of the social product.

    Surplus-value can, in a developed capitalist economy, be viewed also as an indicator of the level of social productivity that has been reached by the working population, i.e. the net amount of value it can produce with its labour in excess of its own consumption requirements.

    Marx thought that capitalists exploited surplus value from workers and that to end such exploitation, workers had to resort to violent class struggle.  

    If Mad Marx was in front of me I would have kicked his commie ass, and kicked it good.

    THE THEORY OF "SURPLUS VALUE" IS THE BACKBONE OF VOL. 1 OF DAS KAPITAL. HOWEVER, ANYONE WHO HAS STUDIED ECONOMICS KNOWS THAT MARX'S THEORY IS TOTALLY ILLOGICAL.

    In the making of a product, the labor of the worker constitutes an important but not a unique contribution. The process and factors of production are very complicated; labor is merely one important factor.  People who work in big industries today know this.

    For lack of objective logical support, the theory and dogma of Das Kapital can no longer gain a footing in today's society. This book is long dead..it can never be resurrected.

    DAS KAPITAL IS DEAD


    LONG LIVE DAS KAPITAL


    So so so

    According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold.  

    Marx himself considered his theory of surplus-value his most important contribution to the progress of economic analysis (Marx, letter to Engels of 24 August 1867). ...   Surplus-value is essentially just that: the money form of the social surplus product or, what amounts to the same, the money product of surplus labour

    A surplus is used to describe many excess assets including income, profits, capital, and goods. ... Economic surplus is related to supply and demand. Net profit is the gross profit (revenue minus cost of goods) minus operating expenses and all other expenses, such as taxes and interest paid on debt.

    Because Marx's stupid followers have adhered too closely to the theory of surplus value and concentrated their efforts on labor problems, they have neglected other factors of industrial production and development.

    "PROFIT" IN MARXIST TERMINOLOGY DENOTES "SURPLUS VALUE". THAT EVEN THE COMMUNISTS WANT TO EXPLOIT THE WORKERS'"SURPLUS VALUE".  ONLY AN INTELLIGENT MAN CAN READ THIS BETWEEN THE LINES.

    Theories of Surplus Value forms the longest (about 110 printed sheets) and most fully elaborated part of this huge manuscript, and it is the first and only draft of the fourth, concluding volume of Das Kapital. As distinguished from the three theoretical volumes of Das Kapital, Marx called this volume the historical, historico-critical, or historico-literary part of his work.

    Marx’s theory of classes is based on the recognition that in each class society, part of society (the ruling class) appropriates the social surplus product. But that surplus product can take three essentially different forms (or a combination of them). 

    It can take the form of straightforward unpaid surplus labour, as in the slave mode of production, early feudalism or some sectors of the Asiatic mode of production (unpaid corvée labour for the Empire). 

    It can take the form of goods appropriated by the ruling class in the form of use-values pure and simple (the products of surplus labour), as under feudalism when feudal rent is paid in a certain amount of produce (produce rent) or in its more modern remnants, such as sharecropping. 

    And it can take a money form, like money-rent in the final phases of feudalism, and capitalist profits. Surplus-value is essentially just that: the money form of the social surplus product or, what amounts to the same, the money product of surplus labour. 

    It has therefore a common root with all other forms of surplus product: unpaid labour.

    KHOON PASEENA LETHA HAI,  PAISA DENA ROTHA HAI

    The income of the ruling classes can always be reduced in the final analysis to the product of unpaid labour: that is the heart of Marx’s theory of exploitation.

    That is also the reason why Marx attached so much importance to treating surplus-value as a general category, over and above profits (themselves subdivided into industrial profits, bank profits, commercial profits etc.), interest and rent, which are all part of the total surplus product produced by wage labour. 

    It is this general category which explains both the existence (the common interest) of the ruling class (all those who live off surplus value), and the origins of the class struggle under capitalism.

    The whole Marxian theory of surplus-value is therefore based upon that subtle distinction between ‘labour power’ and ‘labour’ (or value). But there is nothing ‘metaphysical’ about this distinction. 

    The worker is victim not of vulgar theft but of a social set-up which condemns him first to transform his productive capacity into a commodity, then to sell that labour power on a specific market (the labour market) characterised by institutional inequality, and finally to content himself with the market price he can get for that commodity, irrespective of whether the new value he creates during the process of production exceeds that market price (his wage) by a small amount, a large amount, or an enormous amount.

    The labour power the capitalist has bought ‘adds value’ to that of the used-up raw materials and tools (machinery, buildings etc.). If, and until that point of time, this added value is inferior or equal to the workers’ wages, surplus-value cannot originate. 

    But in that case, the capitalist has obviously no interest in hiring wage labour. He only hires it because that wage labour has the quality (the use value) to add to the raw materials’ value more than its own value (i.e. its own wages). 

    This ‘additional added value’ (the difference between total ‘value added’ and wages) is precisely surplus-value. Its emergence from the process of production is the precondition for the capitalists’ hiring workers, for the existence of the capitalist mode of production.

    Marx  has fallen PHUTT on his face with his bullshit book Das Kapital – it has has completely lost its power to instigate and move the people of the world.

    Marx's Theories of Surplus Value was edited by Jew Karl Kautsky, a  Marxist theoretician.  Kautsky was recognized as among the most authoritative promulgators of Orthodox Marxism after the death of Friedrich Engels in 1895



    At the time of his death (1883), Marx had prepared the manuscript for Das Kapital, Volume IV, a critical history of theories of surplus value of his time, the 19th century.  Jew Karl Kautsky published a partial edition of Marx's surplus-value critique and later published a full, three-volume edition as Theorien über den Mehrwert (Theories of Surplus Value, 1905–1910).




    Whether the rate of profit in capitalism has, as Marx predicted, tended to fall is a subject of debate.   N. Okishio, in 1961, devised a theorem (Okishio's theorem) showing that if capitalists pursue cost-cutting techniques and if the real wage does not rise, the rate of profit must rise


    Okishio's theorem--  if one capitalist raises his profits by introducing a new technique that cuts his costs, the collective or general rate of profit in society – for all capitalists – goes up.    According to Okishio, it contradicts Marx's law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall  . 

    Marx had claimed that the new general rate of profit, after a new technique has spread throughout the branch where it has been introduced, would be lower than before



    In Volume One of "Das Kapital," Marx said that capitalists made "profits" unfairly, by seizing the "surplus value of labor," which he defined as the difference between the factory owner's costs and the money he was able to obtain by selling goods produced in the factory.

    Since the workers produced the goods, Marx argued, it was they, not the capitalist, who had a moral claim on earning all the sales revenues. The capitalist was, in this view, essentially a parasite. This led directly to Marx's fundamental political-economic prescription: The "proletariat" should seize the means of production.

    Marx thought this would inevitably occur, in part because the proletariat was much more numerous than the capitalist class, and so would eventually win the "class struggle"— all it needed was sufficient "class consciousness" to recognize the nature of its predicament.

    He also argued that in any given domain of industry, competition between capitalists would lead to overproduction, intense downward pressure on prices, and a consequent collapse in net profits.

    This presumed tendency for the rate of profit to fall would inevitably lead to crises, because without profits, capitalists would be unable to continue financial accumulation. Capitalism, Marx and Engels thought, was systemically unstable. It would eventually collapse because of its "inherent contradictions," and give way to socialism, in which the means of production would be owned by the producers (the workers).

    The end stage of socialism would, in Marx's model, be communism — a system in which private property disappeared altogether, and everything was owned in common. People would freely contribute according to their abilities, and take according to their needs. Marx never explored in detail how that was meant to work — and as it turns out, it didn't.

    There are many inadequacies in Marx' analytical methodology, including "a long list of conclusions that do not follow or are downright wrong; mistakes which if corrected change essential inferences, sometimes into their opposites ( crossing the line of paradox)

    The labor movement, , is not necessarily socialist and clearly benefits over time from capitalist economic development. Marx does not have the cerebral wherewithal to even understand the laws of paradox

    Marx’ theory is mere "ideology,"   It is "unrealistic dreaming." while high on LSD
    This extremist competitor of socialism, communism was just a movement of squabbling intellectuals trying to dazzle with brilliance ( to baffle with bullshit)

    Marxism is in one sense a dogma laden "religion"–  because messiah and this planet’s greatest thinker Marx said so !   

    Opponents who reject this revealed wisdom are "not merely in error but in sin" and are not to be tolerated.

    Marxism provides "absolute standards" for understanding economic events and for guiding actions to achieve economic salvation from evil. It "promises paradise on this side of the grave."

    In the United States during the Great Depression, Marx' theory most powerfully affirmed "the feelings of the unsuccessful many." 

    This was a deliberate Rothschild game. Rothschild plans centuries in advance to grab power and money. 

    Even today Hilly Billy Yanks are wondering why and how the Great American Depression took place.. 

      

    TILL TODAY NOBODY ON THIS PLANET HAS FIGURED OUT WHY THE GREAT AMERICAN DEPRESSION TOOK PLACE..  

    ONLY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAS THE PERCEPTION TO TELL YOU THIS. 

    DURING AND AFTER THIS PERIOD, JEW ROTHSCHILD SUCCESSFULLY INJECTED COMMUNISM INTO CAPITALIST AMERICA..  

    COMMIE JEWS INFILTRATED TOOK OVER EVERY FACET OF AMERICAN SOCIETY..


    .
    Rothschild was so successful in his “ Commie indoctrinating” mission in five years flat Communism ( led by Jews ) was well entrenched in America .  

    Many working people on factories and farms—as well as professional people, journalists, teachers, writers, and artists—who had participated in these struggles were fooled into learning to respect Communists for both their words and their deeds, for their courage and commitment.  Media and Hollywood controlled by Commie Jews worked overtime..

    Communists and the CPUSA leadership took collective initiative to fight the Depression while the capitalist class was both panicking and calling upon government to do nothing and let the “free market” restore prosperity.

    Capitalist predictions that the Depression would be over in weeks turned into months, and months into years.  Rothschild allowed time for communism to spread..

    In March 1930, Communists in the U.S. and around the world organized “International Unemployment Day” (on what was also both International Women’s Day and the 13th anniversary of the beginning of the Russian Revolution) to mobilize against the crisis. The demonstrations in the U.S. drew hundreds of tens of thousands, surprising even the Commie Jew organizers.

    Unemployed Councils, USA, led by Commie Jew Herbert Benjamin, organized in cities across the country to block the evictions of tens of thousands of tenants who could not pay their rent, demanding work relief (public jobs for the unemployed) and home relief (aid for those who could not work, particularly women with dependent children and the disabled).  In rural areas, Communists also joined with other groups in fighting against farm foreclosures.

    Jew Benjamin, led massive national hunger marches on Washington in 1931 and 1932, the likes America never witness before

    The Unemployed Councils came forward with a new idea—Unemployment Insurance, monopolized by Rothschild’s  Jewish agents . The concept was so identified with the Communist Party that the then-conservative American Federation of Labor, in voting the proposal down in 1932, condemned it as a “Communistic program.”

    In 1935, the New Deal government of Franklin Roosevelt, elected three years earlier at the height of the Depression, would enact unemployment insurance, along with the most comprehensive public works, labor, and social welfare legislation—including collective bargaining, old age pensions under Social Security, minimum wages, and the 40-hour week. Together, they represented the most important victories for workers in U.S. history. Every trade union was controlled and led by Jews.

    Rothschild screwed Henry Ford for criticizing Jews..

    Read both parts of the post below--

    Rothschild’s stooge President Roosevelt would define these policies as an attempt to both reform, humanize, and save the capitalist system..  Commie W. E. B. Du Bois  would say that they represented a surge in the direction of socialism.

    While the benefits were less than the CPUSA and others advocated, both the leading role of the Communist Party in the Unemployed Councils as well as union and community organizing made policies that were considered impossible in 1929 realities less than a decade later.

     Marxism seemed to explain persuasively the causes of capitalism’s collapse, while also providing a vision of an alternative social order. The book Das Kapital sold like hot cakes in America and All Rothschild Opium founded/ funded Ivy league colleges brainwashed students using Commie Jew professors

    Freemason commie Jews would trigger the Spanish Civil war ( 1936 – 1939).
    In Spain, the victory of the Commie Popular Front ( founded by Rothschild ) in February 1936 virtually unleashed a revolution by itself. The organizations that orchestrated its electoral success allowed a government of liberal mice, marked by timidity and a fear of the proletarian working class and peasantry, to preside over their destiny.

    Meanwhile, the communist parties in the United States and in western Europe gave intellectuals—as well as teachers, lawyers, architects, and other middle-class professionals—a feeling that they were no longer solitary individuals suffering from the failures of capitalism but belonged instead to a vibrant community of like-minded souls, in that they were participants in an international movement larger than themselves and that they were literally making history. 

    For all these reasons Marxism, the Soviet Union, and the various national communist parties enjoyed a prestige and a popularity through much of the 1930s that they had never possessed in the 1920s and would never again enjoy after the Great Depression

    The membership of Communist Party USA swelled multifold during and after the Great Depression  . The commie party played a key role in Congress of Industrial Organizations

    By 1939, the CPUSA had about 50,000 members. In 1940, soon after World War II began in Europe, the U.S. Congress legislated the Alien Registration Act (aka the Smith Act, 18 USC § 2385) making it a crime to "knowingly or willfully advocate, abet, advise or teach the duty, necessity, desirability or propriety of overthrowing the Government of the United States or of any State by force or violence, or for anyone to organize any association which teaches, advises or encourages such an overthrow, or for anyone to become a member of or to affiliate with any such association"—and required Federal registration of all foreign nationals.   It was  principally deployed against communists,

    Rothschild tried his best to make Commie Jew William Z. Foster the President of America.

    William Z. Foster was a radical American labor organizer and Marxist politician, whose career included serving as General Secretary of the Communist Party USA from 1945 to 1957.


    Foster died on September 1, 1961 in Moscow.  The Soviet Union gave him a state funeral in Red Square and Khrushchev personally headed the honor guard. His ashes were interred with American Commie Jews John Reed and Bill Haywood at Kremlin Wall Necropolis


    Getting back--
    According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold 

    Marx' theory of immiserization based on an ever present "industrial reserve army" crumbles in the absence of this army in anything more than cyclical terms.

    In Marxist theory and Marxian economics, the immiseration thesis (also referred to as emiseration thesis) is derived from Karl Marx's analysis of economic development in capitalism, implying that the nature of capitalist production stabilizes real wages, reducing wage growth relative to total value creation in the economy, leading to worsening alienation in the workplace.

    Since it is not produced by rational cost calculations, labor power value will not necessarily be "proportional to the man hours" involved in its "production."

    Weaknesses in Marx'"Surplus Value" doctrine arise because the doctrine does not conform to "the plain facts of economic reality." When capitalism is viewed as a system in constant turmoil due to "creative destruction," it is survival rather than hunger for increased surplus value that drives constant capitalist investment and accumulation.

    Marx did provide a "Theory of Concentration" foretelling the consolidation of the great industrial giants ( read this as  JEWISH AGENTS OF ROTHSCHILD )  that would blossom towards the end of the 19th century, and "the social situation they were bound to create."

    Marx provides a synthesis of economics and sociology - but at the expense, of "emasculating" them both. 

    Political and sociological institutions are analyzed as variables instead of just as given factors, but at the expense of theoretical simplification "in terms of class warfare, or attempts at and revolt against exploitation, of accumulation and of qualitative change in the capital structure, of changes in the rate of surplus value, and in the rate of profit."  

     Politics and social developments are determined by economic factors and transmit those factor impacts back to the economy in accordance with Marx' economic theory.  The rate of surplus value is, therefore, an exact expression for the degree of exploitation of labour power by capital, or the labourer by the capitalist.

     Marxists immediately become experts at everything. Imperialism, wars, protectionism, the 1930s depression, "the whole maze of international politics," and much else in history lose their complexity and all analytical difficulty as they succumb to simplistic  explanations of Messiah Marx.

     Panting with impatience to have their innings, longing to save the world from something or other, disgusted with textbooks of un-describable tedium, dissatisfied emotionally and intellectually, unable to achieve synthesis by their own effort, they find what they crave for in the chootiya bombastic theories of Marx. 

    There it is, the key to all the most intimate secrets, the magic wand that marshals both great events and small. - - - They need no longer feel out of it in the great affairs of life -- all at once they see through the pompous marionettes of politics and business who never know what it is all about. And who can blame them, considering the available alternatives .

    Marx assures us that this rationalization is just “scientific analysis of value and surplus value.   

    Mad Marx’s  “ Surplus Value “ doctrine does not conform to the plain facts of economic reality. 

    Marx  spends some time demonstrating his deadly accomplishment.

     "The method of calculating the rate of surplus value is therefore, briefly, as follows. We take the total value of the product and put the constant capital which merely reappears in it equal to zero. What remains is the only value that has, in the process of producing the commodity, been actually created."

    When using "the rate of surplus value," the Marxist implies that the capitalist interest brings nothing of value to the production process but the money with which the worker is paid, and is entitled to nothing else in return for it.

     Thus, Marx arrives at his definitions of "surplus value" and the "rate of surplus value."

    "Surplus value" includes all the benefits "given" to the capitalist by labor - including not just profits, but also the use-values needed to maintain the capital assets used other than the consumables - machinery wear and tear and materials - actually consumed in production. 

    Even with respect to the consumables, the laborer has been so kind as to include their value in the value of the commodities produced for sale by the capitalist.

    However, when arriving at the "rate of surplus value," even the consumables are made to disappear by means of some pseudo-scientific mathematical games. 

    Thus, this rate is calculated only against worker pay - providing a suitably high ratio - a surplus value figure useful for propaganda purposes. When using the rate of surplus value, the Marxist implies that the capitalist interest brings nothing of value to the production process but the money with which the worker is paid, and is entitled to nothing else in return for it.

    With a 100% rate of surplus value, the wage laborer is being paid for only half his day, and is being forced to provide "unpaid" labor for the sole benefit of the capitalist for the other half.


     On the basis of such false premises - rationalizations completely detached from reality - Marx provides four senseless chapters on wages.

    Marxist economics as an irrelevant dead end  .. Poor Marx baby has painted himself into a kosher corner

    Marx wanted was overthrow of the social structure, not mere social reform. Marx considered that his theory was a kind of scientific socialism and that the realization of this socialism was an historical inevitability.

    Marx was a phony futurist much like Jew Isaac Asimov..Science fiction icon Isaac Asimov was suspected by the FBI of being a potential Communist informant.

    The Marxist theory of history, adopted Ram Rajya type  soothsaying practice. In some of its earlier formulations (for example in Marx's analysis of the character of the 'coming social revolution') their predictions were testable, and in fact falsified. 

    Yet instead of accepting the refutations the followers of Marx re-interpreted both the theory and the evidence in order to make them agree. In this way they rescued the theory from refutation; but they did so at the price of adopting a device which made it irrefutable. 

    They thus gave a 'conventionalist twist' to the theory; and by this stratagem they destroyed its much advertised claim to scientific status.


    Marx harbored a deep hatred for mankind . He encouraged dictatorship by the proletariat. But he also wanted the proletariat to sacrifice themselves in their own cause. 

    Das Kapital was written with indignant emotion and in a state of unbalanced reasoning. Its letter and content were vitriolic and instigative. 

    Because of his ignorance of the real motive force of social evolution, Marx's materialistic theory became the ugliest radicalism in human history.




    1. https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_11.html

      DONALD TRUMP

      LISTEN UP AND LISTEN GOOD..
      DO YOU KNOW HOW JEWISH COMMUNISM INFILTRATED INTO EVERY PORE OF AMERICA ?..

      IT WAS CAUSED BY A STOCK MARKET CRASH DELIBERATELY DONE BY GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD --WHICH CAUSED THE "GREAT AMERICAN DEPRESSION"..

      BEFORE YOU DRAIN THE SWAMP, FIRST FIND OUT WHERE IT IS.. COMMONSENSE !

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_11.html

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
      1. PUT SCREENSHOTS OF THE COMMENT ABOVE IN WEBSITES OF—
        TRUMP
        PUTIN
        ANGELA MERKEL
        MACRON
        BORIS JOHNSON
        AMBASSADORS TO FROM USA/ RUSSIA/ GERMAY/ FRANCE / UK
        EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER/ MINISTRY INDIA
        RBI
        RBI GOVERNOR
        FNANCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATES
        RAGHURAM RAJAN
        MANMOHAN SINGH
        MONTEK SINGH AHLUWALIA
        AMARTYA SEN
        YESHWANT SINHA
        NOAM CHOMSKY
        PMO
        PM MODI
        NITI AYOG
        AMITABH KANT
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        AJIT DOVAL
        RAW
        IB
        NIA
        ED
        CBI
        AMIT SHAH
        HOME MINISTRY
        DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
        COAS
        I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
        FINANCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATES
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        DAVID FRAWLEY
        STEPHEN KNAPP
        WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
        KONRAED ELST
        FRANCOIS GAUTIER
        THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
        CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
        QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
        QUORA MODERATION TEAM
        KURT OF QUORA
        GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
        CHETAN BHAGAT
        ENTIRE BBC GANG
        PAVAN VARMA
        RAMACHANDRA GUHA
        MUKESH AMBANI
        RATA TATA
        ANAND MAHINDRA
        KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
        LAXMI NARAYAN MITTAL
        AZIM PREMJI
        KAANIYA MURTHY
        RAHUL BAJAJ
        RAJAN RAHEJA
        NAVEEN JINDAL
        GOPICHAND HINDUJA
        DILIP SHANGHVI
        GAUTAM ADANI
        DEANS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ TISS/ FTII
        JOHN BRITTAS
        KAMALAHASSAN
        ALL MPs OF INDIA
        ALL MLAs OF INDIA
        ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
        CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
        DGPs OF ALL STATES
        GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
        PRESIDENT OF INDIA
        VP OF INDIA
        SPEAKER LOK SABHA
        SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
        CJI BOBDE
        ATTORNEY GENERAL
        ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
        ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
        LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
        ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
        RSS
        AVBP
        VHP
        MOHAN BHAGWAT
        RAM MADHAV
        ZOYA HASAN
        JAYATI GHOSH
        PRABHAT PATNAIK
        CP CHANDRASEKHAR
        DILIP CHERIAN
        SANJAY R HEGDE
        ROMILA THAPAR
        IRFAN HABIB
        NIVEDITA MENON
        AYESHA KIDWAI
        SWARA BHASKAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        RANA AYYUB
        KAVITA KRISHNAN
        PRAKASH KARAT
        BRINDA KARAT
        SITARAM YECHURY
        D RAJA
        ANNIE RAJA
        SUMEET CHOPRA
        DINESH VARSHNEY
        PINARAYI VIYAYAN
        KODIYERI BALAKRISHNAN
        JOHN BRITTAS
        THOMAS ISAAC ( KERALA FINANCE MINISTER)
        GITA GOPINATH - IMF CHIEF
        SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
        NANDINI SUNDAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BIMAN BOSE
        MANIK SARKAR
        HANNAN MOLLAH
        MA BABY
        SURJYA KANTA MISHRA
        MOHAMMAD SALIM
        SUBHASHINI ALI
        BV RAGHAVULU
        G RAMAKRISHNAN
        TAPAN KUMAR SEN
        NILOTPAL BASU
        AK PADMANABHAN
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BUDDHADEB BHATTACHARYA
        NIRUPAM SEN
        K VARADARAJAN
        MOHAMMAD AMIN
        MK PANDHE
        HU XIJIN ( CHINESE GLOBAL TIMES EDITOR)
        DEAN BERKELEY UC
        DEAN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
        K SUBBHARAYAN
        BINOY VISWAM
        TK RANGARAJAN
        SOLI BABY
        FALI BABY
        KATJU BABY
        SALVE BABY
        ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        NALIN KOHLI
        GVL NARASIMHA RAO
        SAMBIT PATRA
        VIVEK OBEROI
        GAUTAM GAMBHIR
        ASHOK PANDIT
        ANUPAM KHER
        KANGANA RANAUT
        VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
        KIRON KHER
        MEENAKSHI LEKHI
        SMRITI IRANI
        PRASOON JOSHI
        MADHUR BHANDARKAR
        SWAPAN DASGUPTA
        SONAL MANSINGH
        MADHU KISHWAR
        SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
        GEN GD BAKSHI
        RSN SINGH
        E SREEDHARAN
        MOHANLAL
        SURESH GOPI
        CHANDAN MITRA
        THE QUINT
        THE SCROLL
        THE WIRE
        THE PRINT
        MK VENU
        MADHU TREHAN
        RAJDEEP SARDESAI
        PAAGALIKA GHOSE
        NAVIKA KUMAR
        ANAND NARASIMHAN
        SRINIVASAN JAIN
        SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
        VIKRAM CHANDRA
        NIDHI RAZDAN
        FAYE DSOUZA
        ZAKKA JACOB
        RAVISH KUMAR
        PRANNOY JAMES ROY
        AROON PURIE
        VINEET JAIN
        RAGHAV BAHL
        SEEMA CHISTI
        DILEEP PADGOANKAR
        VIR SANGHVI
        KARAN THAPAR
        PRITISH NANDI
        SHEKHAR GUPTA
        JAVED AKHTAR
        NASIRUDDIN SHAH
        KUNHALIKUTTY
        MAMOOTTY
        DULQUER SALMAN
        ADMIRAL RAMDAS
        KAVITA RAMDAS
        LALITA RAMDAS
        JOHN DAYAL
        KANCHA ILAIH
        TEESTA SETALVAD
        JEAN DREZE
        ARUDHATI ROY
        SHOBHAA DE
        JULIO RIBEIRO
        JAVED AKTHAR
        SHABANA AZMI
        KUNHALIKKUTTY
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        FAZAL GHAFOOR ( MES )
        FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
        ANNA VETTICKAD
        SWARA BHASKAR
        DEEPIKA PADUKONE
        ARURAG KASHYAP
        ADVANI
        MURLI MNOHAR JOSHI
        KAMALAHASSAN
        VERNON GONSALVES
        VARAVARA RAO
        ARUN FERREIRA
        GAUTAM NAVLAKHA
        SUDHA BHARADWAJ
        ARUNA ROY
        GN SAIBABA
        SURENDRA GADLING
        MAHESH RAUT
        SHOMA SEN
        RONA WILSON
        SIDHIR DHAWALE
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL MPs OF INDIA
        ALL MLAs OF INDIA
        AK ANTONY
        OOMMEN CHANDY
        PC GEORGE
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        GLOBAL TIMES EDITOR HU XIJIN
        ALL KERALA MPs AND MLAs
        TAPAN SEN
        SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA





























    COMMENTS MADE IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED..

    MAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW—

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx.html

    TO BE CONTINUED --





    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..


    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 6 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0

    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 5, BELOW--







    1. COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA IS USING BHAGAT SINGHs POSTERS.. BHAGAT SINGH WAS NOT A COMMUNIST..

      TWO DAYS AGO, STUPID FELLOW SUMEET CHOPRA WAS TELLING ARNAB GOSWAMI ON REPUBLIC TV DEBATE THAT BHAGAT SINGH WAS A MEMBER OF COMMUNIST PARTY ,.. IT IS A LIE.


      IN THE POST ABOVE COMMIE HAVE STARTED USING POTHERI KUNJAMBUs NAME IN COMMIE JOURNALS..

      BRENNAN COLLEGE ( KANNUR DISTRICT ) IS WERE PINARAYI VIJAYAN STUDIED AND IS THE OLDEST COMMIE HOTBED OF INDIA... JNU IS NOTHING .. YOU SHOULD SEE THE COMMIE LIBRARY OF BRENNAN COLLEGE..

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Brennen_College,_Thalassery

      POTHERY KUNJABU WAS FROM THE RICHEST AND MOST ANCIENT JOINT FAMILY OF KANNUR , POTHERY -- EVERY BODY KNOWS THIS IN KANNUR..

      PINARAYI VIJAYAN WAS A WEAVER IN HIS SUB CONTRACTORs COMPANY IN KANNUR..

      HOW DO I KNOW?

      POTHERY KUNJAMBU IS MY WIFEs GRANDFATHERs ELDER BROTHER.. WHO WENT IN CAR WHEN THE KING OF KANNUR DID NOT HAVE ONE.. THEY HAD THE FIRST TELEPHONE..

      WHEN MY FIRE WAS A SMALL GIRL SHE LOVED TO PLAY WITH THE OLD TELEPHONE, IN THE COMPANY ( WEST COAST WEAVING ) TO RING UP HER UNCLE -- BY CRANKING THE HANDLE..

      YES-- POTHERY FAMILY EMPLOYED COMMIES AS WEAVERS AND WERE KIND AND GENEROUS BOSSES..

      KANNUR IS KNOWN AS THE LAND OF LOOMS AND LORE..

      LOOMS BECAUSE KERALA THIYYA WOMEN WENT TO SYRIA UGARIT IN THOUSANDS TO SET UP WEAVING FACTORIES THERE..IN ANCIENT TIMES..

      READ QUESTIONS TO QUORA 474 AND 476..


      LORE BECAUSE MEN WERE KALARI FIGHTERS .. THE BALLADS ( VADAKKAN PATTU ) OF KANNUR ABOUT WOMEN FIGHTERS LIKE KERALA THIYYA QUEEN UNNIYARCHA AND TACHOLI OTHENAN OF MALABAR STILL IS SUNG TODAY..

      MY MOTHER IS FROM KANNUR.. ONE OF HER GREAT GREAT GRANDFATHERS IS NAMED OTHENAN.. THESE ARE HONORABLE NAMES EVERYBODY CANNOT USE..


      READ QUESTION TO QUORA 487 IN THE LINK ABOVE..

      IF I HAD NOT WRITTEN ALL THIS THIS CULTURE OF "LOOM AND LORE" OF KANNUR WOULD BE LOST FOREVER.. MY WIFEs FAMILY , THE OLDEST IN KANNUR.. WAS PART OF ALL THIS..

      THE STORY OF UNNIYARCHA HAS BEEN MURDERED BY THE WHITE INVADER.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puthooramputhri_Unniyarcha

      PUTHURAN VEEDU WAS A KERALA THIYYA FAMILY- NOT NAIR FAMILY.. THIYYAS WERE THE ORIGINAL HONOURABLE KALARI FIGHTERS NOT NAIRS WHO DID KNOW KNOW WHO THEIR FATHERS WERE FROM 4000 BC TO 1933 AD..

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hpuFhr1dEM


      TODAY NOBODY IN CALICUT KNOWS WHAT IS MAMANKAM FEST .. THIS WAS PART OF OUR CALICUT CULTURE..
      ROTHSCHILD BECAME THE RICHEST MAN ON THE PLANET IN 1799 BY STEALING CALICUT KINGs GOLD.. HE SEND JEW TIPU SULTAN TO DO THE DIRTY BEE DRONE COLLECTION WORK BY BLASTING TEMPLE VAULTS..


      TODAY INDIAN CULTURE HAS BEEN USURPED BY ANAL SEX RECEIVING BOLLYWOOD DIRECTORS.. SEE DEEPIKA PAUDUKONE ( YESTERDAY SHE WAS ON BIGG BOSS ) SITTING IN THE FRONT ROW AND GUFFAWING AT ANAL SEX JOKES, LIKE A DONKEY WHEN IT SEES FRESH SHIT..

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ADoZ0CnV34

      95% OF THE AUDIENCE -- WERE CULTURELESS PEOPLE WHOSE MOTHERS WERE WHORES AND WHO LIVED IN CHAWLS WHEN INDIA BECAME INDEPENDENT IN 1947..

      IS THIS OUR CULTURE?

      IS THIS OUR PRIDE?

      TODAY COMMIES OF KERALA HONOUR HERMANN GUNDERT EVERY YEAR...


      WHAT DO THEY KNOW?

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

    BELOW: AS KIDS WE SANG THIS SONG WHILE COLLECTING FLOWERS FOR MAHABALI ( ONAM )..  

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/onam-our-only-link-to-planets-oldest.html

    THIS IS OUR CULTURE.. 

    THIS IS WHO WE ARE.. 

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/secrets-of-12000-year-old-machu-picchu.html

    WE ARE NOT FROM THE SHIT HOLE WHERE THE ILK OF KANHAIYA KUMAR OR ROMILA THAPAR WAS BORN.. 

    ACCORDING TO ROTHSCHILDs COMMIE AGENT ROMILA THAPAR INDIAN HISTORY STARTS WITH THE FAKE PIG EATING BUDDHA..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/deliberately-buried-truths-about-buddha.html

    MODI INAUGURATES AKSHARDHAM TEMPLES ABROAD ( WHERE ROTHSCHILDs AGENT GHANSHYAM PANDE IS GOD ) OF ANTWERP/ DUBAI DIAMOND LOBBY INDIAN GUJARATI JEWS  AND CALLS THEM HINDU TEMPLES.





    1. https://twitter.com/isaifpatel/status/1197031801606352897

      IF YOU GO TO FORBIDDEN AREAS OF TAJ MAHAL ( BRICKED UP ) THERE IS A LARGE KALASHA KUMBHAM ON THE FLOOR , MOTIF INSET IN FLOOR MOSAIC..

      I HAVE PUT A PICTURE IN THE POST BELOW--

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/09/qutab-minar-was-dhruv-stambh-vishnu.html

      KALASHA KUMBHAM IN THE MOST POTENT SYMBOL OF HINDUISM..

      JEW ROTHSCHILD TRIED TO DESTROY THIS SYMBOL FOR ASKING CHITPAVAN JEWS NAY BRAHMINS TO IMPALE IT WITH A STICK AND PUT IT OUTSIDE THE WINDOW LIKE A SCARECROW UPSIDE DOWN.. POORNAM ( FULLNESS ) WAS REDUCED TO SHOONYAM ( EMPTINESS )..

      MODI HAD TWEETED THIS PICTURE ON GUDI PADWA DAY--AND THIS GUJARATI FELLOW CLAIMS TO BE A HINDU.. BEFORE THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA, NOBODY HEARD OF GUDI PADWA .

      WHEN MODI WENT TO GURUVAYUR TEMPLE THEY ASKED HIM TO HOLD THE KALASHA KUMBHAM,  AS ATONEMENT

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/05/kalasha-symbol-of-cosmic-womb-capt-ajit.html

      THE KALASHA KUMBAM AS A LIVING VISUAL METAPHOR ( CORNUCOPIA ) GOES BEYOND RATIONAL LANGUAGE AND EXPRESSIONS.

      IT DEFINES PURNATATVA OR FULLNESS AND IS AN ELOQUENT REMINDER THAT ONLY FROM FULLNESS CAN FULLNESS ARISE.

      FROM INFINITY IS BORN INFINITY.
      WHEN INFINITY IS TAKEN OUT OF INFINITY, ONLY INFINITY IS LEFT OVER.
      OM, THE BRAHMAN IS INFINITE, WHOLE AND COMPLETE

      THE INVISIBLE BRAHMAN IS INFINITE; THE VISIBLE UNIVERSE IS ALSO INFINITE. FROM INFINITE BRAHMAN, INFINITE UNIVERSES COME OUT. THE INFINITE BRAHMAN STILL REMAINS INFINITE, EVEN THOUGH INFINITE UNIVERSES COME OUT OF IT.

      THIS 7000 YEAR OLD VERSE FROM VEDAS IS THE MOST PROFOUND VERSE EVER WRITTEN OR WILL BE WRITTEN BY MAN- IT IS PREGNANT WITH PROFOUND TRUTHS. IT CONTAINS THE WHOLE SECRET OF THE MYSTIC APPROACH TOWARDS LIFE.

      THIS VERSE OF THE UPANISHAD PILES UP INFINITIES OVER INFINITIES , AND WE ARRIVE AT THE BEWILDERING CONCLUSION THAT AFTER SUBTRACTING THE WHOLE FROM THE WHOLE, THE WHOLE ALONE REMAINS. THE IMPLIED MEANING HERE IS THE CHANGELESS AND INDIVISIBLE CHARACTER OF THE INFINITE REALITY, IN SPITE OF FORMS APPEARING TO BE CREATED WITHIN IT. THE INFINITE IS NON-DUAL AND THERE CAN BE NO DEALINGS WITH IT.
      https://youtu.be/0Pn5oo24THM


      Capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
    BELOW: THIS IS WHO WE ARE ... 

    WE BELONG TO THE MOST ANCIENT AND PRICELESS CULTURE..  

    NURTURE IT..  



    1. https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/05/kalasha-symbol-of-cosmic-womb-capt-ajit.html

      SOMEBODY ASKED ME

      WHY IS THERE AN ARABIC INSCRIPTION ON THE TOPMOST COPPER SPIRE ON TAJ MAHAL.( TEJO MAHALAYA )

      LISTEN ORIGINALLY THE SPIRE WAS GOLD INFUSED WTH IRRIDIUM IN THE SHAPE OF A 3D KALASHA KUMBHAM ..

      EVERY ANCIENT HINDU TEMPLE HAD A TOP SPIRE OF COPPER INFUSED WITH IRIDIUM..

      BASTARD JEW ROTHSCHILD HELD A CHAMPAGNE PARTY IN 1857 FOR HIS TOP OFFICERS ( BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY ) AT THE RED FORT AFTER HE TOOK OVER INDIA AS RULER .

      AT THIS PARTY THE ORIGINAL TAJ MAHAL SPIRES WERE SHOWCASED AND ALL PARTY REVELLERS WERE ALLOWED TO TOUCH IT.. THESE SPIRES EXISTED BEFORE MAHABHARATA WAR..

      AFTER THE PARTY, ROTHSCHILD MELTED THE GOLDEN SPIRES AND CARTED IT AWAY TO GERMANY. HE DID NOT KNOW THERE WAS IRIDIUM INFUSED ..

      GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD HAD ALREADY DESIGNED A DUPLICATE REPLICA WITH BRASS TO BE INSERTED IN PLACE.

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/02/murky-truths-of-sepoys-mutiny-1857.html

      NOW WHAT IS KALASHA KUMBHAM?

      VEDAS WERE DOWNLOADED 400 CENTURIES AGO BY SAGES OF THE DANAVA CIVILIZATION ( KERALA ARYAN NAMBOODIRIS ) AND PENNED DOWN 70 CENTURIES AGO ON THE BANKS OF THE SARASWATI RIVER VEDIC CIVILIZATION…

      SARASWATI RIVER WOULD DRY IN ANOTHER 1000 YEARS ( 4000 BC ) , WITH DURYODHANA AND BHIMA FIGHTING THE LAST BATTLE OF MAHABHARATA WAR IN A STAGNANT POOL, WITH KRISHNA AND BALARAMA WATCHING..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/11/mahabharata-and-bhagawat-gita-4000-bc.html

      BALARAMA WATCHED WITH HIS GIANT PLOUGH , WITH WHICH HE TRIED TO KILL BHIMA IN ANGER ( WHEN BHIMA HIS FINAL BLOW HIT DURYODHANA BELOW THE BELT AGAINST THE RULES OF WAR AND BROKE HIS PELVIS ) , AND KRISHNA GENTLY STOPPED HIM.

      THIS PLOUGH ( LEVERAGE ) WAS USED TO DIVERT THE BLOCKED SARASWATI RIVER TO THE GANGES.. THE MOUTH OF PERENNIAL SARASWATI RIVER WAS BLOCKED BY A GIANT TECTONIC SHIFT..

      VEDAS SRUITIS WERE CONVEYED ON ORAL ROUTE FROM 40,000 BC TO 5000 BC- BEFORE IT WAS PENNED DOWN..

      VEDAS WOULD BE RECITED BY THE GURU KERALA NAMBOODIRI AN HIS STUDENTS WOULD RECITE IT IN FRONT OF THE KALASHA KUMBAHAM…

      AFTER THE SESSION THE COCONUT WOULD BE BUST WITH INTENTION AND THE LIVING RIVER WATER ( PAMPA/ GANGES ) IN THE KUMBHAM WOULD BE CONSUMED BY THE STUDENTS AND RUBBED ON THEIR MURDHAVE HEAD.

      THE MANGO LEAVES ( TOP END DIPPING INTO THE WATER , HELD IN PLACE BY THE COCONUT ) ACTED AS A SCALAR ANTENNA.. WATER HOLDS MEMORY..

      FUTURE QUANTUM COMPUTERS WILL HAVE LIVING GANGES WATER FOR MEMORY, INSTEAD OF SILICON

      THIS WAS A SECRET I WANTED TO TELL IN THE 98% REVELATIONS SEGMENT.. HERE I HAVE TOLD IT NOW TODAY..

      MY REVELATIONS NOW RISE TO 60.17%

      NO GRIHA PRAVESH TAKES PLACE WITHOUT KALASHA KUMBHAM FIRST ENTERING THE NEW HOME.. THE LIVING RIVER WATER ( PAMPA/ GANGES ) INSIDE THE KUMBHAM IS SIPPED BY ALL AND THE REST SPRINKLED IN ALL ROOMS AFTER MILK BOILING CEREMONY..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/11/griha-pravesh-house-warming-ceremony.html

      WE HAVE A CULTURE.. NURTURE IT..

      DON’T LET THE ATHEIST COMMUNISM OF KARL MARX DESTROY OUR CULTURE..

      Capt ajit vadakayil
      ..





































    TO BE CONTINUED--




    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    We the people are done with ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY, form military courts to HANG JEWISH DEEP STATE PAYROLL JUDGES who bleed Bharatmata - Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0



    JUDGES CANNOT ORDER PM TO RESTORE INTERNET IN AREAS OF KASHMIR WHERE PAKISTANI ISI IS DOING TERRORIST ACTS AND TRAITORS ARE DOING ACT OF SEDITION..

    WE DON’T WANT ANOTHER “ FLUID LIKE WATER AND LEADERLESS ” HONG KONG STYLE INTERNET POWERED PROTEST, USED BY JEWS TO SAVE TRAITOR JEWISH MONEY LAUNDERERS FROM BEING EXTRADITED TO CHINA.. 

    PROTESTERS COMMONLY USED LIHKG, ( LIKE REDDIT ) AN ONLINE FORUM, AN OPTIONALLY END-TO-END ENCRYPTED MESSAGING SERVICE, TO COMMUNICATE AND BRAINSTORM IDEAS FOR PROTESTS AND MAKE COLLECTIVE DECISIONS ..

    THE KOSHER WEBSITE IS WELL-KNOWN FOR BEING THE ULTIMATE PLATFORM FOR DISCUSSING THE STRATEGIES FOR THE LEADERLESS ANTI-EXTRADITION BILL PROTESTS ..

    THE NAXAL RED CORRIDOR HAS BEEN CREATED BY JUDGE IN DEEP STATE PAYROLL , WITH BENAMI MEDIA COVERT HELP..  KASHMIRI PANDITS WERE ETHNICALLY CLEANSED WITH ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY SUPPORT. 

    OUR CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW JUDGES TO INTERFERE WITH BHARATMATAs INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SECURITY..

    MILITARY COURTS MUST BE FORMED TO HANG JUDGES WHO ARE IN THE PAYROLL OF JEWISH DEEP STATE..

    TO START OFF IMPRISON THE JUDGES AND CJI WHO SAT ON THE BENCH WHICH STRUCK DOWN NJAC..

    THE NJAC WOULD HAVE REPLACED THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM SYSTEM FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES.

    THE NJAC BILL WAS PASSED UNANIMOUSLY BY BOTH LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA WITH PRESIDENT SIGNING THE LAW.. YET ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY USED A JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCESS AND STRUCK IT DOWN..

    NJAC ACT AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ACT IS IN FORCE FROM 13 APRIL 2015 AND IS STILL IN FORCE..

    THE JUDICIAL REVIEW STRIKING DOWN NJAC IS NULL AND VOID..JUDICIARY HAS NO SUCH POWERS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW..

    JUSTICES J. S. KHEHAR, MADAN LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HAD DECLARED THE 99TH AMENDMENT AND NJAC ACT UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY A ILLEGAL JUDICIAL REVIEW .. THESE FOUR JUDGES AND EX-CJI CL DATTU MUST BE TRIED BY THE MILITARY COURT FOR SEDITION…

    JUDICIAL REVIEW UNCONSTITUTIONALLY  EMPOWERS THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO DECIDE THE FATE OF LAWS PASSED BY THE ELECTED AND ACCOUNTABLE LEGISLATURE WHICH REPRESENTS THE SOVEREIGN WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

    THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR “JUDICIAL REVIEW “ IN THE CONSTITUTION.. THESE WORDS JUST DON’T EXIST ..

    THE SUPREME COURT IS ITSELF BOUND BY THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND THE PARLIAMENT CAN AMEND THE CONSTITUTION ANY TIME THEY WANT..

    OUR CONSTITUTION IS NOT ETCHED ON ROCK, IT IS A DYNAMIC DOCUMENT TO BE AMENDED BY LAW MAKERS OF PARLIAMENT..

    INSTEAD WE HAVE JUDGES QUOTING SECTION 14 , AND CREATING OWN LAWS.. THESE STUPID JUDGES HAVE BEEN DOING IT SINCE INDEPENDENCE..

    SECTION 141 IS BEING USED BY DEEP STATE DARLING JUDGE MADAN LOKUR ( WHO IS NOW JUDGE IN FIJI ) TO SAY ON NDTV THAT INDIA MUST TAKE IN ILLEGAL MUSLIM ROHINGYA REFUGEES..

    SORRY, INDIAN CONSTITUTION APPLIES ONLY TO LAW ABIDING INDIAN CITIZENS ..

    IMAGINE STUPID SUPREME COURT HAS EVEN STARTED APPLYING CONSTITUTION TO ANIMALS..THE WHOLE WORLD IS RIDICULING INDIA..


    HERE IS SECTION 141 --

    141. Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts The law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India…

    HEY STUPID JUDGES, SECTION 141 DOES NOT APPLY TO NATION OF INDIA --  BUT ONLY TO LOWER COURTS..

    STUPID JUDGES CANNOT MAKE LAWS FOR INDIA , THEY CAN ONLY INTERPRET LAWS AND THAT TOO ONLY WHEN SOLICITED.. JUDGES CANNOT PLAY GOD..

    STUPID FELLOW CJI DIPAK MISRA CONTENDED " SUPREME COURT IS SUPREME"..

    THIS IS WORSE THAN THE SHIPs CHIEF COOK WILL DECLARE  " I AM CHIEF OF THE SHIP, I WONT ALLOW CAPTAIN TO LOAD SULFURIC ACID IN HOUSTON "..

    DIPAK MISRA WILL TAKE A FLIGHT TO THE CAPITAL OF INDIA, IF A FORM IS GIVEN TO HIM WHICH STATES “FILL UP IN CAPITAL” ( UPPER CASE )..TEE HEEE.

    DOES JEW DARLING LAW MINISTER PRASAD AND ATTORNEY GENERAL KNOW THEIR OWN POWERS?

    IN THE NAME OF SOCIAL SCIENCES -- ABSOLUTE LIES ARE BEING TAUGHT TO STUDENTS IN JNU/ JU/ DU/ TISS / IITs ..JEW DARLING PRAKASH JAVEDEKAR IS ALLOWING THIS.

    WE WARN DEEP STATE AGENTS LIKE PRANAB MUKHERJEE- SHOVE YOUR "CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOTISM"..

    WE WILL HAVE PATRIOTISM TO THE WATAN, NOT TO SOME BULLSHIT CONSTITUTION , WHICH HAS A VERY LONG ROTHSCHILD CONTROLLED LANGOT CALLED STARE DECISIS..

    STUPID PAST JUDGMENTS ( SANS CONTEXT / SANS DHARMA , IN A ILLEGAL JUSTICE IS BLIND SYSTEM ) ARE BEING USED AS AN ADDENDUM TO THE CONSTITUTION VIA STARE DECISIS..

    CONSTITUTION IS NOT SOME CYBER CODE TO CRACK.

    ALL IT MEANS IT THE JUDICIARY MUST BE ABLE TO DO BODMAS , AND APPLY SUITABLE LAWS TO A CASE ..

    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL DECLARED , NOT ONE SINGLE JUDGE HAS BEEN ABLE TO FIND OUT WHICH LAW TAKES PREPONDERANCE, SINCE INDEPENDENCE ..

    AND NOW CJI BOBDE WANTS TO INTRODUCE BLACK BOX AI ALGORITHMS TO FOOL BHARATMATA?..

    LAWYERS ARE THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL -- AND THEN THE DISCARDS OF THE LOSER LAWYER POOL..

    AND WE TREAT THESE JUDGES LIKE GOD?.. AND THEY THEN PLAY GOD, BECAUSE THEY HAVE "POWER OF TAKING LIFE" ??

    THE UNACCOUNTABLE , UN-ELECTED , COLLEGIUM JUDGES HAVE NO POWERS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION , TO STRIKE DOWN SEC 497 ( ADULTERY LAW ) AND SEC 377 ( HOMOSEXUALITY LAW ) .  

    WHO SAYS A TRAITOR OR MURDERER OR CRIMINAL OR SEXUAL PREDATOR JUDGE CANNOT BE INVESTIGATED?..

    FOREIGN FORCES ARE CREATING LAWS IN INDIA VIA PIL ROUTE...  A NGO FUNDED BY PAKISTANI ISI CAN FILE A PIL AND CREATE AN INSTANT LAW IN INDIA..

    PAKISTANI ISI BACKED NGOs JAILED HOME MINISTER AMIT SHAH TO SAVE THE LEGACY OF DREADED TERRORISTS SOHRABUDDIN..

    EVERYBODY KNEW THAT THE DEEP STATE DARLING JUDGE PAPA CHANDRACHUD WOULD BE CJI..

    EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT BETA "LIBERAL" CHANDRACHUD WILL BE FUTURE CJI OF INDIA..   HE KICKED BHARATMATA INTO THE ADULTERY / HOMOSEXUAL MANDI, WE ALL KNOW THAT..

    WHY ARE THINGS SO PREDICABLE IN INDIA?...

    PARAMOUNT CLAUSE : WE THE PEOPLE ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION.. THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE USED AS A FRANKENSTEIN TO STRAIT-JACKET  "WE THE PEOPLE"  BY STUPID JUDICIARY ..

    INDIA IS NOT A DEMOCRACY.. INDIA IS A BANANA REPUBLIC CONTROLLED BY DEEP STATE WHITE JEWS FROM ABROAD….

    COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA ARE IN CAHOOTS..

    'THE JUDICIAL BRANCH HAS EFFECTIVELY BECOME THE EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCH IN INDIA TODAY .. THE WORLD MEDIA MONOPOLIZED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD IS IN CAHOOTS..

    YOU CANNOT BURST CRACKERS FOR A FEW HOURS ON DIWALI NIGHT WHICH COMES A SINGLE DAY IN A YEAR..   BUT YOU SHALL BE WOKEN BY UP DEAFENING AZAN CALLS FROM MOSQUES DAILY AT 0430 AM WHEN YOU ARE IN DEEP REM SLEEP…

    ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS IN CONTEMPT OF THE CONSTITUTION AS THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW JUDGES TO ELECT JUDGES.. .

    JUDGES ARE IN CONTEMPT OF "WE THE PEOPLE" WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION.. 

    JUDGES ARE IN CONTEMPT OF DHARMA ( SUBJECTIVE NATURAL JUSTICE )

    JUDGES ARE IN CONTEMPT OF THE WATAN..  WE WONT ALLOW CONSTITUTION TO BE USED LIKE KORAN OR MAO RED BOOK IN THE NAME OF A RIDICULOUS "CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOTISM"..

    WHY IS PRESIDENT, PM AND COAS OF ARMED FORCES TAKING A STUPID OATH TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION ( COMPILED BY COMMIE JEW JOHN DEWEY FOR BR AMBEDKAR ?..

    WE WANT THEM TO SWEAR AN OATH TO PROTECT THE WATAN, NOT THE CONSTITUTION --LIKE ISRAEL.. LOYALTY TO THE WATAN STINKS OF “BRAHMINICAL PATRIARCHY “ FOR THE JEWISH DEEP STATE , RIGHT?..

    MELORDS USE THE CONSTITUTION TO PROTECT SEDITIOUS TERRORISTS HOLDING FOREIGN GUNS .. THEY GET INSTANT BAIL.. HONEST CITIZENS LANGUISH IN JAIL FOR DECADES..

    YOU CANNOT BURST CRACKERS FOR A FEW HOURS ON DIWALI NIGHT WHICH COMES A SINGLE DAY IN A YEAR..    BUT YOU SHALL BE WOKEN BY UP DEAFENING AZAN CALLS FROM MOSQUES DAILY AT 0430 AM WHEN YOU ARE IN DEEP REM SLEEP…

    SABARIMALA PILGRIMS WHO TRIED TO PROTECT THEIR FAITH AND ANCIENT CULTURE BY CHANTING BHAJANS ARE THE NEW BAAAAD TERRORISTS. .

    THE LARGEST PILGRIMAGE OF THE PLANET SABARIMALA AND GREAT SANATANA DHARMA IS BEING BROUGHT DOWN TO THE LOWER LEVEL OF WEE FOREIGN INVADER RELIGIONS LIKE PARSI/ BOHRA TEMPLES..

    SABARIMALA IS THE PLANETs NO 1 PILGRIMAGE AND KUMBH MELA A DISTANT SECOND . .

    MALE PILGRIMS GO THERE TO LOSE THEIR VICES AND PHOBIAS . . WOMEN AFTER MENOPAUSE GO THERE TO GET RID OF THEIR PMS PAINS ..

    JEWISH COMMIES KNOW THAT ATHEISM IS GOING FOR A TOSS IN KERALA.

    SABARIMALA IS THE PLANETs NO 1 PILGRIMAGE AND KUMBH MELA A DISTANT SECOND . .

    MALE PILGRIMS GO THERE TO LOSE THEIR VICES AND PHOBIAS . . WOMEN AFTER MENOPAUSE GO THERE TO GET RID OF THEIR PMS PAINS ..

    DRUNKARDS AND WIFE BEATERS GO TO SABARIMALA AND GET CURED . .

    TO LOSE A VICE YOU HAVE TO ABSTAIN FOR 21 DAYS --BODY IS LIKE A RIVER -- ALMOST ALL BODY CELLS GET RENEWED . .

    SABARIMALA OFFERS DOUBLE THE TIME AS THE VRAT IS 42 DAYS . ..

    PILGRIMS UNDERTAKE A VOW ( VRAT ) AND THERE IS NO SEX DURING THIS PERIOD AND THIS INCLUDES MASTURBATION . . . ON THE LAST DAY A PILGRIM CANNOT HAVE A YOUNG WOMAN STANDING IN FRONT OF HIM IN A CRUSH AND DISTRACT HIM . .

    FOREIGN FORCES JEALOUS OF SABARIMALA AND WANT TO SABOTAGE THE PLANETs NO 1 PILGRIMAGE USING COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY, TROJAN HORSE NGOs AND BENAMI MEDIA . . .

    THE MAGIC OF SABARIMALA LIES IN 3 FLASHES , THE PURE AWARENESS BETWEEN THE TEN SECOND PERIOD SECOND AND THIRD FLASHES . . .

    PAKISTANI ISI PAYROLL KASHMIRIS WHO PELT STONES AND LOB GRENADES ON OUR JAWANS ARE DARLINGS OF THE MELORDS ..

    ILLEGAL ROHINGYA MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS AND BANGLADESIS NOW SEEK SHARIA LAW IN NORTH KERALA.. EVERY CONSTRUCTION SITE TEEMS WITH THESE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WITH VOTER CARDS..

    KASHMIRI AND NAXAL STUDENTS WHO PUT FACEBOOK POSTS OF BREAKING UP INDIA INTO PIECES ARE THE DARLINGS OF THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY.. THE DESH BHAKT STUDENTS WHO RESISTED IT ARE AGAINST “FREE SPEECH “..

    THESE JUDGES WHO ALLOWED BHARATMATA TO BE BLED, WILL SOON GET HUMAN RIGHTS KOSHER AWARDS WITH HUGE CASH ATTACHED ..

    5 JUDGES DECIDED THAT 1300 MILLION INDIANS CAN DO ADULTERY.. IF THERE IS A NATION WIDE REFERENDUM ADULTERY WILL BE REJECTED BY 99.99 % PEOPLE, AS IT IS AGAINST OUR CULTURE..

    SO WHEN MY NEIGHBOR IS IN OFFICE I CAN GO AND SCREW HIS WIFE?..  EVEN LIBERAL SCANDINAVIA DOES NOT ALLOW THIS..  EVEN "LIVE IN COUPLES" DOES NOT ALLOW THIS..

    WHEN A KASHMIRI TERRORIST BOMBS OUR JAWANS WITH PAKISTANI ISI PROVIDED RDX, THE FIRST QUESTION ASKED BY JUDGES IS WHY THE ISLAMIC TERRORIST WAS DRIVEN TO THIS EXTENT..  BAAAD HINDUS , BAAAD HINDUTVA …

    COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY , BENAMI MEDIA AND FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs ARE ALWAYS ON THE SAME PAGE..

    TV ANCHORS OF BENAMI MEDIA ALLOW FOUL LIES IN THE NAME OF DEBATES.. THE TV ANCHOR MUST BE JAILED IF HE ALLOWS THIS..

    OUR WHOLESOME VALUES SUSTAINED FOR MILLENNIUMS ARE NOW UGLY PREJUDICES..   WE THE GOOD CHILDREN OF BHARATMATA ARE NOW THE PROBLEM..

    “ INDIA IS THE ONLY MAJOR CIVILIZATIONAL COUNTRY WHERE YOU ARE SYSTEMATICALLY TAUGHT TO HATE YOUR HERITAGE AND GLORIFY THE INVADERS WHO CAME TO DESTROY IT.  AND THIS ABSURDITY IS CALLED ‘SECULARISM’ – TAREK FATAH”

    BHARATMATA IS RACING TO BE THIS PLANETs NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 14 YEARS, AFTER 800 YEARS OF SLAVERY..   BEFORE THAT JUDASES WHO SELL THEIR OWN WATAN FOR A PIECE OF FOREIGN SILVER WANT TO BRING HER DOWN..

    DESH BHAKT CITIZENS ENGAGE IN HATE SPEECH AS PER JUDICIARY AND MEDIA IN FOREIGN PAYROLL .   BUT HEY , NAXALS AND FOREIGN PAYROLL TRAITORS ENGAGE IN FREE SPEECH.   YOU ARE A FASCIST CRIMINAL FOR LOVING YOU OWN WATAN..

    TRUTH SPOKEN BY DESH BHAKT CITIZENS WHICH HURTS FEELINGS OF DESH DROHIS ARE INADMISSIBLE IN COURT..

    TWITTER/ FACEBOOK/ GOOGLE / QUORA/ WHATSUP , ASSISTED BY BENAMI INDIAN MEDIA ARE THE PROTECTORS OF THE “PROGRESSIVE UTOPIA “ BUS DRIVEN BY THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ..  THE WORD “VADAKAYIL “ IS BANNED BY TWITTER / FACEBOOK/ QUORA/ YOUTUBE ..

    THE TEAM HEADED BY BR AMBEDKAR WHO COMPILED OUR CONSTITUTION, DID NOT HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL - NAY- PERCEPION-- TO APPLY BODMAS .... THIS HAS RESULTED IN EVEN FOREIGN FORCES USING TROJAN HORSE NGOs ( VIA PIL ) TO HIJACK OUR CONSTITUTION.

    THE PREPONDERANCE OF LAWS IN THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE CLEARLY LAID OUT IN A CRYSTAL "BODMAS " STYLE..... 1 5 x 6 - 3 (4 - 2)... ... what part should you calculate first?..... Calculate them in the wrong order, and you will get a wrong answer !... This is where BODMAS kicks in !...... OUR UNSUCCESSFUL LAWYERS TURNED COLLEGIUM JUDGES DONT HAVE THE BRAINS TO PRIORITIZE........ B- Brackets first.... O- Orders (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)..... DM- Division and Multiplication (left-to-right)..... AS- Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)... NOT ONE SINGLE JUDGE KNOWS HOW TO APPLY BODMAS TO THE CONSTITUTION , TO DECIDE WHICH LAW TAKES PREPONDERANCE…

    WE ARE DONE WITH THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL BECOMING LAWYERS AND THEN BOTTOM DREGS OF THE LOSER LAWYER POOL BECOMING MELORD JUDGES, WHO ARE SO SQUEAMISH ( OUT OF INFERIORITY COMPLEX ) THAT THEY WILL SEND YOU TO JAIL FOR "CONTEMPT OF COURT " AT THE DROP OF A HAT.

    JUDICIARY HAD PULLED UP MODI OVER DEMONITISATION …… JUST WHO THE HELL ARE THESE LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES ?  TODAY JUNGLE NAXALISM HAS METAMORPHOSED TO URBAN NAXALISM..BECAUSE HUNDREDS OF SINTEX TANKS CONTAINING CURRENCY NOTES BURIED DEEP IN JUNGLES ARE ALL USELESS ..

    COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY BE WARNED…….. WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO GIVE ORDERS TO THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE AND PLAY GOD…  WHY DO YOU GIVE PILs FILED BY PAKISTANI ISI FUNDED NGOs TOP PRIORITY?..

    WE THE PEOPLE DONT EVEN WANT ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES TO GIVE THEIR STUPID UNSOLICITED OPINIONS..

    PEOPLE LIKE JEW NOAM CHOMSKY GIVE FIATS TO COLLEGIUM MELORDS ….. . BEFORE 1947 ALMOST ALL OUR JUDGES WERE IN THE PAYROLL OF JEW ROTHSCHILD . . .

    WE KNOW COLLEGIUM JUDGES HAVE FOREIGN SUPPORT WHEN THEIR LEGISLATE AND DO EXTREME JUDICIAL OVERREACH . .

    WHY IS FOREIGN MEDIA OF JEW ROTHSCHILD INTERESTED IN INDIAs INTERNAL AFFAIRS ?..... WHEN DID YOU LAST SEE THE BENAMI MEDIA/ COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY/ NEW WORLD ORDER CONTROLLED RAJYA SABHA SUPPORTING THE WATAN ?....

    JUDICIARY BURNT MIDNIGHT OIL TO OPEN CHAMIYA BAR WHOREHOUSES IN MUMBAI… AS IF A FEW DOZENS ATTRACTIVE GIRLS WITH GOOD FIGURE CANNOT GET A DECENT JOB..THEY HAVE NOT CARED FOR FAMILY BREADWINNER UNDER TRIALS INCARCERATED FOR TWO DECADES ROTTING AWAY THEIR YOUTH IN JAIL .

    PRESIDENT OR INDIA AND STATE GOVERNORS ARE NOT RUBBER STAMPS AS CONTENDED BY JUDGES OF THEIR LACKEY MEDIA.. THEY HAVE BEEN VESTED WITH ENORMOUS SUBJECTIVE POWERS INCLUDING VETO POWERS BY THE CONSTITUTION.. SUBJECTIVE SUSTAINS DHARMA.. OBJECTIVE SUSTAINS ONLY BLIND LOGIC..

    SUBJECTIVE MUST HOLD THE "VETO POWER"..  VETO POWER CAN NEVER BE GIVEN TO THE OBJECTIVE….  THIS IS WHY THE PRESIDENT IS THE SUPREME COMMANDER OF OUR ARMED FORCES

    DESH BHAKTI AND DHARMA IS A SUBJECTIVE FEELING..    IT CAN CAUSE BLOOD TO BOIL AND CAUSE YOU TO SACRIFICE YOUR LIFE....ABOVE THE OBJECTIVE CONSTITUTION LIES ,  THE SUBJECTIVE FEELINGS TO OUR WATAN  AND DHARMA ( NATURAL JUSTICE )…

    KHAPS WHO DELIVER SUBJECTIVE JUSTICE ARE BETTER THAN OUR USELESS INDIAN JUDICIARY--WHERE A FEW WISE OLD MEN ( WHO KNOW ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE VILLAGE SINCE THEY WERE BORN ) DELIVER SUBJECTIVE CONSCIOUS JUSTICE -- SWIFT / WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF CONTEXT/ WISE TO THE WAYS OF LOCAL CULTURE / LADEN WITH DHARMA...

    SERIAL KILLER JEW TED KACZYNSKI USED TO PLANET DNA BY GOING TO PUBLIC TOILETS AND LIFTING HAIR AND SPIT .. SEMEN FROM USED CONDOMS IN GARBAGE BINS CAN BE INSERTED INTO VAGINAS TO FUDGE DNA TESTS ..

    RICH LAWYER RK ANAND USED TO HAVE HIS OWN " DIRECT WITNESSES" SHACKED UP IN HIS SAFE HOUSES.

    NOT A SINGLE JUDGE HAS THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO GLEAN AND APPLY CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE..WE NEED A SYSTEM WHERE INTELLIGENT JUDGES ( WHO HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO GLEAN CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE) ARE SELECTED BY A NATION WIDE ENTRANCE EXAM LIKE IIT...

    COLLEGIUM JUDGES RUSH TO SAY -- LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE LETHARGY HAS ACTUALLY FORCED US TO STEP IN AND FILL UP THE VOID . ..

    HEY, MELORDS WHAT ABOUT YOUR OWN BACKLOG OF CASES ? ..

    WE ASK THE LEGISLATURE TO CREATE AN IMMEDIATE LAW WHICH RESTRICTS THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHICH CAN BE AFFECTED BY A PIL RULING BY JUDGES …

    DEFINITELY OUR CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF 1300 MILLION PEOPLE TO COME UNDER PIL…SO THAT JUDGES CAN ACT GOD -- AND THAT TOO TO KEEP DESH DROHI FOREIGN FORCES ( example: HOMOSEXUALITY— ANIMAL LUST CONVERTED BY MAGIC TO LOVE ) HAPPY..

    CULTURE IS EVERYTHING ! WE ARE DONE WITH ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES SUPERIMPOSING THE TEMPLATE OF THE OBJECTIVE CONSTITUTION ON SUBJECTIVE ANCIENT CULTURE ….WE DONT WANT MEN DOING ANAL SEX IN INDIA..

    TAKING DECISIONS WHICH AFFECT THE FORTUNES OF THE ENTIRE NATION IS THE SOLE PREROGATIVE OF THE ELECTED LAW MAKERS..WHO ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE AND THE WATAN…. THIS IS THE MEANING OF DEMOCRACY..

    THE WHOLE OF INDIA WAS MORTIFIED WHEN DEEP STATE CONTROLLED MELORDS ORDERED THE PM OF INDIA TO INTERLINK ALL RIVERS WITHIN A DEAD LINE-- AND KILL BHARATMATA..

    WE EXPECT OUR LEGISLATURE TO DELIVER SUBJECTIVE DHARMA… NOT OBJECTIVE “ BLIND JUSTICE “ OF COURTS WHICH TRAMPLES ON OUR PRICELESS CULTURE …

    WE WANT IMMEDIATE POLICE REFORMS ..

    WE DONT WANT TO SEE DGP OF POLICE DANCING TO THE TUNE OF THE STATE CM..
    THE DGP HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE NATURAL JUSTICE ( DHARMA ) WHEN THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE / JUDICIARY GOES ROGUE .. DGP OF STATE MUST KNOW THAT WE THE PEOPLE ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION...HE IS TRUSTED TO PROTECT BHARATMATA AND HER CHILDREN..'

    JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO RULED INDIA WANTED ONLY OBJECTIVE JUSTICE AS HE WAS RULING OVER SLAVES..

    LIKE I SAID-- WHEN A SHIP IS VETTED BY AN OIL MAJOR , THERE WILL BE 999 OBJECTIVE QUESTIONS.. THE SHIP CAN PASS ALL THE 999 "OBJECTIVE" QUESTIONS..

    THE FINAL "SUBJECTIVE" QUESTION TO THE VETTING INSPECTOR WILL BE " ARE YOU WILLING TO SAIL ON THIS SHIP WITHOUT RESERVATION FOR A VOYAGE NUDER THE PRESENT CAPTAIN AND CREW"..

    IS THIS ANSWER IS NEGATIVE , THE SHIP HAS FAILED..

    BUT HEY HEY HEY--- WHEN IT COMES TO SAVING DESH DROHI/ NAXALS/ TERRORISTS, THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY DOES A 180 DEG U TURN AND GOES TO THE "SUBJECTIVE MODE WITH EYES WIDE OPEN , WITHIN CONTEXT "..

    N RAM STOLE "CLASSIFIED MILITARY SECRETS " TO SCREW PM MODI OVER THE RAFALE DEAL..

    AT COURT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TOLD CJI GOGOI THAT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY COMMIE N RAM IS A STOLEN MILITARY SECRET -- AND IS A CRIME WHICH ENTAILS 14 YEARS OF JAIL..

    BUT HEY WHAT DOES CJI GOGOI AND JUSTICE KM JOSEPH TELL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ? THEY WONT CONSIDER THAT THE DOCUMENT WAS STOLEN.. THEY WILL CHECK IF THE DOCUMENT HOLDS WATER..

    WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THIS ?

    WE ASK PM MODI - ARE YOU A BABE IN THE FUCKIN' WOODS ?..

    WE ASK THE JUDICIARY NOT TO DESTROY INDIA.. BE LOYAL TO THE WATAN..

    PRASAD DID NOTHING IN HIS FIRST TENURE-- ALL HE DID WAS TO GIVE MODI AN EGO MASSAGE..

    ALL MODIs MINISTERS EXCEPT A COUPLE OF THEM ARE INCOMPETENT SYCOPHANTS.. MODI COMES IN AND HIS DOGS FOLLOW..



    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/we-people-are-done-with-illegal.html

    I ASK MY READERS - SPREAD THIS BY WHATS APP AND EVERY OTHER MEANS..

    FOREIGN PAYROLL JUDGES AND THEIR LACKEY MEDIA ARE STRIKING AT BHARATMATAs HEAD NOW..


    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..








    BELOW:  IN BHAGAWAD GITA, 6000 YEARA GO,  VISHNU AVATAR KRISHNA TAKES HIS "VIRAAT ROOP" TO CONVINCE ARJUNA TO FIGHT AND SUSTAIN DHARMA.. 





    MAHARISHIS HAD 12 STRAND DNA..  

    VISHNU AVATARS HAD 13 STRAND DNA AND MORE.. 

    THEY COULD CREATE THEIR OWN GIANT HOLOGRAMS 



    THE BENT PYRAMID MADE 12,000 YEARS AGO BY CALICUT KING KALANEMI, COULD DISPLAY A GIANT HOLOGRAM

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/secrets-of-bent-pyramid-at-dahsur-egypt_28.html







    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..



    The FATHER OF OUR NATION is Chanakya , not Gandhi - our NATIONAL POET is Adi Shankaracharya , not Tagore -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0



    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH !

    1. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/judge-quotes-rabindranath-tagore-during-bhim-army-chief-chandrashekhar-azads-bail-hearing-2164686

      THE FEMALE JUDGE KAMINI LAU QUOTED ROTHSCHILDS AGENT DESH DROHI PIR ALI MUSLIM RABINDRANATH TAGORE IN HER COURT ORDER GIVING BAIL TO URBAN NAXAL CHANDRASHEKHAR AZAD..

      Where the world has not been broken up
      into fragments by narrow domestic walls;


      THE ABOVE VERSE IN GITANJALI WAS WRITTEN BY YB YEATS AND REVERSE TRANSLATED TO BENGALI..

      THIS IDEA OF ROTHSCHILD-- SEAMLESS BOUNDARIES WAS USED IN CREATING
      EU..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/12/nobel-prize-and-knighthood-for-tagore.html

      TAGOREs GRANDFATHER WAS A DRUG RUNNER AND THE OWNER OF THIS PLANETs GREATEST WHOREHOUSE ( SONAGACHI CALCUTTA ) , CATERING TO WHITE HOMOSEXUAL PEDOPHILES..
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/08/opium-drug-running-tagore-family-capt.html

      ROTHSCHILD GAVE BOTH YB YEATS AND TAGORE THE NOBEL PRIZE..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_12.html

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/we-people-are-done-with-illegal.html


      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..




    FROM TODAY ONWARDS –

    THE FATHER OF OUR NATION IS CHANAKYA ( NOT ROTHSCHILDs AGENT KATIAWARI JEW GANDHI )


    OUR NATIONAL POET IS ADI SHANKARACHARYA ( NOT ROTHSCHAILDs AGENT PIR ALI MUSLIM RABINDRANATH TAGORE )



    DOES NOT MATTER HOW MUCH THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TRIES..  WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ACCEPT CRIMINAL DNA ROHINGYA MUSLIMS AND ILLEGAL BANGLADESI MUSLIMS  INTO INDIA.. 

    THESE DEEP STATE PAYROLL JUDGES CREATED THE NAXAL RED CORRIDOR IN INDIA WHERE 20% OF OUR LANDMASS IS CONTROLLED BY NAXALS


    THESE DEEP STATE PAYROLL  JUDGES ALLOWED ETHNIC CLEANSING OF KASHMIRI PANDITS 
















    OPPORTUNIST HINDUS CONVERTED TO ISLAM DURING MUGHAL RULE AND THEN RE-CONVERTED BACK WHEN THE MUGHAL EMPIRE DIED..  TAGORE FAMILY WAS ONE OF THOSE.




    AS SOON AS KERALA NAMBOODIRI PROFESSOR ARYAN CHANAKYA (  TAXILA UNIVERSITY) ,  HEARD FROM HIS TURKISH STUDENT THAT ALEXANDER HAD CROSSED THE BOSPORUS STRAITS WITH A HUGE ARMY ON HORSEBACK, HE KNEW THE DESTINATION WAS INDIA..   

    THE SAME HOUR CHANAKYA RESIGNED FROM HIS POST AND DID THE SPADEWORK TO DEFEND HIS WATAN.  

    WHEN THE MOST POWERFUL KING REFUSED HELP,  CHANAKYA WOULD TURN KINGMAKER AND CREATE HIS OWN KING.




    KERALA NAMBOODIRI ARYAN ADI SHANKARACHARYA DISTRIBUTED THE 4 VEDAS TO THE FOUR CORNERS OF INDIA 4000 YEARS AGO..

    THIS IS SPIT IN THE EYE OF TRAITOR INDIAN “ANGREZ KA AULAADs”  WHO SAY BRITISH UNITED INDIA..














    1. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE DECIDED,    --- THE FATHER OF OUR NATION IS CHANAKYA , NOT GANDHI - OUR NATIONAL POET IS ADI SHANKARACHARYA , NOT TAGORE..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-father-of-our-nation-is-chanakya.html

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

      1. PUT ABOVE COMMENT IS WEBSITES OF--
        JUDGE KAMINI LAU
        TRUMP
        PUTIN
        BORIS JOHNSON
        AMBASSADORS TO FROM USA/ RUSSIA/ UK..
        NHRC
        NCW
        NCM
        EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER/ MINISTRY INDIA
        PMO
        PM MODI
        NITI AYOG
        AMITABH KANT
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
        DGPs OF ALL STATES
        GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
        PRESIDENT OF INDIA
        VP OF INDIA
        SPEAKER LOK SABHA
        SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
        CJI BOBDE
        ATTORNEY GENERAL
        ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
        ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
        LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
        ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
        AJIT DOVAL
        RAW
        IB
        NIA
        ED
        CBI
        AMIT SHAH
        HOME MINISTRY
        DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        COAS
        ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
        I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        DAVID FRAWLEY
        STEPHEN KNAPP
        WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
        KONRAED ELST
        FRANCOIS GAUTIER
        RSS
        AVBP
        VHP
        MOHAN BHAGWAT
        RAM MADHAV
        THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
        SATYA NADELLA
        CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
        QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
        QUORA MODERATION TEAM
        KURT OF QUORA
        GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
        SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
        SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
        MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
        BABA RAMDEV
        CHETAN BHAGAT
        ENTIRE BBC GANG
        NALIN KOHLI
        GVL NARASIMHA RAO
        SAMBIT PATRA
        VIVEK OBEROI
        GAUTAM GAMBHIR
        ASHOK PANDIT
        ANUPAM KHER
        KANGANA RANAUT
        VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
        KIRON KHER
        MEENAKSHI LEKHI
        SMRITI IRANI
        PRASOON JOSHI
        MADHUR BHANDARKAR
        SWAPAN DASGUPTA
        SONAL MANSINGH
        MADHU KISHWAR
        SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
        GEN GD BAKSHI
        RSN SINGH
        E SREEDHARAN
        MOHANLAL
        SURESH GOPI
        CHANDAN MITRA
        JAVED AKTHAR
        SHABANA AZMI
        KUNHALIKKUTTY
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        FAZAL GHAFOOR ( MES )
        RANA AYYUB
        SHEHLA RASHID
        AHMAD PATEL
        AMISH TRIPATHI
        DEVADUTT PATTANAIK
        PAVAN VARMA
        RAMACHANDRA GUHA
        MUKESH AMBANI
        RATA TATA
        ANAND MAHINDRA
        KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
        LAXMI NARAYAN MITTAL
        AZIM PREMJI
        KAANIYA MURTHY
        RAHUL BAJAJ
        RAJAN RAHEJA
        NAVEEN JINDAL
        GOPICHAND HINDUJA
        DILIP SHANGHVI
        GAUTAM ADANI
        THE QUINT
        THE SCROLL
        THE WIRE
        THE PRINT
        MK VENU
        MADHU TREHAN
        RAJDEEP SARDESAI
        PAAGALIKA GHOSE
        NAVIKA KUMAR
        ANAND NARASIMHAN
        SRINIVASAN JAIN
        SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
        VIKRAM CHANDRA
        NIDHI RAZDAN
        FAYE DSOUZA
        ZAKKA JACOB
        RAVISH KUMAR
        PRANNOY JAMES ROY
        AROON PURIE
        VINEET JAIN
        RAGHAV BAHL
        SEEMA CHISTI
        DILEEP PADGOANKAR
        VIR SANGHVI
        KARAN THAPAR
        PRITISH NANDI
        SHEKHAR GUPTA
        SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
        SONIA GANDHI
        RAHUL GANDHI
        PRIYANKA GANDHI
        AK ANTONY
        OOMMEN CHANDY
        PC GEORGE
        FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
        ANNA VETTICKAD
        FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA THOMAS ISAAC
        JOHN ABRAHAM
        NASIRUDDIN SHAH
        KUNHALIKUTTY
        MAMOOTTY
        DULQUER SALMAN
        ADMIRAL RAMDAS
        KAVITA RAMDAS
        LALITA RAMDAS
        JOHN DAYAL
        KANCHA ILAIH
        TEESTA SETALVAD
        JEAN DREZE
        ARUDHATI ROY
        SHOBHAA DE
        IRFAN HABIB
        NIVEDITA MENON
        AYESHA KIDWAI
        SWARA BHASKAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        KAVITA KRISHNAN
        PRAKASH KARAT
        BRINDA KARAT
        SITARAM YECHURY
        D RAJA
        ANNIE RAJA
        SUMEET CHOPRA
        DINESH VARSHNEY
        PINARAYI VIYAYAN
        KODIYERI BALAKRISHNAN
        DEANS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ TISS/ FTII/ NALANDA
        K SUBBHARAYAN
        BINOY VISWAM
        TK RANGARAJAN
        JOHN BRITTAS
        THOMAS ISAAC ( FINANCE MINISTER KERALA )
        KAMALAHASSAN
        ALL MPs OF INDIA
        ALL MLAs OF INDIA
        ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
        JULIO RIBEIRO
        WENDY DONIGER
        SHELDON POLLOCK
        AUDREY TRUSCHKE
        SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA




    1. MODI DOES NOT HAVE THE TENACITY AND WISDOM OF NEHRU WHEN IT COMES TO INFILTRATING TRAITOR ORGANISATIONS AND POLITICAL PARTIES..

      IT IS A PIECE OF CAKE TO INFILTRATE THE WEE GROUP AT SHAHEEN BAGH WHO ARE FUNDED BY PAKISTANI ISI / JEWISH COMMIE DEEP STATE NGOs..

      BEFORE 1962 WAR, THERE WERE THOUSANDS OF INDIAN TRAITOR COMMIES FUNDED BY CHINA..

      NEHRU EASILY FLUSHED THEM OUT, THE WAY JEW HITLER FLUSHED THE ANAL SEX RECEIVING HOMOSEXUAL JEWS OUT ( UNFIT TO BE IN THE PROMISED LAND )..

      JUST HOURS BEFORE THE 1962 WAR WITH CHINA NEHRU THREW INTO JAIL THOUSANDS OF TRAITOR COMMIES-- SOME HIGH RANKING BENGALI MEN IN ARMY..

      NEHRU ALREADY HAD THE COMPLETE LIST OF TOP INDIAN COMMIES IN THE PAYROLL OF THE RUSSIAN COMMUNIST PARTY BEFORE THE 1962 WAR WITH CHINA BY RUSSIAN PREMIER NIKITA KHRUSHCHEV… THESE COMMIES HAD SHIFTED LOYALTIES TO MAOs CHINA PISSING OFF RUSSIA ..

      NEHRU CREATED COMMIE COFFEE HOUSES IN CALCUTTA --AND GAVE THE SPIN THAT COMMIE "INTELLECTUALS " DISCUSS COMMUNISM OVER COFFEE …

      CHO0T BONG COMMIES --GOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE CALLED INTELLECTUALS … THEY WENT IN DROVES TO DRINK COFFEE , LOUDLY BOASTING OF THEIR EXPLOITS … THIS IS DESPITE BONGS PREFERING TEA OVER COFFEE …..

      IT MADE THEM FEEL MAHAAA IMPORTANT-- …….. LIKE HOW JNU COMMIES HAVE INTELLECTUAL DISCUSSIONS IN CAMPUS DHABBAS ABOUT AJJADDI, CRICKET AND BOLLYWOOD …..

      THE COFFE HOUSE WAITERS WERE ALL GOVT SPIES. EVEN WALLS HAD EARS …..

      WHEN THESE TRAITOR CUSTOMERS WENT HOME THEY WERE FOLLOWED AND THEY WOULD GET ARRESTED LATER…. IN JAIL THE COMMIES WERE PUT TOGETHER AND THERE WERE GOVT SPIES IN JAIL PRETENDING TO BE ARRESTED COMMIES…

      NIKITA KHRUSHCHEV ALSO TOLD NEHRU THE EXACT SPOTS WHERE BONG COMMIE LEADERS HAD SECRET TRANSMITTER / RECEIVER RADIO SETS WITH BEIJING CHIP….

      TODAY THE INDIAN COMMIES HAVE NO LOVE FOR THE WATAN-- THEY IDENTIFY WITH A STRANGE IDEOLOGY …

      COMMUNISM IN INDIA WAS ALL ABOUT GRABBING LAND, AND BURNING GOVT LAND REGISTRY OFFICES… THEY KILLED THE REGISTRARS AND EVEN RETIRED REGISTRARS …

      SOME OF THE COMMIE PROFESSORS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ FTII/ TISS ARE IN FOREIGN PAYROLL… THESE PROFESSORS LIVE FAR BEYOND THEIR SALARIES...

      SOME WOMEN PROFESSORS ( UGLY ONES ) GET SERVICED BY NAXAL STUDENTS AND HANDSOME SEPARATIST STUDENTS …

      TELGI STAMP PAPER SCAM WAS NOT ABOUT MAKING MONEY WITH STAMP PAPER--IT WAS ABOUT GRABBING LAND , MAKING FORGED LAND DEEDS AND INSERTING IT IN GOVT REGISTRY OFFICES….

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/12/telgi-stamp-paper-scam-must-be-exhumed.html

      THESE COMMIE BASTARDS WHEN THEY CAME OUT OF JAIL- THOUSANDS OF THEM---- PISSED ON FOOD BAGS IN FCI GODOWNS ( CONCERTED EFFORT ) AND CAUSED THE GREAT FAMINE , WHICH INTRODUCED THE KOSHER GREEN REVOLUTION OF DEEP STATE AGENT MS SWAMINATHAN…

      OUR HOLY HUMUS LADEN TOP TOIL WAS RAPED BY ARTIFICIAL FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES KILLING BENEFICIAL MICROBES .. 90% OF OUR LAKES WHICH SURVIVED IN PRISTINE CONDITION FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS WERE KILLED IN JUST 50 YEARS

      JEW HITLER CREATED GAY BEER BARS IN GERMANY TO PROFILE RECEIVING ANAL SEX RECEIVING GAYS .

      THESE PANSY EFFEMINATE QUEERS CONSIDERED WORSE THAN ANIMALS , HAD NO PLACE IN THE PROMISED LAND OF ISRAEL ….

      JEW HITLER RECRUITED ONLY HUMPING GAYS IN HIS NAZI SS YOUTH WING …

      AFTER HAVING GAY SEX THE PANSY WAS IMMEDIATELY ARRESTED BY HITLERs AGENTS WHO HAD ANAL SEX WITH HIM .. . .

      THIS METHOD WAS 100% SURE AND NOTHING WAS LEFT TO SPECULATION . . ..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/10/if-zionist-jews-created-isis-who.html

      CONTRARY TO WHAT ROTHSCHILD HISTORIANS HAVE WRITTEN HITLER EXTERMINATED ONLY JEW RECEIVING PARTY GAYS AND ROMA GYPSIES . …... .

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/11/history-of-romani-gypsies-capt-ajit.html

      WHEN KERALA COMMIE LEADER VS ACHUTHANANDAN WANTED TO DONATE BLOOD TO JAWANS WHILE IN JAIL, HE WAS BEATEN UP BADLY BY ALL OTHER COMMIE LEADERS FROM BENGAL AND ANDHRA ..

      HE NEARLY DIED..

      Capt ajit vadakayil
      ..





















    COMMENTS IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED

    MAKE COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW--

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_8.html



    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 7 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0

    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 6, BELOW--




    READ AND DIGEST THIS MAD THEORY OF MARX —



    I WILL PUNCH HOLES INTO THIS SOON


    http://reality.gn.apc.org/econ/gik1.htm


    The whole of the key Chapter Eight of Capital is a deliberate and systematic falsification to prove a thesis which an objective examination of the facts showed was untenable
    Chapter 8: Constant and Variable Capital
    Outline of Marx's Analysis
    Constant Capital = c
    – the value invested in the means of production, MP
    – the value embodied in MP
    Variable Capital = v
    – the value invested in the hiring of labor-power, LP
    – hired labor-power, LP
    Labor
    – preserves old value, by virtue of its character as useful labor
    – creates new value, by virtue of its character as abstract labor
    Workers
    – create new value; more work, more value
    – if more than the value of their labor-power, v, they create surplus-value, s
    MP
    – transfer their value to the product as they are used up
    – quickly for raw materials
    – over time for tools and machinery (depreciation)
    – "their value undergoes a metempsychosis. It deserts the consumed body to occupy the newly created one."
    Secondary points:

    1) Marx treats the value imparted to machines during repairs the same as their original creation. The repair labor is added to the original labor to determine their value. So depreciation is that "which no doctor can cure."
    2) with the value embodied in the product = c + v + s,

    – rise or fall of the SNLT required for producing MP or LP will result in a rise or fall in the value of c + v

    – thus s will diminish or increase accordingly


    Marx resorted to the mother of all economic plug variables: only “Socially Necessary Labor” counts toward value.


    The biggest problem with Marx’s Labor Theory of Value is that the whole “socially necessary labor” caveat reduces it to a meaningless tautology, essentially stating, “only labor that creates value creates BAHLOOO nay value.”

    The definition of socially necessary labour time of Das Kapital is the amount of labour time performed by a worker of average skill and productivity, working with tools of the average productive potential, to produce a given commodity. This is an "average unit labour-cost", measured in working hours.


    SNLT -- is labor time that society needs to spend in order to produce some commodity. That time depends on the skills of workers, machinery available, current needs of society.

    Marx's use of language in this chapter is misleading. Writing of labor "preserving,""transferring" or "creating" value makes value sound like some metaphysical essence, some ethereal substance which can be conjured into being, conserved or transferred from one object to another.

    This is particularly true when he writes of value undergoing a "metempsychosis," a term which usually refers to the transmigration of souls from one body to another. These verbs, preserve, create, transfer, are all transitive verbs that seem to have an object: value. Because value is not an object, but a sociopolitical aspect of labor, these words obscure the phenomena they are intended to evoke. 

    "Creating" value is nothing more than the simple act of working within the context of capitalist institutions. Workers "create" value every time their labor performs the roles capital assigns to it, i.e., creating commodities that are sold and on which a surplus-value is realized, and, in the process, serving to keep people's lives centered on work, now and in the future.

    Socially necessary labour time ( SNLT ) in Marx's critique of political economy is what regulates the exchange value of commodities in trade and consequently constrains producers in their attempt to economise on labour. It does not 'guide' them, as it can only be determined after the event and is thus inaccessible to forward planning.


    "Preserving" or "transferring" value refers simply to how useful labor, if it is performed competently, guarantees that the SNLT previously embodied in raw materials and machinery becomes part of the total SNLT required for the creation of the final product. Incompetent labor (or intentional sabotage), which results in wasted raw materials, broken machinery or flawed products, not only fails to add new value but nullifies the previous labor that went into producing the means of production. 

    Marx chooses to put us in fog.


    Unlike individual labour hours in the classical labour theory of value formulated by Adam Smith and David Ricardo, Marx's exchange value is conceived as a proportion (or 'aliquot part') of society's labour-time.

    "Socially necessary" qualification to labour time IS BULLSHIT    Marx vacillates  between a field theory (labour-time currently socially necessary) and a substance theory of value (embodied labour-time).


    Confusion of the process of labour in general (adding use to a product, which under capitalism equates adding value to a commodity) with the task of quantifying the exchange value added. 

    The general process affixes labour time to a commodity, and providing the commodity functions as such the quantity of labour time is immaterial—an abstract unknown, so to speak—and can be expressed in many ways, e.g. "embodied in", "attached to", "associated with", etc. 

    Quantifying the amount of labour time associated with commodities requires focus on the social, shifting character of socially necessary labour, and specifically recognition that the quantities are 'current' i.e. incessantly changing. 

    Today's value is different from yesterday's and tomorrow's, and the amount of value can only be determined numerically on the basis of a given point in time at which values are realized simultaneously at specific prices. 

    Thus Marx's theory is best interpreted as a field theory, but for the reasons just stated, modelling the determination of value by socially necessary labour time mathematically is a STUPID  exercise

    Mad Marx believed that humanity's defining characteristic was its means of production and thus the only way for man to free himself from oppression was for him to take control of the means of production. According to Marx, this is the goal of history and the elements of the superstructure act as tools of history

    Mao Zedong with Joseph Stalin in 1949; both of them created totalitarian governments that suppressed individual rights


     Marxist regimes would lead to the "despotic control of the populace by a aristocracy— where beggars dressed up as kings..  

    In Kerala second standard failed commie MM Mani is Minister for electricity..  

    This useless fellow was directly responsible for Kerala floods two years ago, by playing to the gallery and micro managing dam shutters.  

    You think MM Mani can understand Das Kapital’s bullshit Malayalam translation MOOLADHANAM , done by Commie EMS Namboodiripad?


    Their new-found power would fundamentally change their view of society and thus lead them to "look down at the plain working masses".

    The stupid economic system proposed by Marxism is unworkable.

    A MAD MAN NAMED MARX WROTE A MAD THEORY AND THIS CAUSED DEATHS OF MORE THAN 200 MILLION PEOPLE


    Marxism is irrelevant, its core tenets and assumptions and bullshit.   

    Das Kapital is an obsolete textbook  not only scientifically erroneous but without interest or application for the modern world. 

    Marxist economics is at a dead end

    Marx himself admitted that his theory could not explain the internal development of the INDIAN " social system, where much of the world's population lived well for several thousands of years soaked in spirituality ( not atheism ) and rule of Dharma.


    Marx never understood the laws of dialectics , and the way he ridiculously applied half baked ideas are fundamentally flawed

    MARX AND HEGEL DID NOT EVEN KNOW THE MEANING OF DIALECTICS PENNED IN VEDANTA 7000 YEARS AGO..

    he Indian rishis were the first to engage their great minds in dialectics in philosophy—the  method of investigating the nature of truth by the criticism of initial concepts and hypotheses—all in the most peaceful natural surroundings  .

    The ancient Indian Vedic dialectic is based on a dialogue between two or more rishis , master or student - people who may hold differing views, yet wish to pursue truth by seeking agreement with one another.

    This is in contrast to debate, in which two or more people hold differing views and wish to persuade or prove one another wrong (and thus a jury or judge is needed to decide the matter), or rhetoric, which is a relatively long monologue oration conducted by a single stupid person.

    Marxism, its philosophy is rejected  as violating the most elementary laws of logic
    and preconditions of rational thought.

    Stupid Lenin called dialectics ‘the concrete analysis of concrete conditions’. When dialectical thinkers talk about  contradictions they are referring to conflicts  of opposing forces or tendencies in things. .  dialectics  is a logic in the sense that it specifies the laws of thought which must be adhered to if reality is to be grasped concretely.

    Marx was a utter failure as a prophet. Jew Rothschild triggered revolutions using the useless theories of Mad Marx , to grab wealth and power-- that changed the course of history.

     At the base of historical materialism and of Marx's view of history is the concept of the "material productive forces." These "forces" are the driving power that creates all historical events and changes. So what are these "material productive forces"? This is never made clear.

    LEADERSHIP IS ABOUT UNDERSTANDING THE MEAN YOU LEAD..  COMPETITION IS INDISPENSABLE TO PROGRESS..


    MARXISM WAS – AND REMAINS – A MIGHTY INSTRUMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION AND MAINTENANCE OF POLITICAL POWER BY SLIMY AND COVERT MEANS ..   JEW  ROTHSCHILD UNDERSTOOD THIS DAMN WELL.

    Most forms of Marxism analyses people's class based on objective factors (class structure)

    Marx failed to incorporate capital markets or subjective values in his analysis, nullifying most of his more pronounced conclusions

    Like the other classical economists, Karl Marx believed in the labor theory of value to explain relative differences in market prices.

    This theory stated that the value of a produced economic good can be measured objectively by the average number of labor-hours required to produce it.  In other words, if a table takes twice as long to make as a chair, then the table should be considered twice as valuable.

    Das Kapital: If goods and services tend to be sold at their true objective labor values as measured in labor hours, how do any capitalists enjoy profits?

    It must mean, Marx concluded, that capitalists were underpaying or overworking, and thereby exploiting, laborers to drive down the cost of production.


    While Marx's answer was eventually proved incorrect and later economists adopted the subjective theory of value, his simple assertion was enough to show the weakness of the labor theory's logic and assumptions; Marx unintentionally helped fuel a STUPID revolution in economic thinking.


    For Mad Marx who had no idea of the subjective , class has three primary facets:--

    Objective factors--
    A class shares a common relationship to the means of production. That is, all people in one class make their living in a common way in terms of ownership of the things that produce social goods. A class may own things, own land, own people, be owned, own nothing but their labor. A class will extract tax, produce agriculture, enslave and work others, be enslaved and work, or work for a wage.

    Subjective factors--
    The members will necessarily have some perception of their similarity and common interest. Marx termed this Class consciousness. Class consciousness is not simply an awareness of one's own class interest (for instance, the maximisation of shareholder value; or, the maximization of the wage with the minimization of the working day), class consciousness also embodies deeply shared views of how society should be organized legally, culturally, socially and politically. BRRAAAYYYY…

    Reproduction of class relations--

    Class as a set of social relationships that is reproduced from one generation to the next



    Almost all of Marx's predictions have failed nay fallen PHUTTT on its face . 

    Low flying messiah Marx predicted that wages would tend to depreciate and that capitalist economies would suffer worsening economic crises leading to the ultimate overthrow of the capitalist system.   The socialist revolution would occur first in the most advanced capitalist nations and once collective ownership had been established then all sources of class conflict would disappear.


    Instead of Marx's predictions, communist revolutions took place in undeveloped regions in Latin America and Asia instead of industrialized countries like the United States or the United Kingdom ( triggered by Jew Rothschild using Jews to steal  ).

    Marx professed himself an atheist, but retained a cosmic optimism which only theism could justify

    Vladimir Lenin’s Bolsheviks ( all Jews ) overthrew the Russian government and established a communist dictatorship. The world has never been the same since.

    Of all the legacies left in the revolution’s wake, the worst is a wrecked Russia.
    30 million people perished in the Great Terror.  Maoist China,  destroyed 72 million lives

    The Commie Soviets had failed to deliver on their grand social promises.

    A BITTER LEGACY OF MARX IS TOTALITARIAN TERROR: STARTING WITH THE GREAT TERROR OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION, A TERRIBLE PRECEDENT WAS SET.   NOW THE GATES WERE OPEN FOR OTHERS TO MOBILIZE MASS VIOLENCE IN THE NAME OF REVOLUTION.

    THE USE OF TERROR TO REVOLUTIONIZE SOCIETY IS AN HISTORICAL PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED BY THE BOLSHEVIKS (AND THE FRENCH REVOLUTIONARIES BEFORE THEM)--.  BOTH DONE BY JEW ROTHSCHILD.

    GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD SIPHONED OFF THE HUMONGOUS WEALTH OF THE CZAR AND ALSO THE PRIVATE WEALTH OF THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE— BY A COMMIE POLICY WERE NOBODY CAN OWN PROPERTY FIXED OR MOVABLE ( PSSSST UNLESS YOU ARE A JEW ) ..  

    HIDING WEALTH LIKE GOLD MEANT DEATH IN THE ICY GULAG

    Most of the 88 countries that score “repressed” or “mostly unfree” on The Index of Economic Freedom are either communist, former communist, or of some variation of a socialist economy.

    Today communism and crude Marxism are dead in America (except for some university departments like Columbia / Berkley UC and extremist Neocon political circles).  

    Both Columbia / Berkley UC has Jewsih Commie professors who micromanage the social sciences depts.   Of JNU/ DU/ JU/ TISS and now IITs.. Huge money is involved in bribing Indian Commie professors..

    Rahul Gandhi was called to Berkley UC by Sam Pitroda and given questions in advance..   This stupid fellow surprised all Indians with his clear thinking and confident body language. TEE HEEEEE..

    The New Left of the 1960s dropped the proletariat and abandoned the stodgy old men in the Kremlin.  Instead, they adopted the hip new mantle of sexual and other forms of liberation in the name of equality— balls to Marxian economics , which went PHUTTT anyways..


    The New Left’s attempt to distance itself from the old left of communism was brilliant politics.  It enabled liberals to disown all the evil created by “their side of history.” They could now argue with a straight face that all that genocide and misery wrought by communism “has nothing to do with us.”


    How, do historical changes take place in the Marxian schema? They can only take place in technological methods, since everything else in society is determined by the state of technology at any one time. In short, if the state of technology is T and everything else is the determined superstructure, S, then to Marx,

    Tn → Sn

    where n is any point of time. But then, the only way in which social change can take place is via change in technology, in which case

    Tn + 1 → Sn + 1

    As Marx put it in the clearest and starkest statement of his technological determinist view of history, in his Poverty of Philosophy:

    In acquiring new productive forces men change their mode of production, and in changing their mode of production, their means of gaining a living, they change all their social relations. The hand mill gives you society with the feudal lord; the steam mill society with the industrial capitalist.

    The first grave fallacy in this farrago is right at the beginning: Where does this technology come from? And how do technologies change or improve? Who puts them into effect?

     A key to the tissue of fallacies that constitute the Marxian system is that Marx never attempts to provide an answer. Indeed he cannot, since if he attributes the state of technology or technological change to the actions of man, of individual men, his whole system falls apart.

    For human consciousness, and individual consciousness at that, would then be determining material productive forces rather than the other way round. We are merely told that the relations of production become fetters on the productive forces. Marx merely asserts this point, and never even attempts to offer a cause, material or otherwise

    Part of the deep confusion is both generated, and camouflaged, by Marx's failure to define "relations of production" adequately. This concept apparently includes legal property relations. 

    But if legal property relations were at fault in this dialectical delay in adjustment, thus setting up the "fetters," then Marx would be conceding that the problem is really legal or political rather than economic.

    But Marx baby wanted the determining base to be purely economic; the political and the ideological had to be merely part of the determined superstructure. So "social relations of production," allegedly economic, were the fetters; but this can only makes sense if this means the property rights or legal system.

    And so slimy Marx got out of his dilemma by being so fuzzy and ambivalent about the "relations of production" that these relations could be taken either as including the property structure, as identical with that structure, or else the two might be totally separate entities.

    The entire concept of "relations of production," so necessary to the Marxian thesis of material or economic determinism, serves Marx as a "ghost battalion closing a vital gap in the front of Marxian theory”..

    Yet in all this there is no way that the concept of "relations of production" can make economic determinism intelligible, and there is no way by which these relations can either be determined by the modes of production or can in themselves determine the property rights system.

    The only possible coherent chain of causation, in contrast, is the other way round: from ideas to property rights systems to the fostering or crippling the growth of saving and investment, and of technological development.

    Modern day  Marxists, have often tried to save the day from the embarrassment of the technological determinism of Marx . They maintain that all sophisticated Marxists know that the causation is not unilinear, that the base and the superstructure really influence each other. Sometimes, they try to fudge the data to claim that Marx himself took such a sophisticated position.

    Either way, they are characteristically obfuscating the fact that they have in reality abandoned Marxism. Marxism is monocausal technological determinism, along with all the rest of the fallacies depicted, or it is nothing, and it has demonstrated no inevitable or even likely dialectic mechanism.

    Technological determinism is a reductionist theory that assumes that a society's technology determines the development of its social structure and cultural values.

    Marx argued that changes in technology, and specifically productive technology, are the primary influence on human social relations and organizational structure, and that social relations and cultural practices ultimately revolve around the technological and economic base of a given society. 

    Marx's position has become embedded in contemporary society, where the idea that fast-changing technologies alter human lives is pervasive

    Karl Marx is often interpreted as a technological determinist on the basis of such isolated quotations as: 'The windmill gives you society with the feudal lord: the steam-mill, society with the industrial capitalist' ('The Poverty of Philosophy', 1847), and determinism certainly features in orthodox Marxism.

    The whole of Marx's work sprang from his transformative critique of Hegelian idealism and his disavowal of  Feuerbachian materialism.  

    German Jew  Ludwig Feuerbach is best known for his bullshit book The Essence of Christianity, which provided a critique of Christianity that strongly influenced generations of later thinkers, including Charles Darwin, Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Engels, and Friedrich Nietzsche.

    In Marx's account, human activity is objective activity, neither an activity devoid of real human sensuousness nor the simple perception of reality, but conscious interpenetration.

    Marxian class theory asserts that an individual’s position within a class hierarchy is determined by their role in the production process, and argues that political and ideological consciousness is determined by class position.  

    A class is those who share common economic interests, are conscious of those interests, and engage in collective action which advances those interests. Within Marxian class theory, the structure of the production process forms the basis of class construction.

    The very term "subjective" has often functioned as an insult in Marxist polemics.  Not only does it suggest something less than the lucidly objective understanding all science covets; even worse, it smacks of an anachronistic world of philosophical disputation, where idealists discourse on the unreality of the material world.

    The Marxist theory of history, ultimately adopted this soothsaying practice. In some of its earlier formulations (for example in Marx's analysis of the character of the 'coming social revolution') their predictions were testable, and in fact falsified.

    Yet instead of accepting the refutations the followers of Marx re-interpreted both the theory and the evidence in order to make them agree.   In this way they rescued the theory from refutation; but they did so at the price of adopting a device which made it irrefutable. 

    They thus gave a 'conventionalist twist' to the theory; and by this stratagem they destroyed its much advertised claim to scientific status.

    Marx’s theory was saved from falsification by the addition of ad hoc hypotheses which attempted to make it compatible with the facts – but degenerated into pseudoscientific dogma.

    Marxists used dialectic as a slimy method of side-stepping and evading criticisms, rather than actually answering or addressing them.



    THE BEST COMMUNISM'S PRESENT-DAY CHEERLEADERS CAN MANAGE IS TO ARGUE THAT THE SYSTEM HAD 'POSITIVE ASPECTS'.. NOT ONE SINGLE JNU/ JU COMMIE KNOWS A SHIT ABOUT MRAXISM AND DAS KAPITAL—ALL ARE PRETENDERS

    FOR ALL THE DREAMS OF ABOLISHING CLASS, COMMUNISM ENDED IN HIGHLY STRATIFIED SOCIETIES


    THE FAIREST WAY TO JUDGE A POLITICAL SYSTEM IS BY ITS STATED GOALS. AND BY THAT MEASURE COMMUNISM FAILED NAY FELL PHUTT ON ITS FACE

    Marx was never the great man he was made out to be by Rothschild’s media..  He was a screw master frequenting cheap whorehouses.. 

    Marx was a mean sadist and an authoritarian. He treated people with whom he disagreed in a crude and sarcastic way, often ridiculing them in public gatherings.

    Marx had no hesitation about being a hypocrite; when he wanted something from someone he would flatter them in letters or conversation, but then attack them in nasty language behind their backs to others.

    He often used racial slurs and insulting words to describe the mannerisms or appearance of his opponents in the socialist movement. 

    Jew Marx had meanness in his DNA.. After all his ancestors were rabid rabbis on both sides of the family.


    Marx was not bright enough even to imagine this truth – “Every a baby girl takes care of her own doll, not her commie government’s doll”.

    It makes no difference to a victim if he is murdered in the name of a better future for the superior race or because he belongs to a social class that has no place in a communist society.

    It is a central part of Marxist thought that capitalists are parasitic oppressors of the working class and, as such, the main cause of social problems.


    Their very existence, therefore, is incompatible with the ideals of a communist society. It does not matter that German Jew Rothschild invented both Capitalism and Communism— milking both sides ..

    Is the killing of 200 million people justified in the mad pursuit of a classless society?

    People in Europe know that not a single Jewish Bourgeois was killed.. If at all a bourgeois was killed it had to be a Christian one.. The 200 million killed were all Proletariat.

    Russia under communism was a highly stratified society. And Jews laughed all the way to the kosher bank.




    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/08/chinese-revolution-biggest-genocide-on.html













    TO BE CONTINUED --




    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..


    RESPOND LIKE A CONSCIOUS HUMAN TO LIFEs PROBLEMS, DO NOT REACT LIKE AN ANIMAL.- CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

    $
    0
    0




    Respected Sir,
    What is the difference between reacting to a situation and responding to it.
    Thank you
    1. QUICK THINKIN' TRINITY..

      YOU HAVE ASKED ME A GOOD QUESTION AFTER SEVERAL YEARS..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

    I HOLD THE WORLD RECORD FOR COMMANDING SHIPS CREWED BY UNITED NATIONS .. RESPONDING FOR MATURE CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND TEAMWORK IS MY TURF.. 

    NOBODY ON THIS PLANET CAN DO IT BETTER THAN CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL, WHO NEVER SUFFERED FOOLS GLADLY.. RATHER HE BLED THEM

    REMEMBER AS A SHIP CAPTAIN, I WORE EVERY POSSIBLE HAT.. LITERALLY JUGGLED THEM.. 

    I WAS A CONDOR, NOT A FROG IN THE WELL

    I HAVE NOT SEEN A SINGLE GOOD BOOK ON LEADERSHIP TILL TODAY..    THE WRITERS ARE NOT EVEN "ONE TRICK PONIES"

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/12/captain-sleeps-tonight-capt-ajit.html




    REACTION COMES FROM MOOLADHARA CHAKRA ( SURVIVAL SEAT ) , RESPONSE COMES FROM THE SAHASRARA CHAKRA ( WISDOM SEAT ).

    RESPOND LIKE A CONSCIOUS MAN TO LIFEs PROBLEMS,  DO NOT REACT LIKE AN ANIMAL.

    A REACTION IS TYPICALLY KNEE JERK QUICK, WITHOUT MUCH THOUGHT, TENSE AND AGGRESSIVE. 

    A RESPONSE ON THE OTHER HAND USUALLY COMES MORE SLOWLY AFTER THE INITIAL FLOOD OF ADRENALINE HAS PASSED. IT IS POSITIVE.

    A RESPONSE IS THOUGHT OUT, CALM AND NON-THREATENING. REACTIONS STOKE THE FIRES OF CONFLICT

    A REACTION IS TYPICALLY QUICK, WITHOUT MUCH THOUGHT, TENSE AND AGGRESSIVE.  A RESPONSE IS THOUGHT OUT, CALM AND NON-THREATENING. 

    A REACTION TYPICALLY NEGATIVE PROVOKES MORE REACTIONS – PERPETUATING A LONG LINE OF HATEFULNESS WITH NOTHING ACCOMPLISHED.

    WHEN YOU REACT, IN FIGHT OR FLIGHT MORE, EMOTIONS TAKE A CENTRAL ROLE..  WE LOSE CONTROL. REACTING IS SPORADIC AND EMOTIONAL.

    A REACTION IS BASED IN THE MOMENT AND DOESN'T TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION LONG TERM EFFECTS OF WHAT YOU DO OR SAY.


    A REACTION IS SURVIVAL-ORIENTED AND ON SOME LEVEL A DEFENSE MECHANISM. IT MIGHT TURN OUT OKAY BUT OFTEN A REACTION IS SOMETHING YOU REGRET LATER.





    COLLECT YOURSELF. BEFORE REACTING, PAUSE AND ALLOW YOUR INITIAL EMOTIONAL REACTION TO PASS. ...

    OUR PASSION NEEDS TO BE CENTERED ON PURPOSE, NOT AN UNEXPECTED, UNPRODUCTIVE STIMULUS.

    IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO REACT TO EVERYTHING YOU NOTICE.  YOUR EGO LANDS YOU IN A WORLD OF HURT.. 

    HAVE FAITH IN YOURSELF, DON’T DISCARD YOUR SELF RESPECT , REMAIN STABLE..   THERE IS NO NEED TO BELITTLE  OTHERS TO UPLIFT YOURSELF.





    REACTIONS POWERED BY EGO  DESTROYS PERFECT RELATIONSHIPS..

    THROUGH THE MOUTH, EGO LIVES IN WORDS.

    A MAN OF HONOR AVOIDS A FIGHT..  FOOLS LOVE TO QUARREL..  THERE IS NO NEED TO OVER-REACT.  YOU CAN SEE THAT IN HINDI BIGG BOSS.



    CUNTS WHO REACT FIGHT WITH A MAD DOG AT MIDNIGHT FOR RIGHT OF PASSAGE.    PEOPLE LOSE SELF RESPECT BY TRYING TO SAVE THEIR EGO..

    WHEN YOU REACT WITH NO REACTION –IT IS RESPONSE.   INDIFFERENCE BREEDS WHEN YOU NEITHER REACT OR RESPOND.. LEADERS MUST NEVER BE INDIFFERENT..


    AS A LEADER I NEVER CARED FOR POPULARITY MEDALS..

    REMEMBER NEVER TAKE THINGS PERSONAL WHEN YOU ARE A LEADER..   MOST PEOPLE ARE JUST TRYING TO SURVIVE BY LEADING THEIR OWN LIVES ..  EVERYTHING IS NOT ABOUT “YOU”.

    REACTIONS BY BRAINLESS MANAGERS STOKE MASSIVE FIRES AND CAUSE STRIKES..  LEADERS RESPOND AND REMAIN IN CONTROL AT ALL TIMES.   

    THEY CAN RE CONCILIATE FOR HEALING AND PERMANENT PEACE.  PEACE DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU HAVE CAPITULATED, YOU ARE STILL STRONG.


    WHEN JEALOUSY IS A REACTION , YOU WILL SELF DESTRUCT SOONER THAN LATER



     PEOPLE WHO RESPOND DO NOT SPLIT FAALTHU HAIRS—  LIKE HOW YOU SEEN ON BIGG BOSS REALITY SHOWS. YOU WASTE YOUR POWER ..


    REACTION IS OFTEN AGGRESSIVE.  RESPONSE ALLOWS FOR ASSERTIVENESS WITHOUT AGGRESSION.


    PEOPLE STEEPED IN SPIRITUALITY NEVER REACT KNEE JERK.

    .
    LEARN TO BE IN THE MOMENT.. THEN THE PAST HAS NOW POWER OVER YOU.. SO SAYS 6000 YEAR OLD BHAGWAD GITA.. FUTURE HAPPENS IN THE NOW. 

    THERE IS NO NEED TO SURRENDER TO FALSEHOODS.


    TUNE IN TO YOUR FEELINGS. ...

    RESPONSES CONTAIN REASONING.  RESPONDING IS GUIDED LESS BY EMOTION AND MORE BY LOGIC  AND WIDOM
    .
    A DIPLOMAT RESPONDS.. HE CAN AVOID COSTLY AND DESTRUCTIVE WARS..

    A COUPLE CAN AVOID DIVORCE WITHOUT DESTROYING THE LIVES OF THEIR CHILDREN.. YOUR RESPONSE TO A SITUATION HAS THE POWER TO CHANGE THE SITUATION. 

    DO NOT JUMP INTO CONCLUSIONS ON BASIS ON FAALTHU ASSUMPTIONS POWERED BY SCANTY INFORMATION..

    NO RESPONSE IF A RESPONSE AND IS VERY POWERFUL AGAINS DESH DROHIS WHO TRY TO PROVOKE..

    Read both parts .


    ANGER CORRODES THE VESSEL MORE THAN ON WHAT IT IS POURED.  PUT YOUR BRAIN INTO GEAR BEFORE YOU PUT YOUR MOUTH INTO MOTION.

    GOOD PARENTING IS TEACHING A CHILD TO RESPOND,, TO REMAIN IN CONTROL OF CHOICES

    DO NOT LET YOUR EMOTIONS CLOUD AND DISABLE YOUR INTELLECT.  HORMONE DRIVEN PMS LADEN WOMEN FALL IN THIS CATEGORY..  YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN SEVERAL  PMS LADEN WOMEN LEADING MEN IN INDIAN POLITICS



    DON’T BE A PRISONER TO THE PAST.. BE A PIONEER TO THE FUTURE.

    .
    THE BEST WAY TO PREDICT YOUR FUTURE IS TO CREATE IT. WHAT CONSUMES YOUR MIND CONTROLS IT..

    SOUL AWAKENS ONLY WHEN EGO DIES.. 

    YOU HAVE TO LET GO WHO YOUR WERE TO BECOME WHO YOU WANNA BE

    PEOPLE WHO DO SVADHYAYA NEVER REACT KNEE JERK





    PEOPLE SOAKED IN SPIRITUALITY WHO DO SVADHAYAYA DO NOT BURN OUT..




    A TEACHER DOES NOT TEACH CONFLICT RESOLUTION.. BUT A MENTOR DOES..   I INTRODUCED MENTORING AT SEA



    ADVERSITY DOES NOT BUILD CHARACTER, RATHER IT REVEALS IT .   CONFLICT CAN DESTROY A TEAM.

    CONFLICT IS INEVITABLE IN LIFE , ENERGY AND TIME WASTING COMBAT IS OPTIONAL .






























    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ...

    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 8 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0


    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 7 BELOW--

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_17.html




    Mann Mein Aghna Se Bhare Bolo Kahan Jaaye...
    Saam Daam Dand Bhed... Saam Daam Dand Bhed
    Yeh Trishna Se Bhare Bolo Kahan Jaaye
    Sarkar Ke Dhwar Pe Jaake Teher Jaaye
    Anyay Ke Saath Mein Kaise Jiye Jaaye
    Sarkar Ke Dhwar Pe Jaake Tehar Jaaye
    Anyay Ke Saath Mein Kaise Jiye Jaaye
    Sarkar Ke Dhwar Pe Jaake Tehar Jaaye

    Sarkar Besaar Ko Bhoole Na Bhoole Na

    A LOT OF CELEBRITIES THINK THAT BY SHOWING THAT THEY ARE LEFT LEANING ,  SHOWCASES THEM AS “FOR THE PEOPLE”.     FILM STARS THINK IT WILL INCREASE THEIR BOX OFFICE COLLECTIONS

    NONSENSE !

    COMMUNISM WAS CREATED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO ENSLAVE PEOPLE AND GRAB THEIR PRIVATE WEALTH AND FAMILY HEIRLOOMS ( GOLD/ JEWELS ) PASSED DOWN FOR CENTURIES..



    1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeMt9r3oTfs

      WE WONT ALLOW COMMIE GITA GOPINATH TO RUN DOWN INDIA.. SHE DOES NOT HAVE A TECHNICAL BRAIN..

      GITA BABY IS IMF CHIEF ONLY BECAUSE SHE IS THE BLOOD RELATIVE OF ROTHSCHILDs AGENT COMMIE AK GOPALAN..

      GITA GOPINATH AND OTHER WESTERN ECONOMISTS DO NOT KNOW THE BASICS OF ECONOMICS.

      WE ASK PM MODI-- REMOVE DAS KAPITAL ( COMMIE ECONOMICS ) OF KARL MARX FROM EVERY UNIVERSITY IN INDIA, AND BURN THEM..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_21.html

      HEY GITA BABY--

      GOOGLE FOR THE POST BELOW-- READ QUESTIONS TO QUORA 686 TO 820..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/archived-questions-to-quora-from-capt.html

      DAS KAPITAL IS MINDLESS BULLSHIT... JEW KARL MARX ( BLOOD RELATIVE OF GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD ) WAS A MAD MAN..HE IS NOT THIS PLANETs NO 1 THINKER , AS TOM TOMMED BY ROTHSCHILD MONOPLOSED MEDIA..

      MY MOTHER/ WIFE/ CHILDREN ARE FROM KANNUR-- GITA GOPINATH IS ALSO FROM KANNUR .. WE KNOW HER FAMILY..

      INDIA GROWS TODAY AT 10.1%.. WE ARE THIS PLANETs NO 3 ECONOMY.. WE ARE THE ONLY NATION WITH POTENTIAL..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
      1. PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
        ROMILA THAPAR
        TRUMP
        PUTIN
        ANGELA MERKEL
        MACRON
        BORIS JOHNSON
        AMBASSADORS TO FROM USA/ RUSSIA/ GERMAY/ FRANCE / UK
        EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER/ MINISTRY INDIA
        AMARTYA SEN
        ABHIJEET BANNERJEE
        ESTHER DUFLO
        RBI GOVERNOR
        RBI
        GITA GOPINATH
        BEN BERNANKE
        KENNETH ROGOFF
        PIERRE-OLIVIER GOURINCHAS
        CHRISTINE LAGARDE
        MAURICE OBSTFELD
        KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA
        IQBAL DHALIWAL
        SHAKTIKANTA DAS
        URJIT PATEL
        D SUBBHARAO
        V VENUGOPAL REDDY
        BIMAL JAIN
        C RANGARAJAN
        RAGHURAM RAJAN
        NITI AYOG
        AMITABH KANT
        PMO
        PM MODI
        ALL INDIAN THINK TANKS
        ALL INDIAN MPs
        ALL INDIAN MLAs
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        AJIT DOVAL
        RAW
        IB
        NIA
        ED
        CBI
        AMIT SHAH
        HOME MINISTRY
        DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
        CDS
        I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        DAVID FRAWLEY
        STEPHEN KNAPP
        WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
        KONRAED ELST
        FRANCOIS GAUTIER
        THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
        SATYA NADELLA
        CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
        QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
        QUORA MODERATION TEAM
        KURT OF QUORA
        GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
        CHETAN BHAGAT
        ENTIRE BBC GANG
        PAVAN VARMA
        RAMACHANDRA GUHA
        MUKESH AMBANI
        RATA TATA
        ANAND MAHINDRA
        KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
        LAXMI NARAYAN MITTAL
        AZIM PREMJI
        KAANIYA MURTHY
        RAHUL BAJAJ
        RAJAN RAHEJA
        NAVEEN JINDAL
        GOPICHAND HINDUJA
        DILIP SHANGHVI
        GAUTAM ADANI
        DEANS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ TISS/ FTII

        JOHN BRITTAS
        KAMALAHASSAN
        ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
        CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
        DGPs OF ALL STATES
        GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
        PRESIDENT OF INDIA
        VP OF INDIA
        SPEAKER LOK SABHA
        SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
        CJI BOBDE
        ATTORNEY GENERAL
        ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
        ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
        LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
        ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
        RSS
        AVBP
        VHP
        MOHAN BHAGWAT
        RAM MADHAV
        ZOYA HASAN
        JAYATI GHOSH
        JAYRAM RAMESH
        PIYUSH GOYAL
        RK PACHAURI
        GRETA THUNBERG
        DILIP CHERIAN
        SANJAY R HEGDE
        IRFAN HABIB
        NIVEDITA MENON
        AYESHA KIDWAI
        SWARA BHASKAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        RANA AYYUB
        KAVITA KRISHNAN
        PRAKASH KARAT
        BRINDA KARAT
        SITARAM YECHURY
        D RAJA
        ANNIE RAJA
        SUMEET CHOPRA
        DINESH VARSHNEY
        PINARAYI VIYAYAN
        KODIYERI BALAKRISHNAN
        JOHN BRITTAS
        THOMAS ISAAC ( KERALA FINANCE MINISTER)
        SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
        NANDINI SUNDAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BIMAN BOSE
        MANIK SARKAR
        HANNAN MOLLAH
        MA BABY
        SURJYA KANTA MISHRA
        MOHAMMAD SALIM
        SUBHASHINI ALI
        BV RAGHAVULU
        G RAMAKRISHNAN
        TAPAN KUMAR SEN
        NILOTPAL BASU
        AK PADMANABHAN
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BUDDHADEB BHATTACHARYA
        NIRUPAM SEN
        K VARADARAJAN
        MOHAMMAD AMIN
        MK PANDHE
        HU XIJIN ( CHINESE GLOBAL TIMES EDITOR)
        DEAN BERKELEY UC
        DEAN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
        WENDY DONIGER
        AUDREY TRUSCHE
        SHELDON POLLOCK
        SRI SRI RAVISJANKAR
        SADHURU JAGGI VASUDEV
        BABA RAMDEV
        MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI
        K SUBBHARAYAN
        BINOY VISWAM
        TK RANGARAJAN
        SOLI BABY
        FALI BABY
        KATJU BABY
        SALVE BABY
        ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
        NALIN KOHLI
        GVL NARASIMHA RAO
        SAMBIT PATRA
        VIVEK OBEROI
        GAUTAM GAMBHIR
        ASHOK PANDIT
        ANUPAM KHER
        KANGANA RANAUT
        VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
        KIRON KHER
        MEENAKSHI LEKHI
        SMRITI IRANI
        PRASOON JOSHI
        MADHUR BHANDARKAR
        SWAPAN DASGUPTA
        SONAL MANSINGH
        MADHU KISHWAR
        SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
        GEN GD BAKSHI
        RSN SINGH
        E SREEDHARAN
        MOHANLAL
        SURESH GOPI
        CHANDAN MITRA
        THE QUINT
        THE SCROLL
        THE WIRE
        THE PRINT
        MK VENU
        MADHU TREHAN
        RAJDEEP SARDESAI
        PAAGALIKA GHOSE
        NAVIKA KUMAR
        ANAND NARASIMHAN
        SRINIVASAN JAIN
        SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
        VIKRAM CHANDRA
        NIDHI RAZDAN
        FAYE DSOUZA
        ZAKKA JACOB
        RAVISH KUMAR
        PRANNOY JAMES ROY
        AROON PURIE
        VINEET JAIN
        RAGHAV BAHL
        SEEMA CHISTI
        DILEEP PADGOANKAR
        VIR SANGHVI
        KARAN THAPAR
        PRITISH NANDI
        SHEKHAR GUPTA
        JAVED AKHTAR
        NASIRUDDIN SHAH
        KUNHALIKUTTY
        MAMOOTTY
        DULQUER SALMAN
        ADMIRAL RAMDAS
        KAVITA RAMDAS
        LALITA RAMDAS
        JOHN DAYAL
        KANCHA ILAIH
        TEESTA SETALVAD
        JEAN DREZE
        ARUDHATI ROY
        SHOBHAA DE
        JULIO RIBEIRO
        JAVED AKTHAR
        KUNHALIKKUTTY
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        FAZAL GHAFOOR ( MES )
        FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
        ANNA VETTICKAD
        DEEPIKA PADUKONE
        ARURAG KASHYAP
        ADVANI
        MURLI MNOHAR JOSHI
        KAMALAHASSAN
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        AK ANTONY
        OOMMEN CHANDY
        PC GEORGE
        ALL KERALA MPs AND MLAs
        TAPAN SEN
        KAPIL SIBAL
        ABHI SEX MAANGTHA SINGHVI
        MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
        SANJAY JHA
        POONAWALA BROTHERS
        RANDEEP SURJEWALA

        SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA




    Marx saw the living world in terms of a Darwinian ‘survival-of-the-fittest’ struggle, involving the triumph of the strong and the subjugation of the weak. Marx predicted the mass killings which would take place as a result of his proletariat revolution and he sought to justify it.

    Charles Darwin wrote  that the ‘survival of the fittest’ existed among all forms of life.  From this idea Marx believed that the major ‘struggle for existence’ among humans occurred primarily between the social classes.  Marx projected that  his own work to be the exact parallel of Darwin’s.   

    Darwin wrote what Rothschild wanted him to write..

    The communist core idea that violent revolution, in which the strong overthrow the weak, was a natural, inevitable part of the unfolding of history from Darwinistic concepts and conclusions.

    Acceptance of atheist Darwinism and rejection of religion were critical for the new movements of communism.

    Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859..  In a letter from December 19, 1860 addressed to his friend and colleague Friedrich Engels, Marx states that Darwin’s book contains “the basis in natural history for our view.”   Mad  Marx agreed with Mad Darwin that society, like the living beings on Earth, is the result of historical processes of change.

    Darwin did for the understanding of nature what Marx and Engels did for human society—he overturned teleology and essentialism and established a materialist basis for understanding how organisms change over time. And that is precisely what Marx meant when he said that On the Origin of Species “contains the basis in natural history for our view.”

    Marx wrote- “History itself is a real part of natural history and of nature’s development into man. Natural science will, in time, incorporate into itself the science of man, just as the science of man will incorporate into itself natural science: there will be one science”

    Marx  wrote in the The German Ideology “We know only a single science, the science of history. One can look at history from two sides and divide it into the history of nature and the history of men. The two sides are, however, inseparable; the history of nature and the history of men are dependent on each other so long as men exist”

    Engels wrote in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific: “ Nature works dialectically and not metaphysically … she does not move in the eternal oneness of a perpetually recurring circle, but goes through a real historical evolution. In this connection, Darwin must be named before all others. He dealt the metaphysical conception of Nature the heaviest blow by his proof that all organic beings, plants, animals, and man himself, are the products of a process of evolution going on through millions of years”.

    In 1845, in The German Ideology, Marx wrote that the ability to produce life’s needs distinguishes humans from other animals:--
      “Men can be distinguished from animals by consciousness, by religion or anything else you like. They themselves begin to distinguish themselves from animals as soon as they begin to produce their means of subsistence, a step which is conditioned by their physical organization. By producing their means of subsistence they are indirectly producing their material life”

    Engels wrote  in the late 1870s, in his unfinished book Dialectics of Nature:  --
    ”Let us accept for a moment the phrase “struggle for existence,” for argument’s sake. The most that the animal can achieve is to collect; man produces, he prepares the means of subsistence, in the widest sense of the words, which without him nature would not have produced. This makes impossible any unqualified transference of the laws of life in animal societies to human society”

    Darwin, , opened the door to Marxism by providing what Marx believed was a ‘scientific’ rationale to deny Creation and, by extension, to deny God. His denial of God, and his knowledge of Darwin, inspired Marx to develop his new godless worldview now known as communism. 

    And like other Darwinists, Marx stressed that his communistic worldview was ‘scientific’ and, as such, employed a ‘scientific methodology and scientific outlook

    In hand-written letter (November 24, 1880) to an American correspondent called F. McDermott , Chales Darwin  states that  “I do not believe in the Bible as a divine revelation, and therefore not in Jesus Christ as the son of God  “.

    This document was kept confidential for over 100 years at Darwin’s request and was on September 21, 2015 in New York by Bohams for a record price of almost USD 200,000.

    Darwin was right here as Jesus never existed and his life story was lifted from the life of Kerala sage Apollonius of Tyana . His side kick Damisa’s wife was Mary Magdalene.

    Read all 4 parts of the post below—

    Marx admired Darwin’s book,  not for economic reasons but for the more fundamental one that Darwin’s universe was purely materialistic, and the explication of it no longer involved any reference to unobservable, nonmaterial causes outside or “beyond” it. In that important respect,  Rothschild’s agents Darwin and Marx were truly Commie comrades .

    Marx saw the living world in terms of a Darwinian ‘survival-of-the-fittest’ struggle, involving the triumph of the strong and the subjugation of the weak. Darwin taught that the ‘survival of the fittest’ existed among all forms of life. From this idea Marx believed that the major ‘struggle for existence’ among humans occurred primarily between the social classes..

    In Marx’s words: ‘Darwin’s book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural selection for the class struggle in history. . . . not only is it (Darwin’s book) a death blow . . . to “Teleology” in the natural sciences but their rational meaning is empirically explained.

    Marx detested passionately any ‘belief in supernatural causes’.

    The importance of Darwinism in the estimated 200 million deaths caused by communism was partly because,  Clearly, for Marx man has no “nature”. . . . For man is his own maker and will consciously become his own maker in complete freedom from morality or from the laws of nature and of nature’s God. . . . 

    Here we see why Marxism justifies the ruthless sacrifice of men living today, men who, at this stage of history, are only partly human.

    The theoretical foundation of communism, . . is dialectical materialism which was expounded with great clarity by Frederick Engels in Anti-Dührüng and The Dialectics of Nature.  He recognized the great value of the contributions made by geology in establishing that there was constant movement and change in nature and the significance of Darwin’s demonstration that this applied also to the organic world. . . . 

    The crux of the entire theoretical framework, however, is in the nature of qualitative changes. This is also spelt out by Engels in The Dialectics of Nature, “a development in which the qualitative changes occur not gradually but rapidly and abruptly, taking the form of a leap from one state to another”. . . . Here then is the recipe for a bloody Commie revolution.. 

    Marx concluded that religion was a tool of the rich to subjugate the poor. He openly denounced religion as ‘the opiate of the people’, and in nearly every nation where the communists assumed power, the churches were neutered.

    Opium is a pain-killing drug and Marx characterized religion as having the same function, i.e. it was used to pacify the oppressed because it stressed peace, non-violence, and loving one’s neighbor. The result was it made them feel better but did not solve their problems.

    Marx felt that religion is not just an illusion: it had a deleterious social function, namely to distract the oppressed from the truth of their oppression and prevent people from seeing the harsh realities of their existence. So long as the workers and the downtrodden believed their patient, moral behavior and sufferings would earn them freedom and happiness in heaven, they would allow themselves to be oppressed. 

    Marx concluded that workers would change their perception of reality only when they realized that there is no God, no afterlife and no good reason not to have what they want now even if they have to take it from others.

    The solution, Marx argued, was to abolish religion, which then would allow the poor to openly revolt against their ‘oppressors’ (the land owners, the wealthy, the entrepreneurs, et al.) and take their wealth away so the poor could enjoy wealth and fulfillment in this world. 

    Furthermore, since ‘the rich and powerful aren’t just going to hand these over, the masses shall have to seize them’ by force—by gruesome murders .. Marx concluded that the ‘abolition of religion’ is a prerequisite for the attainment of real happiness of the people

    Marx’s eschatology, his materialistic philosophy of history is, for all practical purposes, a doctrine of permanent revolution, a doctrine which cannot but issue in periodic violence, terror and tyranny’..

    Consequently, an important cornerstone of communism was to take away the opium (religion) from the people and convince them that they should eat, drink and be merry now, for tomorrow they may die (and to have the resources to eat, drink and be merry, they should steal from the rich and the successful).

     Marx stressed that the Darwinist philosophy, aside from personal pleasures in the here and now, life in the long run has no meaning or purpose because we were accidents of nature that, in all likelihood, never again would occur on the Earth.

    To ensure that communism maintains its power base, it is necessary to indoctrinate people against religion

    Jew Lenin  was influenced significantly by Darwinism, and operated in accordance with the philosophy ‘fewer but better’, a restatement of natural selection

    Jew Stalin became an ‘avid Darwinian, abandoned the faith in God, and began to tell his fellow seminarians that people were descended from apes and not from Adam’

    The Communist ideal that ‘each takes according to his needs, and each gives according to his abilities’ all too often became ‘each takes whatever he can, and gives back as little as he can’. 

    The result has been economic bankruptcy for most Communist countries. The economic poverty of Russia and much of eastern Europe eloquently testifies to the abject failure of communism.

    Marx was influenced considerably by Hegel’s dialectic concept.  Jew George Hegel held that religion, science, history, and ‘most everything else’ evolves to a higher state as time progresses.   It does this by a process called the dialectic, in which a thesis (an idea) eventually confronts an antithesis (an opposing idea), producing a synthesis or a blend of the best of the old and new ideas .   

    Marx concluded that capitalism is the thesis, and the organized proletariat is the antithesis. Essentially, the central conflict in capitalism was between those who controlled the means of production (the owners, the wealthy class, or the bourgeoisie) and those who did the actual physical work (the workers or the proletariat). 

    Marx’s central idea was that the synthesis (i.e. communism) would emerge from the struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. This is illustrated by Marx’s famous phrase, ‘workers of the world unite and overthrow your oppressors’.


    Marx concluded that the masses (the workers—those persons who worked in the factories and the farms) would struggle with the business owners, the wealthy and the entrepreneurs. Since there were a lot more workers than owners, Marx believed that the workers eventually would overthrow the entrepreneurs by violent revolution, taking their factories and wealth. 

    The result would be a dictatorship by the proletariat. Marx then believed that private property would be abolished, and the workers would collectively own the country, including the farms and the means of production. 

    All the workers then would share equally in the fruits of their labor, producing a classless society in which everyone earned an equal amount of money. This philosophy obviously appealed to millions of people, especially the poor, the downtrodden, and many middle class people who had a concern for the poor.

    Communist revolutions resulted in forcibly taking the wealth from the land-owning classes, the wealthy, the industrialists and others. Appropriating the land and wealth from the property owners in general resulted in an enormous amount of widespread resistance.

    In India Commie were turncoats . They did whatever suited them when it came to killing and grabbing wealth and land


    Many of these people had built their wealth from hard work and astute business decisions, and were not willing to give up what in many cases they had worked very hard for years to obtain. A bloodbath resulted that took the lives of hundreds of millions of people. Those murdered often included the most talented entrepreneurs, the most skilled industrialists, and the intellectual backbone of the nation. 

    The workers were put in charge of the companies and factories once run by what Marx called the bourgeoisie; many of these workers lacked the skills and personal qualities necessary to run these businesses. Consequently, inferior products, low productivity and an incredible amount of waste was the rule for generations in the Communist world.

    Where else can you justify a Second Standard failed , illiterate commie named MM Mani being made “Electricity Minister”?.

    Can he answer one single question of the exam below?


    Marx’s theory unified Darwinism and revolution intrinsically and inseparably. Marx’s criminal claim to give scientific guidance to those who would transform society has been one of the chief reasons for his doctrine’s enormous influence.

    Jew Mao wrote - ‘We had to steel our will to fight in the struggle for existence, he told us. The weak would perish; only the strong would survive.’

    Mao was convinced that ‘without the continual pressure of natural selection’ humans would degenerate. This idea inspired Mao to advocate ‘the ceaseless revolution that brought China to the brink of ruin’

    In the minds of Jew Hitler, Jew Stalin and Jew Mao, treating people as animals was not wrong because they believed that Darwin had ‘proved’ humans were not God’s creation, but instead descended from some simple, one-cell organism. Romani gypsies and anal sex receiving Jews were marked for extermination by Jew Hitler.


    All three men believed it was morally proper to eliminate the less fit or ‘herd them like cattle into boxcars bound for concentration camps and gulags’ if it achieved the goal of their Darwinist philosophy

    Meanwhile Jew Rothschild tried his best to do forgery and create the MISSING LINK between man and monkey— “the Peking Man”,  “the Piltdown Man”, “missing link Lucy “ using circular electric saw and super glue.. Lucy still comes as a Google doodle..

    BELOW: EVR PERIYAR WAS BRAINWASHED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD WITH THE ATHEIST THEORIES OF JEW NEITZSCHE .. 


    BELOW:  ROTHSCHILD GAVE EVR PERIYAR A WORLD TOUR ON HIS SHIP-- TO ALL NATIONS HAVING TAMIL DIASPORA..   ROTHSCHILD KNEW THE TAMIL POPULATION AND LOCATION ABROAD, AFTER ALL HE CREATED IT.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/04/indentured-coolie-slavery-reinvented.html

    A LOT OF ATHEIST  TAMILIANS HAVE NAMES OF MASS MURDERERS LENIN AND STALIN




    BELOW: ROTHSCHILD ARRANGED FOR BR AMBEDKAR TO CONVERT TO BUDDHISM .. LAKHS WERE CONVERTED FROM HINDUISM TO BUDDHISM..  

    BUT THESE CONVERS CAME BACK TO HINDUISM AS SOON AS THEY LEARNT THAT BR AMBEDKAR MARRIED A "CHITPAVAN BRAHMIN"..

    BR AMBEDKAR WAS A STAR KID.. HIS GRANDFATHER WAS A FREE MASON AND RECRUITED MAHARS AS SOLDIERS , WHO FOUGHT FOR THE WHITE INVADER IN 1857.

    AS PER HINDU VARNA , SHUDRAS CANNOT BE KSHATRIYA WARRIORS .. SHIVAJI WAS A MAHAR, A RULER..  SABKO CHOOTIYA BANAYA..


    .
    Like Darwin, Marx thought he had discovered the law of development. He saw history in stages, as the Darwinists saw geological strata and successive forms of life. . . .

    Both Marx and Darwin made struggle the means of development. Again, the measure of value in Darwin is survival with reproduction—an absolute fact occurring in time and which wholly disregards the moral or esthetic quality of the product.  

    In Marx the measure of value is expended labor—an absolute fact occurring in time, which also disregards the utility of the product.

    Both Darwin and Marx tended to hedge and modify their mechanical absolution in the face of objections..

    Marx attended a series of lectures by Thomas Huxley on Darwin’s ideas, and spoke of nothing else for months but Darwin and the enormous significance of his scientific discoveries ( sic)..

    DARWIN SPONSORED BY ROTHSCHILD USED TO BE TERRIBLY SEASICK.. THE CAPTAIN OF THE NAVAL SHIP HMS BEAGLE ROBERT FITZROY  DOCKED HIS SHIP TO PREVENT DARWIN FROM DYING BY PUKING HIS GUTS OUT AT SEA.. 

    THIS CONVERTED DARWIN TO A “SCIENTIST”..

    The previous Captain Pringle Stokes has committed suicide in the straits of Magellan and Robert FitzRoy  was afraid that he would go the same way.

    On 1 August 1828 Stokes shot himself. The bullet remained within his skull, but Stokes remained conscious and coherent.Gangrene set in, and Stokes finally died on 12 August 1828.   

    Lieutenant William Skyring, the assistant surveyor, commanded the Beagle on its voyage to Montevideo for repairs. When it arrived there Robert FitzRoy, flag lieutenant of HMS Ganges, was given command. 

    FitzRoy commanded the Beagle on its celebrated second voyage from 1831 to 1836, with the young naturalist Charles Darwin on board. Many years later, FitzRoy also suffered from depression, and committed suicide in 1865.. Darwin would become mad on HMS Beagle.  

    DARWIN HIMSELF WROTE THAT HIS MENTAL PROBLEMS HAD AN ORIGIN IN HIS FIVE YEAR BOUT WITH SEASICKNESS ON HMS BEAGLE.

    EVEN WHEN PUT ASHORE TO  GET OVER HIS SEA SICKNESS, DARWIN WOULD STILL PUKE ..

     WHILE ASHORE DARWIN WOULD EAT IGUANAS AND ARMADILLOS WHICH AFFECTED HIS BRAIN ADVERSELY..

    For over forty years Darwin suffered intermittently from various combinations of symptoms such as: malaise, vertigo, dizziness, muscle spasms and tremors, vomiting, cramps and colics, bloating and nocturnal intestinal gas, headaches, alterations of vision, severe tiredness, nervous exhaustion, dyspnea, skin problems such as blisters all over the scalp and eczema, crying, anxiety, sensation of impending death and loss of consciousness, fainting, tachycardia, insomnia, tinnitus, and depression. These symptoms displayed by Darwin might be diagnosed today as a form of dysautonomia known as hyperadrenergic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome or orthostatic intolerance or relatedly, as mast cell activation syndrome. Despite all this he fucked his wife and produced 10 children

    IF DARWIN HAS NOT PUKED EVERY HOUR ON HMS BEAGLE,  WE WOULD NEVER HAD HEARD OF THIS FELLOW..

    At age 12, Darwin confessed in a letter that he only washed his feet once a month at school

    In 1831,  Darwin was just 22 years old when he boarded the ship.. He was to be more of a companion and a dining table mate to the Captain.. 

    On December 27, 1831, Charles Darwin went on board HMS Beagle in Devonport (Plymouth). For five years, the  crypto Jew Anglican parson Darwin– served as an unpaid naturalist on a science expedition on board HMS Beagle.  

    HMS Beagle was a WEE ship, just  90-foot long and 24-foot wide with three-masts.  I have commanded ship more than 1000 feet in length



    IT IS A SECRET THAT OUT OF THE 5 YEARS DARWIN SENT ON HMS BEAGLE , ONLY 15 MONTHS WERE AT SEA..  THE REST OF THE TIME HE WAS ASHORE , WITH A COUPLE OF SEAMEN.. 

    THE SHIP WOULD GO AWAY AND THEN COME BACK TO PICK UP DARWIN WHO WOULD BE PUKING LESS BY THEN. 

    On October 2, 1836, the ship reached English shores again. Rothschild ensured his media called Darwin a great scientist and an eminent geologist. This bastard was neither..

    On his visit to the Galapagos Islands, Charles Darwin discovered several species of finches that varied from island to island, which helped him to develop his mad theory of natural selection.  

    Natural selection leads to evolutionary change when individuals with certain characteristics have a greater survival or reproductive rate than other individuals in a population and pass on these inheritable genetic characteristics to their offspring.  

    Darwin's mad theory stated that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce

    Darwin almost missed the ship HM Beagle that took him to the Galapagos Islands and beyond, where he discovered evidence for evolution and started to realize its mechanism — natural selection.   The Captain thought he was dead, still they made a search and located him and the sailors kept to take care of him and feed him..

    Captain Robert FitzRoy had rejected Darwin to be his “companion” on the ship after being with him for a trail period of two weeks .. Another man was chosen.. This fellow just disappeared.

    Darwin delayed the publication of On the Origin of Species for more than two decades after he was convinced of his theory, because he was nervous about how it would be received. Darwin knew that his theory was all bullshit. 

    But Jew Rothschild used his clout and converted his mad theory to science—and the best part is it is still part of our NCERT syllabus in this DNA age.

    Life came on earth from a black meterorite stone called Shiva Lingam ( Shiva’s Phallus)


    Rotshchild tried to get Darwin’s theory published using another fellow Alfred Russel Wallace (who worked at Amazon river and Malay Archipelago collecting beetles ) , and this made “finch beak collector” Darwin angry and upset.. 

    Darwin was thus arm twisted to publish his mad theory which would kill 200 million people.

    BELOW: IT IS A SECRET THAT HMS BEAGLE WAS PROSPECTING MINERALS FOR ROTHSCHILD 


    DARWINs DATES WHEN HE WAS ON SOLID LAND ( DUE TO PUKING ON BOARD AT SEA ) DO NOT AGREE WITH THE SHIPs LOG MAINTAINED BY THE CAPTAIN.. 

    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/944/944-h/944-h.htm


    BELOW: MAD FELLOW DARWIN DISCARDED ASHORE BY A FURIOUS CAPTAIN KEPT FILLING HIS SACK WITH GOODIES LIKE DRIED FINCH BEAKS-- AND THEN HEY PRESTO--- .HE BECOMES THIS PLANETs GREATEST NATURALIST AND SCIENTIST

    HIS THEORY WOULD BE ASSIMILATED BY MAD MARX TO KILL 200 MILLION PEOPLE..

    REAL EVOLUTION IS SOUL EVOLUTION, NOT DARWINs BULLSHIT EVOLUTION..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/how-to-release-trapped-and-miserable.html

    BELOW:  DARWIN WAS PUT HERE ONLY BECAUSE THE SEAS HERE ARE CALM..

    DARWIN WOULD PUKE IF HE SAW ROUGH SEAS FROM LAND



    1. https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_21.html

      HEY DEGREE OVER DOWRY ROMILA THAPAR..

      DO YOU LIKE DARWIN MORE OR MARX MORE..

      CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS GRINDING BOTH INTO POWDER.. THERE WILL BE NO RESURRECTION..

      ENOUGH OF COMMIE NONSENSE..

      I AM STILL WAITING FOR YOUR RESPONSE ABOUT A DEBATE ON DAS KAPITAL LIVE ON TV ..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
      .
      1. PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
        ROMILA THAPAR
        TRUMP
        PUTIN
        ANGELA MERKEL
        MACRON
        BORIS JOHNSON
        AMBASSADORS TO FROM USA/ RUSSIA/ GERMAY/ FRANCE / UK
        EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER/ MINISTRY INDIA
        AMARTYA SEN
        ABHIJEET BANNERJEE
        GITA GOPINATH
        RAGHURAM RAJAN
        NITI AYOG
        AMITABH KANT
        PMO
        PM MODI
        ALL INDIAN THINK TANKS
        ALL INDIAN MPs
        ALL INDIAN MLAs
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        AJIT DOVAL
        RAW
        IB
        NIA
        ED
        CBI
        AMIT SHAH
        HOME MINISTRY
        DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
        CDS
        I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
        PGURUS
        SWAMY
        RAJIV MALHOTRA
        DAVID FRAWLEY
        STEPHEN KNAPP
        WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
        KONRAED ELST
        FRANCOIS GAUTIER
        THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
        SATYA NADELLA
        CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
        QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
        QUORA MODERATION TEAM
        KURT OF QUORA
        GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
        CHETAN BHAGAT
        ENTIRE BBC GANG
        PAVAN VARMA
        RAMACHANDRA GUHA
        MUKESH AMBANI
        RATA TATA
        ANAND MAHINDRA
        KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
        LAXMI NARAYAN MITTAL
        AZIM PREMJI
        KAANIYA MURTHY
        RAHUL BAJAJ
        RAJAN RAHEJA
        NAVEEN JINDAL
        GOPICHAND HINDUJA
        DILIP SHANGHVI
        GAUTAM ADANI
        DEANS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ TISS/ FTII

        JOHN BRITTAS
        KAMALAHASSAN
        ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
        CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
        DGPs OF ALL STATES
        GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
        PRESIDENT OF INDIA
        VP OF INDIA
        SPEAKER LOK SABHA
        SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
        CJI BOBDE
        ATTORNEY GENERAL
        ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
        ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
        LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
        ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
        RSS
        AVBP
        VHP
        MOHAN BHAGWAT
        RAM MADHAV
        ZOYA HASAN
        JAYATI GHOSH
        JAYRAM RAMESH
        PIYUSH GOYAL
        RK PACHAURI
        GRETA THUNBERG
        DILIP CHERIAN
        SANJAY R HEGDE
        IRFAN HABIB
        NIVEDITA MENON
        AYESHA KIDWAI
        SWARA BHASKAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        RANA AYYUB
        KAVITA KRISHNAN
        PRAKASH KARAT
        BRINDA KARAT
        SITARAM YECHURY
        D RAJA
        ANNIE RAJA
        SUMEET CHOPRA
        DINESH VARSHNEY
        PINARAYI VIYAYAN
        KODIYERI BALAKRISHNAN
        JOHN BRITTAS
        THOMAS ISAAC ( KERALA FINANCE MINISTER)
        SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
        NANDINI SUNDAR
        SHEHLA RASHID
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BIMAN BOSE
        MANIK SARKAR
        HANNAN MOLLAH
        MA BABY
        SURJYA KANTA MISHRA
        MOHAMMAD SALIM
        SUBHASHINI ALI
        BV RAGHAVULU
        G RAMAKRISHNAN
        TAPAN KUMAR SEN
        NILOTPAL BASU
        AK PADMANABHAN
        S RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI
        BUDDHADEB BHATTACHARYA
        NIRUPAM SEN
        K VARADARAJAN
        MOHAMMAD AMIN
        MK PANDHE
        HU XIJIN ( CHINESE GLOBAL TIMES EDITOR)
        DEAN BERKELEY UC
        DEAN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
        WENDY DONIGER
        AUDREY TRUSCHE
        SHELDON POLLOCK
        SRI SRI RAVISJANKAR
        SADHURU JAGGI VASUDEV
        BABA RAMDEV
        MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI
        K SUBBHARAYAN
        BINOY VISWAM
        TK RANGARAJAN
        SOLI BABY
        FALI BABY
        KATJU BABY
        SALVE BABY
        ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
        NALIN KOHLI
        GVL NARASIMHA RAO
        SAMBIT PATRA
        VIVEK OBEROI
        GAUTAM GAMBHIR
        ASHOK PANDIT
        ANUPAM KHER
        KANGANA RANAUT
        VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
        KIRON KHER
        MEENAKSHI LEKHI
        SMRITI IRANI
        PRASOON JOSHI
        MADHUR BHANDARKAR
        SWAPAN DASGUPTA
        SONAL MANSINGH
        MADHU KISHWAR
        SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
        GEN GD BAKSHI
        RSN SINGH
        E SREEDHARAN
        MOHANLAL
        SURESH GOPI
        CHANDAN MITRA
        THE QUINT
        THE SCROLL
        THE WIRE
        THE PRINT
        MK VENU
        MADHU TREHAN
        RAJDEEP SARDESAI
        PAAGALIKA GHOSE
        NAVIKA KUMAR
        ANAND NARASIMHAN
        SRINIVASAN JAIN
        SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
        VIKRAM CHANDRA
        NIDHI RAZDAN
        FAYE DSOUZA
        ZAKKA JACOB
        RAVISH KUMAR
        PRANNOY JAMES ROY
        AROON PURIE
        VINEET JAIN
        RAGHAV BAHL
        SEEMA CHISTI
        DILEEP PADGOANKAR
        VIR SANGHVI
        KARAN THAPAR
        PRITISH NANDI
        SHEKHAR GUPTA
        JAVED AKHTAR
        NASIRUDDIN SHAH
        KUNHALIKUTTY
        MAMOOTTY
        DULQUER SALMAN
        ADMIRAL RAMDAS
        KAVITA RAMDAS
        LALITA RAMDAS
        JOHN DAYAL
        KANCHA ILAIH
        TEESTA SETALVAD
        JEAN DREZE
        ARUDHATI ROY
        SHOBHAA DE
        JULIO RIBEIRO
        JAVED AKTHAR
        KUNHALIKKUTTY
        ASADDUDIN OWAISI
        FAZAL GHAFOOR ( MES )
        FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
        ANNA VETTICKAD
        DEEPIKA PADUKONE
        ARURAG KASHYAP
        ADVANI
        MURLI MNOHAR JOSHI
        KAMALAHASSAN
        VERNON GONSALVES
        VARAVARA RAO
        ARUN FERREIRA
        GAUTAM NAVLAKHA
        SUDHA BHARADWAJ
        ARUNA ROY
        GN SAIBABA
        SURENDRA GADLING
        MAHESH RAUT
        SHOMA SEN
        RONA WILSON
        SIDHIR DHAWALE
        NCERT
        EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
        AK ANTONY
        OOMMEN CHANDY
        PC GEORGE
        ALL KERALA MPs AND MLAs
        TAPAN SEN
        KAPIL SIBAL
        ABHI SEX MAANGTHA SINGHVI
        MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
        SANJAY JHA
        POONAWALA BROTHERS
        RANDEEP SURJEWALA
        ROBERT VADRA

        SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
    JEW ROTHSCHILD AND MAD MARX  RECOGNIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF MAD DARWIN TO THEIR MOVEMENT AND THEREFORE VIGOROUSLY DEFENDED HIM

    MARXs  STUPID “DAS KAPITAL” AND DARWIN’S  STUPID “ ORIGIN OF SPECIES” WERE THE ‘TWO GREATEST SCIENTIFIC CREATIONS OF THE CENTURY’ ( SIC) THANKS TO THE PROPAGANDA OF GERMAN JEW  ROTHSCHILD MONOPOLIZED MEDIA

    Communism teaches that by  ‘defending Darwinism, working people strengthen their defenses against the attacks of . . . reactionary outfits, and prepare the way for the transformation of the social order’, i.e. a communist revolution.

    At Marx’s graveside, Jew Engels spAke a eulogy  : ‘Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history..

    BRRAAAYYYYYYYYYYY

    Engels spAke --‘What they both celebrated was the internal rhythm and course of life, the one the life of nature, the other of society, that proceeded by fixed laws, undistracted by the will of God or men. There were no catastrophes in history as there were none in nature. There were no inexplicable acts, no violations of the natural order. God was as powerless as individual men to interfere with the internal, self-adjusting dialectic of change and development.’

    Marx felt that religion is not just an illusion: it had a deleterious social function, namely to distract the oppressed from the truth of their oppression and prevent people from seeing the harsh realities of their existence. 

    So long as the workers and the downtrodden believed their patient, moral behavior and sufferings would earn them freedom and happiness in heaven, they would allow themselves to be oppressed. 

    Marx concluded that workers would change their perception of reality only when they realized that there is no God, no afterlife and no good reason not to have what they want now even if they have to take it from others.


    Communism teaches that by  ‘defending Darwinism, working people strengthen their defenses against the attacks of . . . reactionary outfits, and prepare the way for the transformation of the social order’, i.e. a communist revolution.

    At Marx’s graveside, Jew Engels spAke a eulogy  : ‘Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history..

    The solution, Mad Marx argued, was to abolish religion, which then would allow the poor to openly revolt against their ‘oppressors’ (the land owners, the wealthy, the entrepreneurs, et al.) and take their wealth away so the poor could enjoy wealth and fulfillment in this world. 

    Furthermore, since ‘the rich and powerful aren’t just going to hand these over, the masses shall have to seize them’ by force. ‘Marx’s eschatology, his materialistic philosophy of history is, for all practical purposes, a doctrine of permanent revolution, a doctrine which cannot but issue in periodic violence, terror and tyranny’

    AT THE END OF IT ALL WHAT DO WE SEE— AFTER THE COMMIE FOG CLEARED  ?

    JEW ROTHSCHILD STOLE THE WEALTH OF THE CZAR AND SIPHONED OFF THE WEALTH OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION, BY NOT ALLOWING PRIVATE PROPERTY..
    IT WAS ALL ABOUT STEALING..


    WAH RAAJAAH WAH !


    BELOW:  EVEN A RETARDED CHILD KNOWS THAT DARWINs FINCH THEORY IS BULLSHIT AND IT CANNOT BE APPLIED TO HUMANS



    JEW DARWIN SHOULD HAVE SHOVED HIS FINCHES UP HIS OWN CHRONS LADEN ASSHOLE, INSTEAD OF CONVERTING HALF THE PLANET TO ATHEISTS


    MAD DARWIN FOUND ONLY ONE FUCKIN' FINCH ON THE ENTIRE MAINLAND

    BAAAYE GAAD !  SWEAR !!



    JAI JAI FINCH... 

    PAAGAL DARWIN KA FINCH !



    NEXT TIME DARWIN MUST TAKE PAAGALIKA GHOSE AND SEARCH FOR EASTER FINCH EGGS ON GOOD FRIDAY..







    BELOW: DARWIN HAD PLAN B GASSED UP AND READY -- WITH BEETLES..





    HEY SAGARIKA GHOSE

    DARWIN FOUND SOME EASTER EGGS ( FINCH ) ON GOOD FRIDAY..

    YOU WANT ONE?

    YOU CAN SHARE IT WITH HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI.. EKKATTA KHAAANA.

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_21.html

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    SEND ABOVE COMMENT TO
    SAGARIKA GHOSE
    RAJDEEP SARDESIA
    AND ALL INDIAN JOURNALISTS AND MEDIA BARONS
    I&B MINISTER/ MINSTRY -- CENTRE AND STATES

    IAS EXAM QUESTION PAPER:

    HOW MANY CYLINDERS ? ...   2 / 6/ 8/ 12


    BELOW: MAAJI IS HAJAAAAAR THRILLED.. HER AKKAL KA DUSHMAN SON HAS COME OF AGE!    CHECK OUT THE CUNTS IN THE AUDIENCE..



    True Joke :--

    I has a senior by the name of Kaushalendar Gupta – a corny fellow


    He used to introduce himself as COW CYLINDER GUPTA



    Karl Marx is very aware of the propagandistic use of the term "science,"

    ROTHSCHILD ASKED MARX TO TERM DARWINs MAD THEORY OF EVOLUTION AS SCIENCE

    Economics is not a "science" in any meaningful sense of that term

    Engels gave Marx credit for extending Darwin's theory to the study of the inner dynamics and change in human society

    Marx drew on Lewis H. Morgan and his social evolution theory. Lewis H. Morgan was a contemporary of the European social theorists Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who were influenced by reading his work on social structure and material culture, the influence of technology on progress. Morgan is the only American social theorist to be cited by such diverse scholars as Marx, Charles Darwin, and Sigmund Freud.

    In 1881, Karl Marx started reading Morgan's Ancient Society, Contemporary European social theorists such as Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were influenced by Morgan's work on social structure and material culture, as shown by Engels' The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State (1884).


    Morgan does not mention Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, but Darwin referred to Morgan's work in his own. He is best known for his work on kinship and social structure, his theories of social evolution,

    THINKERS CRY   “THE PROBLEM OF MARXISM IS THAT IT DOES NOT TREAT HUMAN SOCIETY AS A CONTINUOUS GAME, INSTEAD, IT LOOKS ONLY AT CURRENT ROUND”

    BUT HEY—

    THAT IS EXACLY THE POINT!

    COMMUNISM WAS MEANT TO BE SHORT TERM. !

    AS SOON AS  ROTHSCHILD HAD STOLEN FROM THE NATIONAL VAULTS AND PEOPLEs HOMES , COMMUNISM  WAS MEANT TO DIE..


    KYA IDEA HAI SIRJEEE !



    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL FOUND ONLY ONE TYPE  OF COCKROACH ON INDIAN MAIN LAND

    BUT HE FOUND 12 TYPES IN LACCADIVE ISLANDS

    THIS SURELY MEANS  “GOD DOES NOT EXIST”..

    BOTH VADAKAYIL AND DARWIN ARE ON THE SAME FUCKIN' PAGE !

    TOBA  TOAHBAAAHHHH !


    COMMUNISM WANTED TO KILL THE LAWS OF KARMA..    KARMA IS QUANTUM PHYSICS .   IT AFFECTS EVERY HUMAN ON THE PLANET AND THIS MEANS NON-HINDUS TOO.




    Communism has as its foundation the concept of the socialist man who will always strive for the societal good instead of what he perceives to be in his own best interest.  like how a man would struggle and sacrifice for his own children ( provided they love him )   . 

    This is the reason why reeducation camps are mandated immediately after the communist obtain power and why they focus on education in general. 

    If NSA was a smart person by now he would have lined up all JNU/ JU/ TISS/ DU/ IIT commie professors ( naked with a string sown through their family jewels ) of social sciences who are in the payroll of Jew commies.. 


    ON SHIPS WE SHIP CAPTAINS HAD TO TAKE A COURSE IN “SOCIAL RESPONSIBILTY”  TO BE EMPLOYED..  

    I WAS VERY CLEAR ON THIS .. IN THE FIRST MEETING WITH ME CREW AND OFFICERS, I TELL THEM “ ON MY SHIP, WHAT I SAY IS LAW.. THERE IS NO LOK SABHA AND RAJA SABHA ON MY SHIP..  I HOLD VETO POWER.. WHEN I COMMAND HARD-A-PORT THERE IS NO ROOM FOR OTHER OPINIONS. “



    MY CREW LOVED TO HEAR MY GROUND RULES "YOU SHALL DO IT MY WAY"..   THEY ALREADY KNEW IT..  THEY LOVED TO BE COMMANDED BY A TOUGH GUY WHO ENSURED THAT THEY (WITH THEIR  MONEY ) WILL REACH HOME SAFE AFTER THE CONTRACT ... 

    THEY KNEW THAT THIS INDIAN CAPTAIN DOES NOT TAKE HIS CHILDREN TO THE POLICE STATION..   

    CAPTAIN KNEW THAT HIS CREW HAS COME ON BOARD PRIMARILY-- TO PUT BREAD ON THEIR TABLE BACK HOME..     AND FOR THIS END HE WOULD PUT HIS OWN HEAD ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK.. 

    THEY WERE SICK AND TIRED OF PANSY CAPTAINS WHO DANCED TO THE TUNE OF THEIR SHORE BOSSES..




    rajusundarJanuary 21, 2020 at 11:07 AM
    Dear captain

    You are more apt for roles did by mohanlal in devasuram or narasimha. Truly macho. Do you know that your blogs concepts are being cherry picked by many new gen mallu directors??.
    1. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/07/elvis-presley-i-did-it-my-way.html

      TRUMP CHERRY PICKED THE SONG ABOVE FOR HIS PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL VICTORY DANCE

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB15QrbgCcs

    Marx, was a self-proclaimed philosopher.. Rothschild ensured that no ordinary man could make head or tail of his Das Kapital theory.. 

    But Rothschild’s media proclaimed Marx as this planet’s no 1 thinker..  

    Reason?  

    Rothschild wanted to steal the wealth of 60% of this planet via communism. He did it and how!’

    In Russia people could not even own their own pillows.. Whatever their forefathers had handed down generations ( like gold and jewellery ) had to be given to Rothschild,  lest they die in the icy gulag..

    200 million people would die..

    I ASK MY READERS—

    WHO WAS SMARTER JEWESS HELENA OR JEW ROTHSCHILD?.. 

    TELL ME VIA COMMENTS COLUMN.

    HELENA WAS A ONE PERSON SHOW..


    ROTHSCHILD WAS A FAMILY SHOW RUNNING DOWN CENTURIES.    

    NOBODY ON THE PLANET KNEW THAT ROTHSCHILD RULED INDIA— NOT THE QUEEN OR BRITISH PARLIAMENT.

    ROTHSCHILD CONVERTED INDIA FROM THE RICHEST ON THE PLANET TO THE POOREST IN 250 YEARS FLAT..




    Jewess Commie Emma Goldman is also known as Red Emma, a diehard supporter of Katl Marx..   

     This Rothschild agent  went to USA to spread communism.  She was deported back to Russia as she triggered violent labour strikes.   

    Emma praised Rothschild’s Bolshevik revolution  as "the most fundamental, far-reaching and all-embracing principles of human freedom and of economic well-being".

    Emma Goldman wrote that  the economic system of capitalism was incompatible with human liberty..

    "The only demand that property recognizes," she wrote in Anarchism and Other Essays, "is its own gluttonous appetite for greater wealth, because wealth means power; the power to subdue, to crush, to exploit, the power to enslave, to outrage, to degrade." 

    She also argued that capitalism dehumanized workers, "turning the producer into a mere particle of a machine, with less will and decision than his master of steel and iron.

    Jew Rothshild controlled both violent anarchists ( Red Emma ) and non-violent anarchists ( anarcho pacifist Gandhi )

    Red Emma founded and controlled Anarcha-feminism in USA. She led the lesbian movement. She was the main tool for Jew Rothschild to break the harmony of the American family.  She supported adultery  and was a an advocate of free love in schools and a strong critic of marriage. 

    In 1897,  Emma baby wrote: "I demand the independence of woman, her right to support herself; to live for herself; to love whomever she pleases, or as many as she pleases. I demand freedom for both sexes, freedom of action, freedom in love and freedom in motherhood" 


    Emma  was the first and only woman, indeed the first and only American, to take up the defense of homosexual love before the general public

    in numerous speeches and letters, she defended the right of gay men and lesbians to love as they pleased ( perform deviant sex ) and condemned the fear and stigma associated with homosexuality

    SHE WAS A MEAN BITCH OF THE FIRST ORDER ..

    HENRY FORD DID NOT HAVE THE BALLS TO UTTER THE DREADED WORD "  R  "

    OTHER THAN ANDREW JACKSON,  NO US PRESIDENT HAD THE GAAND MEIN TATTI TO UTTER THE DREADED WORD "R"




    US President Andrew Jackson the seventh President of the United States (1829–1837) was a man with balls of steel -- the only man who took on Rothschild and won.

    He was fearless and tough , he challenged those he did NOT like, to a shooting duel and killed several of them.

    In 1835, Andrew Jackson paid off the entire US national debt, the only time in U.S. history that has been accomplished .

    the current US debt is 23.2 TRILLION US DOLLARS.


     watch the debt clock running .

    why do you think USA is scared of India today ?

    when Andrew Jackson took over US presidency, he knew that 20% of his presidential staff and white house staff were under Rothschild's pay roll.

    So our man implemented the theory of rotation in office for political appointments .   By the end of his first four years, Andrew Jackson had dismissed more than 20% of the Federal employees who were working at the start of his first term, -- all Rothschild stooges .

     In the first two years itself he sacked more than 2,000 of the 11,000 employees of the Federal Government.

    NOW YOU CAN IMAGINE HOW MANY OF OUR MINISTERS , MPs, MEDIA, JUDICIARY, IAS BABUS ETC ARE LOBBIED UP BY THE COMMIE JEWISH DEEP STATE .

    On January 30, 1835, Rothschild tried to have Andrew Jackson assassinated . When Jackson was leaving a funeral an assassin named Lawrence from England aimed a pistol at Jackson, which misfired.   Lawrence immediately pulled out a second pistol--but our man Jackson pounced on him with a cane and beat the living shit out of him.

    Andrew Jackson had told his vice president, Martin Van Buren on the spot , "The Jewish bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me...."

    After a couple of weeks Andrew Jackson found out the plot and he gave a speech.

    "You Rothschild bankers are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning".

    Andrew Jackson was not happy with the Rothschild central bank. When Rothschild’s agent banker Biddle sought to renew the bank’s charter in 1832, President Jackson put his re-election bid on the line and vetoed Congress’ attempt to renew the charter. He vetoed it for three reasons. The bank was becoming a monopoly; it was unconstitutional, and it was a grave danger to the country by having the bank heavily dominated by Jewish foreign interests

    Rothschild immediately put the screws on Andrew Jackson for refusing to allow him to re-establish the Rothschild central bank by shrinking the US money supply. He did this by refusing to make loans. By so doing, he upended the economy and money disappeared. Unemployment ran high. Companies went bankrupt because they could not pay their loans.

    The nation went into a panic depression. Rothschild felt he could force Jackson to keep the central bank. So confident was he that he publicly boasted that he had caused the economic woes in America. Due to his foolish bragging, Andrew Jackson became a folk hero and the central bank died. It died until its re-establishment in 1913.

    Andrew Jackson was unique for the times in being elected by the voters, without the direct support of a recognized political organization. He vetoed the renewal of the charter for the Bank of the United States on July 10, 1832.

    When Jackson came to the Presidency in 1828, Rothschild’s banker agent Biddle was in full control of the Federal government’s central bank. This was not the first time that a central bank had been established.

    Twice before, first under Robert Morris, and then under Alexander Hamilton, had a central bank been tried, but in both cases it had failed because of fraudulent actions on the part of the Rothschild bankers who were in control.

    After the War of 1812, a central bank was tried again, and it was in this third attempt that we find R agent banker Biddle.


    INDIANS WENT TO UGANDA AS INDENTURED LABOUR SLAVES.. 


    PRETTY SOON ROTHSCHILD INJECTED INDIAN CRYPTO JEWS ( MOSTLY  GANDHIs KATHIWARI JEW CLAN )  INTO UGANDA AS HIS FRONTS TO LOOT UGANDAs WEALTH ..

    THESE INDIANS TOOK OVER THE ECONOMY OF UGANDA AND MADE THE SONS OF THE SOIL, THE “NOT SO BRIGHT”  BLACK MAN THEIR SERVANTS.. 

    “BRIGHT” IDI AMIN KICKED OUT ALL THESE BLOOD SUCKING INDIANS.. NOT OF RICH INDIAN CAME BACK TO INDIA..THEY ALL MIGRATED TO UK.




    JEWISH COMMIE US JUDGES  SPONSORED MEXICO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS,  JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS SUPPORTED BY ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY / BENAMI MEDIA WANT ILLEGAL MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS FROM BANGLADESH AND ROHINGYA CRIMINAL MUSLIMS TO BE ABSORBED BY INDIA..

    THIS IS WHAT A NORWEGIAN PATRIOT  ANDERS BEHRING BREIVIK  DID TO A JEWISH MARXIST ELITE INDOCTRINATION SUMMER CAMP ( FOR CHILDREN ) AT OTOYA ISLAND NORWAY.. 




    FOR SPEAKING ABOUT “VALUES” , “FREEDOM” AND “ SEAMLESS BOUNDARIES “  THE CRYPTO JEW PM OF NORWAY JENS STOLTENBERG  ( A DEEP STATE MEMBER ) WHO SUPPORTED ILLEGAL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION TO NORWAY WAS PROMOTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO BE THE NATO SECRETARY GENERAL.

    BELOW: AS SOON AS MUSLIMS GET A TOEHOLD ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET, THEY CLAMOUR FOR SHARIA LAW..    MOST MUSLIMS DONT REALIZE THAT THEIR LEADERS ARE CRYPTO JEWS.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/07/cracked-heels-and-prayer-marks-capt.html




    COMMUNISM IS THE MANIFESTATION OF A DEEP PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SPIRITUAL WEAKNESS IN HUMAN NATURE, SEETHING IN ENVY. THE DESIRE FOR COMMUNISM—I.E., THE NEED TO BE SHIELDED FROM ONE’S OWN FAILINGS —LIVES IN THE DARK SIDE OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL.


    THE MARXIST DEMONS CONCEIVED BY FALSEHOOD (BY JEW ROTHSCHILD) , AND NURTURED BY IGNORANCE ( KOSHER MEDIA /  JUDGES IN DEEP STATE PAYROLL), MUST BE EXORCIZED BY TRUTH ( BLOGGERS ON INTERNET ).

    The horrible Russian GULAG system had over half a million in camps in 1933; since 1936, there were over a million convicts, reaching numbers of 2,8 million by the beginning of the 1950s. The atrocities of the system were obvious, especially for foreign onlookers.

    ‘A concentration camp is better’ - Lenin

    Even at the beginning of the Soviet state, the Bolsheviks They met with strong civil resistance, sometimes bursting into rebellions like the Tambov rebellion of 1920-1921, where over 50,000 peasants were interred and tens of thousands were killed by the Red Army.

    The sunk Tambov Rebellion ,  was one of the largest and best-organized peasant rebellions challenging the Bolshevik regime during the Russian Civil War. This rebellion was sunk by Jew Rothschild’s media

    It developed into a prolonger guerrilla war against the Red Army, Cheka units and the Soviet Russian authorities. It is estimated that around 3.1  lakh people  were arrested and around 32,000 shot dead during the suppression of the uprising. It took until the middle of 1922 until the province came to rest completely

    Jew Mikhail Tukhachevsky ( Red Napoloen ) was asked to crush the rebellion by scorched earth tactics.

    The Red Army  used chemical weapons to finish off the rebellion , this is kept as a big secret by Jew Rothschild monopolized media and peer reviewed historians
    The Red Army used heavy artillery and armored trains and also engaged in the summary execution of civilians

    War criminal Jew Mikhail Tukhachevsky  would be rewarded . He later served as chief of staff of the Red Army from 1925 through 1928, Achieving the rank of Marshal of the Soviet Union in 1935 at the young age of 42.

    He was awarded the Order of Lenin on 21 February 1933

    He would be awarded in kind by German Jew Rothschild in Germany in Jan 1936

    Stalin shot this bastard for treason  ( he was fixed by Stalin for being a threat to his power base ).. 

    Tukhachevsky's family members all suffered after his execution. His wife, Nina Tukhachevskaya, and his brothers Alexandr and Nikolai, were all shot. Three of his sisters were sent to the Gulag. His underage daughter was arrested when she reached adulthood and remained in the Gulag until the 1950s Khrushchev thaw.


    BELOW: COMMIE LEADERS ( BEGGARS ) LIVED IN MORE OPULENCE THAN THE CZAR


    THE GAME IS OVER !


    WE KNOW THE INDIAN COMMIE BEGGARS ( UNFIT TO CLEAN EVEN SHIT POTS ) WHO DRESSED UP AS KINGS  






    Ho atyarchar pe gussa
    Bharstachar pe gussa
    Social pe hai gussa
    Parshasan pe hai gussa
    Badhte zulam pe hai gussa
    Haan thamta nahi hai yeh gussa
    Na lena bachega na dena bachega
    Sabka hisaab barabar karega
    Aawaz se govinda..govinda..
    Sara shehar khada hai
    Govinda..govinda..
    Govinda..govinda..
    Jo sarkar kahega shehar karega

    COMMUNISM/ SOCIALISM IS THE BIG LIE OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. WHILE IT PROMISED PROSPERITY, EQUALITY, AND SECURITY, IT DELIVERED POVERTY, MISERY, AND TYRANNY. 

    EQUALITY WAS ACHIEVED ONLY IN THE SENSE THAT EVERYONE WAS EQUAL IN HIS OR HER MISERY --  BY PULLING DOWN PEOPLE, NEVER TIDING UP. 

    COMMIES HAD NOTHING, YET THEY WERE EAGER TO SHARE IT WITH EVERYBODY


    THE REPUDIATION OF COMMUNIST CONDUCT IS NOT ENOUGH.  COMMUNIST DEFEATS WILL BE TEMPORARY IF THE ERRORS OF MARXIST DOCTRINE ARE NOT EXPOSED.  

    A NEW GENERATION WILL BE SEDUCED BY THE DOCTRINES, AND COMMUNIST KILLING WILL RECOMMENCE.   IT ALL BOILS DOWN TO COMMIE JEWS STEALING ( LITERALLY MAKING MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR)  AND GRABBING WORLD POWER.


    THE DELUSIONAL DOCTRINES OF ROTHSCHILDs BLOOD RELATIVE JEW KARL MARX BEAR THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO MASS MURDER THAT THE MALARIAL PARASITE DOES TO THE DISEASE OF MALARIA.



    THE REASON THAT COMMUNISM IS THE GREATEST EVIL IS SIMPLE:  COMMUNISM IS THE GREATEST ENEMY OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY EVER INVENTED.   EVERY COMMUNIST POLICY—FROM THE MINIMUM WAGE TO SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE TO RENT CONTROL—IS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE AND THWART PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. 

    THEIR LEADERS, THE CRYPTO JEWS CONTROL THESE “MINDLESS ANIMALS” WHO ARE SEDUCED BY “HEAVEN OF FREEDOM SANS NARROW DOMESTIC WALLS ” VERSES OF ROTHSCHILD’S AGENT RABINDRANATH TAGORE.



    In the long run, Communism/ Socialism has always proven to be a formula for tyranny and misery.

    A pyramid scheme is ultimately unsustainable because it is based on faulty principles. Likewise, collectivism is unsustainable in the long run because it is a flawed theory. 

    Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with fundamental principles of human behavior.

    The failure of communism/ socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives and innovation.


    IN A CAPITALIST ECONOMY, INCENTIVES ARE OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE. MARKET PRICES, THE PROFIT-AND-LOSS SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTING, AND PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT, INTERRELATED SYSTEM OF INCENTIVES TO GUIDE AND DIRECT ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR. CAPITALISM IS BASED ON THE THEORY THAT INCENTIVES MATTER!


    UNDER SOCIALISM, INCENTIVES EITHER PLAY A MINIMAL ROLE OR ARE IGNORED TOTALLY. A CENTRALLY PLANNED ECONOMY WITHOUT MARKET PRICES OR PROFITS, WHERE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY THE STATE, IS A SYSTEM WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE INCENTIVE MECHANISM TO DIRECT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. BY FAILING TO EMPHASIZE INCENTIVES, SOCIALISM IS A THEORY INCONSISTENT WITH HUMAN NATURE AND IS THEREFORE DOOMED TO FAIL. SOCIALISM IS BASED ON THE THEORY THAT INCENTIVES DON’T MATTER!


    .
    Communism is an imposter created philosophy that masqueraded as science and functioned as an ideology with blinkers on. 

    Communism was a  political organization with ulterior motives and vested interests that placed the state as an absolute over the individual, while advocating elimination of states and fulfillment of all human beings.

    Communism is now dead and it is as appetizing as a stinking drowned cat . 

    Communism failed because mad Darwinism and mad Marxism masquerade as   science created by intellectuals.

    Communism gave itself the cloak of the science of Dialectical Materialism, rather than a philosophy.  Hence, it refused to see itself as a theory about the truth, but insisted that it was the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

    Atheist Communism  was mindless doctrinaire and dogmatic like messiah religions . Marxism  insisted on its exclusive correctness, could not detect its own errors.  Communism fucked  itself by its blind attachment to its own fucked up vision

    Marxism refused to learn from its mistakes or from the insights of others.  We have Kerala commie Pinarayi Vijayan learning from his Sabarimala mistakes of the previous year.. 

    Discovery was inhibited by rabid dogma.  In the commie system, intellectual and political, received guidance not from  scientists but from casuists sans commonsense . 

    Commie reasoning sought to resolve moral problems by extracting or extending theoretical rules from a particular case, and reapplying those rules to new instances— something like the STUPID stare decisis of our own chootiya Illegal collegium Indian Judiciary..

    Past rulings ( sans context and perimeter ) of stupid judges were used as an addendum to the Indian constitution by slimy and unsound reasoning,

    Marxism, touted by Rothschild’s monopolized media as THE true science was in fact rabid  ideology of a class of closed-minded kosher rulers.

    The dialectical method was too inflexible and dogma laden.

    Marxism was unable to encounter ideas or events outside of  dialectical opposition.  It consumed without understanding. While Marxism appeared dynamic at the surface of the murky waters and ever on the move, at bottom it was static and totally out of step. 

    It got itself into a red knicker twist because of the fixity of its morbid thinking.

    The Marxist insights about dialectical movement in history, in  action, and in thought, became distortions of reality because of unswerving insistence on absolute science—we are the best !.

    Communism reserved all the truth for itself, it  relegated all other philosophies, sciences, and theories to the status of ideology, that is, a set of doctrines instrumental to a party, class, or state.

    Marxism failed to understand the nature of people whom they tried to control .   Marxism painted itself into a red corner.. It was a bullshit philosophy, pretending to be science, that ruled out real philosophy.

    Absolutism is the refusal to recognize alternatives. Graded absolutism of Marxism, is the stupid view that a moral absolute, such as "Do not kill", can be greater or lesser than another moral absolute, such as "Do not lie"

    The Communist dialectic made genuine dialogue impossible nay dangerous .  All answers other than its own had to be wrong or incomplete and hence punishable . Only Marxism  supposedly escaped ideology, as the true voice of the science of history.

    Communism, absolved from ideological function and  absolute in its knowledge, served as irresistible apology for the program of totalitarian and brutal commie states with heavy-handed propaganda, and masking in fancy intellectual  terms actions motivated by greed, pride, fear, and ignorance.

    Many unforgivable sins were committed in the name of Communism. Many brutal excesses, , are attributable to the figures in power, who would have covered their dastardly deeds with the terms  borrowed from whatever ideology was at hand. 

    They were beyond reproach..

    Today President Xi of China knows, if there is a war with India, he will be the first to hang. Chinese economy is a Ponzi scheme—nay – a bubble within a bubble

    Read both parts ..

    Rapid industrialization was paid for at the cost of millions of lives crushed.  Jew Mao’s  insistence on  such stupid  ideas as having workers manufacture steel in back  yards, while the crops went unharvested, led to the  starvation of 35 million people.

    Communism was just “not worth it” – apologies to Aishwarya Rai

    As a practice, Communism brought about a net loss of values. In sum, Marxism as theory opened itself too  easily to service as ideology for unbridled tyranny.  There were no checks and balances, as in democracy ..

    Those features of Marxism that attracted such sinister political  exploitation were íts delusion of absolute knowledge, its rejection  of freedom of the intellect , and its inclination toward authoritarianism.

    Communism cultivated the cult of personality.  What was the need to have such large statues of Lenin and Mao?

    It linked its  absolutism of knowledge with the authoritarianism of interpreters.

    Marx consulted history, Marxists consulted Mad Marx.

    Marxism periodically needed insights that went beyond Marx yet stayed within Marxism. Hence, everything  in Marxism had to be stretched without being corrected.

    Marxism would not have painted itself into a corner , has they rejected the absolutism of  Dialectical Materialism.—the mindless belief that  that ideas could arise, therefore, only as products and reflections of material conditions.

    Communism  opted to retain the absolute while revising it, to bow to Marx as the supreme authority while adding other prophets as sidekicks .

    Communism's fatal error was to  overrule the value of the individual by insensitive and impersonal  forces Persons don't count, according to Communism,  because they do not really exist. How could Jew Darwin be wrong? 

    You see, authentic human beings will only be produced when all the world has gone Communist, all the states, those instruments of oppression, have withered away, and every individual has been socialized to live in harmony with all others—looking at the red sunset

    The Golden Age of the social person lies in the future. And the only way to get to that future is through upheavals by the  militant masses. This bastard Marx was a killer. History must judge him so..

    The not-yet social person is but a cog in the machinery that obeys iron laws which eventually will  manufacture real persons who do not suffer oppression or inflict it.

    Every body except Indian commie leaders like Sitaram Yechury ad Brinda Karat know that people were virtual prisoners under Communism. They  had no access to the outside world.

    I have seen every commie nation and how people live

    What was done to them was  Hidden and Rothschild’s media did not report it . The internationalism of Communism was isolationist, its  solidarity was xenophobic.

    For the sake of the future humanity, present-day human beings  were regarded by Communism as dispensable.  The idea of being in the moment was never there.. 

    People were not ends in themselves  but merely means in history. Hence, as Communism  aims at universal liberation, it demanded complete obedience and self-sacrifice. It was sacrifice for commie ideology, not for the watan.

    While it paraded the vision of a world at peace,  it called for revolution and brutal injustice everywhere. While it denounced the  oppression of people by capitalism, it prepared to oppress the  capitalists and unfairly order around the rest of the people for the sake  of a new socialization.

    The  ruling nomenclatura commie elite class certainly would not allow  the proletarian masses to come to power by exercise of their  supposed rights, such as fair and open elections.

    In addition to  ownership of the means of production, the new pigs of “animal farm” bourgeois owned the  legislature, the courts, the police, the press, and even the ballot  box.

    Communism itself created a corrupted class of decadent rulers.  The error of the Marxists was to stick to Marx's dismissal of  liberalism as deceit.

    Ideas change reality as people are guided by them in their  action. Marx was mistaken in seeing ideas as only the product of  material conditions.

    Communism initially opposed human rights, as doctrine and as  institution, because it thought it knew better.

    Communism freely rode rough shod on liberalism in order o liberate el futuro— inshah allah.

    Communism brutally by way of whiplash  exercised its power against people, all in the name of its ideology  as a necessary path through history to the realm of human  fulfillment.   

    Several of the errors of Communism –misjudgment  of evolution within capitalism, inflexible theory of historical  process, ignorance of the power of ideas over institutions, and  self-deception concerning its own ideological functions- combined to contribute to the monstrous record of Communism

    Dissidents were declared mad and given chemical injections and surgical operations of brain to numb their minds permanently

    How could such dehumanization, oppression, and violation  occur on such a huge scale, given the passionate rejection of  injustice that pervaded the life and writings of the founder, Karl  Marx? 

    Marx was a means for Jew Rothschild to steal the wealth of the planet..Every thing was planned centuries in advance

    The paradoxical of Marxism was “ people of now really do not matter, because people of el fattichar future matter”.   BRAAAAYY

    The humane outcome demanded inhumane process, right ?.  BRAAAYY

    Killing was for the sake of peace.   BRAAAY .

     Slave labor contributed to liberation.   BRAAAYYY.

    Oppression of peoples will lead to solidarity.   BRAAAYYY

    Tyranny  is the servant of freedom.   BRAAAAY

    This is worse than nonsense; it is stupid. It is a blank check for inflicting the worst imaginable sufferings on human beings. The  bank against which the check is drawn

    Any crime may be committed for such an ultimate good, because somehow  they are not crimes, and the good, though guaranteed, is always  yet to come. It will come sooner than later, right?   BRAAAYYY

    The double doctrine of Marxism was "We crush people to uplift People !  BRAAAAYYYY.

    With its absolute commitment to a  final uplifting of all people, Communism had no inhibition to  its systematic crushing of any people.

     It did not hold itself  responsible to such liberal notions as human rights.

    Was it love of  humanity that led Communism to bloody its hands?

    Communism  was largely practiced with a disdain for humanity. After all Commies follow Darwin’s FINCH science, right?

    The cloak of  necessity and final outcome concealed the vicious enjoyment taken in inflicting suffering upon people at will.

    Because Marxism saw humanity as infinitely malleable, to be  reshaped by socioeconomic conditions, and without an inherent  core, such as dignity, human beings were pushed about like so  much living matter.

    The ends, fulfilled human  beings in society, required the rape of human souls along  the way, right. The doctrine of using people merely as means is a mean  doctrine, vile and self-contradictory. Nobody has ever put a finger on this.. thanks to Jew Rothschild’s peer reviewed media and historians..

    The noble end of humanity  for which Communists worked was at the same time worked  against by them in kicking the asses of humanity that had to kneel before  them.

    The goal was invisible, even if  thought to be inevitable. How could this planet’s no 1 thinker Marx be wrong?

    Digression:--

    HOW CAN SHIT BE THERE ON OXFORD STREET?
    once nehru's assistant was walking on oxford street .
    he saw shit lying on the asphalt .
    now- how can shit lie on honorable oxford street, bhaiyya -
    shit can lie on indian street ,but not oxford street , right ?
    so he bend down and smelt it.
    it smelt like shit.
    but then how can shit like on esteemed oxford street?
    so he pinched a piece of shit and felt in his fingers.
    the texture was of fresh shit-
    but then how can shit lie on world famous oxford street?
    so he ate a piece of shit .
    then he spit it out in disgust-- PTTTHHLEEEEOOOYYYYY !
    now he was cock sure it was shit.
    so he cried--
    THANK GOD I DID NOT STEP ON THIS MANGY SHIT - BACHCH GAYA SAALA !

    Communism did not lift up those it faced, though it  told them that they were being liberated. Communism made them  kneel for the sake of uplifting others: the future. On that sacred  altar, the commie Jew tyrant could sacrifice individual s and masses without  limit.

    The striking fact was that those who had endured Communism  were glad to get rid of it the moment they could.

    The spark of free choice triumphed

    Communism was rejected by the masses as it imposed unwarranted suffering, while its promises remained unrealizable. . History shall judge Communism as having been a crime against humanity.

     Marxism failed to foresee or check the corruption that comes with the victory of the Communist party in any state.

     Attachment to a noble vision  of the future is no guarantee against giving in to the evil temptations that surround those newly arrived to power.

    Absolute power is a license for absolute corruption. Just as the science of Dialectical Materialism was absolute, so were its interpreters.

    The private life of JEW  Mao, as recounted by his personal physician..


    The Communist ruling class was not held in check by care for  human dignity. It was not moderated by spirituality. It was  not criticized by philosophic freedom.

    Granted that its goals were  of the highest, the eventual good of all, yet the Communist party  elite Jew Nomenclatura gave priority to itself, making unassailable its control over every  aspect of society.

    Along the way, Communists, who were only  human, enjoyed their greater share of material goods. Greed was conjoined with the pleasure to be had in making others subject to  one's will.

    The Communist state  (always a contradiction in terms) facilitated corruption in  government and corruption by government. It had no correctives other than show trials and the firing squad. Communism, despite  its virtuous aims, seemed inevitably to become government by vice.

    The people who were  to be molded under Communism for the revolutionary march of  history chose against such history, they stepped out of the march,  and they asserted their identity based on their historical and  national heritage.

    The tables were turned when Marxist revolutionary history was overthrown by the history of the peoples  oppressed by Marxism.

    Communism erred in its suppression of spirituality. By  stamping out the "opium of the masses," the communists lost  their adherence and respect.

    Communism as the opium of the  bureaucrats had nothing to offer in place of this powerful dimension to human community. The popular witticism that atheistic Communism itself is a religion is bullshit..

    The centralized command economy was a coercive economy.

    It thereby condemned itself to production of inferior goods, to  corruption and inequity in distribution, and to disaffection of the  working classes.

    Communism, which arose in  protest against the alienation of the workers under capitalism, in  turn inflicted a hopeless alienation upon its workers.

    When given the option of moving toward a free-market  economy, those who had lived under Communism jumped at the  chance.  

    The economic incentive was a large component in that  quest for freedom which led millions of Germans in the Communist state of the German Democratic Republic to rush  over in 1989 to the capitalist state of the German Federal  Republic.

    The next year, without a shot, Germany was reunified.

    A command economy can only be efficient in the short run  The lack of incentive, initiative, and imagination means that long term progress is inhibited. Stagnation sets in.

    A c1osed market has  nowhere to go once it has produced what was its goal. An open market reinvigorates itself. It discovers new goals thanks to its  very process.   
    Competition leads to innovation and better products that are more easily accessible and at lower cost.

    The Communists stuck themselves with a  third-rate economy.  Communism was King Midas in reverse.

    Balls to socioeconomics. the social science that studies how economic activity  effects and is shaped by social processes-- how how societies progress, stagnate, or regress because of their local or regional economy, Marxism disabled itself from the start—it fell PHUTT on its face

    Communism could not be saved. It had so many faults  linked together that they could only be corrected by abandoning communism. Communism was not simply a system with some  errors; it was a totally erroneous system.

    It could not be salvaged other  than by closing one's eyes to the truth, silencing opposition, and  insisting that everything is INJIKKREW and was going according to the plan ..

    Communism fell due to the blindness of its thinking that  precluded corrigibility, a blindness coupled with disrespect for  the intrinsic worth of human beings.

    Communism fell from within—nay—imploded from within .

    It could not offer what it  claimed with certainty it would offer.

    The credit for  overcoming Communism, must be given, in the final irony, to the Communists themselves .

    Capitalism must not get the credit for the collapse of  Communism. To give such credit might increase the arrogance,  complacency, corruption, and insensitivity that can plague  capitalist systems.

    Progress in the world in terms of humane cooperation  requires that we ever be open to correcting our thinking and our  ways of interacting. Humanity reforms by learning from its  errors.

    THE COMMIE  STATE OWNS BUSINESSES ON BEHALF OF THE PROLETARIAN WORKERS, WHICH, IN EFFECT, MEANS THE GOVERNMENT OWNS A MONOPOLY.    

    IN COMMUNISM, CENTRAL PLANNERS REPLACE THE FORCES OF COMPETITION AND THE LAWS OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND THAT OPERATE IN A MARKET ECONOMY, AS WELL AS THE CUSTOMS THAT GUIDE A TRADITIONAL ECONOMY.    


    THERE ARE VERY FEW THINKERS ON THIS PLANET WHO CAN GLEAN THE KOSHER SLIME  OF BIG BROTHER JEW ROTHSCHILD  . THIS IS HOW BULLSHIT BOOK DAS KAPITAL BECAME THIS PLANETs NO 2 SELLING BOOK AFTER BIBLE.

    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL SAYS—BAN DAS KAPITAL IN INDIA..

    ABOLISH THE COMMUNIST PART OF INDIA AND JAIL THE LEADERS WHO HAVE FOOLED THE  PEOPLE .

    WE DON’T NEED THESE CUNTS IN INDIA..




    1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED--

      A CHARLATAN CALLED HIMSELF "KALKI BHAGAWAN " AND WAS CAUGHT WITH 400 CRORES OF UNACCOUNTED MONEY..

      AND THIS FELLOW HAS 14 MILLION FOLLOWERS WORLD WIDE.

      MOAN MOAN MOAN

      LISTEN

      WHY DOES IT TAKE A BLOGGER TO EXPOSE ROTHSCHILDs AGENT FREEMASON VIVEKANANDA , WHO HAS BEEN TOUTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD AS THE GREATEST HINDU SAGE --EVEN BIGGER THAN ADI SHANKARACHARYA?

      ##########################

      VIVEKANANDA SUPPORTED THE HEAVEN- HELL THEORY, PROPPED UP ALL FAKE DASAS/ RADHA / RAM KICKING PREGNANT SITA TO THE FOREST / 16000 GOPIKA LOVERS/ 330 MILLION GODS / BHAKTI MOVEMENT/ ANIMAL SACRIFICE IN TEMPLES/ DEVADASI TEMPLE WHORES/ SATI/ AGHORIS / BIGOT MANU LIES/ KAMASUTRA SEX/ BRAHMACHARYA SEMEN/ ASHWAMEDHA HORSE SACRIFICE/ FAKE EMPEROR ASHOKA/ FAKE ROTHSCHILDs MUTTS/ ISLAMIC CONVERSION OF HINDU MONUMENTS LIKE QUTAB MINAR-TAJ MAHAL- BABRI MASJID ETC.
      VIVEKANANDA DID NOT KNOW THAT HINDU GODS ( EXCEPT VISHNU MORTAL AVATARS PARASHURAMA/ RAMA/ KRISHNA/ AYYAPPA ) ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES .

      VIVEKANANDA WAS PART OF THE BRAHMO SAMAJ WHICH-

      REJECTED THE VEDAS
      REJECTED VISHNU AVATARS KRISHNA AND RAMA
      REJECTED TEMPLE WORSHIP OF SHIVA, VISHNU AND DEVI
      REJECTED KARMA , BE-BIRTH AND MOKSHA THEORY.

      VIVEKANANDA CONDONED HIS MASTER ROTHSCHILD –

      REPLACING VISHNUs NINTH AVATAR AYAPPA WITH FAKE PIG EATING/ PALI SPEAKING BUDDHA

      REPLACING MEMORY HOLDING WATER WIH ALCOHOL IN HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINES

      IMPALING ( MOST POTENT SYMBOL OF HINDUSIM ) EMPTY KALASHA KUMBHAM WITH A STICK UPSIDE DOWN AND STICKING IT OUTSIDE A WINDOW LIKE A SCARE CROW

      CREATING THE ELEVENTH GURU OF SIKHS BANDA BAHADUR WITH A HOLY BOOK GURU GRANTH SAHIB WRITTEN BY ROTHSCHILDs AGENT WHITE JEW WEARING TURBAN MAX ARTHUR MACAULIFFE .

      SOAKED OUR PURANAS WITH SEMEN


      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/02/mistakes-deliberate-or-inadvertant-in_7.html

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/mahamrityunjaya-mantra-most-potent.html

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/kathiawari-jain-jew-gandhi-and-kayastha.html


      WHAT ARE WE AS A ANCIENT CIVILIZATION WHICH DOWNLOADED THE VEDAS 400 CENTURIES AGO , WORTH?

      #################################

      WHO ARE ALL THESE PEOPLE WHOM WE WORSHIP TODAY LIKE SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR/ SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV/ BABA RAMDEV ETC -- WHOSE CHARAN KAMAL PM MODI KISSES ?

      WHY DID NOT ONE SINGLE HINDU OBJECT TO MODI IMPALING OUR NO 1 SYMBOL KALASHA KUMBHAM UPSIDE DOWN WITH A STICK-- AND TWEETING IT , WISHING ALL HAPPY GUDI PADWA?

      IF THIS GUJARATI FELLOW IS SO STUPID, HOW IS HE RULING INDIA?

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..























    1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/despite-protests-caa-will-not-be-withdrawn-amit-shah/articleshow/73481252.cms

      THIS CAA THINGY IS A BLESSING IN DISGUISE..

      THIS IS THE TIME TO WEED OUT TRAITORS IN FOREIGN PAYROLL.

      EVEN CAPT AMARINDER SINGH HAS TURNED OUT TO BE A TRAITOR-- A CLOSET KHALISTANI. HIS ANCESTORS WERE DARLINGS OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.. SIKHS SUPPORTED ROTHSCHILD IN 1857 ..

      AMIT SHAH-- USE HD CAMERAS TO PROFILE DESH DROHIS.. EVEN FRIENDS AND RELATIVES MUST BE PROFILED.. DO NOT LET SHAHEEN BAHG BECOME ANOTHER HONG KONG TYPE PROTEST ..

      CANCEL VIAS OF ALL FOREINERS WHO SUPPORT THESE ANTI-CAA PROTESTS.

      TRAITOR BABUS IN MINISTRIES MUST LOSE THEIR PENSIONS..WE KNOW WHO THEY ARE ..THEY HAVE BEEN CARELESS.

      WE ASK AJIT DOVAL-- FORM A SEPARATE INTELLIGENCE WING FOR DESH DROHIS IN FOREIGN PAYROLL. WHY HAVE YOU BEEN SO LENIENT WITH FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs IN INDIA?..

      WE ASK MODI/ AMIT SHAH -- GIVE STRICT INSTRUCTIONS..INFLICT SVERE PAIN ON TRAITORS..

      WE NEED TO FORM MILITARY COURTS-- TO HANG A FEW JUDAS JUDGES / MEDIA PERSONS / NAC MEMBERS ..

      WE ASK LAW MINISTER/ ATTORNEY GENERAL-- REVISE THE CONSTITUTION..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/we-people-are-done-with-illegal.html

      I ASK MY READERS TO SPREAD THIS COMMENT BY WHATS APP.

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
    1. https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-we-find-much-Hjras-in-Kerala-like-in-other-states

      AT SCHOOL MY FRIENDS TOLD ME ABOUT HIJRAS .. THEY TERMED THAM RAAMAN KALYAANIS..

      I NEVER SAW THEM TILL I LEFT FOR MUMBAI TO DO MY CADETSHIP FOR TWO YEARS WITH 250 CADETS..

      I SAW THEM AT ATRFFIC JUNCTION WHILE ON SHORELEAVE

      THEN I CAME BACK ON BOARD AND ASKED MY FRIENDS-- THEY TOLD ME ALL SORTS OF STORIES..THAT IF A CHILD IS BORN IN NORTH INDIA, HIJRAS WOULD COME TO CHECK THE GENITALS, AND IF THE CHILD WAS A HIJRA THEY WOULD FORCIBLY TAKE AWAY THE BABY..

      AND THE BABY IS NORMAL, THEY WOULD DEMAND MONEY FOR A WASTED TRIP AND IF NOT SATISFIED-THEY WOULD LIFT THEIR SAREE AND SHOW THE PRIVATE PARTS..

      I ASKED ONE FRIEND-- WHAT DID YOU SEE

      HE SAID-- I JUST SAW A HOLE ..

      MANY RADERS HAVE ASKED ME ABOUT KING EDWARDS WIFE WHO WAS A HERMAPHRODITE.. THEY ARE CONFUSED, HOW HIS WIFE COULD FUCK THE HUSBAND..

      HERMAPHRODITES HAVE A LARGE DONG--

      THEY HAVE TWO HOLES UNDERNEATH THE PRICK --ONE A VAGINA ( PLAY PEN --NOT NURSERY ) AND OTHER THE ASSHOLE..

      THE PRICK IS ACTUALLY AN ENLARGED CLITORIS.. THE IRREVERENCE IS WHEN THEY ORGASM, THEY EJECT SEMEN..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/11/great-romance-and-curse-of-kohinoor.html

      THE PICTURE BELOW MUST BE TAKEN AS SCIENCE NOT PORN..

      THE ORIGINAL CONFESSIONS IN CHURCH WERE TO CREATE A SEXUAL DATABASE OF HERMAPHRODITES FOR UNMARRIED HOMOSEXUAL CATHOLIC VATICAN PRIESTS ( CANON 21 ) ..

      THE HERMAPHRODITE WOMAN (UTRIUSQUE SEXUS, WITH A DONG ) HUMPS THE MAN, AND INJECTS SEMEN INTO HIS ASSHOLE.. GOD DOES NOT ALLOW THIS, REVERSAL OF ROLES FOR LUST ..

      CATHOLIC CLERGY IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE POPE TO MARRY. HOMOSEXUAL MEN FOUND FRUITFUL REFUGE REFUGE IN CATHOLIC CHURCHES AS CLERGY..


      CANON 21, "Omnis utriusque sexus", commands every HERMAPHRODITE Christian who has reached the years of discretion to confess all ITS sins at least once a year to ITS priest. This was more of a political ploy..

      UTRIUSQUE SEXUS MEANS HERMAPHRODITE.. A PERSON WITH PENIS ( WITHOUT BALLS ) AND VAGINA ..

      THESE UNFORTUNATE PEOPLE WERE THEN BLACKMAILED FOR SEX BY CATHOLIC ELITES WHO ENGAGED IN SUCH DEVIANT PLEASURES ..

      CONFESSIONS WERE 100% SEXUAL IN NATURE AND WEALTHY GAY CLIENTSS USED TO WAIT OUTSIDE THE CHURCH..

      THE SEXUAL ORIENTATION OF THIS HERMAPHRODITE WAS WHAT WAS CONFESSED AS SOMETIME IT COULD SATISFY AN ANAL SEX HUMPING GAY-- OR EVEN A PERVERTED STRAIGHT AS IT HAD A VAGINA.. .

      LATER THIS CONFESSION WAS EXTENDED TO BOTH MALE AND FEMALE GENDERS.. WHY SHOULD A WOMAN CONFESS TO A STRANGER MALE PRIEST ?

      JESUS WAS FIRST DEPICTED ON A CROSS ONLY 1148 YEARS AGO.. JESUS CHRIST WAS COOKED UP AT THE FIRST COUNCIL OF NICEA BY ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTIN THE GREAT IN 325 AD..

      EVEN THE ITALIAN TOURIST GUIDES IN ROME KNOW THIS..

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

    BELOW: THIS BLOGSITE EMPATHIZES WITH THESE UNFORTUNATE HERMAPHRODITES --   BUT NEVER WITH A HOMOSEXUAL - AS 99% OF THEM ARE DANGEROUS PEDOPHILES..



    BELOW:   HERMAPHRODITES WERE IN GREAT DEMAND BY ANAL SEX RECEIVING CATHOLIC CLERGY.. AND BY HUMPING GAYS TOO..  

    AS YOU CAN SEE, BALLS ARE MISSING.. STILL THEY PRODUCE SEMEN..

    I HAD ONE OF MY FRIENDS ( A EUROPEAN ) SCREWING A HERMAPHRODITE IN MOROCCO. HE THOUGHT "IT" WAS A FEMALE, WITH ONE LEG AMPUTATED..  AT THE THIGHBONE.. 

    WHEN SHE UNDRESSED HE FOUND OUT THE TRUTH.. 

    THIS WOMAN WAS NOT A WHORE.. DURING SEX SHE WAS MOANING WITH PLEASURE AND HER STUMP LEG WAS FLAPPING FURIOUSLY LIKE A DOGs TAIL..

    HE SHOWED ME HER PHOTO.. SHE WAS RICH AND HAD SEX ONLY WITH STRAIGHT MEN NOT FOR MONEY BUT FOR BIOLOGICAL NEED .. SHE LOST HER LEG IN AN ACCIDENT..


    BELOW: ANAL SEX RECEIVING KING JEW EDWARD VIII WAS ASKED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO ABDICATE..  HE NEEDED A KING WHO WOULD FOLLOW ORDERS.. 

    JEWESS WALLIS SIMPSON HUMPED HER HUSBAND, BOTH LOVED EACH OTHER 





    BELOW:  IF CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WERE TO MONETIZE HIS BLOGSITE AND SELL HIMSELF , EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT KALKI BHAGWAN, SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR , SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV, BABA RAMDEV  ETC  ( WHO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT SANATANA DHARMA) WOULD BE LEFT FAR BEHIND COLLECTIVELY

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Bhagavan

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravi_Shankar_(spiritual_leader)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaggi_Vasudev

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramdev





    1. JEW ROTHSCHILD NEEDED ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF LEATHER FOR WW1 AND WW2 WHICH HE TRIGGERED TO CARVE OUT THE STATE OF ISRAEL..

      INDIA PRODUCED LEATHER FOR ALL ALLIED ARMIES WORLD WIDE..

      JEW ROTHSCHILD BUILT MOSQUES AND MADRASSAS AT EVERY TANNERY.. JEW ROTHSCHILD EMPLOYED CRYPTO JEW CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES TO CONVERT HINDU DALITS INTO MUSLIMS..

      FIRST HE CREATED HUNDREDS OF FAKE HINDU MUTTS TO HARASS THE POOR HINDUS.

      WHEN THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA THERE WERE ONLY 4 ORIGINAL MUTTS, WHOSE PONTIFFS WERE VEDA ORAL ROUTE KNOWING KERALA NAMBOODIRIS .

      BY THE TIME HE LEFT INDIA THERE WOULD BE MORE THAN 1000 HINDU MUTTS, LED BY PONTIFFS WHO WERE MOSTLY ANAL SEX RECEIVING HOMOSEXUALS , CLAIMING TO BE BRAHMACHARIS..

      JEW ROTHSCHILD NEEDED LEATHER- - HORSE SADDLES, BRIDLES, BOOTS, HOLSTERS ETC… 70% OF INDIAs HUMPED COWS WERE DECIMATED ..

      HE BUILT HUNDREDS OF TANNERIES WHERE RIVERS MEET THE SEA , TO AVOID POLLUTION -- AT THREE PLACES WEST PAKISTAN/ BANGLADESH AND KANPUR….

      WHY KANPUR ?.. BECAUSE IT HOUSED THE WORLDs LARGEST LARGEST MILITARY CANTONMENT…

      GERMAN JEW ROTHCHILD CREATED SHABBY WEE SUNNI MOSQUES ATTACHED TO EVERY TANNERY.. ..

      HE FITTED THESE MOSQUES WITH LOUD SPEAKERS IMPORTED FROM GERMANY TO WAKE UP THE WORKERS BEFORE DAWN , RATHER THAN TO PRAY TO AZAN CALL. ..

      HE ALSO BUILT MADRASSAS WITH FREE FOOD ….. CRYPTO JEW MULLAHS CONVERTED DALITS TO MUSLIMS ENMASSE ..WHO WOULD MAN THESE TANNERIES ….

      WHY DID PAKISTAN AND BANDLADESH HAVE MUSLIM MAJORITY BEFORE INDEPENDENCE IN 1947?.... ONLY BECAUSE JEW ROTHSCHILD CREATED TANNERIES AT THE SEA END OF RIVERS INDUS/ GANGES TO AVOID POLLUTION.. .

      GANGES SUPPLIED WATER FOR HIS SHIPS .. AS THE WATER DID NOT GET SPOILT..

      GANDHI RECRUITED 13 LAKH ( 1.3 MILLION ) INDIAN SOLDIERS IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR ..– OUT OF WHICH 111000 ( 1.11 LAKH ) INDIAN SOLDIERS WERE KILLED ….

      GANDHI RECRUITED 25 LAKH ( 2.5 MILLION ) INDIAN SOLDIERS IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR... OUT OF THIS 243000 ( 2.43 LAKH) SOLDIERS WERE KILLED……

      MAJORITY OF INDIA IS WOKEN UP AT 0445 HRS IN THE MORNING BY EAR SHATTERING AZAN CALLS FROM MOSQUES WHICH AFFECT OUR REM SLEEP.

      THE FIRST AZAN MUST NOT BE EARLIER THAN CIVIL TWILIGHT START TIME ( CENTRE OF SUN MUST BE LESS THAN SIX DEGREES BELOW HORIZON ) ... IN INDIA WE HEAR MORNING FAJR AZAN 75 MINUTES BEFORE SUNRISE.. THIS IS NOT ALLOWED AS PER KORAN. ...

      THE FIRST AZAN CANNOT BE MORE THAN 48 MINUTES BEFORE SUNRISE...

      MORE THAN 81% OF THE PEOPLE OF INDIA AND WOKEN UP IN THE MORNING BY BLARING AZAN CALLS BY LOUDSPEAKER FITTED ON MOSQUES AT AN UNEARTHY HOUR OF 0430 IST.. WHY IS THIS ALLOWED?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBASeEiAxDo

      WHEN CHILDREN ARE DEPRIVES OF REM SLEEP, THEY FORGET WHAT THEY STUDIED THE PREVIOUS WEEK..

      ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS IN CONTEMPT OF "WE THE PEOPLE" AND THE CONSTITUTION..

      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/we-people-are-done-with-illegal.html

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..


    https://www.sacnilk.com/quicknews/Chhapaak_2020_Day_12_Box_Office_Collection?hl=en

    I ASK MY READERS

    BOYCOTT CHHAPAAK..

    KALANK TO INDIAN WOMENHOOD DEEPIKA PADUKONE WAS SITTING IN THE FRONT ROW OF AIB ROAST AND GUFFAWING ( LIKE A DONKEY WHO HAS SEEN FRESH SHIT ) AT EVERY FILTHY ANAL SEX JOKE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ADoZ0CnV34

    THE AUDIENCE IS PACKED WITH NOUVEAU RICHE--

    CLASSLESS / CULTURELESS SCUM, BORN IN CHAWLS AND WHOSE MOTHERS WERE SLUTS..



    BELOW: KANNUR MALAYALAM IS SPECIAL..  ONCE MY WIFE AND I WENT TO A LAMP SHOP . SHE WANTED TO DONATE A LAMP TO THE NEAREST TEMPLE..  SHE CHOSE THE BIGGEST LAMP.. 

    THE SHOPKEEPER SAID " I HAVE BIGGER LAMPS"

    MY WIFE ASKED  "EADTHOOO"

    THE SHOPKEEPR REMARKS  " NINGAL KANNUR AANE ELLAY?"






    TO BE CONTINUED -




    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..

    COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 9 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil

    $
    0
    0


    THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 8 , BELOW--






    THE POWER OF ROTHSCHILD MONOPOLIZED MEDIA IS APPARENT IN WHAT HAPPENED TWO DAYS AGO.

    AT THE HOLOCAUST ANNIVERSARY, ALL DELEGATES CRIED ONLY OVER “SIX MILLION JEWS” DEAD..

    NOT A WORD WAS TOLD ABOUT ROMANI GYPSIES OR THE MILLIONS OF GERMAN POWs EXTERMINATED AFTER THE END OF WW2.



    JEWS KILLED WERE ANAL SEX RECEIVING JEWS KILLED BY ZIONIST JEWS.. HITLER WAS A JEW..



    Marxism is the ultimate in Utopian fantasy—a delusion of morbid mind.    The commies cried, --  until man obtains this higher level of social responsibility man will continue to be self centered and absorbed. 

    So so so-- This is where the centralized and powerful state becomes a necessity both as a means of eliminating private property and capitalism and as a means of controlling the very thought processes of people.


    We saw where communism landed up all over the planet—in the shit hole.. People refuse to even spit on Communism and commie leaders today.. It is not worth the effort..


    In the nature versus nurture debate communism recognizes only the later and therefore everything that is read, seen, or heard must be controlled as nothing can be allowed to interfere with the state’s creation of the socialist man.

    The problem of course is that the perfect communist society is never created, it is an impossibility, and the state not only continues but becomes more powerful and totalitarian with the entire economy becoming centralized and planned and all individual initiative anesthetized..

    Communism is based on a un-natural fantasy as to the nature of man and man’s ability to change his fellow man.


    In Marx’s mind, shared ownership leads to better production, which in turn leads to a more balanced economic system, if the communistic “Encampment” even has an economic system.

    Communism comes from the root word: Community, and the -ism variation of this, results in: The Idea of the Community - the community works as a collective, over the individual.

    Because of extreme clannishness Jews have thrived under a collective system like the Jewish ghettos of Europe ..   They wont allow any person of any other faith into their enclave.

    Same with clannish and selfish Parsis in Mumbai,  holed up in a walled fortress Cusrow Baug in Colaba , built i a prime real estate area with Opium money..  



    If any Parsi marries a non-Parsi he  can kiss his comfortable home inside this Parsi ghetto ( has 500 homes ) goodbye..  


    They keep re-producing within themselves and this causes an average Parsi to go bonkers and look like a piece of shit by the time he hits the age of 50.


    Commie Jew Joseph Weydemeyer called Marxism as “dictatorship of the proletariat”.. in reality “ beggars dressed up as kings”.. In Marxist philosophy, the term "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie" is the antonym to the term "dictatorship of the proletariat".

    He was a friend of Marx and was involved in the writing of the manuscript of The German Ideology.The German Ideology  is a set of manuscripts written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in May 1846..The text in German runs to around 700 pages

    In The Communist Manifesto (1848) Marx and Engels said that "their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions Marx expanded upon his ideas about the dictatorship of the proletariat in his short 1875 work, Critique of the Gotha Program

    He became a member of the League of Communists and from 1849 to 1851 headed its Frankfurt chapter.  Weydemeyer formed a tiny organization, the first Marxist organization in the United States, formed in the summer of 1852. 

    The group, called Proletarierbund, won the attention of German immigrants with the organization of a meeting on March 20, 1853, in New York, where eight hundred German Americans assembled in Mechanics Hall and founded the American Workers League.

    The ‘dictatorship of the proletariat,’  was Marx’s idea of a ‘step’ towards Communism. The first step was a revolution that removed the current governing body from power, the next was replacing that governing body with a powerful dictatorship that would maintain order while putting the economic system of Communism into action. 

    After a long period of time, this dictatorship would be disbanded, and a utopia would then be established without a central governing authority (hence anarchy) but rather, a paradise where everybody shares resources, land, and the means of production equally, with no social or economic statuses. This was Mad Marx’s dream for the future of the world.  However, that it never came true.

    Marx’s utopia falls PHUTTT on its face. The moment its achieved and people realize that there is no central authority compelling them to work and view others as equal, that moment is when the first seeds of dissent of Marx’s utopia are planted and civil war can occur, causing the reestablishment of states.

    Compare East and West Germany to see why communism failed.. i have seen both sides till the Berlin wall came down..

    The Eastern commie Bloc portrayed the Berlin Wall as protecting its population from fascist elements conspiring to prevent the "will of the people" from building a socialist state in East Germany.

    The Berlin Wall fell on 9 November 1989.

    I was in Hamburg when the Berlin wall came down.. all Germans on both sides of the wall were happy..


    Helmut Kohl, the West German chancellor, began negotiations with the Soviets and the East Germans to return Germany to single nation status. Kohl paid the Kremlin some $60 billion to get Soviet troops to leave German soil. The two Germanys signed a formal reunification treaty on Aug. 31, 1990

    Berlin  had been a symbol of Nazi Germany and all of the Allies wanted a piece of it. Thus, West Berlin also became an island of freedom in communist East Germany. The city, with a total of 3.3 million residents, was the hotspot of the Cold War


    The Jewish deep state wants North Korea to have a crypto Jew ruler..so that the rare earths of North Korea can be stolen.





    People say that  communism fails because it is imposed by force.   It would be more exact to say that communism IS force.  

    Communism denies the right to private property, it thereby robs individuals of the product of their labor, and makes them slaves to those who control the state. It is inseparable from the use of force. 

    It is also inseparable from state-sanctioned mass-murder. To deny a man's right to property is to deny his right to life. If you can take the bread he earned from a starving man's hands--which communists have done more than once--he has no right to life.  

    More than 200 million people died under communist regimes in the 20th Century—yet Jews keep moaning about “Six Million Jews” killed by Hitler ghadi ghadi..  .   Hitler was a Jew and an agent of Jew Rothschild..

    Many of them died due to forced starvation when the state diverted food from their region in order to subdue them. Others died when the state put them in camps to "re-educate" them, and others were simply shot.


    People don’t fail—they are true to themselves—ideologies fail..

    There was no true independent judicial system in Commienations . Anyone who got caught up in the legal system could be brutally abused

    Dictatorships are very chaotic and inefficient because you have to keep giving a cut to those who support you, do favours etc

    It’s all about clinging on to power, how can you build an equal society and share the wealth when led by a dictator who has to give all the money to his supporters and the wealthy to stay in power?


    Who made President Xi of China ruler for life?   The people of China?

    Read both parts of the post below--



    All we have seen is Communism used as front for Dictatorships. What many thought was Communism was in fact Despotism in the guise of Communism. 

    Whatever crushed individuality is despotism.. Commie idealism is the despot of human thought— it was “believe it or else”..


    Communism is not a failed ideology, it works pretty damn well in your family, can and has worked in very small  societies tightly knit like having blood connections of narrow religious sentiments like the clannish Amish in USA

    The  Amish of USA are German crypto Jews  The Amish are known for simple living, plain dress, and reluctance to adopt many conveniences of modern technology. 

    The Amish do not educate their children past the eighth grade, believing that the basic knowledge offered up to that point is sufficient to prepare one for the Amish lifestyle 

    Almost no Amish go to high school, much less to college. In many communities, the Amish operate their own schools, which are typically one-room schoolhouses with teachers (young unmarried women) from the Amish community. 

    The Pennsylvania Dutch are not Dutch at all as stupid Hilly Billy Yanks think . The word Dutch is a corruption of "Deutsch" or German, of which they speak an ancient dialect. 

    Ohio has the largest Amish population, followed by Pennsylvania and Indiana. Amish life is governed by the "Ordnung," a German word for order. 

    Most Amish groups forbid owning automobiles, tapping electricity from public utility lines, using self-propelled farm machinery, owning a television, radio, and computer, attending high school and college, joining the military, and initiating divorce.


    The Indian Hindu joint family system, where close blood relatives lived under one roof harmoniously for millenniums is envied by the whole world..  This is the wonder of spirituality which only Sanatana Dharma provides..

    The greatest thing mankind will ever accomplish is making communism work on a large scale, that is when we ascend as a species.  Like the deeply spiritual Hindu Essenes with high soul frequency who wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls.




    In Communist regimes you have no rights, no incentives to work hard, no freedom, no land, no nothing.   Besides Communist rulers are sadist and lethal. Communism brings nothing but oppression, and poverty to the masses.


    Communism is the worst idea the world has ever produced.  Why?  Because it simply is based upon the fact that no matter how hard you work, or how much brilliance you contribute , whatever the other lazy dimwit person earns, you will earn the same. 


    Anarcho-communism is a political philosophy and anarchist school of thought which advocates the abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour and private property (while retaining respect for personal property, along with collectively-owned items, goods and services) in favor of common ownership of the means of production, direct democracy, and a horizontal network of workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

    Anarcho-communism developed out of radical socialist currents after the French Revolution  created by Jew Rothschild so he can steal





    Commies brainwashed with stupid ideology will never understand that the capitalist system allows a worker to choose his employer and to start his own company.  

     This results in a competition for labor among capitalists, leading to higher wages, better working conditions and lower profits. In other words: capitalism has a tendency to move away from the conditions in which the communist revolution would occur.

    Only stupid people become Commies.   You wanna sit between cunts ?- go for a commie conference in Bengal or Kerala.



    Firms produce things because consumers want to buy them. The distinction between use value and exchange value is a false dichotomy.

    Use value  refers to a product's utility in satisfying needs and wants as afforded by its material properties.  Exchange value thus becomes simply the price for which a good will trade in a given market which is identical to what Marx refers to as price.

    Exchange-value is the quantitative aspect of value, as opposed to “use-value” which is the qualitative aspect of value, and constitutes the substratum of the price of a commodity.

    Relative prices reflect the incremental value of goods and services as a function of the technology it takes to produce them and the preferences of consumers who purchase them.

    A commodity is any good or service ("products" or "activities") produced by human labour and offered as a product for general sale on the market.  Some other priced goods are also treated as commodities, e.g. human labor-power, works of art and natural resources, even though they may not be produced specifically for the market, or be non-reproducible goods.

    Value and price are not equivalent terms in economics, and theorising the specific relationship of value to market price is bullshit

    In Marx's theory, a commodity is something that is bought and sold, or exchanged in a market.

    It has value, which represents a quantity of human labor.[6] Because it has value, implies that people try to economise its use. A commodity also has a use value and an exchange value.

    It has a use value because, by its intrinsic characteristics, it can satisfy some human need or want, physical or ideal.  By nature this is a social use value, i.e. the object is useful not just to the producer but has a use for others generally.
    It has an exchange value, meaning that a commodity can be traded for other commodities, and thus give its owner the benefit of others' labor (the labor done to produce the purchased commodity).

    Price is then the monetary expression of exchange-value, but exchange value could also be expressed as a direct trading ratio between two commodities without using money, and goods could be priced using different valuations or criteria.

    According to the labor theory of value, product-values in an open market are regulated by the average socially necessary labour time required to produce them, and price relativities of products are ultimately governed by the law of value.

    Labor is an input. So is capital, land, managerial expertise, entrepreneurial initiative, and technology. Each is compensated in accord with its marginal productivity.

    Economies are dynamic, not static. Equilibrium is perpetually in flux; inefficiencies arise.  None of this is to suggest that free markets seamlessly solve all problems. But neither is it the case that profit is the root of all evil. Profit is simply the compensation for risk-taking by “capitalists.”

    Profit is not theft. It is compensation for those who put capital at risk to start and run businesses.  To see profit as a pile of gold hoarded by dragon Smaug is a remarkable error of economic reasoning.

    The transformation of a labor-product into a commodity (its "marketing") is in reality not a simple process, but has many technical and social preconditions. 
    These often include the following ten  main ones:--

    The existence of a reliable supply of a product, or at least a surplus or surplus product.
    The existence of a social need for it (a market demand) that must be met through trade, or at any event cannot be met otherwise.
    The legally sanctioned assertion of private ownership rights to the commodity.
    The enforcement of these rights, so that ownership is secure.
    The transferability of these private rights from one owner to another.
    The right to buy and sell the commodity, and/or obtain (privately) and keep income from such trade
    The (physical) transferability of the commodity itself, i.e. the ability to store, package, preserve and transport it from one owner to another.
    The imposition of exclusivity of access to the commodity.
    The possibility of the owner to use or consume the commodity privately.
    Guarantees about the quality and safety of the commodity, and possibly a guarantee of replacement or service, should it fail to function as intended.
    The transformation of a labor-product into a commodity (its "marketing") is in reality not a simple process, but has many technical and social preconditions. 
    These often include the following ten (10) main ones:--

    The existence of a reliable supply of a product, or at least a surplus or surplus product.
    The existence of a social need for it (a market demand) that must be met through trade, or at any event cannot be met otherwise.
    The legally sanctioned assertion of private ownership rights to the commodity.
    The enforcement of these rights, so that ownership is secure.
    The transferability of these private rights from one owner to another.
    The right to buy and sell the commodity, and/or obtain (privately) and keep income from such trade
    The (physical) transferability of the commodity itself, i.e. the ability to store, package, preserve and transport it from one owner to another.
    The imposition of exclusivity of access to the commodity.
    The possibility of the owner to use or consume the commodity privately.
    Guarantees about the quality and safety of the commodity, and possibly a guarantee of replacement or service, should it fail to function as intended.

    Thus, the "commodification" of a good or service often involves a considerable practical accomplishment in trade. It is a process that may be influenced not just by economic or technical factors, but also political and cultural factors, insofar as it involves property rights, claims to access to resources, and guarantees about quality or safety of use.

    In absolute terms, exchange values can also be measured as quantities of average labour-hours. Commodities which contain the same amount of socially necessary labor have the same exchange value. By contrast, prices are normally measured in money-units. For practical purposes, prices are, however, usually preferable to labour-hours, as units of account, although in capitalist work processes the two are related to each other (see labor power).

    The seven basic forms of commodity trade can be summarised as follows:--

    M-C (an act of purchase: a sum of money purchases a commodity, or "money is changed into a commodity")
    C-M (an act of sale: a commodity is sold for money)
    M-M' (a sum of money is lent out at interest to obtain more money, or, one currency or financial claim is traded for another. "Money begets money.")
    C-C' (countertrade, in which a commodity trades directly for a different commodity, with money possibly being used as an accounting referent, for example, food for oil, or weapons for diamonds)
    C-M-C' (a commodity is sold for money, which buys another, different commodity with an equal or higher value)
    M-C-M' (money is used to buy a commodity which is resold to obtain a larger sum of money)
    M-C...P...-C'-M' (money buys means of production and labour power used in production to create a new commodity, which is sold for more money than the original outlay. "The circular course of capital")

    The hyphens ("-") here refer to a transaction applying to an exchange involving goods or money; the dots in the last-mentioned circuit ("...") indicate that a value-forming process ("P") occurs in between purchase of commodities and the sales of different commodities. Thus, while at first merchants are intermediaries between producers and consumers, later capitalist production becomes an intermediary between buyers and sellers of commodities. In that case, the valuation of labour is determined by the value of its products.

    The reifying effects of universalised trade in commodities, involving a process Marx calls "commodity fetishism," mean that social relations become expressed as relations between things; for example, price relations. Markets mediate a complex network of interdependencies and supply chains emerging among people who may not even know who produced the goods they buy, or where they were produced.

    Since no one agency can control or regulate the myriad of transactions that occur (apart from blocking some trade here, and permitting it there), the whole of production falls under the sway of the law of value, and economics becomes a science aiming to understand market behaviour, i.e. the aggregate effects of a multitude of people interacting in markets. 

    How quantities of use-values are allocated in a market economy depends mainly on their exchange value, and this allocation is mediated by the "cash nexus".

    In Marx's analysis of the capitalist mode of production, commodity sales increase the amount of exchange-value in the possession of the owners of capital, i.e., they yield profit and thus augment their capital (capital accumulation).

    In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, any product has a labor-value and a use-value, and if it is traded as a commodity in markets, it additionally has an exchange value, most often expressed as a money-price … 

    We are then told that ‘a use value or useful article’ has ‘value only because human labour in the abstract has been embodied or materialized in it’…; so that use value is value as before defined plus utility of the product.

    Having grasped this conception, the student of Marx is startled to learn, two pages later, that ‘a thing can be a use value, without having value,’ as air, &c. (but why call this Use value, when value is absent?) and that ‘lastly, nothing can have value without being an object of utility,’ because ‘if the thing is useless so is the labour contained in it; the labour does not count as labour, and therefore creates no value.’

    The most fundamental flaw in Marx's theory of value is the premise that the value of goods is determined by their cost of production alone.. 

    But hey, the value of a diamond is the same whether it was found by accident or whether it was found as a result of a thousand days of a miner's labour.   Like I said before , sometimes Marx was high on LSD and could not think for nuts

     In this modern age Das Kapital is totally irrelevant. The people who push this stupid book must be shot with their own shit

    The model becomes obsolete in the context of the modern knowledge economy, where the commodity being traded is principally intellectual property.  

    When I employ someone to write me an iPhone app, the value of it relates almost entirely to the demand which is subsequently generated for it. If I pay my developer $1500 to write the app and it takes him a week, then I promote it and sell it to a million people for a dollar each, was his labour worth a million dollars? 

    Or was most of the value in the idea I had and my skill in selling it?   If I fail to sell it at all, was his labour therefore worthless?

    Marx's theory of value  does not attribute any value to the risk taken by the entrepreneur. The entrepreneur risks his capital, time and reputation in order to provide a stable wage for the employee.

    Consider a Silicon Valley startup in which the developers are paid a good wage over a period of several years to work on an application or website which generates no revenue. If the venture can monetize then the entrepreneur may gain a huge payout, but it is also highly likely that the venture will fail.

    Eventually the capital will all be burned and the workers will be made redundant, but not until they have enjoyed a considerable period of gainful employment producing something of no realizable value.

    Engel’s father was a cloth mill owner.. His contributions related to a Capitalist being a millowner.

    Marx proposed that only labour could add value. The corollary of this is that labour-intensive industries should return higher profits than less labour-intensive industries, but there is no evidence to support this.   Indeed, in the modern economy, and perhaps ironically as a consequence of Marx's work, the reverse is more likely to be true.

    Marx has shifted his goal posts at will..

    At his starting point: in the opening pages of Kapital, Marx starts off saying that when two things are exchanged, it is because they are of equal value, and then proceeds to derive his doctrine form that fallacious starting point.

    When two things are exchanged it is because there is a double inequality of value.   Value is subjective, and both people value what they are getting in the exchange more than what they are giving up.  Marx’s vision was in runnel mode with blinkers on.

    Marx knew perfectly well that the labor theory of value could not be a complete account of value, which is why, on the very first page of Capital, he adds the qualifier "socially necessary" ( when he was less high on LSD ) , so the value of commodities is determine by the amount of socially necessary labor value. 

    This is necessary because otherwise goods produced by slower workers would supposedly be worth more.

    So so so-- what determines what is socially necessary ?

    Is it something like ILU ILU ?



    Prices do not converge on labor values. Marxian economists to this day talk about this as the "transformation problem", implying that it is some minor unsolved niggle

    In 20th-century discussions of Karl Marx's economics, the transformation problem is the problem of finding a general rule by which to transform the "values" of commodities (based on their socially necessary labour content, according to his labour theory of value) into the "competitive prices" of the marketplace.

    Marx’s failure to develop a consistent theory of long-run equilibrium prices on the basis of his labor theory of value.. in deriving “prices of production” that equalize profit rates across industries, Marx neglected  to transform input values into prices of production because he was high on LSD again
    .
    Once Marx’s derivation is corrected by simultaneous pricing of the inputs, so the story goes, it is no longer true that the sum of prices = the sum of values and that total profit = total surplus value; only one of these two equalities can hold, but not both. 

    Moreover, under the corrected transformation the aggregate or average rate of profit in price terms is not regulated by the value rate of profit, and the latter becomes redundant.

    Marxist economists have responded to this transformation problem in three ways, which at times have been combined in complex and even contradictory fashion.

    One approach is to discount the importance of the problem of market price determination relative to the qualitative insights and explanatory power still obtainable from Capital’s other analyses. 

    In this view, Marx’s treatments of such important phenomena as industrial development, exploitation, inequality, unemployment and economic crises are not irreparably damaged by his failure to properly complete the value-price transformation.

    A second response is to revise Marxist economics by jettisoning the labor theory of value, using the methods of neoclassical or Sraffian modeling. In this way, it is hoped that the strengths of Marx’s class-based and dialectical analysis can be maintained and further developed without the embarrassing analytical inconsistency revealed by the transformation problem.

    A third response has been to try salvaging the consistency of the labor theory of value as a framework for long-run equilibrium price determination through various new revisions of Marx’s transformation procedure.

    The transformation problem is actually a non-problem. Marx did not “neglect” to transform the inputs from values into prices of production; in reality such a transformation of input costs is not necessary or appropriate given Marx’s method of analysis.

    The real source of the inconsistency in the transformation problem lies in the use of inappropriate assumptions and modeling techniques to interpret Capital. Marx’s analysis is internally consistent given his method, his purpose, and his crucial recognition of the necessity of money as a representative of value under capitalism.

    How is macroeconomic production and accumulation of surplus value consistent with the conservation of value in exchange? Marx’s answer, set out in Volume I of Capital, is that in labor power capitalists find a commodity uniquely capable of producing new value through its expending of new labor in production.

    This value added by living labor power is not limited by the value of labor power itself, as determined by the value of the commodities necessary for workers’ historically and physically determined subsistence. Surplus value results from the difference between the value created by workers in production and the value of the commodities purchased with workers’ wages.

    Marx’s  insisted that total value and surplus value are determined on the macroeconomic level prior to the microeconomic formation of prices of production, and that the aggregate value quantities are not modified by the prices of production.

    The very fact that modern capitalism has highly variable organic compositions of capital and strong competition means that Marx should have seen from the beginning that there was no transformation problem. 

    Marx could easily have stated this in volume 1. There was no need to defer a non-existent pseudo-problem to volume 3. There was no need for Engels to announce a competition in his preface to volume 2 of Capital asking readers to try and solve the transformation problem, because there was no such problem. 

    Marx made his mistakes on depreciation-- he did not see that not only immediate labour, ‘living labour’ in his terminology, but prior labour used to create future value, in creating capital goods, could be a source of value and surplus value – profit.  

    Marx did not dispute that fixed capital goods do not transmit value to products – he says they do explicitly several times in Capital I.  What Marx held falsely was this was exactly offset by depreciation so the net value product of past labour accumulation was zero.

    Marx wrote that depreciation acts as a cost to be added to the value of products.
    Marx wrote that Capitalists must set up a fund to cover the depreciation so that when the machine is fully worn out a new one can be replaced.

    Marx assumes that the level of depreciation is equal to the level of value transferred to the final product and that this sum is equal to the depreciation fund, so that net the two cancel out and so fixed capital, when considered on the basis of the economy has a whole, supplies no net addition to value.


    Engels held dogmatically that value theory proved that only living labour could create value


    Nothing has any intrinsic value, nothing at all. The only value anything non-human has is the value some human places on it.Value exists within a human mind, not an external object.   Marx definitely did not understand, so his theory of value was wrong.  Marx,  was trying to analyze something that did not exist.


    a village bumpkin named Marx was told by his mother to sell their only duck as there was no bread in the house--

    while he was going skippety skip to the fair-- he saw a fair girl giving him the glad eye--

    she looked at this bulging crotch and said-- what a nice duck!

    he stopped and said-- "if mE can fuck you, Ya can take this duck"

    they fucked-- he gave her the duck-- the girl wanted an encore-- so she said

    "if you fuck me once more, i'll give you , your duck back"

    while he was fucking her again-- the blessed duck wandered off and got run over by a truck-

    seeing him despondent, she said —“ ok, i'll give you twenty dollars for the 2nd fuck"

    the bumpkin goes home hoppety hop-- his mother sees him with the dead duck under his arm

    she cried " what ever happened . don’t give me you usual meandering replies..  tell me in brief so that I can understand !!"?

    the bumpkin says -- let me put it this easy way--

    A  FUCK  FOR  A  DUCK
    A  DUCK  FOR  A  FUCK
    NOW  I  HAVE  TWENNY  BUCKS
    AND  A  FUCKED  UP  DUCK


    In Marxian economics, economic reproduction refers to recurrent (or cyclical) processes. Marx viewed reproduction as the process by which society re-created itself, both materially and socially.

    Economic reproduction involves:--

    the physical production and distribution of goods and services,
    the trade (the circulation via exchanges and transactions) of goods and services,
    the consumption of goods and services (both productive or intermediate consumption and final consumption).
    the reproduction of voluntary and involuntary social relations, involving competition and cooperation (including the social relations of the class hierarchy).

    Karl Marx modeled the circulation of capital, money, and commodities in  Das Kapital to show how the reproduction process that must occur in any type of society can take place in capitalist society by means of the circulation of capital.

    Marx distinguishes between "simple reproduction" and "expanded (or enlarged) reproduction".  In the former case, no economic growth occurs, while in the latter case, more is produced than is needed to maintain the economy at the given level, making economic growth possible. 

    In the capitalist mode of production, the difference is that in the former case, the new surplus value created by wage-labour is spent by the employer on consumption (or hoarded), whereas in the latter case, part of it is reinvested in production.

    As an approach to studying economic activity, economic reproduction contrasts with equilibrium economics, because economic reproduction is concerned not with statics or with how economic development gravitates towards an equilibrium, but rather with dynamics—that is, the motion of an economy. 

    It is not concerned with the conditions of a perfect match between supply and demand under ideal conditions but rather with the quantitative proportions between different economic activities or sectors that are necessary in any real economy so that economic activity can continue and grow. It is concerned with all the conditions for that, including the social and technical conditions necessary for the economic process. 

    Reproduction economics does not assume that society is kept in balance by market mechanisms.

    In Marx's model, the output in an accounting period is normally always higher in value than the input. This is what Marx believed capitalists to be in business for: to produce a product sold at a higher value than the sum of input costs, thus generating profit. The profit in Marx's theory is not an "input" (it is not part of the capital advanced), but a business result, the yield of capital on an investment.

    In Marx's view, economic reproduction in any society has five main features:--

    the production of reproducible products (goods or services) replacing, maintaining, or adding to the stock of society's physical assets
    the physical maintenance of the (working) population and their dependents through household consumption
    the reproduction and growth of the total population, including procreation and childrearing

    the reproduction, enforcement, and maintenance of social relations, in particular the relations of production that characterize the social hierarchy, and property rights
    the maintenance and reproduction of trading and distribution relations (the systems, institutions, and organizations enabling market trade and non-market allocation of resources)

    Marx's argument is that by producing an output value the equivalent to their own labor cost plus a surplus value (or gross profit) appropriated by capitalists, waged workers accomplish many of the processes involved at the same time.

    According to Marx, in a capitalist society, economic reproduction is conditional on capital accumulation.   If workers fail to produce more capital, economic reproduction begins to break down. 

    Therefore, economic reproduction in capitalist society is necessarily expanded reproduction and requires market growth. Capital must grow, otherwise the whole process breaks down. Thus, economic growth is not simply desirable but also necessary in capitalism, not just because of population growth, but for commercial reasons.

    Marx did not go into detail about how capitalist business reshapes, reorganizes, and restructures the mode of consumption so that it becomes more profitable. He concerned himself primarily with the capitalist mode of production, not with the capitalist mode of consumption..

    Marx did not analyze the effects of human capital—that is, the skills and knowledge lodged in the physical bodies of workers, and the very large sums of money invested into education systems..

    the stock of skills and knowledge in the economy can represent a very large tradable value, which can profoundly influence economic relationships, insofar as workers can increase their income because they possess specialized skills and knowledge. 

    Considerable money is spent on education and research and development in developed capitalist countries.

    In his theory of capital, Marx failed to consider the importance and weight of the non-capitalist production activities that must occur to sustain capitalist production (a significant component of which is household labour; see below). He was primarily concerned to show that the reproduction of society as a whole could in principle be accomplished by means of the accumulation of capital.

    Marx failed to systematically theorize the impact of demographic effects on economic reproduction,

    Marx did not analyze in any detail the effect of taxation and state expenditures on the reproduction process. Marx did not analyze in detail the depletion of natural resources by capitalist production, where the depletion involves non-reproducible goods, or living organisms that are wiped out. 

    If land is exhausted or becomes infertile, or if it is devastated by a natural disaster, or if the yield of mines, forests, and fisheries becomes too low, production can no longer continue. After a series of cycles of capitalist reproduction, environments may emerge that are no longer inhabitable by human beings because they are incapable any longer of sustaining life.

    For Marx, the production and consumption of society are both held by one another in a balance that necessitates reproduction.. Capitalism is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production.

    In Marx’s Capital, he defines simple reproduction as both the reproduction of base capital for the capitalist and the reproduction of labor power for the worker. Both reproductions are important to not only the survival of each individual, but, Marx argues, for society as a whole.

    Marx says, “no society can go on producing, in other words no society can reproduce, unless it constantly reconverts a part of its products into means of production, or elements of fresh products.”

    For Marx, the production and consumption of society are both held by one another in a balance that necessitates reproduction. “A society,” says Marx on page 711, the second sentence of the chapter devoted to simple reproduction, “can no more cease to produce than it can cease to consume.” Reproduction of this kind, i.e. simple reproduction, is a combination of consumption and production.

    The whole Das Kapital river runs into one single sea: the production / reproduction model.

    Value, as a result of human efforts may be present in two ways: present work and past work.

    What gone wrong on marxian explanations is not accounting past work (which includes intellectual work)...

    Marx, saw the "troubled waters" beneath the theory and prefer to stay dry on the bridge of generality.

    To save "the model" was more important than such details as market clearances to him.

    the prices of goods and services in a market is based on Supply and Demand (economics), not how long or hard labor had to work to produce it.    If the Labor Theory of Value were valid then a buggy whip would command a price in a world mostly without buggies.

    The Labor Theory of Value was cooked up to prove how the Big Bad Capitalists were robbing the honest Sons of Toil blind and stripping them naked. The mad theory of Marx killed more than 200 million people


    Mad  Marx, argued that changes in technology, and specifically productive technology, are the primary influence on human social relations and organizational structure, and that social relations and cultural practices ultimately revolve around the technological and economic base of a given society.

    Technological determinism has been summarized as 'The belief in technology as a key governing force in society’

    Technological determinism is a reductionist theory that assumes that a society's technology determines the development of its social structure and cultural values. ... Marx's position has become embedded in contemporary society, where the idea that fast-changing technologies alter human lives is pervasive.

    "The Handmill gives you society with the feudal lord: the steam-mill, society with the industrial capitalist" (The Poverty of Philosophy, 1847—Karl Marx)

    Jews embraced communism like no other ethnic or religious group in the west.  After all almost all these commie philosopher cunts were Jews.

    After the war, in 1949, the American Communist Party  which numbered less than 60,000 members was 70% Jewish.  These Jews did not have the interests of the nation , they were all traitors who had only extremely clannish Jewish interests in mind.. Rothschild’s media will never talk about this naked truth

    During the Popular Front period of the 1930s, the Communist Party USA famously adopted as its slogan “Communism is twentieth-century Americanism.” But for communist Jews, being Red was a way of asserting their radical difference, rather than their right to belong in American society.

    Rothschild created Jewish organizations like ADL and AIPAC to protect the wicked nay evil Jews.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Defamation_League

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Israel_Public_Affairs_Committee

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_lobby_in_the_United_States

    Commie Jews are the termites of America..

    In the 21st century, with communism long dead, Jews still want to express their difference from mainstream America.   

    But they rarely choose revolutionary politics as their means of expression. Instead, religious observance, commitment to Israel, and work for social justice are the main ways that Jews proclaim their identity.

    Rather than looking backward with yearning toward a true Red past, Jews should rejoice that most of us were free from the illusion that warped so many minds and lives and that America was spared what so many other countries had to endure: the coming to pass of Marx’s chootiya vision.

    Marx was a failure as a prophet, in spite of the fact that he inspired ( sic) revolutions that changed the course of history. Balls Marx inspired anybody.. Jew Rothschild fired over the shoulders of Marx, to steal

    His essential idea, influenced by Ricardo, was that capitalism would become less and less profitable and that its downward spiral toward the abyss of deflation—lower prices, lower profits—would be followed by worldwide revolution. Instead, capitalism has become vastly more profitable.


    Tunnel visioned Marx failed to predict the emergence of a new major class…the bureaucratic control class of middle managers, corporate lawyers, government bureaucrats of all sort.   

    This was brought about by the huge growth of both corporate ventures and the state, so that day to day management had to be ceded to an intermediate controlling class.

    JEW ROTHSCHILD TOOK OVER BUREAUCRACY ( NOMENKLATURA )  IN INDIA BY INJECTING INDOCTRINATED COMMIES FROM JNU / DU/ JU  ..

    HE USED AMERICAN COMMIE UNIVERSITIES ( BERKELEY UC/ COLUMBIA )  PACKED WITH JEWISH COMMIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPTS TO BRAINWASH INDIAN PROFESSORS..

     OUR SOCIAL SCIENCES PROFESSORS OF JNU/ JU/ DU/ TISS/ IITs ARE A COLLEGIUM SYSTEM , CHOSEN BY WHITE SKINNED COMMIE JEWS

    BELOW: THIS COMMIE JNU FEMALE PROFESSOR IS TALKING ABOUT PEACEFUL NON-VIOLENT VEGAN HINDUS


    Read all 11 parts of the pst below--

    OUR COMMIE LUTYENS BABUS HAS NO LOVE FOR THEIR MOTHERLAND.. THEY LOVED THE FOREIGN SILVER MORE.     THEIR CHILDREN GET SCHOLARSHIPS IN ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM FOUNDED WESTERN UNIVERSITIES..

    95% OF THE BABUS ( NOMENKLATURA )  IN OUR CRITICAL MINISTRIES ARE TRAITORS TODAY..   THESE TRAITORS ARE PROTECTED BY OUR ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA.




    Marx mistakenly believed that the key strategy for working class victory in the class war was the creation of worker political parties to “win the battle of democracy”

    Electoral democracy created by Jew Rothschild was only in its infancy in Marx’s day, so Marx ended up having a way too optimistic view of what could be accomplished through electoral politics.

    ROTHSCHILD CONVERTED ALMOST THE WHOLE PLANET TO ELECTORAL DEMOCRACIES. 

    BUT HEY, HE MAINTAINED SOME KINGDOMS RULED BY DESPOT KINGS — ALL OF WHICH WERE SUPER RICH IN OIL.

    ROTHSCHILD FIRST CONVERTED THE RULING BLOODLINES TO JEWISH, SO THAT HE CAN STEAL

    Read all 5 parts..

    Lawrence of Arabia was a white Jew, an agent of Rothschild..   His Jewess wife ( daughter of French Jew Michael Harry Nedou ) would later marry Sheikh Abdullah..

    THE 2008 GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRASH,  WHICH SOME SAW AS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF CAPITALISM IN CRISIS, JUST AS MARX HAD PREDICTED WAS A FALSE FLAG ATTACK --  A FUTILE ATTEMPT BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO PROVE THAT HIS PROTÉGÉ MARX WAS RIGHT


    FOR MARX, CONSCIOUSNESS DESCRIBES A PERSON'S POLITICAL SENSE OF SELF.    THAT IS, CONSCIOUSNESS DESCRIBES A PERSON'S AWARENESS OF POLITICS.   THIS IS HOW BIG A DRIPPIN’ CUNT MARX WAS..


     Two big failed predictions of Marx were that the working class in advanced industrial capitalism would tend to be revolutionary, and that advanced industrial capitalism provided the most fertile grounds for a transition to communism.

    Marginalism is a theory of economics that attempts to explain the discrepancy in the value of goods and services by reference to their secondary, or marginal, utility. The reason why the price of diamonds is higher than that of water, for example, owes to the greater additional satisfaction of the diamonds over the water. Thus, while the water has greater total utility, the diamond has greater marginal utility.

    The Marxist apparatus only claims Utopia, but it never comes

    Marxism is too abstract and doctrinal.  There was no practical value.. Marxism gives undue prominence to class war. Economy is not only determining factor in history. Marxism is mistaken in denying the eternal and universal principles of moral conduct.

    George Orwell in “The Animal Farm” shows how another hierarchy forms along the lines of the old one, because, alas, some animals will always be “more equal” than others and, despite the dreams and the theories, no society has been able to dispense with hierarchy.


    In political theory and particularly Marxism, class consciousness is the set of beliefs that a person holds regarding their social class or economic rank in society, the structure of their class, and their class interests.   

    According to Karl Marx, it is an awareness that is key to sparking a revolution that would "create a dictatorship of the proletariat, transforming it from a wage-earning, property-less mass into the ruling class"

    The relationship between philosophy and Marxism has always been an awkward one. ‘Philosophy stands to the study of the real world in the same relationship as masturbation stands to real sexual love,’ said Marx

    By "class consciousness", Marx  make the distinction between "class in itself", which is defined as a category of people having a common relation to the means of production; and a "class for itself", which is defined as a stratum organized in active pursuit of its own interests 

    Defining a person's social class can be a determinant for their awareness of it. Marxists define classes on the basis of their relation to the means of production, especially on whether they own capital.

    In Joker movie we get to see a pseudo Marxist revolution.  You see, economic inequality was driving the city apart. The city had divided along these two lines: the super-wealthy and everyone else — bourgeoisie and proletariat.



    In the Essence of Christianity there is another indication of a theory of the origins of religion. Jew Ludwig Feuerbach says:

    “Nature listens not to the plaints of man, it is callous to his sorrows. Hence man turns away from Nature, from all visible objects. He turns within, that here, sheltered and hidden from the inexorable powers, he may find audience for his griefs. Here he utters his oppressive secrets; here he gives vent to his stifled sighs. This open-air of the heart, this outspoken secret, this uttered sorrow of the soul, is God. God is a tear of love, shed in the deepest concealment over human misery. "God is an unutterable sigh, lying in the depths of the heart.” 


    Later we will find that some of the comments Marx makes on religion and God are reminiscent of this statement of Feuerbach.


    Dialectical materialism, is a philosophical approach to reality derived from the teachings of Karl Marx . ... They did not deny the reality of mental or spiritual processes but affirmed that ideas could arise, therefore, only as products and reflections of material conditions


    The writings of Marx were studied like religious texts. That is why Stalin liquidated the editors of the Marx-Engels Historisch-Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Rjazanov and Adoratskij, as their work threatened to reveal that Marx had feet of clay.


    A year before the Revolutions of 1848, Marx and Engels thus wrote The Communist Manifesto, which was prepared to an imminent revolution and ended with the famous cry: "Proletarians of all countries, unite!".

    Marx would later arrive to his theory of commodity fetishism, exposed in the first chapter of the first book of Das Kapital (1867).

    In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, commodity fetishism is the perception of the social relationships involved in production not as relationships among people, but as economic relationships among the money and commodities exchanged in market trade. As such, commodity fetishism transforms the subjective, abstract aspects of economic value into objective, real things that people believe have intrinsic value

    Marx borrowed the concept of "fetishism" from The Cult of Fetish Gods (1760) by Charles de Brosses, which proposed a materialist theory of the origin of religion
    The value-form or form of value is a concept in Karl Marx's critique of political economy. 

    It refers to the social form of a tradeable thing as a symbol of value, which contrasts with its physical features, as an object which can satisfy some human need or serves a useful purpose.The physical appearance of a commodity is directly observable, but the meaning of its social form (as an object of value) is not.

    Narrating the paradoxical oddities and metaphysical niceties of ordinary things when they become instruments of trade, Marx seeks to provide a brief morphology of the category of economic value as such—what its substance really is, the forms which this substance takes, and how its magnitude is determined or expressed. 

    He analyzes the forms of value in the first instance by considering the meaning of the value-relationship that exists between two quantities of commodities.

    In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, commodity fetishism is the perception of certain relationships (especially production and exchange) not as relationships among people, but as social relationships among things (the money and commodities exchanged in market trade). As a form of reification, commodity fetishism transforms the intersubjective, abstract aspects of economic value into things that people believe have intrinsic value.

    Marx explained the sociological concept underlying commodity fetishism thus:

    As against this, the commodity-form, and the value-relation of the products of labour within which it appears, have absolutely no connection with the physical nature of the commodity and the material relations arising out of this. It is nothing but the definite social relation between men themselves which assumes here, for them, the fantastic form of a relation between things. 

    In order, therefore, to find an analogy we must take flight into the misty realm of religion. There the products of the human brain appear as autonomous figures endowed with a life of their own, which enter into relations both with each other and with the human race. 

    So it is in the world of commodities with the products of men's hands. I call this the fetishism which attaches itself to the products of labour as soon as they are produced as commodities, and is therefore inseparable from the production of commodities

    Karl Marx did apply the concepts of fetish and fetishism, derived from economic and ethnologic studies, to the development of the theory of commodity fetishism, wherein an economic abstraction (value) is psychologically transformed (reified) into an object, which people choose to believe has an intrinsic value, in and of itself

    In Das Kapital Marx expressed a desire to reveal “the economic law of motion of modern society” and laid out his theory of capitalism as a dynamic system that contained the seeds of its own self-destruction and subsequent triumph of communism
    Marx's economics took as its starting point the work of the best-known economists of his day, the British classical economists Adam Smith, Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo.

    Jew David Ricardo (1772-1823) was a classical British economist best known for his theory on wages and profit, labor theory of value, theory of comparative advantage, and theory of rents. David Ricardo and several other economists also simultaneously and independently discovered the law of diminishing marginal returns

    In The Wealth of Nations (1776), Smith argued that the most important characteristic of a market economy was that it permitted a rapid growth in productive abilities. Smith claimed that a growing market stimulated a greater "division of labor" (i.e. specialization of businesses and/or workers) and in turn this led to greater productivity. 

    Although Smith generally said little about laborers, he did note that an increased division of labor could at some point cause harm to those whose jobs became narrower and narrower as the division of labor expanded. Smith maintained that a laissez-faire economy would naturally correct itself over time.

    Adam Smith was the "one man think tank" to the owner of British East India Company.  Rather he was the adviser to Robert Clive, the henchman of Rothschild..  Much later he would advise Rothschild on how to set up his banking cartel and set up a blue print on how to control the world.

    The world has been taken over by a handful of business powers as per the blue print of Adam Smith , who dominate the natural resources we need to live, while controlling the money that we need to obtain these resources.

    Adam Smith used his deception model to end the Mughal Empire in India. There was supposed to be a great heroic Battle of Plassey in 1757, for the British East India Company under Robert Clive to take over India.


    Adam Smith ( born 5 June 1723 – died 17 July 1790) took ten years to write his economics gospel by way of a book “The Wealth of Nations “ , publishing it in 1776. .  He never married, and he used to walk like a CHAKKA.  He was delusional too,  sometimes in a morbid manner..

    He is also said to have put bread and butter into a teapot, drunk the concoction, upped his ante and made a hue and cry over the quality of tea . Another time our man Adam Smith without as much as a “by your leave”  went out sleep walking in his nightgown in broad daylight and ended up 24 km outside of town, before nearby church bells brought him back to reality.

    His house used to look like a garbage dump as he hoarded everything. Adam Smith had OCD or obsessive compulsive disorder


    Much later in 1799, Rothschild would murder Tipu Sultan , and then make a huge pretense of a great war. By now Adam Smith was dead and gone. But the blue print was his alone.


    Amartya Sen’s Rothschild Jewess wife in THE expert on Adam Smith economics


    Indian Nobel prize winner , Amartya Sen's third wife is Emma Rothschild, who is the direct blood sister of Amschel Mayor James Rothschild.


    When such people write the gospel of economics, " The Weath Of Nations" you know what you will get.  Much later Milton Friedman effectively took many of the basic principles set forth by Adam Smith and the classical economists and modernized them.  This is the reason why economists fall into the same hole again and again and again.

    The heavy part comes now-- let me crack a quintessential  "Economist " joke, to cheer you up.

    These dorks are so full of themselves .

    Experienced economist and not so experienced economist are walking down Oxford street.

    They get across shit lying on the asphalt.

    Experienced economist: "If you eat it I'll give you $20,000!"

    Not so experienced economist runs his optimization program on his I7 procesor laptop and figures out he's better off eating it so he does and collects money.

    Continuing along the same road they almost step into yet another pice of turd.

    The not so experienced economist: "Now, if YOU eat this shit I'll give YOU $20,000."

    After evaluating the proposal , our experienced economist eats shit and pockets the moolah.

    They go on.

    The not so experienced economist starts thinking aloud : "Listen, we both have the same amount of money we had before, but we both ate shit. I don't see us being better off."

    Experienced economist: "Well, that's true, but you overlooked the fact that we've been just involved in $40,000 of fucking trade."

    Adam Smith (1776) defined what was then called political economy as "an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations".

    Economists use gross domestic product (GDP) to keep track of how an economy is doing, which is a flawed way. GDP measures the value of all final goods and services produced in an economy in a given period of time, usually a quarter or a year.   So a recession occurs when GDP is decreasing.  A boom occurs when GDP is increasing.

    The assessment of economic growth based on Gross Domestic Product is a fallacy, because GDP is merely a measure of the amount of money in an economy. The one thing it does not measure, which is central to economic progress (note progress, not growth), is the level of entrepreneurial activity in a country like India.  Don’t believe me , just take a flight to Coimbatore or Ludhiana . This has important implications for the efficacy of government interventions and solutions to the current economic crisis.

    On a ship I judge an officer by his future potential. NOT by what he did in the past. At sea we look ahead and we do NOT look too much into the rear.

    GDP is basically the sum total of recorded business activity at the consumption level plus government spending expressed in money terms.  If the government spends more, GDP rises; give more money to consumers, GDP rises; give more bank credit to consumers or business, GDP rises.  Cut government spending, GDP falls. This is not contentious and has nothing to do with economic progress.  

    Importantly, it excludes future entrepreneurial activity, except to the extent that an entrepreneur has actually spent some money putting his future plans into action. The obsession with GDP means that entrepreneurial activity, which is Adam Smith’s unseen hand that guides our future, is invisible to economic planners.

    Indian farmers  who were NOT playing ball and resisting Opium cultivation in their fertile fields were forbidden to plant food. This was on Adam Smith’s advise to Warren Hastings.  This caused Indian famers to be shipped abroad as slaves..



    “Famine has never risen from any other cause but the violence of government attempting by improper means, to remedy the inconvenience of dearth.” – Adam Smith

    Adam Smith was responsible for the Chinese Opium misery. It was his idea.

    His theory was--   EVERY MAN IS ALLOWED TO PURSUE HIS HEDONISTIC DESIRES TO A LAWFUL CONCLUSION, AND THAT OPIUM IS A "LEGITIMATE PRODUCT" . ( If you want to know what is Hedonism , go to Negril Jamaica , and check out drugged orgies on the open beach in broad daylight -- own pleasure first ! screw everybody else !!)   ALL OBSTACLES TO BUYING CHEAP AND SELLING DEAR MUST BE REMOVED, WHICH IS THE CORE OF GLOBALISATION...

    Emma R0thschild's has also done a good job of white washing  hedonist and East India company employee, Adam Smith vide her book ECONOMIC SENTIMENTS.

    Adam Smith's brilliance cannot be questioned with economists around you,unless you want to be insulted.  Any errors he made were excused as the inevitable flaws of any great IQ absent minded professor..

    'Adam Smith ties' were worn as a badge of honour in the upper echelons of the Reagan Administration. Nobody would wear a Hitler tie, right?

    Marxists, hail Adam Smith as the ultimate inspiration of their own Founding Father, German Jew Karl Marx, who was related to Rothschild.. Indeed, if the average person were asked to name two economists in history whom he has heard of, Smith and Marx would probably be the runaway winners of the poll.

    Adam Smith originated nothing that was true, and  whatever he originated was bull. Adam Smith was a shameless plagiarist, from the works of Richard Cantillon. 

    Have you seen our own mediocre economist Amartya Sen lisp the word “model” in every third sentence ?   He wants to stand out as a brilliant guy of the Adam Smith school, which is so dear to his Rothschild wife ( third one )..

    Modern economics is obsessed with modelling.  If an economist does NOT say the world model or even hear it, he will go crazy with withdrawal symptoms.

    What is a model?

    Models  describe a situation, and describe how that situation would be changed by a given set of event—demand and supply. A mathematical model as a predictive tool to demonstrate the outcome of events in this complex world run by human emotions — is for the gullible.

    Economists are pretenders who use formal mathematical techniques to understand, and hold your breath - accurately predict the result of changes in the economy .  The truth is that these stupid models can never  accurately predict the future.  

    When you fire a gun you know where the bullet will make a hole. But hey, our modern economists baffle you with bull, that they can accurately model the trajectories of prices, employment and interest rates .

    An economist with mediocre brains ( otherwise he would be a rocket scientist ) pretends to be a master of all trades -  philosophers, social engineers, historians, sooth sayers, mathematicians, statisticians, political scientists, sociologists and psychologists, among many other things.  The math equation is difficult to comprehend , as it is nonsense.

    Yet economics — and economic decisions, from the macro to the micro level — is a human subject NOT math.  It is subtle and psychological and sporadic. A human subject requires human language, human emotion, human intuition. The grand theoretical-mathematical approach to economics is nonsense...

    The pseudo-scientific school of mathematical economics if for the perfect world run by robots without emotions— where even the weather is math controlled and there can be no domino effects-- where there is no subtlety or ambiguity or uncertainty.
    Adam Smith copied from Cantillon's Essai .

    Adam Smith lifted Cantillon’s sustenance theory of wages—whole sale.

    Adam Smith not only contributed nothing of value to economic thought; his economics was a grave deterioration from his predecessors.

    The mystery of Adam Smith, then, is the immense gap between a trumped up reputation ( ashe rubbed shoulders with Rothschild ) and the sordid reality. The Wealth of Nations was made to blind all men, economists and laymen alike.

    The Wealth of Nations exerted such a colossal impact on the world thanks to Rothschild and East India Company, that all knowledge of previous economists was blotted out, hence Smith's reputation as Founding Father.

    Adam Smith, who laid out the blue print for fooling naive Indians into the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, so that opium traders Rothschild can take over India, officially. He was responsible for the Chinese Opium misery. It was his idea. 

    The fundamental Perspective as put forth by early free market economists, like Adam Smith, is that self interest and competition leads to social prosperity, as the act of competition creates incentive, which motivates people to persevere.



    Enough of false god and plagiarist Adam Smith and his reflected brilliance!


    1. TODAY--

      ADAM SMITH IS BEING KICKED INTO VADAKAYILs GARBAGE BUCKET.

      GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:


      1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
      2 NOAM CHOMSKY
      3 SIGMUND FREUD
      4) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
      5) AMARTYA SEN
      6) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
      7) IMMANUEL KANT
      8 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
      9) ALBERT EINSTEIN
      10) ISAAC NEWTON
      11) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
      12) CHARLES DARWIN
      13) KARL MARX
      14) MAX WEBER
      15) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
      16) FIBONACCI
      17) EDWARD BERNAYS
      18) JOHN DEWEY
      19) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
      20 PETER D OUPENSKY
      21) OPRAH WINFREY
      22) RICHARD BANDLER AND JOHN GRINDER
      23) CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
      24) STEPHEN HAWKING
      25) SIDNEY HOOK
      26) ALFRED KINSEY
      27) BARACK OBAMA
      28) AYN RAND
      29) WILHELM WUNDT
      30) RENE DESCARTES.
      31) EMPRESS HELENA
      32) RAYMOND IV
      33) SAINT MOTHER TERESA
      34) LENIN
      35) ENGELS
      38) ADAM SMITH

      ########################

      BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “

      1) NIKOLA TESLA
      2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
      3) IE IRODOV
      4) ARYABHATTA ( 2700 BC)
      5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
      6) CHANAKYA ( 372 BC )
      7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA ( 2000 BC )
      8) APOLLONIUS OF TYANA ( KERALA SAGE WHOSE LEGACY WAS USURPED BY COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )
      9) "JOHN DOE"
      10) JULIAN ASSANGE
      11) SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA
      12) GARY STEPHEN WEBB
      13) GEORGE ORWELL.
      13) CESAR MILLAN
      14) HENRY FORD.
      15) PANINI ( 5500 BC )
      16) BHARTRHARI ( 7000 BC )
      17) PATANJALI ( 5000 BC )
      18) MANU (8300 BC)
      19) YASKA ( 5800 BC )
      20) JOHN CARMAC
      21) QUEEN DIDO ( 1600 BC )
      22) KANADA MUNI ( 6500 BC )
      23) VARAHAMIHIRA ( 2660 BC )
      24) VARARUCHI ( 2830 BC )
      25) VIROCHANA ( 10, 650 BC )
      26) MAHABALI ( 10,600 BC )
      27) KALANAMI ( 10500 BC )
      28) IMHOTEP / AYYAPPA ( 3900 BC )
      29) PROF HYPATIA
      30) SWARBANU
      31) PUTIN
      32) EDWARD SNOWDEN


      CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----

      1) SUHEL SETH
      2) PRITISH NANDI
      3) DILIP CHERIAN
      4) PRANNOY JAMES ROY
      5) AROON PURIE
      6) VINEET JAIN
      7) SHEKHAR GUPTA
      8) SAGARIKA GHOSE AND HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI
      9) SHOBHAA DE
      10) SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN AND WIFE NANDINI SUNDAR
      11) KAMALHAASAN
      12) AUDREY TRUSCHKE
      13) NOSTRODAMUS
      14) MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
      15) VERGHESE KURIEN
      16) MS SWAMINATHAN
      17) DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
      18) SANJAY R HEGDE
      19) MARK ZUCKERBERG
      20) JACK DORSEY
      21) THOMAS L FRIEDMAN
      22) ROMILA THAPAR
      23) IRFAN HABIB
      24) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
      25) SHELDON POLLOCK
      26) WENDY DONIGER
      27) BARKHA DUTT
      28) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
      29) SWARA BHASKAR
      30) KARAN THAPAR
      31) ADAM D ANGELO
      32) SAINT CRYIL ARCHBISHOP OF ALEXANDRIA
      33) N RAM
      34) GRETA THUNBERG
      35) MK GANDHI
      36) SONIA GANDHI
      37) TED KACZYNSKI
      38) ZOYA HASAN


    Marx followed Adam Smith by claiming that the most important beneficial economic consequence of capitalism was a rapid growth in productivity abilities. Marx also expanded greatly on the notion that laborers could come to harm as capitalism became more productive.

    Rousseau was one of the first modern writers to seriously attack the institution of private property and therefore is sometimes considered a forebear of modern socialism and communism,  Marx rarely mentions Rousseau in his writings.

    According to Marx, bourgeois society and ideology as it is based on the ideas of the bourgeois class. The world through a consciousness living in such a society is a fantasy world, unreal, far from real life. ... Communism aims at restoring the balance between consciousness and reality

     BASTARD MARX MURDERED THE MEANING OF CONSCIOUSNESS

    Historical materialism, also known as the materialist conception of history, is a methodology used by some communist and Marxist historiographers that focuses on human societies and their development through history, arguing that history is the result of material conditions rather than ideas. This was first articulated by Karl Marx  as the "materialist conception of history".  

    It is principally a theory of history which asserts that the material conditions of a society's mode of production or in Marxist terms, the union of a society's productive forces and relations of production, fundamentally determine society's organization and development. Historical materialism is an example of Marx and Engel's scientific socialism, attempting to show that socialism and communism are scientific necessities rather than philosophical ideals

    Historical materialism is materialist as it does not believe that history has been driven by individual's consciousness or ideals, but rather ascribes to the philosophical monism that matter is the fundamental substance of nature and henceforth the driving force in all of world history; this drove Marx and other historical materialists to abandon ideas such as rights (e.g. "right to life, liberty, and property" as liberalism professed)

    Capitalists are not working together to achieve a common goal. Instead they spend a lot of resources on getting in each other's way. Marx felt that society could gain a lot from eliminating this waste.

    Whenever something evil happens somewhere a capitalist profits. Marx was sure of that. That way capitalism is the root of all evil.

    THE ROOT CAUSE OF ALL THIS EVIL IS PRIVATE PROPERTY ITSELF, ACCORDING TO MARX ( ONLY ROTHSCHILD AND HIS JEWISH AGENTS CAN OWN PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHT? )

    ROTHSCHILD  CREATED COMMUNISM IN INDIA BY CHOOSING AGENTS WHO WERE HONEY TRAPPED BY JEWESS WHORES

    Marx’s theory of political economy was used in the USSR to pretend that all value in the world comes from manual labor. Readers of Marx today should study the rise and the fall of the USSR in the 20th century.


    Capt Ajit Vadakayil declares --  Marx was not a philosopher at all-- he was not even a thinker . 

    At best he was a FAILED political economist, whose ridiculous nay stupid  theory now belongs to the trashcan of history.


    Rothschild’s blood relative Marx was the first political economist: i.e. the first to really focus on the interrelationship between economic systems and political structures.
    Political economy is a social science that studies production, trade, and their relationship with the law and the government.

    According to the labor theory of value, the value of something is determined by the amount of labor used to produce it. So consider the following case. One man goes out panning for gold and at the end of a 10-hour day has enough grains of gold to make an ounce. Another man goes walking along and in 1 minute, trips over a stone. He picks it up and it’s a gold nugget. Labor input? Ten hours vs. one minute. Value: the same.

    Marx  reduced man to a single, economic dimension of his existence. For Marx, there was no such thing as mankind. There was no common humanity sharing essentially the same outlook, capabilities and potentialities. 

    For him, man was rigidly defined by the economic class he was born into. This not only prescribed his economic role, it imprisoned him in a particular, class-bound reality – one he could never escape or transcend.

    So for Marx, there was no such thing as economics, politics and ethics, applicable to all thinking and feeling men, but only ‘proletarian’ or ‘bourgeois’ economics, politics and ethics.

    For Marx, there was no single reality, therefore, but multiple, mutually incomprehensible realities.   Class identity determined everything else.

    Marx made an art form of both historical determinism and the idea of utopia. History, he argued, was on a single set of tracks which, allowing for twists and turns (his pretentious but profoundly hollow dialectic), would inevitably end at the prescribed destination: a make-believe communism offering prosperity for all, freedom and the elimination of all injustice.

    Marx, ever the cynical polemicist, knew this combination of (pseudo-) science, prophecy and moralism would be an unstoppable propaganda tool, as it proved to be. It allowed Marx and his followers to lay exclusive claim to the future. 

    Any dissenting perspective could be dismissed not only as outmoded thinking, but as ethically wrong. History and the better world it promised, Marx kept reminding us, was on the proletariat’s side. The young and those on the make, in his day, found that irresistible.

    A polemic  is contentious rhetoric that is intended to support a specific position by aggressive claims and undermining of the opposing position. Polemics are mostly seen in arguments about controversial topics. Polemics often concern issues in religion or politics.

    Marx was the arch anti-empiricist. Nothing could disprove his bullshit theory or mad vision..

    Marx embraced Plato’s ( died 347 BC ) idea that only the chosen few, the philosopher kings, were able to glimpse reality. Plato studied in Kodungallur University Kerala , owned by the Calicut king…

    Plato’s student Aristotle was the only ancient Greek scholar who did not study in Kodungallur Univeristy.. All ancient Greek scholars stole knowledge and patented it I their own names. After which they were blackballed and Greek knowledge suddenly dried up like water in the hot desert sands..

    For Marx, only the Marxist intellectuals could shake off their class background and truly understand the world.  The uninitiated, lacking this exclusive scientific knowledge, could be treated with contempt. Intelligent lay skepticism and reasoned debate are ruled out.



    .
    .

    Marxism = Labor theory of value (Economic theory) + Political ideology + Sociology theory + Philosophical method. 

    Marx baby’s  last word on philosophy was "philosophers have only interepreted the world the point is to change it"

    Marxism is based on the fact that as long as Capitalism lasts, the overwhelming majority of the worlds workers will never have their needs met

    Marx believed that the final collapse of capitalism would come when the workers gained class consciousness. Once this occurred, they would overwhelm the bourgeoisie and take control of the means of production.

    It would be a worldwide revolution, not in a single country. It would be a violent revolution.

    It's deplorable how many people still venerate Mad Marx as a visionary after the immiseration and death of tens of millions who had the misfortune to live in societies led by zealots pursuing his dream of a socialist utopia.

    Marx wrote thousands of pages cataloging capitalism's ills, both real and imagined, but precious few about the organization and functioning of the (purportedly) superior socialist society that would inevitably supplant it. He just asserted its superiority.

    Marx wrote thousands of pages cataloging capitalism's ills, both real and imagined, but precious few about the organization and functioning of the (purportedly) superior socialist society that would inevitably supplant it. He just asserted its superiority.
    Marxists do not see history as a mere series of isolated facts but rather, they seek to discover the general processes and laws that govern nature and society

    For social sciences, Marx introduced the 'histomat' idea ( historical materialism ), the notion that people are largely motivated by materialism rather than by religious or ideological reasons ..  It states that a society's economic organization fundamentally determine its social institutions.

    Marxist theory of history that regards material economic forces as the base on which sociopolitical institutions and ideas are built.   A society's economic organization fundamentally determine its social institutions 

    It states that the material conditions of the mode of production determines its organisation and more importantly its development i.e. how goods are made influences society, and how society changes over time. ... Historical materialism is also central towards a Marxist conception of the political world.

    According to Marxist theory, class consciousness is an awareness of one's social and/or economic class relative to others, as well as an understanding of the economic rank of the class to which you belong in the context of the larger society. 

    In addition, class consciousness involves an understanding of the defining social and economic characteristics and collective interests of your own class within the constructs of the given socio-economic and political order.

    Class consciousness is a core facet of Marx's theory of class conflict, which focuses on the social, economic, and political relationships between workers and owners within a capitalist economy. The precept was developed in conjunction with his theory on how workers might overthrow the system of capitalism and then go on to create a new economic, social, and political system based on equality rather than inequality and exploitation.

    Marx perceived class as the relationship of people to the means of production—the owners versus the workers.

    In the Poverty of Philosophy Marx writes that human beings are "both the authors and the actors of their own drama."

    Marx draws on his formulation of base and superstructure. Historical development is the reflection of changes in the economic and material relations of the base. When the base changes, a revolutionary class becomes the new ruling class that forms the superstructure. 

    During revolution, the revolutionary class makes certain that its ideas appeal to humanity in general so that after a successful revolution these ideas appear natural and universal. These ideas, which the super-structural elements of society propagate, then become the governing ideology of the historical period. 

    Furthermore, the governing ideology mystifies the economic relations of society and therefore places the proletariat in a state of false consciousness that serves to reproduce the working class.

    Morality, religion, metaphysics, all the rest of ideology and their corresponding forms of consciousness no longer retain the semblance of independence; they have no history and no development; but men, developing their material production and their material intercourse, alter, along with their real existence, their thinking and the products of their collective thinking.


    Communism simply couldn't account for human behaivor. We need things to strive for and if you can't offer reward, the only alternative is to offer fear. Marxism can be defended with heavy mathematical formulas and obscure models but the reality will never become the utopian dream it was meant to be.

    The inherent flaw in Marx's Communism is the idea that society is divided into workers and managers and the two are different species.

    Marx was an inept "economist" who got nearly every basic precept wrong.  Mare totally mis-read where economic development was heading because he ignored evidence that would contradict his thesis.

    Marx was just another fantasist inventing a secular religion that would have baleful consequences around the world when adopted by chancers and thugs to provide cover for their self-aggrandizement. Given how vile a personality Marx was, this outcome was hardly a surprise.

    The Marxist search for the laws of historical development, along with the operating manual for capitalism, is akin to an intensive search for Peter Rabbit. The reason that bunny has not been found, as of yet, is not because there is insufficient research on the issue. 

    The reason Peter Rabbit remains so elusive is that the fucker doesn't exist.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tale_of_Peter_Rabbit

    Marx went down the rabbit-hold in search of Peter.  His replacement utopia ends up nowhere by expecting too much of human beings.

    Only a mad man like Marx can assume that that profound human activities are akin to mechanisms.

    At leftist meetings, Marx always  bullied and humiliated anyone who tried to disagree with his theses. He had Rothschild’s mafia and monopolized media working for him.

    This combination of “ bestowed brilliance”, controversy and self-promotion meant that Marx's reputation rose far above that of rival leftist political economists. 

    Over the course of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, his Rothschild aided ideas came to be accepted as unchallengeable dogmas on the revolutionary political left.


    THE FIRST WORLD WAR TRIGGERED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD HAD A SINISTER AGENDA.. 

     WHEN THE CREDIBILITY OF EUROPE'S ROYAL HOUSES COLLAPSED IN THE WAKE OF THE DISASTROUS FIRST WORLD WAR, IT WAS MARX'S IDEAS AND DOCTRINES THAT LEFTIST REVOLUTIONARIES BULLDOZED TO IMPLEMENT— AIDED BY ROTHSCHILD MONOPOLIZED MEDIA .  

    THE WHOLE IDEA WAS FOR ROTHSCHILD TO TAKE OVER AS “BIG BROTHER” AND CARVE OUT THE STATE OF ISRAEL.

    Marx's writings became the Bible of the revolutionaries who took power in Russia in 1917, and later in other countries.

    Even today, after Marxism-inspired state communism has been thoroughly discredited by the dark experiences of history, innumerable leftist groups define themselves as "Marxists" and cling to the bearded economist's ideas with quasi-religious intensity.

    Mad Marx's core idea was that the whole of human history could be explained as a materialist struggle between classes, playing out a zero-sum game over control of the means of production and the distribution of what is produced.


    Again, By "capital," Marx meant the physical means of production, rather than money (financial capital), According to Marx, history evolves through the interaction between the mode of production and the relations of production.


    When Marx talked about "value relationships" or "value proportions" (German: Wertverhältnisse), he did not mean "the money" or "the price". Instead, he meant the value proportions that exist between products of human labour. These relationships can be expressed by the relative replacement costs of products as labour hours worked. 

    The more labour it costs to make a product, the more it is worth and inversely the less labour it costs to make a product, the less it is worth. Money-prices are at best only an expression or reflection of Marx's value relationships—accurately or very inaccurately.


    Das Kapital is full of obvious important internal inconsistencies, a basic reliance on tautological reasoning, numerous distinctions without practical difference, bald denials,  selective - one hand clapping - analyses of causation, semantics games based on sly and nonfunctional definitions and redefinitions of terms, and a host of omitted essential factors.


    Even Marx, although working feverishly on Das Kapital for about three decades, ultimately found it impossible to work logically with his own ideas.  Nobody is told that after 30 years of writing Das Kapital, Marx died with his book totally incomplete, with Engels desperately tying up the loose ends.. 

    Marx is like Moses ( who never existed ) searching for Israel by going round and round in circles..eating manna.


    At the time of his death (1883), Marx had prepared the manuscript for Das Kapital, Volume IV, a critical history of theories of surplus value of his time, the 19th century.

    Karl Marx, created a dense rationale for emphasizing the undoubted abuses and arguing that all the contributions of the capitalist ownership interest and capitalist financial systems are of no value and can thus be dispensed with.

    Glaringly omitted from the Marx definition of economic value are all the factors that contribute to economic production of goods and services but that have no direct relation to labor on commodities as defined by Marx.

     His narrow labor definition of value - limited to industrial labor use-values - is exclusive because other things of value in the market don't meet it. Things of value that don't involve industrial labor have no value because they don't involve industrial labor. 

    Since the labor theory of value is scientific truth, it cannot be undermined even by a multitude of obvious exceptions some of which he expressly recognizes as of economic benefit. Any value that doesn't conform to his definition of value must therefore be "imaginary."


    Mad Marx is the Wizard of Oz exclaiming: "Pay no attention to those values behind the fuckin' curtain."


    If Marx was the captain of a ship, his ship would never reach port..Marx commits the ultimate sin in economics - he is not practical. Any concept of value that cannot be accurately and readily calculated is useless for the fundamental purpose of allocating scarce resources.

    Choot ka dhakkan Marx' abstract labor standard can only be applied  to simple tasks dictated by the pace of industrial machines.

    Marx - and the Marxists who followed him - would fail to explain how his abstract labor standard of value would apply to the vast mass of real labor that - because of talent, diligence and skill - rises above average levels.

    Karl Marx appealed to one of the most base emotions: envy. As George Orwell observed about British socialists in the 1930s, “It’s not that the loved the poor. They hated the rich.”


    Marxism is a historical fraud and failure.  No intelligent person should give credence to ANYTHING about Marxism. 


    Marx kept his Das Kapital long and ponderous, to prevent people reading it.  Rothschild’s media ensured that this shit book Das Kapital competed with Bible (cooked up by Jewess Helena in 325 AD ) to take the top place .


    IN HIS AGE OF AI , MARXs ECONOMIC THEORIES ARE DEAD.. 

    PEOPLE TRYING TO PUSH MARXISM IN INDIA HAVE A VESTED FOREIGN FUNDED AGENDA.  THEY MUST BE PROFILED AND JAILED.   WE KNOW THESE TRAITOR BASTARDS

    Rationalization is not reason! Das Kapital is a massive exercise in rationalization almost entirely devoid of reason. It is useful only as a propaganda myth, at which it proved spectacularly successful

    Marx, himself, would repeatedly be forced to have resort to market prices as an approximation. Where there are no market prices - as in socialist experiments based on administered prices - it would remain impossible to evaluate real labor in terms of the standard labor unit devised by Marx.

    The political slogan "Workers of the world, unite!" is one of the most famous rallying cries from The Communist Manifesto (1848) by Karl Marx


    BELOW: CHECK OUT THE MALLU PROLETARIAN COMMIE CUNTS, BRAINWASHED BY DAS KAPITAL.. 

    THEY SING " FROM EVERY DROP OF OUR SPILLED BLOOD THOUSANDS WILL RISE".

    AIYYOOOOOOOOOOOO



    The propaganda purpose of Das Kapital becomes apparent even before it begins. Marx starts right off in his Preface to the second edition by invoking the science propaganda ploy -  a common practice for him by this time. After all, who can doubt the word of "science? Even Jew Rothschild wont doubt TEE HEEE

      Marx spends inordinate time explaining this difference between the subjective use values of items and their objective values in exchange.

    In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, any product has a labor-value and a use-value, and if it is traded as a commodity in markets, it additionally has an exchange value, most often expressed as a money-price

    Adam Smith recognized that commodities may have an exchange-value but may satisfy no use-value, such as diamonds, while a commodity with a very high use-value may have a very low exchange-value, such as water

    In The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, Marx emphasizes that the use-value of a labour-product is practical and objectively determined, that is, it inheres in the intrinsic characteristics of a product that enable it to satisfy a human need or want. 

    The use-value of a product therefore exists as a material reality vis-a-vis social needs regardless of the individual need of any particular person. The use-value of a commodity is specifically a social use-value, meaning that it has a generally accepted use-value for others in society, and not just for the producer.

    Exchange value  refers to one of four major attributes of a commodity, i.e., an item or service produced for, and sold on the market. The other three aspects are use value, economic value, and price. 

    Thus, a commodity has:--

    a value (note the link is to a non-Marxian definition of value);
    a use value (or utility);
    an exchange value, which is the proportion at which a commodity can be exchanged for other commodities;
    a price (it could be an actual selling price or an imputed ideal price).


    This process of "crisis" is explained by Marx in terms of his pseudo scientific gibberish - of "contradictions" and "thesis" and "antithesis" - by which he attempts to reduce the complex and inherently indefinite logic of economic analysis to a formulaic method with pretensions to scientific certitude.

    The triad thesis, antithesis, synthesis is a progression of three ideas or propositions in which the first idea is followed by a second idea that negates the first, and the conflict between the first and second ideas is resolved by a third idea. 

    It is often used to explain the dialectical method of German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,but Hegel never used the terms himself, as instead his triad was concrete, abstract, absolute.

    All this TRIAD bullshit is lifted from the amazing wisdom of Dvaita Vedanta, a mere template to be imposed on Advaita Vedanta .. No western philosopher has the brains to understand the basics of Sanatana Dharma



    Dialectical progression in Vedanta propels your arguments by brain strorming..
    The thesis is an intellectual proposition.

    The antithesis is a critical perspective on the thesis.

    The synthesis solves the conflict between the thesis and antithesis by reconciling their common truths, and forming a new proposition.


    Das Capital has a theory of crisis , concerning the causes and consequences of the tendency for the rate of profit to fall in a capitalist system


     "The antithesis between use-value and value; the contradictions that private labour is bound to manifest itself as direct social labour, that a particularized concrete kind of labour has to pass for abstract human labour; the contradiction between the personification of objects and the representation of persons by things; all these antitheses and contradictions, which are immanent in commodities, assert themselves, and develop their modes of motion, in the antithetical phases of the metamorphosis of a commodity”  BAAAP REH !


    Psychoanalysis is that mental illness for which it regards itself as therapy. We could say about Marx inspired socialism that it is that economic nightmare for which it regards itself as a solution.

    Marx set out to answer a puzzle. Changing levels of supply and demand explain why the price of a commodity goes up or down, but does not explain why the equilibrium price of that commodity is what it is.

    To solve the puzzle Marx relied on the “labour theory of value”. He helped prove that the price of a commodity was determined by how much labour time had gone into it—which showed how workers were exploited. However, he “arbitrarily ruled out the relative desirability or utility of commodities,” . which would strike most people as the obvious explanation."

    MARX HAS THE CLOTH PRODUCING MILL OWNER VERSUS MILL WORKER MINDSET.  CAN MAD MARX EVEN IMAGINE TRANSLATING THIS TO SOMETHING LIKE APPLE OR GOOGLE OR RELIANCE.

    Communism is not fundamentally an ideology (like liberalism, conservatism, fascism or anarchism) but an economic system (like capitalism or serfdom/feudalism).

    An excessive emphasis on ideology leads to insensitivity towards practical feedback..   The reason Communism doesn't work is because it attempts to repress norms which exist within all human societies..

    People who start violent revolutions do it for their personal power, not for some far-fetched ideals. 

    Lenin or Stalin or Mao were not so much convinced communists, as they were convinced that communism would sell good to the masses and create a wave that they could ride to the very top (well, russian communists, after seizing power, adopted lifestyles even more lavish and abhorrent than the “bourgeoisie” they so fervently preached against).

    If they believed that selling coconuts would get them personally there these bastards would become fierce and self righteous coconutoists .


    Communism always was a failed ideology. It was Royalty under a new name

    We saw the same with the French Revolution which eventually created EMPEROR Napoleon. 

    Rothschild used Jew Napoleon to grab the wealth of the stupid John Bulls. 


    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/02/napoleon-unknown-side-capt-ajit.html


    Humans inherently have an innate bond to their family and friends. A man does not mind sacrificing his wealth for his blood child. The first time man is happy in defeat, is when he loses to his own son..  


    To live in Marxism is to sacrifice this deeply seated human instinct, which would require many CENTURIES to brainwash out the human psyche.  Reprogramming DNA takes time..


    From 4000 BC to 1933 AD , no Nair of Kerala knew who his father was..  The father never cared for his son.. He cared for his sister’s sons




    With the collective goal of society being equality of outcome, who is going to be motivated to achieve? You get nothing for it. No champion horse will give away his trophy to a donkey.  

    The smart, ambitious and competent people always flee these countries the most - unless they are killed as dissidents. Socialism is largely demotivating and even dysgenic.

    The dynamic between supply and demand creates prices in a market economy. Prices gives information. It guides production. It tells companies and entrepreneurs what people like to pay for, where there is profit to be made. 

    When you take away this mechanism... good luck having a collective  With socialist planned economies you always get over and underproduction side by side.


    The lack of market competition in combination with the lack of rewards leads to very low level of innovation.  And when you concentrate all power in society to one organisation ( state controlled by Nomenklatura ) you get massive corruption and power-abuse. And then we have the tragedy of the commons, as we have seen again and again , .

    AGAIN, COMMUNSM WAS DESIGNED BY ROTHSCHILD— TO SWIPE THE NATIONS TREASURY WEALTH AND TO SIPHON OFF THE GOLD/ JEWELRY  FROM ORDINARY PEOPLE..

    Karl Marx read Thomas Malthus’ work on over population, and believed it.

    Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is potentially exponential while the growth of the food supply is linear. It derives from the political and economic thought of the  Thomas Robert Malthus, as laid out in his 1798 writings Malthusian theory is based around population growth and its sustainability , Marxian theory is based around systems of society

    Marx designed a command-economy that was designed to discourage population growth. By ensuring there was never enough to support the current population he hoped to limit the rate of growth and manage it.  Rothschild was successful in depopulating Russia and  China..

    The main feature of every Communist government in history has been a stagnant economy and a miserable standard of living for the vast majority of the citizens. They all eventually fail because it doesn’t work. The economy collapses.

    Communism as an ideology is counter productive because the risk-reward or the effort-reward connections are completely broken. If and when everyone is entitled to everything regardless of the efforts and the amount of labor invested, the human nature is to minimize the efforts while maximizing the output. 

    That's why all efforts to establish a communism ended up in a totally corrupt society (maximizing output). The input was shrinking on its own without a proper reward. There was a perfect joke explaining this very nature:  "They pretend they pay us. We pretend we do the job."

    There was little if any reward for hard work or innovation and a lack of punishment for poor or inefficient work. The lack of incentives was a major reason for the poor performance of Eastern Europe economies. Why bother working hard if the reward was the same as doing the bare minimal?

    During Commie Jyoti Basu’s rule of Bengal, we all know the shit state of the people and infrastructure. In Calcutta port there were hundreds of GHOST jobs where he alar was drawn but work was never done. 

    It was such a disgrace that western crew on ships used to holler and ridicule.  At the lock gates in the west two people would do a job, while in Calcutta 20 people did the same job, often holding an umbrella in one hand to keep away the sun. 

    The labour unions with destructive attitudes and negative mindset ruled the roost. Nobody shipowner wanted Calcutta crew and they lost employment..


    KHOON POSEENA DETHA HOI,  POISA DENA ROTHA HOI !



    Communism failed to provide incentives for workers and citizens to work hard and be productive. While there are many benefits from equality ( reduces jealousy ) , if pushed to an extreme it robs people of an incentive to make an effort.


    This problem affected management too.   Under Communism managers were not incentivized to be economically efficient, but to fulfil the plan.  This meant there was a huge emphasis on quantity even if the quality was very poor. Managers often resorted to lying to meet unrealistic quotas.

    CHINAs ECONOMY TODAY IS A BUBBLE WITHIN A BUBBLE..   CHINESE GDP FIGURES AND GROWTH ARE ALL INFLATED.


     They suffered from perverse incentives that placed fulfilling political goals ahead of efficiency. Firms in general had little incentive to be efficient or control costs. They could easily access credit and further state funding to cover their costs. 

    Financial losses meant little to managers as there was no chance of the firm going bankrupt. No matter what the difficulties, the state would pay to bail the business out. The state guarantee of a job has meant everyone must be employed even if they add little to the factory.

    Capitalist firms can profit from new inventions or suffer losses for being technologically backward.  A communist firm gains no reward for innovation and suffers no loss for backwardness or even stagnation.  In fact these animals in the zoo don’t even know what happens outside the zoo gates in the deep forest.

    Capitalism is more flexible and allows new businesses to enter with new ideas, whereas communism is rigid and slow to adopt to change. Due to the repressive atmosphere of Communism, creativity was discouraged and treated with suspicion.

    Ideas had to conform to the party line; dissent was neither wise nor rewarding. Even an attempt to improvise or innovate was treated with suspicion and even insubordination.. 

    Commie rulers prized consistency.. they felt less threatened. I know.. 

    There was no too much of tourism in Commie nations..  I was a sailor, I saw it..



    The heavy levels of bureaucracy stifled attempts at innovation and the rigidity of the central plan made it exceptionally difficult for new innovations to be put into practice.


    Communism greatest weakness was its failure to adapt. If you fail to adapt you stagnate.. Change is not risky, but being stagnant is.


    Chairman Mao Zedong elaborates, “At no time and in no circumstances should a Communist place his personal interests first; he should subordinate to the interests of the nation and the masses. Hence selfishness and seeking the limelight are most contemptible, while ... working with all one’s energy, whole hearted devotion to public duty, and quiet hard work will command respect.”


    The government becomes an exchange point for all elements of the society. It decides what everyone has to contribute and it decides what everyone can receive. 

    Ultimately, it replaces the members actual needs with a standard set of needs. The next step further, the government devices not only on the people's needs but on the people's desires and ultimately the people's thoughts.

    Inevitably, communism goes hand in hand with thought and liberty restrictions and innovation crushing regulations. It never works on the long run. The total planned economy doesn't perform well growth wise.


    Communal living of atheists without a conscience  can only be supported by tyranny .  It fails due to the lack of social, economic and political competition.


    Imagine 10 guys working in a factory and one is just far superior to the nine others iin body mind and spirit --  it's human nature that that guy wants and deserves more. ..


    Under a communist system where nobody owns anything, if the tractor breaks no one really has the incentive to fix it.  Where under a capitalistic system someone who own that tractor would have a huge incentive to fix it.


    Neither freedom nor prosperity, was/is seen in any communism nation.  Mercy has never been its culture. Differences in standard of living, between capitalism and communism, was un-imaginable. 

    Communism, wanted to destroy capitalism, but having placed in wrong hands destroyed itself. It is good that mostly all countries have moved away from communist principles, for the better. It is good for the planet that this rabid commie dog has been put to sleep forever

    Dictatorship and communism are almost opposite theories which can’t go together.- but in practice it is the reverse.. The most extreme Islamic nation is Saudi Arabia. Their Jewish ruler bloodline can have any amount of women in the harem.. they can drink alcohol , do anything.. But hey, the common people will face death.. This is what happens when you allow Jews to run the show.


    Since building Communism was the goal, the Party had the main command role. And command they did, with that goal in mind. All manner of sacrifices were to be made for this goal. The goal was always tomorrow, and the sacrifices were always today. This is called cheating on the time axis


    The best analogy here is having a box of tomatoes and only eating the ones that had a spot of rot, because if you don’t, they will rot completely in short order, while the perfect tomato can last till tomorrow. The next day, though, that perfect tomato is the one with a spot of rot, and you eat it, and leave another perfect tomato for tomorrow. 

    It’s a great plan, and a great way to spend your life eating only rotten tomatoes.


    ON SHIPS THE STAGNANT CATEGORIES ( EXAMPLE ELECTRICAL OFFICERS/ PURSERS ) ARE THE WORST OFFICERS—  ESPECIALLY IN SCI HERE THERE IS JOB SECURITY AND A MILITANT UNION ..  

    I KEPT THESE LAZY OFFICERS ( MOST FROM PNJAAABI FAMILIES WITH ZERO CLASS ) ON A TIGHT LEASH, SHORTENING THE LEASH IF THEY GAVE ME HALF AN OPPORTUNITY.  

    THEY KNEW THAT ONCE THE LEASH IS SO SHORT THAT I HAVE THEM ON THEIR TOES WITH A HOOK THROUGH THE NOSTRILS, THE NEXT STEP IS TO BE “KICKED OUT OF THE SHIP” AT THE NEXT PORT..


    WHEN I MADE SERVICE REPORTS ( APPRAISAL FORMS ) I NEVER JUDGED A OFFICER ON HIS CURRENT PERFORMANCE—I JUDGED HIS FUTURE POTENTIAL.

    In Marxist thought, communist society or the communist system is the type of society and economic system postulated to emerge from technological advances in the productive forces, representing the ultimate goal of the political ideology of communism. 

    A communist society is characterized by common ownership of the means of production with free access to the articles of consumption and is classless and stateless, implying the end of the exploitation of labour.. 

    But Marx did not understand the meaning of logistics.  Wars are lost because of poor logistics..





    Communism is a specific stage of socioeconomic development predicated upon a superabundance of material wealth, which is postulated to arise from advances in production technology and corresponding changes in the social relations of production. This would allow for distribution based on need and social relations based on freely-associated individuals.


    COMMUNISM WAS JUST AN IDEA – ANY IDEA IS AS GOOD AS ITS IMPLEMENTATION.


    COMMUNISM  ONLY WORKS WHEN EVERYBODY IS EQUAL MINDED AND WHEN THERE IS NO NEED TO PROGRESS IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM— LIKE SOME MAROONED PEOPLE TRAPPED ON AN ISLAND AWAITING RESCUE..



    The simple reason why communism fails is that assumes everything is plentiful, everybody is perfectly equal and everybody is thinking the same way ( like surviving till rescue ).   

    While in reality it’s incredibly inefficient as the non productive members of society would require to be treated as equal to the productive members..

    The fundamental flaw in Marx-Engels-Lenin communism was its use of extreme violence and force

    Socialism always works until you run out of other people’s money..

    Communism and socialism are doctrines. It's TRUE that Marx posited Marxism as a science or philosophy; but it was really a hack job.


    Communism is incompatible with human nature and self esteem. To fall in love with yourself and being proud of what you see when you look into the mirror is the first step to happiness.. 

    When you discover what you are worth, you will find it impossible to thrive amongst useless people.. 

    The hardest part of any extreme journey is believing that you are worth the voyage.



    You can change whatever you want but if the core principle of your ideology is just completely wrong it will always fail. That is why all “communism” turns into chaos and then into totalitarian dictatorships basically overnight.


    PSSSST  - ALL COMMIE DICTATORS WERE CRYPTO JEWS  OR POODLES OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.

    Communism is simply a mad idea and will always fail no matter what.

    Capitalism is alive and well in China, Vietnam and Cuba.  Revenues from private enterprise are what keep those supposedly communist governments afloat.

    Communism proclaims that all individuals are equal. This is a great idea. However, many people believe that they are superior to others and they need someone to force them to be equal. When this happens, it isn’t true communism anymore as the person forcing everyone to be equal is now more powerful than everyone else.

    It is Jew Rothschild’s idea to keep Deepa Malik , her wheelchair and her motor mouth, at par with Usain bolt 


    BELOW: I PITY THIS WOMANs HUSBAND..   

    SHE WON A MEDAL IN A FIELD SHORN OFF ALL REAL / FAIR COMPETITION..  




    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/08/usain-bolt-grabs-gold-at-rio-100-metres.html


    In communism, everything is shared. This seems like a brilliant idea until you realise that a person who slacks off and is a lazy pig ( or pretending to be hurt/ sick )  in general gets the same things as a person who works their socks off and is very productive.


    While party loyalists and the well connected nomenklatura ( all Jewish ) suffered no privation, they still preached that everyone else must sacrifice themselves for the “good of the party”.   Corruption was rampant while none on top had even considered what they were doing was wrong in any way.


    There will always be someone that will want to work the system and funnel as much as they want and more into their own pockets at the expense of their neighbors.

    I headed teams for 35 years..  I know teamwork.. I know what to do with people who use “teamwork” for their greedy and unwarranted advantage..







    Anytime there is little incentive to work, failure is around the corner. Socialism drains incentive out of the process. The incentive is at the top of the ladder

    Communism  flies in the face of human nature (like all utopian ideas). People simply do not strive as hard for the “good of society” as they do to advance their own condition and the condition of their families.


    If you if you want Total Security go to prison. There you are fed, clothed, and given Medical Care. The only thing lacking is freedom. Prison is a kin to Communism. You're given all the basics. But your standard of living will be universally low. 

    A totalitarian Society will not long sustain itself, as freedom is a basic yearning of the human spirit.



    Communism puts too much power in the centralized government. If private property is abolished, then that means the government is a dictator. The idea was that the few will control how the lives of many will be lived.: communism was based on the assumption that the bourgeosie or upper class are abusive and should be overthrown. 

    But under the communist system, you actually have the same thing, a group of few violent and mean Jews who want to control the many.? It’s basically trying to solve a problem with the same thinking that created it.




    Being forced to possess all the things everyone else has infringes on your personal liberty and reduces the uniqueness that every person has.

    Running your country by terror is a bad idea.Communism requires a totalitarian government to maintain it..  The idea of communism was built out of sudden irrationality and people who don’t understand economics..

    The Mathematical manuscripts of Karl Marx consist mostly of Karl Marx's attempts to understand the foundations of infinitesimal calculus  Marx knew nothing of Math.. Whatever Math you see in Das Kapital has been inserted by agents of Jew Rothschild who knew advanced Math..

    Creating a completely equal society involves forcibly taking rewards that people have worked hard for, and distributing it to people who haven’t done anything to deserve it.. more so out of laziness.

    Risk is central to economic activity, but Marx pretty much ignores it. He wrote contemptuously about investment being merely "pushing tokens around". 

    Capital accumulation is the dynamic that motivates the pursuit of profit, involving the investment of money or any financial asset with the goal of increasing the initial monetary value of said asset as a financial return whether in the form of profit, rent, interest, royalties or capital gains.


    The aim of capital accumulation is to create new fixed and working capitals, broaden and modernize the existing ones, grow the material basis of social-cultural activities, as well as constituting the necessary resource for reserve and insurance. 

    The process of capital accumulation forms the basis of capitalism, and is one of the defining characteristics of a capitalist economic system.


    Adam Smith’s famous quote about self-interest: ”It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.”

    Adherents to Marxism are often so enamored by it that they treat it like infallible divine truths.

    You should see the stupid faces of Mallu and Bong commies..  The foreign funded violence they perpetrate to have a successful Commie bandh ( prevent people from working) has to be seen to be believed.  


    The illegal collegium Judiciary and benami Media are in cahoots..

    Marxism is the only way to heaven (on earth) and anyone or anything that isn’t for it is against it, and if you are against it, you are evil and your rights, freedoms, and opinions are negated. You lose the right to be free or even to live.

    Mad Marx argues that commodities have both a use-value and an exchange-value, and that their exchange-value is rooted in how much labor-power went into them. While traditionally people bought commodities in order to use them, capitalists use commodities differently. Their final goal is increased profit. 

    Therefore, they put out money and buy commodities, in order to sell those commodities for a profit. The cycle then repeats itself. The reason why the capitalists are able to make a profit is that they only need to pay workers their value (how much it takes to keep them functional), but the workers produce more than that amount in a day. Thus, the workers are exploited. 

    The capitalists are able to do this because they have more power, and control the means of production. Furthermore, the workers' character is negatively affected by the system. They don't own the products of their labor, and the repetitive work they have to do makes them little more than machines.


    WHAT MINDLESS BULLSHIT IS ALL THIS?


    Communism struggles to find the right balance between supply and demand because it has no motivation to do so. The government only needs to produce items based on what it believes the population needs to continue working. And no nation will import  inferior goods from a Commie nation..

    Supply and demand tend to focus on the export market only. This process allows the government to bring in currency that it can use on the global stage to reinforce its own importance domestically. That places further pressure on the general population to listen to production mandates since the consequences for disobedience can be quite high.

    Because ownership in a communist government lies with the state instead of in private hands, there is a higher risk of abuse for monetary purposes, power and control, or to pursue a personal agenda. 

    The people at the highest levels of government are the ones who control the resources, which means they can decide in an instant if someone is “worthy” or not of receiving something. Each household is always at the mercy of the government and its potentially ever-changing views on what they deem to be acceptable behavior.


    The goal of the communist party once it comes into power is to hold onto that leverage by any means necessary. Since the government controls every aspect of society, they can send out propaganda through all media channels with enough truth to make the stories believable. 

    A single commie Jew official might be in control of setting an agenda, measuring the performance of a society, or cracking down on actions that are deemed to be political dissent.


    The illegal collegium Judiciary and benami Media are in cahoots..


    Marxism is the only way to heaven (on earth) and anyone or anything that isn’t for it is against it, and if you are against it, you are evil and your rights, freedoms, and opinions are negated. You lose the right to be free or even to live.


    The most notorious example of forced collectivization is the land reform carried out by Soviets between 1928 and 1933. It was thought that collectivization would maximize the use and potential of the countryside for urban and industrial needs. Russian industry was just taking off, and enormous quantities of food would be required for the workers.



    Masses of resisting landowners—many of them small-scale farmers who worked their own land—died at the hands of executioners. The state’s requisition of crops, livestock, and farmland was paid for by the farmers and by the lower class in general, some ten million of whom starved to death in five years.



    Exactly the same atrocity took place in Communist China, between 1958 and 1961. During this time, private farming was outlawed as it had been in Stalin’s Russia, and about 36 million people starved to death in possibly the single most destructive famine in human history.



    COMMUNISM AND SOCIALISM ARE UMBRELLA TERMS REFERRING TO TWO LEFT-WING SCHOOLS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT; BOTH OPPOSE CAPITALISM


    As a system of government, communism tends to center on a one-party state that bans most forms of political dissent.  Communist Party officials (  Nomenklatura Jews ) assumes control over all of the country's social and economic activities.

    Socialism predates the Communist Manifesto by a few decades. Early versions of socialist thought were articulated by Henri de Saint-Simon (1760-1825), who was himself an admirer of  Adam Smith, but whose followers developed utopian socialism; Robert Owen (1771–1858); Charles Fourier (1772–1837); Pierre Leroux (1797–1871); and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809–1865), who is famous for declaring that "property is theft."

    Marxism emerged in this milieu. Engels called it "scientific socialism"..

    “Stalin is a Genghis Khan, an unscrupulous intriguer, who sacrifices everything else to the preservation of power... He changes his theories according to whom he needs to get rid of next”-—Nikolai Bukharin, 1928.

    As General Secretary, Stalin ensured that he was one of the only people allowed to see Lenin after his stroke, and he used that position to ensure that he became the new leader of the country.

    Bolshevik leaders ( all Jews ) appointed themselves to many high offices and started implementing communist practices based on Marx’s ideology. .   Lenin established the Cheka, a secret police force to defend the success of the Russian Revolution and censor and control anti-Bolshevik newspapers and activists  

    Stalin isolated his major opponents in the Communist Party, eventually throwing them out, and became the unchallenged leader of the Soviet Union. He officially ruled the country from 1924-1953.  People deemed to be political enemies began being imprisoned in labor camps or deported to remote areas of Russia. 

    In 1934, actions against political enemies, including members of the Communist Party who disagreed with Stalin’s policies, intensified with the start of the Great Purge. About 2.1 million people were executed from 1934 to 1940 under Stalin’s orders.

    After winning out against Trotsky, Stalin became one of the most brutal dictators in world history. He was a hammer, and he treated his entire country like a nail in his relentless quest for personal power. He went after his rivals, then his own comrades, then everyone else he didn't like.

    Jew Mao ordered a vast industrialization program that was supposed to transform China's agrarian economy into a much more advanced one. This project, called the "Great Leap Forward", hoped to create an industrial society that focused on manpower more than machines; hence the "backyard steel furnaces" phenomenon. 

    As a result of the incompetent attempt to shift peasants from farming to steelworking, China's economy crashed and around 51 million people starved to death.  After being sidelined as a result of this failure, Mao eventually launched yet another attempt at a rapid societal transformation in a bid to reestablish himself as the undisputed leader of China. 

    Starting in 1966, his so-called "Great Cultural Revolution" again toppled China into chaos, as a fanatic youth movement set out to destroy Chinese traditional culture and the supposed last vestiges of the old elites.  

    In practice, it was a reign of terror that consisted of completely random attacks against anyone and anything that drew the suspicion of the frenzied "Red Guards," among them no small number of their own operatives.

    Mao's eventual successor, Deng Xiaoping, effectively abandoned it by promoting pragmatic developmental policies, so that today's China is a booming capitalist economy ruled by a totalitarian oligarchy.

    The Chinese economy now represents the worst excesses of capitalism combined with the structural brokenness of the old communist system. China now relies heavily on aggressive jingoistic nationalism to motivate its people

    With the passage of labor laws, the strike has become the workers'"inherent right" and "collective bargaining" has come to be regarded as an effective means to achieve labor's purposes. Trade unions are a powerful institution in today's society and are so regarded by capitalists and politicians. When workers have assurance of their livelihood and security, they will not be interested in class struggle.

    The dark century of Das Kapital is finally over. . The universal awakening of human reason has opened a new era of thought centered on nationalism, democracy, and the people's livelihood

    Gary Kasparov said: “It is no coincidence that the values of the American century are also the values of innovation and exploration, individual freedom, risk-taking, investment, opportunity, ambition, and sacrifice. Religious and secular dictatorships cannot compete with these values, and so they attack the systems founded upon them.”
    Innovation is best fostered by systems that reward risk-takers, hard work, and implementation. Free markets (invisible hand stuff) do a great job in these respects; command economies do not.

    Communism was an exciting idea when it was first proposed; a time when most of the world was still run by kings and queens, and ordinary people had very little hope of escaping poverty. 

    But when some countries tried to make it work for real it turned out to be even worse, because instead of getting rid of their rulers and living as equals, people became enslaved by a new set of rulers instead. They were told that as the system began to work those rulers would give up their power, but neither of those things ever happened.

    The carrot on stick hung out by Karl Marx in his 1848 book, “The Communist Manifesto,” pure communism results in a society in which all people are equal and there is no need for money or the accumulation of individual wealth. There is no private ownership of economic resources, with a central government controlling all facets of production. Economic output is distributed according to the needs of the people. Social friction between white and blue-collar workers and between rural and urban cultures will be eliminated, freeing each person to achieve his or her highest human potential. CHOO CHWEEET APPAH !

    Communism sees the transition from Capitalism as being a violent bloody revolution where the existing system is effectively destroyed as the workers rise up against the middle and upper classes. 

    It is completely irrational to propose to smash and destroy a state entirely, then to build up one, and then again see its “withering away” while even the bourgeois state exists “without the bourgeoisie”.

    Communism and socialism are not the same thing, even though the two words are often used interchangeably.

    Socialism and communism both adhere to the principle that the resources of the economy should be collectively owned by the public and controlled by a central organization. 

    They differ, however, in the management and control of the economy. In socialism, the people themselves decide through communes or popularly elected councils on how the economy should work. This makes socialism a liberal system because majority of the people have a say on how the economy should be run. 

    Communism, on the other hand, controls its economy through a single authoritarian party. It is thus characterized as conservative because the economy functions based on the decisions of a few commie Jew Nomenklatura

    Socialism is an economic system while communism is both an economic and political system.

    You can see that, in a sense, communism is an extreme version of socialism. Marxists (students of Karl Marx) often describe socialism as the “first phase” of communism.
    The term socialism was created by Rothschild’s agent Jew Henri de Saint-Simon  , one of the founders of what would later be labeled utopian socialism.  

    He created a political and economic ideology known as Saint-Simonianism that claimed that the needs of an industrial class, which he also referred to as the working class, needed to be recognized and fulfilled to have an effective society and an efficient economy..  

    Saint-Simon's ideas, expressed largely through a succession of Rothschild owned  journals such as l'Industrie (1816), La politique (1818) and L'Organisateur (1819–20) focused on the perception that growth in industrialization and scientific discovery would have profound changes on society.. 

    Karl Marx identified Saint-Simon as being among whom he called the "utopian socialists"

    Like I said before, important socialist thinker in France was Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who proposed his philosophy of mutualism in which "everyone had an equal claim, either alone or as part of a small cooperative, to possess and use land and other resources as needed to make a living".


    The Fabian Society is a British socialist organisation founded by Rothschild which was established with the purpose of advancing the principles of socialism via gradualist and reformist means. The Fabian Society was organized January 4, 1884.   Marxism was a major influence on the Fabians.


    Communism dictates almost every goal or need of the individual. The government controls the law at all times. They can instantly decide if actions or conduct of individuals should become illegal, then apply those changes retroactively if they so choose.

    Communism makes no distinction between propaganda and education
    Indoctrination, education, and propaganda work together to change the perspectives of the general population. 

    Everything from textbooks to newspaper articles is carefully directed, managed, and monitored to produce results. They might offer reading and writing essentials to the general population, but in return, they ask for compliance in every aspect of life.

    Dissent is not permitted under Communist rule

    The commie government pursued a combination of censorship, imprisonment, suppression, and “labor re-education” to stop the activities of activists or dissidents.

    Dissidents in the Soviet Union faced an even worse fate, including forced admittance to mental hospitals, entry to a labor camp, or general exile. Because dissent was considered a criminal act, it could result in lengthy prison sentences too.

    There is no way to change the behaviors of the ruling group ( nomenklatura ) from within..


    When Communism encounters a voice which doesn’t support it, the first effort involves immediate suppression through repression. People disappear frequently, even today


    BELOW: SECOND STANDARD FAIL, MM MANI, THE ELECTRICITY MINISTER OF KERALA , WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE KERALA FLOODS 2 YEARS AGO, BOASTING HOW COMMIES KILLED THEIR OPPONENTS..

    We made a list of 13 people...1, 2, 3, 4. First, we killed three among that; one was shot dead, one stabbed, and one beaten to death," Mani had said in his speech. 



    Forced disappearances occur when the state secretly imprisons or abducts someone, then refuses to acknowledge their whereabouts or fate.  Often mafia goons in police uniforms take away people at midnight.. Under Communist rule, forced disappearance implies either murder or long-term forced labor with plausible deniability.


    In Commie rule , you’re not permitted hobbies because that is labor which does not benefit society. Only if you praise the commie govt will you be allowed to write poetry or paint or sing

    In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and co-author Friedrich Engels outlined the following 10 points:--- 
    Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes
    A heavy progressive or graduated income tax
    Abolition of all right of inheritance
    Confiscation of the property of all immigrants and rebels
    Equal liability of all to labor and establishment of industrial armies (especially for agriculture)
    The gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country.
    Free education for all children in public schools and abolition of children's factory labor
    Centralization of credit in the hands of the state
    The state would control communication and transportation
    The state factories and instruments of production would cultivate wastelands and improve the soil


    The manifesto mentions state ownership in its last three points, which makes even this pure vision of communism sound like socialism..


    The laws of supply and demand don't set prices—the government does. Planners lose the valuable feedback these prices provide about what the people want.  They can't get up-to-date information about consumers' needs, and as a result, there is often a surplus of one thing and shortages of others. 

    To compensate, citizens create a black market to trade the things the planners don't provide, which destroys the trust in Marx's pure communism. Black marketers risk death.. People no longer feel the government can give "to each according to his needs."

    In 1922, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was established with six communist countries: Russia, Belorussia, Ukraine, and the Transcaucasian Federation. In 1936, the Federation became Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia. By 1992, when it dissolved, the USSR contained 15 countries. The remaining nine were Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.


    In a Communist structure, there is one overall entity which controls the message and agenda of the society.. If you don’t agree with the direction of society, you could be imprisoned or worse killed .

    There is rarely any contact with the outside world that has not been screened by the government first. That means the population can think they are informed on current events, but in reality, they are purposely kept in ignorance , like mushrooms in the dark.

    There is no precedent for inheritance under Communism because everything belongs to the singular party, state, or government

    FEAR IS THE KEY

    One day King Akbar said to Birbal, "Birbal, my people are very obedient to me. They love me very much." Birbal smiled and replied, "This is true, but they fear you too, Jahaanpanaah." Akbar could not agree on this, so it was decided that Birbal's statement should be tested.

    Next day, according to Birbal's instructions, the King announced that he would be going for hunting, and people should pour a pot of milk in a tub kept in the courtyard. Next day when Akbar returned from hunting, he found that there was no milk in the tub, instead there was only water. Akbar got very disappointed, but couldn't do anything.


    Then Birbal said, "This time you will announce that you will come back and see the tub yourself." King did as Birbal said. Once again the tub was kept in the courtyard. This time when King returned from the hunting, he found the tub overflowing with milk. Birbal said, "I told you. It is your fear which made people obey you. The first time there was no one to check the tub, so people poured the water, but the second time, they knew that you would check yourself, that is why they brought the milk."



    The disadvantages of the Commie system mainly originate from the elimination of free trade rights. This means that supply and demand do not dictate the prices and only the government can. Due to this, the planners do not benefit from feedback concerning the costs as well as information that tells them what people want.
    Communism is not a good environment for businesses to flourish. Unlike in a capitalist society, where there is virtually no limit as to what businesses will earn, a communist form of government would put a hard cap on a business’s ability to grow.
    There is little room to have personal ambitions in a communist country, since everyone is the same and no one is expected to do something out of the ordinary. Personal growth or development does not thrive in a communist regime.

    AT SEA I INTRODUCED SEVERAL INNOVATIONS AND CAUSED DANGEROUS LAWS TO BE CHANGED FOR THE BETTER,  DEFYING MY COMPANY AND GLOBAL REGULATORY BODY IMO.. . 

    I RISKED BEING SACKED BY MY COMPANY OR EVEN DECLARED PERSONA NON GRATA AT THE SEA BY IMO.   

    IF THE SYSTEM WAS COMMUNIST I WOULD HAVE DIED IN THE GULAG — FROZEN TO DEATH..

    I CAN QUOTE HUNDREDS OF EXAMPLES.. HERE ARE THREE ..





    The temptress of socialism is constantly luring us with the offer: “give up a little of your freedom and I will give you a little more security.” This is like inviting a lion of the deep jungle to sat in a Zoo .  As the experience of this century has demonstrated, the bargain is tempting but never pays off. We end up losing both our freedom and our security.


    The redistribution of wealth is a cycle of contempt—a cycle that fosters corruption and breeds hatred, jealousy, and resentment. It’s dehumanizing and it weakens the human soul. This is the gateway to mass evil...


    Marx states in the Manifesto of the Communist Party:--

    You must, therefore, confess that by "individual" you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible. (Published by Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1973 edition, page 66)


    Followers of Karl Marx, like Stalin and Mao Tse-tung, have taken this affirmation literally and have proceeded to kill the "middle-class owners of property" once they have acquired power.

    Jew Marx proudly affirmed that he was a materialist.   Jew Mao Tse-tung summarizes the materialism of Marx with the statement: "There is nothing in the world apart from matter in motion." (On Contradiction, International Publishers Edition, 1953, page 20)

    Marxism does not deny the existence of thought and spirit. It affirms that these are derivatives of matter; that the brain secretes thought as the liver secretes bile.  

    So so so, Since thought and emotions are the product of material elements, they can be controlled by controlling the material elements which produce them. Thus the materialism of Marx provides the basis for the control of ideas and attitudes and ultimately of human nature itself.

    Marxism teaches that the economic environment creates the ideas, attitudes and impulses that constitute human nature. It pays attention to the environment of infancy and childhood since the brain is undergoing more rapid development during this period. 

    The experiences of life, provided by the economic environment, are stored up within the structure of the brain and ultimately reveal themselves in the thoughts and emotions of the mature individual.

    Those people who shared the same experiences in the process of production generated the same brain structure. Consequently, they thought and felt alike. They formed a class. BRAAAYYYY

    In his analysis of the capitalist mode of production, Marx allegedly discovered two economic environments. One was that shared by those who owned the means of production. They formed a class which he named the bourgeoisie. 

    The other environment was that of wage labor. The laborers formed the class known as the proletariat. Marx affirmed that a state of universal conflict existed between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He named this conflict the class struggle or the class war.

    Marx saw the class struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie as the dynamic of modern history. He contended that he had discovered a scientific law which assured that the proletariat would be victorious in this struggle; that it would overthrow the bourgeoisie by a VIOLENT AND BLOODY revolutionary process and establish its hegemony in every country and ultimately over the entire world

    Jew Frederick Engels, the side kick of Mad Marx , was so convinced of the inevitability of this that Engels undertook the study of military science so that he could serve as commander-in-chief of the world proletarian armies. 

    The Communist Manifesto ends with the grim warning: "Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win." (Page 96)

    Marx believed that a scientific program based upon these laws could create a new and superb quality of human nature. This new man would possess such diverse talents that he would be able to perform a vast variety of functions.

    Marx stated: "In communist society, where no one has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticize after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, shepherd, or critic." (Collected Works, Vol. V, page 275)


    Despite his capacity for self-delusion, Karl Marx did not believe that the desired condition known as Communism could emerge suddenly from existing capitalism. 

    As the beautiful butterfly must pass through the stage of the caterpillar before it can fly in all its glory, Communism must pass through the stage of Socialism before the era of abundance and freedom can dawn. 

    Steel can only be created by passing iron and coal through a fiery furnace, and Communism can only be created by passing society through the fires of violent revolution and brute dictatorship.


    Communism is the hypothetical end result which will reward the survivors of the long march that is necessary to move from Capitalism to Communism. 

    Steps on this long march include: 1) Revolution, 2) Dictatorship of the Proletariat, 3) Destruction of the Capitalist State, 4) Liquidation of the Bourgeoisie, 5) Creation of Socialism, 6) Creation of the New Socialist Man, 7) Withering Away of the State, and 8) Emergence of Communism.   CHOO CHWEEET APPAH !


    The purpose of the revolution is to overthrow the existing government and to replace it by the dictatorship of the Proletariat, which is actually the dictatorship of the Communist Party over the proletariat. The Communist Party monopolizes all the levers of power.

    Lenin defined the dictatorship of the proletariat as follows: "The dictatorship of the proletariat is the rule-unrestricted by law and based on force-of the proletariat over the bourgeoisie, a rule enjoying the sympathy and support of the laboring and exploited masses." (The State and the Revolution by Lenin as quoted in Problems of Leninism by J. Stalin, page 49)


    Jew Lenin was as concerned with the maintenance of power as with its seizure.. Above all, the army must be destroyed and replaced by a new army, a "Red Army.", led by Jew Generals

    When the revolution is successful, the majority of the bourgeois class remains. In the words of Karl Marx, they must be "swept out of the way and made impossible." If this is not done, they will form the environment in which a substantial segment of the population is nurtured and will thus destroy the prospect of a perfect society.

    The liquidation of the bourgeoisie by violence is an essential step of the path to Communism. This is why Communism must kill.

    In the Communist Program for human regeneration, killing is as necessary as the fire of the furnace is for the creation of steel

    This program of slaughter is rational if the basic premises of Marxism are accepted. If there is no God who teaches, "Thou shalt not kill," and if people are merely animals, why should they not be treated as animals?  Husbandmen who breed finer animals and destroy the inferior ones in the process are respected and honored throughout the world.  

    The Communists believe that they are the husbandmen who have been selected by history to enact the programs that will result in the creation of perfect human animals. To hesitate to eliminate the diseased would be to betray their glorious mission.


    THE DEPLORABLE CONDUCT OF THE COMMUNISTS IS NOT DUE TO THEIR DEPARTING FROM THE TEACHINGS OF MARX, BUT TO THEIR OBEDIENCE TO THEM. THIS IS WHY THE SHOE OF JEW MARX MUST BE DIPPED IN HIS OWN KOSHER SHIT AND MUST BE APPLIED VIOLENTLY ACROSS HIS FACE

    "The proof of the pudding is in the eating." The ingredients of the communist pudding are lethal. The massive and widespread homicide that characterizes Communist conduct is the fulfillment of Marxism.

    The Marxist doctrines of ATHEISM, MATERIALISM, ECONOMIC DETERMINISM, CLASS, CLASS LIQUIDATION, CLASS DICTATORSHIP and INEVITABLE PROGRESS are false and deadly.

    Marx developed a theory of historical materialism. He describes the mid-19th-century condition in The Communist Manifesto as follows:-- 
    The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society. Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form, was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence for all earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty, and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all which is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real condition of life and his relations with his kind.

    Furthermore, Marx described the process of social progress, which in his opinion is based on the interaction between the productive forces and the relations of production:

    No social order is ever destroyed before all the productive forces for which it is sufficient have been developed, and new superior relations of production never replace older ones before the material conditions for their existence have matured within the framework of the old society.

    Capitalism is thought by Marx as a process of continual change, in which the growth of markets dissolve all fixities in human life, and Marx admits that capitalism is progressive and non-reactionary.

     Marxism further states that capitalism, in its quest for higher profits and new markets, will inevitably sow the seeds of its own destruction. Marxists believe that, in the future, capitalism will be replaced by socialism and eventually communism.

    “The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” spAke Marx.

    “Reason has always existed, but not always in a reasonable form.” ― Karl Marx
    TOBA TOAHBAAAHH

    Instead of Mickey Mouse, commie children  were raised on stories about politically active children—little commie heroes.

    A major role model for Soviet kids was Pavlik Morozov, a martyr of the 1930s. At the tender age of thirteen, he turned his father in to authorities for not sharing Pavlik’s belief in communism and not supporting Joseph Stalin’s strategy of collective farming. 

    Though most likely a product of a propagandist’s imagination, the story goes that Pavlik’s father was sent to a labor camp and later executed, while Pavlik was murdered by his own family.

    As part of school curriculum, Commies discussed the young martyr, praising his bravery and loyalty to communism, absorbing his story through poems and schoolbooks.





    Among colleges and universities, the University of California, Berkeley has — since the 1960s — held the title as the most radically liberal.  Hailed by leftists as “the birthplace of Free Speech,” the university and the town from which it draws its name have long been a seedbed of communist ideology ( sustained by Jewish professors ) . 

    With that communist ideology having now come of age, Berkeley is becoming the deathbed of Free Speech.   

    Berkeley UC has an endowed faculty chair in Israel Studies for Jewish Law and Israel Studies.   JNU Social sciences dept gets its rabid commie ideology from Jewish Commie professors of Berkeley UC ..

    Berkeley UC and Antifa ( Jewish Commie unit ) vehemently support Jewess Greta Thunberg..



    In the current “Free Speech” battle, as in other times and places, the communists say one thing and mean another.   Touting “Free Speech” to get their message heard, they immediately shout “hate speech” and “fascism” to silence their ideological opponents as soon as they have enough influence to do so. When shouting isn’t enough, they use violence or the threat of violence.



    WHITE JEWISH PROFESSORS  WHO TEACH SOCIAL SCIENCES IN COLUMBIA AND BERKELEY UC  ARE RABIDLY ANTI-HINDU AND ANTI-INDIA


    THEIR MAIN AIM IS TO DIVIDE HINDUS AND CREATE CHAOS IN INDIA..

    For a campus that claims to value diversity in thought, the attack on free speech is more than hypocritical; it is telling. One thing that can be said of communists is that they are consistent in their tactics.

    ANY INDIAN STUDENT WHO HAS STUDIED SOCIAL SCIENCES AND JOURLAMISM IN COLUMBIA AND BERKELEY UC MUST BE PROFILED.. EXAMPLE:  BARKHA DUTT STUDIED JOURNALISM IN COLUMBIA ..

    A LOT OF THESE COMMIE STUDENTS ARE CHILDREN OF BABUS WHO HAVE SOLD NATIONs SECRETS TO THE JEWISH DEEP STATE.. 

    TAMIL BRAHMIN RAGHURAM RAJANs FATHER R GOVINDARAJAN ( WORKED FOR RAW ) DAMAGED HIS SONs PROESPECTS IN INDIA.. 
     
    RAJIV GANDHI KICKED RAW AGENT  R GOVINDARAJAN ON HIS TEETH, KAAN PAKADKE NIKAAL DIYA FOR ANTI NATIONAL ACTIVITIES.

     HE WAS SUPERCEEDED AND SIDELINED..   RAGURAN RAJAN WAS MENTORED IN ECONOMICS BY JEW STEWART MYERS


    Subramanian Swamy  on May 12 in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi demanded sacking of RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan.   "The RBI governor is wilfully and deliberately wrecking the Indian economy. He is mentally not fully Indian." “In my opinion, the RBI Governor is not appropriate for the country. I don’t want to speak much about him. He has hiked interest rates in the garb of controlling inflation that has damaged the country. His actions have led to collapse of industry and rise of unemployment in the economy. The sooner he is sent back to Chicago, the better it would be.”

    ROTHSCHILD CONTROLS THE INFLATION RATE ON THIS PLANET.. WE ALL KNOW THE INFLATION RATES OF ZIMBABWE AND VENEZUELA..  IF THE RULER ALLOWS JEWS TO STEAM, THE INFLATION RATE WILL COME DOWN WITHIN AN HOUR. 

    VADAKAYIL SUPPORTS SWAMY..   FOR MANY INDIANS THIS IS ENOUGH..



    GITA GOPINATH HAS BECOME IMF CHIEF NOT BECAUSE OF HER BRILLIANCE, BUT JUST BECAUSE SHE IS THE BLOOD RELATIVE OF ROTHSCHILDs AGENT COMMIE AK GOPALAN



    SHE WILL SELL INDIA FOR  HALF A PIECE OF FOREIGN KOSHER SILVER..
    WE IN INDIA HAVE STOPPED CARING FOR ROTHSCHILDs ECONOMICS..

    GITA BABY HAS BEEN  PERSONALLY HANDPICKED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD, TO SHOWCASE INDIA AS A BEGGAR NATION....

    ALL WAR EXPENSES OF USA ARE ADDING TO ITS GDP.. HURRICANE DAMAGE  INCREASES AMERICAN GDP...  DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER INCASED US GDP.  DRUG ADDICTS AND THEIR REHABILITATION INCREASES  THE GDP OF USA..THE MEXICO WALL COST IS ADDING TO USAs GDP..   GDP DOES NOT FACTOR IN THE 23.3 TRILLION UD DEBT OF USA.  

    WAAH RAAJA WAAH !


    Peaceful societies, like India, characterized by a lower level of crime (and consequently legal activities, prisons, etc.)  are penalized in terms of GDP! ..  The same is true for countries with a healthy way of life!   

    By the way  drugs to cure fast food effects on health and low mobility induced excessive weight of Hilly Billy Yanks and John Bulls are a multi-billion industry...

    Gita Gopinath wants India to project “ REAL GDP” with GDP DEFLATOR.  ..

    The GDP deflator, also called implicit price deflator, is a measure of inflation. ..

    We all know how Jew Rothschild calculates inflation.. which is in reality essentially a hidden tax on the public..


    BEFORE SHE SAT ON THE TOP IMF CHAIR, GITA GOPINATH , WAS ECONOMIC ADVISER TO ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN... 


    German-speaking Jews who arrived in the United States in the mid-19th century spread across the U.S. and tended to be merchants and shopkeepers. Yiddish-speaking Jews from Eastern Europe who arrived in the U.S. beginning in the 1880s settled in the big cities and tended to be workers.

     Their children were entitled to a free public education and once they became citizens, they could vote and participate in the political process.

     It did not take long before they began to see commie trade unions as the path their economic and social progress.

    JEW Samuel Gompers  was a Jewish immigrant labor union leader and a key figure in American labor history.  Gompers founded the American Federation of Labor (AFL), and served as the organization's president from 1886 to 1894, and from 1895 until his death in 1924.

    Samuel baby was a high ranking FREE MASON

    He also encouraged the AFL to take political action to "elect their friends (JEWS) " and "defeat their enemies (CHRISTIANS)"

    By 1888, there was already a Jewish labor organization called the United Hebrew Trades, originally conceived by Russian-speaking Jewish intellectuals and revolutionaries


    JEW Abraham Cahan, later the editor of the Yiddish newspaper, the socialist daily Forvertz, was one of these early revolutionaries and was the first to use Yiddish to reach Jewish workers. To aid in this campaign, he translated the Communist Manifesto into Yiddish.

    Cahan was one of the founders of The Forward “ an American Yiddish publication, and was its editor-in-chief for 43 years.

    JEWS FIRST TOOK OVER THE PORN INDUSTRY AND THEN THEY TOOK OVER HOLLYWOOD

     Jewish labor leader who was also of Sephardic origin – JEW Daniel DeLeon - was the dominant figure in the first major socialist organization in the U.S. - the Socialist Labor Party (SLP). An immigrant from Curacao, a American socialist newspaper editor, politician, Marxist theoretician, and trade union organizer. 

    He is regarded as the forefather of the idea of revolutionary industrial unionism and was the leading figure in the Socialist Labor Party of America from 1890 until the time of his death in 1914

    Caribbean island ruled by the Dutch, he was, for a brief period, a popular figure among East European Jews


    Jew Lenin saying on the fifth anniversary of the revolution, "..What we have done in Russia is accept the De Leon interpretation of Marxism, that is what the Bolsheviki adopted in 1917.

    Jew Morris Winchevsky a prominent Jewish socialist leader in London and the United States in the late 19th century founded what would later become the largest Yiddish-language daily newspaper in the world, The Forward in 1897.   He was subsequently associated with the Communist Party USA and its Yiddish daily Morgen Freiheit.

    Commie Jew Morris Rosenfeld was a Yiddish poet. He was a delegate to the Fourth Zionist Congress at London in 1900, and gave readings at Harvard University in 1898

    He wrote this verse:
    The sweatshop at midday - I will draw you a picture;
    A battlefield bloody; the conflict at rest;
    Around and about me the corpses are lying;
    The blood cries aloud from the earth's gory breast.
    A moment... and hark! The loud signal is sounded,
    And dead rise again and renewed in their fight...
    They struggle, these corpses; for strangers, for strangers!
    They struggle, they fall and they sink into the night.

    Not only were poems like this widely read, they were put to music and sung by Jewish workers.

    During Jewish Holiday of Yom Kippur in 1899,   Commie Jew Benjamin Feigenbaum famously said in alternative event  "If there is a God and if he is Almighty as the clergy claims he is, I give him just two minutes’ time to kill me on the spot, so that he may prove his existence!"  after two minutes he declared "See! There is no God!".


    JEWESS Clara Lemlich was  the founding member of the Communist Party in 1919. As a housewife during the US Depression, she organized rent strikes and boycotts over high meat prices. She also participated in the Emma Lazarus Clubs, founded by Jewish commie women to fight for social justice and support left-wing Yiddish institutions.

    The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), members of which are commonly termed "Wobblies", is an international commie labor union that was founded in 1905 in Chicago, Illinois, in the United States.   The union combines general unionism with industrial unionism, as it is a general union, subdivided between the various industries which employ its members. The philosophy and tactics of the IWW are described as "revolutionary industrial unionism", with ties to both socialist and anarchist labor movements.

    Fellowship archives state that crypto Jew Abraham Vereide wanted his movement to “carry out its objective through personal, trusting, informal, unpublicized contact between people.”

    Vereide’s establishment of his Prayer Breakfast Movement for anti-Socialist and anti-International Workers of the World (IWW or “Wobblies”)  Jewish Seattle businessmen in 1935 coincided with the establishment of another pro-Nazi Jewish German organization in the United States, the German-American Bund.

    Amerikadeutscher Bund; Amerikadeutscher Volksbund, AV was created by Jew Hitler..using Jew Heinz Spanknöbel..

    German Jew Rothschild sent Jew Heinz Spanknöbel to USA as a christian minister in 1929 (  crypto Jew  Seventh Day Adventist Church in Wurtzenburg, Germany )

    Vereide saw his prayer movement replacing labor unions.

    Jew Heinz Spanknöbel infiltrated the  Ford Motor Company.


    The Bund sponsored by Abraham Veredie was to consist only of American citizens of German Jew descent

    With Rothschild’s help   Jew Heinz Spanknöbel  formed the Friends of New Germany, which was a mouthpiece for Jew Hitler in USA.




    Communism was based on Mad Darwin’s  “finch science”  lies.  Communism unequivocally failed wherever it was attempted.  Men crave power. And once obtained, it is virtually impossible to relinquish, for what powerful men want, is often more power.

    Marx cannot impress Indians with Calculus as we invented Calculus


    It is a kosher lie that Marx, a lawyer knew Math.. His whole book Das Kapital abounds with “lawyer chicanery”..

    Read the link below.. What the fuck is all this ? If this is not abuse of Math to baffle the common man , what is it ?


    https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Mathematical_Manuscripts_1881.pdf

    Like I said before Rothschild arranged for a mathematician Jewess Sofya Aleksandrovna Yanovskaya  to insert Math in Marx’s Das Kapital to make this stupid book look respectable..

    Note:  The types of math used in economics are primarily algebra, calculus and statistics. Algebra is used to make computations such as total cost and total revenue. Calculus is used to find the derivatives of utility curves, profit maximization curves and growth models.



    MATH IS OBJECTIVE.. IT PROVIDES TUNNEL VISION..  

    ECONOMICS  MUST HAVE CONDOR VISION AND SUBJECTIVE MUST HOLD VETO POWER.

    IMAGINE MAD CUNTS ARE USING MATH TO DO RISK ANALYSIS AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS.


    .
    TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE FURTHER READ THE POST BELOW..



    The practice of how mainstream economics uses mathematics is abusive and is an attempt by Jew Rothschild to fool the masses regarding the "science" economists practice.

    The ubiquity of mathematical theory in economics also has serious downsides: it creates a high barrier to entry for those who want to participate in the professional dialogue, and makes checking someone’s work excessively laborious. Worst of all, it imbues economic theory with unearned empirical authority.

    Calculus, was originally called infinitesimal calculus or "the calculus of infinitesimals", is the mathematical study of continuous change, in the same way that geometry is the study of shape and algebra is the study of generalizations of arithmetic operations.

    It has two major branches, differential calculus and integral calculus; the former concerns instantaneous rates of change, and the slopes of curves, while integral calculus concerns accumulation of quantities, and areas under or between curves.

    Calculus helps us understand changes between values that are related by a function. ... 

    All these formulas are functions of time, and so that is one way to think of calculus — studying functions of time.

    Differential calculus is applied to original supply and demand models to determine how different factors will shift the lines representing supply or demand in the economic market. 

    Common mathematical techniques in microeconomics courses include geometry, order of operations, balancing equations and using derivatives for comparative statistics.

    Mathematical economics is the application of mathematical methods to represent theories and analyze problems in economics. 

    By convention, these applied methods are beyond simple geometry, such as differential and integral calculus, difference and differential equations, matrix algebra, mathematical programming, and other computational methods. 

    Proponents of this approach claim that it allows the formulation of theoretical relationships with rigor, generality, and simplicity  MY LEFT BALL !

    The language of mathematics allows economists to make specific, positive claims about controversial or contentious subjects that would be impossible without mathematics.  

    Much of economic theory is currently presented in terms of mathematical economic models, a set of stylized and simplified mathematical relationships asserted to clarify assumptions and implications.

    Broad applications include:--

    optimization problems as to goal equilibrium, whether of a household, business firm, or policy maker
    static (or equilibrium) analysis in which the economic unit (such as a household) or economic system (such as a market or the economy) is modeled as not changing
    comparative statics as to a change from one equilibrium to another induced by a change in one or more factors
    dynamic analysis, tracing changes in an economic system over time, for example from economic growth.

    Mathematical optimization (alternatively spelled optimisation) or mathematical programming is the selection of a best element (with regard to some criterion) from some set of available alternatives


    CUNT AMARTYA SEN EVEN USED  MATH TO EXPLAIN FAMINE MODELS .

    Adam Smith had published his Wealth of Nations in 1776. The earliest economists were philosophers who used deduction and logic to explain the market. 

    Smith deployed numerical analysis only as a means of qualitatively assessing government policies such as legislated grain prices and their impact. No graphs or equations were used.

    Jew Rothschild used Das capital to convince the masses that  economics is a science—like physics or chemistry.

    The "abuse of mathematics" certainly happens: producers and consumers of economic theory tend to not question/worry/have nightmares about "the premises", to the extent that they should.    

    But once we leave the premises unchallenged, the conclusions become "undeniable truth", since they have been derived in the rigorous mathematical way.  This is like “how can there be shit on Oxford street”..

    A major issue in macroeconomics is that every policy decision must be self-referential. It's very easy to accidentally assume that some small actor won't change their decision making slightly in an unexpected way that makes the whole thing fall apart. It's also very easy to make the mathematics look airtight.

    In more microeconomic situations, you have assumptions about how the world will function. This is most easily seen by developing an AI which can make a killing when fed historical data, but which fails utterly in the real market.

    The problem with math as used in modern economics is that the math is often used to describe models of human behavior.   Modeling human behavior, whether with math or otherwise, is IMPOSSIBLE over long time scales, if our goal is to make the model match reality . 

    Mathematical models of human behavior are by their very nature bound to fail in multitudinous ways, so that the detailed economic models built by economists do not match reality and don't have clear practical utility. 

    Economics must move away from modeling human behavior and move towards modeling institutions, governments, companies, etc. and the dynamics involving these agents.

    Economics is a social science, not an empirical or laboratory one. It is the study of human behavior in response to competing demands in an environment of scarcity. 

    Human behavior cannot be predicted with mathematical precision — the only way to do it is to make large numbers of gratuitous and unsupportable assumptions about what people will do under a given set of circumstances.

    It is impossible to quantify human action. Although equations, such as utility measures, do exist to quantify human behavior, they are faulty when examined. How can an equation tell me when I am no longer satisfied with a certain good? There cannot be “catch-all” formulas due to the complexity of economic phenomena. 

    Measuring the elasticity of demand for a certain good is at best a contribution to economic history. Elasticity will hardly be constant in the same country throughout time, let alone in other countries.

    Economics, among other things, is the study of the allocation of scarce resources. Economics is more related to jurisprudence than math. Mathematics has a place at best for budgets and debt servicing—but it should be recognized that mathematically-driven economics is a divergence from the foundation of traditional economics.

    I WONDER WHAT MATH SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY ( WHO WORE A MOSSAD SPONSORED SIKH TURBAN IN 1976 ) DID TO CONVINCE PM CHANDRASHEKHAR TO SELL 47 TONNES OF OUR PRISTINE GOLD TO ROTHSCHILD IN 1977.

    Marx used irony and the idea of inner contractions as a logical method of interpreting economic history. This was not a method that could well be expressed mathematically. 

    Although Marx used arithmetic examples to illustrate the rates of profit and surplus value for enterprises employing differing proportions of labor and capital, this was not a mathematical model of the economy. 

    The Communist Manifesto hardly could be expressed in mathematical formulae, and no Marxist tried to express dialectical materialism mathematically.


    Many economists are trained in calculus and higher mathematics without feeling much need to test their theories quantitatively. They tend to use mathematics less as an empirical measuring tool than as an expository language, or simply as a decoration to give a seemingly scientific veneer to their policy prescriptions























    1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED..

      CAPTAIN..

      YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS PLANET WHO CAN EXHUME TRUTHS. AND YOU HAVE SAID BEFORE “THE REAL REVELATIONS WITH COME WHEN YOU REACH THE 98% SEGMENT”.. AND YOU ARE NOW AT 60%..

      CAPTAIN, PLEASE TELL WHY YOU SAY “TAJ MAHAL IS A HINDU MONUMENT”.

      WELL,

      EVER SINCE I EXPLAINED “QUTAB MINAR IS A HINDU MONUMENT”, MUSLIMS HAVE QUIETLY ACCEPTED IT ..

      BECAUSE I EXPLAINED THE TOWER HAS TO BEEN SEEN FROM A HOVERING HELICOPTER FROM TOP, TO REALIZE WHAT IT MEANS . AND IT IS “NO CONTEST” AFTER THIS REVELATION..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/09/qutab-minar-was-dhruv-stambh-vishnu.html

      IN THE POST ABOVE I HAVE GIVEN SOME PICTURES OF THE INNARDS OF TAJ MAHAL.

      I HAVE POSTED PHOTOS OF THE TAJ MAHAL SPIRE, AND THE HUGE MOSAIC ON THE FLOOR OF THE TAJ MAHAL SHOWING THE SPIRE IN 2D..

      IT IS CLEARLY A KALASHA KUMBHAM… THE MOST POTENT SYMBOL OF SANATANA DHARMA..

      IN 1975 I HAVE SEEN THE SAME KALASHA KUMBHAM AT ISTANBUL, ON THE FLOOR OF THE SOPHIA HAGIA MOSQUE. EXACTLY LIKE IN TAJ MAHAL.

      I SAW TRIDENT ( TRISHUL ) MOTIFS ON THE INNER DOME OF SOPHIA HAGUE DOME AND IT IS STILL THERE..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-roman-pantheon-inaugurated.html

      NOW –

      TIME TO THINK CLEARLY.

      TAJ MAHAL HAS FOUR MINARETS.. THIS IS NOT A ISLAM THINGY THOUGH MUSLIMS MAY CLAIM SO..

      IN ISLAM MOSQUES JUST HAVE ONE MINARET FOR THE AZAN CALL.

      THE SOPHIA HAGIA CHURCH IN ISTANBUL ALSO HAS FOUR MINARETS. WHY SHOULD A CHURCH HAVE FOUR MINARETS ?

      SOPHIA HAGIA MONUMENT WAS FIRST A HINDU TEMPLE THEN A CHURCH , THEN A MOSQUE AND TODAY IT IS A MUSEUM.

      THE SOPHIA HAGIA TEMPLE WAS BUILT BY ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT ..

      JEWESS HELENA THE MOTHER OF HINDU EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT CAUSED THE ROMAN EMPIRE CAPITAL TO BE SHIFTED FROM ROME TO ISTANBUL ( CONSTANTINOPLE ) IN 330 AD..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/istanbul-deep-seat-of-jewish-deep-state.html

      THE REASON WAS ROME DID NOT GENERATE MONEY. WHILE CONSTANTINOPLE WAS THE HUB OF SPICES EXPORTED BY CALICUT KING ( MY HOMETOWN ).

      SPICE WENT BY SHIP TO GWADAR PORT , THEN BY OVERLAND ROUTE BY CARAVAN TILL GEORGIA BATUMI AND FROM THERE BY SHIP TO CONSTANTINOPE ( ISTANBUL ).. FROM THERE THE WHITE JEWS TOOK OVER AS MIDDLEMEN.

      THIS IS WHY THE CURRENT WHITE JEWS IN ISRAEL ARE KHAZARS FROM GEORGIA.

      CONSTANTINE THE GREAT WAS POISONED BY HIS SON AND THEN BAPTIZED WITHIN A HOUR OF HIS DEATH FROM HINDUISM TO CHRISTIANITY ON 22ND MAY 337 AD...

      CONSTANTINE THE GREAT TOOK LESS THAN 5 YEARS TO BUILD SOPHIA HAGIA CHURCH.. WELL, HE WAS A HINDU, WHY SHOULD HE BUILD A CHURCH ?? .

      AND IT TOOK JUST 5 YEARS TO BUILD SUCH A HUGE STRUCTURE?? ,OH YEAH ?  IT IS IMPOSSIBLE..


      THE MARBLE STATUE OF CONSTANTINE THE GREAT EXISTED INSIDE THE SOPHIA HAGIA AND IT WAS REMOVED BY SULTAN MEHMED II ON 29TH MAY 1453...

      AFTER CONSTANTINE THE GREAT WAS MURDERED BY HIS SON, THE HINDU ( PAGAN ) MOTIFS WERE CHISELED/ GROUND OFF AND HINDU GOD IDOLS SMASHED. ..

      BUT THE CHRISTIAN SON WHO CONVERTED THE HINDU SHIVA TEMPLE INTO A SOPHIA HAGIA CHURCH NEGLECTED TO REMOVE THE HUGE TOP KALASHA KUMBHAM SPIRE .. WHICH WAS MADE OF GOLD INFUSED WITH IRRIDIUM EXACTLY LIKE IN TAJ MAHAL.
      IN 1857 ROTHSCHILD REMOVED THE TAJ MAHAL SPIRE AND MELTED IT AND CARTED IT AWAY TO GERMANY AND INSTALLED A DUPLICATE IN PLACE , WHICH IS WHAT YOU SEE TODAY..

      ON MAY 29TH 1453, TURK SULTAN MEHMED II CONQUERED CONSTANTINOPLE.. EMPEROR CONSTANINE XI WAS KILLED IN BATTLE..

      THE FIRST THING KING MEHMED II DID WAS TO REMOVE ALL CHRISTIAN ARTIFACTS AND INSTALL ISLAMIC ONES.

      MEHMED II CONSTRICTED A WOODEN MINARAT FOR THE AZAN CALL. NOW SOPHIA HAGIA WAS A CONVERSION FROM HINDU TEMPLE TO CHURCH TO MOSQUE

      MEHMED IIs BLOOD MOTHER WAS A JEWESS NAMED HUMA HATUN. BUT AT A YOUNG AGE HIS FATHER MURAD II MADE HIS SERBIAN STEPMOTHER TAKE CARE OF HIM FAR AWAY FOR SAFETY .. REASON--MEHMED IIs ELDER CROWN PRINCE BROTHER WAS STRANGULATED TO DEATH ..

      CONTINUED TO 2-
      1. CONTINUED FROM 1--

        MEHMED IIs SERBIAN STEP MOTHER WAS A HINDU (PAGAN )..

        SHE CONSULTED A HINDU ASTROLOGER WHO MADE AN ASTRONOMICAL CHART INDICATING THAT ON 28TH MAY 1453 21 YEAR OLD MEHMED II SHOULD ATTACK CONSTANTINOPLE , AS SOME PLANETS ALIGNED IN A RARE BUT POWERFUL MANNER ..

        ON THIS DAY THERE WOULD BE A BLOOD ( RED ) MOON AND THE IRIDIUM SPIRE ON SOPHIA HAGIA DOME WOULD EMIT FIRE-- WHICH IS CALLED ST ELMOs FIRE BY SEAMEN –

        ( IT HAPPENED IN MOBY DICK NOVEL AND CAPTAIN AHAB USED THIS TO BRAINWASH HIS FRIGHTENED SAILORS THAT HE IS EMPOWERED BY GOD )..

        THE EVENT WAS USED AS A GREAT PROPAGANDA VALUE AT CONSTANTINOPLE .. THE MUSLIM ARMY OF MEHMED II SAW THE RED MOON AND THEY GOT CHARGED UP.

        ON THE OTHER HAND, THE CHRISTIAN ARMY OF THE KING CONSTANTINE XI SAW THE ST ELMO FIRE CRACKING WITH GREAT SOUND AND LIGHT ( LIKE LIGHTNING AND THUNDER ) AND THEIR MORALE CRASHED..

        THEY THOUGHT THEIR GOD JESUS / MARY IS DESERTING THEM.

        THE BASTARD JEW POPE INNOCENT III IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE END OF THE ENORMOUS POWER OF CHRISTIAN ROMAN EMPIRE AT CONSTANTINOPLE BY SECRETLY ASKING THE CATHOLIC CRUSADERS TO LOOT THE WEALTH OF CONSTANTINOPLE ( FOURTH CRUSADE APRIL 1204 AD )....

        AFTER THE CITY'S SACKING, MOST OF THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE'S TERRITORIES WERE DIVIDED UP AMONG THE CATHOLIC CRUSADERS. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DON’T KISS THE HAND OF THE POPE..

        RELATIONS BETWEEN THE CATHOLIC AND ORTHODOX CHURCHES WERE CATASTROPHICALLY WOUNDED FOR MANY CENTURIES AFTERWARDS, AND WOULD NOT BE SUBSTANTIALLY REPAIRED UNTIL MODERN TIMES.

        TO FULLY UNDERSTAND WHY THE SACK OF CONSTANTINOPLE HAPPENED, IT’S IMPORTANT TO KNOW ABOUT WHAT OCCURRED 33 YEARS BEFORE THE FOURTH CRUSADE BEGAN.

        IN THE 12TH CENTURY, CONSTANTINOPLE HAD THREE QUARTERS, WHICH WERE INHABITED BY MERCHANTS OF VENICE, PISA, AND GENOA.

        AS TIME PASSED, TENSION BEGAN TO GROW, BECAUSE THE JEWISH VENETIANS DIDN’T TOLERATE THAT THEY HAD SPICE TRADE COMPETITORS ( SPICES SHIPPED FROM CALICUT ) WHO COULD POSSIBLY OUTMATCH THEM.

        SUBSEQUENTLY, IN 1171, THE JEWISH VENETIANS RANSACKED THE GENOESE QUARTER, WHEREBY THE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN GENOESE WERE KILLED AND THEIR PROPERTY WAS LOOTED.

        EMPEROR MANUEL I KOMNENOS IMPRISONED ALL THE VENETIANS THAT WERE LIVING IN THE JEWISH VENETIAN QUARTER, AND THEIR PROPERTY WAS CONFISCATED.

        IN 1182, THE BYZANTINES MASSACRED ABOUT 61,000 ROMAN CATHOLICS THAT INHABITED THE LATIN QUARTER IN CONSTANTINOPLE. ONLY 4.300 MANAGED TO SURVIVE.

        THESE 4.300 CATHOLICS WERE SOLD AS SLAVES TO THE TURKS IN ANATOLIA.

        THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WESTERN AND EASTERN CHURCHES ONLY WORSENED AFTER THIS MASSACRE.

        22 YEARS LATER, THE INEVITABLE OCCURRED; THE FOURTH CRUSADE.

        THE REASON WHY THE CATHOLIC CRUSADERS WERE ABLE TO SACK CONSTANTINOPLE IS DUE TO THE SUPPORT OF THE JEW VENETIANS. THE PARTICIPATION OF THE VENETIANS IN THE FOURTH CRUSADE HAD A LOT TO DO WITH MONEY AND REVENGE.

        SPICE MERCHANT JEW ENRICO DANDOLO IS KNOWN FOR HIS ROLE IN THE FOURTH CRUSADE AND THE SACK OF CONSTANTINOPLE. THIS JEWISH BASTARD IS THE REAL SHYLOCK.

        BY THE TIME OTTOMAN TURK SULTAN MEHMED II TOOK OVER CONSTANTINOPLE, ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE XI WAS MORE OF A MAYOR OF AN IMPOVERISHED CITY.. HE WAS NO MIGHTY AUGUSTUS OR JULIUS CAESAR..

        MEHMED II COULD HAVE BEEN DEFEATED IF THE BASTARD JEW POPE NICHOAS V HAD SENT A NAVAL FLEET TO SAVE CONSTANTINOPLE .. THE JEW POPE KEPT SAYING HE WILL SEND ARMS, SOLDIERS AND FOOD, BUT HE NEVER DID.

        THE MIGHTY POPE WAS ASKED ON 2ND APRIL FOR HELP AND IT DID NOT ARRIVE TILL 29TH MAY 1453 WHEN THE EMPEROR CONSTANTINE XI WAS KILLED..

        IT IS THE FIRST TIME THE ROLE OF THESE JEW POPES IN EXTERMINATING THE CHRISTIAN ROMAN EMPIRE IS BEING TOLD.. ONLY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL CAN DO THIS..

        POOR WHITE CHRISTIANS – ALWAYS RAPED BY JEWS ..

        THE LAST 70% OF OTTOMAN SULTANS WERE JEWS..

        ALL MUGHAL EMPEROR AFTER HUMAYUN WERE JEWS..

        IF I HAD NOT REVEALED THIS NOBODY COULD—TILL THE SUN GOES SUPERNOVA. MY REVELATIONS NOW JUMP TO 60.24 %..

        Capt ajit vadakayil
        ..
    BELOW: IRIDIUM INFUSED TOP SPIRE ON MAIN DOME INTERACTS WITH IRIDIUM TIPPED MINARETS TO CREATE ST ELMOs FIRE

    THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THE SCALAR FIELD OF BRAHMAN 


    IN THE LINK BELOW--  CAPTAIN AHAB BLOWS OUT THE FIRE FROM THE TIP OF HIS HARPOON

    https://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/42/moby-dick/800/chapter-119-the-candles/



    THE TIP OF THE EGYPTIAN PYRAMID AT GIZA WOULD GLOW BLUE ORGONE PLASMA AT WILL, AND COULD BE SEEN THOUSANDS OF KMS AWAY

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/10/eight-sided-pyramid-of-giza-egypt.html


    WHILE DEFENDER OF CONSTANTINOPLE  CAPTAIN GIOVANNI GIUSTINIANI ( A BRAVE AND RESOURCEFUL SEA PIRATE  TURNED MERCENARY ) STOOD TRANSFIXED BY THE FLAME, HE WAS TAKEN OUT BY AN SNIPER ARROW.. 

    THE SIEGE WAS OVER AT THAT VERY MOMENT.

    MEHMED II HAD A WHITE FLAG MEETING WITH  CHRISTIAN CAPTAIN GIOVANNI GIUSTINIANI  HIM..  OFFERED HIM THREE TIME MORE PRIZE MONEY AND ALSO PROMISED TO MAKE HIM KING OF THE AEGEAN ISLANDS..  BEING A MAN OF HONOR , HE REFUSED.. 



    ONLY FIVE YEARS TO CONSTRUCT ?   

    OH YEAH ?

    IT WILL TAKE MORE THAN 15 YEARS TO  EVEN BUILD THE FOUNDATION OF SOPHIA HAGUE AS THERE IS A MASSIVE WATER TUNNEL SYSTEM UNDERNEATH.



    JEWS / CHRISTIANS/ MUSLIMS /ATHEISTS DO NOT WANT THESE 12,000 YEAR OLD TUNNELS TO BE SCIENTIFICALLY DATED AND HENCE ( LIKE TAJ MAHAL ) IS BRICKED UP



    THERE ARE HINDU ( PAGAN ) MOTIFS ON THE PILLARS OF THE UNDERGROUND TUNNELS 


    PAGAN MOTIFS HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO CHRISTIAN LORE.. THIS IS NO BULLSHIT MEDUSA..  EVEN IF IT IS MEDUSA , IT IS FAR FAR OLDER THAN CHRISTIANITY.


    GIANT AQUEDUCTS FAR OLDER THAN SOPHIA HAGUE BRING WATER TO THE UNDERGROUND TUNNELS OF SOPHIA HAGUE

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-roman-pantheon-inaugurated.html


    BRICKED UP 12,000 YEAR OLD KERALA DANAVA CIVILIZATION HISTORY OF THE SOPHIA HAGIA HINDU TEMPLE..

    AFTER ALL , AS PER THE BIBLE ( COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA IN 325 AD ) , THE BIG BANG HAPPENED ON 23RD OCT , 9 AM IN 4004 BC

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-12000-year-old-baalbek.html







    FALSIFICATION OF ANCIENT HINDU SPIRITUAL HISTORY WAS THE NO 1 AGENDA OF JEW KARL MARX AND HIS BOSS JEW ROTHSCHILD .. 

    THERE COULD BE NO WORLD HISTORY OLDER THAN 6000 YEARS ..


    FREEMASON NEHRU PLAYED BALL IN HIS “GLIMPSES OF WORLD HISTORY BOOK




    1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gegVPC_bRCs
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLLS73hw8XE

      THIS HINDU MONASTRY IS 30 CENTURIES OLDER THAN CHRISTIANITY

      PROPHET ELIJAH WAS COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA

      CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE SAYS THAT ELIJAH APPEARED WITH MOSES DURING THE TRANSFIGURATION OF JESUS.

      MOSES NEVER EXISTED—HE WAS COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA.

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/12/helena-mother-of-roman-emperor.html
      IN ISLAM, ELIJAH APPEARS IN THE QURAN AS A PROPHET AND MESSENGER OF GOD, WHERE HIS BIBLICAL NARRATIVE OF PREACHING AGAINST THE WORSHIPERS OF BAAL IS RECOUNTED IN A CONCISE FORM

      DURING JESUS' CRUCIFIXION, SOME OF THE ONLOOKERS WONDER IF ELIJAH WILL COME TO RESCUE HIM, AS BY THE TIME OF JESUS, ELIJAH HAD ENTERED FOLKLORE AS A RESCUER OF JEWS IN DISTRESS.

      JESUS NEVER EXISTED.. HE WAS COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA IN 325 AD

      A MAP OF MOUNTAIN-CULTS OF ZEUS SHOWS THAT MOST OF THESE SITES ARE NOW DEDICATED TO ELIAS, INCLUDING MOUNT OLYMPUS, MOUNT LYKAION, MOUNT ARACHNAION, AND MOUNT TALETON ON THE MAINLAND, AND MOUNT KENAION, MOUNT OCHE, AND MOUNT KYNADOS IN THE ISLANDS.

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/05/thor-zeus-marduk-brihaspati-and-jupiter.html

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
    BELOW:   WE WERE CADETS TOGETHER IN 1973.. 

    LEFT TO RIGHT-- SRINIVASAN, VADAKAYIL, MASCERENHAS , PANDE ..

    PLAYING BACK THE OLD NOSTALGIA LADEN  SONG OF "REMEMBER WHEN "..








    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..


    Viewing all 852 articles
    Browse latest View live


    <script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>